TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jack_gats Archive

View 14 posts and 216 comments by jack_gats on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
188

jack_gats/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:06 PM
123

jack_gats/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:28 AM
71

jack_gats/r/MensRights21/03/13 08:13 AM
38

jack_gats/r/MensRights23/01/13 12:35 PM
35

jack_gats/r/MensRights13/03/13 12:49 PM
34

jack_gats/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:20 AM
17

jack_gats/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:36 AM
7

jack_gats/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:08 AM
7

jack_gats/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:19 PM
3

jack_gats/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:56 AM
0

jack_gats/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:53 AM
0

jack_gats/r/MensRights11/02/13 08:10 AM
0

jack_gats/r/MensRights20/02/13 07:33 AM
0

jack_gats/r/MensRights21/03/13 01:23 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

From where mothers get banned?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:01 AM
3

Unfortunately calls for censorship are mostly directed at the more realistic end of the market.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:11 AM
6

Fact is, women are often envious of other women who make themselves financially independent instead of relying on taxpayer's money. The envy is particularly strong regarding the so-called "sex" professions. I call it "policing of the sexual market".
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:06 AM
5

Of course, one man’s sexual assault is another man’s sexual fantasy come true. She's not wrong, but then it applies to both sexes. What I find revolting is her bandying about of figures pulled out of her fat, lazy feminist arse: We do instinctively think of sexual assault as something done to women by men because the stats bear that out: 90 per cent of victims are female and 99 per cent of the offenders are male.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 01:23 PM
-3

Raping an identified man to get pregnant and later claim alimony would be a logical thing to do from a feminist point of view. Of course women have been doing this all the time consensually, but with men becoming more careful you can expect an up-tick of forcible impregnations.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:31 PM
-11

Could it be that many women get into massage with a plan to diversify into the more lucrative rub & tug business? Note that when it comes to chartered physiotherapists, chiropractors etc. most (and the best) are male.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 03:04 PM
1

And also what they sound like! Vociferous hags!
/r/MensRights05/04/13 03:00 PM
1

Only if HE is the one terminating the contract, ie filing for divorce. Once you start making allowances that look good on paper, like "helping her on her feet etc.", you usher in all sorts of exceptions ("in cases of DV" etc.). And before long men find themselves paying all their lives as ever.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:54 PM
2

There should be NO alimony after divorce. If you need the man's money, don't get divorced, period. (If you need an employer's money, don't quit your job).
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:55 AM
34

When a Muslim in the Middle-East does something similar to his cheating wife, the whole World gets outraged. We've been liberated from the Talibans but who will free us from the Talibettes?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:55 PM
2

Since there's no sound definition of rape any more, any attempt to educate people about rape will only miseducate them.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 01:49 PM
1

What is more, while women have two X chromosomes, men have just one, ‘wimpy’, Y. Wrong, men have 22 pairs of X chromosomes + one XY pair. In her talk at the Australian Academy of Science, the professor described the remaining genes on the Y chromosome as being mostly ‘junk’. Wrong, there are as many so-called "junk" genes on the other chromosomes. The extent and significance of "junk"genes is uncertain and they will most probably turn out to be anything but junk once they're properly understood.…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:20 AM
7

Quote from the article: "I would say that there is a need for having a stringent law to act against those who make false complainants" Maybe they'll get it right in India.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:39 AM
1

There have been calls to abolish women's prisons altogether: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2006/aug/02/closedownwomensprisons
/r/MensRights28/03/13 07:54 AM
9

A retrial was ordered. What about the trial of the woman for false accusation?
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:07 PM
-2

If women are going to complain about sexual harassment or offending language, which they tend to do these days, they're better off left to stew in their own juice together. And at the end of the course they will get a certificate or a degree that has "woman" written all over it. And then they will complain employers do not value it like they value a man's degree. There's no end to the charade, you see, like the communist revolution, it's a never-ending process.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:17 AM
3

It should be a minor offence for BOTH sexes if there was no violence or harm.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:12 AM
0

It's good. Why not print the last line (Rape is not a choice you make) in bold or in larger print. It could go viral.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 04:38 PM
1

Here: http://theantifeminist.com/
/r/MensRights25/03/13 06:48 AM
3

Exactly! it would be a patriarchal orgasm, not a genuine, consented one.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:51 PM
2

An apt retort in this example would be that if a girl gets the counterpart of a boner - whatever that counterpart may be - she too was not raped. Which leads again to the finding that only a limiting, no-frills definition of rape for both sexes will work (rape must be something resisted to the best of a victim's ability). Anyone who consents to someone else going down on them should only be able to prove subsequent lack of consent by putting up a fight. Otherwise it's A's word against B's - and …
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:49 PM
1

Euh ... I think the same link was submitted already ...
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:22 PM
1

Comments are closed on all her most misandric articles. Here are other articles: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/patricia-leavy-phd/ She's a bag of shit.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:48 AM
2

I agree if it's drug consumption because then it's non-violent and victimless. In this case there's a victim. Conspiring to get someone innocent into jail should be punished by jail or the death penalty.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:18 PM
1

I don't see the problem. There isn't one. A victim's ability to resist can be zero (like any physical quantity). In which case the value to insert into the rape case equation is R = 0. No court will blame a victim for failing to resist after being knocked unconscious or otherwise incapacitated.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:22 PM
2

Same shit as ever. The article is entitled: "Translating Patriarchy in International Criminal Law". I suggest another title "Translating Patriarchy into donation money for wimmins".
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:25 PM
-1

I've said it again but it deserves repeating: the only definition of rape that will work is "sex resisted to the best of a victim's ability". You can tinker at the definition of rape as long as you want, you will only create opportunities for abuse on the part of alleged victims.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:22 PM
-1

People of both sexes should be allowed to have sex with other people they feel attracted to, period. If they're old enough to feel attracted and enjoy it, they're old enough to have it. People cannot be the victim of something they enjoy. It is a nonsequitur. Oh my God! What did I say!
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:18 PM
1

Some of them are absolutely hideous! People seldom look their best on police mug shots. Remember those mug shots of movie stars? Jenna Jameson, Hugh Grant ...
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:14 PM
3

Context aside this picture just looks like a mother and her son. Seriously? The fact that's it's incestuous to boot doesn't make it right! I know there's a silent, indeed unconscious (Bible Belt) lobby within the MM and outside, who silently consider parents should be entitled to do anything within the confines of "the family". They are the worst paedocrites of all.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 12:53 PM
-8

Moms all over the world sleep together in the same bed as their grown-up children. Moms all over the world rub themselves and their unwelcome body parts against infants and grown-up children, and that's OK, isn't it? But woe betide a father kissing his daughter! That would be paedophilia wouldn't it, let alone incest. Could you all stop being momma's boys and get your act together?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 12:51 PM
-1

It's the mother & child icon, you see, the Virgin Mary and her baby Jesus. It's enough to disarm the whole MRA army. If you want to make MM soldiers angry, give them stories of high-school students who get lucky with their teacher. That has them climb a wall.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 12:43 PM
-1

No sense in demonizing parents? Let's demonize the dirty stranger in a raincoat instead? What we are witnessing in the voting on this OP is chivalry combined with mother-worship. Beerk!
/r/MensRights15/03/13 12:38 PM
3

It's a legitimate shot at the double standard. I don't find the poster scandalous in any way in the sense that, for once, the male "victim" is a real child, not a randy teenager with a 5-inch hard-on. Plus, the child really looks like the attention is unwanted.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 12:32 PM
1

The way they use figures! Even if the figures were correct, they prove nothing. If and when women have over 50% representation in making the movies, they will contrive to announce that less than 50% of the public seeing the movies were women. This will only end the day feminism ends.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:00 PM
1

I don't read it that way. It's another case of "men do, girls are forced".
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:15 AM
1

At last a sound position by a major network. To men's rights activists: these are the real male victims of sexual violence! not the high-school students who lose their virginity to some nympho teacher!
/r/MensRights14/03/13 07:48 AM
1

Those guys were executed by crucifixion. Does that qualify as "horrible"? http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-03-04/world/37429852_1_executions-death-sentences-saudi-arabia
/r/MensRights14/03/13 06:45 AM
-18

Let me ask a question: when was it we heard of a real rape happening? I mean a plain-vanilla rape everyone would recognise as rape? If someone were teletransported from the 18th century and were presented with our "rape" cases, they would go: "which rape"? Shouldn't we have a yearly International Rape Day for men to go on a rampage and REALLY rape women to remind them what the word means? Besides if men are going to be accused of rape anyway, whatever they do and don't do, they might as well go …
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:27 PM
1

This was submitted 8 hours ago here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1a7br9/false_rape_allegations_devastating/c8ur71t?context=3
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:13 PM
4

You go out into the streets. You look at the women who stroll by and think every last one of them has the power to send you to jail. She just has to say the word (peodo, rapist, harasser etc.).
/r/MensRights13/03/13 12:46 PM
4

Typical feminist counter-attack. They will not budge an inch.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 12:40 PM
1

Uniqueness is the cheapest commodity in the universe. Each piece of rock is unique, more so even than living things.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 12:37 PM
0

You're sick and bitter Better than be a feminist.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:30 AM
1

Number 3: "They all look at attractive women. They all fantasize about having sex with other women. Even the "nice guys" do this. Once you understand that their doing so isn't a threat to your relationship, you will be much happier." Only the title is objectionable. The text is common sense.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:28 AM
1

Am I the only male here who doesn't consider these points to be wide off the mark? If this were all women think about men, things wouldn't be as bad as they are.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:23 AM
9

The title of the article is OK. But read on: "She believes false allegations aren't as common as people think" "There is a difference between 'false accusations' and 'not enough evidence'," said Dianne." "False accusations account for only 5% of all reported cases." These quotes appear towards the end of the article. Then comes the closing note: "Dianne says young women should feel sure their story will be believed when they come forward." No less, mind you. What else to expect from a well-funct…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:44 AM
1

Fact is, if you take on religion you have no credit or energy left to take on feminism (or the war-on-drugs etc.). You can only take on one societal taboo at a time.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 01:03 PM
1

We would like Dawkins to write "The Feminist Delusion" but I he is not on our side, let's say he's not an abject white knight like so many academics. But his axe to grind is definitely with religion. The reason he pays lip service to feminism is because he knows feminists (and the majority of women) are easy allies to win over against religion. Of course he gets full marks for Elevatorgate (see below) but the incident was not of his own making. And there may never be another Elevatorgate for fem…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:54 PM
2

Do you think this is something fems and MRAs agree on? What about socon MRAs? Gender roles is what existed before feminism IMO.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:51 PM
1

No to mention that if you insist there's no reason to hit a woman, you imply there may be reasons to hit a man. The statement has an implicit double standard built in.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:42 AM
4

No feminist demonstration against this kind of segregation though. What I find unacceptable is that women are given the choice between sitting among women or together with men. Something similar goes on in fitness clubs in Europe: you have one women-only sauna plus one "mixed" sauna. Men, as the suckers they're usually are, agree with this, indeed look forward to having the odd exhibitionist woman flouting her nakedness in the "mixed" sauna.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:10 AM
0

That's the next step, but remember the woman can also have her own videos and her own witnesses. It's an arms race and up to now the men have not been winning it.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:50 AM
1

Exactly. By such a definition all contracts are coercive. I bought a loaf of bread but I was coerced into paying for it. I wouldn't have paid if I hadn't been hungry. I'll sue the baker to get my money back.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:45 AM
1

This is already standard in Western Europe. If you marry a woman who is 1) much younger 2) a foreigner 3) with no degree or career of her own, the court will find you abused a position of power, or something to that effect. What it boils down to in practice is that the sexual trade-union of ageing femihags is deterring men from marrying a young hottie from a developing country. You are the owned slave of the women's studies graduates. You are not allowed to shop around the world for alternative …
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:37 AM
1

Zillions of people used marijuana when it got prohibited. Zillions of people rounded up and jailed since then. No blood in the street.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:51 AM
1

They will love it. The less men w*nk to porn, the more customers they have. I assume sex worker means prostitute, not X-rated actress. But even the latter will not protest much. They have other options. A female body with a good figure will sell, in one form or another.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:48 AM
1

Well, the UK has been quite stubborn in its restrictions on hard-core porn over the past decades if I'm not mistaken, so retiring into fortress UK may not be a good idea. Can you buy an uncensored hard-core porn film or mag in a sex-shop in the UK these days? Not that you would want to given the internet, but it shows where the UK stands.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:13 PM
1

Juries are limited as to their choice of words in their verdict. All the same, not guilty = innocent, like in "innocent till proven guilty".
/r/MensRights11/03/13 01:33 PM
2

How could ages-of-consent and the resulting abuse industry not be a MR issue?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:59 PM
6

Because it is men who look down the age pyramid, not women. As such, because they go for younger partners (and not for older ones like women), men will overwhelmingly make up the majority of potential "criminals". And MRAs (men's rights activists) should seek to reduce the potential for male criminalisation.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:49 PM
6

This is why ages of consent ARE a major MRA issue. And MRAs should set their feelings of rivalry and jealousy aside and fight to 1) have AOCs lowered across the board 2) have AOCs standardised for the sake of legal certainty: sex, pics, anal, oral, porn, male-female, 75 y.o. with just legal, just legal with other just legal etc.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:46 PM
2

I seems parents of pupils are opposed to his return. Damned parents! They deserve to have schools with all-female staff and a shortage of maths and science teachers.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 08:22 AM
0

Indeed women often don't understand female sexuality either. Only heterosexual women understand male AND female sexuality to a certain extent. Angry Harry wrote an great article on this but I haven't been able to track it down again. This lack of understanding by women makes it all the more unacceptable for them to legislate unilaterally about male sexuality.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:00 PM
143

Interesting passage: "But one judge who disagreed warned that this decision would have dangerous repercussions on women who secretly stop taking the pill to get pregnant." So the dear judge was worried about possible repercussions on women, not about the plight of the man he was sentencing. All the same, I hope there WILL be repercussions on women (but I doubt there will be).
/r/MensRights08/03/13 10:10 AM
1

Note how the BBC uses the same stereotyped pic as in a recent similar article about Russia: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21474931 This kind of reporting is sheer informational pornography. Note also that the OP article is written by "Caroline Anstey Managing director, World Bank". Guess where the World Bank's money is going.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:58 AM
3

"Gender as a social construct" is cultural marxism, but I'm not sure it's a core feminist tenet. Evolutionary biology is opposed to the idea of anything biological being dismissed as a "social construct", remember. Now EP and feminism are not exactly at logger-heads. Women don't give jack-shit about nature vs nurture as long as they get the long end of the stick.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 01:33 PM
2

What should be borne in mind is that women get praised for being abstinent while men get ridiculed for it. Now tell me what is easier about sex? Having much of it or the reverse?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:18 PM
1

All this wouldn't happen if prostitution were legal for men and women (and their customers). Make more things illegal -----> more extortion and blackmail.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:00 PM
2

I've always found twitter to be messy and confused. Like telecommunication with a lot of static.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 02:56 PM
1

What a lie. Critical comments are accepted though. Let's go!
/r/MensRights06/03/13 09:36 AM
9

You view is typical of a woman and a feminist.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 09:12 AM
8

See how they say "her personal space". How wide is such a space? I've said it before: the endpoint of all this is strict m/f segregation throughout Society.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:54 AM
2

That's it, joint custody. And we know joint custody often means the fathers gets to see his child one in a blue moon.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:30 AM
5

One reason women are not happy with men catching up is that women want to go on cashing in the deceased husband's pension without having the old fart around.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:37 PM
0

Oh no! Oh no! Don't stop ... I'm cumming ... no! OMG! ------> 3 times no = 3 counts of rape. 30 years behind bars!
/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:34 PM
0

By the definition of rape most MRAs would - alas - be comfortable with, you would commit rape if you don't stop and leave immediately.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 12:28 PM
-1

Does this idea of getting "raped" give you guys a hard-on? This obsession with being a victim of unwanted female sexual attention is suspicious. Loads of women get wet when they go on about being raped but I guess many men do as well. It also flatters a man's ego no end ("look here I was raped by a girl, am I not irresistible? not like the other guys who need to pay to get laid hey?). Let's stop w*nking and let's get down to the job at hand (killing the Medusa).
/r/MensRights05/03/13 12:17 PM
1

Anyone asking "was I raped?" CAN'T have been raped. Just like anyone asking "did I shit in my pants right now?" didn't do so.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 06:49 AM
9

Former French president Chirac is also reported to suffer at the hands of his wife Bernadette. Here's the story (in French but you can discern the words "violent" and "odious" in the title): http://www.linternaute.com/actualite/personnalites/jacques-chirac-la-revanche-odieuse-et-violente-de-bernadette-1212.shtml Patriarchy my foot!
/r/MensRights04/03/13 03:18 PM
6

And if you click the link provided in the first sentence you get the Guardian article. Hint: you do not need to read the article, just look at the pic. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/04/police-behaviour-sex-attacks-women-change Elementary my dear Goebbels!
/r/MensRights04/03/13 01:36 PM
3

I remember a French hooker complaining: "when they're not trying to arrest us, they calling us slaves". Legalisation of prostitution should be high on the MM agenda, not least because fundamental liberties are at stake. If some of you guys (and guyesses) know how tu use twitter, you could do worse than take part in such discussions and tell them we're fighting, if not the same fight, at least the same enemy.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 01:27 PM
2

Countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia will be handy bogeymen for the Feminist propaganda machine. Some years ago Saudi Arabia responded to criticism it treated its women horribly after a woman there had been executed. The Saudis answered it simply wasn't true since only one in 50 people beheaded in the Kingdom were women. The Saudis were not even being cynical: the 49 men executed were of little interest to the Western media. Not only were they drug dealers and rapists, they were male. If you…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 01:11 PM
1

Women on average are better off than men in all countries. Men are the disposable sex in all countries. When a woman is in bad shape, you can bet her husband is already dead. In all countries. At all times in History.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 08:06 AM
1

This is not necessarily good news. It could mean Abbott is enough of a feminist to be liked by female voters. In a place where everyone is a feminist, accusations of misogyny will backfire for sure.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:56 AM
-1

90% of the cases thrown around in this reddit are statutory rapes. They're cases where all hypocrites (including those in this reddit) think: "lucky bastard, if only that could've happened to me". Men should do well to concentrate on paternity fraud. Being cuckolded for life is much worse than getting a blowjob from a sexy teacher when you're a teenager.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:59 PM
2

This posting shouldn't be down-voted because the stats are lying. Quite the reverse: it is interesting and challenging to see how devious official sources can be. The NYT has been knows as a hotbed of feminism.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:47 PM
1

Can we trust the figure? My feeling is: too good to be true, there's a catch somewhere.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 09:03 AM
3

On the same day, the BBC has "The silent nightmare of domestic violence in Russia" (all perpetuated by men of course) : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21474931 And this shit (financed by taxpayer's licences) describes itself in Wikipedia having as "main responsibility is to provide impartial public service broadcasting in the United Kingdom"!
/r/MensRights01/03/13 08:56 AM
2

Note that it says "Some, if not all of the girls, were minors." It says nothing about the boys. Apparently in their case being minors doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:40 AM
3

So will that judge lose her job or position?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:37 AM
8

Good! MRAs should focus on issues like paternity fraud instead of going crazy about female teachers robbing randy teens of their virginity. Paternity fraud is a typical female crime.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:33 AM
1

Most lesbians I know are actually on the MRM's side. Andrea Dworkin, Beatrix Campbell, Julie Bindel ..... If there's ever a Nuremberg trial for crimes against male humanity, the dock will be full of Lesbians. Here's an interesting take on why the most infamous man-haters tend to be lesbians: http://www.angryharry.com/esEnvyJealousy.htm?note
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:23 PM
0

Why logical? Because men seek younger partners and males between 16 and 18 will have no legal younger partners available? Note: they could fall back on their "rapist" female teachers but most MRAs want the latter jailed.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:39 PM
2

Poor 17 year-old man (baby?)! He got sex from a looker. To jail with her! Equal injustice for all, men and women! I agree he could've been traumatized for life though, in the sense that this may have been the best-looking girl he's ever going to have in all his life. Still, the judge is as stupid as many MRAs in vowing incarceration for a man committing the same "crime".
/r/MensRights28/02/13 10:16 AM
-2

The video says Loni Bouchard was babysitting a "teen boy". That baby was 14 years old. Maybe she fondled him while she gave him the bottle? When I was 14 my parents thought I was too old to be baby-sat, alas! Gosh how I would've loved to have had such a baby-sitter, a real looker, here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/05/loni-bouchard_n_919369.html Poor bloke, it must've been hard on him to be abused by such a gorgeous girl.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:19 AM
3

Let me elaborate. Gays are the obligate allies of Lesbians. Lesbians are the SS (the Gestapo) within the feminazis. Gays are not only protected, they have a direct line to the Centre of Power (to Hitler's bunker). This is why when a gay male is under attack, he will immediately pull the gay card on his attackers, not the MRA card which - comparatively speaking - is a dud. As long as gay males can protect themselves in this way, they have no incentive to join the MM.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:12 PM
3

Gays are a privileged minority, just like women. Belonging to that minority affords a measure of protection. Especially if you're already "officially" registered as gay.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:42 PM
4

That girl got a kick when she was pseudo-raped. And she got a 2nd kick from telling it to the newspaper. That's OK except when men have to go to jail because of it.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:24 AM
2

It could have been written by feminists. But it was written by people who have an axe to grind with Islam. It confuses the issue for the fems: if they go on publishing fake stats, will this be interpreted as racism?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:08 AM
1

No. Yes.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:13 PM
39

Look at the tone of this Telegraph article on the same story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9894588/Compulsive-liar-jailed-after-11-false-rape-claims-in-decade.html It seems the established press is finally waking up. Her lawyer said: "Jones immediately accepted she had lied when approached by the police and pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity". I add: the likes of her should be hanged at the earliest opportunity.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:36 PM
1

A major work of fiction whose plot revolves around a false rape accusation is the novel " A Passage to India" by E.M. Foster (and the film based on it).
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:31 PM
0

Men go on paying for sex they no longer get (if they ever got it, that is). So the alimony whore is not required to trade sex for money any more. She has her own personal slave slaving for her. Hordes of women can thus stay out of the sex market. This keeps he price of pussy artificially high.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:14 AM
11

10 years of probation? When I'm 90, if I kill someone, I'd also like to get 10 years probation.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:06 AM
1

That's why many men love series like Star Trek and other non-science fiction but older series: they're not full of PC bullshit. Chivalry is present though (captain Kirk putting himself at risk to protect THE woman). All male heroes in all series and movies are chivalrous.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:52 AM
0

Typical rubbish! Feminism is all over the social "sciences" and the humanities. How long before the sciences succumb? Life sciences are already substantially contaminated.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:30 AM
2

Which paywall?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:09 PM
2

Guilty plea of “conducting performance harmful to minors". Why were such performances never conducted on me when I was 17? Life is so unfair!
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:05 PM
1

I'm glad you recognize implicitly that sex should only be had only for money, preferably for much money. Many men and women are not that honest about it. We agree on that point. I don't think men should be exploited though. As to immigrants, they're fed up with being "protected" by being arrested, interrogated, taken in custody, forced to give false testimonies, and expelled from the country. Some protection indeed!
/r/MensRights22/02/13 10:01 AM
-4

She should get stoned for giving away sex for free! We MRAs don't want sex with women. We only want sex with our left hand. Or we're jealous of the young guys who get lucky? Whatever.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 08:39 AM
3

Typical lesbian rant. Lesbians think they can "convince" women to become lesbians. It doesn't work that way though.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 08:31 AM
1

True, but they're very protectionistic in the type of legalisation they advocate. For example they will insist no prostitute should be under 21 (even if the AOC is 18) and they will try to keep foreign girls from becoming sex workers. All in all, it's the old feminist Sexual Trade Union at work. And as a man you end up paying twice as much as you would for the same service in a free market. More generally, prostitution should be kept artificially expensive for the marriage whore to retain her ir…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 08:17 AM
1

Fact is, many prostitutes choose to stay illegal because if they go legal they get clobbered by the tax-man and by rents. A legal prostitute in Germany has to pay 150-170 euros a day for renting a 30 squared meter room! Multiply that by 30 and you get a rent that is 5 times the "normal" squared-meter rent. Apparently the landlords are not necessarily to blame because they themselves complain of being over-proportionately taxed by local authorities. And on what the girl "keeps" after rent she sti…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 08:06 AM
3

Most of the authors are Germans. That's odd because Germany has always been adamant its system of legalized prostitution was trafficking-free. Anyway there's no reason for legalized office work or legalized scientific research not to encourage human trafficking as well.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 03:48 PM
2

The myth of forced prostitution is part of the abuse industry. The abuse industry doesn't want prostitution to be consensual or regarded as such. In fact it is remarkable prostitution should retain such a degree of consensuality despite its being illegal. You don't need coercion to convince a voluptuous woman a 10 thousand dollar job as a sex-worker is better than a 1 thousand dollar job as a shop-assistant.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 02:37 PM
1

The same point is made by Angry Harry: http://angryharry.com/Should-Defendants-Be-Granted-Anonymity.htm
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:12 AM
1

Typical of the BBC (British Bullshitting Corporation), see: http://www.angryharry.com/esSomeBBCPropagandaTricks.htm P.S. The BBC is financed by taxpayers' money (television licence, costing £145.50 per year per household).
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:49 AM
1

Yeah, because she committed the only crime for which women think women should go to jail, ie giving away sex for free. Don't you get it guys? Sex is something women should get something in return for. Giving it away is a crime. It drives prices down. That's what you're contributing to enforce by demanding prison for statutory rape. Go on churning!
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:24 PM
3

Those links could be submitted to this reddit (although some members would contrive to say they have nothing to do with men's rights). We shouldn't be surprised for mothers to be able to kill their own children. After all abortion - whatever one's political stance on it - is the nearest a mother can get to murdering her own children without actually murdering them. Western women preach from atop a mountain of aborted lives.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 12:28 PM
0

You don't argue with feminists, period. Feminists know what side their bread is buttered on, and so should you. Fidelbogen has an article about this, quote: "So, don't argue with feminists. Just TELL them things! ... I simply tell them things. I prefer to agitate and mobilize against them - we are past the stage of discussion. They will need to NEGOTIATE. Engaging them in dialogue is like inserting a suction hose into your very own psychic energy pool - this will only drain you, and fatten them!…
/r/MensRights20/02/13 09:42 AM
6

Hey guys, look how the BBC (British Bullshit Corporation) manages not to point the finger at the mother: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21503299
/r/MensRights20/02/13 08:51 AM
-6

Gosh, where were such women when I was 15? I now realise I missed out on a lot in my life.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 07:13 AM
2

Maybe to teach members a lesson about pity votes.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 08:17 AM
-1

Only for men the list reduces to 3 items: money, knowledge and resources. That's why women hold sway over men, all other things equal.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:44 AM
0

The only think I don't like in the article is the emphasis on "white". How white is white? Are South American models revered because they're half-white or because they're half-black? Lookism is the issue, not racism.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:41 AM
1

Because it's a hoax.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:38 AM
2

Many sensible postings get scuppered and this hoax gets voted sky-high. IMO self-posts should no be allowed. They degrade the whole thing into a usenet forum.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:38 AM
2

"This is my body. I have the right to dress sluttishly, then to cry rape or harassment. But I deny the right of other women to do sex work. That's Prooooostitution! Not their body at all."
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:16 AM
2

A contrarian view is that the more innocent (often rich & famous) men are dragged into the news and eventually proven innocent, the better for the fight against feminism. False accusations are self-limiting. This is a purely tactical consideration. Note also that something doesn't become fair just because it goes on behind closed doors. False accusations could increase dramatically and due process could be denied all the same. A silent goulag. The more mess feminism creates, the sooner the absce…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:18 PM
1

But then the /r/politics posters would say "this has nothing to do with politics. Move it to /r/mensrights!" Aren't all reddits circle jerks? Alas points cannot be awarded on the basis of how many MRA leaflets/posters/stickers people distribute in real life. Whenever I visit a public toilet these days, shit is not the only think I leave behind: http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/rapists.pdf
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:28 PM
0

The site says: "Gay and bisexual men unfortunately remain the targets of hate crime". No progress here. Homosexuals ride the wave of victimhood, although they're very well protected by now. Gay men do not stand up for men's rights on the whole. They see themselves as the natural allies of Lesbians for example. The most virulent man-haters have been Lesbians. On this topic of gays vs. MRM, here's an interesting MRA youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn3KRmGu-X0
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:37 AM
9

Obama is a no-BS kind of guy and I don't think he would continue to say things like that if he knew the facts. He's just misinformed I don't buy that. He knows very well what's going on. They all (the politicians) know by now.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:31 AM
0

Yeah, that's the main point, sadly.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:39 AM
2

I think I remember they first banned DNA tests to prevent the unmasking of African immigration tricksters who declared children as their own although they weren't. DNA tests were labelled "racist". Of course feminists wanted a ban too. "Anti-racism" and feminism worked hand in hand. Note that a test is still possible with a court order. It would be interesting to know how readily cuckolded men can obtain a court order. How bad cuckolded men fare in France depends not on the legality of home-kits…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:02 AM
1

Pussy pass all-right. However paedophile? Nay, not with a human being aged 16, who for all I know may have had more body hair and a bigger cock than most of us on this forum.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:27 AM
2

You're right of course, but I only wish MRAs would campaign for the SAME TOLERANCE FOR MEN, rather than demand the same repression for all.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:22 AM
-3

Where the hell were those women when I was 16?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:09 PM
-6

Lateral thinking is not your forte, so let me give you some clues. Could it be gender-discrimation is so pervasive it cuts across species boundaries? Could it be that the way a Society views maleness vs. femaleness bears (no pun intended) some relationship with men's rights? Could apparently harmless but very popular media productions like wildlife documentaries be a major conduit for anti-male stereotype?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:36 AM
2

Legalizing misandry :http://www.amazon.com/Legalizing-Misandry-Systemic-Discrimination-Against/dp/0773528628/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1360571731&sr=8-1&keywords=legalizing+misandry Plus, of course Warren Farrell's books (eg The Myth of Male Power)
/r/MensRights11/02/13 08:36 AM
-4

The article says: "the bear won’t be killed as she was only trying to protect her cubs." Rings a bell doesn't it? The male bear that didn't kill anyone wasn't so lucky: http://www.suntimes.com/news/nation/6847437-418/yellowstone-park-officials-kill-grizzly-bear-that-charged-man.html Excerpt: ""Nobody was hurt Saturday when the male grizzly aggressively approached a man..... Park officials said they trapped and euthanized the male bear Monday ..."
/r/MensRights11/02/13 08:15 AM
14

For completeness, here's the link (in French) where it says the accuser was ordered to repay the 60 000 EUR she got from a victims fund, but will probably not repay : http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2012/09/27/01016-20120927ARTFIG00538-loic-secher-ne-fera-appel.php One phrase from this article: "Mais compte tenu de la fragilité psychologique de la jeune femme ..." ("But owing to the young woman's psychological frailness ...") No need to say more.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:09 PM
0

Couldn't you sneak in after working hours and replace that "majority of survivors are female" by "... are male" ?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:32 PM
1

I wouldn't want to be a male student at the University of Toronto. I fear feminism will do anything (including calling in the police and the army against men) rather than concede an inch. We ain't seen nothing yet.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:10 AM
2

Norton products were shitty products anyway, difficult or near impossible to erase from your drive once they'd taken hold. When I bought my new laptop Norton was one of the first I got rid of.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:44 AM
1

Yeah, for example a link will be downvoted because the linked source doesn't denounce a gender-bias. This is dumb because no article taken from the established media will ever as much as acknowledge its gender bias. This doesn't mean we should ignore the established media and only link to MRA friendly sources. Quite the reverse. We should expose the hypocrisy and manipulative nature of the established media.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 09:34 AM
1

And if you click the facebook page of the "violence is male" campaign, you find a link that says: "Eight Senators voted today to block the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, which would protect victims of domestic violence." The link is to a disgustingly misandric webpage: http://nametheproblem.com/#comment-369
/r/MensRights05/02/13 09:07 AM
1

Too little research is done into andropause treatment, and male hormonal treatment is very hard to get in many countries. Women can get hormonal treatment on demand, well ahead of reaching menopause, but older men who feel crappy are just told to get plenty of exercice and mind their diet. In Germany DHEA (dehydroepiandrosterone) is officially unavailable as an oral medecine. But it has been made into an official injection drug called "Gynodian". Yes folks, a "Gyno" drug, ie a drug for females. …
/r/MensRights05/02/13 08:03 AM
1

I can't compare to other Reddits but it seems what you say almost never happens does happen often enough. It happens e.g. in the form of what I call "secondary white-knighting". By that I mean MRAs who default back to chivalry whenever female "MRAs" are involved in a discussion.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:26 AM
1

Yes, usually in Indonesia you get sentenced to death for a fraction of the amount she was carrying. N.B. I do not support the ban on drugs and I think no one should do time for selling, carrying or consuming any drug.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:42 PM
5

Note that donations to AVfM were acknowledged by an e-mail saying "your donation to the American Human Rights Association" or something very similar. This name change can be construed as a harmonisation move. That's the most optimistic theory I can think of. As for me I like MRA. It has a bite into it. It sounds like "men's republican army". Besides, I vaguely remember reading three-letter acronyms had a bigger impact than four-letter ones.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:59 PM
2

Then you would degrade this Reddit to being an Reddit campaigning against the death penalty. And this should not be a debate about the death penalty. MRAs are entitled to their own view regarding the death penalty for blood-spilling crimes (feminists for their part would prefer the death penalty to be reserved for rapists and (male) paedophiles).
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:46 PM
4

So each time a black woman gets the pussy pass there will be no gender issue? Because, of course, had it been a black man who got sentenced by a black jury, he would've have been spared? Did it occur to anyone that the jury could've been set up precisely so that this woman would escape the death penalty for her heinous crime. I bet many a white serial killer would be happy to get a jury consisting of 11 black and 1 white. A quote from another article will put things into perspective: "McCarthy w…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:39 PM
1

That's a good one!
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:08 AM
5

I don't much like name changes. What's wrong with MRM or MRA? It's about men's rights, not women's rights. Why dilute? Why fidget and go on the defensive?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:01 AM
1

Well-spotted, apparently they don't teach arithmetic in women's studies.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 12:37 PM
1

"They" has been standard English for some time now whenever applicable. Besides, the site says (see my post below): "Most (about 95%) are male"
/r/MensRights30/01/13 07:00 AM
0

Maybe we should picket the AMA to the tune of "no hate speech"?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:22 PM
2

On the same page, click "MENU" -----> "ABOUT THE PERPETRATORS", there it is: "Most (about 95%) are male"
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:15 PM
1

I wonder whether this also happens with middle-eastern Airlines. I wouldn't be surprised to learn the likes of Qatar Airways or Emirates hadn't the same policy. Do Western Airlines deserve that we boycott them? They're not offering such good value for money as it is compared to the above-mentioned airlines.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:33 AM
5

If someone has more info on the identity of the man involved (or an article specifying his identity). I have the high frequent flyer status on that company and I wouldn't mind mailing them with my concern over this incident.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:43 PM
1

Much as I disagree with much of AVfM, I think giving the fems a taste of their own medicine is necessary. Women are always shielded from danger (chivalry, remember). Facing the consequences of their hate speech is new to them.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:35 PM
4

You're right, it was not about male staffers. It was about male victims of DV. We already have a lie here. It doesn't bode well for the rest of the venture.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:43 AM
3

I wonder how much "men's issues" will be allowed into the film, if at all. Some authors have had their novel or life story stolen from them from movie people.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:42 AM
-2

I don't even believe in the "pains of childbirth". Overall pregnancy is a feel-good experience (endorphines). Otherwise women wouldn't want to have anything to do with it. So maybe we should give boys a 9-month heroine course so that they feel what having a child is like. Women are such frauds all along the line!
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:30 AM
1

I'm much worse. And yes, why not, I'm a misogynist. Of course you two are feminists, but I hope men on Reddit and elsewhere reject the truce women are bound to offer once they see the tables being turned on them. There are plenty of sites on the web supporting women. In fact 80% of the internet. A site such as this one and other MRA sites should not support women. An MRA site should say "this is a men's site, no time to waste on supporting wales, political parties or women". Men's site = for men…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:15 PM
-3

Except it says "allowed", not "required". Like everything for women. They have the option, not the obligation. They can work if they want, or stay at home if they want. You bet that if there's a war women will register in droves for a combat post! They will opt out, skive, put themselves out of harm's way, like they've always done.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:22 PM
-1

No. MRM has no business supporting women. Let them fend for themselves. In fact they're doing a good job at fending for themselves. They have all the privileges.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:17 PM
1

Feminism is the enemy. Being an anti-feminist is sine qua non to being a MRA.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:15 PM
1

Yes, but please remember "the myth of sex-trafficking". E.g. here: http://theantifeminist.com/the-myth-of-sex-trafficking/
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:45 AM
1

The protesters against the strip club were, I suppose, mostly female. This tallies with the sexual trade-union theory of feminism. Women are out to eliminate what they see as unfair competition to their ageing or second-rate pussies. Never mind the sexual revolution and the freedoms that are supposed to go hand in hand with it. Any woman would be happy to be a beautiful object. And any plain or average woman who protests against objectification is only envious. She would give anything to be an o…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:36 AM
1

Exactly. Prostitution (or stripping etc.) is the exploitation by women of men's desire for multiple partners. A man forks out a week's wages for a quick erotic thrill with a hooker/stripper and we are made to believe that the one being exploited is the woman pocketing the money.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:35 AM
4

Note that according to the article the the Rio chief of police is a woman. It must be frustrating to be a policeman in Rio, risking you life for years, attacking gangsters nests with your bullet-proof vest on and an assault rifle to replace your pistol, and then find yourself with a boss who probably never exchanged fire in her "career".
/r/MensRights23/01/13 03:25 PM
2

I'm one of those serious people. Where were such women when I was a randy, frustrated teenager? Could've done with a bit of attention from a woman, thanks very much. Then again, I was probably abnormal. I'm sure most of my fellow teenage men preferred randiness and frustration to sex with a woman any time :)
/r/MensRights21/01/13 01:47 PM
2

We should argue for men to have the same exemption from prosecution, not for women to be prosecuted as well.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 01:45 PM
1

Legal requirement eg in Germany. Surprise, surprise, she can get an abortion without her husband's signature.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:49 PM
1

"The man is a world famous rock star. The women are not." How do you know the women are not famous rock stars? See the problem?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:01 PM
2

Such statements make me suspect women might enjoy slut shaming. In the sense that it puts them in victim position and that's where women like to be. Anything that portrays women as victims (of slut shaming, of violence etc.) is welcomed by women. Even long after the victimisation has vanished, they will still insist on it being a problem. Women are victimization whores.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:52 AM
1

Simple, the woman would not be named. It would be reported that two men named X and Y are being charged with child sex offences while a third person (name withheld) is "still being questioned by police".
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:49 AM
1

Note also the caption under the picture: "Ian Watkins is one of three people charged following an investigation". When women commit crimes, they become "people". The phrasing of the caption is engineered to hide the fact that this criminal trio is 2/3rds female. We're lucky that the story contains at least one (short) sentence pointing that two (unidentified!) women are under investigation. How many such stories would not even mention the women? Also, the character of this rock star is ruined ev…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:11 AM
6

Notice how she's hailed as planning to study medicine to become a surgeon. Funny how all those promising teenage female geniuses always "plan" to embrace ambitious male-dominated careers. I bet this one will stay in the swimwear business.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:50 AM
1

I knew. But I doubt women are not put in combat positions. The dying is still done by men. I haven't checked by I'm confident that's the case. The fact that women make up half of the officers is absolutely scandalous under the circumstances. Not only are men required to die but they get sent to their deaths by women who aren't.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:15 AM
1

And this is against the backdrop of Israeli men being required to fight and die for their "motherland" at a moment's notice! Israeli men should stop defending their borders. Let the Arabs in, the Israeli feminist whores will know how to deal with them (will they?).
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:53 PM
5

The sentences remain puny compared to the harm done to the man. Also, women prisons are 3-star hotels, and we don't know whether the sentences are served in full, or at all. The articles on the web don't say whether the sentence was a suspended one or not.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:18 AM
2

Surely you know what I mean. By feminist standards women never mature. They cannot make their own decisions regarding eg sexual consent. They can cry rape at any time after a sexual encounter. A glass of beer is enough to dispossess them of any capacity to consent. They have no legal responsibility, criminal or civil.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:41 AM
1

Maybe because puberty (and thereby maturity) occurs well ahead of the AOC? Puberty doesn't happen at midnight on the 18th birthday, not in humans at leasts, in fact I wouldn't be surprised if it happened years before that, monthly bleeding and all that stuff. Of course we know women NEVER mature mentally. They're not accountable for anything they decide to do. Someone - some men - force them to do it. They're Society's endless spoiled children. Ever in need of gifts and protection and provision …
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:38 AM
1

Now look who's talking!
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:34 AM
1

When I read those I'm wondering whether women don't actually wish to be raped. I know it sounds crazy, but you never know with women, always saying the opposite of what they're thinking. All those calls on men "not to rape them here, not to rape them there". And doing so in an environment where the concentration of real rapists is virtually nil. Could be a shit test of sorts. A challenge for "real men" to show they're real men by raping them and getting away with it. Replace with "show your meta…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:41 PM
1

It is kinda slowed down right now but the link is the good one.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:39 PM
3

AOC laws will always represent a discrimination against men because it is men, not women, who are hardwired to seek younger partners. Jailing a handful of token female teachers who get too friendly with their under-age students cannot remedy this bias. To re-establish jailing parity, one would need to re-criminalize exclusively female crimes like abortion or paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:34 PM
-1

Note that in 2005 Bill Maher went on to date Karrine Steffans who, according to Wikipedia, "in April 2006, appeared on The Oprah Winfrey Show [...]. Steffans discussed how she had suffered sexual abuse as a child, and how she allowed herself to be sexually exploited in order to obtain work in music videos." Steffans doesn't seem to have tried extorting Bill Maher though. She may have thought she'd fail in the attempt, just like the former girlfriend. I suspect someone like Bill Maher does more f…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 12:52 PM
1

Can you sign the petition if you're not a US citizen?
/r/MensRights28/11/12 08:06 AM
1

I would like to see his false accuser spend her first Thanksgiving in jail.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:46 PM
1

Masculism (masculinism?). I don't like the sound of the word. It sounds contrived. It conjures up ideas of men doing macho things like body-building on steroids. Sounds like an attempt to water down the MRM too.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:11 AM
12

Public prosecutors in Bavaria are women 90% of the time. They are proud of being "as hard as nails", thereby proving women aren't the weak sex. They aren't all right, especially when it comes to getting the man in jail and the woman off the hook. Don't think Germany (or at least this very special part of Germany) is a rule-of-law paradise. The Bavarian prison system is notorious for "soft torturing" drug prisoners. What they do is they put the convict on the list of convicts with suicidal tenden…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:33 PM
0

MRAs should no count on women and should not give women MRAs the red carpet treatment. Rather, MRAs should be suspicious of women. Women's success in hijacking and coopting every single ideology or movement to date should be born in mind.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 07:49 AM
1

So you would say as a vasectomized man in Germany I can fuck around and run next to no risk of being trapped into an unwanted pregnancy? Until now I've assumed I was at risk. I know of a man who was not vasectomized and was trapped by a Brazilian girl. He fought until the end but he turned out to be the father. A sum of 60 thousand euro was named for the whole DNA testing and taking of evidence. This was 10 years ago, DNA techniques are cheaper now. Anyway there's no denying that Europe is not a…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 08:59 AM
1

A man on AVfM told me the US had 300000 fathers denied access to their children. Among those 30000 were in jail for delinquency and 50000 had committed suicide. We're not there yet in Europe. I would say in most EU countries if you are a small-earner you don't risk much by marrying. Of course women will not want to marry you except foreign women who need a stay permit (but even then consulates may refuse to grant a visa on the grounds that you don't earn enough). My advice to small-earners in Eu…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 08:53 AM
1

What about the earlier wife if she's never worked in her life? I would've thought she would still be entitled to something as long as she doesn't have a job, which can be a long time in the present economic context. What about compensation for pension contribution she never paid ("Versorgungsausgleich")? This can represent a shitload of money (I know because I had to pay it). Also, in your descending order (1 children, 2 new wife, 3 earlier wives), if a man has no children and doesn't remarry, t…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 07:58 AM
1

Family law is certainly less noxious in Germany (or France, etc.) for men than it is in the US (or the UK, etc.). But if you are not poor you'd better not marry a poor girl (unless she has a good job, but she will get herself sacked before she sues for divorce). Germany and France would feel like paradise for the US imprisoned alimony delinquent, but this is not saying much.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:47 PM
1

For crime against "women and children", it seems. Ever heard of false rape allegations and false abuse allegations? In Islam too men are the disposable sex. Your reaction is to look at the mugs of those Afghans and think "good riddance of bad rubbish, those guys are reported to be criminals and they look like criminals, let'm hang!". A typical male-on-male reaction. If they were 15 y.o. girls caught prostituting (a crime worthy of the death penalty under Afghan law, for sure), the whole world wo…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 10:18 AM
0

Don't bet too much on Islam being kinder to men. Today the BBC has an article about 6 men hanged in Afgahnistan, for "crimes against the people, especially women and children": http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20425514 Females have always been protected at the detriment of men, everywhere. Now if the MRM succeeds that might change, for the first time in History.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:15 AM
1

I see it as another paedohysteria article. Adding boys to the overinflated abuse figures will do no good. It will only multiply overinflated figures by two. If paedohysteria is allowed to go on (with the help of some section of the MRM, alas), there will come a time where everyone around claims to have been abused. Everyone will then be able to sue everyone else for damages.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:00 AM
0

Because the woman refuses access to the child. Do you think that the police will kick in the woman's door, grab the child and bring it to the doctor for a sample to be taken? Not even in Germany (auch nicht in Bayern :)
/r/MensRights22/11/12 07:49 AM
1

I needed my wife's signature to get my vasectomy 20 years ago in Europe. Of course, had my wife got pregnant and wanted to have an abortion, my signature wouldn't have been needed. Note that vasectomies are considered "reversible" by the courts so that a vasectomized man can still be presumed to be the father of a child that isn't his. Medically speaking spontaneous reversions are extremely rare, slightly superior to growing new breasts after breast removal surgery. Even after reversal surgery, …
/r/MensRights22/11/12 07:43 AM
3

Beware that vasectomy doesn't protect you from having to pay alimony for a child that isn't yours. If a woman says you're the father, it can take years before a DNA test is possible. In the meantime you pay and the law gets further changed behind your back so that even if the test turns out negative you go on paying. Remember: no science can save you if the legal system is a cesspool. P.S. I had a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:21 PM
1

This yahoo article doesn't allow comments. The very title is offensive in the sense that asking the question and answering it are the one and same thing: NO! Fancy a man writing an article entitled: "should a woman have to give a blow-job to a man in the street who is a perfect stranger to her?"
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:16 PM
1

I'd have thought there could be no such thing as a lengthy suspended jail sentence. Normally only part of the sentence (eg 2 thirds) is suspended, the remaining third is to be served. They seemed to have invented the notion just for women. P.S. I'm personally not in favour of anyone (male or female) going to jail for giving sex to sexually developed and consenting human being.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 08:14 AM
4

Yeah. Think about this: a couple is arrested doing drugs. Who gets charged and prosecuted? The man of course. The woman becomes a crown witness (she testifies against the guy and is let off the hook). The man is prosecuted for dealing because he's the one who will be convicted for having procured the drugs and giving it to the woman who is, as ever, the "victim". Happens all the time, never mind what really happened and that women are often the worst drug fiends.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:55 AM
1

This is because young males ("boys") are still largely protected from the nastier sides of feminism. That's why I don't much like the emphasis on "bois". Boys may be treated less well than girls, but on the whole the victims of feminism are middle-age men. Boys are underage, remember, so as underaged they enjoy one degree of victimhood. Girls have double victimhood because they are 1) underage and 2) female (if they're black they have triple victimhood for belonging to a racial minority is a vic…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:50 AM
1

Look at this question in Yahoo Answers: http://nz.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110406190728AAvoEb7 Let's go there and flag it to death!
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:46 AM
0

So we should troll Yahoo Answers and massively flag pro-feminist queries so they they too get removed.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:43 AM
4

That's the common wisdom, but Wikepedia has an interesting article on "Female sexual sex-tourism". Women, remember, will lie about anything and manage to have public opinion believe anything if it suits their aims. Especially about sexuality, any pronouncement by women is to be taken as untruthfull.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:08 PM
1

If the girl is clever she will no mind because these days prenups are not worth the paper they're written on. They can at most decide who gets the cat after divorce.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 01:05 PM
1

While I agree shaming tactics will only gets us so far, remember access by males to female physical beauty is the driving force of human interactions. It's what life for us men is about. By the same token, the unequal distribution of such beauty at birth, and its decline over time (ageing), are obsessional in women. Any good-looking woman is a thorn in the eyes of all less good-looking women. Hampering better-looking women and preventing men from concentrating their resources on them accounts fo…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:09 AM
1

You have to see this in the context of the sexual trade-union theory. I'd never blame a woman for being ugly but I reserve the right to call her bluff for example if she pretends to combat prostitution for humanitarian reasons while all the time she's been doing it because she's livid about better-looking women cashing in on their own looks. Lack of looks is not a sin but it gives no one the right to prevent other people from getting the best out of life.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 06:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter