TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jackmack786 Archive

View 0 posts and 82 comments by jackmack786 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Just the logical response I’d expect from a high ranking contributor! Christ, this place is in serious decline.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 10:19 AM
3

You’re not basing it on “culture”. Honestly, as a Brit, you white Americans do not have a “cultural heritage” from Europe that actually affects how you live in 2019. Maybe 2 generations ago, yes, where in Europe you came from affected how you’d live in a variety of ways. It just doesn’t anymore. So you end up not choosing women based on “culture” but just surface level characteristics. Choose one race of women to go for only if you want (limiting yourself from potential hot girls is soooo red pi…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 10:18 AM
1

It really shows the strength of your case when you don’t address anything the other person pointed out! Doesn’t make you look like a tit who’s been stumped at all! /s
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 10:07 AM
4

That’s a shit reply to someone who calmly explained why something is silly racist bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 10:05 AM
3

Except it’s not “culture and heritage”. Sorry but the vast majority of you Americans don’t have any serious links to your European ancestor’s culture and heritage anymore, except for simply knowing where their ancestors were from. Culture and heritage are the lifestyle and community that they had at that time and that place. You just don’t have that anymore, generations later in a different place. A white guy in 2019 who’s ancestors came to America from France generations ago is no different fro…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 10:04 AM
4

Well you’re basically in agreement (although many don’t see it). There are hardly any white people in the US who still have strong cultural links. You agree
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 09:59 AM
6

Hahaha if recessive genes (rarer) are more valuable, I take it you prefer women who are carriers for autosomal recessive diseases, of which there are hundreds of types?
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 09:54 AM
1

So you basically believe that choosing images still has an element of socialisation involved that would not be present in picking partners in real life. Fair enough criticism of the study, but not really concrete reasoning to back it up imo. Then you started going on about how you don't believe muscles are important, or even necessary. Stop, dude. Leave TRP. LIFT has been the first rule since fucking forever. The importance of it has been explained in ridiculous detail by the heavyweights of thi…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/19 02:01 AM
33

They’d be asking their opinion if they said to the women: “do you find muscular men attractive?”. They didn’t. They instead just got women to rate men that they were shown based on attractiveness. They didn’t tell the women that they had to pick based on muscularity. So the women could have picked based on anything, such as eye colour or hair colour, but analysis of the data showed that they tended to pick based on muscularity. This is scientifically valid.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/19 11:57 PM
5

I hope no one falls for this stuff. All conspiracy tin foil bs with no evidence. People reading this comment and being nearly convinced should look into epistemology, or just a general reading into how we “know things” how we “prove” things. How we critically evaluate things. It will become obvious that this is bs. Sincerely, The Elite (TM).
/r/TheRedPill22/07/18 12:10 PM
12

Exactly. It’s important to note that hypergamy exists naturally. It’s inherent. It won’t just go away, regardless of how the SMP changes. Any woman will still have a tendency to branch swing to a better man. What constitutes “better” can change (although usually the same).
/r/TheRedPill22/07/18 12:07 PM
1

In evolutionary biology terms, that is the same thing. And it’s still wrong. It’s about strength.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/18 09:37 AM
1

Read the side bar before commenting.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/18 02:35 AM
4

“For the sake of diversity of ideas and backgrounds” This is where your bullshit falls apart. Having a different skill colour does not mean you have different ideas. Individuals have different ideas. White people don’t think the same. Black people don’t think the same. Go back to 1800s if you think that. (Ironic right?) So justify again why you would ever hire someone based on immutable characteristics, when all else is the same?
/r/TheRedPill11/06/18 02:08 AM
18

OP, it’s either this or if you can’t be arsed with this, then say “fuck off”. I empathise that you cannot get physical in a public setting because you’d get blamed, but you didn’t have to take it like a bitch either. A very loud, assertive “get off of me” would have sufficed.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 08:47 PM
13

If you don’t agree with TRP, get lost. This isn’t a political sub, for arguing certain viewpoints. The sidebar is gospel, and you can add any content you like that agrees with and builds on from the fundamental principles of TRP. If you want to argue about TRP being right or wrong, there’s a sub called purple pill debate or something similar.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/18 08:46 PM
1

No I do think that a lot of college campus "social justice" feminism absolutely does have an impact. On the campuses, in government and big corporations!
/r/MensRights21/05/18 10:44 PM
1

Your comment, especially that first sentence, was really insightful. That first sentence explains exactly why the "toxic minority" matters!
/r/MensRights21/05/18 10:40 PM
1

Well apparently these days you can be a woman even if you were born a man, and crucially, still have a penis.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:21 AM
4

Literally being the type of autist he talked about in the edit. Cringe
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:19 AM
27

I don’t buy this “small vocal minority” stuff The small minority feminists are the only feminists, or the only ones for who it is useful to call feminists. If the “silent majority” is every woman who believes in women’s rights, then we can stop calling them feminists, since they’re just normal women. Then we can use “feminist” to refer exclusively to those “toxic minority”. Everyone who isn’t toxic minority is just a normal guy/gal. The reason I’m arguing this is because the “small minority” are…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:15 AM
8

Women’s rights != feminism. Haven’t seen anybody bashing women’s right because of this.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:10 AM
28

I’ll allow it for both the day that feminists think it’s okay for women to get those articles about them, which is bloody never. I myself I’m not too bothered by this article itself. I am extremely bothered by the double standard, that’s all. I only support this post because of the hypocrisy of feminism, not because I believe in having this “special snowflake” treatment for men too.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:08 AM
3

I know it seems obvious to you, me and many others, but actually loads of people will think that’s real, and will totally “forgive” this. So all you end up doing is make lots of people think there’s nothing wrong in the OP post. Please say in your comment that it’s fake, or something like “imagine if it was reversed...” Very misleading
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:04 AM
2

That... that is the most autistic thing I have read this month. Holy shit.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/17 10:11 AM
1

Fair enough, although if you think it over some more (I always need time to think of a decent reply) then send over why you disagree any time.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 09:42 PM
3

Thanks for responding. 3 things I want to clarify here. The outrage is less the fact that men's day wasn't recognised, but more that the day for recognising women's issues is recognised (which is great) but the day for recognising men's issues is not. So they acknowledged one but not the other. That is biased and unfair. You point out that it's just a silly doodle. This fails to recognise that the doodle is actually very influential. Whatever is mentioned on the doodle, no matter how big or smal…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 08:08 PM
1

Thanks for responding. You've made a lot of great points which open up loads of topics for discussion. I'd love to talk about them. You still haven't addressed the crux of this thread and my comments: "Google featuring it for women but not for men’s issues." It seems like you don't want to admit that this is wrong for them to do, but you still want to support men's issues. Now I'll try to address the other things you mentioned. If you notice, I also put the word in quotes, to show that "dad thin…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:56 PM
2

Men have historically been in the superior position of control and power. No disagreement there. Now that attention is being given to other groups, now all the sudden it means that men are victims? This is not the case in the slightest. I'll try to explain as clearly as possible. There are legitimate men's issues today (mental health, male suicides, etc). Men's day would bring light to these issues. Google featured women's day to bring light to women's issues, which is great. They did not do thi…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:20 PM
1

If you guys had an issue with google missing an awareness day/week/month, then you'd be talking about all of them in this post. This is "men's rights" so how ridiculous to pretend it's weird that this sub notices the lack of men's day. you only singled out men's awareness as if they did a doodle about everything except this day. No, we singled out men's day because there are 2 genders, and one of them had its day recognised, and the other didn't. The real issue is that you guys are mad that wome…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 07:08 PM
14

No one is arguing that google shouldn’t feature women’s day. If you think that then you have completely misread this. People are arguing that men’s day should be recognised just like women’s day is. If one is and one isn’t there is clearly an unfairness
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:28 AM
13

I agree with that. But I think you’re missing the whole point of this thread: google intentionally recognises the call for women’s issues but not for men’s issues. So in this case it’s not at all about “women are getting attention and I think that means men aren’t”. You still didn’t give your opinion on google intentionally doing this for women’s issues but not for men’s issues. We clearly see that the women’s issues are getting attention and the men’s issues aren’t. This thread is an example in…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:26 AM
4

I stand corrected. The article mentions that it does celebrate women’s achievements as well as calls for the change still needed. So it is clearly both. You still didn’t address anything else I mentioned. Most importantly, that men’s day would advocate for men’s issues, which are very serious. So your thoughts on this? Google featuring it for women but not for men’s issues. Less importantly, but still needed: what on earth is up with Hitler youth and dad things? Do you admit that’s a bit crazy i…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:22 AM
16

Hahaha what is up with that last paragraph?! Hitler youth and typical dad things!? Oh yeah I remember back in the day when Pa taught me how to fish, and then explained why the Jews must be expelled and Germany must be expanded for Lebensraum. Followed by some hunting. Then a lesson on that damn Treaty of Versailles! You must be deluded to think those are the same thing. But actually to answer your question honestly, the point of a Men’s day is to highlight issues men face around the world. Those…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:28 PM
13

Let’s agree that your statement is true. Every day has been men’s day. So we want fairness and equality now. Do we: A) have days being equally men’s and women’s from now on. Or B) Have every day be women’s day from now on, to balance it out historically. Or C, which is very similar to B): have some women’s days , but no men’s days anymore, to fix the balance historically. Option A is the only one that actually achieves fairness and equality. The other options are about retribution and do not mov…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:21 PM
11

Do you find this post confusing? Do you find anything wrong with the fact that women’s day is featured but men’s day isn’t? Honest question, not trying to attack you.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:15 PM
13

Concerning your edit: this has hit /r/all , where people who disagree will vote and comment too.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:13 PM
36

So what is your opinion on Google featuring Women’s day, which is about highlighting women’s issues, but not Men’s day, which is about highlighting issues men face? Serious issues about male mental health and suicide. Men’s day isn’t about celebrating men’s achievements or victories or anything of that sort, it is about issues that affect men, the same as women’s day. So I hope I asked this question in a reasonable way that doesn’t come across as “sorry ass” to you. It is a genuine question.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:12 PM
11

As a “person of colour” myself (although I’d rather just say “brown guy”) I am a minority in my country in skin colour, ethnicity, nationality and religion. I’ve been the only one of these groups for years in my school classes. I can certainly tell you one thing: this has never ever made me uncomfortable. I have always believed that race does not matter and I am no different to other people because of race. The only time I have felt bad about this is when I have been racially bullied ( a tiny nu…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:08 PM
12

Yeah there’s no way they didn’t make an active decision on this. Probably went as so: “Every day is men’s day!!!!1!1!!!” They probably believe that statement so think it’s their duty to pick any obscure person who isn’t a white male to “fix this inequality and bring light to all the non white males who contributed to the world.”
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:55 PM
104

If this is the one I’m thinking of, might not be since they’re bound to have done this type of thing more than once, that lady’s Wikipedia page was made after Google mentioned her and the main thing listed on the page was that google featured her. Not what she actually achieved.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:50 PM
7

It’s both. Solipsism and cognitive dissonance
/r/TheRedPill18/11/17 08:54 PM
4

Right you keep saying this: “born from degenerate circumstances”. What in the fuck does this mean?? Yes the parents are shitty. What does this have to do with the child? How is the child different if they’re born from bad circumstances? I want you to respond, but you’ve got to realise you need to explain yourself more in the first place. You make big leaps in logic.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/17 06:34 PM
7

Well that last paragraph is pure autism. The child is innocent in this. If you disagree it seems you have a really stupid understanding of guilt/innocence. But explain why you think this anyway. The degenerate parents are not being rewarded, nor is their shitty behaviour reinforced, if their kid (who already is out of their care) is adopted. They were going to act in that way anyway. Personally I think there should be some punishment for them having children then failing to care of them properly…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/17 06:31 PM
2

Exactly. If you could convince them to keep good hygiene, style and lift for one year, their mindset would more or less disappear. Exceptions would be those few who are innately socially awkward, and not as a result of their lifestyle choices.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/17 05:43 AM
1

Not worth it when you see how OP "fell" for her and got "alpha widowed" by her. And that's not a cause of OP being a emotional girl. As Neoreactionsafe explains, the whole situation was always with the power in her hands.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/17 10:39 AM
3

Hmm nah not really. You and all the newbies here should just read the sidebar instead.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/17 08:50 AM
13

You're back tracking now. In your previous comment you said there should be proportional representation. The other guy asked if you think there's something wrong when minority's are over represented. The you backed away. Please answer the previous guy honestly.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 02:22 PM
5

Yes nowadays women are encouraged way more than men to go into STEM from a young age. Yes, good point: there are still more males going into STEM. That means that even when barriers to entry are removed and discouragement is removed, men will still naturally tend to stem at higher rates than women. It's not a bad thing to agree with this, friend. It doesn't mean women should be stopped from participating or anything like that. It just means that not having 50/50 men/ women in STEM is not a bad t…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/08/17 02:19 PM
1

If you read the post, OP describes how easily you could leave clues without actually sharing any info.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/17 10:33 PM
6

Why the fuck are these quality EC comments not at the top? Sub is going to shit because of what people are upvoting. Seems like all of these shit posts need a counterpost by an EC to teach people what is and what isn't rp material.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 08:57 AM
2

I think it's untrue to say "feminism is literally just" that. Although you could say that is the main premise, feminism today is more of a political idea held by people: who shame those who disagree with them; often only claim to be for equality in both genders (believing in men's issues as well) yet never talk about even the biggest men's issues while making a big deal about the smallest "non-issues" that affect women (case in point - sexist air conditioning); and use feminism as a label for wh…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:29 PM
1

"Why aren't we teaching all girls that this isn't ok?! We need compulsory classes to teach this is wrong. Teach girls not to sexually assault!!" /s
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:02 PM
1

Why is it then that other subs without the "toxic" mentality don't discuss these issues?
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:59 PM
1

Are you being autistic or something?
/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 04:47 PM
2

Why not? I did, and it was great. Free of drama. Free to focus on learning. Free of feminised bullshit. Of course, there needs to be socialising time outside of this.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/17 10:39 PM
11

See that's the thing. A lot of the people who need this sub (myself included) were raised to be clingy betas. So being yourself is to accept you're learned beta behaviours. Yes that is very self confident to not care what others think, but your results will be shit due to the wrong behaviours we were taught.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/17 10:09 PM
8

You know this sub has gone to shit when this man has negative comment score and that other moany bitch is upvoted.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/17 10:06 PM
5

Never heard of trickle down truth?
/r/TheRedPill08/04/17 08:56 AM
1

How the fuck would he know? You don't think it's the whore whose vagina the kid came out of's responsibility to find out who the father is?
/r/TheRedPill08/04/17 08:54 AM
32

Read GLO's 5 stages of swallowing the pill.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/17 08:35 AM
2

I disagree that OP "never had a chance". He could've have not fucked someone from his company. If she wasn't from the company, then even if she had sex with him to manipulate Billy beta, OP doesn't get any disadvantage.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 01:57 PM
6

That's not how it would come out. It would be "evil crisis manager coerces young woman to suck him off". And that's what Billy beta would corroborate on.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 01:52 PM
3

My bad. Upon researching it seems that they do. I assumed it would be like the UK and not have guns. This makes the video even more fucked up. Why didn't they fire a warning shot?
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 07:30 AM
0

No. You can have your opinion on lifting elsewhere. Lifting is a core tenet of TRP. If you're on this sub then you agree, or you do not post on the sub. Sidebar material. Gandhi was a man who had great achievements, but he was not masculine, especially in a sexual strategy sense, which is what this sub is about. Gandhi lead many people and it's worth looking into how he was an influential and effective leader. However, he was not making any panties wet so do not make the argument that he is an e…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/17 10:48 PM
5

This is actually sjw bullshit think. You said yourself that his points may be valid. That's all that should matter. And the fact that he had experience in India. His skin colour, race, nationality, etc don't matter at all and thinking it matters is the stupid sjw "identity politics" that is not TRP approved.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/17 10:42 PM
2

Yeah, it would certainly help if those "strong wymyn" officers actually had a firearm, or literally any weapon whatsoever.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/17 09:21 PM
13

Definitely this. Also, a lot of young kids are watching videos like "rekt feminists" and "(some right wing guy) OWNS sjw" so they're rejecting mainstream sjw bs.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/17 09:18 PM
7

If you agree with the side bar then you lift.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/17 02:38 PM
5

At that heavy LMR you should've done a flip, maybe it's called something else. Where you just withdraw completely after she says no sex and arrange for her to leave. You act completely fine with it. You're just looking for different things. She'll most likely drop the act at that point.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/17 09:41 PM
2

If he likes to cook, he can cook for himself.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/17 06:44 AM
1

I'm not opposed to what you said, but I'm not at all convinced. What benefits does doing this bring? Apart from in an LTR.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/17 11:08 PM
1

What the fuck mate get off of TRP. Try seduction sub
/r/TheRedPill23/02/17 03:55 PM
1

Yeah you're new. That's cool. Read the side bar first. It explains pretty much everything
/r/TheRedPill11/02/17 12:28 PM
19

This is the blue pill. Talking about the "feelings" of an ltr. Seddit awaits you, friend.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 09:51 AM
0

Nah mate fuck off. It says plainly that you have to read the sidebar. Don't disregard that rule.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/17 11:29 PM
9

Not doing something about getting assaulted (and actually hurt) is not standing up for yourself.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/17 05:58 PM
28

They were in military gear. So people were buying them free drinks. This means the bar owner is getting money due to op's presence. Therefore the bar owner expresses his gratitude for bringing in more money by letting them have a couple of drinks free. None of that is unrealistic or incoherent. I didn't think I would have to explain something so basic to an adult. Sure you're meant to criticise with logic but bloody hell you need to try harder.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/16 12:47 AM
0

What does that have to do with anything?
/r/TheRedPill26/12/16 06:55 PM
6

What the heck can we learn from this, rajesh? I think you should post this to incels
/r/TheRedPill26/12/16 05:55 PM
1

You said you managed to keep lifting in the schedule but not meeting many new girls every month. This is unrealistic and unnecessary. Aim for spinning plates not meeting new girls every month. Keep several plates. Much less time required. You obviously can't have the exact same time spent on girls in med school as you did on your gap year.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/16 09:05 AM
2

You've misunderstood OP. He's not saying bisexual girls are most of the time lesbians, he is saying that feminine lesbians are actually bisexuals
/r/TheRedPill15/11/16 05:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter