TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jakelove12 Archive

View 0 posts and 147 comments by jakelove12 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

It’s so fucked up, like the hunger games except it literally actually happened.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 01:41 AM
19

The top post in the thread in r/science is about how hard this must have been for mothers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 12:21 AM
30

If feminine behavior is undesirable in men because of misogyny, wouldn’t that same behavior be undesirable in women? Wouldn’t you expect, if the root of “this thing is bad” comes from hating women, that women would be treated just as negatively as men are for presenting feminine traits? Tell me a woman wearing a dress and a man wearing a dress gets the same reaction from people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/23 08:29 PM
40

Removing a finger is worse than removing a finger nail. Both are mutilation.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 06:05 PM
6

It’s because women are the ones who get pregnant. There’s just, biologically, more consequences to having sex for women. That’s literally it. Having a son who’s a slut means he’s maybe out of the house a lot at night. Having a daughter who’s a slut means she could find herself dead from the health complications of pregnancy. It means another mouth to feed. It means another body to clothe. It’s not fair. But it’s why the double standard exists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/22 01:05 AM
29

I have. Do you make it a habit to investigate the sexuality and parental status of every person you come across in target specifically?
/r/MensRights19/05/22 12:35 AM
3

You are struggling to make this somehow controversial or give it more meaning than it has. A book about pineapples would generally be expected to feature a pineapple on the cover. I genuinely don’t understand what you’re even arguing.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 12:06 AM
1

What are you even talking about? Yes most families feature a mom and a dad what on earth is your point and what does this have to do with it somehow being wrong for a book about fathers for Father’s Day featuring fathers?
/r/MensRights18/05/22 11:48 PM
7

So it’s bad that Father’s Day themed books about fathers for Father’s Day are featuring…. fathers? Would you rather the focus be on mothers?? I feel like a “lets include mom on Father’s Day!!” book wouldn’t be very popular with this sub… It’s not parents day it’s Father’s Day. The only reason that one has both parents on it is because in families with gay male parents both of those parents are fathers.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 11:25 PM
53

Ironic that the only cover featuring actual human beings is the one you point out as being out of place for representing people who potentially shop at target. Also gay ppl shop at target wtf do you think they do, survive without the need for groceries on photosynthesis?
/r/MensRights18/05/22 11:01 PM
20

Mother’s Day was on the 8th, I’m sure you could have found a bunch of mother themed books and gifts in target then…. Why is it a conspiracy theory for you that fathers day themed books feature fathers?
/r/MensRights18/05/22 08:25 PM
5

It’s a book for Father’s Day and some families have two fathers… wtf is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights18/05/22 08:16 PM
11

It’s for families with two dads you moron.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 07:44 PM
2

Psychologist recommended treatment for gender dysphoria is transitioning.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 06:23 PM
5

Dismissing suicide attempts by women is not the solution.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:23 PM
9

Mental gymnastic-ing the preferential treatment of women somehow into an example of sexism against women, is just another example of the very phenomenon you’re attempting to address in the first place. It is possible for sexism to exist against men without bizarro fun-house mirroring it into “it’s really about misogyny”.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 09:00 PM
8

The state of this sub...
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:49 PM
3

Why does this sub consistently insist on embarrassing itself? Why is this posted here?
/r/MensRights02/07/18 05:29 AM
-2

I think you meant to post this to /r/cringe Edit: lmfao OP literally saw this on /r/im14andthisisdeep and posted it here. Yall are dumb.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 11:09 PM
2

Get this trash out of here.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 09:22 PM
0

As if people in this sub don't make fun of fat ugly feminists. Good lord, go upload some girl's tinder profile or something if you want to complain about body standards. We really don't need to be a voice of compassion and understanding for actual nazis. This sub needs to stop upvoting fucking trash.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 02:21 AM
2

Why is this posted here?
/r/MensRights05/08/17 03:28 PM
3

Why does this shitpost have upvotes?
/r/MensRights26/07/17 03:54 AM
9

The answer to this question is so clear, simple, and easy to grasp that I feel like anyone who actually asks it isn't genuine. "I have it done bla bla bla no problem bla bla bla" Con-fucking-grats. Some dudes get their dick hole pierced, and they're obviously happy with it. Nobody gives a flying fuck what you and your penis are happy with.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:38 PM
2

Honestly if someone says 'Stop', you stop. If you don't, I don't think it's rape How?
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:17 PM
9

Do you feel the same way about subs like tumblrinaction?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:06 PM
1

So the wage gap isn't caused by a masculinized professional world?
/r/MensRights02/06/17 01:14 AM
6

Bruh "medical reasons" was not the argument you brought up in the comment I responded to.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:12 AM
7

It's not even remotely the same thing. Circumcision is done for medical reasons That wasn't your argument, and wasn't what I was responding to. I really don't think using unconsensual sexual intercourse as an analogy for unconsexual sexual mutilation is all that far fetched or dramatic btw.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:57 AM
9

Would you be ok with somebody raping your infant child? They won't remember or feel the pain.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:05 AM
4

Chimps would easily win 100%. But I hate the "men sometimes literally have zero brain activity!!" trope. No. That's just straight up bullshit. Maybe you were thinking of something stupid or too abstract to articulate, or maybe you're on the verge of sleep and can't clearly remember what was just going though your mind. But you were not thinking of nothing. That would feel like literal unconsciousness.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:59 AM
1

Huh.. is that something that once you do it stays that way, or like do you have to continually stretch your skin forever or else it will revert back?
/r/MensRights09/04/17 11:33 PM
1

I understand if you don't want to, but pics?
/r/MensRights09/04/17 11:21 PM
0

Why does this shitpost have any upvotes
/r/MensRights03/04/17 01:15 AM
2

Men are oppressed because women like attractive guys... or something. Christ, this thread should be on r/cringe.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:18 PM
-2

Your mother must be so proud. EDIT: Good to know speaking against literal misogyny is looked down on in this sub. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 12:10 AM
21

Thank you. This is the type of bullshit this sub gets shit on for. "Oh no a trans person EXISTS on a MAGAZINE!! Men are oppressed!!1!" Fuck off with that shit please.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:18 PM
10

The fact that women literally push human beings out of their bodies should be clue enough that men and women have different pelvic anatomy.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 01:47 AM
1

How does not calling yourself gay spread STD's
/r/MensRights04/12/16 05:59 AM
5

totally fine with it This dude is totally fine with his tattoos. His body is not yours. Your body is not mine.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 02:01 AM
0

I'd consider a broken toe a threat.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 11:04 PM
2

Then you'd also have to include non-lethal environmental threats, including people who don't wash their hands after blowing their nose, bad drivers, sunburn, and stubbed toes.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:39 PM
2

Make sure you're not strawmanning. When most (educated) people talk about the gender gap, they're talking about societal influences that cause women and men to pursue different careers/lifestyles that result in women making less money on average than men. If you're tackling the "77 cents on the dollar" BS catchphrase, make sure to specify that you're talking about that specific myth, and not "the wage gap" as a whole.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 10:02 PM
-1

/r/shitpost
/r/MensRights11/09/16 11:33 PM
9

Having considered the matter, we have decided not to take the approach that all offences should be 'gender neutral'. Many of our laws remain gender specific because they reflect situations where men tend to be the aggressors. E.g. rape will remain an offence that only males can commit. >Define rape as something only a man can commit >Result: Only men are charged with rape, female rapists are literally not legally possible >Conclusion: Defend law that defines rape as something only men commit, be…
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:59 AM
2

/r/cringe
/r/MensRights05/09/16 07:29 PM
3

Cell phones as we know them today weren't around 20-30 years ago.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:33 AM
1

A shirt for a grown man on father's day. I think it's pretty safe to assume that it has something to do with that man being a father. Since, you know, it's a father's day shirt for adult men. And the thing about being a father is, by default, you have children. And about 50% of the time, those children are going to be girls. And, interestingly enough, it just so happens that the word "her" fits right into the word "father", creating a nice little wordplay that shows off said father's dedication …
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:50 AM
-18

It's a shirt a dad would wear with his daughter. That's what this shirt is. It's not about moms. It's not about adult women. It's about fathers (on father's day) who love their daughters. Edit: or we can deliberately misinterpret it to get angry at nothing. lol
/r/MensRights12/06/16 03:06 AM
3

I think this is a shirt marketed toward dads who have daughters.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 07:57 AM
7

Black eyes heal, glasses don't. The point is that there's an implication of violence, and it's not met with the same gut-reaction of empathy and anger that would be present if the punch-receiver is a woman. The imagery of a boy with a black eye is usually put in the context of some sort of nostalgic, boys-will-be-boys, "little rascal" tone. The only image I know of that is in a similar tone featuring a girl is this one.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:46 PM
22

Yup. If it were about "size difference" or "strength", the imagery of a nerdy guy with broken taped-together glasses (because he gets punched in the face) would have the same emotional impact as imagery of a woman with a black eye. But, as anybody who lives in reality knows, this is not the case.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:40 PM
0

Ok..? He's talking about lesbian couples.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 04:32 PM
-1

He's not advocating for it, he's saying it's a possible future. That last line seems like a little joke to me. He's talking about lesbian couples, not the entire human population at large.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 12:48 PM
1

"Discrimination".... fucking seriously?
/r/MensRights24/05/16 02:38 PM
1

I personally don't like the phrase, but would you describe this as "toxic masculinity"?
/r/MensRights04/05/16 06:56 AM
7

This dress code nonsense never makes any sense to me. Boys also have to follow a dress code and it's often even more strict than the girls.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 06:02 PM
10

/r/tumblrinaction is over there ->
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:24 PM
1

At my university there was some event going on, and I saw some signs for this. I passed a lady at a table and she gave me a free cupcake. Idk what they had free cupcakes for but I'm not complaining lol
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:43 AM
2

The first lines in Elle King's "Ex's and Oh's" (I hear it on the radio all the damn time) are particularly creepy. Well, I had me a boy, turned him into a man I showed him all the things that he didn't understand Whoa, and then I let him go So she fucked a little kid that didn't even understand what was going on and then ran away. Um.... Not even "implied" or something you have to "really think about" or be "overly sensitive" to notice, she straight up blatantly says she raped a little kid.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:38 PM
-1

How is this relevant to this sub?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 08:43 PM
2

"Men have more biology" Quote of the year.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 06:25 PM
1

Maybe they have higher rates of suicide because assholes go out of their way to deliberately make the lives of trans people worse.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 10:18 PM
3

I've got no problems with this. Now if only they could get a separate seating area for the children that are already born...
/r/MensRights20/03/16 06:51 PM
2

But they are soldiers because they are men...
/r/MensRights16/03/16 10:04 PM
1

That's just a lovely way of saying "man up" in more words. Putting a new coat of paint on a car that makes it nice to look at won't fix it's bad engine.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 08:08 AM
2

I jerk off to gay porn. What does that make me?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 01:24 AM
6

Why would you think that
/r/MensRights04/03/16 10:29 PM
16

I was pretty sure I Knew I was a boy when I was about 4 years old. This "BUT THEY'RE NOT OLD ENOUGH TO KNOW" idea is absurd. It's transphobia wrapped in a paper thin veil of "what about the children??"
/r/MensRights08/02/16 12:05 AM
-1

Isn't there another sub that low-effort spam image posts are supposed to be dumped to?
/r/MensRights30/01/16 09:46 AM
1

Roads are created specifically for cars, in which their designated purpose is to drive on. If you could please point me to the place where designated rape centers exist, in which infrastructure is constructed specifically to facilitate raping, then maybe this analogy would make sense. Comparing men raping women, to cars driving on a road, is grotesque.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 11:49 PM
0

Really? Maybe it's just the timing difference, but most of the comments seems pretty negative toward the author's attitude. But honestly her initial feelings are pretty normal. Or at least, not unusual. I mean, dads wanting a son is a pretty common trope, and the "tomboy little girl who likes baseball" is in almost every form of fiction that features a father-daughter relationship.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 10:47 PM
1

There were also women Yakuza gang members in that scene. In fact, the only Yakuza member to survive the ordeal (unscathed) was a boy. The Bride wasn't just "made sad", she was betrayed, (almost) murdered, thought she lost her child, and repeatedly raped while unconscious. I don't know what the fuck OP was trying to prove by using Kill Bill as an example.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:25 PM
3

I put up a craigslist ad to sublet my apartment cause I wanted to move out before the lease expired. I had all male roommates so I specified I needed another male to take my spot. It's not discrimination.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 04:08 AM
2

How many landlords do you know?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:56 AM
5

Please explain how being a "huge pussy" is somehow worse than having men, boys, dying by the thousands.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:25 PM
12

This sentiment actually pisses me the fuck off. I'd rather have my kid dye his hair than have him be shot and left to die on a foreign beach. Go fuck yourself if you think anything different.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:13 PM
1

I was under the impression that this type of statistic was gathered from hospital records.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:31 PM
1

More than that, remember that suffragettes wanted to take away the right of unlanded men to vote, as they were outraged that men they considered "beneath" them were allowed to vote at all. The fact that those men paid for their vote with the draft did not enter into the discussion. Can you back that up?
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:08 PM
2

"Man up" is the always visible whip hanging on the wall, occasionally cracked when you look like you might be thinking about escape.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 07:35 PM
4

/r/boysgonewild :)
/r/MensRights11/10/15 02:31 AM
9

/r/shitpost
/r/MensRights19/09/15 09:27 PM
1

The transphobia in this thread actually, legitimately disgusts me.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:06 PM
3

This is a more tumblrinaction post. It doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:44 AM
3

Sounds like he cares.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 02:09 AM
7

And I guarantee you there's men who have too, and exponentially more women who haven't "stabbed you in the back" than have done so.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:34 AM
19

I have a female friend (yes I know its not wise) ...Seriously?
/r/MensRights17/08/15 05:43 AM
8

This isn't tumblr "spreading" anywhere. "Man evil, woman victim" has been the dominant narrative since literally forever.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:27 AM
0

I don't understand why this is here.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 02:40 AM
5

Completely agree. This shit is embarrassing.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 04:07 PM
10

The repression of male sexuality. Legitimately. It's to prevent masturbation.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 02:05 AM
1

Shit like this makes me embarrassed to come here.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:12 AM
2

All I see here is the tired, "but X happens to women more, so it's a women's issue" argument that gets brought up any time somebody tries to mention that X also happens to men, whatever X may be. I understand the context is different, "it's a women's issue" being the defended societal norm, while "it's a men's issue" is demonstrably not. But endorsing the logic that creates this double standard in the first place isn't going to fix anything.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:15 PM
0

Why are you under the assumption that everything in this sub has to be something feminists disagree about?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 01:24 AM
0

Her writing is a lot more fluid and readable than that.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:40 AM
2

I don't think it's helpful, necessary, or intelligent to shift blame onto her.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:57 AM
2

"Is there anything females can do to control the ravages that male-male competition can wreak upon them? One possibility is that they might just make fewer males. Theoretically this might be managed. One can imagine a grand council of all the langur, or dragonfly, females from an area meeting and agreeing that the services that males provide could be met by a ratio of one son to every ten daughters. No doubt, continuing with this fantasy, all the females would agree that the idea had great appea…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:18 AM
7

I remember literally crying myself to sleep at night as a little kid, thinking that I was going to be sent off to war and murdered because I was a boy.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 10:59 AM
-1

Well it's kind of true. Sexual reproduction didn't just pop up out of the blue. Remove all the political motivation and whatever else sentimental baggage though.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:14 PM
1

And if you ate candy, and died, would you say you were a victim? A victim of what, then? Parental abuse for letting me make choices I wasn't prepared for and couldn't understand. If somebody lets their 8 year old drive a car because they saw nascar once and want to be a race car driver, when there's a 10 car pile up on the highway, the parents would rightly be held responsible. Kids are stupid. They can be victims of their own stupidity. They can be victims of their own stupidity enabled thanks …
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:24 AM
2

And when I was 5 years old I wanted to eat nothing but candy forever. But it's thanks to my parents' good judgement that that didn't happen and I am still alive. The point is kids may want something, but they don't understand and are ill equipped to deal with the consequences of that thing. That's why it's illegal, and the adult's responsibility to have more reasonable judgement and self control than a fucking child.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:49 PM
1

I just want to clarify and highlight this sentence: Maybe it wasn't your intention, but I often see it being used to minimize and excuse the rate of female suicide attempts, and that's quite frankly disgusting. I was talking about the usage of the phrase in the context of dismissing female suicide attempts (and yes, it does happen). Not necessarily your usage, which I specifically said might not have been your intention. Although I don't think psychiatrists refer to their patients as "cryers".. …
/r/MensRights25/04/15 04:28 AM
3

I think you misinterpreted my post, and I have no idea what you're talking about. I dislike when people dismiss the fact that records show women are more likely to attempt suicide. However, that doesn't mean I somehow believe men actually committing suicide isn't a problem any more. I came up with a possible explanation for the gap between attempts, based on the methods most commonly used between the sexes. My example is basically just saying "you can hide an attempt, but you can't hide a body".…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:45 AM
-1

I dislike the "cry for help" handwave explanation. Maybe it wasn't your intention, but I often see it being used to minimize and excuse the rate of female suicide attempts, and that's quite frankly disgusting. Now, this gap could have an actual explanation. For example, I believe suicide attempt statistics are recorded from patients who are admitted to hospitals due to an attempt. I don't really think it's all that unlikely that women who hurt themselves are more likely to be sent to a hospital …
/r/MensRights24/04/15 01:16 AM
11

Part of this, though, is tackling the reasons why men are more likely to commit crime. "50/50" isn't about (well, shouldn't be about...) stuffing more women into prison/STEM/whatever, or taking men out. It's about addressing the underlying causes for the gap in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:23 AM
17

This is gender neutral just as if the legal definition of "stealing" was "anybody with a skin tone darker than X who takes the property of somebody else without their consent" isn't racist. Technically it's not targeting black people, because white people can have a dark skin tone. And technically women aren't deliberately excluded from being perpetrators of rape, because they can use objects.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:15 AM
6

I really dislike the idea that sex work is only something that people do out of desperation, and anybody involved is a victim. I was a camwhore for a while. I made some good money. I didn't do it for the money though. It was mostly just a thrilling experience that helped both my self esteem and got me off. It was mostly just a fun thing, but if I really did it full time, I could make a living off of it. I don't do it any more but I don't really regret it.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 04:04 AM
-5

Not really. EDIT: if you really think it's feminism's or "the left"s fault for "man up" and most of the other shit wrapped up in male disposability, you should probably get your head out of the sand.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:20 AM
1

And if you can't handle it, maybe it's a good idea to not pursue cooking. The only classes I've seen trigger warnings in the syllabus, were sociology/psychology type classes. For example, I'm taking a class right now on Abnormal Psychology. It's basically about mental illness: the causal factors, historical perspectives, symptoms, diagnosis criteria, treatments, controversies, etc. (it makes reading tumblrinaction more interesting). There are some very sensitive topics, that may actually trigger…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 07:56 PM
-1

Putting trigger warnings in the syllabus is their way of saying "if you can't handle the heat, get out of the kitchen" ahead of time. I don't understand why anybody would have a problem with this. Sometimes controversial topics are discussed. If somebody can't handle that, then they are fair warned and can leave the class if they wish.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 03:38 AM
0

But environmental factors effect the development of your brain. Look up Neuroplasticity. Differences in adult brain anatomy/physiology could very well be a result of culture.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 06:21 AM
8

Her vocals actually sound on point. She doesn't exactly use autotune. Anyway, remember that video of Justin Bieber getting a water bottle thrown at his head while performing? I guess people mock him... out of respect? The Patriarchy works in mysterious ways.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 07:55 AM
3

Do yourself a favor and never get into anime.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 12:52 AM
116

The notion that only women have beauty standards is absolutely ridiculous. Anybody who seriously believes that is either delusional, or lives secluded under a rock. That includes things like weight, muscles, hair, skin, teeth, body hair, clothing, scent, genital size/shape, attitude, and behavior. We judge human beings on their physical and observable qualities. Idk why people don't think it happens to men. Especially when it's other dudes saying shit like that. It's almost as if they haven't ex…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:17 PM
0

The only time I've ever had my activity in this sub pointed out was when somebody said "It's like the MRA version of Stephen Colbert has graced us with his presence" to one of my comments. Not sure if it's a good or bad thing, but it wasn't exactly MISOGYNY!1! But OP, I cringed at your post when I read it originally. Complaining that somebody "got off the hook" when they were fired from their job is kind of ridiculous. This isn't a pussypass situation, because she suffered the consequences of he…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 03:33 AM
1

I'm well aware of "4chan lingo". Ask yourself why the use of "fag" exists like that. 4chan doesn't exist in a vacuum. But anyway, he's not saying fag in a sort of endearing way that 4chan users use to refer to each other. He's literally calling somebody a fag. His statement is, "when a million straight white male nerds get bullied, no one cares, but the minute one fag hangs himself, suddenly bullying matters". First off, bullying has always mattered. Always. Second, look into why people are bein…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 01:06 PM
1

Sure, or that if you prefer.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:26 PM
3

What? Why exactly is not calling suicide victims "fags" a problem? Why is having a problem with his homophobic and hateful (yes, hateful) language related to "white/straight/men" not having a voice in these discussions? What are you implying? Are you saying that not calling people "fags" is something white/straight men are incapable of doing..? I'm confused. This sub can be full of such hypocrites sometimes. If a woman wrote a big long rant about her place in muslim culture and how she was oppre…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:53 AM
-6

Seriously. Great job making himself look like a giant ass clown. It's like giving an empowering speech about equality and tolerance, and then putting on a KKK robe in front of the entire crowd.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:33 PM
5

White slave owners would be perceived to be unable to do "a slave's job". Sure as hell doesn't mean white slave owners were oppressed.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 09:36 PM
4

Can you guys stop misinterpreting this video? It's embarrassing.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:41 PM
1

I'm 20 and weigh about 125 lbs. You think that'd be an excuse to give me a free pass?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:39 PM
0

Exactly..? "Supporting gender roles" means that women and men don't have that choice.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 05:13 PM
-1

hey guess what, some people support traditional gender roles, and maybe that's ok too. Except it's not. Showing a preference toward masculinity or femininity is perfectly fine, of course, but that should be based on individual preference, not social pressure because of gender roles. People "supporting" traditional gender roles are an abhorrent detriment to society. It's nothing but social control. It's what this sub is fundamentally against.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:56 AM
27

I guarantee you he only took a picture because he realized the pants were painted on, and it was a bizarre novelty, not because he was a misogynistic pervert adding victims to his fap folder. But anyway, I'd say you're a little off base. Somebody coming within inches of my ass taking photographs is certainly fucking harassment.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 08:49 AM
1

Lol, you're either delusional or just can't read properly. The person who adopted the "incorrect" meaning of homophobia is the person who made the term up in the first place. Stop being a clown.
/r/PussyPass14/11/14 01:32 AM
2

If a draft is ever needed, it must be as fair as possible, and that fairness depends on having as many eligible men as possible registered. In the event of a draft, for every man who fails to register, another man would be required to take his place in service to his country. I lost my appetite.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 04:09 PM
5

For future reference, can you cite that?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 09:21 AM
1

She's mocking herself. The song is about how she can't hold on to a relationship and goes through guys too fast.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 12:19 PM
1

It has nothing to do with morality, but everything to do with the actual definition of the word. Although sexual attitudes tracing back to Ancient Greece (8th to 6th centuries BC to the end of antiquity (ca. 600 AD)) have been termed homophobia by scholars, the term itself is relatively new.[11] Coined by George Weinberg, a psychologist, in the 1960s,[12] the term homophobia is a blend of (1) the word homosexual, itself a mix of neo-classical morphemes, and (2) phobia from the Greek φόβος, Phóbo…
/r/PussyPass11/11/14 03:19 AM
1

Somebody better tell those hydrophobic phospholipid bilayer tails that they're being irrational! Because language is static, and all translations from latin root words are exact and concrete!
/r/PussyPass10/11/14 11:28 AM
0

And you've been wrong for years.
/r/PussyPass10/11/14 11:26 AM
9

That last line is great.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:56 AM
7

When I was 10, I would have enthusiastically consented to eating nothing but candy for every meal forever. Doesn't mean it's a good idea. Statutory rape laws exist not because an underage person can't want sex, but because they can't handle the consequences of sex. What happens when one of the teachers becomes pregnant? What happens when he gets an STD? A child can't be expected to deal with that. Which is why, by law, they're not. These laws are meant to protect children from themselves and the…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 09:54 PM
2

I didn't think slutwalks were about rape or anything, but rather a symbolic middle finger to the notion that women expressing sexuality is inherently immoral and wrong. It's embracing the fact that women have sexual urges too, and should not be thought less of as a person because of them. Sort of like pride parades: gay people aren't literally expressing pride in the fact that they are gay, but rather rejecting the idea that their sexuality is something to be ashamed of, in a celebratory fashion…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:30 AM
4

Not necessarily the same thing, but I'm bisexual and visit this sub from time to time. Besides maybe one or two times (and they were heavily downvoted), I have not seen anything remotely homophobic or offensive toward people of other sexual orientations whatsoever. I find this place very supportive of non-heterosexuals.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 12:58 AM
1

A little bit of a history lesson. In the United States, when public education was first becoming a thing, the "feminization" of education was seen to be imperative in order for it to work. It was based in the notion that women were morally "pure", and were better to have around young children. Teachers were supposed to be moral beacons that children looked up to and modeled their behavior after in order to become good and functioning citizens. Female teachers were deliberately sought for. The ed…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:14 AM
1

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:03 AM
2

What does that mean? Obviously it is figurative. I see "the wall" as gender roles. Some gender roles help people, some people are mildly inconvenienced, and some people are left in the wall's shadow. Getting rid of the wall allows people to act how they want to act, and not be expected to adhere to some ridiculous standard. Gender roles are the problem.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:01 AM
-2

Why give shorter people more boxes to stand on so they can see over the wall, when we could just remove the wall in the first place? People are never going to be "equal". I don't want an "equal" society. I want a society where there are differences. People are different. The ideal should be that these differences won't matter. Why try to treat the symptoms of a problem, when we should be trying to remove the source of it? There should be no "wall" to have to look over.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:29 PM
2

NSFW: http://www.omgblog.com/2007/01/omg_hes_naked_leonardo_dicapri.php#axzz3CBXuoHJ0 Playgirl tried to publish these nude photos of Leonardo DiCaprio in 1998, but his lawyers put an end to that. Now that they've leaked onto the Internet, I don't know what he was so upset about. He looked quite good naked, even if being captured with a semi is a little embarassing. See the photos after the jump. I wonder where the FBI was during this...
/r/MensRights03/09/14 01:05 AM
1

It was a joke, obviously.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:47 AM
2

Eh, I have to call bullshit on your "double standard" of how acceptable "woman porn movies" are compared to "man porn movies". I mean, how many movies are there that follow the plot line: "goofy/nerdy/average/antisocial/awkward everyday dude tries to get laid.. and in the end succeeds with his dream girl!" The mainstream entertainment industry, except for niche instances (like this novel), caters mostly to white heterosexual men. Denying this is just being unaware, or in denial.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:41 AM
1

TRP called, they want their thread back.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:43 AM
3

Statutory rape laws exist under the premise that the victim is too young to give valid consent because they are not mature enough/don't have an understanding of the consequences of nor the means to cope with the responsibilities of sex. That is literally the law. So why do people always try to justify statutory rape by saying "he gave consent"? Like.... are you fucking stupid? That's the whole fucking law in the first place.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:58 PM
1

Ugh, the comments in this thread are the ones that people are talking about when they say that /r/mensrights is hateful.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:44 AM
7

The irony in this situation is really astounding to me. What are the negative effects of these images for women? Self-esteem, insecurity, belittlement, feelings of inadequacy, etc. Right? And, when it comes to women, society is aware of these effects and has activist groups, politicians, public speakers, and a whole bunch of just regular every day people arguing against it, bringing attention to it, and ultimately trying to change it. It is a "feminist issue". Is the "objectification" a problem?…
/r/MensRights19/05/14 11:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter