TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jackk225 Archive

View 5 posts and 157 comments by jackk225 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What's your point? I tell those people that it's unfair to generalize as well. Although I have to say, I do not believe that many feminists say that all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:11 AM
1

My point was that it isn't fair to generalize all feminists, because it shuts out genuinely good ideas from people who genuinely have good intentions. I guess you weren't saying ALL feminists, but the effect is the same.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:44 AM
6

sodomy laws also applied to innocent, consenting adults though
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:41 AM
1

Still doesn't invalidate my point. I'm not sure why you're downvoting me either, I think it's bad to say men are trash too.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:38 AM
1

I didn't say that you shouldn't disagree with feminism. I think it's kind of silly, but that's up to you. All I said was that you were kind of implying that most or all feminists say things like #MenAreTrash, and I know that not all do.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:33 AM
1

Nice job downvoting me because you can't argue with your own logic.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:30 AM
1

Good for you I guess. That doesn't relate to my point though.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:26 AM
0

Yeah that gets used. But the comment you're responding to is using the fallacy of composition.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:31 AM
0

...what? Feminists are NOT all part of one unified movement, and don't all share the same views. So... what is your point exactly?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:30 AM
0

Hm, assuming all feminists are part of one unified movement and all share the same views.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 06:00 AM
2

Hm, I don't know about the demographics, but if not many women are doing policework and stuff, what do you think they're doing? Among many other things, a lot of them are the sole caretakers of their children, including babies. A good number of you guys seem to think that's not important.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 06:00 AM
1

Way to ignore mothers, for one thing. What exactly do you think women do all day?
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:54 AM
1

...But he already consented to sex...
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:14 AM
1

We don't need to for pregnancies to happen. A gay man could get a blowjob from a bisexual man and that bisexual man could subsequently eat out a woman and get the woman pregnant with the gay man's sperm. True, but the woman receiving oral sex isn't necessarily knowingly having sex with a semen-carrying object, so the argument goes both ways.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:08 AM
1

I'm asking if you believe that there are zero men who don't care.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:04 AM
-1

This kid was a misogynist, and what he did was horrible. His actions and statements in no way reflect the goals of the Men's Rights movement. I disagree with MRAs pretty often, but the things he said and did go completely against the views and goals of the Men's Rights movement, as far as I understand them.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:00 AM
0

This is a very dangerous to be saying in this context.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:53 AM
1

I think it's important that the Men's Rights movement makes a public statement about how awful the whole situation is, and about how he was going against everything the Men's Rights movement stands for.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:50 AM
-1

wasnt this like just now posted here
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:41 AM
4

As a feminist, I can promise you that this is not a view shared by all feminists.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:40 AM
1

If his cum is stolen from the trash, you can consider that rape. I'm talking about when he willingly has sex.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:42 PM
1

We're arguing about so many different things at once here. Can we take these things one at a time please? I have a new question anyway: why is it the woman's responsibility to make sure birth control works and that there is a plan in place if it doesn't? Why is that her responsibility more than his?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:31 PM
1

I don't have to prove that there are some men who don't care what happens to women they had sex with. You juSt now said that there are men who are messed up enough to masturbate to the thought of that woman having to get an abortion. the woman doesn't have to have sex with a semen-carrying object The man doesn't have to have sex with an egg-carrying object.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:25 PM
1

Someone utterly caring is not provable. Are you saying that there are zero men who don't care?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:08 PM
1

I know that it would be incredibly difficult for me to go through that procedure. I also know that in order to get the procedure you often have to face people calling you 'babykiller', etc. Plus, abortion costs money. And you didn't address the possible medical complications involved with abortion. I went over all the options earlier. Sorry, what options are there besides carrying the child to term (then either raising it or giving it up for adoption) and getting an abortion?
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:33 PM
1

Okay, calm down. I was trying to illustrate my point by using an extreme example. My point was that it isn't fair to say that a person's emotions don't matter, which is what I thought you were saying. I was in no way saying that a woman becoming pregnant was anywhere near as emotionally damaging as being molested as a child.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:29 PM
1

Haha, well you're taking that out of context.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:25 PM
1

they have the agency to control what is put into their bodies and the conditions they attach to that. Men have the agency to control where they put their genetic material and the conditions they attach to that.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:34 PM
0

Okay, but their only other option is getting an abortion, which is also incredibly difficult emotionally and can have medical complications. You want men to be able to just walk away.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:31 PM
1

But you do bring up a very good point. I don't know why so many people here are arguing for the right to walk away from parenthood but not for the right to decide the fate of their potential child.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:26 PM
0

Giving birth and having the child is also emotionally and physically taxing, and very likely to have adverse side effects. By your logic, child molestation shouldn't be a crime, because who cares if the kid is sad about it? They're responsible for their own emotions, right?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:25 PM
1

right
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:20 PM
1

I know some are still against contraception. I don't know if they all do, or what the Vatican's official stance is.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:19 PM
0

I'm sorry to hear about your experiences. I do have a question, though. And, really, we're talking above about someone putting themselves in that position. If you do then you have no one to blame but yourself, so don't come crying to me about it. Deal with it. Suck it up and move on. Putting themselves in what position? The position of being pregnant? I don't mean to be insensitive here, but didn't you put yourself in the position of having impregnated someone?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:17 PM
1

Well, read a couple of the other comments here.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:13 PM
2

I appreciate that you actually care about sticking to the facts.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 05:03 AM
1

I feel like you would be making different arguments if you were a woman.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:58 AM
1

Good job you guys, I am super proud.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:56 AM
1

ay
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:53 AM
1

We are a group of roughly 90, 000 individuals who agree on some things and politely disagree on others. politely disagree ...this has not been my experience.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:50 AM
1

Which is kind of silly because by that logic, wouldn't you be killing a potential human every time you decide not to have sex?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:48 AM
1

When do you think the line should be drawn then?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:48 AM
1

You don't have the right to force your morals on other people any more than religious fanatics do.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:41 AM
1

I know that, and I'm not saying that all men could 'just walk away'. There are many who could though.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:38 AM
1

If she poked a hole in the condom, well, he didn't have to trust her about that. He could have brought his own.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:37 AM
1

I actually expected you guys to like that solution. Can you explain what you don't like about it?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:35 AM
1

Okay, now I am confused. I am confused by a lot of things about what you just said, but the biggest question I have is: If a woman opts to keep a rape-baby then the rapist should owe her no money. ...okay, first of all, he is a rapist. Are you honestly saying that it would be unfair to ask a rapist to give his victims money?... Second, why would the rapist owe her money to get an abortion but not to pay for the costs of pregnancy?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:33 AM
1

Do you really think anyone is going to be willing to make that down payment? You're saying that women shouldn't ever have sex unless they can find a guy who is willing to do that. Anyway, he still wouldn't have to deal with actually getting the abortion, facing the protesters at the door calling you a babykiller, possible complications, etc
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:27 AM
1

Okay, I already addressed this a bunch of times. Pregnancy is not easy, it can have medical complications, it costs a ton for hospital bills, giving birth is super painful, etc. etc.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:25 AM
1

How would that solve the problem of men having less incentive to avoid unplanned pregnancy than women?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:23 AM
1

...Why would there be men who think the idea of abortion is a fabulous thing? That's pretty messed up. There ARE men who don't care about what happens to women they have sex with, though. Also, the man doesn't have to have the procedure. there could also be masochistic women who fap while getting abortions ........ew
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:22 AM
1

Are you saying that unplanned pregnancy is usually the woman's fault? That seems a bit sexist. I'm saying that both the man and the woman should take responsibility for the pregnancy, regardless of whose fault is was, because a lot of the time it's pretty hard to tell whose fault it was.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:19 AM
1

Men don't have to actually go through the procedure. And there are some guys who don't care.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:14 AM
0

...I still don't understand how you think that's fair. Both of her options are worse than his.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:10 AM
1

.......that's why I asked for permission.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:07 AM
1

Okay, that's a whole different argument. I've mostly been arguing with people on here about whether the man should be able to do a 'financial abortion' and not pay child support.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:26 PM
1

I think the closest we can get to a solution that we can both agree on is that instead of child support he has to help her pay for her pregnancy or abortion, whichever she decides on.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:25 PM
1

It comes down to this: If a woman gets pregnant, she has to pay a price: either pregnancy or abortion. He is equally responsible for that pregnancy, and should pay exactly half of that price. He can't carry the child, so his two options are different: he can stay by her side and help her emotionally through her pregnancy/abortion, or he can walk away and help her financially with her pregnancy/abortion.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:20 PM
-1

That would all be good, but parenthood would still be forced on unwilling, unsuitable, non-consenting mothers. If she gets pregnant, she has to pay a price: either pregnancy or abortion. He is equally responsible for that pregnancy, and should help her pay that price.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:13 PM
1

I'm trying really hard to be polite! Maybe the child support system could be changed so that you'd have to pay less?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:11 PM
1

I don't. I think your solution would be more unfair to women than the current system is to men.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:10 PM
1

That's why we have to adjust for it in order for us to be.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:09 PM
0

Exactly. Which means that everybody should take an equal amount of responsibility when it comes to pregnancy. The only way to do that is to expect men to assist in some way when they create a child. Right now, that assistance is called child support.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:08 PM
2

The emotional cost is not men's responsibility nor should it be. None of this is "men's responsibility", it's society's responsibility. Are you saying that a person's emotional and medical well-being aren't natural rights but that their financial well-being is? By the way, I don't think men should pay the price for war in women's stead. I know exactly zero feminists who think that.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:04 PM
3

I still think your solution would be less fair than how the system is now, but I understand your opinion. And yeah, thank you for being polite and stuff!
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:58 PM
0

Alright, but her opinion isn't the same as everyone else's.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:55 PM
1

...so I'm letting you know because I assume you don't want people to think that you're blaming women for child abuse committed by their husbands. If you don't care what people think you wouldn't bother telling everyone what you think on reddit.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:53 PM
1

Okay I'm trying to think of a way to answer you and I just don't even know what to say. Are you saying it's okay that "men die in women's stead"? Isn't that something you guys want to change? Anyway, I'm not even going to try to argue because of your little comment there. I have been nothing but mature, and I would appreciate it if you at least made an effort.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:52 PM
1

What I'm saying is that the solution you guys are presenting isn't fair to women. I don't have a better solution, sorry. I think forcing fathers to pay child support is unfair, but that your solution would lead to more problems than it would solve.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:42 PM
1

Okay, then are you saying that when a relationship isn't working out the woman will always ignore the problems? Also, are you saying that men never abuse their stepchildren before there are problems with his relationship with his wife?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:39 PM
5

That's a good idea. It only addresses that one cost, though.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:35 PM
-1

Sorry, how is that fair? It's fair because she can have the baby, not name a father, and give it up for adoption Okay, she still has to deal with the emotional cost of being pregnant, as well as the medical bills, possible medical complications, and the general unpleasantness of pregnancy and childbirth. Then there's the emotional cost of giving her child away. Yes, she didn't want it in the first place, but that doesn't mean giving it up is easy; maybe the only reason she didn't want it is beca…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:32 PM
2

Eh. I wish. Conventional ideas seem to fail all too often.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:23 PM
1

Okay, but wouldn't it be unfair for the man to be able to just walk away from parenthood while the woman would have to go through the emotional and physical trauma of having an abortion? An abortion she would have to pay for? Also, he wouldn't have to deal with people calling him a 'baby killer', etc.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:21 PM
-1

...yes, I'm sure it does suck. Are you saying that we should take away the thing that sucks for men and ignore the thing that sucks for women?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:17 PM
3

Your first idea is a good one, it makes sense. After that, though... For most people, that is not a soul crushing decision How do you know? I'm not saying that's definitely untrue, but I am skeptical, because that would be an incredibly difficult decision for me to make. I don't think either of us are qualified to say exactly how traumatic it is, and I'm sure it varies from person to person. You do seem to agree that it is traumatic and can "cause a depressive spiral". Frankly, however, someone'…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:15 PM
2

Then I guess you'll have to trust me :) Or you can look at some of the commenters here telling me to 'go fuck myself', calling me a feminist troll, etc.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:02 PM
1

Another way to reduce the abortion rate is to provide economic support to people who can't afford to raise children. One of the most common reasons women decide to seek abortion is because they don't feel like they could support a child. Pro-life groups spend millions every year doing campaigns and rallies when that money could go to actually giving people the financial ability to carry to term.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:00 PM
1

Yeah. Like, some people will see a pregnant teenager and call her 'slutty' or whatever. If a pregnant woman has to face that kind of attitude, she's going to be a lot more likely to want an abortion. Of course, this doesn't solve the financial abortion problem, but it's still important.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:56 PM
1

You're definitely right, the real solution is to stop unwanted pregnancies to begin with. Another way to do that would be to fight the negative stigma associated with pregnancy.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:45 PM
2

That makes sense in theory. It's just unfortunate that unlike the man, the woman would have to deal with the emotional cost of having the abortion as well as the cost of the procedure itself. So she would have to take at least that much responsibility for her pregnancy, while he would be able to just walk away. How is that fair?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:41 PM
1

Okay? I don't have any reason to lie about that, and you can see people commenting here who are being pretty hostile towards me.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:35 PM
0

Does anyone actually do that?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:33 PM
1

So are you saying that you think abortion is wrong, but that it shouldn't be illegal (though probably with some sort of term limit, I assume)? I can definitely respect that.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:25 PM
2

As I just said, in an ideal world he would get that choice.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:23 PM
0

That's true, but women who don't want children already have a reason to be cautious about getting pregnant: having to get an abortion really sucks.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:22 PM
1

If you have a better solution to the problem I mentioned I would love to hear it.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:22 PM
0

No, and I'm not trying to disagree with you, I'm just confused. What is their financial incentive to break up their families?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:17 PM
-2

Yes, but women who don't want kids already have an incentive not to get pregnant: getting an abortion kind of sucks.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:14 PM
2

...at some level the mother is going to be aware of this friction and decide that she is going to ignore it because she values the new relationship more. In that sense that's a precondition for the abuse... Yes, if she was aware of the abuse and did nothing to stop it then she would be an accomplice. Are you saying, though, that when a man molests his stepchildren his wife will always ignore it?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:12 PM
2

...so I'm letting you know because I assume you don't want people to think that you're blaming women for rape committed by their husbands.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:09 PM
2

nah
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:06 PM
-1

You're a lot more likely to be listened to if you aren't completely sarcastic. If I try to debate with you will you actually try to be logical, or will you just make fun of what I say?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:05 PM
1

I'm ANTI-life. Pro-DEATH.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:03 PM
0

It's not ideal, but yes. They would be able to get control over the situation by being more careful to use birth control, etc. I know that sounds unfair, but do you have a better solution to the problem I mentioned?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:51 PM
9

Okay, maybe I wouldn't get banned, but I have received a lot of hate mail from members of this subreddit for making comments they disagreed with.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:41 PM
2

Sure, but that doesn't mean you have to identify as part of the pro-life movement. You can publicly advocate your own stance. I'm just trying to be encouraging, I don't know.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:40 PM
2

Okay, that makes sense. I'm not sure that I agree with that, not because I don't think men should have that choice, but because I'm afraid that taking away that responsibility would make many men less cautious about getting women pregnant, making them less likely to want to use birth control. That could increase the abortion rate and maybe increase the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:37 PM
2

I think you should advocate your own opinions. Who says you have to pick one side or the other? Maybe it's not as easy to get your opinions heard when you're not part of a much larger group, but I think you should stand up for what you think is right!
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:30 PM
2

Haha, in the past this subreddit has not exactly embraced my opinions, so...
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:27 PM
1

What was the point you were trying to make by saying that it's always because of her?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:06 PM
2

I know that's not how you meant it to be interpreted, but the way you worded it, it sounds sort of like you mean it's her fault.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:06 PM
1

Well if she doesn't want to have to put up with him then it's not a very stable family, right?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:04 PM
1

Does her mother live far away? Is transportation an issue?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:51 PM
2

it's always because of her. ...okay, i get that this is /r/mensrights, but are you seriously blaming the mother for the stepfather's actions?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:42 PM
1

...In a stable family, the father would be there to support the family financially though, right?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:40 PM
2

If you listen to the call, though, it was mostly the stepfather who was screaming at him, so I would think that they would still see this as male violence.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:37 PM
1

Show me a feminist who wants equal rights with equal responsibility and who wants to share the burdens not just get all the advantages men have without the disadvantages and I'll show you someone I'd be willing to work with towards equal treatment between men and women. Okay, how about me?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:46 AM
1

Okay, sounds like men haven't been forced into the military for quite some time. Anyway, it doesn't matter who has more problems. That's totally beside the point.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:50 AM
1

Thank you for not being rude. UnfortunaWtely, a lot of people who frequent this subreddit do seem to dismiss/deny that voice. Also, why shouldn't mens rights advocates want to work with feminists?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:47 AM
1

Has that ever happened to you? I mean, yeah, I do think that's unfair, but when was the last time the U.S. forced anybody into the military? It's been a while. On the other hand, I personally know multiple women who have been raped.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 01:26 AM
1

My post at /r/feminism was me suggesting that they take MRAs seriously. I was telling them to work with you guys. I'm not sure why that would make you think I'm a troll.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:43 AM
1

Ohh, okay, I can see how that confused you. I could show you the original text of what I posted if you want. It was not a link, I tagged it as a trigger warning and as nsfw because the topic itself disturbed me a lot.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:39 AM
1

Where does it say I posted a link? In the original post I specifically said I wasn't going to name the site for fear of giving them more traffic...
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:15 AM
1

I have to ask, what makes you think I was posting child porn? The title of the post is clearly "where can online child pornography be reported". I was asking how to contact the authorities in order to report underage pornography.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:10 AM
1

I think they should be added because, for one thing, it would help to get rid of the ridiculous rivalry between MRAs and feminists, and it would also better promote a message of gender equality. Having two distinct groups for the two genders - two groups which butt heads frequently - seems to create even more friction between the genders than there was originally.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:06 AM
1

I know that women get sexually harassed more than men. When was the last time you saw a man be the target of cat-calling in the street, etc? I don't actually know anything about the wage gap so I can't really argue this one. I think the point is supposed to be that women don't always have the opportunity to provide for themselves. But again, I don't know a lot about that. Those specific biological functions make a person's life more difficult. That's why I included them as 'problems'. They're a …
/r/MensRights05/11/13 05:59 AM
1

No, we need to get rid of the concepts of 'feminism' and 'men's rights' and replace them with 'gender equality'.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:49 PM
1

Ad hominem.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:48 PM
1

Okay, I don't understand what I said that you have a problem with, besides my claim that women have more problems than men. I'm saying that Men's Rights should concern itself with issues concerning both genders.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:47 PM
1

Anyhow, I'm not saying everything should revolve around women, I'm saying that women's issues should be addressed by MRAs because they tie in so closely with men's issues.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:44 PM
0

We have the same problems, in equal measure. When was the last time you were raped and became pregnant?
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:43 PM
1

sexual harassment. Yes, men can be sexually harassed and raped, but women face it a LOT more often. The wage gap is decreasing, but it still exists. Plus there's just the biological problems like pregnancy and menstruation.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:42 PM
1

Are you implying that the commercials you mentioned where the dad is a 'bungling idiot' are necessarily made by men? Why do you make that assumption?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:03 PM
1

No, I said that women contribute towards sexist portrayals of their OWN gender all the time. What you said was almost entirely unrelated to what I said.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:43 PM
1

Even if it is 'just marketing', it's still sexist. The fact that something is created by a woman doesn't necessarily mean it isn't sexist. Women contribute to sexism against their own gender all the time.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:40 PM
1

This seriously made me cry. i'm not even joking.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:09 AM
0

...I'm calling the writer a pedophile. I don't think all feminists share that view.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:45 PM
0

I'm pretty sure feminists are opposed to rape. Yeah, I have seen the pedophile part in the Vagina Monologues, but that's not ALL feminists, that's just one who happens to be a pedophile...
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:41 PM
1

I feel like if a women touched a child inappropriately they would see that as just as wrong as if a man did it though, right?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 10:23 AM
1

Does anyone know the feminist response to these kinds of stories? Has there been a thread about it?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:27 AM
1

I see. Have yourself a merry Christmas then.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 06:43 AM
0

....what?
/r/MensRights23/12/12 07:31 AM
1

I'm not sure why this is getting so many downvotes. My point is that instead of hating on feminists you should educate them as to how they make you feel discriminated against, and then work together.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:30 AM
3

and yet I have the weirdest boner right now
/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:21 AM
-9

WELL OKAY, ya jerk. I probably should have checked to see if such a subreddit existed before posting here. Whatever, I still stand by my original plan because a lot of women who identify as feminists don't understand the possible chauvinistic implications. EDIT: also, I would suggest that you all to unsubscribe here and make the ERM place be your new base of operations
/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:19 AM
-1

I know for a fact that not all feminists think in this way.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:15 AM
0

Long enough to understand why none of you think it would work, but I still disagree.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 03:14 AM
0

Okay, but the whole point of my suggestion was that the communities intermingle and learn that they're pretty similar.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:59 AM
1

I mean, r/MensRights is probably more full of anti-feminist stuff than r/Feminism is of anti-mensrights stuff.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:54 AM
0

I'm pretty sure just about nobody here dreams of that.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:30 AM
4

I don't get why he wants her to be deaf...
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:28 AM
1

((hugs)))
/r/MensRights20/09/12 09:24 PM
1

Just as an example for those of you who think this is silly, one of my best friends was raised by her dad since she was little and her mom left them. They have no idea where her mother is now, but she most definitley doesn't pay child support, and they could definitely use some financial support.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 11:37 PM
1

They do. Just not with that word.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 03:22 AM
-1

Could you all please try to be a little less cynical? YES, many feminists are sexist against men, etc, etc, but by saying 'feminists blame everything on men', well, that's another stereotype. That's like saying MRAs blame all the world's problems on women.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:28 AM
-8

omg, you people are so CYNICAL
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:25 AM
1

Supporting the fact that circumcision has medical downsides.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:48 PM
1

it's sexist because they are implying that it's ok for a woman to do this, but not for a man, and one must be careful not to also seem sexist, by suggesting that it's ok for a man to do this, but not for a woman.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:31 AM
8

Well, maybe she's black. A lot of black people feel like they're allowed to use that word.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:19 AM
2

I have to say, you may be somewhat right. Women will often sympathize with other women, and men with other men, just because they can relate to the situation better.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:18 AM
7

What is wrong with you? Are you saying it's ok for a man to do that, and not for a woman? Maybe that's not what you're trying to imply, but that's how most people would interpret it, given the context.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:17 AM
4

Well, you could have handled the situation better. Instead of getting angry, be polite, and pose a hypothetical situation in which the genders are reversed.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 01:14 AM
1

Can you link me to an article supporting that? Nobody believes me.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:31 PM
4

I'm so sorry! It would make me sad. There's complicated cosmetic surgery to sort of regrow the foreskin but idk how well it works
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:29 PM
7

My mother said there was no anaesthetic when my brother was circumcised (she didn't subject the rest of her children to that, and she only had it done to him because she was told by the doctors that it was healthier). Also my friend said her son didn't get anaesthetic.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:28 PM
3

OMG FINALLY SOMEONE AGREES WITH ME. I have always been extremely outspoken against circumcision of infants and most people just laugh :(
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter