TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jackass93269 Archive

View 4 posts and 25 comments by jackass93269 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

So no vote for women?
/r/MensRights30/01/24 09:59 PM
1

While I agree that censorship is very bad, please don't align the men's rights movement with Jordan Peterson. He is actually an actual misogynist unlike most of us and he is barely speaking coherently these days.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:18 PM
3

Exactly, OP is just painting a partial picture where in fact he could be the real villain. I'm going to assume that unless he clarifies.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:40 AM
5

I'm sure OP has a domestic violence charge. These are the assholes who exploit men's rights forums to garner sympathy.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:04 AM
1

Where's your source for your title?
/r/MensRights22/12/20 03:41 AM
2

Nope. That's not the girl with the gender studies minor.l
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:37 AM
2

Let's totally ignore context and play "what does the dictionary say". Fun game.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 11:55 AM
2

Differences in preferences by gender is not the same as gender roles. One is enforced and the other is chosen. These papers and methodologies are rather simplistic point in time studies
/r/MensRights19/10/20 11:21 AM
8

That's the most retarded shit I've heard
/r/MensRights19/10/20 10:43 AM
-1

Exactly the point I wanted to make. This sub has a tendency to view the entire world as the same as Europe/north America. Women's rights is a joke in a lot of countries and nowhere close to the unjust nature society discriminates against men in the west. Promoting men's right does not equal supporting repressing women's rights.
/r/MensRights05/09/20 05:17 PM
2

There's nothing "this true" about this. Each and every sentence is subjective at best and very debatable. But that's besides the point. This sub is for discussing men's rights and alleviating gender based inequality, no matter what your political leaning is.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 02:40 PM
33

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights01/09/20 01:58 PM
4

This is televised crap. Their entire "Frank discussion" is a show. Don't fall for this crap! It takes much needed attention from genuine cases.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 06:06 PM
1

All this "televised discussion" is bullshit. This is top attention whoring by both of them. Save your sympathies for genuine cases where men are abused and taken advantage of. Not this celebrity crap.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 10:50 AM
12

Yo, I don't think that's the trap he meant
/r/MensRights04/06/20 11:36 AM
0

Exactly. Assuming financial dependency to counter a completely different issue of stereotyping men.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 05:58 AM
24

I got banned for pointing out that saying all men are sexist is stereotyping. LOL.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:25 PM
2

In a relationship (4years)
/r/MensRights26/01/20 03:45 AM
1

Very low conviction rates but still highly likely you'll be arrested before trial. It's a Victorian era law which has been since scrapped in most countries
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:03 PM
5

Also, sex under false promise of marriage is considered rape by law in India (only for the man of course)
/r/MensRights18/10/19 09:23 AM
1

If I wanted to sit there, I would have asked her to get the fuck up and not whine about in online. If she still didn't budge, I'd right up sit on her feet or leg or call the subway staff depending upon how effective they are.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 04:31 AM
4

Nibba, I'm Indian. I'm happily married and had girlfriends before marriage as well. And none of them were virgins. I'm lucky my exes are sane. All I'm saying is all it would have taken was for one crazy ex to file a false accusation. The issue is not about men's sexual rights but of loopholes in the law allowing false accusations against men and no easy recourse to acquittal.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 02:33 AM
6

There are no such local customs. This law is a relic of the Victorian colonial era. Last month, a guy was sentenced to 6 months because his tinder match filed a complaint after they had sex saying he verbally promised he would marry her before having sex. No other proof was required for conviction.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 02:27 AM
2

So?
/r/MensRights19/08/19 02:12 AM
6

But how do you prove intent or lack of it? Consensual sexually active relationships are quite common at least in urban India. Women have used this law as a means of vendatta for breakups by just stating the guy promised to marry me before the relationship began.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 01:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter