TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

izmesoundz Archive

View 0 posts and 152 comments by izmesoundz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You don’t get to spout on about stats regarding single mother households and the outcomes and simultaneously argue for dead beat parents.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 01:42 PM
-1

And yet, this community is obsessed with “paper abortions” and force women to be single moms on their own
/r/MensRights19/04/26 06:32 AM
-2

I’m sure you have a source on that and not something you totally heard from anonymous sources online
/r/MensRights19/04/26 06:31 AM
0

Reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit is it? Also do you have a source on the doctors case? A legitimate source? From quick searching I’m not seeing anything that is close to being verified.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 06:29 AM
-1

You said I made posts about the shooter. I did no such thing. Try to stay on point. The discussion isn’t about medieval times, but IS about the shooting OP wrote about
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:15 PM
0

What have I misrepresented? You said it wouldn’t surprise you if the teachers left the boys behind. There’s no evidence they did, so you pivot to “this is something that happens all the time in modern days” without providing any evidence. Instead you talk about the fucking titanic
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:14 PM
1

How so? Has it been reported teachers left students behind?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:05 PM
0

1) that because you don’t. Did this happen in this situation? You don’t know? Then it’s irrelevant 2) you are literally the one who brought up the titanic example. If you have examples of this happening more recently than a century ago, why not present those?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:05 PM
0

Meanwhile, has it been reported that the teachers left before the boys in the classroom as you seem to believe happened. Or at bare minimum, you have doubts about?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:30 PM
0

What situation have I made up to be mad about? What straw man argument have I made. Please point it out.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:28 PM
0

So your best example is 114 years old? And that doesn’t stop the fact that in regards to this specific situation, you made up a situation to be mad about. My god, it’s gone from the boys let the girls go first to, now in your situation, the teachers left before the boys.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:21 PM
0

No he wasn’t. He admits he doesn’t know if it’s true or not which means he isn’t “spitting facts” it’s straight up rage baiting because he’s a dumbass
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:19 PM
-4

Way to make this entirely fictional situation up in your head
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:11 PM
0

Why? If everyone is consenting and an adult, what’s the problem?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:09 PM
1

“Even if that’s true” OP says it in his fucking post. He says “I think the report is fake”. It’s a fact that he said it. To constantly phrase everything as men vs women is a juvenile mindset and if an adult has that mindset, they need to grow the fuck up. Tone be damned.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:25 PM
1

What in OPs original post is about men’s rights? The story he doesn’t even believe happened?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 05:24 PM
-2

Because as a whole it is a joke. It always just devolves into incel bullshit and blaming women for their every woes
/r/MensRights18/04/26 05:00 PM
-1

Well for starters, you haven’t seemed to even spared a though for the victims, instead you got outraged about a story you yourself admit is probably not true
/r/MensRights18/04/26 04:56 PM
-1

What is the genuine criticism? OP admits the story probably didn’t happen and is outraged about it anyways
/r/MensRights18/04/26 04:53 PM
1

Your sarcasm doesn’t even make sense.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 04:52 PM
-2

I didn’t say anything about the shooter.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 04:06 PM
-12

Not come on here and post about about something you don’t even think happened in order to stir people up
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:11 AM
-6

Because no one is ever going to take any of you seriously when you act like this. There are men’s rights issues I think should be talked about, but posts like this make the wider world see how delusional the majority here are.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:10 AM
-16

Sure seems like it to me. Kids in a middle school get shot, and he comes here immediately to bitch about culture war bullshit
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:08 AM
-7

No I didn’t. Yes he’s complaining about how men let women go first and are seen as cannon fodder.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:08 AM
-34

Ok then don’t. But it’s exactly responses like this why the whole MRM movement is a joke. Most of what I’ve seen is just brain dead asinine takes, and then you have your response here. Instead of taking a second and just acknowledging how horrific what happened is, you immediately turn it into something culture war bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:07 AM
-57

A school shooting happens and your first response is to come here and cry about the supposed gender wars? Jesus Christ grow up
/r/MensRights18/04/26 08:00 AM
-2

Also this entire post reeks of being chronically online and not interacting with actual people
/r/MensRights15/04/26 10:43 AM
-1

What the fuck is a “normie”
/r/MensRights15/04/26 10:32 AM
1

You made the claim not me
/r/MensRights14/04/26 06:36 PM
1

You say there’s no evidence like photos or videos. But in the case of Eric swalwell, there allegedly is.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 05:04 PM
-2

What? Do you have stats to back that up? Cause that sounds like you pulled it out of your ass
/r/MensRights14/04/26 04:58 PM
-36

The thing that was never a law? That thing?
/r/MensRights09/04/26 03:38 PM
-12

Wow. That’s some of the worst math I’ve ever seen. Your entire backing on this is not scientific and extremely bias, not to mention doesn’t give the whole story around sexual assaults
/r/MensRights07/04/26 01:52 PM
1

Ok. What does that have to do with anything OP is talking about or what I said?
/r/MensRights05/04/26 01:39 AM
1

Yeah cause that seems like a reliable source
/r/MensRights04/04/26 03:56 PM
-3

When you search that material out, the algorithm pushes it to you. I’ve never seen a video of anyone saying to kill all men or that all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 05:08 PM
1

Also,you asked me for an example and I provided exactly that. So way to move the fucking goal posts there Also the line “Lord have mercy on my soul” is a bit negated by the line “At least I know, she’s lyin still”
/r/MensRights01/04/26 12:32 AM
3

Also read the fucking question I’m answering. Jesus
/r/MensRights31/03/26 10:38 PM
3

I have provided a counter example in several comments, but since you can’t be bothered allow me. The one that most immediately comes to mind is a song Chris Stapleton sang while he was lead for the Steeldrivers. It’s call “If it hadn’t been for love” where the a man goes hitchhiking just to kill a woman he’s in love with
/r/MensRights31/03/26 09:36 PM
0

Off the top of my head If it hadn’t been for love by the Steeldrivers, the band that Chris Stapleton used to sing for. I don’t see anyone condemning him for singing about murdering the woman he was in love with
/r/MensRights31/03/26 09:33 PM
5

See my other comments below. I care as much as I do for this song. It’s a fucking song
/r/MensRights31/03/26 08:41 PM
5

Couldn’t care less. It’s a song. Some a really good, some suck. I really enjoy the song No body, No crime as well as If it hadn’t been for love.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 08:36 PM
4

They have. Like a lot of them
/r/MensRights31/03/26 08:32 PM
2

What double standard? You are writing about a song. I can find countless songs about men murdering women also. Why is the outrage only one way? If you’re going to be offended by this why are you not offended by the?
/r/MensRights31/03/26 08:26 PM
2

OP posts a thesis on why he’s offended by a fucking song. It’s simple don’t listen to it. I can easily find plenty of songs about men committing violence against women and vice versa. It’s fucking song Jesus Christ. Bunch of snowflakes around here I swear
/r/MensRights31/03/26 08:25 PM
7

So we’re just going to be offended by everything now?
/r/MensRights31/03/26 07:25 PM
1

Ok, do you care to elaborate on any of this?
/r/MensRights28/03/26 07:57 PM
-17

Anyone can cherry pick cases to prove their point. I could just as easily pull up a bunch of sexual abuse cases committed by men. As well as cover ups also done by men. Also, you can say the word rape. It’s not illegal and this whole self censoring shit is weird
/r/MensRights28/03/26 07:56 PM
0

Feel free to read my reply to them. It’s really not that complicated.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 01:25 AM
0

Yes. When you trivialize rape, you are generally a bad fucking person. You can have a discussion about divorce courts and laws surrounding alimony and all that without calling it rape. Because it’s not rape, and if you knew any rape victims and listened to them, you wouldn’t apply it to this situation
/r/MensRights10/03/26 01:25 AM
-1

That is not misogynistic, but being an advocate or using that term is pretty indicative of being an awful person
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:07 AM
-17

Well all you have to do is look around this subreddit. The term is widely used. As is “paper abortion” which is just simply wanting the ability to abandon your child and be a dead beat dad. The entire movement is rife with misogyny that they then claim doesn’t exist for some reason
/r/MensRights07/03/26 08:06 PM
-20

Using terms like divorce rape. Making false equivalency.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 07:59 PM
-31

This is why no one will ever take the MRM seriously
/r/MensRights07/03/26 06:35 PM
1

Then feel free to fucking do that and show your spouse how little you actually care about them or your child No one is forcing the guy to go
/r/MensRights07/03/26 01:16 PM
-1

Oh my god get over your persecution complex. Jesus Christ. People go to an OGBYN for more than just pregnancies. Likewise, how is the doctor supposed to know the person with them is actually the father? This isn’t some imaginary thing where all men are assumed to be predators and more looking out for their patients. My wife has bad anxiety related to anything medical and as a result we always schedule back to back meetings with our PCP. They ask both of us by ourselves if we’re ok with it. For f…
/r/MensRights07/03/26 12:15 AM
3

Exactly. At the end of the day, the guys are not the ones with the appointments, is not seeing their doctor. The woman is. The doctor should be praised that’s she’s looking out for her patients the way they are
/r/MensRights06/03/26 09:45 PM
-9

It’s not discrimination. It’s not YOUR doctor. It’s the wife’s. You are not obligated to go to the back because YOU are not the one having an appointment. Your wife/fiance/girlfriend has the appointment As to your point about only being asked the first time, situations change. A lot of women go to the OGBYN once a year. A lot can change in a year. Instead of feeling angry about it, we should celebrate that the doctor is caring enough of her patients that they do ask these questions
/r/MensRights06/03/26 09:44 PM
-11

I mean, this makes complete sense. There are plenty of times women who are trafficked or abused at home are only able to get help in instances such as going to a doctor specific for women. It’s not that you’re being discriminated against, it’s just that they are genuinely looking out for their patients
/r/MensRights06/03/26 08:35 PM
1

The establishment dems suck ass yes. But the GOP is literally going to bat for the person who is being the aggressor in the conflict…and who also raped children. And raped multiple women. And stole charity money from children with cancer. And discriminated against black people in regards to housing. Raped his former wife. Managed to bankrupt a fucking casino. Has declared bankruptcy god only knows how many times.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 04:57 AM
-2

Blame whoever you want. The reality is is that the only reason this is happening is because people voted for a mentally unstable child rapist.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 11:11 PM
-7

The United States is not Ukraine. Correct the Vietnam war wasn’t a century ago. But there is no reason to believe anyone is getting drafted anytime soon. Even at the peak early 2000s when we were fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan on two wildly different fronts, there was no draft. Sure it’s a possibility, but it’s not happening anytime soon, and if it does, thank the dumb fucks who voted for trump who’s the one dragging us into yet another war
/r/MensRights02/03/26 10:37 PM
-6

Oh please, no one is getting drafted anytime soon
/r/MensRights02/03/26 10:30 PM
4

If the stats are real then you should have no problem citing and posting a link to them here
/r/MensRights27/02/26 05:41 PM
3

So you don’t have statistics to back anything up. Google AI is not reliable. But since you insist. Allow me to link back to a comment in your removed CMV post. https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/s/FBxzpsH2jl
/r/MensRights27/02/26 05:35 PM
1

I would love to see the actual statistics that you think you are referencing. Looking at your profile it’s insanely obvious your dating issues are your own fault and not the result of some mystical chad
/r/MensRights27/02/26 05:28 PM
1

You literally just said it again. You are assuming that someone who is good looking will treat women poorly. Makes me think the problem isn’t “chads” but a you problem
/r/MensRights27/02/26 05:21 PM
-1

I like your assumption that just because a guy is good looking, that he’s automatically somehow not a good guy
/r/MensRights27/02/26 05:13 PM
-6

“The ability to speak does not make one intelligent” - qui gon jinn
/r/MensRights23/02/26 10:00 PM
1

lol they deleted is as soon as I questioned who filed for the PFA. Either the mom did, which assuming all this is true, would make sense with why the guns were removed from the house, a PFA was issued, and all the details. Or the dad was so fearful for his life that he removed the guns from the house, got a restraining order, and continued to live with the person he was afraid was going to kill him? Nah, definitely not buying it and op definitely was doing some really shitty writing
/r/MensRights20/02/26 07:39 PM
1

So let me see if I have all the facts straight. All this happened when OP was 8. OP’s house had guns removed from them. One of OP’s parents filed for and was granted a restraining order. So who filed the restraining order? Let’s look at what’s been presented to us. Let’s assume it was mom. She has claimed abuse and that she had a gun pointed at her head. This would result in both a PFA being granted as well as forfeiting firearms. It’s common in domestic violence cases. Let’s assume Dad. Dad was…
/r/MensRights20/02/26 07:36 PM
1

Yeah I’m not buying it at all. 8 year olds can tell when parents are fighting, but all the specific details they are claiming don’t make sense. It seems to me that they were told these things later and are taking it as gospel. Claiming to know for a fact some of these details seems suspicious at best Edit: also the gun thing has piqued my interest. They remove guns from the house in cases of domestic violence, which gives credence to the mom being abused
/r/MensRights20/02/26 07:02 PM
3

And you know all of this at the time when you were 8
/r/MensRights20/02/26 06:48 PM
3

Well that escalated quickly. How do you know your mom wasn’t abused or the things that she said happened, happened?
/r/MensRights20/02/26 06:43 PM
1

Well that’s quite a made up thing you created there
/r/MensRights19/02/26 06:18 PM
-4

I’m confused. Do you think women can’t be harassed by men who can’t wipe their own asses? I have a lot of family member of both sexes who work in various medical roles in hospitals, and I assure you, they do get harassed. Like a lot of times. Sexual harassment is not the same thing as sexual assault. You do realize that right? Cause based off your comments I don’t think you do.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 03:35 AM
0

No it’s not and claiming it is detracts from any conversation that would be had about it
/r/MensRights15/02/26 10:32 PM
1

Ok.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 04:53 PM
0

I mean toxic feminism also exists? And your response is just silly. I am a guy, and no I’m not bigoted towards me. That’s just idiotic. Those jerks are toxic as fuck and try to push their brand of masculinity on the world as if it’s gospel. Ergo, toxic masculinity
/r/MensRights06/02/26 03:42 PM
-4

That’s just not true and denying that it exists is simply sticking your head in the sand. All the macho, alpha, manosphere bullshit and the likes of Andrew Tate are prime examples of toxic masculinity
/r/MensRights05/02/26 06:00 PM
9

What the actual fuck are you going on about?
/r/MensRights04/02/26 10:01 PM
-4

This did not happen
/r/MensRights03/02/26 05:49 PM
0

lol I would love to see where you lot keep coming across all these women who say society doesn’t need men or that all men should die, I have yet to come across anyone saying that in real life
/r/MensRights22/01/26 06:27 PM
0

What a weird thing to say
/r/MensRights22/01/26 06:15 PM
2

I mean the title and the last paragraph are blatantly disparaging towards women. So there’s that.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 06:11 PM
-11

Wow. Just wow. This subreddit is totally not sexist at all 🙄
/r/MensRights22/01/26 03:57 PM
0

lol who the fuck is chopping wood these days? Edit: and if you’re needing to continuously chop wood, chances are you’re using a wood splitter
/r/MensRights20/01/26 03:50 PM
6

The majority of households are made up of both couples working full time jobs.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 03:47 PM
1

What prompt did you use to get this response
/r/MensRights14/01/26 03:07 PM
-10

Cool story
/r/MensRights12/01/26 03:39 PM
1

Well for one, the table you are referencing the 22% from only goes to 2022 as the note at the bottom even says the table was prepared in November 2023. So comparing those to the number in the workforce for the year 2024 doesn’t make sense because it’s 2 years out of date
/r/MensRights06/01/26 01:56 PM
1

Did you even read your own article? Let me provide some highlights, and they literally counter your entire argument. Diving into the data, the gender gap appears to be largely driven by the industries that are currently hiring. The industries adding the most entry-level headcount, such as healthcare, human resources, hospitality, and retail, are female-dominated and together account for over half of all entry-level job postings. The exception is technology, a male-dominated industry where women …
/r/MensRights06/01/26 12:03 AM
1

I have read the comments, as well as yours and the industry numbers don’t match what you are saying. I have done plenty of hiring for dev teams at multiple fortune 50 companies. I have stood up entire dev teams. What you are saying is just not true, and OP is simply looking for somewhere to direct their frustration at the market, even if it’s directed at the wrong group.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 06:42 PM
0

Ive heard people say HR are told to ask easier questions to female applicants? That’s not how the hiring process works
/r/MensRights05/01/26 12:59 PM
-27

No, I’m thinking no one should. I don’t know what any conversation happened that night. What I know is OP of the article admitted they said things about female faculty’s looks and they got “ostracized” for it. I’m a guy and have seen plenty of guys escalate conversations like this to an uncomfortable level
/r/MensRights05/01/26 04:37 AM
-11

Sure. And we have only their account. Back when I was in college I had been in conversations where plenty of guys got drunk, read the situation a certain way, and overshared to an extremely uncomfortable extent and then tried to defend themselves despite us telling him how fucking awkward it was.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 04:33 AM
4

This isn’t a men vs women thing. The tech market is fucked right now for a bunch of reasons, especially for juniors. The primary is a perfect storm of a few things coming to a head. 1) Companies over extended themselves during COVID and we are seeing a major course correction. Companies are either laying people off or just not hiring right now. 2) Companies have heavily invested in AI. As a senior dev, I’m not at all concerned about AI taking my job. AI is just a tool. Nothing more. But a lot of…
/r/MensRights05/01/26 04:18 AM
-38

The anonymous person in the article admitted they went out, got drunk, and started talking about female faculty’s appearances. Actions, meet consequences.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 04:02 AM
-39

I mean based on the person who wrote the articles own admission, they went out, got drunk, and engaged in discussions about female faculty’s looks. Sure, the writer said there were women sharing details, and what he says are explicit details. But he also made inappropriate comments towards female faculty. What the fuck else did they expect to happen?
/r/MensRights05/01/26 03:57 AM
0

Or hear me out, calling a woman a cow has been an insult for a really long fucking time.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 07:27 PM
-1

Wait, so you are trying to discuss divorce and custody laws? Now this makes even less sense
/r/MensRights04/01/26 07:25 PM
-1

This is a bunch of nonsense. Progressives fight for children all the time. I’d love to know how they “treat the hatred of children as a fashionable accessory”
/r/MensRights04/01/26 03:57 PM
2

Well reading this post, it’s pretty obvious why you’re single and can’t get a date. And it’s not your looks
/r/MensRights04/01/26 03:48 PM
2

Children have their tonsils out all the time and the doctors aren’t usually asking children for consent or explaining risks to the children, they’re talking to their legal guardian. There does need to be a discussion around bodily autonomy, but if you’re going to make an argument, it needs to be better than this
/r/MensRights03/01/26 10:16 PM
-8

People can die getting their tonsils taken out
/r/MensRights02/01/26 08:33 PM
-8

What does feminism have to do with circumcision? That doesn’t even make sense
/r/MensRights02/01/26 03:56 PM
1

What does this have to do with men’s rights?
/r/MensRights31/12/25 09:08 PM
2

This is just cringy as fuck that you’re doubling down on an obviously made up scenario
/r/MensRights31/12/25 09:03 PM
2

If you believe this story then you’re extremely gullible
/r/MensRights31/12/25 09:01 PM
1

Well this is a wildly toxic mindset to have
/r/MensRights31/12/25 12:47 PM
-4

I mean, abuse in the adult film industry is pretty widely known. I think the discussion around the exploitation in porn is surrounding those who see no other means to survive and the bosses knowing it, thus subjecting them to abuse. And it is generally done by men at rates much higher than women. With the rise of OnlyFans, there is no such boss, they make their own schedules, do exactly what they want, and can get out whenever they want, and aren’t subject to the whims of someone else who knows …
/r/MensRights29/12/25 09:06 PM
1

Rereading this whole thing again. Based on your aggressive responses and what you were arrested for. I’m guessing your daughter wasn’t “stolen” but you were deemed not fit for a parent. Someone who does something this incoherently stupid and then claims it’s “satire”, they may have a point. You point out everything else on the cover as being satire, which would probably be true, but putting the judges face in a rifle reticle is the definition of incitement and absolutely recklessness These were …
/r/MensRights26/12/25 10:15 PM
3

Yes. You are a moron. The reticle over a judges Face is in fact threatening. The fact that you’re a father doesn’t make this a family court issue. Even morons can reproduce. There is no satire or humor behind this. Just someone showing desire to shoot a sitting judge Edit: also trying to hock your book just screams of grifting.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 04:09 PM
2

This has to be a troll comment right?
/r/MensRights23/12/25 07:49 PM
0

Hoes, skanks, the use of the word Females in the title. OP wonders why people don’t take him seriously
/r/MensRights23/12/25 04:42 PM
0

What are his teachers doing that make this worse? What online content is he consuming? Is he on social media?
/r/MensRights21/12/25 03:38 AM
1

Yes. Women can rape me. Yes, I think if a woman falsely accuses a man of sexual assault and it’s proven that’s what she did, she should face punishment. Yes, I believe the sexual assault registry should show both men and women (it does in the US). And Yes, the app OP is suggesting is still an awful idea.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:20 PM
1

No, I do care. I’ve pointed out practical reasons over and over again why this app is a terrible idea. Having some random ass person keeping a database of people’s personal information and hosting a website to doxx people is a bad idea. Everyone here agrees that the Tea app and AWDTSG is a bad idea. This is in the same vein as both of those.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:14 PM
1

It’s an American website with traffic that is predominantly American so that’s my bad with the assumption. In that case, yes, it is a problem that they only have the registry for male offenders
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:11 PM
1

What countries are you talking about. That could help drive the conversation in a productive manner
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:48 AM
0

Oh I’m so sorry I was “radio silence”. I have a life outside of Reddit. But the fact that you take someone not responding on Reddit for 3 hours as radio silence says a lot about you
/r/MensRights19/12/25 01:43 AM
0

That’s not what OP is suggesting. He’s not suggesting a registry like that. He’s suggesting anyone be able to put information into his random ass database that I wouldn’t trust to know how to actually secure said database.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 10:26 PM
-2

Oh that’s easy. Creating an app like this, and undoubtedly the subsequent fallout in the media, would be a detriment to advancing men rights issues by giving fuel that MRA’s are fine with doxxing and harassing sexual assault survivors
/r/MensRights18/12/25 10:23 PM
1

When and where have I defended the tea app or are we dating the same guy?
/r/MensRights18/12/25 10:15 PM
0

I don’t know why this is so hard for you to understand. The sex offender registry is for people convicted of crimes by the state, and in the US by a jury of their peers. What the actual fuck are you talking about gendered databases? I’m against BOTH. These types of apps only cause way more problems than they solve.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 10:14 PM
1

What rules have I broken?
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:54 PM
-5

It was within the first 24 hours.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:53 PM
3

Um, at least in the US you can look up any registered sex offender regardless of gender
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:50 PM
0

You said they should ban remanding people awaiting trial outright. Full stop. There are ways to reduce the strain and better the conditions. Banning the ability to remand people is not fucking one of them
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:47 PM
-8

Says the guy following my account around. It was called the Teaborn app. It was banned because it was sharing photos of revenge porn and minors.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:42 PM
0

I don’t support the torture of anyone. The underlying issue you brought up about inhumane conditions is a massive problem that needs rectified and SHOULD be brought up. But you undermined your own cause by saying no one should be detained pre trial which anyone with a brain understands why that’s fucking stupid. I’m here because there are men’s rights issues that should be discussed that don’t boil down to “WOMEN BAAAAAD!”
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:40 PM
-7

There’s no male tea app equivalent because everyone who used it shared revenge porn and it had to be taken down.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:36 PM
5

I’m pretty sure this was what someone’s response app to the tea app became and why they had to shut it down
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:34 PM
0

Congrats. You posted our thread from earlier. Nothing about what I said earlier say I don’t care about innocent men or women. I said that letting everyone be out on the streets pre trial is fucking stupid and goes against public safety. This is not the own you think it is. It’s just as idiotic. And you have brought nothing to the discussion this thread is about
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:32 PM
0

Feel free to read my other reply. I am married now so it matters even less to me now. When I was dating, it never even crossed my mind to wonder if the person I was going on a date with would falsely accuse me of sexual assault. This app idea is outright dangerous and goes against every bit of ethics a developer SHOULD have, because any developer worth a damn understands the liability involved with this idea. This will harm real sexual assault victims. Period. This will hurt innocent people. Per…
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:12 PM
-2

Some get shot, some get wounded then arrested, and some put down their guns and let themselves be arrested. And what question? Supporting torturing citizens? I didn’t answer because it’s an idiotic take. I prefer public safety.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 06:43 PM
0

In the US…quite often.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 06:35 PM
-1

So if someone is arrested while shooting up a building or something, they should be allowed to leave prison while awaiting trial since legally, they haven’t been found guilty yet? Seems problematic.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 06:28 PM
-11

Yep this is exactly it. And that’s beside the fact that it would violate privacy laws in a lot of places
/r/MensRights18/12/25 06:23 PM
0

Because, contrary to what people seem to think around here, a not guilty verdict doesn’t automatically mean a false accusation. So say someone was raped, went to court, but didn’t have enough evidence to get a conviction. Then the defendant goes on your website, adds the person to said registry, using the court case as “evidence” and now a rape victim is having to live with their rapist parading it around for the world that they got away with it. Likewise, in the case of something like sexual ha…
/r/MensRights18/12/25 06:15 PM
-8

This is a terrible idea.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 06:08 PM
-4

This is not even close to the most important article to read today let alone this month. What I see is a disgruntled employee who couldn’t move up and looked for someone else to blame. Yes, some companies have taken to having weirdly extreme DEI trainings, I’ve been a part of them. But there’s definitely a bias there. And yes, the numbers show a dramatic shift. But there’s a quote that is wildly important, and I say this as a straight white male. And the quote is about different people choosing …
/r/MensRights17/12/25 05:10 PM
0

I don’t think virtually anyone getting an abortion in the 3rd trimester is doing it because they want to. It’s usually because something has gone catastrophically wrong and is usually medically necessary.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:30 PM
-2

Women have unrestricted access in some countries not all. They should have that unrestricted access because of the risk to their own personal wellbeing and health. Safe haven laws are a great thing. And this is just false about adoption. Pretty much every state has laws requiring attempted notice to the biological father of intent to put up for adoption. Likewise some states do have registries for men to sign up for that tells the state their intention to adopt the child.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:26 PM
-6

Your original comment does not contain the word many. You made a generalization about all women, then tried to back pedal when called out.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 04:42 PM
-17

It’s extremely misogynistic to suggest that women’s only value is their ability to have babies. Like, this statement is the very definition of misogyny. So if a woman is sterile, then by your definition they are worthless.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 04:37 PM
-28

And people wonder why this subreddit is called misogynistic
/r/MensRights12/12/25 04:08 PM
-4

What an absolutely asinine take. It is believed that the height of a woman’s life is to get married way to pull that out of your ass. but when you say that you're never going to do that... Oh, man. They HATE your guts (as if they didn't already). They see that and think, "Oh, no. He thinks he's too good to get married. He's taking away someone's opportunity! No one says any of these things and just screams of chronically online. Likewise, pretty much every household has both partners working ful…
/r/MensRights10/12/25 02:21 PM
-3

Your grandpa was an abusive asshole Edit: Seriously. What kind of fucking asshole “reminds someone who’s head of the household”. Looking at this behavior and thinking “yeah, that’s how things should be” says everything about you and I hope no woman ever goes near you
/r/MensRights09/12/25 03:22 PM
-1

One could say that in reverse. If he said he knew what he was doing, expect her to believe you
/r/MensRights06/12/25 08:55 PM
-5

I’ve been circumcised my entire life and I’m almost 40. This doesn’t happen
/r/MensRights05/12/25 11:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter