| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manspreading complaint is couched as a response to “rudeness” by men, but it is no such thing: it is pathetic feminist pipsqueakery, the last dying gasp of a movement. A survey last year revealed thatAs a daily NYC subway rider, I can tell you that a much greater problem is caused by many women's enormous backsides. Not joking here. Women's bottoms spread as they age, and women tend to carry their weight on their hips. Too many women are either obese or simply too snack-enhanced to sit comfortably among civilized people. It is incredibly depressing to have the seat beside you vacated only to notice a cow, a veritable house, coming in for a landing. Perhaps the MTA will post seat measurements… | /r/MensRights | 23/12/14 01:15 AM |
| 2 | The lonesome death of Eric Garner - 'When men are treated like pieces of meat by cops and medics, trust erodes'It should not be forgotten that this man died because NYC bureaucrats needed to collect a regressive cigarette tax. I'm not a Rand Paul fan, but this will explain some of the issues: http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/03/politics/rand-paul-eric-garner-taxes/index.html | /r/MensRights | 05/12/14 04:52 AM |
| 7 | Atlanta school joins the anti-male movement with new "unisex" restrooms: A Discussion.James, I think that you're not really getting the point here. Yes, you or one of your friends will eventually come to be regarded as a creepy cis hetero male victimizer. And that's not a bug, that's a feature. That is, at the end of the day, the WHOLE POINT of this exercise. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/14 04:42 AM |
| -1 | Huge NYT article on Hobart&WilliamSmith rape tribunal. The usual modus operandi -- No statistics, just McCaskillesque emotion-manipulating story of female victim horrendously treated by school admHow excruciatingly odd it is to hear the NY Times constantly refer to the defendants as "football players," "Player #1", "Player #2," etc. They are almost never called 'students,' 'defendants,' 'young men,' or 'the accused' at all. Using terminology like 'player #1' and 'player #2' is how I might describe a football play, and that seems to be what the NY Times is pretending to describe. Rape is a football play. But no footballs appear in the story at all. Nor any football plays. Hm. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/14 03:17 PM |
| 22 | Woman who gave oral sex to 5 y/o not a pedophileTo my way of thinking, no one could support the veracity of this pedophilia test. Tests which measure different things in men and women ... measure different things. How to get around that? What's more, Dr Gray's claim that Crossfield, not being attracted to children, would be unlikely to re-abuse in the future, seems to disregard the fact that her recent pedophilic behavior was not even based on attraction. Why, when her behavior was not based on attraction, would we use 'lack of attraction' to… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 05:21 AM |
| 0 | "Social Justice" is an Assault on JusticeSocial Justice is Marxist Catholicism forcibly administered by the state. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/13 02:08 AM |
| 4 | Gender is not, contrary to feminist doctrine, a social construct.'Gender is socially determined, but sexual orientation you're born with,' is the orthodoxy nowadays.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFKmzR5Aejg | /r/MensRights | 23/09/13 01:13 AM |
| 1 | Yale's sex policy illustrates the problemPerhaps some of you are are not yet familiar with the 'Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.' They bring civil rights lawsuits against universities for just these kinds of sexist abuses. I believe that they have not yet lost a case. Currently they're involved in the "blueprint for sexual harassment prosecution" that has been foisted on the U. of Montana by the Education Department's Office of Civil Rights. The OCR is the enforcer of most colleges' institutionalized misandry. At any rate… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/13 02:59 AM |
| 0 | 'The War On Marriage' at Investors Business DailyAny clarification on that? | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 05:04 PM |
| 1 | NY Times article suggests men who are masculine and those that play sports are inherently prone to rapeRupert Murdock does not own the NY Times, silly. Do some homework. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/13 03:29 AM |
| 1 | Literature for boys, young men, and men?Also, don't forget the Patrick O'brian series, including 'Master and Commander,' and Lewis's 'Horatio Hornblower' books. These are wonderful. Several years ago a work acquaintance asked me just your question, and I brought in a few of the O'brian books. When I next saw her she said both her husband and her son were devouring the whole series! Also, J.Henri Fabre's books on insects are great literature. He seems incapable of writing a boring sentence, and is especially accessible to young folks. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/13 08:15 PM |
| 1 | Literature for boys, young men, and men?'Sink the Bismark,' by CS forester, was a big treat when I was a kid. 'Wind, Sand, and Stars,' was another great. It's by Antoine De St. Exupery, the great French writer and aviator. Anything about Shackleton is sure to amaze. Older boys should be handed the novels of Raymond Chandler or even Doctorow's 'Billy Bathgate.' The Celestial Omnibus,' and 'The Snows of Kilimanjaro and other Stories,' might be enjoyed by teens. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/13 05:48 PM |
| 3 | Definition of rape in OS X's (10.8.3) DictionaryRegarding ungendered appellations like 'firefighter,' 'police officer,' and 'soldier,' Angry Harry notes that these terms are often used by the media to subvert and deny any acknowledgement of traditional men's heroism. "Three hundred forty-three firefighters lost their lives on 9/11." Each one was a man. There were no women. That fact is suppressed, even on Wikipedia. This is utterly typical. Try identifying the gender of the firefighters who recently died in America's forest fires by reading a… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/13 02:11 AM |
| 5 | Mens Rights is constantly accused of being for the hatred of women, and it even says it on the Wikipedia page. Is this a lie?Wikipedia's useful, but it is still something of a 'political document' maintained, updated, and edited by the white american cultural elite. Entries often suffer from the very prejudices and ideologies found in US liberal arts colleges. This is especially obvious if you look up a contentious topic, something with political import, or something you actually know about. It's amazing to see how some truths are short-shrifted, omitted entirely, or bent to 'politically desirable' ends. Oh well. The … | /r/MensRights | 08/08/13 02:29 AM |
| 2 | Read Taranto Regularly: women cry at work, and your government is on it.Did you read the article? Did you miss the commentary and analysis provided by the Government and WSJ? | /r/MensRights | 07/08/13 04:27 AM |
| 2 | My narrow minded opinion on men's rights. I'm ignorant to the topic. Care to explain?Actually, it's an 8 part presentation by Farrell at The Cato Institute entitled, "Why Men Earn More." See Youtube. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/13 04:09 AM |
| 3 | So there's some buzz about Elizabeth Warren running for 2016 Dem. pres. What does /r/mensrights think about her?She is a liar and an abuser of Affirmative Action, a fraudulent 'diversity hire' of at least two institutions, and a progressive populist. If she stays in Mass. she might hope to carry on with the integrity of the fraud she replaces. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/13 03:22 AM |
| 1 | My narrow minded opinion on men's rights. I'm ignorant to the topic. Care to explain?To give yourself a broad overview of some of the topics that the Men's Rights movement concerns itself with, and some of the rationale behind MRA thinking, you might pursue a two-pronged strategy. First, look at the Amazon reviews of the salient MRA books, texts and authors that are referred to again and again. You won't need to actually read the books to simply get a gist of the thinking. Amazon reviews are quite informative. Second, look at as many Youtube videos as you like. I'm sure other po… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/13 03:03 AM |
| 1 | Read Taranto Regularly: women cry at work, and your government is on it.Our Labor Department has a Woman's Bureau, no Men's Bureau. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/13 02:14 AM |
| 1 | If a woman gets pregnant and wants the baby, but the husband doesn't, what happens?Forget the rape equivalence. That's nonsense. But the first part of your post is interesting, and I've heard it often. 'Having a baby....responsibility of both parents,' is exactly the argument made by pro-lifers. Do you intend for this viewpoint to be treated as valid when applied to men's reproductive rights but invalid when applied to women's reproductive rights? In short, do you realize you are making an anti-abortion argument? | /r/MensRights | 23/07/13 06:39 PM |
| 2 | Irony: feminist article about historical witch-hunting says female sexuality was demonized for a power takeover. So why do feminists demonize male sexuality?To put into perspective, in the US, the number of people executed for witchcraft is less than the number of people killed by US Postal workers 'Going Postal,' and less than the number of people shot in Chicago this past July 4th weekend. ALL of the people tried in Salem were accused of witchcraft by women and girls, and tried on evidence given by those same women and girls. In Midieval Europe same thing: typical accusers were overwhelmingly other women. In fact, people are still practicing and b… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/13 07:27 PM |
| 1 | Divorced moms preventing father's contact with their kids: and interesting article from an interesting site, by another great female friend of MRA'S.It's not really at all a blog you should care about, kind of just a far-flung, somewhat noted take on French culture. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/13 12:47 PM |
| 2 | Thanks, Village Inn! I had no idea my worth was correlated with my wealth and comparable to food and drink, but now I do! Glad we got that all cleared up!A: Well, now you know. You're worth (to women, in this case) is correlated with your wealth. B: Never get pissy when someone tells you the truth. C: It'd be fine if this were displayed in all classrooms. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/13 05:03 AM |
| 2 | Fight itI'm in the US, and perhaps it's different, but the rule of thumb is this: always get a lawyer immediately. Don't even talk to the police, ever, alone. Make them deal with a pro. It will cost you, but it might save you a world of trouble. I don't hate cops, but they do not represent my interests. Never, ever, answer a question from a cop without a lawyer present. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/13 01:18 AM |
| 2 | Men won't be held to rigid gender roles. They'll be allowed to express a full range of emotions!First, how many women have you ever met that understand men, as men? Second, do you like being a man? Then why would you treat respectfully any prescriptions from women on what needs to be adjusted? The scary thing is that these people want to educate our children. http://www.amazon.com/WAR-AGAINST-BOYS-Misguided-Feminism/dp/0684849577/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1373757996&sr=1-1&keywords=the+war+on+boys | /r/MensRights | 13/07/13 11:28 PM |
| 6 | Woman Gets Life Sentence for letting a 13 year old touch her breasts.I think the previous commenter hit the nail on the head in suggesting that the mandatory sentences were intended for men, not women. Though it's all disgusting, I wonder how many men have been similarly abused. A lot, I would guess. Readers should know that a significant supporter of mandatory sentencing, three strike rules, etc., is the prison system itself. Corrections unions in California, for example, are enormous and well paid, and were responsible for getting sentencing guidelines passed. … | /r/MensRights | 13/07/13 10:52 PM |
| 1 | ‘Troubling’ posters that parody successful ‘Don’t Be That Guy’ anti-rape campaign appear in EdmontonYou guys are all missing the point. The original, 'Don't be that guy,' posters were not for raising awareness or even addressing the criminal brutality experienced by some women. They were political. In fact, they were a return to and reanimation of the central project of 2nd wave feminism: the criminalization of heterosexual masculinity and the marginalization of men. 'Don't be that guy,' suggests that you ARE that guy, forever on the verge of yet another brutalization. It's in you. It's just t… | /r/MensRights | 11/07/13 04:59 PM |
| 3 | I have an Idea for an indie game: Finally give women all the 'catharsis' they want - by letting them kill men over and over in a male murder sim.You call it a video game, I call it a Jodie Foster movie. Ever notice that almost every one of her films is based on her killing men? | /r/MensRights | 02/07/13 02:21 AM |
| 1 | My University Club adviser warned us against holding Pro Men's Right viewsI think it's best to always try to make friends, and possibly allies, before you have to make enemies. You can do this by 'offering up ideas for consideration,' rather than judgements that must be accepted or rejected. This seems especially true if your audience isn't quite familiar with the topic. You can strenthen your arguments gradually as the discussion proceeds, if you like. Reasonableness is key. I think it would be a bad plan to try to 'win' acceptance, first time out, for what is still,… | /r/MensRights | 14/02/13 08:56 AM |
| 1 | Do all women really feel this way?The main thrust of feminism over the past forty years has been the diffusion and redistribution of guilt from the criminally brutal rapist to heterosexual masculinity at large: we are all supposed to be guilty. Early second wave feminists were quite theoretical about this and they left a large written record of their attempts to equate being male with being a rapist. Susan Brownmiller, Mary Koss, Ti-Grace Atkinson, K. McKinnon, etc., all tried this shamelessly, and it's what makes their writing … | /r/MensRights | 24/01/13 09:03 AM |
| 17 | Major Human Rights Violation Rectified: Denmark Requires Haircuts For Men And Women To Be The Same Price.Actually, this ruling simply forces men to subsidize women's hair cuts. The regulation does not say that the services provided must be equal, just that the prices must be equal. There is no reason to believe that anyone- women or anyone else- views this as a standardization of service. Men's prices will have to rise. Women's will fall, but the differential in care, attention, and time will remain in women's 'favor.' | /r/MensRights | 24/01/13 08:06 AM |
| 4 | Thoughts on this article from the NYU website.I read the NYU website and followed the link to its supporting Justice Department study (NCVS). The authors of that study claim to have discovered 86 rapes among the approximately 4500 women they questioned. Their method extrapolated from there to the American female college population at large. More than half of those 86 women, though, verbally declined to characterize what had occurred to them as rape. The authors went ahead and characterized it as rape anyway, and extrapolated based on the hi… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/13 10:25 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter