TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jaketheripper Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by jaketheripper on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Kissing someone on the back of the neck is innocent? Really?
/r/MensRights16/12/13 05:51 PM
1

Hanging yourself can lead to decapitation, it doesn't take much at all in the way of a 'contraption'. There are plenty of stories about people starting to hang themselves and clawing at the rope while dying, I can imagine a scenario where someone decides to play it extra safe, binds themselves, and jumps from a more than necessary height causing decapitation.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 02:13 PM
4

But it would also cover an ass grab, I'm all for ass grabs being illegal, but I'm not really sure it's rape...
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:51 PM
12

More severe than just autism, 1 in 100 children born to mothers at age 40 have Down syndrome, 12 times more likely than at 25. The plumbing still works, Sometimes: At age 30 75% will have a conception ending in a live birth within one year 91% will have a conception ending in a live birth within four years. At age 35 66% will have a conception ending in a live birth within one year 84% will have a conception ending in a live birth within four years. At age 40 44% will have a conception ending in…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 05:19 PM
4

They didn't go through any agency, as the article states: The CSA said that if Mr Langridge had used an official sperm donation centre he would not have to pay child support – but informal arrangements are not covered by the law. Mr Langridge argues that the rules should be changed. and He was not named on the birth certificates of the two children, and played no role in their upbringing Either his DNA was somehow on file and she had to submit her children's DNA as part of the application (which…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:57 PM
9

Anger and violence is like that, an episode of Bullshit (Penn and Tellers show) quoted some source that said anger management "strategies" that involved hitting something or yelling into a pillow didn't help relieve frustration at all, and over time it reinforced the idea that frustration needed to be vented physically.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 11:34 PM
-1

The FBI definition is: “Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” It doesn't state anywhere that the victim is the one being penetrated, if you have a source that says this, by all means, provide it.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 10:32 PM
7

18 link karma -213 comment karma Ahh, you're a troll, for a second there it was a little suspicious. Even so, I'll debunk your argument in the most logical way possible. Table 9. Number and Percent Convicted on UCR Offenses by Race of Defendant || Crime || African American Males || White Males || || Homicide || 51.1 || 55.6 || || Rape || 75.9 || 73.1 || || Robbery || 73.7 || 80.0 || || Aggravated Assault || 78.2 || 87.5 || || Burglary || 75 || 69.7 || || Larceny* || 58.8 || 60.9 || || Vehicle Th…
/r/MensRights21/05/11 03:11 PM
0

If I had my way, admissions would not be allowed access to the name, race, or gender of people when making selections. Admissions would be based on merit only. I understand this position and agree on some levels, and certainly used to agree whole-heartedly, but recently I've started thinking about it slightly differently: I certainly wouldn't base it on name race or gender, but I would base it partially on income. I understand fully that this isn't fair to the wealthy that scored highly, but I s…
/r/MensRights29/11/10 01:46 AM
3

The comment "I had to earn my way into college." implies that others did not, in fact, it casts doubt on everyone that isn't like you. It implies that every single person that isn't a white male possibly (or even probably) doesn't deserve to be there. Blaming affirmative action is horse shit: A 2005 study by Princeton sociologists Thomas J. Espenshade and Chang Y. Chung compared the effects of affirmative action on racial and special groups at three highly selective private research universities…
/r/MensRights29/11/10 01:00 AM
7

I had to earn my way into college. Fuck yourself for implying that everyone that isn't a white male got handed college. -A white male
/r/MensRights28/11/10 08:16 PM
6

But... if men choose that stance and we get it... won't we be in the exact same boat but with women getting the short end of the stick again?
/r/MensRights28/11/10 08:12 PM
2

At this point I honestly wouldn't care if he was mine or not, he was a week late and I don't think she had the time or inclination to cheat on me, it's never been a concern for me. I've been doing my own reading and it seems like the best thing I can do right now is get a lawyer and get official joint custody, right now she most likely has sole de facto custody as we've never lived together and (as far as I know) nothing has ever happened in front of a judge.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 04:40 PM
1

Thanks for the advice, most everything I have communication-wise is in text messages, I haven't kept much of a record for times she's been late other then texts asking about him, but I guess I'll start a spreadsheet or something documenting dates and times.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 04:09 PM
1

I appreciate the resources and the advice, I have been keeping some records but I plan on being more meticulous in the future, I guess it really would be my only defense if she wanted to claim I haven't been doing the things I have.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 04:08 PM
3

Do you feel amicable? It depends on the day, when she wants something or something works out better for her, everything is golden. There have been one or two cases that I've needed an extra hour and I've gotten hell for it.
/r/MensRights20/10/10 02:02 PM
6

And I've known girls that get their period until they're 15, quick developers and slow developers exist, laws shouldn't be tailored to fit either group.
/r/MensRights28/08/10 06:47 PM
-5

It's different because while it might be completely reasonable that some relationships with a 30+ year old and a under 20 year old is an actual consensual relationship a large number of them are going to involve the younger person getting taken advantage of. I have no statistics on it, and I'd certainly agree that a 16 year old and a 19 year old shouldn't be illegal, but a 15 year old and a 30 year old really should be, 15 year olds aren't nearly as mature as they think they are. And a 15 year o…
/r/MensRights28/08/10 05:41 PM
-14

NAMBLA, NAMBLA, NAMBLA!
/r/MensRights28/08/10 03:41 PM
1

The fact that most women still go for marriage and partnership proves that the old system wasn't as distasteful as you're implying. You clearly don't understand how much marriage has changed... Modern marriage combines the partners assets, to be split at the time of a separation. In old times, marriage was simply a passing of belongings from the female to the male, should the male decide to leave, he took his belongings. Women were used far more in political marriages than males and had far less…
/r/MensRights02/08/10 03:23 PM
16

Terrible point, there were some major catalysts to get women to where they are now (world wars largely) and I'd argue that things didn't just jump on the rails as soon as feminism took roots, things have slowly been getting better for them for a while. Saying something like "it only took 100 years, it couldn't have been that bad" is like saying slavery couldn't have been that bad because it only took 4 years of civil war to stop.
/r/MensRights23/07/10 01:16 AM
0

I guess maybe I'm just not very well informed, but I can't think of a single rapists name, besides the famous obviously guilty serial type killers. False reporting is sick, but I think the whole stigma thing is a little overplayed.
/r/MensRights19/07/10 11:33 PM
1

I realize, that's why it's in quotes, it's still a useful term to describe the over the top "womyn" type feminists.
/r/MensRights10/07/10 03:22 PM
1

"Bra-burning" feminists give actual feminists a bad name is an unfamiliar idea? It's the only narrative I've ever heard on the subject.
/r/MensRights10/07/10 01:02 AM
1

I disagree entirely, I see several advantages of circumcision. It's certainly possible that if I wasn't circumcised I would see it differently, but I feel there is enough evidence in favor of it that it can reasonably be said my opinion is based in logic.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 08:06 PM
4

It's the truth, if everyone took this to heart, were taught early on that getting abused isn't right and taking it makes you are a dumbass, a lot fewer people would take it and a lot fewer people would be impacted by it.
/r/MensRights25/05/10 06:57 PM
0

You know what percent of men should have full custody? None. Keyword "should", in an ideal world, both parents would have an equal say in the raising of the child. She is stating that she is assuming an ideal world exists by using should and thus doesn't need to be patronized, clearly she lives on the same planet everyone on Reddit does, asking her to clarify is asinine.
/r/MensRights25/05/10 06:53 PM
1

The flip side to that is I'm glad I was circumcised, I'd want to be but there's no way in hell I'd do it once everything was developed. I'm thankful my parents did it when I was too young to realize what was happening.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 08:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter