jacobelmosehjordsvar Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-4	Cool to know you guys exist. Not all leftists - some are only left-wing 🙌	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	13/12/25 05:34 PM
6	The decline of males! Why adopt critical theory and expect the findings to hold any reasonable meaning? As I see it, the convenience in critical theory is the tendency to prioritise theory over reality, and then become dissatisfied when reality doesn't match up.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	13/12/25 09:00 AM
1	What are some arguments for female exploitation of males being at the root of all gender issues? 'blue' and 'pink' are not behaviours but symbolic representations and you're actually wrong. Hundreds of studies (from infants to adults, across dozens of cultures) show that females, on average, prefer reddish-purple hues and males prefer blue-green hues when other variables are controlled. This appears as early as 3-4 months of age, before cultural conditioning is plausible, and is found in non-Western and even non-industrial societies. Colour symbolism is a tertiary, symbolic trait, not a pri…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	05/12/25 04:52 PM
0	What are some arguments for female exploitation of males being at the root of all gender issues? I know the theory. It's wonderfully ignorant how it separates things into social constructions and biology as if they are two separate phenomena - wrong. The same behaviours manifest regardless of the prescription. Gender theory is critical social constructivism.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	05/12/25 04:11 PM
0	What are some arguments for female exploitation of males being at the root of all gender issues? The genders are not roles - you don't have to adopt the insane gender theory of Mr Money. He was wrong.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	05/12/25 03:44 PM
1	"The "women and children" narrative is wrong, and works against everyone's safety. Men are humans, too, and they, too, deserve protection." Women and children are not protected because they "deserve it".	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	05/12/25 03:28 PM
2	What are some arguments for female exploitation of males being at the root of all gender issues? Why do you use power as a metric? It's not at all obvious to me that power is the primary driver.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	05/12/25 07:43 AM
-10	Switzerland Has Voted to Not Draft Women No. We don't live in Marx's fantasy world	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	01/12/25 04:46 PM
1	Society looks down on broke men. While still putting men struggling to be successful on a pedestal though. Do you think that perception is wrong and why? It's not as if the left hasn't and doesn't produce specialised grievance cults (great term by the way!). Do you think left-wing extremism is better than that of the right?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/11/25 06:07 PM
1	Society looks down on broke men. While still putting men struggling to be successful on a pedestal though. That's probably because the right is anti-Marxist.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/11/25 06:03 PM
1	Society looks down on broke men. While still putting men struggling to be successful on a pedestal though. Andrew Tate is not successful, although he might say so.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/11/25 06:02 PM
1	Zohran Mamdani's take on the male loneliness crisis is probably the most fair take by any Western politician so far, acknowledging systemic issues and economic pressure as the driving force. This is surprising for the Leftist misandry he's surrounded by, and hopeful. Would you mind telling me how I'm glorifying billionaires? There are a lot of unsubstantiated accusations. Survivorship bias would be if I only looked at the climate predictions that came true and ignored the failures. Do you think I'm doing that and how?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/11/25 05:56 PM
-11	Zohran Mamdani's take on the male loneliness crisis is probably the most fair take by any Western politician so far, acknowledging systemic issues and economic pressure as the driving force. This is surprising for the Leftist misandry he's surrounded by, and hopeful. Why are you able to comment on this? Your analysis is extraordinarily shallow, and you have adopted the classic dichotomy of Marxism - the oppressed vs the oppressor, and then you've lumped rich people in the oppressor category. It's not that I looove CEOs or rich people, but I don't hate them because they're rich. You're comparing reality to utopia. If you put theory before reality, you're bound to become ideologically possessed. Climate change is not an existential crisis - climate-related dea…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/11/25 01:35 PM
-16	Zohran Mamdani's take on the male loneliness crisis is probably the most fair take by any Western politician so far, acknowledging systemic issues and economic pressure as the driving force. This is surprising for the Leftist misandry he's surrounded by, and hopeful. You insist on gnosticism, as many leftists do. "CEO-class cops"... I'm not a leftist, but on the left.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/11/25 01:20 PM
-22	Zohran Mamdani's take on the male loneliness crisis is probably the most fair take by any Western politician so far, acknowledging systemic issues and economic pressure as the driving force. This is surprising for the Leftist misandry he's surrounded by, and hopeful. So your conception of class is intersectionality mixed with a feudal structure? You're less vulnerable as an employee than an employer. Employers bear the financial risk of business failure, potential debt, and the legal responsibility for employee health and safety, whereas employees have a more secure income and the ability to change jobs if their employer fails. A study from 2023 reported that nearly 2,000 of the 3,323 billionaires worldwide earned their fortunes themselves, compared to 314 w…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/11/25 11:37 AM
-9	Zohran Mamdani's take on the male loneliness crisis is probably the most fair take by any Western politician so far, acknowledging systemic issues and economic pressure as the driving force. This is surprising for the Leftist misandry he's surrounded by, and hopeful. What do you mean by "working class"? Income bracket or?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/11/25 10:13 AM
1	Misogyny is not Misandry Do you realise that what you're saying is gnosticism?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	18/11/25 09:30 PM
10	Misogyny is not Misandry No. Men and women operate, and some call it patriarchy.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	15/11/25 06:52 PM
-9	Misogyny is not Misandry It's a difficult subject as much attributed to misogyny/misandry is also "just" general differences between men and women.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	15/11/25 12:08 PM
-2	Male victims of intimate partner violence: Insights from twenty years of research Male victims of intimate partner violence: Insights from twenty years of research It's most likely due to people not punishing violence but the consequences of violence.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	14/11/25 08:44 AM
2	Many studies show black men face more discrimination than black women. Here is the evidence: I hope you don't read my comments as me trying to be flippant by the way 🙌	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/11/25 03:09 PM
1	Many studies show black men face more discrimination than black women. Here is the evidence: No you don't because neither men or women are a minority, and as soon as you start playing the minority-game it stops being about men's issues and becomes inverted itersectional feminism. Why would you insist on moving through the dialectic? There are no "white" or "black" men - it's a misconception. I'm not saying this to be obtuse. You can't talk about men's issues without talking about women's issues just as you can't pathologize one sex without the other.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/11/25 03:05 PM
1	Many studies show black men face more discrimination than black women. Here is the evidence: So why would you play the same game? I have done plenty of research. I kind of work in that sort of field too. I would personally not play games at all. The oppression/oppressor-game is infinitely destructive.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/11/25 02:36 PM
-7	Many studies show black men face more discrimination than black women. Here is the evidence: How is that clear? Who considers it as inferior? Why would you decide on those factors? As I see it, playing the itersectional game is the problem. Let's say we go by "white" attractive woman; what is she supposed to do?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/11/25 12:43 PM
-3	Many studies show black men face more discrimination than black women. Here is the evidence: How does it serve men to play the same game as itersectional feminists?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/11/25 08:38 AM
1	A critique of feminism and Marxism I also agree that it's nauseatingly flowery and insistent on gnosis itself.... "the real questions"...	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 10:42 PM
1	A critique of feminism and Marxism I don't know if you would like for me to answer some of your questions, but here goes nothing. What would you say is a good example of capitalist tyranny? Just so I know exactly what you mean. Is it when ESG does fascism through Blackrock and that sort of thing? I don't have to move through the dialectic, which means that I think the best outcome is always negotiation, invitation, competition/cooperation - competition is mutual (unless you don't learn from losing), and cooperation is mutual (if …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 10:40 PM
1	A critique of feminism and Marxism Are you suggesting that I wrote this: "The real question isn’t whether gender or class is the ‘true’ site of oppression, but how hierarchy itself — economic, political, or ideological — keeps regenerating in new forms.”?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 10:26 PM
1	A critique of feminism and Marxism That presupposes that feminists know what gender-balanced power structures would look like and that power is the fundamental pillar of how we structure our societies. That's another commonality between Marxism and feminism - gnosticism. You also have the pay gap discussion, pension discussion, disparities in pay between jobs held by women and men etc. (economic power). The particulars do not matter so much as the pattern. Marx wanted to initiate the working class to class consciousness, critical…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 10:23 PM
1	A critique of feminism and Marxism How do feminists conceptualise patriarchy?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 08:59 PM
-1	A critique of feminism and Marxism You haven't read my comments then. We don't live in a materialist reality, I think - there is certainly material or the sensory representation of material, but we live much more in a hierarchy of value in my estimation. I'm fine with capitalist idealism as opposed to socialist tyranny. And socialism is tyrannical. I'm not opposing hierchy. I wouldn't even know how to begin with. I think you're mistaken me for someone else dude. I'm not a "what" either 😊	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 08:26 PM
1	A critique of feminism and Marxism So no. It shows in your answer as you're not contending with what I'm saying.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 08:09 PM
0	A critique of feminism and Marxism Have you read 'The Second Sex'? What does men having the economic and political power and exploiting women mean? Was she not calling for a feminist revolution to liberate women? Tell me that's not Marxism, or at least queer gnosticism akin to that of Foucault.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 08:08 PM
1	A critique of feminism and Marxism Did you red my comment?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 08:00 PM
-1	A critique of feminism and Marxism No such thing. Feminism can hijack the term, psychoanalysis, which it has, making "feminist psychoanalysis" nothing more than feminist theory, as it puts the theory first and already assumes the unconscious. It's the same with every bit of critical theory; it becomes offended when the theory doesn't match up with reality, but refuses to be humbled and therefore insists that the theory is right and reality is wrong. Take Chodorow: she wanted to convince people that the genders have roles and that…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 07:58 PM
0	A critique of feminism and Marxism Feminism doesn't rely on psychology in the slightest as it has a conceptualisation of "men in power" regardless of competency or authority - much like Marxism and the bourgeoisie.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 06:59 PM
1	A critique of feminism and Marxism Marxist or not?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 06:43 PM
0	A critique of feminism and Marxism Do you think we can and should escape hierarchies and where does authority come in? Most stable hierarchies are not determined by power or domination but competence. It's even the same for our closest ancestors.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 06:30 PM
-4	A critique of feminism and Marxism A Marxist would say that it's always the economy and class struggle that determines the balance of forces and historical shifts - that's the Marxist doctrine and ideology. Feminism has adopted the pattern but changed the "classes" for identity groups. You see this very clearly in itersectional feminism. Do you think Marxist ideology, or socialism gets us closer to mutual autonomy and voluntary cooperation? Competition is a part of voluntary cooperation by the way.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 06:25 PM
-1	A critique of feminism and Marxism Same axioms, different groupings if people.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 06:14 PM
1	A critique of feminism and Marxism What do you think about Simone de Beauvoir?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 06:11 PM
-3	A critique of feminism and Marxism Sure he does. Explicitly so. The most popular would be the communist manifesto.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	04/11/25 06:09 PM
1	Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communities Why is that good?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	02/11/25 07:38 PM
0	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger Still not playing. Is your presupposition that the differences between the sexes in terms of pension age, income, spending, etc., are solely due to discrimination?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 06:28 PM
0	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger No. My argument is that it might be because men don't want to retire. To attribute it to systemic discrimination is too easy unless we can produce clear data that indicates that men want to retire earlier.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 06:20 PM
0	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger Saying "play semantics" is not engaging. Semantics tend to matter the most in a debate or discussion. I can read just fine. My point is that it's not obvious that the higher retirement age for men is a product of systemic discrimination. You're still trying to attack Mte personally instead of engaging.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 06:18 PM
-4	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger You don't think it has anything to do with men wanting different things, like, for instance, working more?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 06:14 PM
2	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger You could engage with me instead of accusing me. What policies lead to men dying earlier?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 06:13 PM
3	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger Do you think men dying before women is a product of systemic discrimination?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 06:11 PM
-4	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger I'm not playing. What is sexism outside of different outcomes for men and women in this regard?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 06:10 PM
2	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger No it's not. This subject is about economics and the differences between men and women.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 06:07 PM
3	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger Why?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 05:54 PM
1	Is The Left For Men Anymore? How about you substantiate your claim? We can continue discussing what being a Leftist requires afterwards if you like, and it makes sense.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 05:25 PM
1	Is The Left For Men Anymore? Because you said it. I wonder what being a leftist requires.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 05:06 PM
1	Is The Left For Men Anymore? Why does it not require you to be a feminist? In other words, what is the difference between a feminist and a leftist, axiomatically?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 05:04 PM
1	Is The Left For Men Anymore? Why not?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 05:02 PM
1	Is The Left For Men Anymore? Can you give an example of "[...] good people who say smart and compassionate things[...]"? Do you think compassion is always good?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 05:02 PM
-16	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger Do you think it would be misogyny? Do you think we should use feminist theory as a framework?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 04:37 PM
-9	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger No, just LW without the activism.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 03:58 PM
-32	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger It's not misandry.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 03:24 PM
7	Men have higher pension ages despite dying younger What about the spending? Earnings do not figure if women spend more, which they do.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/10/25 03:24 PM
1	Lived Experience I know. That's experience, yes. It doesn't. You haven't explained why you need the "lived". If you had written, "[...] but it is not the experience of being a criminal", it would have exactly the same meaning. You can't experience without being alive, i.e., living it. I guess it would be the same question as before: can you say "my lived experience is [...]"?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 09:07 PM
0	What is the stance of this subreddit? The problem is that feminism hasn't done anything good - Republicans have. Being a republican means favouring a republic over a democracy, which seems very reasonable given the size of the US. I'm with you. Women are just as horrible as men, although we don't seem to think so in the West. You're without a doubt both a good and a bad person, and so am I. What do you mean by equality? Men and women are not the same, and they won't be the same.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 09:02 PM
1	Lived Experience Having intimate knowledge of criminal offending (offences?) is not experience but knowledge gained through studying You can't say you're an experienced lawyer if you have only studied, right? Knowledge and experience are two different categories although knowledge is often derived from experience. Even theory is often grounded in experience. Studying would also fall under experience as you would have experience studying.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 08:39 PM
1	Lived Experience My mistake. Can you say "my lived experience"? What experience is not lived?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 08:27 PM
1	Lived Experience So if you can't say "my lived experience"?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 08:20 PM
0	What is the stance of this subreddit? I know. Not even close to all Republicans are white supremacists. This is moving the goal post. What do you mean by educated? Either extreme would claim to be well-educated. What do you mean by pro-equality? We don't have to move through the dialectic, so you can also just not be a feminist. I am definitely no fan of feminism, and I have done my homework, which is why I'm more against gnosticism than I am against feminism per se - feminism is mostly a covert coercion of women to become the group…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 07:42 PM
1	Sexism against men meets the "prejudice plus power" definition You don't even have to go to that extent, as women have been granted the right to kill the children of fathers without any form of consent. Essentially the concept of power screams Foucault. The strange and terrible thing is that it's so deeply embedded in Western civilization that we have come to think of power as the fundamental relationship between people - insane.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 07:13 PM
-1	Is The Left For Men Anymore? It's not free, either way one might try to hijack the word.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 06:46 PM
-1	Is The Left For Men Anymore? No such thing as free Healthcare.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 06:18 PM
2	What is the stance of this subreddit? "Republicans today are terrible people". That statement has no meaning as you don't know all Republicans.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 05:38 PM
-6	What is the stance of this subreddit? That means you're engaging in exactly the same dynamic.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 03:08 PM
4	What is the stance of this subreddit? I would suggest not engaging in group identity and instead focusing on what people are posting and engaging with that.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 03:06 PM
1	Lived Experience What is lived experience outside experience?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 10:06 AM
1	Sexism against men meets the "prejudice plus power" definition Women have plenty of power over men.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/10/25 08:01 AM
-3	"Women have it harder with grief". Our friend Ana Psychology. That's you moving the goal post. Can a penis become a vagina and vice versa?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/10/25 08:33 PM
-4	"Women have it harder with grief". Our friend Ana Psychology. You're not assigned a gender at birth then. There exists no surgery that changes the sex/gender of people.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/10/25 08:18 PM
-6	"Women have it harder with grief". Our friend Ana Psychology. What do you mean by assigned in this regard? Do you mean recognition? The sexes are not arbitrary.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/10/25 08:15 PM
-1	"Women have it harder with grief". Our friend Ana Psychology. What are trans people?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/10/25 07:35 PM
-5	"Women have it harder with grief". Our friend Ana Psychology. It's a bit of a surface-level analysis in my estimation. Men have not been conditioned to be stoic, so much as women are more sensitive to negative emotion. This is most likely because of the extreme attention and sympathy required by newborns. That sort of unbridled sympathy gets channelled in all sorts of directions, the more "safety" and comfort women experience - some of them are good, some of them are devastating to people. The devastating kind is often infantilisation, which is extremely d…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/10/25 07:34 PM
1	Bernie Sanders on Men's issues Do you think "social conditioning" is a layer on top of biology? And if so, why are temperamental differences the same across cultures?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/10/25 01:08 PM
1	Bernie Sanders on Men's issues Do you think men in general conform to stereotypical behaviours? Or is it that there are differences in behaviour between men and women? Can external appearances make you less of a man?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/10/25 12:52 PM
1	They definitely complain about men approaching women less in the future. So your claim is that men getting together in groups to determine who is the most competent in a given discipline are less manly?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/10/25 12:46 PM
4	Bernie Sanders on Men's issues What are gender non-conforming men?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/10/25 12:44 PM
-2	Bernie Sanders on Men's issues What is men's current material and emotional reality?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/10/25 12:43 PM
1	They definitely complain about men approaching women less in the future. What is it about their behaviour that makes them less "man"?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/10/25 06:11 AM
17	Does the Movember Charity Have a Feminism Problem..? It's repressive tolerance... Again.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/10/25 07:28 PM
1	There's a concerning phenomenon going on in healthcare in the United States pertaining to men that non-healthcare subs don't talk about. Do you think it's a question of enough? I've come to think that talking about something more doesn't make a lot of difference if the premise is repressive tolerance.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/10/25 08:28 PM
3	There's a concerning phenomenon going on in healthcare in the United States pertaining to men that non-healthcare subs don't talk about. Remember that there is a difference between being weak, looking weak and the fear of both. Women receive much more Healthcare in general, and have, probably because societies in general value women much higher than men.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/10/25 07:18 PM
2	There's a concerning phenomenon going on in healthcare in the United States pertaining to men that non-healthcare subs don't talk about. Men are generally less neurotic and less prone to focus on or prioritise their own health. A complete medical history is rarely necessary for providing health services, so although it is a problem, it is by no means the biggest issue. In my country, I find that these issues are best exemplified by the gender differences: far more women are diagnosed with cancer, but many more men die from it. This is not to make the issue about gender differences. Still, it paints a clear picture that men's heal…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/10/25 07:15 PM
-2	They definitely complain about men approaching women less in the future. Why do you think it's a role and not an innate male behaviour?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/10/25 05:05 PM
4	Any Book Reccomendations? There is nothing to suggest that we live in a patriarchy.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	18/10/25 09:20 AM
1	Any Book Reccomendations? 'Self-made man' terrible as it presumes that men and women are costumes, and that if you look like a man, you live like a man.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	18/10/25 09:18 AM
2	Why do men have to prove themselves real men? Either way, if you don't leave you're house, you're probably not a good proxy for reality. Please don't misunderstand me; I'm not trying to demean you. Are you mentally ill? I'm manio depressive myself - there is nothing I want more than to be normal.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/10/25 05:07 PM
1	Why do men have to prove themselves real men? It's not a role and it's not any more prominent than women, but different.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	16/10/25 05:04 PM
1	Performative male Why do you think genders are roles? There are definitely psychological traits that make the higher echelons of authority more difficult for women in general, because women are generally more agreeable than men, and the higher your position is, the more competition there is, and agreeableness hates competition, which is why feminists (and egalitarians in general) seek to abolish all kinds of hierarchies. If women don't have any problems, why do we have quotas?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/09/25 05:20 PM
1	Performative male That's only an assertion though. I get what you're saying, but the point is that biology and society are not two separate things. Women provide and have provided tremendously, but in very different ways, which is also my point. This narrow understanding of what men and women do is in large part what has driven us to think of our differences in this way, I think. Would you mind explaining what you mean by "socially constructed"?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/09/25 05:10 PM
1	Performative male That would be critical constructivist logic, meaning that the behaviours of women and men are based on expectation and not emerging sociobiology. By your logic, we don't have any egalitarianism. There are no countries where the expectations of men and women are equal because men and women are different. No one expects a man to give birth as no one expects a woman to impregnate a man. You might think these differences are inconsequential, but reality proves otherwise. I live in one of the countri…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/09/25 02:22 PM
1	Performative male You can't separate physical traits from psychological traits. The most egalitarian countries produce the biggest differences between men and women, temperamentally. I don't know what you mean by "gender roles". Genders are not roles.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/09/25 02:12 PM
2	Performative male Indeed.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/09/25 02:05 PM
12	Unpopular opinion, recently, this sub discusses culture and the language of the discourse more than the actual issues billions of men face. Yes, they are. What makes a man is being a man. And no masculinity is not a costume but a set of traits mostly emerging from men. Masculinity is a symbolic representation, not a costume. You can't separate biology from the social at it is one and the same. Being a man does not require some special secret knowledge - it's not gnostic.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/09/25 11:27 AM
7	Unpopular opinion, recently, this sub discusses culture and the language of the discourse more than the actual issues billions of men face. What do you mean by "masculinity is a social construct"? Men are being themselves. It's not as if they can be something else.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	30/09/25 11:22 AM
3	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. If you want to get a broader understanding of what feminism is and where it comes from, I would highly recommend reading about Gnosticism and social constructivism.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 04:15 PM
1	Performative male Still no reason to act hostile - weird behaviour. Where is the line that discerns what is constructed and what is not and who decides?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 03:46 PM
3	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. Have you read 'The Second Sex'? Simone de Beauvoir really reveals the sort of gnosticism that is feminism. In general, feminism has a clear gnostic tendency. Scary stuff.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 03:45 PM
-1	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. Okay.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 03:41 PM
-5	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. Carl Marx was a devote Satanist, so that's not terribly stretchy 🤔 It doesn't say that reality is an illusion, and neither did I. It doesn't matter much if you think it's a stretch - they don't. The idea of 'my truth' is complete SEL transparency, aka gnosis, and that "the divine" is not the divine but human, aka human is God. Have you read Rousseau? Same idea. Either way, traditionalism and feminism are not remotely the same. You could also read 'The Second Sex' - "One is not born, but becomes …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 01:19 PM
0	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. Good question 🙌 because it, like every other gnostic religion, puts theory before reality, leading to "them" constantly being "disappointed" that reality doesn't correlate with theory. "Men and women are not equal (whatever equal means), and therefore we have to [...] to make reality fit our theory". It might be a bit of a stretch to call it a religion in that gnosticism doesn't need faith, as it has certainty, and faith relies on doubt. The secret knowledge is that men have the demiurgic power …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 12:54 PM
1	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. I'm not sure I understand your question 🤔 are you asking why it's gnostic?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 12:23 PM
-9	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. Not at all. It's just not true 😊 if it were the case, everything that isn't feminism, would be bad for women. Feminism is mostly a gnostic religion.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 12:07 PM
3	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. Yeah, that's an attempted hijack, no doubt. However, advice doesn't have to be original or new to be good.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 11:48 AM
11	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. You can't be a feminist and simultaneously want what's best for both men and women, though. You are 100% right about the last part.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 08:28 AM
-11	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. What is "lived experience"? Is there any experience that hasn't been lived? Coddling is not for grown-ups 😊 This is how the left preys on insecurity, by the way. In many aspects, it's like the devouring mother.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 08:23 AM
-3	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. Going to the gym and practising a modicum of hygiene is pretty good advice 🤔 to associate this kind of advice with "the red pill community" seems weird and almost like a reverse hijacking.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 08:18 AM
-23	Hasan tries to push some "positive masculinity" as "advice" to young men. No it's not.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/09/25 08:13 AM
0	Men having views that are incompatible with feminist ideology is not misogynistic, unless they try to force others to adopt those views. No I don't. None of what I have described is stereotypical although it is categorical. The reason we can say that men are punished more harshly than women is based on cases.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/09/25 06:59 PM
0	Men having views that are incompatible with feminist ideology is not misogynistic, unless they try to force others to adopt those views. That's too much of a blanket statement, as it actually isn't true, although men tend to get punished more harshly for similar crimes. We indeed have a judicial bias against men in terms of physical violence, but I think you could argue that it is because the consequences of violent men are more severe than violent women. That, however, creates a problem when women are not punished for relational violence or cluster B psychopathic behaviours.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/09/25 06:14 PM
1	Men having views that are incompatible with feminist ideology is not misogynistic, unless they try to force others to adopt those views. That's not your basis for claiming this, right? Only above a certain level, otherwise it helps 😊 men really do have higher pain tolerance it seems. Some people tend to think that this is because of "societal expectations", whatever that means, but the fact remains that society and biology are a feedback loop, not separate entities.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/09/25 03:54 PM
1	Men having views that are incompatible with feminist ideology is not misogynistic, unless they try to force others to adopt those views. There are several sociobiological reasons and biological factors as to why men both have a higher threshold and higher tolerance: competition for mates, physical conflict, working outside and working in physically laborious jobs (almost all men and historically stable). Testosterone is almost like a "natural" painkiller.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/09/25 03:31 PM
1	Performative male You didn't. My question is about social constructivism 🙌 No reason to be hostile. My question remains the same: do you believe that men and women have roles and that these are constructed?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/09/25 02:56 PM
3	Men having views that are incompatible with feminist ideology is not misogynistic, unless they try to force others to adopt those views. There is a plethora of studies showing that men have a higher pain threshold than women, and these studies have been replicated many times over. It's the same for neuroticism. The fact that you know men who are more sensitive to pain than some women you know, bears little to no relevance in terms of general pain sensitivity - these differences are not absolute but general. Men and women experience the same amount of anger; however, the notion that men are more physically aggressive than women is…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/09/25 02:52 PM
2	Men having views that are incompatible with feminist ideology is not misogynistic, unless they try to force others to adopt those views. It's challenging to conduct a rigorous statistical analysis on the concept of "not being taken seriously," as it involves multiple factors such as assertiveness, hierarchical position, and the definition of what being taken seriously means. There is a notable distinction between feeling unfairly treated and actually being mistreated. While these feelings may correlate, they do not necessarily align. In general, women tend to be more sensitive to negative emotions than men. This means that when b…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/09/25 02:23 PM
1	Examples of Subtle, or Outright, Hostility Towards Men in Left Messaging By ascribing all the malevolence to the right and none of it to the left. For instance, feminism is without a doubt a leftist movement of radical "egalitarianism" which is evident when you read both contemporary feminist literature but also when you read Camilla Collett, Simone de Beauvoir and so on. Was Carl Marx a right-winger?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/09/25 10:30 AM
1	Performative male That doesn't answer the questions. If they are roles, it would definitely be a construction; however, these so-called "roles" are stable across cultures and throughout history, meaning that they're sociobiologically determined. What remains is the fact that "gender roles" is a convenient term to use as a battering ram for political goals and nothing more. As it turns out, the differences between men and women are not constructions but emerging sociobiological traits.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	28/09/25 10:26 AM
0	Examples of Subtle, or Outright, Hostility Towards Men in Left Messaging What you're doing is called repressive tolerance, by the way 😬	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/09/25 02:47 PM
8	Performative male It's not "performative" in the feminist sense, but it's hard to dispute that men (and women) perform to attract the other. It's not a social construct though, as we would do so without language.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/09/25 08:15 AM
-4	Performative male Do you believe that genders have roles and that what men and women do is constructed?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/09/25 08:13 AM
1	Examples of Subtle, or Outright, Hostility Towards Men in Left Messaging Does the left have any pathologies in the extreme? Can it?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	26/09/25 09:21 PM
1	Examples of Subtle, or Outright, Hostility Towards Men in Left Messaging Who's on the left?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	25/09/25 06:29 PM
2	Examples of Subtle, or Outright, Hostility Towards Men in Left Messaging Who doesn't hate men?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	25/09/25 11:37 AM
2	Examples of Subtle, or Outright, Hostility Towards Men in Left Messaging Do you think conservatives hate men?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	25/09/25 06:43 AM
-1	Examples of Subtle, or Outright, Hostility Towards Men in Left Messaging I'm not a male advocate 😊	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	23/09/25 08:01 AM
1	Mgtow and Patriarchy Oh no. That wasn't my point - my point is that being caring is not the same as being good. We have come to a place where people use the word "empathy" as a proxy for being good, which is so dumb it's difficult to imagine how we've ended up here 😬 We use empathy to torture, lie, steal and abuse.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/09/25 01:16 PM
1	Mgtow and Patriarchy What you just wrote here is why we don't live in a patriarchy 👍	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/09/25 12:53 PM
1	Mgtow and Patriarchy Yeah. I don't really get that idea, as human males are much more prone to lekking, and our hierarchies are mostly governed by competence, not dominance. It's exactly the same for chimpanzees - the males who "govern" by force are destined to be overthrown, whereas the competent, generous males reciprocate and negotiate. It seems to me that the "sex in private" part is a little far-fetched, given what we see during pride parades, festivals and so on. What is your take on feminism in general? You g…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/09/25 12:49 PM
1	Mgtow and Patriarchy It has a somewhat childlike view of people. Have you read 'The Gulag Archipelago'? The article divides people into two categories: mean vs. caring - caring can be mean, and mean can be caring. To be caring is not to be good, which is exemplified best in the devouring mother-archetype and in cluster B psychopathy. They claim victimhood because they see themselves as very caring (good), and that "care" is always undervalued in their worldview. It's also a feminist trope. These leftist ideologues a…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/09/25 12:18 PM
1	Mgtow and Patriarchy Genghis Khan is really the exception. As all of our children are born, what can be considered premature, it's a strong indicator for K and not so much for R, although I see what you mean. It's true that we have a small proportion of R-strategy, but it pales in comparison. The human species has pair bonding built into our biology, as evident from the changes in men's hormones when their spouse becomes pregnant. That's actually pretty wild, when you think about it.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/09/25 12:10 PM
1	Mgtow and Patriarchy The article is quite misleading though 😬	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/09/25 11:43 AM
3	Mgtow and Patriarchy To me, the weird thing is that we don't need any disciplines to know that sex and pair bonding are crucial - it's axiomatic. It's a completely unreasonable position to say that sex is like having a yacht or a pet tiger. What always gets me is the fact that these radicals have a profound issue with sociobiology; they desperately want to separate the fact that we're social from biology, and then you get social constructivism, which leads to them being able to say "that's a social construction".	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/09/25 11:39 AM
1	Mgtow and Patriarchy Well said 🙌	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/09/25 10:56 AM
-1	Examples of Subtle, or Outright, Hostility Towards Men in Left Messaging It's not as if Marxism is any less malevolent to begin with.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	22/09/25 08:01 AM
3	Examples of Subtle, or Outright, Hostility Towards Men in Left Messaging Leftist, yes, very much. It shares almost all its axioms with Marxism from gnostic theology to feminist economics	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/09/25 09:07 PM
8	Examples of Subtle, or Outright, Hostility Towards Men in Left Messaging Hate is no less prevalent on the right than on the left - what you're engaging in is repressive tolerance.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/09/25 03:28 PM
1	Examples of Subtle, or Outright, Hostility Towards Men in Left Messaging How progressive should Gen Z be? Do you think it's wrong for them to be conservatives?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/09/25 08:17 AM
11	Latvia prepares for mandatory conscription of women Yes. Gender equality can't be women's advocacy. The entire scheme doesn't make any sense, except for the convenience of using women's grievances as a political battering ram. The sentiment does not care about women, but about the group possessing the "revolutionary energy". It's straight up Herbert Marcuse.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	19/09/25 08:25 PM
3	Mgtow and Patriarchy "Chasing relationships" is very much instinctual. It's present in every single species, including plants, in both male and female forms. Your position is profoundly Rousseauian, which is something you might consider when contemplating your worldview. Human sociality and nature are best construed as a feedback loop, in my opinion, although I also think it's impossible to separate one from the other. Perhaps it would be interesting for you to educate yourself on reproductive strategies in general,…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	19/09/25 04:53 PM
17	Latvia prepares for mandatory conscription of women That's profoundly contradictory - there is no such thing as gender equality for women.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	19/09/25 04:41 PM
1	How partisanship is ruining my mental health I believe that rights and freedoms can sometimes be in conflict. The more rights one individual has, the less freedom others may enjoy, and vice versa. For instance, if I have the right to free speech, it means that others cannot freely silence me, even though they may have the opportunity to do so. You are right to observe that many people often confuse freedom with hedonism. Pursuing hedonism can lead to problematic outcomes, as many desires can encroach upon the rights of others. What motivat…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	11/09/25 07:55 AM
1	How partisanship is ruining my mental health Equal opportunities can never be the same as equal outcomes - it's contradictory for the reasons you so eloquently laid out. Can you help me distinguish freedoms, rights and opportunities? I've been struggling with this conundrum for some time.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	10/09/25 07:12 PM
2	A lot of women not being able to tell the difference between misogyny and equality, is not a joke. Oh sorry, I mistook you for the author of the original comment 😅 Yeah, I know what you're saying. It's exactly like DEI, ESG etc.. I think your analysis is a bit off, although the surface is surely misandrist. It's legitimation through paralogy.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	08/09/25 07:11 PM
2	A lot of women not being able to tell the difference between misogyny and equality, is not a joke. You're not making any sense.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	08/09/25 07:01 PM
0	A lot of women not being able to tell the difference between misogyny and equality, is not a joke. How is that patriarchal socialisation?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	08/09/25 06:06 PM
1	How partisanship is ruining my mental health I think you may have some ill-defined premises to start off with. How do you define equality and fairness generally?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/25 07:17 PM
1	The male burden of performance perfectly articulated I see where you're coming and I don't disagree. Imagine this: women are more agreeable than men, and more women tend towards vulnerable narcissism and HPD. If you add a Marxist ideology and mix in some critical theory (feminism) along with the ever-present Fabian socialist advances... Do you see what I am saying? The ideology serves as a platform and vice versa.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/25 07:16 PM
-2	A lot of women not being able to tell the difference between misogyny and equality, is not a joke. It's probably to seem compassionate and sympathetic more so, I think.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/25 07:09 PM
1	A lot of women not being able to tell the difference between misogyny and equality, is not a joke. They are interested as long as the getting is good so to speak. Discent is difficult if you're primarily agreeable.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/25 04:51 PM
1	The male burden of performance perfectly articulated Have you read 'Repressive Tolerance'? I think your point about some women not contending with criticism is more an ideological trait than it is female 😊	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/25 04:07 PM
1	The male burden of performance perfectly articulated I agree with your first point although I don't think there is any difference between standpoint theory and the fact that all humans are different depending on your level of analysis. These differences between the sexes are not absolute, meaning that men can be agreeable and women, disagreeable - the point is that, generally, men tend to be more disagreeable and vice versa. And these differences are without a doubt sociobiologically determined. Your analogy about mirrors is true but the issue is …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/25 03:57 PM
20	A lot of women not being able to tell the difference between misogyny and equality, is not a joke. Would you mind explaining your terms? Patriarchal socialisation and mansplaining. None of them make sense to me 😅	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/25 03:48 PM
2	A lot of women not being able to tell the difference between misogyny and equality, is not a joke. The only problem with that theory, as I see it, is the premise. I don't think, thinking in terms of demand and service is a good way to frame communication to start with. It has to be negotiation.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/25 03:46 PM
0	The male burden of performance perfectly articulated I don't think standpoint theory makes any sense as it has to be gnostic, which in turn makes even less sense. I don't think of our consciousness as opposed to or different from our physical bodies. That's also why I don't see any value in the term "social construction". You're definitely right that tyrannical agreeableness has a lot of overlap with communism and socialism in general, although I think it also has a lot to do with women in general as they are more prone to agreeableness than men, …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/25 02:43 PM
-2	A lot of women not being able to tell the difference between misogyny and equality, is not a joke. You could sum it up by saying women are more agreeable and men are more disagreeable 😊 whether it's politics, social issues, confrontation or trouble in your friend group women are more likely to distance themselves whereas men are more willing to confront.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/25 02:14 PM
2	The male burden of performance perfectly articulated Do you think being self-centred is what is causing people to not discuss difficult problems? I think it has much more to do with the tyranny of agreeableness.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	07/09/25 08:08 AM
1	A Gen Z therapist reflects on how misandry has contaminated modern mental health. What do you mean by non-binary?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	05/09/25 07:23 PM
3	This is why male-only mandatory military service (conscription, draft) is pure slavery and needs to be, at the very least, talked more So do you think the right-leaning are only wrong on this matter and the left-leaning are only right?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	01/09/25 05:34 PM
2	This is why male-only mandatory military service (conscription, draft) is pure slavery and needs to be, at the very least, talked more What is the equivalent?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	01/09/25 05:32 PM
3	This is why male-only mandatory military service (conscription, draft) is pure slavery and needs to be, at the very least, talked more So you think it's like the term "oppression" for the left?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	01/09/25 09:15 AM
5	This is why male-only mandatory military service (conscription, draft) is pure slavery and needs to be, at the very least, talked more I think there is something to be said for the fact that in most countries almost nobody had the right to vote. Something I notice often being omitted from the argument about the right to vote. 15% of people had the right to vote by 1900 in a lot of Western countries. The right to vote also used to be accompanied by a plethora of duties, not least the draft - cleaning up horse manure in the streets (no small task 😳), cleaning latrines, fire brigades and you even had to own property at the same ti…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/08/25 10:00 PM
3	This is why male-only mandatory military service (conscription, draft) is pure slavery and needs to be, at the very least, talked more If you think it's very diverse wouldn't it be a mistake to say "we"? I might be a bit allergic to the collectivist viewpoint as it is at odds with reality. I don't see conservatives wanting to preserve inequality as such 🤔 the problem with equality is that it's an ill-defined term. Inequality is not inherently bad as it also means that extraordinarily talented people get to use that talent. Equality can only be regressive as there will always be someone worse off than you, and it also has to equ…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/08/25 09:28 PM
6	This is why male-only mandatory military service (conscription, draft) is pure slavery and needs to be, at the very least, talked more What rights did women not have in 1950 compared to men? And did they have more or less freedom than men? Before people got the right to vote women, in many cases, had more freedom than men, in terms of relocating, work, responsibilities etc. In my country, for instance, women were exempt from serfdom and men were not.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/08/25 08:54 PM
0	This is why male-only mandatory military service (conscription, draft) is pure slavery and needs to be, at the very least, talked more Yeah, that's a problem, given that you would have to insist that you can be switched with anyone who claims to have a leftist ideology. You can be left of centre and still speak for yourself. I would love for you to answer the questions if you can 😊 Do you think that hierarchies can be abolished? Seeing as you probably would put leftist ideology as better than, let's say, conservatism, you have already made a hierarchy of value yourself, which is sure to manifest socially. I'm unsure of what you…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/08/25 08:50 PM
-6	This is why male-only mandatory military service (conscription, draft) is pure slavery and needs to be, at the very least, talked more Who is "we"? You're making a lot of unsubstantiated assertions here, unfortunately. As change is not inherently good, it leaves a lot to be desired in your argument. What social hierarchy do you want to change, to what end, and what is the evidence that this change will be for the better? Do you think the lack og gnosis, makes an argument worthless? Could you not make this critique of any claim? I'm not particularly concerned with correctness so much as 'better' or 'good'. Neither am I arguing t…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/08/25 08:09 PM
-2	Ukraine now allows males aged 18-22 (inclusive) to leave a country. Required documents: passport and a military ID What do you mean by "dehumanising"? It seems a bit too Rousseauian.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/08/25 06:52 PM
1	LWMA is looking for new mod(s) I am definitely interested. Please DM me.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/08/25 06:42 PM
5	This is why male-only mandatory military service (conscription, draft) is pure slavery and needs to be, at the very least, talked more It's not empathy but sympathy 😊	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/08/25 06:31 PM
-2	This is why male-only mandatory military service (conscription, draft) is pure slavery and needs to be, at the very least, talked more Is there something wrong with being conservative or looking to biology to try to understand this matter? Sociobiological differences between men and women are undeniable.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	31/08/25 06:30 PM
2	Ukraine now allows males aged 18-22 (inclusive) to leave a country. Required documents: passport and a military ID What is the alternative? Do their lives matter less because of their sacrifice?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/08/25 04:55 PM
2	How the right is actually hurting men more than the left. You're not answering any of the questions I asked 🤔 It's not that you have to at all, but you didn't. If anyone talks about family, they're implicitly talking about children.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/08/25 12:23 PM
2	How the right is actually hurting men more than the left. I think you're confusing me with someone else. I didn't ask what men and women can be in terms of family.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/08/25 10:04 AM
3	How the right is actually hurting men more than the left. The lack of answers, I guess 😊	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/08/25 09:19 AM
4	How the right is actually hurting men more than the left. Is this a reply to my questions?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/08/25 09:15 AM
2	How the right is actually hurting men more than the left. How are they roles? What do you mean by "sustainable alternatives"? Do you think men and women can be anything other than men and women?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/08/25 09:10 AM
-1	How the right is actually hurting men more than the left. The country with the most egalitarian policies in the world, does not push for equality but equity. Do you think men and women should have different rights?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/08/25 09:08 AM
1	How the right is actually hurting men more than the left. Radical leftism also advocates for capital, although it tends to dress it up in compassion and "the greater good" - you see this in ESG, DEI, SDG and so on. Socialism requires an initiated elite (something like a political gnostic priesthood) to usher in the utopia (communism). This elite is intended to use centralised governance to redistribute and control capital, media, corporations, institutions etc.. Mainstream media is definitely dominated by the leftist mentality, as they have an active p…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	29/08/25 09:05 AM
1	Whether you like it or not. Gender contradictions play a huge role in men's issues. Yes, they do, and I don't blame them - if, say, Eddie Hall wanted to smack me around, I'd use an ashtray too. I think it's interesting that we don't punish violence per se, but mostly the consequences of violence. Weirdly, women touch men more than men touch women, but we still have MeToo 🤔 I wonder what would happen if men started victimising themselves for women touching them.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/08/25 06:39 PM
1	The only emotion men can show is indifference. But society still hates that. And they also hate the fact they can't do nothing about it. I think we should try to define both terms before making blanket dialectic statements. If anything I don't think playing the same game as the feminists will do anyone any good.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/08/25 01:47 PM
2	Whether you like it or not. Gender contradictions play a huge role in men's issues. Do you think the other way makes sense?	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/08/25 01:38 PM
2	Whether you like it or not. Gender contradictions play a huge role in men's issues. Why advocate for men's issues and not for issues in general? I hope this doesn't read as a bad-faith question as it's not 🙌 I don't think you can pathologise one sex without the other, and that goes for issues too, so if men have problems women have pro lens and vice versa.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/08/25 12:10 PM
2	Whether you like it or not. Gender contradictions play a huge role in men's issues. It's also a stretch to say that men are more violent as women hit men more. We rarely punish violence in and of itself - we tend to punish based on the consequences. As the physical consequences of women hitting men are almost always negligible we tend not to punish violent women as we do violent men. On top of that, women hit men with higher relative force, meaning that the impact is closer to the average woman's maximum physical output than it is when men hit women. The feminists are very hone…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/08/25 09:51 AM
2	Whether you like it or not. Gender contradictions play a huge role in men's issues. It's called repressive tolerance 👍 quite terrifying.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/08/25 09:19 AM
3	Whether you like it or not. Gender contradictions play a huge role in men's issues. It's actually also a very feminist (Marxist) thing as feminism is also gnosticism, meaning that they possess "hidden" knowledge (critical consciousness) and believe that we live in a patriarchal system built by men for men (demiurgic system). As they also believe the sexes are nothing but social constructs, it's easy to manipulate any institution or system if that premise is accepted. I would recommend reading up on the dialectic of the left if you or anyone else is interested. I think what you'…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	27/08/25 09:17 AM