TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jack-earnest Archive

View 0 posts and 117 comments by jack-earnest on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There has only been one side that suppressed the truth. Make sure you are not on that side.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 08:37 PM
1

Considering Socrates was condemned to drink poison for corrupting the youth of Greece. We can assume cancelling has gone on since people can write.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 08:06 PM
1

When did cancelling start?
/r/MensRights22/12/20 07:42 PM
1

I personally don’t give a shit about Eton because it has produced the people that have destroyed this country. Fight me on that point. But also when does cancelling stop, cancelling the guy who cancels the cancelling canceller?
/r/MensRights22/12/20 07:07 PM
0

Still stands is that not cancel culture rather than changing the deans mind?
/r/MensRights22/12/20 06:56 PM
1

What? Every dude is a guy in this scenario.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 06:51 PM
1

So if someone got fired for radical misandry you’d be fine about it
/r/MensRights22/12/20 06:18 PM
2

Cancel culture.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 06:17 PM
-1

What’s the rest? Dictionary definition a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. I can understand that the last point may be applied to Antifa in America. But the rest I don’t see applying.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 02:10 AM
-1

Good bot
/r/MensRights22/12/20 02:08 AM
-13

First line of the Wiki description: “Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism” is that what Antifa is where you are?
/r/MensRights22/12/20 01:39 AM
-13

Wait. Is your version of Men’s Rights pro fascist?
/r/MensRights21/12/20 09:22 PM
15

And yet they didn’t withhold funds when boys were being sexually assaulted for five years.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 06:51 PM
1

There’s one thing we can all agree on. Child grooming is done largely by men. They clearly can’t control themselves around children and should be banned from being in close quarters with them or frankly just deport them if they can’t assimilate culturally. /s
/r/MensRights21/12/20 12:10 AM
1

Well it’s a good thing the only time children have been groomed was that one time in Rotherham. Citing the same three cases that have had a high media profile doesn’t mean you’re right or that’s all that’s happening out there. You don’t see every grooming gang story but the data from conviction rates shows a better picture of what’s actually happening. I’d argue the biggest chaos in this country has been caused by conservative politicians with shambolic handling of COVID resulting the highest de…
/r/MensRights20/12/20 08:53 PM
1

You asked who they are made up of and I linked to who the majority is. Possible over representation in a certain demographic doesn’t answer your question of who it is. If you’re feeling inclusive we can just be gendered and say it’s men.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 04:35 PM
14

Why is it not a surprise?
/r/MensRights18/12/20 11:35 AM
8

What’s the difference when people say toxic femininity?
/r/MensRights18/12/20 11:33 AM
1

Mostly young white guys
/r/MensRights17/12/20 09:48 AM
2

That’s what the law makers go on to explain. But they add something like ‘and this includes girls and women’ and that’s what the Daily Mail cling to.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 09:47 AM
3

Instantly suspicious because it’s the Daily Mail a newspaper that is no longer allowed to be a source of information on Wikipedia because it’s so consistently wrong or lying with misleading titles for shock value. Half way down the article: 'We must also recognise that some women and girls may be complicit in this offending which is why our expert prosecutors are trained to look at the evidence provided by police to identify when prosecution is appropriate.' But she added that the guidance was n…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 08:51 AM
2

Yeah, I’m all up for equality. I just don’t like tarring a global movement with the brush of the outliers. Otherwise I would have left this sub long ago, but there are still important things that need to be done for men.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 12:58 AM
2

If the assertion that “there is no gender pay gap” is false would you not be then arguing for a higher pay for men for the same jobs? I’ve never heard a feminists say they should be paid more than men. I don’t know you’ll have to tell me about this very specific law in a single country. Do you think some places around the world would still benefit from feminism?
/r/MensRights17/12/20 12:19 AM
2

So not caring about being labelled as a chauvinist, means you don’t think MRA is a movement looking for equality and quite happy being called a male supremacist?
/r/MensRights16/12/20 07:01 PM
2

Not really, otherwise what’s stopping people calling MRA, Chauvinists?
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:17 PM
0

Misandrist Statement*
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:30 PM
1

Use quotes because I never said that. That’s you’re interpretation. I didn’t mention police. You did. I just want to know what liberals are saying black people are being hunted and killed, give me a name, give me an article, give me a tweet. and what facts and statistics do you have that prove that statement wrong. I have different sources. I’m not repeating the same one. And I still don’t know where you got 10-13 unarmed black people a year. Is that a percentage? Is that a number? Thank you.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 07:00 PM
1

You’re posting in Men’s Rights. Men’s rights is looking for social reform. You’re an SJW.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 06:55 PM
1

I just don't know how we can solve the problem or even how to frame it.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 04:16 PM
2

Curious about the context. The conversation seems to end at Women get less time, but someone hands out that time. Is it female policy makers favouring their own gender? But if it's judges most of them are men, so men are giving other men more time and letting women off.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 03:45 PM
0

And you still haven't said where you get the 10-13 figure from. If you don't like that source because you believe it's datasets are faulty or misleading because it is crowdsourced. Here is another one from a peer reviewed paper which still gets to the conclusion that as an unarmed black person you are still more likely to be shot than your unarmed white or hispanic counterparts. If you're exactly pulling the data from this set you can say we have a recorded on average 13 unarmed black people per…
/r/MensRights03/12/20 02:49 PM
0

liberals like to pretend black people are being hunted and arrested or murdered for no reason other than the color of their skin which is not only unfounded and ludicrous but also disproven by stats and factual data. It's your "moronic" sentiment you need to back up. What liberals are pretending this and what are the stats and factual data that disproves them? I've asserted nothing to the contrary. What is the 10-13 in relation to? The entire US or per million? A particular state? Because 237 ha…
/r/MensRights03/12/20 12:57 PM
-1

It’s fairly common on Reddit for users to ask for a source to a claim by literally just saying “source”. In this case, yes I want a source to prove that black people are not literally hunted down in the street and murdered or arrested for no reason.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 11:33 AM
1

I see that men do get harsher sentence than women. But who’s doing it?
/r/MensRights03/12/20 09:23 AM
0

Thank you.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 08:51 AM
-12

Source. Edit: getting downvoted for wanting to see these stats and factual data?
/r/MensRights03/12/20 12:21 AM
12

So it’s an institutional justice problem? Who’s making these decisions to give men more time for the same crimes?
/r/MensRights03/12/20 12:20 AM
3

To a tune of 98% of all rape cases brought forward do not end in conviction (UK 2020) and those are the ones brought forward, a lot of victims of rape will not press charges at all.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 01:28 PM
0

How is this specifically a men’s rights issue? This is personal accountability that applies to everyone of every gender. The post reminds me of those MySpace posts you saw as a teenager that was trying to call out one specific person while being vague about it. Prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 11:18 AM
1

Your point was to punish female fake accusers and protect male victims, assuming the reverse cannot happen.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 03:47 PM
1

False accusations are a very small percentage which we really don’t know the number for estimated ~2-10% in the US. As a man you’re more likely to get raped than be accused of rape. And for comparison 98%of all rape cases do not end in conviction in the UK.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 03:24 PM
1

So because it’s such a low percentage it doesn’t matter?
/r/MensRights26/11/20 03:12 PM
1

Women do receive false accusations, women do serve time for sexual assault crimes. It’s not gendered that’s my point. You’re saying it is gendered. I don’t understand how this is an MR issue and not just an issue of Justice.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 02:41 PM
1

Ok, so you’re stating as fact that there is no law for woman around sexual assault and a woman cannot go to jail for sexual assaulting a man. While as a man every time you are accused or do commit a felony such as rape or sexual assault you serve a lengthy jail sentence. Or are you being hyperbolic?
/r/MensRights26/11/20 02:00 PM
0

You said, “how there is no laws to protect men for FAKE rape accusations” and you go on to say “it’s obvious that woman has way more privileges than men today and something really needs to happen.” In this specific case how are they more privileged? Are there laws protecting them if they are accused of rape/ sexual assault or do we just see more instances of false accusation from women about men? What is stopping you as a man falsely accusing a woman of sexual assault?
/r/MensRights26/11/20 01:46 PM
-1

So there isn’t a law for gendered accusations. It’s perceived police prejudice and you feel coming forward with a rape/ sexual assault case you will not end in a conviction.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 01:33 PM
0

Ok, so it’s a common theme on this subreddit that men are raped but it’s classed as sexual assault by law. I put both. You cherry picked from and ignored my question.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 08:14 AM
-7

Is there a law to protect women from from fake rape/ sexual assault accusations?
/r/MensRights25/11/20 11:29 PM
1

Dean Browning is that you?
/r/MensRights21/11/20 02:19 AM
1

I quoted Lisak’s criticisms but not his studies, which still do not deny that rape accusations are rare in comparison to rape. I just don’t understand this particular stream of Men’s Rights. It’s not a gendered issue, men can be raped and men can falsely accuse.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 11:41 PM
1

Again very similar critique, a tiny sample size of 109 from 1994 which is then used to generalise. It also not without its criticisms from other academics, stated by David Lisak, an associate professor of psychology and director of the Men's Sexual Trauma Research Project at the University of Massachusetts Boston. He states, "Kanin's 1994 article on false allegations is a provocative opinion piece, but it is not a scientific study of the issue of false reporting of rape. It certainly should neve…
/r/MensRights17/10/20 11:15 PM
1

It has an estimated 2%-10% false allegations but from a sample size of “(N = 136) of sexual assault reported to a major Northeastern university over a 10-year period are analyzed to determine the percentage of false allegations.” You’re still more likely to be raped than accused of rape as a man. Article
/r/MensRights17/10/20 10:43 PM
1

This one? - False Allegations of Sexual Assualt: An Analysis of Ten Years of Reported Cases
/r/MensRights17/10/20 09:14 PM
-7

Woah, woah. I in no way asserted that false accusations are devoid of harm for the accused and shouldn’t be taken seriously as far as I’m concerned it’s perjury and wasting police time but IANAL. Neither do I personally agree that men are guilty until proven innocent, which is why you’ve pointed me that thread I assume. Just accusations of rape are rare in comparison to rape. I also don’t understand why this is specifically a Men’s issue but willing to hear out.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 08:26 PM
-10

This paper would only be relevant if I had explicitly stated “2%” and in the Edward Greer’s (2000) own words “... interpretation of some data, now a quarter- century old” as this citing court cases from 1995 and laws that have been update. For example Greer speculated that in the future rape cases may be brought forward on the grounds of lack of consent rather than specific non consent and even goes as far as “no” can sometimes means “yes”, which would not stand trial in modern day California. T…
/r/MensRights17/10/20 07:52 PM
-23

I mean, they are still rare in comparison to the amount of rapes that occur. Doesn’t justify them but they are rare.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 06:44 PM
4

So my issues with this is that it’s on going, “story until now”. As a system of law we must presume innocent until proven guilty and we must allow the system to carry out its form of Justice and then if we feel justice has not been properly upheld we can revolt against it. The woman has not accused the man of rape or that the sexual intercourse wasn’t consensual, she is saying that he took photos and videos of her, while she was unconscious without her consent and wants them deleted. Hard to pro…
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:45 AM
21

I know. Just a bit of a joke from the “not all men” thing a few years ago. It’s not the first, won’t be the last even with background checks and borders. Most people are raped by people they know. But no one can distance themselves from friends and family. And you can’t account for random attacks. People just need to stop raping each other. Edit: I’ve just gone and done it. I’ve stopped everyone from raping each other forever by typing this.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 08:24 PM
12

notallmigrants
/r/MensRights16/05/20 08:14 PM
5

I disagree. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46207304
/r/MensRights10/05/20 08:42 AM
3

It's not in the manifesto that I know of. As much as I know its a bit of a misquote from Goebbels 1934 Nuremberg address "The cleverest trick used in propaganda against Germany during the war was to accuse Germany of what our enemies themselves were doing." but these things happen and every political side is inconsistent. The article above proves that about the moderate left and there are examples for the right too. No worries, it happens to all of us. Me included.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 12:53 PM
3

You’re not quoting Marx. That’s a quote from Goebbels. Thought we were just having fun like “May the force be with you, Harry Potter” - Abraham Lincoln
/r/MensRights06/05/20 11:51 AM
4

The rightist mantra: "What's-a matter you? Hey! Gotta no respect. What-a you t'ink you do? Why you look-a so sad? It's-a not so bad, it's-a nice-a place. Ah, shaddap-a you face!" - Richard Nixon
/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:18 AM
14

It’s behind a paywall for me but assuming these men are not being vilified but in fact praised for their actions and contribution?
/r/MensRights30/04/20 09:56 AM
4

Agreed. Even more so for working class men and men of colour.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 10:40 AM
-3

You can believe things that aren’t true, and it’s harder to believe things that have little to no evidence other than their word against another. But both sides need to be considered truthful until proven otherwise. That’s what I take from “believe all women” movement anyway. In this subreddit it would be “believe all men” in the cases of things like custody of children through a divorce or male victims sexual abuse. Although as we know the courts are not always the beacon of justice and fall on…
/r/MensRights16/04/20 08:31 AM
3

In America, yeah he could still win because it’s pretty much a two party country and you end up having to choose between the lesser of two evils.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 10:37 AM
9

Honestly, I can’t think of a politician that could stand up to these things and survive. Especially since a lot of these are a poor mans problem and it shows a kind of “weakness” or “sensitivity” that won’t get you voted in. You’re more likely to be voted in if you are the rapist.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 08:32 AM
2

The cultural concept of how aspects of traditionally perceived masculinity is harmful.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 12:51 PM
1

So what are we doing about it?
/r/MensRights05/06/19 08:52 AM
-14

Yes, comrade!
/r/MensRights24/05/19 11:31 PM
2

Thank you, I don’t mind too much since “Shroom privilege” mostly balanced it out. Hahaha
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:41 PM
2

Ok, I’m just not getting the irony of it in this case.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:32 PM
2

Thank for the answer, I’m still not sure how it relates to these specific statistics. I think a clearer one would have been; Male privilege be like: 80% of children sole custody cases are won by women. ???
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:08 PM
13

Shroom privilege
/r/MensRights23/05/19 11:13 AM
9

Ok cool. I’m thinking privileges are like blue turtle shells in Mario Kart, if you’re already last ones not going to help you get first, maybe up one or two positions. But if you start off first and have a lot of them you can probably keep your lead.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:51 AM
-17

What’s this got do with the concept of male privilege? I don’t understand what male privilege is, especially in relation to those statistics.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:31 AM
-7

Yeah you used a societal and cultural analogy to incorrectly describe an individualistic problem. It was just a long winding road of saying someone without common sense is responsible for their own rape. Which is still victim blaming.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 03:08 PM
-7

It’s still victim blaming. You could just not rape or attack someone.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 02:51 PM
2

8/10 rape cases are perpetrated by someone the victim knows. And I don’t know why you’re just attaching rape to being a female exclusive crime. Men can be raped too, would you tell them the same thing?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 02:07 PM
2

Isn’t this what people describe as “Toxic Masculinity”?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 11:45 AM
1

Are Men’s rights looking for equality?
/r/MensRights07/05/19 02:41 PM
1

Nah, I’m done feeding you.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 06:15 PM
1

Poor baby, really are showing that wisdom doesn’t come with age.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 12:14 PM
1

D-, you knew some things but didn’t provide sources, you didn’t read the material and your conclusion wasn’t clear. See me after class.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 05:41 AM
1

Cool, so you have no evidence and just pulling shit out your ass and unwilling to look at any other evidence. You might as well stick your fingers in your ears and start screaming. “Why not be poor someone where else?...” When you pull your head out your ass let me know.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 11:30 PM
1

I’m providing evidence. You’re bringing nothing but childish comments. Per my last comment. Physically it affects everyone the same given the same situations. But social situations means that those in poverty are exposed to more pollution than the rich. I’ve proved my case several. You just need to put on your half moon reading glasses, deary.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:48 PM
1

pollution and climate disaster is really going to affect us equally, I am just too young and dumb.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:24 PM
1

I’m so young, that clearly I’ve not had enough experience to realise the $3.8bn Dakota Access Pipeline is affecting the ultra rich in the area.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:21 PM
1

yeah, I guess I’m too young to remember all the millionaires that live in Flint, MI who haven’t had clean drinking water in years
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:15 PM
1

well I guess I’m just wrong that pollution affects the poor more than the rich
/r/MensRights04/05/19 09:57 PM
1

that one is really gonna hurt
/r/MensRights04/05/19 09:51 PM
1

oh boy you got me again
/r/MensRights04/05/19 09:46 PM
1

oh boy you really got me
/r/MensRights04/05/19 09:13 PM
1

In the case of pollution, it affects everyone’s physiology the same but it affects us differently socially. Usually a class divide of rich and poor where the poor And working class will be exposed to more pollution than the rich. Anything brought forward without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. I’m not doing your homework for you, if you make a point you need to back it up. Ok then, you senile old bastard, we can just sling insults at each other. Since you stated that AA helps minorit…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 09:09 PM
1

They want a job.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 08:17 PM
1

Either women have the right to work as septic dump truck drivers or they don’t. A: They do.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:59 PM
1

Earlier you were against those practices in cases of pollution. Maybe a business seems that it should be allowed to pollute a certain amount that to survive. And that’s against your definition of capitalism. It’s a freedom to trade not freedom to hire. So that’s a no, you have no example of businesses being forced to hire someone against their will? Rather than insults, men should be able to have a conversation without trying to demean each other. That statement doesn’t say anything about gender…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:12 PM
1

I have, I just wanted to make sure. No where in any of those quotes, does it talk about freedom to hire as an essential requirement for capitalism to exist. It’s all about who owns the means of production and who can buy and sell and at what price. Do you have an example or a company being forced to hire someone? There’s also a paper that says that AA hasn’t had an affect on overall quality at all, and in some cases quality has increased. Men of colour also fit in with that category too so not s…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 05:56 PM
1

Just to check, these are official definitions and not your opinion?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 05:09 PM
0

I realise that, but in a free market, the free part applies to the market as a whole trading nationally and internationally not the freedom of companies diversity hiring policies.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:39 PM
0

Not my point. AA still exists within a free market. It doesn’t stop it being a free market economy. Trying to balance is the official stance, it’s subjective to opinion to whether it’s beneficial or not depending on what kind of outcome you’re looking to achieve with it.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:26 PM
2

I’ve so far only found one example of her being a feminist and that was campaigning to change the definition of sexual assault to just mean rape. It came about when 5 guys calling themselves wolves planned to drug and rape women at a street festival and they did, orally, vaginally and anally and they were only charged with sexual assault because the judges said the victim was “submissive” and didn’t resist, even suggesting she was enjoying it. That sounds like a lot of the guys stories I’ve hear…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:13 PM
1

I’ve mentioned mostly because it comes up in conversations about Scottish independence and it’s reentry into the European Union as its one of the criteria. In terms of affirmative action that’s not a slight against free market capitalism since that’s a state of how an economy is run, unless you’re in a socialist economy or mixed economy, you’re likely to be in a free market economy. Affirmative action looks at trying to balance out hiring practices rightly or wrongly. That would refute meritocra…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:02 PM
2

A point of view is established from experiences and/or presented information. Either you can explain you’re just not willing to. Or you can’t and creating winding arguments like “if a tree falls in the wood is anyone around to hear it? explain that!” As a basis to explain why men dominate some professions.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:28 PM
0

Rather than explaining you’ve gone for patronising.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:56 PM
-1

Age in perspective. If you’re like 60, Yes I’m young. if you’re 20 I’m older than you. Don’t know what my age has to do with it. But can anyone tell what she’s doing that has been considered radical?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:26 PM
-4

Women have the right to be that if they want to. Is that not more of an issue for free market capitalism and PR of why aren’t women attracted to these jobs? It’s only really an equality issue if only men were allowed to do the job but women are denied but had the capacity physically to accomplish it. Kind of like early astronauts.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:03 PM
2

Free market capitalism
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:31 PM
0

Yeah, I will tell women to not worry about your shape and size, don’t worry about shaving or your hobbies for not being girly enough you’re still a woman. Men cover half the demographic, but sure if every other demographic is telling you you’re not part of a demographic because you’re not conforming to a stereotype I will tell them that’s wrong.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 12:08 AM
0

I’ll totally agree that stereotypes and generalisations are offensive and unhelpful. Muslim isn’t a race but sure, I don’t expect Muslims to come out in crowds to say “we’re not like the bad guys” #notallmuslims this is very whataboutery, what about blacks, what about women, what about Muslims. Address the problem and grow.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:58 PM
0

Race and gender are such different things that can’t be compared like this.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:09 PM
-1

I get the general premise of being able to swap in something to the same argument to try and prove wrong. I could swap in “doctors are so smug, too many doctors think it’s ok to vaccinate my child, some doctors are good but not enough. Doctors need to be better etc.” If we’re talking biologically no, since we don’t need to hold onto sperm for nine months before we can get another woman pregnant. And keeping someone around to protect and provide is the opposite of disposable.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 10:37 PM
-4

Are you saying both stereotypes are correct?
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:31 PM
4

What’s this got to do with Men’s Rights?
/r/MensRights18/01/19 06:46 PM
-17

It’s racist to say that Black people are the only race committing crimes, it’s not incorrect the vast majority of sexual crimes against women will be by straight men. But if there is a community predominantly black that is committing a disproportionate amount of criminal activity you have an investigation into why that is and try to change the instances of why that is. There no instance (as far as I know) within black culture that says to be black you must commit crimes. But within hyper-masculi…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 03:44 PM
-1

You wouldn’t say any of those things makes a woman more feminine. I think the idea of ‘toxic masculinity’ comes from certain traits that people consider masculine can be mentally harmful.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter