TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jabbathebutt2000 Archive

View 4 posts and 21 comments by jabbathebutt2000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You can't function in a competitive social setting such as parties or nightclubs if you are emotionally unstable. You're confidence level and verbal skills is not going to go well.
/r/seduction28/08/16 04:39 AM
1

You have to understand that the PUA community has mischaracterized what it means to be Alpha. Alpha is the dominant male winner in a social group. All men compete to get the attention and respect from hot women, and that man that beats them all is considered the Alpha....and this is studied by scientists with other social animals such as Chimpanzees and wolves that have the same mating system (alpha/betas). Pretty much guys have to get women's attention and admiration by showing off their athlet…
/r/seduction28/08/16 04:38 AM
1

I said majority of women want prosocial men of high status with relative dominance towards other men. And that only neurotic women prefer the type of dominant man who is a guardian/dad type. Prosocial dominance is less about control, and more about status. It's more about popularity, fame and social worth. Most HOT women prefer that which is why they go for rich guys, comedians, musicians, athletes and etc.
/r/seduction28/08/16 04:35 AM
0

Autistic guys evolved not to spread his seed much, but use his brain for resource acquisitive skills for monogmous partners. That's why casual sex is not really meant for autistic guys. They are better off in the labs and having relationship with a geek girl perhaps.
/r/seduction28/08/16 04:31 AM
1

Hot women.
/r/seduction28/08/16 04:30 AM
1

At the bottom I implied that average girls go for emotionally stable and non-dominant guys.
/r/seduction28/08/16 04:29 AM
1

My own research into the neurobiology of female sexuality concludes this: Estrogen makes women attracted to men with high social status: ex. dominance, money, attention, fame, Testosterone makes women attracted to men with masculine physical features: ex. muscularity, big dick, masculine body shape, tall Progesterone makes women attracted to men with feminine features and behavior - kindness, social ability, feminine facial features, pretty boy looks etc (justin bieber face etc) Oxytocin makes w…
/r/seduction28/08/16 02:41 AM
1

Because there are PUA who says women naturally want men to controll her. Which is BULLSHIT lol. Woman want a PRO-SOCIAL guy who is dominant towards OTHER MEN. But that he is like a "knight" & romantic to her own needs. Get it? The only women who "want" to be controlled and lead are the NEUROTIC women. Or women who are emotionally unstable themselves, and need an adult Daddy basically.
/r/seduction28/08/16 01:54 AM
2

Dominant guys who are prosocial. Or Prosocial dominant guys like the funny guy, college sports jock, the loudmouth, guys that show off to other guys, guys that constantly fight other guys --- etc. In other words - PRO-SOCIAL ....or somehow socially involved. A lot of guys that tend to need PUA are anti-social or spent relatively amount of time on the computer and shit. They are not integrated into any functional social circles where there are lots of girls. Remember that girls want guys that can…
/r/seduction28/08/16 01:52 AM
1

No one is attracted to a person that cries whether it be a woman or man. People don't want to deal with emotional baggage. So it's rational for both men and women to be attracted to emotionally stable people.
/r/seduction28/08/16 01:48 AM
1

They fuck a variety of dudes some of whom maybe dominant or not dominant. Think about some funny guys with a masculine body shape who get's laid. Those guys are not dominant in any context, but they ARE prosocial and tend to draw attention to themselves and entertain others. And my study did note that prosociality was more important factor in attracting women than dominance.
/r/seduction28/08/16 01:47 AM
1

It's not unusual for men's rights activists to take every non-MRA data as a grain of salt. Unlike most MRAs, I take every scientific and quantitative data as fact. Either that be social science or biological science.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 01:45 AM
1

No, self-reporting from a large consensus is pretty accurate. All 10,000 men could not have internalized misandry.....and anecdotally men are also less empathetic. I mean I have met men from a diverse set of occupational sectors such as nursing, police, military, politics, business and etc, and most of them have a sort of insensitive attitude from time to time. The only time I see that men empathize with others is when they face the same situations, for instance I see too many men empathize with…
/r/MensRights28/08/16 01:42 AM
1

Also testosterone reduces empathy and men have on average 10X more testosterone. That would have been a simpler piece of evidence instead of writing a huge paragraph which you are clearly too incompetent to comprehend.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 09:18 PM
1

I don't think you even have the slightest grasp of what empathy is and how it works. Empathy is a form of mentalizing or understanding a person's subjective perspective or feeling/mimicking their emotions. (cognitive + emotional empathy). Empathy is a MENTAL CAPACITY sort of like intelligence. Doesn't mean it's always being used because life events and situations can turn on or off empathy. But men generally have lower cognitive empathy but almost always lower emotional empathy. You claim women …
/r/MensRights27/08/16 09:14 PM
1

This is not philosophy. Truth is empirical and not based on arguments nd such. We can observe truth about human psychology from brain scans, self-reports and ability tests. So no, your argument is bullcrap. And no, it's not a small sample size. It's brain scans of around 900-1000 men and women, but self-reports of 10,000 men and women. BOTH show higher female empathy. It's also based on careers that require higher empathy for instance nursing and teaching which are majority women. Also, jobs tha…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 09:06 PM
1

Yeah pretty much. Articles? You mean experimental studies? Empiricism? Men report themselves to have less empathy by the way. They also give less of a shit for social issues than women. This is just plain facts alongside the pure fact that women have more mirror neurons in the brain which is core requirement for empathy.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 04:03 PM
0

That argument doesn't work against scientific facts sorry. That's like saying argument to authority that scientists believe the moon exist.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:59 PM
1

My theory is not made up. It's based on scientific facts and experimental studies involving hundreds of people.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:57 PM
-2

I only read scientific articles. Not bullshit sorry.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 02:45 AM
-5

Nope you're response sounds like horseshit comparable to creationist pandering. I quoted several scientific evidence including brain neuroimaging, the only thing you quoted was a fucking blooggg bwahahah. Do you know how ridiculous and inferior that looks? I suggest you leave this post and go join the dumber mgtow dipshits somewhere else. I was looking for some intelligent mgtow to comment here.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 01:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter