TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jaunty_jawa Archive

View 0 posts and 45 comments by jaunty_jawa on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

There was an IAMA about a guy in Brazil(? I think) whose father was suing him for support. Almost the exact same situation. I think the father may have won, too. I'll have to go look...yep, he did. Here's the link
/r/MensRights30/07/10 01:44 AM
3

Why are you paying child support if you have joint custody? It sounds like his daughter might live at his ex's house more often, hence the child support (to pay for meals, etc). If you're subsidizing her because she can't or won't find a job that will put food on the table while your daughter is with her, then you've turned your ex into a glorified nanny Where did you get this out of his post? It could be he has a higher education level and thus a better job, or is in a higher paying career. Or,…
/r/MensRights19/05/10 04:10 AM
3

56 percent is not a huge majority. Kids are safer with both (or all) parents because there is mutual supervision going on. It's a safety net on all sides.
/r/MensRights09/05/10 06:10 AM
3

I agree, except: That is misandry, not misogyny. It's neither. Like you said: It's freedom of expression vs gender role expectations.
/r/MensRights21/04/10 08:38 PM
1

Wow. Condescending tone aside, I wasn't attempting to "win" an argument. I'll admit this topic is somewhat of a sore-spot for me, so I may be trying too hard to make myself understood. That's all.
/r/MensRights19/04/10 10:01 PM
0

Is it really picking a side, or is it just a numbers game? For instance, if you're a bisexual woman, equally attracted to both men and women (and this is different for many bisexual people), the likelihood of being attracted to a man who is also attracted to you is much higher than being attracted to a woman who is also attracted to you (and will act on it). There are more straight men in the world than there are lesbians/bisexual women who aren't closeted. That being said, a lot of bisexual peo…
/r/MensRights19/04/10 02:16 AM
0

I'm not so sure. I, for one, am living with my significant other and for all intents and purposes (other than taxes), we're married. If we went on being unmarried like this forever, I'd be perfectly content. (Before anyone goes on about common law marriage, etc, I'm the one getting the degree and have more wage-earning power and no debt, so I don't think he's got much to worry about...besides the fact that I don't want his money). Now, if either of us gets a job with great benefits like health i…
/r/MensRights18/04/10 04:25 AM
2

I'm saying it could be. I'm saying that there's no way of testing this hypothesis and that the situation in which you've talked to women about relationships isn't the best situation in which to get good data from anyone. :)
/r/MensRights18/04/10 04:13 AM
1

Eh, it's seems to be an increasing trend to question marriage. I know you'll probably hate to hear this or disagree, but most people I've talked to who identify as feminists question marriage wholeheartedly. Really, anyone who questions tradition for tradition's sake questions marriage. It might be generational (I'm 22). My friends in general (both men and women) say they'll get married if they feel they've found someone that just makes them feel the need, but marriage isn't part of their "life …
/r/MensRights18/04/10 04:12 AM
2

Eh, that might just mean that divorce is less socially accepted, not that marriage/divorce isn't screwed up.
/r/MensRights18/04/10 04:04 AM
1

I honestly haven't seen much of that kind of argument. But either way, I've found that most women also question marriage, for different reason, but they do question it. A lot. It might be that men hear a lot of "she'll stop having sex with you, etc" things about marriage from a young age and so question marriage as a whole earlier than women, while women seriously question marriage with the individual they might be considering. This is all a major guess, but it seems to be true in my experience …
/r/MensRights18/04/10 04:00 AM
0

Now you know two. Honestly, do you think that the "shoulder to cry on" situation is the best situation to glean this kind of information about "most" women from? That is a situation in which they are already feeling hurt, obviously, and most people when they are hurt take a "me against the world" stance, especially if it was the other person in the relationship who hurt them. Why would you expect someone who's been hurt by their significant other to be talking about it's "us against the world"? …
/r/MensRights18/04/10 03:53 AM
0

Actually, some "solutions" to the same-sex marriage debate are spawning this type of thing. Check out the PACS in France. It's an interesting development.
/r/MensRights18/04/10 03:45 AM
-1

I see. Seems she's still bisexual, she just wants to be able to have sex with a dude who knows what he's doing. Doesn't mean she's not attracted to girls. Anyway, thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights18/04/10 02:50 AM
2

I dated a bisexual, animal rights activist, feminist. She was non of those after a year with me. but she loved bacon and penis by the end. I couldn't resist...How does loving penis make her not bisexual?
/r/MensRights17/04/10 10:42 PM
1

Ah, I didn't know this. Thanks for clarifying.
/r/MensRights15/04/10 01:51 AM
13

In fact, what happens the first time an emergency happens and the leaders have to split up? I don't know much about girl scout rules, but I'm sure in the case of emergency, it would be fine. I'm not saying that forcing men to have a female co-leader because of presumption of guilt is fine; I'm saying that part of the point of both girl scouts and boy scouts is to have a positive same-sex role model.
/r/MensRights13/04/10 12:47 AM
14

As a woman, I agree. As long as if a woman is allowed to be a scoutmaster, she *must** have a male co-leader as well, I think it's fine.* The idea is to have a same-sex role model for the kids. Both boy scouts and girl scouts have been gendered spaces since their inception.
/r/MensRights13/04/10 12:18 AM
3

whoosh
/r/MensRights05/04/10 11:53 PM
6

Nope, just sexuality period. It doesn't exist for the wackos who think porn is evil.
/r/MensRights04/04/10 04:34 AM
2

I wasn't talking about the psychological issues; I was more speculating about physical healing, though I think you have a valid point to a certain extent. For the record, I don't think the choice of being circumcised is evil at all; choosing for someone else, is, however. Exactly.
/r/MensRights01/04/10 10:07 PM
2

I wonder if there is a difference between men who were circumcised later in life and those circumcised at birth. I know nothing about how the healing capabilities of the body change, but I wonder if the penis heals better/quicker for babies. In any case, there's a much longer period of time before any sexual activity occurs after the circumcision for babies than adults. (Note before people go nuts saying, "it doesn't matter it's all evil! blaaarg!" I do not think babies should be circumised. It'…
/r/MensRights01/04/10 03:12 AM
3

Survey classes are like this all over the world. It has nothing to do with "feminization" of education and everything to do with people in general being lazy, feeling "entitled" to a degree, and rampant anti-intellectualism.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 11:53 PM
0

How is it that you get to choose one obviously nutty woman, call her a feminist and blame her insane actions on feminism? I'm not arguing that the child support system is messed up, but it's not all the "evil feminists" that have done that. Stereotypes about both men AND women have royally screwed that one. The stereotype that men are deadbeat dads and that women can't take care of themselves and need support of a man have BOTH created that craziness. This woman's actions are not indicative of f…
/r/MensRights28/03/10 01:48 PM
3

Nothing. In fact, it is the more obvious choice. I just wanted to mention that "women are superior" is not a feminist view for the majority (read: non-extremist) feminists. Nazi comparisons are undue.
/r/MensRights28/03/10 01:41 PM
3

You're thinking of what both the media and some ridiculous extremists have attempted to turn feminism into. My mother was a second-wave feminist in the 70s and she rants on and on about what the media labels as "feminism" now. Feminism was never supposed to be about "female superiority" it was about a level playing field for everyone. Obviously, some people have warped that, but equality was and is for most feminists what feminism is about. It's like any group- the extremists get the most face-t…
/r/MensRights28/03/10 03:43 AM
4

Yeah, that was the primary what the fuck moment when I was reading as well. But I've gotta say.... as they so frequently like to do Who the hell have you been dating/hanging out with? I think I've met one woman in my entire life who would do that, and you've had this happen *multiple** times*?
/r/MensRights28/03/10 03:39 AM
1

How is this excuse feminist? Seriously. Feminists don't want to be able to legally have sex with teenage boys. Pretty sure it's not on their agenda. You need to step out into the world outside /r/mensrights for a bit.
/r/MensRights28/03/10 03:26 AM
2

I'm not saying the man doesn't often get screwed; I'm saying that the assumption that women divorce their husbands primarily because of the opportunity for financial gain is mistaken and often the default assumption.
/r/MensRights27/03/10 09:40 PM
6

Jumping in to (sort of) play devil's advocate here, but why is it assumed that women file for divorce more often than men because of monetary benefits? It's just as likely that women are unhappy staying in their marriages, and thus they file for divorce. Granted, there are vindictive parties in many divorces, but to say this always or even most often stems from financial gain motivation is a huge generalization from some rough divorces.
/r/MensRights27/03/10 03:30 AM
-2

I love that this includes a diatribe against single-parent families (targeted at single-parent households where the parent is a woman, no less). Classy. Single-parent homes are no less suitable whether it is a man or a woman. Among other things, this article just rants about topics that have been talked about in much more civilized, mature ways. Please link to the multitudes of articles that do this instead of this one.
/r/MensRights26/03/10 10:13 PM
1

Or you could talk have a loving, committed relationship without getting married. Crazy idea, I know.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 04:42 AM
1

The boomers are from the 50s. The Boomer generation starts with those born at the end of WWII and ends around 1964.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 04:39 AM
1

Yep, I'd do that, too. I was raised to be polite to everyone, and getting/holding doors is simply a matter of politeness. It might be that I grew up in places where traditional "chivalry" was never as big as it was/is in the South.
/r/MensRights04/03/10 03:57 AM
3

You're right; I should rephrase that to say "plenty of women exist who have high sex drives." I've had discussions with men about sex who seem genuinely surprised when I say that I've had problems with mismatched sex drives in heterosexual relationships where mine was the higher one. There seems to be a connection between high female sex drives and "slut/whore" qualities in both men's and women's minds. Just like men who don't live up to the "want sex all the time" stereotype are seen as less ma…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 03:44 AM
3

I hold the door for anyone coming in right after me, anyone carrying a bunch of stuff, anyone who has difficulty opening doors....hell, just anyone regardless of gender, age, etc. No one seems to be surprised when I do this, it's a natural, almost unconscious thing that I do, and I'm a young woman. This isn't normal?
/r/MensRights02/03/10 03:34 AM
10

Probably for the same reason there are a lot of men out there that are still surprised to learn that women exist who have high sex drives. Misconceptions are all over the place. Many of us are still raised on gender stereotypes of men or women, blatant or subtle.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 03:22 AM
7

I think it stems from old "chivalry" values. That women are so delicate that they should never have to sleep anywhere but a big fluffy bed. That aside, no couple should go to bed angry. That's one of the major rules in my relationships. It gets worked out before bed, or we at least agree to work it out in the morning. We never sleep apart out of anger. And I'll admit, I've actually tried to sleep on the couch because I was pissed and let it get the better of me, and my boyfriend has been the one…
/r/MensRights22/02/10 06:04 AM
2

I, too, agree that this blogger is anti-porn for reasons that just don't seem to be true, what does this have to do with men's rights? I'm might just be missing something, but it doesn't seem like the blogger is outright blaming men for the "evils of porn" or anything similar.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 01:29 AM
2

I've actually heard quite a bit about this while living in Utah, especially from mothers of teenage boys who were kicked out of the compounds or who were brought out of the compound with their mother(s).
/r/MensRights08/02/10 07:26 AM
0

Yes, but it's rarer than you seem to think. Not one of the female friends I have had (and with whom I have had conversations about sex) have been able to have an orgasm without clitoral stimulation. In any case, it would be interesting to see the results of a good poll/survey of women showing what % have had orgasms without clitoral stimulation. It is also important to note that no clitoral stimulation is very different from indirect clitoral stimulation, meaning stimulation of the clitoris by t…
/r/MensRights04/02/10 05:27 AM
0

I couldn't. Guess your 100% is wrong. Just because the practice is done doesn't mean women can have an orgasm with a clitoris. Don't really understand your logic here...
/r/MensRights04/02/10 04:38 AM
5

I don't know why you got downvoted; the feds can't house men and women in the same facilities for obvious reasons. Can you imagine a man who'd been abused by his mother/girlfriend/wife/sister in a building with a bunch of women or a women who'd been abused by her father/boyfriend/husband/brother in a building with a bunch of men? Talk about triggering.
/r/MensRights02/02/10 05:27 AM
1

Which is why I said "the idea seems to be." I don't think it works either.
/r/MensRights28/01/10 04:47 AM
2

The idea seems to be that the 98% of men would never commit rape will peer pressure the 2% into not doing it.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 04:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter