TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jackschittt Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by jackschittt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

So instead we got: Obama won't cut military spending; programs targeting poor still at risk. Obama strips American citizens of one more of their freedoms Omama bows to Republican demands again. etc. I can't see how that's any better. At least if he had vetoed it, we wouldn't have had one of our constitutional rights thrown out the window in the process.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 01:13 PM
74

veto the entire military budget over it? Yes. And then say "I will sign it when you hand me a budget without this provision in it", and make it clear to Congress, the military, and the public that the one and only thing stopping you from signing it is a provision that strips Americans of their basic freedoms granted by the constitution. Put the ball back in the Republicans' court. Tell them you'll sign the exact same budget as long as that one provision is removed.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 05:51 AM
6

The problem is that if I didn't say something she would continue thinking that is ok, because nobody has said anything to her to this point. Unfortunately, not only will she continue to still think her attitude/opinion/belief is OK, she's just been reinforced by 30 of your friends. In her mind, not only is she in the right and you're completely wrong, but she's got 30 people telling her so. I'm not saying you did anything wrong -- I share the same opinion you do. I'm just saying that you're not …
/r/MensRights30/04/12 01:45 AM
9

That's assuming (a) the court rules in his favor, and (b) she has any money to collect to begin with.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:02 PM
17

A man trashes a woman's apartment like that, the cops will be there waiting for him by the time he gets home. He'll be facing everything from breaking and entering, destruction of property, domestic abuse, and god knows what else. A restraining order will be slapped on him immediately. A woman does the same thing to a man...."Sorry, we can't help you. That's a civil matter. You'll have to take her to small claims court."
/r/MensRights04/04/12 05:42 PM
60

Especially considering she "Carved her name into his leather seats". The cops know she did it. No wonder why he was cheating on her. Bitch was fucking psycho. He was probably just too afraid to leave her outright....she'd have likely did to him what she did to the truck.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 05:37 PM
48

I've always wondered how much of a cunt she'd feel like if she found out he sold the 4-wheel drive. Or if she simply trashed the wrong car.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 05:35 PM
10

Sadly, according to the law.....yes. :(
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:03 AM
10

1) If these women are convicted, they should face the same sentence that a man would receive if he were convicted of torturing a mentally disabled teenage girl in similar fashion. 2) The two accused women should not have their identities published at all until they are convicted in court. This should apply to all people accused of any crime, IMO, no matter what gender they are. 3) The 17 year old should not have had her identity published at all. Not just because of #2 above, but because she's a…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:04 PM
17

I've always believed that if it can be proven that someone made a false accusation of rape, then that person should be subject to not only severe criminal but also civil penalties as well. I'm talking about multiple years of jail time and paying restitution to the accused for the rest of his/her life for defamation of character, etc. Rape is a very serious crime (which should be punished by life in prison, IMO). The mere accusation of rape is enough to ruin a person's life and destroy their care…
/r/MensRights15/12/11 05:19 PM
1

I think not and that is why it needs to have a spotlight shown on it, so women understand it is unacceptable. It doesn't need to be rendered "unacceptable". It needs to be rendered "illegal". Right now, a woman can lie to a man about paternity and get him on the hook for 18 years of child support if she can get him to believe her for long enough. Essentially, the courts will reward her for lying. It needs to be reversed. If the woman knowingly lies to a man about paternity, or withholds informat…
/r/MensRights16/08/11 03:08 PM
3

The problem is that if you don't make them mandatory, the women who have affairs on their boyfriends/husbands can continue to hide it, especially if the man in question doesn't suspect anything. In cases like this, if the tests aren't mandatory, by the time he figures out that the kid isn't is, it's likely too late to do anything about it.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 02:51 PM
35

Actually, you slightly misunderstood. She said that a random, well-off man being "assigned" to pay support to a criminal's kid is slightly less insane than making the rape victim pay for the product of a rape. Even she never thought the idea was a good one. She just believed that if forced to choose, a random stranger who at least could afford it would be slightly less shitty than a rape victim. I'm not saying I agree with her, by the way. I'm just putting her comment into context.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 02:23 PM
5

I could not read those comments, as bloggerclarissa is batshit insane. Any post that even remotely disagrees with her point of view is met with a response that goes well beyond immature and irrational, making rational discussion and debate impossible. And people tried. Repeatedly. Seriously....if you disagree with her, she literally accuses you of being in favor of forced abortions, calls you a slew of names, and tells you to go fuck yourself. You don't even have to mention abortion at all -- sh…
/r/MensRights16/08/11 02:18 PM
0

Or maybe he did violate both of them. Some people are into that kind of thing....
/r/MensRights27/06/11 11:26 PM
1

Nobody in their right mind is going to add that to a resume, ever, unless they want their resume thrown directly in the trash can. And i don't know what company you work for, but our company does thorough background checks on all job candidates. So does any credible employer where working with children are involved. I will guarantee you that if you were to apply to the company I work for with allegations of attempted rape in your past, your resume would end up directly in trash can. http://www.n…
/r/MensRights15/02/11 06:45 PM
1

May I suggest stepping away from the computer and stepping out into the real world? Employers use the internet to search for anything they can find on a potential employee -- They check Facebook, twitter, myspace, and Google. And if you were to type "Joe Schmoe yourtown, USA", you greatly increase the chances that if Joe Schmoe ever had rape charges brought against him, one of the top Google results is going to be an article from the local paper with the headline of "Man arrested for rape at Uni…
/r/MensRights15/02/11 01:10 PM
4

Do you have any kind of idea what kind of effect being accused of rape has on your reputation and future employment potential? For the rest of his life, every potential employer who googles this man's name will see articles linking him to allegations of rape. Employers avoid candidates like that like the plague, especially if the job involves working with children. Given the fact that this is a college age man who will have to deal with this for the rest of his life, and the fact that the goal o…
/r/MensRights13/02/11 04:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter