TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jakery43 Archive

View 3 posts and 45 comments by jakery43 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

If two people are right for each other and choose each other freely, it could be great. The magic of your first real relationship, no baggage, kids(s) out of the house when you're 40, you'll probably meet your great grandchildren, etc But since a huge percentage of young marriages these days are just religious kids with no real life experience saying "you're good enough, let's fuck already", that skews the statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/23 10:51 PM
2

I never learn either, cheers!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/23 09:06 PM
1

In theory, yes. Real-world behavior is another story.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 12:48 PM
1

Of course most girls would would want him as a boyfriend, but they don't get to decide that by themselves. Seems like many girls would rather share Chad (whether they know it or not) than have an average guy to themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 03:56 PM
9

But you did; the tip about having your photos be consistent and help them kind of "categorize" you as a person is very helpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 04:55 PM
1

Courts only rule on the individual cases before them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 11:11 PM
1

Did you read and understand the complete opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 09:44 PM
1

Yes, the issue just didn't come up until then.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 08:12 PM
2

The court has already interpreted the constitution to imply that government doesn't have the right to stop it, in the interest of medical privacy. This isn't a state by state thing like whether your car needs a front license plate or something. Almost no one who this directly affects will be old enough to move to a state that suits them. The big issue is that the court has taken away a right implicitly gaurenteed by the constitution for the first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 07:22 PM
3

Or possibly: Women facing increased competition for men that meet their main headline requirements are more likely to overlook personal compatibility issues that may eventually lead to divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 11:54 AM
12

... Except for the fact that you need other people to agree to this. Unless your partner is your hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 02:07 PM
11

It's not a helpful solution if it's something most people would never agree to.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 01:26 PM
8

I think that was about segregation decades ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 08:18 PM
14

Right?? You can see lots of complaining in r/FDS and other female corners of the internet about how so many guys they "date" are lazy freeloaders with no career or meaningful income, and yet I don't know anyone like that.... clearly that's my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 11:25 PM
1

In order to answer your question from another perspective. But at this point, I'm realizing that's not really what this post is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 02:09 PM
1

It sounds like we're talking about two different things; attractive single men, and married men who don't have any other options. They play by very different rules. Of course married men should continue to date their only option if they want intimacy, but you seem to agree that men who have many options have enough leverage in the 'relationship' not to bother unless they want to. I think the second half of my comment was the more important part, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 12:52 PM
3

I don't think that's a fair assumption. It's more complex than that, and I don't think it's always a conscious decision. Check out my long comment I just posted on another part of this thread to see what I mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:47 PM
6

Women put out for attractive men who don't appreciate them all the time, very often as an ongoing thing. In fact, the idea that he's so attractive and has so many options that he doesn't need to bother pretending to care could be part of the fun. Do you think rock stars have to listen to how their groupies' day went before they bang? On the other hand, once a woman realizes she is no longer attracted to her man, do you think suddenly (and out of character-ly) wanting to talk about feelings all d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:39 PM
4

You didn't say it outright, but if you only focus on one way, you give that impression.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 08:05 PM
1

I'm not saying Prince didn't have character and drive, or that it's impossible for very short guys to succeed. I'm saying he's an anomaly, and that men his height -in general- don't have the same chances that tall ones do with women. Coming up with more one-in-a-million exceptions or reasons why those exceptions succeeded doesn't address this in any way. Plus he got married as a world famous 37 year old (to a 22 year old who he met when she was 16...), so that's not a great example anyway. I thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 02:02 AM
0

It's just not addressing my point. Of course established A-list celebrities do just fine. For 99.9% of short men, it's more of a problem. They don't get attention from girls in grade school, they get picked last in dodgeball, they can't find a dance partner, they're not seen as leaders or otherwise command attention, etc throughout their early life, which makes it hard to develop the confidence and charisma that a few open-minded women might see as enough of a redeeming quality. On the other sid…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 01:05 AM
0

So you're very similar in height, not meaningfully taller. Cheers to your relationship and your open mindedness, but you probably wouldn't be commenting here in the first place if you were in the vast majority of women who are with taller men. Everyone likes to pipe up when they're the exception, but it doesn't mean that most 5'2" guys have similar options to most 6'2" guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 11:40 PM
0

Unless they're shorter than the woman they like, in which case, "He's really nice and successful and treats me well but I just don't feel a spark" most of the time. Let's stop moving the goalposts, shall we? This is a hypothetical, of course; in real life she probably wouldn't give him a chance to show who he is because character and drive isn't obvious at first glance the way height is. Besides, why should short men have to be blessed with immense drive and great character just to have a chance…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 11:18 PM
2

Which women know about...because he's famous. There are millions of short men out there with incredible character and drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 10:31 PM
4

Good point, all a man needs to make up for being short is to be one of the single most famous rock stars in human history. Ladies love him! Statisticians hate him!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 09:18 PM
3

Well, that changes the rules a bit. Those men are going to marry tradcon women, which significantly limits their options, heavily tipping the scales in the single mom's favour. As a non-trad non-con guy, it would be hard to shake the feeling that I had to settle for raising some other dude's kids with a woman who might not be giving me the same trust/privileges she gave him, who don't look like me and might remember having another ("real") dad. But everyone is human and love can overcome and who…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 11:15 PM
5

Because I'm describing a general trend ("what's realistically likely to happen"), not an absolute rule. There will always be cherry-picked counterexamples. Good for them. Also because of confirmation bias. Also, it's easier to get a date that's "out of your league" than to get a spouse that is. Are those single mothers keeping those men while still saving sex for their (next?) marriage? Have those men actually proposed? If so, they're really beating the odds.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 10:22 PM
5

I think you're confusing "should" or "what she deserves" with "what's realistically likely to happen". No one is trying to punish women for being fat or being a single mom. It's just that they have much, much less leverage to make things go their way. I know you're religious, but for our purposes here, assume that there's no heavenly matchmaker and men are simply acting rationally in their own self interest. You don't get what you deserve, you get what you negotiate. And fat women and single mot…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 08:44 PM
3

I think they manufacture them in the US to avoid that tax. I think Toyotas are only like 10-15% of the market, even so.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:14 PM
2

It's the "chicken tax".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:13 PM
3

Uh, the rest of everyday life throughout history besides a single cherrypicked disaster would like a word with you...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 08:52 PM
5

My point is that you didn't seem to think there was anything more to male sexuality than that. But off the top of my head: -toys, especially butt toys and "sleeves" -not performing well, getting it up, etc -the idea that preferring women hairless below the neck is somehow infantilizing them, or that it means he wants someone even younger -being gay, depending on where you live -sexuality of trans men is often shamed by otherwise liberal people -non-monogamy/having a de facto harem of any sort/be…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 12:43 AM
0

So... male sexuality = men's right to treat women like objects (presumably against their will)? You think that's what male sexuality is? I guess I understand feminism better now. It certainly doesn't feel like that to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/16 12:21 AM
9

All paths of life have the potential to be unfulfilling to a female in the long term, even (or especially) being career-driven. Ultimately, her own fulfillment and happiness is her own responsibility. She's not being swindled into such a life; TRP is all about making your expectations clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/14 02:14 PM
6

You're making a lot of big assumptions here. If your point is that you don't approve, you've made it. Not everyone has a problem with 20 years to enjoy with their spouse to live/travel/accomplish goals and dreams. If you were a submissive wife and full-time mother for 20 years, you probably wouldn't need to validate your existence with a day job.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/14 12:59 PM
17

Their kind spirit, femininity, their ability to make sandwiches that somehow taste better than you can make yourself. I like their eagerness to please, their caring nature, unique perspectives on things, and their silly quirks. They challenge you to keep up with things like organization, hygiene, your appearance, etc. They give you social proof and some status at social occasions. All in all, women are pretty cool.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 05:02 PM
1

He means that HB9 refers to her SMV, confidence level, and beauty as viewed by society, not OP's view of her. If OP treated her like a HB6 (complementing her, fewer negs, etc), she wouldn't respond favorably since her HB9 status means she's used to compliments, catcalls, worship, etc. regardless of what OP thinks of her.
/r/seduction15/03/13 05:20 PM
1

Exactly this. Don't grovel for her attention, instead invite her to tag along with you in your interesting, fulfilling, and fun lifestyle.
/r/seduction15/03/13 05:10 PM
0

Sounds like you're in the right subreddit.
/r/seduction02/03/13 01:52 AM
3

Repost #8504957592437549357234
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:07 PM
2

Just because someone posted something on facebook doesn't make it relevant to Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:34 PM
3

It's hard to tell. I wish the article said if he did have a gun, and what his threats were. There's just too little information to know for sure.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:04 PM
8

Is it false? I don't know because I don't have a sister but I know that siblings tend to get rewarded (by getting the other party in trouble) by their parents for creating drama before dealing with the problem. Again, I have little basis for judgement, but it makes me wonder.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:29 PM
10

Why all the downvotes? This guy is right, even if none of us like that.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:53 PM
2

Saved and upvoted. Very well put. Indroducing new (to me) ideas on this topic is awesome... sometimes there is no TL;DR
/r/MensRights10/04/12 11:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter