| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 104 | Feminism is a Lie (dot com) | Red Pill Theory | jackbauer634 | /r/TheRedPill | 10/04/14 01:51 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | LTR, Not Being Married, Providing SecurityThis is only giving her an incentive to leave. Marriage 2.0, which is basically cohabitation, is nothing like Marriage 1.0, where divorce was fault-based. No-fault divorce/breakups, with financial strings attached, incentivize bad outcomes. Why else have the Kiwi's enacted relationship property laws governing non-marriage cohabitation? | /r/TheRedPill | 30/01/15 05:04 AM |
| 2 | She wants marriage.My ex-ex-brother-in-law (ex-husband of my ex-wife's sister) was divorced in a community property state. The ex-wife received about 65% of the assets, because he earned more and the 50/50 split was looking forward--setting both parties up for an equal lifestyle in the future. Simplified: Woman received more. | /r/TheRedPill | 16/01/15 04:22 AM |
| 3 | She wants marriage.Dalrock summarizes nicely: "You can see this at the micro level with a man whose wife goes Jenny Erikson on him. The courts understand that throwing a man out of the home and taking away his children naturally reduces the man’s normal incentive to work to support his family. How could it not? It isn’t that most men in this situation will stand by and watch their children starve, but they won’t be motivated to produce quite as much. You can confiscate a percentage of his income in the form of chi… | /r/TheRedPill | 16/01/15 04:08 AM |
| 9 | Have you heard of the pink tax?This strikes me as a viable avenue for a bachelor tax. First "prove" that women are victims of a hidden tax, then implement an overt tax on men to "equalize" the burden. | /r/TheRedPill | 03/11/14 03:55 PM |
| 0 | I've even used the nuclear option on the wife...not sure if she is coming around. Either way...I would focus on the little things that put you in a position of leadership and control in the marriage. One thing to consider: Depending on the state, separating money can be the start of a legal separation, especially if the state allows in-home separation. If you have direct deposit you should change it to an account in your name. Then demand she return the $$$ she moved. Also demand sex and find creative ways to punish her if she doesn't comply. Communicate with dread that the marriage is co… | /r/TheRedPill | 16/09/14 06:47 PM |
| 2 | Should TRP be used on my x-partner as we share custody of my daughter?Yes TRP works great on my ex-wife. The basic strategy is tolerate zero bullshit, call her out whenever she's being manipulative or emotional, don't accept her excuses. Don't ever get emotional yourself, just be stone cold and unperturbed. Support her when she's behaving herself, oppose her when she's misbehaving. You have the power to take the edge off of her life in the hard times, and to power to make waves at other times. Always think about what you're giving her in terms of how she's been be… | /r/TheRedPill | 29/08/14 06:05 AM |
| 5 | not alpha fucks? don't despair.This is an excellent explanation. Culture drives politics, politics drives the law. Divorce rape is a legal problem, which is a symptom of a political problem (19th amendment), which is a symptom of a cultural problem (women out of control). Basically our fathers, grandfathers, and great grandfathers all failed huge cultural shit tests. You are here. | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/14 02:54 PM |
| 1 | I Was Divorce Raped. Don't Be Me.A couple of things to consider: Most of the things that can be done offshore can also be done onshore. Unless you're actually involved in an international business, an offshore entity might not be a good choice. That's because there are tax implications, the costs are much higher, and judges have civil contempt powers: http://www.assetprotectionlawjournal.com/tags/anderson-relief/ The example I give, using an LLC with a legit business purpose and business partners, has been protected under commo… | /r/TheRedPill | 11/08/14 04:31 PM |
| 8 | I Was Divorce Raped. Don't Be Me.OK two general principles: (1) A bad asset protection plan might be worse than no plan at all. (2) Offshore/foreign trusts/entities/accounts are only as useful as your willingness to relocate to those jurisdictions. There are some other things to consider: (a) Assets before marriage are non-marital property; however (b) A judge might order you to pay spousal/child support, even if you don't have a job, in which case non-marital assets become de-facto marital assets when the asset seizures start.… | /r/TheRedPill | 11/08/14 07:52 AM |
| 5 | Woman laments her BF of 4 years doesn't seem to want the legal marital contract. TwoXChromosomes comes up with a marvellous answer.Moreover, the purpose of marriage is to start the clock running on child support. There's no reason to get married unless you want children, and if you do get married you should knock her up immediately, since the purpose is to have children. If the average marriage lasts about seven years, on average you pay child support for 11 years to age 18. Make it a red pill marriage and reduce that toward zero. Also a prenup is a must-have, since if she divorces you at the 20 year point, when the kids ha… | /r/TheRedPill | 07/08/14 08:32 AM |
| 1 | Family situation. Potential divorce. Details within. TRP help would be much appreciated.if Betty is legit crazy, make sure he takes video footage of everything to use as evidence if necessary. Yes. Don should move as much money as possible from joint accounts to assets only in his name. Yes, but for tactical reasons. Holding assets in your own name is no help from a legal perspective, but, divorce lawyers are restricted from contingency fee arrangements--so you have to be able to pay a retainer up front. There's a chicken and egg problem which benefits you in the short term to hold… | /r/TheRedPill | 22/07/14 04:23 PM |
| 1 | Aaron Clarey: Alimony was needed back when women were actual housewives and had no income after divorce. Career women don't apply.Also in New Zealand, except it's termed a "de facto relationship" after cohabitating for 36 months: http://www.justice.govt.nz/family-justice/separation/relationship-property/types-of-relationships-covered-by-law | /r/TheRedPill | 28/04/14 03:15 AM |
| 6 | Feminism is a Lie (dot com)OP here. I'd suggest a re-read. I'm a man. The Indian woman is a quote. | /r/TheRedPill | 11/04/14 03:28 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter