~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Vicks directs flippant disdain toward Men's Health in their latest Australian ad campaign."Nigga" is derogatory. "Men" is factual. Not equivalent. That significant difference warrants different consideration. I see your point though, some other guy was struggling to (I think) make the same one, or at least similar. I'd agree that these are the same: a) "You lazy black people, you can't do anything" b) "You lazy men, you can't do anything" | /r/MensRights | 22/07/14 12:39 AM |
| 1 | Vicks directs flippant disdain toward Men's Health in their latest Australian ad campaign.Me saying "c'mon mate" was an attempt to be friendly with you despite our disagreement. Don't use it to try to make further ridiculous arguments, try actually responding the content of mine instead of changing course and starting a tangential one. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/14 03:02 PM |
| -6 | Vicks directs flippant disdain toward Men's Health in their latest Australian ad campaign.No, the first one is offensive because of its pejorative intent, it's meant to insult a black person by invoking the old value system of slavery in which black people where considered less than white people, subhuman. The second is not offensive because its intent is amusement, even endearment, but not insult or malice. C'mon mate, saying that in times of sickness men like to eat pizza and play games is not comparable to saying that a black person is less than human. Worlds apart. Galaxies apart… | /r/MensRights | 21/07/14 02:35 PM |
| -2 | Vicks directs flippant disdain toward Men's Health in their latest Australian ad campaign.So by your logic, these two are exactly equivalent? a) "You pathetic nigga, piece of garbage." b) "Hey Mike, nice hair cut. Did you run into a lawnmower?" One is ridiculing a black person, the other ridiculing a man, as you say. Are you telling me that you're equally outraged at both, or equally indifferent to both? | /r/MensRights | 21/07/14 02:16 PM |
| -7 | Vicks directs flippant disdain toward Men's Health in their latest Australian ad campaign.Stupid. You're passively-aggressively arguing that a joke about men behaving like young boys shouldn't be accepted as humour because it's unacceptable to call black people niggas and pass it off as humour? Logical Fallacy of False or Faulty Analogy. That's like saying "I think think it's hilarious to push strangers over from behind, but I'm not allowed to do it so you can't have knock-knock jokes. Knock-knock jokes should be banned." Ludicrous. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/14 01:34 PM |
| -2 | Vicks directs flippant disdain toward Men's Health in their latest Australian ad campaign.Could we please not turn ourselves into a bunch of screeching inverse-feminists? To call this "flippant disdain towards mens' health" is ridiculous. Let's not be too quick to trade in our senses of humour. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/14 09:34 AM |
| 6 | Saw this on Facebook today. Focus on the real issue.Agree. I think this is a terrible infographic. At a quick glace it looks like MEN RAPE PEOPLE. Not helping. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/14 08:01 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter