TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jacks0nX Archive

View 0 posts and 92 comments by jacks0nX on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Btw, the opposite is true for women, they can rape and abuse a man but, to them, it isn't rape and abuse. Are you talking about those Tumblr feminists or the average one? Because to those I encountered in different subreddit it's universally accepted that women can rape.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 12:00 PM
1

Absolutely correct. The part that I cited just sounded as if you already concluded that the reason she wants out of the contract is "because she regrets signing it", which would indeed be taking a position. Maybe I misunderstood, apologies in that case.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 02:00 PM
0

But you can't just say "rape" and have a contract nullified if you find yourself regretting that you signed it. You don't know if she's saying it just because she's regretting signing that contract. If what she says really happened it's definitely a legitimate reason to want this contract nullified.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:05 AM
0

Small but not insignificant correction: around his neck, not throat.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 10:09 AM
2

Have you actually any experience with the sub or is that just your assumption?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 12:49 PM
29

Oh god, I thought you were joking. That is horrible.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 02:52 AM
10

Well, another point is that she can easily be just a woman who is annoyed that people whistle at the other woman and not a feminist. Kinda like those feminists who see an evil MRA in every man.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/15 03:36 AM
1

That's how I understood it too.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:13 AM
1

I agree, it shouldn't be done on twitter but through the proper channels, and that apparently certain circles (especially within his industry) already demonize him and say "simply believe" is.. shitty, to say the least. But what I didn't see is "back and forth comments with ideological allies", she's made those two tweets if I'm not mistaken. So far she's made two tweets and could be an irrationally acting victim, this doesn't seem too far fetched to be within the realms of possibility.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:22 PM
2

If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, it's probably a duck. Besides, I was talking about SJWs and their behavior. It's not my fault she fits the profile. I don't know much of her, I assumed you were talking about those two tweets alone. Does she have a history of "SJW-like" behavior or is that assessment really based on those tweets only? They are unfounded and unsupported by evidence and she has chosen to bypass protocol for rape victims. There is simply no evidence to her claims curr…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:19 PM
6

No it isn't. It's suspect and irresponsible.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:55 PM
-3

SJWs don't want to involve the authorities until there is a groundswell of support and then they politically steamroll everyone into accepting faulty logic over critical thinking. How did you determine that she is one? You're assuming just as much as the people who already branded him guilty.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 05:04 PM
2

Honest question, how should feminists (western ones, as implied, I think) challenge radical Islam?
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:55 PM
1

Not really, it's not a conclusion, it's rather an analogy. But well, guess a quote won't arrive, so be it.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 06:12 PM
0

You're absolutely right as there is not a single male who went to jail on a false rape charge! Can you quote me, if possible? You really sound like a hysterical feminist who screams about "rape culture" because rape happens, at all.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 05:53 PM
0

This proposal is 10 months old now and was never implemented. Don't you think you're overreacting a little bit?
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:08 PM
2

The article is 10 months old, you're a little late for that.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:04 PM
1

This isn't what's being proposed though. The politicians aren't just naive and think "oh they signed, now they'll behave".
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:07 PM
1

You can support those exact proposals without being feminist. I don't really get what you're trying to say.. That the people in power in Germany who propose such a contract are feminists because they want to tell new citizens that women are equal to men?
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:05 PM
1

A case of entitled women who want their cake and eat it too if you ask me. They don't necessarily have to be feminists to want preferential treatment.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 04:21 PM
1

Oh, no sorry for the misunderstanding. I meant people in the screenshot saying that disgusting stuff, not the people commenting here.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:02 AM
1

Since the title mentions them I assumed you mean "them" with "they". Sorry if incorrect.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 08:35 PM
3

That's exactly what "they" would say about "you". I only lump people together if it's absolutely clear, or by definition, that a group has a certain characteristic. To me feminism is not that, neither are MRAs, since I've seen enough good people on either side. They continue doing that, you continue doing that, which solves absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:39 PM
6

I very much doubt that a lazy couch potato could actually win against her. But that's besides the point. True, ad much as I like her, not acceptable behavior and certainly a double standard.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 02:08 PM
8

Eh, she was born in your great country, so is the shit hole you're describing the US? I doubt that.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 02:05 PM
3

Perhaps here ob this page, but there are screenshots (often facebo) posted every now and then, in this very sub, that show multiple men saying shit like that and with hundreds of likes. What a described in this image is definitely no rarity.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 12:12 PM
2

They think that all men are a single person with a single identity, guilty for everything else that other men have done. Aren't you painting all feminists with the same brush here too?
/r/MensRights12/11/15 12:10 PM
2

I don't see how that's anti-white though. It's perfectly reasonable to say that only mentally sane people should be allowed to have guns. If white men happen to have the most mental problems (is it per capita?) so be it, I'd say it's pro gun-safety rather than anti white-men. I'd put it in the same category as abortion: pro-life/religion, not anti-woman.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 06:38 AM
3

He's constantly spoken about minority issues for a few decades. That seems like consistency, rather than just pandering or due to it being "strategically advantageous", to me. At least on that issue. What would be an argument that specifically adresses white men? Can't think of one at the moment.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 09:25 AM
4

Sanders is pro-everythingthatisn'tawhiteguy, anti-white man. What would be your examples for that?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:00 AM
6

Well, that's your opinion, but she's still a woman, looks feminine (perhaps not to you), thus your argument doesn't really work here, even if I'd agree with your view. Just because she is muscular doesn't make her look like a man, just dig up some beach or training pictures of her. As a MRA you surely wouldn't disrespect a skinny man as "looking like a woman", would you? Same case here, she looks like a muscular woman.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 09:58 AM
17

The usual "she is muscular thus looks like a man"? Really, she looks like a muscular woman to me, so I don't see your implication.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:24 AM
2

Have there actually been feminists who complained about what the article states? This is just a headline so far, no judgement or outcry.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:14 AM
-6

That such stupid methods are eyclusive to Nazis?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 02:21 PM
3

Generally I have little problem accepting the term per se, it just depends on the definition of society/culture/country in question. I've heard quite many different definitions.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 07:24 PM
4

It sounds very sad that you feel the need to refuse such a simple thing out of fear that maybe something bad will happen. Did you experience something like that happening on a regular basis before or do you just feel that something could happen?
/r/MensRights27/06/15 07:20 PM
0

There are about 100 reasons why he would've taken his wifes name.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:32 PM
2

Is there any study for that?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 10:53 AM
4

The difference comes from the fact that most feminists don't consider it rape when a woman forces a man to have sex. Most feminists? Do you have any substantial data for that fact or is that just your impression? That's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 05:12 AM
4

What's truly ironic is that feminism is at least 70% to blame for my choice in this matter. Is it really the fault of feminism or would you rather say women are inherently inferior at such things, let's say like black people, perhaps?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:13 PM
7

As a business owner myself, I'd absolutely never hire women without being governmentally coerced or incentivized via tax breaks to do so. At first I thought you wanted to say "..who are unfit to do their tasks". BUt you probably intended to write it the way you did, correct?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 02:57 PM
3

So, are you angry at those women unfit to work in that environment or the people who hired them?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 08:56 AM
0

Does this sub offer that remindme bot? Would take a bet.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:36 AM
1

Being female is a race?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:23 AM
1

This is a very rational and logical response to the person you disagree with.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:20 AM
0

Thank you.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 09:00 AM
1

I don't see how I am trying to stifle discussion. This is last thing I want to do. What, then, IS indicative of the viewpoint of this movement then? A movement has no voice, but people within the movement using a platform do. This subreddit is a way for people to see what MRAs think. I understand that many different people post here, that's the reason why I ask if this is a good representation of people's opinion.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:06 AM
0

How I want to be portrayed, as a man, is fairly repented by the comments in this thread. Thanks, that'll do.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:52 AM
0

I don't see why anyone would even want to do that.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:40 AM
0

Yes, a forum about a movement for the rights of men. One of the main hubs at that, with 110.000 subscribers. How people interact here directly influences how people are seen in this movement. How is that in any way related to my comment.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 03:34 AM
1

In our society the freedom of mothers to drink, smoke, eat extremely unhealthy and have their offspring circumcised is more important than the health and sovereignty of an innocent newborn. Well, how would you change society then? I agree with the latter point of course, although enough men want their sons circumcised.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 09:25 PM
1

Reading this I think noone else is needed to mis-characterised you or your position.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 09:20 PM
4

Everyone who has commented in this thread or approves of it, please look at what is posted here and tell me if this is the way you want to see a movement for the rights of men be presented. I am completely baffled right now what I have to read in here.,
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:54 PM
1

Please tell me you're not serious here.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 08:47 PM
1

He gets defensive pretty easily, but slander? Do you have any examples?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 01:13 AM
1

They had annotations on the old video explaining the situation. Pakman asked in his subreddit if people wanted it to be re-upload without the controversial section.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 01:12 AM
1

Most people don't use this word in every way possible though. This doesn't exactly help.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:51 AM
1

I often see people complain that men are the primary victims of war (pun intended) when showing in which areas men suffer disadvantages. Given what you wrote in your comment, do you think this is a valid point and possibly sexist? I'd personally compare it to women necessarily leaving their job to give birth to a child, it's just a biological difference, though luck for both genders.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:19 AM
0

This pretty much seems like a non-issue and non-topic for anyone outside of the gamer scene, it's irrelevant to the well-being and rights of men.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 10:01 AM
1

Obligatory question: what does this have to do with the rights of men?
/r/MensRights18/04/15 11:48 PM
1

There are a whole lot of topics to discuss that don't involve feminism. The amount of discussion of such issues has decreased over time.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:10 AM
0

I'd have somewhat agree with you, if it was 6 - 12 months ago. I don't comment often or submit stuff, but reading some of the things here is interesting. The quality has definitely decreased over the last month's. It's the same tiresome topics over and over again so that I've switched to another subreddit to see interesting discussions about men's rights. If something lacks in quality I don't think lots of it really helps.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:07 AM
1

Thanks for the clarification, will have a look.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 08:58 AM
6

Thanks, but that wasn't really my objection though. You said many women have a crazy streak and a personality disorder, then these women become psychologists. The words in italic are those I'd like to have clarification about because they seem rather vague and you said this was a known fact. Since I'm not american I don't have first hand knowledge about american society, so I may be ignorant about this. I just find it hard to believe that female psychologists are a major problem for male patient…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:01 PM
3

Many women are known to have a "crazy" streak, and have borderline multiple personality disorders at least. This is at least a American societal fact. But guess what? These same woman will become psychologist and instead of getting to the root of why women seem to self-suffer, they use their position to classify every male genetic driven activity as a disorder. Can you elaborate on this further? This seems more like your opinion on this topic rather than a fact so far.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 11:19 AM
1

It's not about it exists or not, it's about that it's a completely irrelevant remark. So we've got a news article where a person tortures another one. Someone calls person A a torturer. Another user jumps in and is all about "nono, it's not nessecarily a torturer, the victim could've been really into this fetish you know". It's unnecessary and applies in 0.001% of cases, hence my (flawed) analogy.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 01:19 PM
1

So you're saying that, hypothetically, there's a woman who's fetish is passing out during sex and the guy continues to have sex with her passed out body? It's also possible that an alien descents from the clouds and inspects her body. I mean you can't 100% rule that out.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 11:29 AM
3

Question for you guys here, would you have been fine with her only kicking him off his bike? I personally think that was an appropriate action, given that the kid did something uncalled for and came back for more. Kicking someone on the ground is reprehensible though, no question there.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 01:02 PM
1

I just wanted to correct that statement. What opinion you form from that is up to you.
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 02:49 PM
2

They're not meant to. These women only lots always have light turned on, a close exit nearby and sometimes cameras I think. It's not just a sign to scare bad people away.
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 11:03 AM
3

I don't know about this topic but.. that hash tag is hilariously bad.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 08:32 PM
2

Could be, I don't really know. Anyway, don't know why you've been downvoted.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 07:30 PM
5

Isn't what op is doing also a fallacy? Can't remember the name. I can see the point and do agree, but don't think this should be here.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 06:38 AM
2

Is there any indication that all the people who liked that image are feminists? If not it sounds a bit misleading, that's all I'd complain about.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:19 PM
1

Very funny and original.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:58 PM
2

I liked the first, but most atmospheric game seems like a bit of a stretch to me.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 06:23 AM
7

Really simple solution for that. Develop games with the kind of representation of groups you desire, publish it and see how it goes. Why the need to monitor already existing games? There's no problem if a certain game has males as it's target audience.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 07:21 PM
-1

Thanks for the compassion, it's appreciated.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 10:40 AM
-2

I find it hard to believe that this is your actual opinion.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:28 AM
1

Very interesting read, thank you for this AMA! May I ask if you'd be interested to have another AMA in the usual subreddits, like /r/IAmA or /r/casualiama?
/r/MensRights20/09/14 07:26 PM
3

I was banned from that subreddit, do you know if there are any guidelines to the subreddit? I'd just really like to know why I was banned, since I can't see how I violated any rules, if there are any. I simply mentioned that the woman should ahve been contacted and that she wrote a comment.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 10:39 AM
-2

There is no reason to him the man, don't try to victim blame him! /s This is just a question for more information, don't know why it gets all the down votes.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 07:23 AM
1

While I think that this comic isn't very good.. Over analyzing is something feminists do very often too.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 07:07 AM
9

"Acknowledging that some people lie about having been robbed to fraud insurance means people no longer automatically assume a crime occurred exactly as the accuser claimed. And that's theft culture. "
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:30 PM
12

For the same reason the MRA isn't (shouldn't be) considered a hate group. you've got stupid people on every side and in many flavours. you wouldn't want to be generalized, so don't lump them all together. no, I'm not a feminist.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:05 PM
4

Yes, they could very well all be women.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:34 PM
136

We can not make gender assumptions. Some of the courageous people in these photos may be transgender, and therefore, I can not assume that they are male or female. What? Can the same be said about the plethora of pictures of (obviously) women holding up signs? I don't want to bitch about it, but that remark was entirely unnecessary.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:43 PM
5

Him being jewish is not even a relevant point. the image could've described him as blonde/brown/black haired, the meaning of it would remaining unaltered. Still agreeing though, shitty and cheap image.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:32 PM
56

I would realy like to ask her if boyfriends of raped women are the primary victims of rape. you know, they have to deal with the psychological stress their girlfriend is suffering. just curious for her answer.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 12:34 PM
6

this leaves you with two choices, stop being male or stop breathing. the latter eventually also leads to the former..
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:41 PM
3

don't forget that evil paper with its evil cuts! man those papercuts!
/r/MensRights28/02/14 08:42 AM
6

*TIL fixed that one.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 05:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter