TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jay10033 Archive

View 1 posts and 4,159 comments by jay10033 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
52

Debatejay10033/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 01:50 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,159 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

You shouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 12:26 PM
1

Women have been programmed to believe that men think sex is everything, so they wield it as a weapon in their favor when they want, using it to shame, criticize, even calling straight men gay when they don't get what they want. Watch what happens when a man rejects a woman sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:06 PM
2

You also know most women won’t accept the bare minimum of just being able to make half of rent. They in fact call that a "roommate".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 09:34 PM
3

Anecdotally I’ve seen men say they want their sons to have it so they’ll get laid more. I wonder who is setting that standard. Sort of like the increase in height surgeries since women won't entertain a 5'4 dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:20 PM
-1

I'll go one further and say they want/encourage male genital mutilation for the aesthetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:12 PM
1

What labor are you expected to perform while dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:05 PM
2

Women often say men's bodies are ugly without anyone claiming they are misandrist. Try again. Your reasoning fails.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 09:22 PM
1

Have you ever asked? Have I asked if they were being abused? No. But I have lifelong friends who I am very close with who share intimate issues and no, abuse wasn't one of them. Not to mention, many don't even know they're being abused, especially considering that there are several different types of abuse that can take place within a relationship and multiple different types of relationships that can take place between two people or multiple people. Don't redefine abuse to fit your narrative. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 01:35 PM
1

Your friends sure know how to pick them or maybe it's the people you surround yourself with because surely not every single woman I know has been in an abusive relationship. In fact, it's more of a rarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 01:30 PM
2

Are all your friends in abuse shelters?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 11:59 AM

Got ya
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 09:38 PM
18

Generally, it's only worthwhile discussing democracies.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 09:38 PM

Why are random words capitalized?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 09:26 PM
1

Are you sure you’re not conflating the study that includes lesbians having been divorced from men and experienced domestic violence at the hands of men before they got in any relationships with women? It has to do with this statement. You called them lesbians, not bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 07:46 PM
3

The problem is not a gender. It's the reasons for divorce: infidelity, financial difficulties, abuse, regular limits of a relationship. There are many reasons and "working on your marriage" is not a magic phrase to make shit better. Yet your earlier paragraphs contradict this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 07:45 PM
2

There are no absolutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 07:41 PM
3

Sure, but the comment you seem to be defending is a definitive claim that lesbians get married at a younger age.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:32 PM
4

So women are not born lesbian? They are made that way via DV from men? That's the new theory?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:14 PM
5

Explain the divorce rate of homosexual men through your lens of coercion. I'm not sure why the quick marriage among women is a justification for you. Seems to say women are reckless at choosing partners, ignoring red flags along the way. Sounds like hedonism.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:09 PM
1

What does this have to do with the average age of marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:08 PM
1

Have you compared to the level of trauma predating heterosexual relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:06 PM
0

What even tells you, that couples that do not divorce are getting along well? Because divorce is a threshold event. Whether you like it or not, it is a pretty good proxy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:05 PM
5

Lesbian couples tend to move in with each other much faster and take big life steps much faster. I don't know why you think this is a justification.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:01 PM
3

It still holds the same implication. An equal amount of bad relationships leading to a higher divorce rate than other categories does not track. Assume a simple model where you ascribe blame to one party or another for a "bad" relationship. And a bad relationship leads to divorce. A higher divorce rate implies there are more women doing "bad" things to end the relationship. Someone would need to work through how it makes statistical sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 02:55 PM
2

You seem to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:57 PM
1

And men? Oh, you didn't answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:53 PM
1

Ok, how many women are in the woods in her lifetime?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:50 PM
2

Are bears typically in the business of raping humans after tearing them apart? Do bears pretend to help humans? How many women are in the woods on an annual basis?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:49 PM
2

Problem solved. Everyone is discussing a situation that they either a) never experience or b) never will experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:43 PM
0

Ok, how many bears does the hypothetical woman see on a trail in her lifetime? There you go. We're in the land of hypotheticals.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:41 PM
4

Yes. What's the point here?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:35 PM
1

How many bears does the typical woman see on a trail in her lifetime?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:34 PM
-2

If you antagonize a bear, it will attack. Maybe don't antagonize other mammals and you'll be fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:32 PM
2

Check your millennial math. Most were becoming young adults during and after the Great Recession.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 08:40 PM

I wonder how society progressed when there was no compulsory education
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 06:28 PM

Because one person is contributing more financially. If you would like it to be that way, then each person should consume only what they bring into the household and no more.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:45 PM
1

Lead with that. Say you're an engineer for the train system. Leave it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:43 PM

No goalposts were changed unless you think being a soldier isn't a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:42 PM

That's the economic value. It's objective and market based. It's worth as much as someone is willing to pay for the labor. I'm not using another fuzzy measure that's a matter of opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:36 PM

I can measure the value in terms of dollars per hour.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:30 PM
1

Women use the bachelor degree as a signaling mechanism to stay away from blue collar workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:23 PM

And women throughout history, have also died with no offspring doing dangerous jobs. Ah yes, all those female soldiers we heard about.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:20 PM
1

They're both in Project 2025. What do you define MAGA as, if you don't define it by Project 2025's standards? Project 2025's authors are not "MAGA". It's the Heritage Foundation. Dismantling the Education department for example wasn't MAGA. That was on a Republican wishlist for decades. I can counter that Trump said he's the greatest supporter of women - are we to take that as a counter to your point? The fact that they use female spokespersons doesn't mean they don't want women to submit to men…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:19 PM

Ok. So are most of the comments here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:06 PM

You do understand men throughout history have died with no offspring, by doing dangerous jobs, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:03 PM
2

I'm trying to understand how women are oppressed under your rubric. For one thing, the lifestyle that MAGA promotes is not "traditional", as it only barely existed for like two decades in the mid 1900s. Which part of MAGA are you referring to? The part where Marjorie Taylor Greene is a congresswoman and Pam Bondi is the top law enforcement agent in the country? Otherwise, a woman not having an income in her own name is not in her best interest, unless she is taking steps to mitigate the husband'…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:02 PM

You don't think CEOs are busting their ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:53 PM

? Is that the part you're responding to, because I said CEO?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:04 PM

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:53 PM

This is also a matter of opinion. If the engineer didn't design the roads, buildings and homes, no one would be able to do much of anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:53 PM

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:52 PM

The engineer's time is more valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:38 PM

Women want an HR job to make as much as a stressful software engineer job, but women on average don’t want to do the actual software engineer job. This is the part that's unsaid. They want the cushy air conditioned office job where they are talking about feelings while making as much as the CEO or sewage treatment worker.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:36 PM
1

So do you believe choosing to live a traditional lifestyle is self harm? What aspects of maga are contrary to what you wrote?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:30 PM
2

Do you believe feminism means the right for a woman to determine her own outcome in life?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:18 PM
3

But she's the one having multiple children with multiple men. She carries the burden of pregnancy as ya like to say. Women take all the risk, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:53 PM
3

Yes, so one would think she would select better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:50 PM
2

It means women are more likely to have children by men who already have children. 15% of men have children with multiple partners. Almost double the amount of women, 30% have children with multiple partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:47 PM
-2

Are you making the claim that you can't be MAGA and a feminist? This can be easily disproven.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:45 PM
1

For men: Prevalence: Approximately 15% of men will have children with multiple women by age 40. Associated factors: This is more common among men with lower incomes, less education, and those who were incarcerated or whose first birth was unintended and occurred outside of a marital or cohabiting union. Relationship: Men with children by multiple partners may have a higher number of total children, and some studies indicate higher levels of relationship instability. For women The likelihood of h…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:39 PM
-4

If people lie in job interviews, this is no different.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 05:14 AM
2

Future has 7 children. You're saying baby mother #3-7 were misinformed?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 05:05 AM
3

Also you hear about the extra emotional labor a woman put in to organize an entire day with a complete agenda on her bf's day off when her bf didn't want to do anything, and they talk as if the bf was lazy and shouldn't be anything except thankful when it was basically work for him to go along with it. Emphasis mine This part is the most sickening. Being dragged to hang out with awful friends, make small talk, do ridiculous things that you don't care about and still having to keep a sunny dispos…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:26 AM
8

It's not that they don't understand. They don't care. Most modern women have deep narcissistic traits where they have a high estimation of what they do (even though it may be minor to a relationship) and are completely blind to what a man does in a relationship. This is why, although everyone can objectively agree money is important to living, a woman these days would say a man working too much, while she does very little or stays at home, is her performing emotional labor because she has to ele…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:22 AM
2

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:59 PM
-2

Give the child up for adoption.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:57 PM
2

You can also choose to gather information in the face of imperfect information. That's called vetting.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:52 PM
-4

Get an abortion
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:51 PM
0

You guys believe men I do believe men. What's the problem with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:50 PM
4

we are understanding Happy you understand why.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:47 PM
9

Yes. Blame the victims when they are reckless. If you are Future's 2nd through last baby mother, blame yourself. He's a known quantity. I don't understand how you don't get this. When you have knowledge of something, you have the responsibility of acting with that knowledge. If you want to act stupid and get knocked up by a deadbeat, don't come complaining anywhere about it. Shut the fuck up and live a quiet life of pain. We don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:44 PM
5

Wait - you mean the men who have multiple baby mothers that was known to the woman who decided they wanted to be #5? A serial killer will continue to kill. It's what they do. But when the serial killer is particularly looking for people who wear red shirts, and you wear a red shirt everyday thinking you'll be immune, yes, don't be surprised when people say you were dumb for wearing a red shirt.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:39 PM
3

The solution is to not play the game. Attention is currency. Stop paying it. Let them wallow and figure out what their priorities are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:25 PM
1

So women are attracted to shitty men - you're just trying to justify it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 07:06 PM
1

I’m happily married, but fewer people now want either marriage or family. Great! It’s great for individuals who are happy with this in their personal life, women seem to do better without sex than men, but it’s not great for society in general. Nothing survives forever. Why are women sacrificing for "society"? I thought in all other areas, you push back against what society cares about, like the "patriarchy", "body image" or "beauty standards". Ya go your own way on all that stuff that makes you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:52 PM
6

Why are they asking? Just don't. I don't get this. You don't like meat, you become vegetarian. You don't discuss amongst yourselves. You make the decision and go from there. Someone asks you if you want a steak, you say no, I didn't eat meat. No dissertation, no discussion. You don't want to be with men, make your decision and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:34 PM
8

You were talking about eating pb&j sandwiches. Keep up. Just because your ancestors were developmentally challenged, doesn't mean most men are. Take it up with the women who procreated with them and created offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:33 AM
2

I don't complain about anyone's standards. But I will point and laugh when they are on TikTok crying about being alone, how no one wants them and how they are going to be single forever. They had sky high standards but forgot to look in the mirror and see the person looking back at them didn't meet this same standards. I'm in a happy relationship, thank you very much.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:03 AM
9

Are you dense? Someone who has crafted a simple life for themselves now has to do more complicated shit because you think you need to have 14 throw pillows on your couch? You're one of those fools who told people they needed to be in mcmansions when they were happily in a 1 bdrm apt. Now they have to clean up 4 beds and 3 baths and are unhappy. You're complaining that someone doesn't want complicated shit in your life? Some people think your life is terrible and want no parts to it. While at the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:01 AM
7

Women also tend to come into your space and have already designed plans for how they will change it, by mostly making things more complicated than they already are, adding to the burden of upkeep.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:56 AM
6

Again, why do you care? Why are joining the victim parade when you just said your personal experience is not this? What are you hoping to achieve?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:41 AM
9

Adjusted for shit that's unnecessary, I would probably say it's about even. Just because someone wants to fluff 8 pillows on the bed with a complicated duvet when a simple bed set would do is likely the source of a lot of this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:40 AM
7

Then die alone. There's a solution to everything. If it isn't worth it, don't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:35 AM
8

Who cares? Who are you to prescribe a more complicated life for someone to live? There are tech people drinking soylent all day because they have other priorities. You want them to focus on making coq au vin in their homes when they don't give a damn what they eat. People have different priorities. Just because it doesn't match yours means nothing. Solution - find someone who matches your priorities and stop fucking complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:35 AM
10

Why the fuck would she get with him?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:25 AM
2

Sounds like someone who wants a simple life and can live off a PB&J sandwich. That should tell you something.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:24 AM
3

I don't how old your granpa is, but he sounds developmentally challenged. Maybe your mother's husband doesn't want to celebrate Christmas and put a ridiculous amount of decorations. Why are you ironing your friend's boyfriend's shirt? Are you fucking him? Why wouldn't you be cooking for your boyfriend in the future? Are you expecting not to cook at all, ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:21 AM

Blue pill personality fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:55 AM
7

They're "settling".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:53 AM
1

I don't want anything. It's simply a recognition of how things are - observed reality. You folks are the legacy kid telling the inner public school kid that he just needed to study harder to get into Harvard. That's what AF|BB refers to. You can ignore that reality if you want to. And yes, one would be cognizant that you be with people who actually like you. Not some resource leech that settles for you because they believe their time is running out or that makes you jump through 50 hoops to show…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 04:53 PM
3

In the work world, you'll call it nepotism when the amount of effort the CEOs son needs to get a job is far less than the pull himself up by the bootstraps mid level school kid. You didn't view nepotism as a good thing. In Higher Ed, it's called legacy or daddy wrote a big check. I would already think you'd find that unfair.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 04:43 PM
11

Why do you act as if what you do at 18 is completely disconnected from your life experience and results at 30?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 04:39 PM
1

Why would you assume all other women would be failures just because you were a failure in your relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 11:16 PM

Have you tried spending it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 04:12 PM

Well if you're going to ask why, you're going to be told.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 04:10 PM

Poor decision making
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 04:08 PM
0

This really sounds like believe women even if they're lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 08:58 PM
1

And that's fine. Those aren't usually the people going on a social media campaign.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 08:57 PM
1

They don't have to be made public. Just like the victim's names in these cases are often hidden for their own protection. The court system has ways to have closed door cases. It need only be public to the attorney representing the accused.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 08:03 PM
3

Would you also extend this to cases where the accuser was just found ‘not guilty’ tho? Because people can be found ‘not guilty’ for a multitude of reasons, and only means they were found not guilty in the court of law. They could still have actually committed the crime, and they weren’t falsely accused just because there wasn’t enough evidence, for example. No. In that case, the case is public record and anyone can see what happened. The issue is with accusations that are not tested in court or …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:52 PM
0

I don't disagree with any of that. Court is highly technical and you need to get all the components right to prove guilt.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:49 PM
2

About name blind - okay, i don't see how it's possible It's very much possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:47 PM
0

You can prosecute. You just need evidence. If you can't prosecute, you don't have a case.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:42 PM
3

There needs to be remedies just like if someone's identity is stolen. A letter from the state that follows them saying they were falsely accused. Need news coverage to place statements on their website as to the current state of things [it was determined x was falsely accused by y] with a link pointing to said letter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:40 PM
6

Distinction without a difference. Certainly by "believe women", it wasn't meant to be read as "Believe some women".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:35 PM
6

No one has to say most accusations have to be false. Only enough that begins to call into question the nature of these accusations. You don't ask whether most commercial flights crash, but you'd certainly question and feel some type of way if 3 commercial flights crashed in a row. The point is if there is a critical mass (far less than 51%) of false accusations that have occurred, it's a problem, just as if you would be troubled if you saw the post conviction exoneration rate in a justice system…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:32 PM
8

Seriously. The shrieking on here by people defending her was ridiculous. The same with Roda Osman who claimed she got in the face with a brick by a man. That is what becomes dangerous when attention is a commodity. Wrongfully accusing people to increase their own profile. This should put to bed the call to believe all women. We need to be more focused on finding the truth. I doubt those who were making excuses here will say they have egg on their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:15 PM

The problem is she doesn't keep her dissatisfaction to herself. She joins the cacophony of voices saying men are defective because she can't achieve some ridiculous standard, then jobs with the other voices of equally delusional women creating a social cry that is somehow men's fault that they can't achieve their delusional fantasies.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 12:19 AM

Treat them the same way we treat schizophrenics.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 12:16 AM

Having rye bread as someone going hungry is different than having no bread at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 12:08 AM

It's sad really. And you see it in many other contexts, especially in the Therapy Industrial Complex. When a woman is old, single and has trouble staying in a long term relationship, the party line is: women are happier single! Look at the data! Being in a relationship with a man is dangerous! But when men are generally single: there's a male loneliness crisis! Men need to do better to be in relationships! Men aren't emotionally mature enough! They will come up (and others will go along) with ps…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 11:57 PM
1

If there were no men, your argument would be a moot point given humanity would not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:35 PM
1

So the solution is to make sex a crime outside of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:31 PM
2

The only way to find out is to remove external enforcement and see what happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:17 PM
3

They seem to come from the "trust me bro" school of philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:19 PM
-4

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:42 AM
-1

Pussy is plug that makes their equations work.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:40 AM
-1

You take a shit on your bath mat? And who said "months at a time"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:37 AM
1

Show your research concerning this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:35 AM
7

No. This makes no sense whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:08 PM
8

You're implying I'm here because I'm unhappy. You just be here for the same reason. Single, lonely and unhappy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:08 PM
9

People in relationships don't have opinions? At least you admit that you aren't happy. I'm sorry for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 04:57 AM
4

Unlike you, I'm in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 02:29 AM
14

Getting married and being marriage material are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:28 AM
13

If she is a whore, she is not marriage material.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 10:04 PM
2

So women?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 03:02 PM
2

This already happens with sports.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 02:59 PM

Women are narcissists who rewrite the rules of what they want depending on how they slept the night before. When they work, the money is for them which is why by and large, women want men who make more than they do, while not realizing the complete irony that they are the bum in that situation. They are consumers/destroyers of wealth, wherever they go. Ask yourself - who is most likely to reject the idea of a prenup? If a relationship doesn't financially benefit them, they complain. So no, this …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 01:35 PM
4

It's because the bar for women is in hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 11:04 PM
5

Ah, so here you are on social media, telling us what real life looks like. Oh wise one, go ahead and tell us about this wonderful world!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 08:29 PM
0

Seriously. They lather themselves in olive oil then make these wild claims. Try to catch them they say - it's a fool's errand.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:50 PM
0

Define love first so we can understand what you're claiming is low.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:19 PM
5

Maybe, just maybe, it's observed in the real world. You not experiencing it is meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:05 PM
0

AI is turning brains to mush, I swear. You won't read a single original source, but you want Gemini to summarize it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:13 AM
1

You made the claim that I was wrong. So prove it. Ha ha. I spewed bullshit, now show I'm wrong. Not how this works buddy. You made various claims. Show your work that misogyny has increased from some objective baseline. Show that misandry was caused by misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:09 AM
1

You made the claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:59 AM
1

More SIGN language because you can't defend your statements, and that's sad. You fail at debating. No men are not entitled to have whatever the hell they want. You honestly don’t sound like a good person to begin with. This is where you become emotional because your line of sight becomes myopic. The comment said "do whatever I want as a man" meaning defining his own manhood. You see " entitled to have whatever they want". You can't even read well. Or maybe you can and you honestly believe men do…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:58 AM
1

Oh, so women were enslaved under chattel slavery? Is that your argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:54 AM
1

Common sense clearly isn't common. Show an event, historical evolution, something. Not some axiomatic statement that "of course misogyny created misandry". If you don't know, say I don't know. I just said that it wouldn’t exist if not for misogyny Because it’s literally women reaction to being fed up of oppression. Show your work. You're making these flailing claims with no historical backing. Which still continues today despite women having equal rights. It’s significant in work place, SA cases…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:53 AM
-2

I didn't need your opinion. Show your claim where misogyny causes misandry. Your other link doesn't show misogyny "not decreasing". You have to do better than Google AI. Point to a research study with a baseline of "misogyny" and an increase from said baseline.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:37 AM
-1

Whatever he wants. That's what he said.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:30 AM
-1

Misogyny has not decreased at all and misogyny created misandry. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:28 AM
16

I want pure equality. No picking and choosing the parts you like. Pure unadulterated equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:19 AM
1

I didn't know you were right next to me to see my state of mind. Why are you so angry?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 11:53 PM

This is such a terrible take, but let's dismantle this one by one. I am a man and I have noticed this with the following examples. I'm confused - is this statement an appeal to authority? Men see sex as something being done to women rather than it being something both men and women do. So because of this anything a woman has to say about dating dynamics is automatically invalid to most men. You cannot be serious with this comment. Women most often vote sex as something that exclusively benefits …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 11:41 PM
3

This is a debate sub. If you don't want men talking, probably go to the femcel sub or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:15 PM
3

Most men do. Women are the ones harping about emotional sensitivity and all that other bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:12 PM
3

Your first mistake was assuming men wanted to be vulnerable. That's women wanting men to act like women. So the ones who are vulnerable are giving you what you want and picking up crumbs of pussy along the way. You are the authors of your own demise.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:06 PM

No one even comes close to bitching at the level women do in public that no one wants them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 05:44 PM
1

Then why the fuck do men expect us to tolerate that shit from men? Make up your mind. Men aren't vulnerable remember?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 05:38 PM
1

Men are doers, not talkers. Why would we want to hear women whine and become raging narcissists who hijack our issues to talk more about themselves and use their faux therapy tactics.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:33 PM
9

No relationship is "equal".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:17 PM

Are you talking why: Remember that's why you never follow a woman's advice for dating if you are a man, they will be fucking any tom dick harry in a one nighter but ask you to get a job , have a personality, get rich , get a proper job , dress so and so which I am not saying it doens't work ..
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:06 PM

Absolutely not jealous of women like that. I pity them. I would never consider a woman like that for a relationship or anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:57 PM

Actively getting dick from a hobosexual then saying you deserve better is nasty work.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:53 PM
2

What makes you think he wants a 40 year old woman and cares about what she's attracted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:46 PM
12

They yasss queen that woman to death
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:43 PM
1

My bad, I posted under the wrong automod.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:42 PM
-1

It's older women's heightened overestimation of their worth in the sexual marketplace. They need something to cling to so they are indirectly saying older women are better. It's not only a revenge fantasy, it's heightened delusion and grasping at the last straws of sexual value.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:41 PM

You hear this when they say "I need a man who's ambitious" but they've been in a multi year FWB situationship with a hobosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:38 PM
0

What does "same socioeconomic level as your family" mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 07:35 AM
5

I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 06:18 PM
0

I'd agree, if not for the constant messaging we get to from women to create "better men", to call them out, etc. We know what that means.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 06:15 PM
21

Women don't want to be educated sadly. What they want is for other men to make the toxic ain't shit men they are attracted to better for them and only them. It's sad really.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 04:16 PM
1

The store is the person being approached, the person getting hit on. Generally that is women. Hope that helps! Edit - I also see you ignored all of the very simple insurance examples that make a similar point!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 04:13 PM
3

I'm not surprised you don't get it. I suggest you look up adverse selection and moral hazard. Your response is nonsensical. You have the same thinking as people who say they don't get car insurance because they are great drivers. By making decisions that get you taken advantage of, then complaining that you were taken advantage of, with no change in your behavior, you're abdicating responsibility for yourself. Risk reduction techniques should be part of the package. That's why women who have the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:56 PM
2

Yea - your position is at odds with the majority of humans. In every case where something similar has happened, the store owner would be at fault for creating the conditions that led to violence. Anywho, there has always been a moral hazard and adverse selection issue in dating. It exists in most human endeavors. It is up to the person bearing the risk to put tools in place to reduce their exposure. For example, life insurance companies have health exams or car insurance companies have age/educa…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:24 PM
0

Answer the question first.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:09 PM
1

You opened a store and say you are giving out 10 free iPhones (or some popular thing). A bunch of people show up - some good, some terrible. The terrible people begin beating others with bats so they get to the front of the line. You choose to not have any security, no line - it's just pure mayhem outside your store. Who do you think is at fault in that case? Take it one step further. You open your store - see a bunch of bloodied and beaten people on the floor but you see there are 10 people out…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:07 PM
1

Of course it won't. But she will find that her resources are not sufficient to support her lifestyle generally or even her retirement, so she will seek out a simp willing to underwrite her until 1) she gets lucky or 2) sufficiently has used the legal system to buttress her financial security and then leave. She begins to give the unattracteds a second look.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 02:48 PM

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:43 PM

Have you seen the suicide rate among young men? Getting rejected repeatedly because they are who they are - what do you think that leads to?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:32 PM

I say the same thing when a woman wears a lot of makeup, fake lashes, fake nails, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 07:00 PM

"Just be yourself bro" The advice is laughable at best, dangerous at worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 02:33 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 01:25 PM
9

Receiving gifts is an even bigger red flag. It means women want you only for your money.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 01:23 PM
3

I think we equally know.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 03:38 AM
7

It means that loyalty is for sale to the highest bidder.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:53 PM
5

Anyone who disagrees with that basic premise is a misogynist. Loyalty is for sale to the highest bidder. We must just embrace the world we live in and stop being delusional. As the great philosopher Brown once said "These hoes ain't loyal".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:52 PM
3

You have no idea what they were thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:48 PM
10

😂😂😂 those paragons of rule followers.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:44 PM
11

You go to a nice restaurant and eat a perfectly cooked ribeye and drink the best wine - you know it will end, so what's the point? For the experience. It's just your turn, enjoy the ride while it lasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:43 PM
2

but I’ve never heard about a woman using a weapon in real life( rarely I’ve seen it in the news) https://www.live5news.com/2025/02/08/woman-stabs-boyfriend-neck-after-argument-over-wedding-venue-police-say/ https://wcti12.com/news/local/greenville-woman-arrested-for-alleged-knife-assault-on-man https://local21news.com/news/local/lancaster-county-woman-accused-of-stabbing-man-with-steak-knife-police https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/police-woman-attacked-man-knife-215403782.html?ch=1 https://ny…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 09:42 PM
2

But you wrote: A man should never hit a woman no matter what
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 08:06 PM
2

So if a woman is chasing you around the house with a knife, attempting to stab you, you shouldn't hit her to fend her off?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 07:09 PM
1

Reproductive supremacy you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:34 PM
1

Interesting how you left out economic equality. And with these come social, economic and political responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:33 PM
1

👍🏿
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:24 PM
1

Not a rant, a response. Good 👍🏿
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:24 PM
-7

I feel like that's why I posted under the automod. You understand how this sub works?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:23 PM
1

Yes. Because it benefits me. I take care of my own home currently. It's really not that hard. It's called being an adult. No one said life should be easy. You make your decisions and you live with them. As an adult, you take of your responsibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:22 PM
1

I mean, you shouldn't. I don't understand how you think this response changes anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:21 PM
0

I can care less about the birth rate. And I can care less about some magical standards you have. Your results are the only things that matter. If you can't find what you're looking for, you don't qualify for it. It's a hard pill to swallow but no one sees you as you see yourself. You were just delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:20 PM
-3

Exactly. A man should not work himself like a mule and modern day slave just for a woman to claim she isn't happy or they "grew apart" taking years of his hard work in the process. No way. Equality means everyone works. There is no other way. Women are in the labor market - wonderful! Increased labor participation decreases average wages. Thus, women need to work to contribute to maintain the same standard of living.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:16 PM
-1

I agree. Do just that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:12 PM
-4

The broke men need to worry less about having children and more about getting money. Y’all can barely afford a good life alone for yourself and now you wanna torture your future wife and kids too lol. SIGN language to justify laziness. I'm good with my financial situation, earning in the top 3%. Staying at home is an opportunity cost for a woman. If she is out of the workforce 5 years to raise kids, that’s 5 years of experience she’s missing out on to get raise and promotions. Then don't leave t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:11 PM
-3

Who said I don't see value in it. It's not revenue producing. There is no monetary value to it, except to benefit one's self. Yes, I want her to have a job. In that case, you share in the burdens of what it takes to run a home which is first and foremost, money. No money, no home to take care of.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:07 PM
-3

The people who call it financial abuse ignore the idea of tradeoffs. The reality is, it is much easier to spend someone else's money than it is your own. It doesn't matter, marriage or not, having skin in the game means you work, and the time and effort put into work generally translates into being cautious with how your money is spent. An allowance simply balances the playing field. It places reasonable restrictions on how money can be spent by the person earning it. Pretty sure there will be a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 01:59 PM
2

I think you should answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 12:44 PM
2

Why do we need to amplify their voices? They have a voice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 12:43 PM
2

You are completely wrong. They are called white knights because you've considered what they've said and it is usually devoid of logic. One questions why they would hold that Illogical opinion expect to get crumbs of pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 12:41 PM
3

Or assault generally. Doing nothing and being a bystander when a woman is hitting a man, but becoming a knight of the round table when he retaliates.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 12:03 PM
2

Definitionally, you're just wrong. If you were to say people use terms in the wrong way, that's one thing. But the definition is quite clear from a quick Google search: In slang, a "white knight" is a person, often a man, who rushes to defend someone online, particularly a woman, in an unsolicited and excessive way, usually with the motive of gaining romantic or sexual favor. The term is typically derogatory, implying the defender is trying to "rescue" someone who doesn't need rescuing and is mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:59 AM
18

In response to a post that starts with "I don't think".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 04:10 PM
7

Do you really think sharing in life's small things, like making someone lunch, makes you a pick me? So men shouldn't pay for dates, pick you up when you're stranded somewhere, help you carry groceries, etc, because that would make him a simp? You want to push the message "never settle" while realizing no one will settle for you. The men you want don't want you, or else you would have him. The results speak for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 03:58 PM
1

Don't let facts get in your way. Folks complain about how the wage disparity, but when you point out a natural analog of that, assuming one believes it, you all of a sudden throw a different rationale. No one forced them to get pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 12:01 PM
-1

Well, generally by men's taxes. But yes, please continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 11:20 AM
5

I'll keep it simple. Women want men who other women want, even in church. Easy exhibit - the preacher is likely fucking multiple women in his flock.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 10:50 AM
6

They would. Look, let's be real. In the Christian tradition, even Eve are the apple and Adam followed suit. And they were created by God's direct hand. You aren't going to tell me that regular men and women, horny as fuck, will suppress it? Why? You have an automatic out, forgiveness! There's no punishment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:37 AM
1

Out of the mouth of babes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:31 AM
3

Again, extremely rare. 98% of men don't get sick from ejaculation. Sorry for your condition though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:26 AM
8

Chads learn early in life what women say and what they do are like Mr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. The UbërChad learns this far earlier in life, using his chad-like skills early in the school environment. He's perfected the art of NSA sex. The average Chad typically learns it later in life, say in his late teens, and realizes he has a harem of women at his disposal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:24 AM
11

Visit a church, lol. Even in a church, the men who are the most wanted are those who have slept with many women in the congregation. Don't get fooled by the okey doke. People in churches are having lots of sex out of wedlock.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:20 AM
2

What do you call this? That's only true if a man is past a certain age like 30+. A statement of fact?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 12:37 AM
1

I'd argue, mid-20s the latest.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 12:26 AM
13

The problem is women don't stay around long enough to learn the reasons, so that's a moot point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 11:06 PM
5

This is so off base, it must be rage bait. Women want men who other women want. Men who have social proof with other women. That's why women don't want virgins. No woman wants to be the first test case. It would be a form of settling, which we know women don't want to do. And there's no way you women came up with the term incel, which quite literally means involuntarily celibate, which is a shot at the bow of any male virgin and you have this take.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 11:04 PM
12

BECAUSE THEY ARE LYING THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 04:20 PM
1

Again, state the facts in this case. Not your hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 04:13 PM
1

It wasn't always done. The issue is an accuser can make an accusation, be protected, then choose not to move forward with it, leaving a void that the accused, publicly known, must navigate. The drawback is we, as a public, won't know what prosecutorial powers are being used in our name.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 04:13 PM
2

What was she charged for? It wasn't vague. What were the underlying facts? The deflection here is rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 02:03 PM
2

Except that's exactly how it works. That's not how it works. So to you, because the crime and punishment doesn't specifically say "false accusations" it somehow doesn't count as punishment? The law is exact. Unlike here, words mean something. If it wasn't for a false accusation, it wasn't for a false accusation. There are many false accusations that in and of themselves have gone unpunished. She was charged with theft by deception because she created a GoFundMe, raised 40k and spent the money. H…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:52 PM
2

She was charged for an ancillary crime. She was not jailed for making a false accusation. The risk still remains.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:31 PM
2

It presumes neutrality.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:29 PM
0

The response is to wait for the facts, in either direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:25 PM
0

Our legal system does not allow this, unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:12 PM
0

Wouldn't you want an all expense paid meal that you had to plan from beginning to end, which cost you nothing, with the power of rejection at the end if you didn't feel the "vibes"?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 06:22 PM
7

The options they've always had - men that find them attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 01:43 PM
2

It becomes unattractive when their own interests are harmed or implicated by an emotionally mature guy. If they can't get away with the weaponization of emotions, all of the sudden, emotional maturity becomes something new and transformed, like "controlling", "narcissism", "DARVO", or whatever new pop buzz words their Tik Tok compatriots dream up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 12:11 PM
6

Fortune favors the bold
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 09:33 PM
1

Watch what they do, not what they say. It can all be so simple. A lot of this emotional vulnerability/maturity/intelligence crap is Tik Tok induced buzzwords by pop therapist. They repeat it because they saw it somewhere and it sounds good. They don't know what it means. You ask 100 women, you'll get 100 different answers. They will hammer it over your head to explain why they don't want to be with the proverbial average guy but when Chad comes along with the emotional maturity of a gnat, he'll …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 09:27 PM
2

Women's intuition is one of the most bigoted statements out there then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 04:34 PM
2

It's because women generally believe they are the main character in everyone's lives and should be treated as such. Their feelings and experiences take primacy over everyone and everything else. To disagree or not validate their feelings is the highest insult because they believe they are always right. Remember, these are the same folks who created weird concepts like "vibes", "energy", "a woman's intuition is always right" and things like that, completely unsupported by facts, but all resting o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 12:02 PM
1

It's because of this strange obsession women generally have with being the main character in everyone's lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:52 AM
2

it will make men think that the real problem are women Not think. They are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:50 AM
1

Read the first post in this thread and you'll see. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:57 PM
-1

Of course. She gave another man the highest honor - risking her life to have his child. So now, she can just have a good time with the next guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 03:34 PM
1

Until she risks her body for him, it's just a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:53 PM
1

Did you read my post or are you dense? You're trying to change the measure that I brought up in my post then accuse me of moving the goalposts. Nice to see you don't have an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:52 PM
-1

How many babies did she have for those men? Did she risk her body for those men? No. You're purposely being dense and missing the point by pointing to one woman, with a very poor argument, when I gave you countless examples of women in their prime going after older men to carry their seed. They are willing to be baby mother # [_] by choice to a valuable man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:51 PM
0

You responded to my post about harems of women having these men's babies and now you accuse me of moving the goalposts by me asking if she has Elon's babies? Make it make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:47 PM
0

Did she have his babies?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:27 PM
1

How many men's babies did she have prior to Musk?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:25 PM
-1

And? He does it because that amount of money is meaningless to him. And Grimes has a new boyfriend now. 😂😂😂 She risked her body to have a baby for a man in a harem and your response is someone got to eat the leftovers?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:24 PM
1

Wonderful. He has Musk's leftovers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:22 PM
-1

You're right, men don't have a prime because there is no ceiling. It's ever increasing. So long as men like Elon Musk and Bill Gates and the like continue to gain more financial resources, there will be women waiting in the wings for their chance, even as part of a harem. Look at the women in their prime willing to risk their bodies for Eddie Murphy, Elon Musk, Nick Cannon, Robert DeNiro, Jude Law, Alec Baldwin, Mel Gibson, Diddy and the list goes on, even when some of these women knew they were…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 01:24 PM
4

So men aren't looking stuff up online either because it's not that big a deal to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 05:09 AM
2

Why can't smile be used? It's not like smiling is some unique aspect of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:58 AM
7

Your evidence is the existence of a website?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:56 AM
5

I'm very interested to see the response to this
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:46 AM
3

Someone doesn't understand basic law... I learned this basic shit in high school.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:29 PM
1

When she was on his porch, she was in his house. What don't you understand about that? She was on his property. She simply had to place a bag in front of a door (the location specified) and leave. What did she choose to do? Take out her camera. Angle herself so she had a view of the couch. Zoom in. You have no clue what she did because the damn video is from her biased perspective. It's not a ring camera that showed you the before, during and after. She's not a passive bystander taking a video.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:26 PM
1

No one was there. You're left taking the word of a person whose motive is to go viral on Tik Tok, judged by her actions after the fact, who is a biased and unreliable narrator and whose story has changed repeatedly. Folks are pointing out the inconsistencies, similar to what OP is doing, but his goal is to justify everything she did and call it a grand conspiracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:16 PM
7

Exactly. These arguments are flimsy and fail with the slightest bit of scrutiny.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:00 PM
3

No. Make your argument. Don't point to random documents. Use your words.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:52 PM
2

You should ask OP that. He is the one justifying her actions by saying they legally are permissible using doctrines of plain sight. You keep bringing up the guy. The guy is the object of the video. We are discussing her actions - the person who filmed a sleeping man and uploaded it to the Internet - being justified because things were in plain sight. Hope you can understand the nuance. There is no justification for recording video and especially posting a naked toddler to the Internet because a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:51 PM
1

She was told to leave food on the porch in front of the door. That's it. Simple instructions. She wasn't told to film inside his home. Leave the food at the door as instructed, and leave. How difficult is that? Now you want to turn it into a crime because she decided to stare at a naked man on his couch. She wasn't forced to, she chose to. She's a predator.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:45 PM
6

Because that's what you've just justified in your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:42 PM
2

This is the legal argument OP is making. That child pornographers should have access to publicly filmed toddlers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:40 PM
3

She's on his property.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:10 PM
5

No, because that's not the argument the OP made. They rest their entire argument on legal concepts of "plain view", "plain sight" and the door being in "public" so long as a naked toddler is in plain view, filming said video for child pornographers to see is justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:09 PM
3

So she could have just walked away after dropping the food off. She needed to have zero interaction with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:02 PM
3

The burden of proof is on you to show intent. You're doing quite poorly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:59 PM
8

So let's understand the blue pill argument. If a contractor was working on your front door or a window, and you were bathing your toddler, and say while drying your toddler, they start running through the house - the blue pill argument here is that they can film the naked toddler, and post it to the Internet for the world, including child pornographers, to see because the toddler did not have an expectation of privacy while the contractor had the door open?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:56 PM
9

Yes. No curtains.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:47 PM
2

I see a trend of women flocking to the party they say is taking away their rights..
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:44 PM
2

Women are responsible for Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:27 AM
0

I am not your free source of research labor. There are websites like that. Then don't participate in debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:27 AM
1

Now check votes for the Republican candidate. This doesn't give any information about affirmatively voting for what OP is talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:26 AM
1

Yes, it's been an increased share of the women vote over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 11:28 PM
2

Women are. Looking at voting trends over the past 8 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 11:28 PM
-3

Don't participate in debate where you're not prepared to defend your points with sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 10:57 PM
-1

But they've increasingly voted for these policies, so I didn't want to hear this weird narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 10:55 PM
2

Stick to the OP. While women's rights have been supposedly under attack, women moved increasingly to the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 10:14 PM
1

"Biden made gains with men, while Trump improved among women, narrowing the gender gap. The gender gap in the 2020 election was narrower than it had been in 2016, both because of gains that Biden made among men and because of gains Trump made among women. In 2020, men were almost evenly divided between Trump and Biden, unlike in 2016 when Trump won men by 11 points. Trump won a slightly larger share of women’s votes in 2020 than in 2016 (44% vs. 39%), while Biden’s share among women was nearly i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 10:04 PM
0

But more voted for Trump than the prior election which is what matters. I'm sure you know how elections work. The suburban women of a certain hue who swing back and forth are the ultimate ones who decide elections. They swung towards Trump because of the price of eggs, everything else be damned.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 04:54 PM
0

https://cawp.rutgers.edu/facts/voters/gender-differences-voter-turnout Scroll down to voters by gender who reported voting. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 03:15 PM
1

82mm women voted, 73mm men did.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 02:35 PM
2

They won't have a good answer to this. The most rabid anti-abortionist are women. Women are the ones who put Trump in office.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 01:55 PM
18

I too would like the salary of an NBA player while having the audience of a WNBA player. All of the benefits, none of the responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 12:22 AM

A part of society is talking about it. We are close to 50/50 on those who care and don't. More don't care about it than I would expect. What are you basing this conclusion on? The South Carolina law in consideration may even ban some daily oral contraceptive pills. Sure I could be more specific, but there are more examples than just that. This is not indicative of folks caring for maternal health. As opposed as I am to getting rid of contraceptive options for women, up to and including abortion,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 01:30 PM

Healthcare laws and deaths. This is vague. Articles from big publications and Jessica Valenti with her newsletter talk about it. So "society" is talking about it, contrary to your initial point. If it doesn't apply to your culture or your group, I think that's great, really. It actually does, thus my education on the topic. You're misguided. I'm just going on things I've seen near me (without fixing myself). All of the US has had an average rate of deaths increase when it already started off gre…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 01:21 PM

Literally one state. Women are not the only ones talking about this. I've know about the uptick in maternal mortality rates for a while now. It's been national news for a while. What reasons are abundantly clear? Have you spoken to ob/gyn's to determine whether "nothing is being done about it"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:44 PM

You don't make much sense. If "society" doesn't care about maternal deaths, how is it that everyone has the information that maternal deaths have increased and why are folks investigating the reasons why? A society who did not care would turn a blind eye to it and let it fester, but even as you admit, it's been detected "the last years" and not only has the NYT done a large story of it, multiple outlets have followed up. How is that indicative of a society that doesn't care about maternal health…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:34 PM
1

True
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:18 PM
2

Concert ticket are different
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:27 AM
5

If you decide to go be a stripper at a psychiatric hospital, you can expect some strange things to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:25 AM

A lot of society does not give a shit about women's healthcare, and maternal mortality. Checks insurance and what I'm covering with my premiums even though I don't use it as a man What the hell are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:18 AM
1

She never denied that was an option
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:08 AM
2

You don't have to pray for me. I'm good.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:42 AM
4

He started treating you bad while you were pregnant. You decided to keep your ties to him. You could have aborted. Nothing was stopping you. That's on you. The fact that you didn't use the tools available to you is no one's fault but yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:27 AM
4

Most times, the rationale is "I can change him".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 11:58 PM
1

Abortion is available to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 11:57 PM
9

What is the debate? Yes, if you haven't vetted the father of your children, you will be blamed for choosing a shitty person. You bear the risks of pregnancy as you ladies like to say, one would expect the one who bears the risk is the more vigilant one. Women control access to sex. Men control access to relationships. If you choose to be a man's 6th baby mother, that's your fault. If you choose to have a man's kid who you haven't vetted and have not gotten any commitment from and complain about,…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 11:55 PM
1

Women are hedonistic. End of story.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:43 PM
6

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:25 PM
0

Liberating on the revenue side, not the expense side.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:20 PM
6

I'm pro-slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 07:57 PM
6

I agree with you - women don't care about mental health. This is where I disagree. Women only care about it insofar as it can be weaponized in their favor. The Therapy Industrial Complex ("TIC") is a capitalist product of commoditizing mental health (in the domain where women stand to gain greater economic benefit) for profit and gain. Hence why you hear terms like he was a narcissist, therapy as maintenance, speaking my truth, I'm neurodivergent as a sexy label to be treated special, among many…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 07:19 PM
1

I don't know. Maybe they do. Someone should study that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 01:05 AM
1

Please, delete this response as soon as you can. Lol. You think this was a smart reply, it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:13 PM
-4

What makes you think they are in seedy buildings? You know what a seedy building is implying right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:06 PM
-3

I hear, like every profession, there are those who make a lot and those who make a little. There are high class escorts (a la Eliot Spitzer, former governor of NY) and lower cost prostitutes who sell their wares in the streets. There's variety across the budget spectrum. Very interesting how you view them with such disdain and believe they are all crack whores living on their last dollar.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:01 PM
3

As moral as the folks getting lattes from Starbucks knowing that one of the baristas only works there to support their heroin addiction and whose bf abuses her at home unless she goes to work everyday to bring him money. As moral as they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:57 PM
1

This is ridiculous. I can't walk into a grocery store and offer financial advisor services in exchange for my groceries either. A lot of these comments are grasping at straws and no one can actually coherently write a philosophical defense outside of "yuck".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:50 PM
0

If you were deep in a hardcore drug addiction and knew the only way to get your next fix was to suck a random man's dick, is that really a choice? Yes. Can't get a minimum wage job because of possible criminal record and the fact that she'd need to shoot up at work. It's the best of a very bad bunch of options. Yes, a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:39 PM
1

So dating is coercion as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:37 PM
-4

because there is no alternative way of making as much money FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:36 PM
1

They didn't propose cuts, they actually cut. That led to a rise in black lung disease. I'm not going to do your homework for you on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:29 PM
1

https://share.google/vLBjsjsbGumcIywm8
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:02 PM
0

The difference is one spreads public disease. This can happen at McDonald's. The difference is, for McDonald's, consumers are able to eat. For sex work, no one benefits except for through sadism. No one benefits? One person gets money. The other person received a service. Do you argue the same about the massage industry? No one benefits there? The difference is how two people who are working at McDonald's equally don't require one to pay the other. Yes, you do. In fact, McDonald's, similar to a …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:00 PM
0

What is all the time. We were talking about porn stars. You then create a larger group that includes more than porn stars and say look at these stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:53 PM
0

Let me add to this. Mine workers are dying from black lung. What are you even talking about? I don't see anyone up in arms about the forced labor of mine workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:49 PM
2

Exactly. Labor that one does not want to do is effectively slavery by their definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:47 PM
0

Sex worker =/= porn star.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:43 PM
5

I'm confused as to why the nature of the work matters. Porn stars have sex all the time on film. Is that rape to you? They are getting fucked and nutted on all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:33 PM
2

You're ok raping someone for their labor. You're just ok with it since it benefits you. Nice to know as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:16 PM
1

The same way you don't know whether someone who is serving you or providing a service is being paid a legal wage and is doing it for the money. But you have no outrage doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:13 PM
4

So was interracial marriage at one point. That's not the conversation and is irrelevant. You are simply appealing to authority at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:10 PM
3

You can also be coerced into working at McDonald's because you need the money to survive. What's the difference
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:07 PM
-1

And? Others put money on a pedestal.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:06 PM
0

So as long as she's thriving, is fine to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:05 PM
3

You literally created a definition of rape that says it's an unwanted use of your body.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:03 PM
0

What if she's having sex to thrive, a la Onlyfans?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 05:51 PM
3

First, you're very wrong. But let's assume you made sense. By that same thinking, are you calling the labor markets one big rape fest?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 05:49 PM
-3

Folks sell their bodies for labor everyday. Some well their bodies for scientific study. I too am confused why this differs.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 05:46 PM
1

Yup, they should. Everyone should choose better.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 05:49 PM
1

Still hit though
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 11:00 PM
1

"You know Steve's wife as been around. You know that guy with a huge dick that's fucking all those women? Yeah she was a side piece in his haram for months right before meeting Steve... That's the type of women he's settling for haha, Steve's big dick's leftovers." 😂😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 10:33 PM
3

😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 05:29 PM
5

So you agree men can get ruined without regard to socioeconomic status?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 05:23 PM
4

You just repeated what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:41 PM
1

Statistically, no more than the number of women who cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:25 PM
2

Preach
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:24 PM
6

Until said woman changes her socioeconomic status while in the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:23 PM
7

This. Men's mental load is dismissed or non-existent because they are taken as being a real man. Any complaints and they (women) question your sexuality in response.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:20 PM
1

Triggered by those words?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:15 PM
-1

Sure, but that's not what the studies and women's resulting talking points actually say.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 02:06 PM
3

The only difference between a situationship and a FWB is delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:46 PM

Like dude, you deny it, and then later in the same paragraph you do the same again, mocking any woman who went to college claiming she’s automatically a bitch screeching “qWeEenz”. You clearly have issues about women making money and going to school. And this is the problem. The sisterhood won't even concede that women with bad attitudes exist who make their education and career everything and walk around with the "I'm better than you" attitude. Pointing out a flaw in a large number of women who…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 11:42 AM
0

I think it's very interesting you switched your argument from claiming there's nothing about social class that makes any difference in a woman to specifying a "master in gender studies", a title routinely used to mock women with careers as being useless. It really shouldn't be interesting, because I used an example of one of my original three. This would fit in the education bucket. I get it, you think women shouldn't have jobs. Triggered much? Specify where I wrote that. When you make your educ…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:46 PM
1

You may feel there’s nothing inherent there, but statistically, higher educational outcomes for women are strongly correlated with lower divorce rates. The answer you're looking for is financial stability which you mention in your next paragraph. So long as household income is above a certain level, the divorce rate drops. But also remember, women will only typically date those who make the same or more than they do. You are not making the point you think you're making. No where in my statement …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 04:58 PM
4

It's because your reasoning is terrible and obfuscating the actual point. Women's careers and achievements do not matter because there is nothing inherent in a career, education or achievement that leads to a good relationship. No one has ever argued that being a good lawyer makes you a good wife or mother. Even further, as a general rule, women want men who make as much or more than they do as a barometer of fit. The amount of money one makes is generally arbitrary and has zero correlation to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:38 PM

Deflecting the question I see. This was about marriage, but I know, deflection is a sport for folks like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:28 PM

I mean, point me to a place, online or in the real world, where you find a group of men complaining about not being married. If not....
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:24 PM

You're watching too much 90 day fiance.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:18 PM

Go read r/Waiting_To_Wed and go see the huge number of desperate guys just screaming out to get married /s 😂😂😂 This comment is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:22 PM
2

Because men actually care about love. Women care about what can be done for them. They are transactional as fuck with little reciprocation, generally speaking. They expect to be taken care of as the base case. Not all, that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:28 PM
3

Glad to hear a woman finally say it. It was women who were staunchly anti abortion, so we can stop this whole, it's men trying to control women's bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 12:22 PM
5

No one cares about your standards. Go seek the billionaire 6'7 guy you've been pining for. The problem is that the men you want don't want you. Your experience tells you that you don't qualify - those men don't find you attractive. Essentially, you don't meet your own standards. Then, rather than work on yourself, you complain and blame the collective "men" saying they don't meet your standards, "where are all the good men" and other stupid comments like that. No - you just don't qualify for you…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 11:25 PM
5

No
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 03:49 PM
9

Not really. Also, read the fucking prompt.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 03:43 PM
28

If she doesn't like sex, she's not attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 02:12 PM
2

I'd rather touch grass in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:30 PM
5

Women are far more likely to post on social media like a daily diary, so I just don't believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:09 PM
4

Somehow i don't see that. I see daily posts about too high standards of women etc From other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:05 PM
1

You're acting like it's a singularly male phenomenon. You center women as perfect beings who men want to settle. No, you all want people who you think have (often better) qualities than you to choose you because it reinforces your belief of what you "deserve" and inflates your ego. You just don't want to call it settling when it comes to women. The point is everyone wants to be settled for by someone better than them. You (women) can't say you were settled for because it hurts your feelings and …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 01:57 PM
2

And those same women want the Chads to settle for them, so what's the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 01:48 PM

Being a hoe is an addiction. Lack of sexual discipline is similar to drug addicts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:36 PM

Addictions aren't normal by any stretch of the imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:28 PM
1

Because men lie to make women happy. You can't in one breath argue men withhold their feelings and are not "emotionally intelligent" while then taking what they say in surveys at face value. Either they are in touch with their emotions and express it or they lie to make women happy and don't say what they really feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 03:34 PM
0

Living longer is not indicative of quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:56 PM
1

Here's the secret: it isn't better for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:32 PM
1

I mean, of course they are. Otherwise, where would they be finding the women to beat in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 11:40 AM
4

Yea, I'm starting not to believe that she's a dancer
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 03:05 PM
-2

What kind of dance do you do?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:28 PM
4

Found the person who can't twerk
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 07:31 PM
1

The bar is in hell for women's skills
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 07:30 PM
1

Exactly, there is emotion involved in standard run of the mill prostitution. I'm not sure what you mean by love? Love is not involved in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 02:54 PM
1

This is not necessarily true. You are saying if there is no exchange of emotions (as women say, they can have meaningless sex) then it's classified as prostitution right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 02:07 PM
1

So ChatGPT told you she was posing for the male gaze? ETA - see the thing with AI is shitty prompt, shitty answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:34 PM
1

Well, the one you said in your post was posting for the male gaze...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:02 PM
1

Can you prove she's "posing for male gaze"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:13 PM
1

Wrong. This dating app is serving as a menu for women to experience the toxic men they claim they dislike. This is simply increasing the popularity of so called "bad" men because women will 1. think they can change him or 2. they actually enjoy the toxicity if he has a big enough dick, has a large enough bank account, is tall enough or has the looks. Normal men were never part of the conversation. Women want men who other women want. Watch what they do, not what they say. This app will quickly d…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 08:46 PM
1

And how is one supposed to know a therapist is using "evidence based practices" as a lay person?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 04:49 PM
1

Sort of like "be yourself bro", "get a better personality" that's touted around here by the blues?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:04 PM
1

Psychology and therapy are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:03 PM
0

Psychology and therapy are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:00 PM
2

No. This is wrong. Doctors have tests to verify things.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:55 PM
0

Apologies - put under the wrong post. But a grift indeed. Women rebelled over their medical doctors calling them fat, they certainly are going to rebel over any therapy that isn't a feel good personal human vibrator they can go to once a week. The problem with therapy as practiced generally is a bunch of "therapists" are not really therapists at all - they're professional cheerleaders with worthless training/degrees who believe they can address all issues - even those they were never trained to …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:44 PM
-3

100% agree. Women rebelled over their medical doctors calling them fat, they certainly are going to rebel over any therapy that isn't a feel good personal human vibrator they can go to once a week. The problem with therapy as practiced generally is a bunch of "therapists" are not really therapists at all - they're professional cheerleaders with worthless training/degrees who believe they can address all issues - even those they were never trained to address. The part I most enjoy hearing and lau…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:37 PM
1

Stop it. The investigation into Adams started way before there was a migrant crisis in NYC. You clearly never read the evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 12:56 PM
1

Who are the top 100 OF earners? Name them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 10:45 AM
8

What's the point of this when he just got married again, to a woman that's like a 4 in the face.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 10:42 AM

Then why are so many deadbeat fathers repeat offenders with multiple women?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:47 PM

They look at the man who had three kids who he doesn't see or pay for, then choose to have his child because they have an inflated sense of self, they are different. Then they say he's a deadbeat and could he do this to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:30 PM

Yes it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:28 PM
1

What? So why did early legislatures not want the unwashed masses voting, so they chose representation directly to Congress?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 11:28 AM
1

So include women in the draft. Problem solved. It breaks the logic chain.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 11:26 AM
4

But yet in all these spaces, it's only discussed with respect to women. It is blind to men. I dare you find a widely accepted piece that quotes emotional labor with respect to men or recognizes the "emotional labor" they must do in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:00 PM
4

By who exactly? By people who threw the kitchen sink into a term that tries to define every grievance. There's not even a questioning of whether the concept of "emotional labor" exists in a relationship. Logically, it doesn't. It's allowed mostly women to devalue any labor that their partners go through (for example, the "emotional labor" of financially providing for a family that men go through and keeping up with unreasonable spending habits of their partners) to prioritize their own grievance…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:16 PM
4

That's because they tried to ram a term that had absolutely nothing to do with relationships into their relationships and home lives. Even the sociologists who created the term has criticized the extension of its use in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:02 PM
-2

It's also wrongly applied. At least use the actual definition. It's about suppressing or ignoring one's own emotion, not about managing others emotions. So if you are suppressing and not expressing how you truly feel at home just so things go nicely, that's the labor, the active suppression. But the workplace is more pernicious because one's income is tied to doing so. At home, the stakes are different, which is why it's a ridiculous term. If you want to say you don't want to manage other's emot…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:59 PM
6

Emotional labor was about additional labor required in the workplace, especially hospitality and service industries. It was never meant to cover the home. And even if you want to ridiculously extend to the home, which has serious problems, it's about suppressing or faking emotion, it's not about taking care of the emotions of others. It's not about actual external labor. That's just a perverse definition to extend victimhood where none exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:52 PM
4

They'd blame it on the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:53 PM
-1

Yes, life is not fair. Women get magnitudes of more attention when they are younger vs when they are older. Men have to work on their value to be "worthy". Men are called broke while pretty women who situated similarly financially are referred to as the "prize". Women die older, men die younger. Eggs stop ovulating while sperm get generated for longer. So yes, all of the advantages you get when you're younger expire. All of the disadvantages as a man disappear as you get older, you just don't ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 01:59 PM
1

She's recreational use only. Not sure why you're taking this person seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 12:39 PM
1

Don't worry about why. Just pump and dump. Is recreational use only.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 12:37 PM
1

I'm cleaner, clean better and more organized than all the women I've dated. It's a myth that women are cleaner/neater.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 06:54 PM
1

That would be just fine. 30 days in jail, community service, etc. People here are acting like it's the end of their life if the get a sentence. Anything to excuse this abhorrent behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:34 AM
3

It really is disgusting using a child as a shield for fraudulent behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 12:37 AM
2

Cheating isn't a crime. Fraud is. For purposes of calculating damages, that is a reasonable proxy. No court can force you to go to work and share your paycheck with your wife. On the other hand, a court can compel child support regardless of whether you work or not. That's the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 09:41 PM
3

Again, disagree. One can reasonably assume that had the fraud not been committed, the father would have divorced, had he known the truth at the time, if he decides to divorce at the time. We can then infer the same fraud as he would not have been responsible. Any calculation of child support would then be backdated to the first instance in the fraud (conception) as what it would have been in that instance and restitution made.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 09:04 PM
4

They need to figure it out. Simple way to avoid this is to not engage in the fraud to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 07:35 PM
5

Damn right. Fucking kid living on easy street through the proceeds of a fraud. If she was the mastermind of a Ponzi scheme and used all the money to give her kid a great life, no one here would blink an eye snatching the ill gotten gains from their grubby little hands. Run me my fucking coins.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 06:16 PM
9

It's in the best interest of justice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 06:09 PM
6

The jail sentence will end. Just because you go to jail doesn't mean you earn zero forever. What kind of logic is this? Yes, it's a good outcome. He will receive restitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 06:06 PM
6

Fuck them kids. She committed fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:57 PM
2

what do you think should be done to make men whole in cases where a woman has little to no assets and the state incarcerates her and she will not be capable of even beginning repayment for several years? the man is just fucked? She will begin her restitution when she gets out of jail. There are lots of programs that deal with this already. It's not new.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:54 PM
8

Deterrence.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:51 PM
3

How is it not intentional deception when you've let another man ejaculate in you unprotected, don't have clear guidance on who the father is, then say for a fact it is a person who is in fact not the father? Are they unaware that they had unprotected sex with another man?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:44 PM
7

The biological dad did not force the wrongly accused to pay. How hard is it for a woman to say "I fucked another man/other men and this child may not be yours"? Problem solved. You're implying that the biological father has actual knowledge that the woman has his child. Everyone is running around here saying men should operate on "trust me bro, I'm your wife/gf/etc" and now she wrongly accuses a man and drains his resources and your saying the bio dad, who may not even know he has a child, shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 04:27 PM
9

You don't get the idea of chained lawsuits. She needs to get the recovery from the father. The wrongly accused has a cause of action against the person who caused him harm. The biological father never claimed the wrongly accused was the father. It was the mother of the child. If she wants to recover funds she received to take care of her child, she can recover from the biological father, assuming she knows who he is. That's her burden, not the wrongly accused. If you sold me something based on a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 04:12 PM
11

And she can sue for that. Her crime, which she benefits from (especially more if the wrongly accused has a higher income) is falsely and fraudulently assigning paternity to the wrong person which she should not have done.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:11 PM
3

Sure. Is this the norm in fraud cases? Bernie Madoff went to prison. Are you arguing an injustice there?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:15 PM
3

How exactly are all women being punished for the actions of a few in the case of paternity?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:15 PM
5

Which is the case in a lot of crimes that are committed. You think a single mother who murders someone, assaults someone or engages in embezzlement shouldn't face any consequences because "there's a child in that that needs to go somewhere"?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:14 PM
3

Then why are you deflecting by bringing up an example of someone who got away with fraud?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:12 PM
3

I'm more interested in justice, not some nebulous "peace".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:11 PM
17

Dollars are fungible. She indirectly benefits from the fraud by reducing her financial obligations and fraudulently imposing them on another person. The fraud originated from her intentional misrepresentation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:07 PM
2

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:05 PM
9

The majority of men aren't rapist either so I guess by your logic, we shouldn't strengthen any laws pertaining to that either.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:03 PM
6

Why is that anyone's problem except the criminal who engaged in fraud? "Oh no! It's so burdensome! It's tough to get a job" so don't engage in fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 01:59 PM
5

Because the child is innocent and didn’t scam you. They loved you because they grew up thinking of you as their father. You spent years raising this kid with your own values and tucking them in and holding them while they fell asleep. I don't know whose heart strings you think you're pulling by saying "but what about the children?!". The child isn't going to jail. The fraudster is. Children don't choose to have murderers, rapists, fraudsters, etc as parents. But the parent still goes to jail if …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 01:57 PM
3

This is not a serious response. Arguing no one should go to jail for murder because here's one person who got away with it is not a winning argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 01:47 PM
2

i do think jail is way overused for civil, non-violent matters. i think sending a woman to jail, a child going into the system, and the man getting no money because she’s making $1/day in jail sounds like possibly the worst outcome for society in these cases. getting absolutely nothing is not the outcome i wish for men in this situation. Completely disagree here. Jail is part of the sentence. Restitution is the other. No reason why this would be treated differently than any other crime of fraud.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:59 PM
7

What's your point with this statement? Of course you do. But you can face jail time if you don't pay child support. How far is this to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:36 PM
2

paternity fraud is different than regular fraud. there is an innocent child at play, and a father who may or may not wish to continue a parental relationship. i think restitution to the victims here is more important than punishment to the perpetrator. So parents who commit tax fraud shouldn't go to jail if there are innocent children in the house? Explain this logic and cite a case where the existence of innocent children ended a prosecution or impacted a verdict. If a man (not father since he'…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:35 PM
6

Again, this post is addressing criminal action. That doesn't exist although it does for other fraud. It exists for failure to pay child support as well (contempt of court).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:16 PM
8

But there are consequences, up to and including jail time. Loss of driving privileges, loss of passport, wage garnishment, the list goes on. There is no punishment for paternity fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:10 PM
3

They can serve their jail time and pay restitution. This is common. It's a little ridiculous to say you shouldn't serve your punishment because it will be a taxpayer burden. No other case of fraud works like that. Sounds like you want a special carveout for women. Did you think the same for Bernie Madoff's fraud? the man cannot be made monetarily whole by someone who earns nothing. Yes, he can. Again, this is done all the time in fraud cases. Asset forfeiture, wage garnishment, etc. After they'v…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:09 PM
4

I'm not sure where you've read that cheating is a crime. No one is suggesting that. Fraudulently ascribing paternity to the wrong person should be a crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:52 AM
4

If you committed any type of fraud, you'd go to jail. Your child would suffer then as well. Are you suggesting that if a parent were to commit a fraud (say embezzlement, tax evasion or a Ponzi scheme) that they shouldn't go to jail because they have children? That's very strange that you think parents now should have a defense against committing fraud that their children would suffer. But judging from OP, I guess some men really don’t care about kids much They are being scammed. Why would they c…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:50 AM
7

They do. There's jail time associated with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:44 AM
6

Completely disagree with this. There are lots of crimes that come with penalties where money cannot make the person whole (wrongful death as an example), yet we still have remedies. It didn't mean men are robotic; it means that that is the only remedy available at law. So yes, there should be restitution, pain and suffering and jail time for fraudulent behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:43 AM

Emotional intelligence doesn't factor for the UbërChad. It's a buzz word to explain away the unattractive/average ones. If you don't serve as an emotional tampon to her, you're emotionally unintelligent. As Chad or Chad adjacent, you can do all the fuck boy stuff. They get a pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:45 PM
8

Advancements in science, the increase in life expectancy and general increase in standard of living is also due to the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 07:36 PM
0

You wouldn't be able to tell 5'11" and 6'0" apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 11:49 PM
6

If this is the video you wanted to use to make a point, you failed miserably. You're literally advocating for childlike behavior. You're an adult responsible for how you act, point blank.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:27 AM
1

Same thing. Custody is in relation to the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:04 AM
1

So, are you seriously saying "standard of the marriage" is not measured via combining the income together as a starting point? I have experience in this area.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 02:35 AM
1

Child support is a different matter. That money belongs to the children, so that is your responsibility in relation to the children.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 02:29 AM
1

No one is saying there are no other considerations. Not sure why you're stuck on this point. But maintaining the marital standard of living is a major factor. And discretion from the judge makes it quite subjective at the end of the day. My personal belief is you return to the position you were pre marriage, adjusted for the children.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 02:27 AM
2

Which legislation? You understand divorce laws differ state by state right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 01:38 AM
4

I'd have to agree with maintaining the "lifestyle which one is accustomed to" is a terrible standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 01:39 PM
4

It's the only quantifiable thing, unless you have some ideas how to qualify and validate the other things. Would love to hear them if you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 01:37 PM

Taken to its logical conclusion, those men will die off. As I said, anyone can say anything. It's for attention. People already have the tools to extricate such thinking from their own lives, so why give it attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 03:05 PM

So that thinking doesn't last long does it? Even if it's aspirational, it runs into the reality of divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 03:00 PM

How many people in your life are property of their husbands?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 02:46 PM

It's extreme for liberals not to conservatives. Please adjust what you're trying to say here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 04:05 PM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 02:21 AM
2

Yup. So, not a refugee.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 12:43 AM
2

Not the definition of a refugee.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 12:00 AM
3

Move to NY, CA or IL.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 11:48 PM
6

Lol. Good luck. You'll see women trot out these same statistics to show men are not worthy of them but then turn around and claim they continue to be oppressed by the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 11:47 PM
11

My opinion is by giving these comments/viewpoints the light of day and oxygen, you elevate them and give them more worth than they deserve. These comments thrive on shock value and in a world where attention is currency, in order to get said attention (by people like you), it gets increasingly extreme in order to capture your eyeballs. This rhetoric only thrives on attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 08:41 PM
3

They oppose the idea of a draft. When it actually happens, most stay quiet.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:49 PM
1

Wonderful argument you made there.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:36 PM
1

The greatest resource transfer between men and women has happened under the guise of divorce. It is one of the most predatory legal constructs that exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:22 PM
3

Great. Would love to see it eliminated entirely. The issue is, people use it when it benefits their argument or their bias in a particular topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:12 PM
1

Just like divorce, one of the most predatory things that exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:55 PM
3

Wonderful, so we can retire the women mature faster myth?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:53 PM

It is disconnected. You sleep with an attractive person because they're attractive. Whether they give you an orgasm or not is a gamble. As you said, you hope. But you act like women being horny for guys who don't give them orgasms is some new discovery. You don't "hope" you get erect for someone. That's the difference. You do or you don't. A woman doesn't hope they're horny for a guy. They either are or they aren't. They are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:47 PM

It is disconnected. You sleep with an attractive person because they're attractive. Whether they give you an orgasm or not is a gamble. As you said, you hope. But you act like women being horny for guys who don't give them orgasms is some new discovery. You don't "hope" you get erect for someone. That's the difference. You do or you don't. A woman doesn't hope they're horny for a guy. They either are or they aren't. They are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:47 PM

You wrote: Men certainly aren’t deliberately hooking up with women they don’t get erect for. Nor are women. You're changing your argument. Your comparison of being erect and a woman having an orgasm is just plain wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:34 PM

In your statement, if someone wrote women aren't sleeping with men they don't have orgasms with, that would be really dumb. Women do get horny or wet for certain men. That's the equivalent. ETA: and you clearly haven't heard of men going soft during sex because the woman is terrible in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:27 PM

What? Being erect and having an orgasm are two very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:24 PM
5

Link your study.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 01:54 PM
1

It actually doesn't reinforce anything. Men need to focus on their happiness and do what makes them happy. Wealthy people take their own lives. A longer life span doesn't mean a better life. More responsible, that's a view from others and it means in service to others - men should focus on what makes them and not what benefits others. Engage in less risky behaviors, again, what benefits others, not what makes men happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 01:56 AM
-2

Life satisfaction and happiness are not the same. English is hard for some of you. I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 01:48 AM
0

Funny it doesn't say happier. Focus on your happiness. That is all that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:31 AM
9

Did the husband not provide the wife with sex? I'm confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 10:51 PM
25

Disagree. Having forced sex is ridiculous under any circumstance and would be contrary to public policy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 10:43 PM

Woah. Didn't know you knew what I cared about. So on one hand, you write why men should care but then turn around and proclaim, you don't care. Make up your mind. The need to be right makes you sound crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 11:17 AM
2

Ah, so you don't think those women didn't really give a fuck about women's rights but were doing it to say fuck you to men in a fit if lonely woman rage. I think your brain is pretty fucked to try to explain or reason through anything. But I'm just an observer of your tortured logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 01:48 AM
2

What action did I ascribe to them? I'd like to tease that out a little more.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 01:30 AM
2

You think the 4B movement is "made up"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:25 PM
6

Likewise for the 4B movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:05 PM
0

We care because women care. That's the point. No, it wouldn't. In theory, men would just make more. Women are the ones who argued it was a zero sum game.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:24 PM
2

No it doesn't. Men are the ones being told to tackle the pay gap. The fact that it's essentially zero tells you men had to care about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:15 PM
3

Pay gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:06 PM
1

They scream like banshees about revenge fantasies when they are the primary purveyors of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:35 AM
5

They're using the same statistics that they responded to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:33 AM
2

Would it be fair for those men to act like women who can't get a man today and complain? Seems egalitarian to me, unless you believe women should have a special pass to bitch and complain while men should shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:31 AM
3

Talking about problems incessantly but not wanting to solve those problems. The joy is in the complaining, not the solution. If they have nothing to complain about, it's like a ship lost at sea.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 03:34 PM
3

You have no point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:01 PM
3

You don't think women complain about emotionally unavailable men in real life? You think that's a revenge fantasy?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:42 PM
4

Yes - you think a person to split expenses with is a feature of a bangmaid, not an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:41 PM
3

Then what do you think is the obnoxious therapy speak that women use when they are on some guys roster? You don't think labeling a guy emotionally unavailable is a complaint?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:40 PM
3

I'm sorry, this is pathetic. What details in particular? An entire sub of women who weren't intelligent enough to know they wanted to get married and that their partners dragging their feet was indicative of them not wanting the same? You're the one consuming these echo chambers for your own fantasies. What percentage of the population do these women represent exactly since you've consumed it all?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:39 PM
7

More like, stop complaining when they don't want to be with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:23 PM
5

You described it, pretty succinctly. I don't need to read women complaining on the Internet about their choices. You describe men as dragging their feet on marriage as emotionally unavailable. If marriage was important to them, they'd find people who'd want to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:20 PM
11

Maybe it's time to look in the mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:18 PM
5

You folks come up with the most ridiculous terms. A woman being an adult now means she's a bangmaid ?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:17 PM
2

Emotionally unavailable does not mean not wanting to get married. That's ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:15 PM
-1

Why would you let your girlfriend stop you from finding the love of your life?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 11:15 PM
2

How attractive is Sally?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:34 AM
1

Women don't realize it's a swamp because they are in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:19 AM
5

If women don't want to have babies, why are they having them. No one is forcing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:12 AM
2

This has nothing to do with people carrying their weight. It has everything to do with materialism. If you can't tell the difference, might be why you're single.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 01:19 AM
2

Of course you woman would discount men for materialistic reasons. We already know that. Thanks for saying it out loud.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 12:09 AM
2

Here we go. Part of the women are never wrong crew
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 11:45 PM
0

of course this would be deleted by the mods although it rebuts the initial claim of the post - the point is they are lying Of course. The woman in the post you linked said it perfectly. Size never mattered° with her partners, but her ex was huge, while her current boyfriend is small. It's virtue signaling because they can't be seen body shaming, they have a reputation to uphold. But in the back of their minds, you're inadequate. ° - Unless you meet the minimum size requirement
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 02:48 PM

Because women are even more homophobic than men are. Rules for thee, not for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 02:04 PM

Of course. The woman in the post you linked said it perfectly. Size never mattered° with her partners, but her ex was huge, while her current boyfriend is small. It's cute signaling because they can't be seen body shaming, they have a reputation to uphold. But in the back of their minds, you're inadequate. ° - Unless you meet the minimum size requirement
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:25 AM
5

Sure. There's the example of when women cheat on their spouses. Cheating Is Now Being Described as a Feminist Act of Self-Care "She was interviewed by Bustle in an article entitled "When Having An Affair Is An Act Of Self-Care," which claimed that infidelity can actually be a feminist act of empowerment for women. In some of Piazza's interviews, the women gave various reasons for their affairs: they were unhappy and not sexually satisfied by their husband, they were unfulfilled during the Covid …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 07:48 PM
4

Those are called simps or the male orbiters who seek out crumbs of pussy wherever they go. This is a core belief of the sisterhood. That there are certain men who internalize it doesn't change that fact. Stop centering men in this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 03:56 PM
16

If a woman does something that is clearly wrong, blame a man, blame the patriarchy or blame society. A woman is never responsible for her own actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 03:36 PM
0

And when the UbërChad comes along...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 02:03 AM
2

You don't need a course to go to the gym, excel at work or be social.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:24 PM
1

the physical experience of sex is the discussion, not "happiness". part of being responsible for my own "happiness" is having a partner who is good in bed
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:15 PM
3

Are you reading the thread or just making stuff up. The person three posts above said women don't judge those men. You gotta try reading sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 05:04 PM
-1

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 04:59 PM
-3

Now you get it! So happy how it took you one paragraph to contradict yourself and get the actual point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 04:16 PM
-1

She doesn't. It's pure virtue signaling painting women in the reasonable, perfect light. "Of course we don't judge" they proclaim, while the reality tells a different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:34 PM
-2

I want you to read your own response. Desirable and good, aka being happy with the sex you're having, is your responsibility. Stop relying on others to do that for you. Sounds lazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:31 PM
-2

What kind of monster uses a woman he cares about for his sole sexual gratification when he can do it himself? One who's paying for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:47 PM
-1

I don't know what this is supposed to mean in the context of my response. It's sort of self evident by my statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:43 PM
0

You're responsible for your own happiness
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:16 PM
2

Where exactly did you read the word feminist?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:51 AM
-2

Ah yes, yet again, women are never responsible for the choices they make.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:57 AM
3

You said you wouldn't advise them in the first place, so I'm not sure why you're saying it's up to them to decide. You wouldn't get to the deciding part in the first place because you wouldn't say anything. I didn't say I expected them to do anything. That's you adding additional things that weren't written in my response. I asked you how would you advise someone. And you said you wouldn't because that's their preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:52 AM
2

Meaning you wouldn't advise this wayward person of reality when they hold unrealistic expectations. You don't advise friends or others when they're about to do something foolish, you just call it their "preference". I completely understand how you approach those around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:42 AM
2

So you would tell them nothing and have them go on their way? Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:38 AM
2

It's not a matter of "fighting my battle", it's a matter of consistency & intellectual honesty. Either you have a problem with a particular argument, or you simply don't. It can't be both, that's too convenient. Again, you want me to respond to others comments. Rather than focusing on the question you asked and the answer you got from me, you deflect to another comment that wasn't yours. What does that have to do with me exactly? Nothing, that's the answer. Or just say you're being disingenuous …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 09:29 PM
2

No, I literally responded to your comment. Now you want me to fight your battle with every other person you're engaging with? It's not cherry picking. It's literally responding to your top level comment. Do you not know how this works?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:26 PM
3

So you would counsel a high school dropout with no work experience who was holding out for a job that paid 1,000,000 per year to stick with their preferences? How would you counsel such a person?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:23 PM
2

Why are you telling me someone else's argument when I directly responded to your comment. If you have any response to my comment, I'm willing to engage.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:13 PM
1

Women want men who other women want. That simple. Regardless of what people may say here, the men they attract continue to be one of the most powerful barometers of their attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:10 PM
7

She's younger, and therefore not a mature adult, even though feminists love spreading the propaganda that women "mature faster". That's the funny part. "Women are more mature" but then turn around and say "she didn't know what she was doing". It's ridiculous. Guess she risks losing out on her human right of being a gold-digger. Correct. I wish these women would call a spade a spade. They want her to walk away with 50 million because girl power and that's it. If she's old enough to be an internet…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:08 PM
-2

Emotional cheating is whatever is making that other person insecure at the time. It's so vaguely defined that anything falls under the definition. Remember, the same people who champion this idea of "emotional cheating" in one breath will turn around and tell you that no relationship can fulfill all your needs and you need to retain your other relationships. It's a catch-22. You can never win. The goalposts will move to where they need to to accuse you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:59 PM
4

Name the power imbalance.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:58 PM
1

So are you saying 19 year old men in college who rape women are not responsible for their actions because of their prefrontal cortex?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:51 PM
2

There was no relationship. It was sex. So your question is why seek sex with a younger woman? Maybe they are better at it, much like you would choose a 19 year old basketball player other a 54 year old one.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:36 PM
16

Please tell me how her prefrontal cortex is developed enough to file a lawsuit for 50 million dollars, but not developed enough to engage in consensual sex with a popular media figure?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:29 PM
7

She's old enough to know what baby gravy is and how babies are made, but of course her prefrontal cortex is all fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:27 PM
4

Enough to have applied to college, gotten in, understood my financial aid package, chosen a major, worked a few internships, be responsible for my academic work and overall life on a college campus, and not engage in kinky rough sex. That's how intelligent I was.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:26 PM
7

Exactly. They run around screaming "sleep with them all sis", "have your hoe phase", and other such ridiculous platitudes. But when they go and do that, all of a sudden, they are victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:16 PM
4

Then they should contact the police when a crime has occurred. Not sue for 50 million.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:34 PM
5

Have you considered that she also may have consented? Do you not think 50 million dollars is sufficient incentive to say something you consented to wasn't in fact consent? What's strange with some of the responses here is that she's too young and her prefrontal cortex is not developed enough but it is developed enough to sue someone for 50 million dollars?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:33 PM
5

You don't know that and you don't know her. I don't know how you people dismiss stuff and substitute your own narratives for a situation you know nothing about. You folks love infantilizing women when it fits your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:25 PM
9

He holds all the cards, and that creates a situation where he could easily exploit his position. What position does he hold exactly that he is exploiting? Does he employ her? Does he control any stream of revenues that she relies on?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:54 PM
7

Most 19 year olds aren't online Onlyfan models.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:50 PM
4

It's not a criminal case (for a reason I would say - if he committed a crime, adjudicate it through the courts). It's purposely civil so the lower "more likely than not" standard holds and she can get a pay day. Also, it's not really innocent until proven guilty. More like not guilty until proven guilty.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:50 PM
5

When you send text messages saying you want someone to put their "big black baby" inside you, yes, that may constitute as crazy and not a victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:47 PM
9

This is the only thing
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:45 PM

Show evidence they funded the creation of the show.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 03:06 AM

Ya love making stuff up and calling everything else a psy-op. It's funny actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:43 AM

“The government spent £3.4m funding its promotion and likely its creation through an NGO called Tender.” They funded the promotion because they think all parents and students should see it. That's after the fact. There's no evidence except this guy saying "likely funded its creation." A cursory search of the involvement would clear this up. https://tender.org.uk/tender-joins-efforts-to-bring-adolescence-to-all-uk-secondary-schools/ Why would Tender join efforts to show a series in that they crea…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:11 AM

Order of operations is all wrong. And you completely made up that it was "funded in part by the government". In fact, the chi creator of the show implored the UK government to keep funding to the BBC and publicly funded stations saying it was not up to Netflix to fill the gap if public interest shows. But addressing your psy-op point - are you saying the increase in teen boys stabbing teen girls in the UK wasn't real? The government is recognizing loners, etc... that may be a threat, identifying…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:08 AM

So it's a psy-op unless it agrees with your preconceived belief? That's strange.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 10:39 PM
5

It allows them to say they owned the libs.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 10:59 PM
1

How is this a racially charged comment when it's in fact what this administration is doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 11:17 PM
1

I'm sure you're the believer that highlighting Jackie Robinson's contributions to the military is DEI that doesn't hold up to the same "standards" of white people who fought?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 12:05 AM
-7

You have no idea what DEI is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 11:04 PM
-1

In study after study, in group violence is a greater threat than out group violence. Explain why gender should be different.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 02:41 AM
0

And no other sex hates women more than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 01:11 AM
7

A common saying whenever i have argued with women on tt and reddit Your first mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 09:58 PM
0

Never wrote that. But they clearly went to where the successful men were, infiltrating their spaces for their ultimate goal: SAHW.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 08:13 PM
1

Looking for a husband so they can stay at home
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 12:35 PM
0

The vast majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 12:33 PM
3

Your data set has 2.1mm total women. 1.6mm are listed as unmarried, no partner households. 1.4mn are listed as never married. If you look at the unmarried, no partner, 1.6/2 = 80%. You're double counting somewhere because 50% doesn't make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:20 PM
3

You may want to do your math again.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:43 PM
2

Is this counting older women who were likely to be married earlier?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:07 AM
4

Or even simpler - women should approach and stop using those dumb signals.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:06 AM
7

And men should not approach them. This is what they asked for. Didn't buy into their feelings
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:02 AM
3

Remember that even the accusation is sufficient to ruin you. No one ever says you're innocent. They only say there's not enough evidence to charge you, always keeping the cloud of suspicion over you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:58 AM
5

Why would they admit defeat in real life?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:52 AM
3

This is an excellent development. This is what women wanted and finally women are being made to be safe in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 02:48 AM
2

Why do folks keep asking this question when they know they will getting a bunch of gaslight type answers?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 10:32 PM
5

I have multiple mental illnesses and PMDD. Even just ovulation hormones affect my mental health. And this is the reason you should probably stay off the Internet and not worry about what strangers are writing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 06:58 PM
0

So he doesn't care "a lot" about your income. Rather, how about you define eggs "a lot" is? An example - I care a lot that my girlfriend is not abusive. I'm not going to accept abuse, temporarily, for 3 months. We just won't be together. So if he cares a lot about your income, what you're saying is there's a limit to your unemployment, that he'll break up with you, even if the job market is terrible? Of course, there are limits. He'd almost certainly break up with me if I decided to be a "homema…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 04:27 PM
0

Everyone thinks they're normal and everyone else isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 03:02 PM
1

The underlying assumption is because men feel worse about themselves, it must be from intimidation. That's what you wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:10 PM
1

So he would break up with you if you lost your income?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:07 PM
2

Yes, women spend money to acquire what others want (an artificial look of beauty) What they think others (who they want) want. You folks never seem to acknowledge personal choice. It's always somebody else's fault that you make the choices you do. Men spend money on themselves to acquire what they want (a fake image of a womanz0. No they don't. They spend it on women because that's what women typically demand they do. Saying a coffee date isn't shit because it's "low effort" as an example. Nice …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:04 PM
1

If they actually cared, they wouldn't have dated you in the first place. It was likely the women in their family who cared.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:00 PM
1

Actually men tend to feel worse about themselves when their female partners are successful so there is some factual basis for the “men feel intimidated by successful women” trope. You guys love this intimidation trope. It could never be that the woman is an asshole and verbally abused him because she thinks she's better than him since she makes more money. Ah, but have a man make more money and all of a sudden, he's controlling and abusive. You guys don't even pretend to hide your women are wond…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:54 PM
2

In comfortable and/or functional clothing men and women's bodies do not look very different. Only a small portion of women naturally have the large breasts that fascinate men so much and those women usually have some fat on them. What? Please take a biology class. This is unhinged. Healthy weight is whatever it takes to not be tortured by hunger pains continually. It's plumper than most men want (i.e., usually size 12 and up). Ok, you should have just said fat because that's what you're trying t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:52 PM
1

I'm glad you can tell the difference. One spends it on others, one spends it on themselves. Now you got it!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:49 PM
2

Surprise in our natural states (no make-up, comfortable clothes, easy to manage hair, healthy weight as opposed to starving, etc.), women and men look more or less the same. So what you are saying is that heterosexual men are not attracted to normal women only to an artificial image. No you don't. Men's and women's bodies are very different. What a ridiculous statement. Men generally do not have large breast. Men tend to be larger and more muscular. Is "healthy weight' your way of saying fat?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:43 PM
2

Women have to spend incredible amounts of money and time to conform to the beauty ideals men want. No. Women spend incredible amounts of money to conform to the beauty ideals of the men they want. Again, you do it for yourself. A lot of men make comments about how unattractive (butch masculine) lesbian women look to them. Surprise. Heterosexual men are not attracted to men-like persons.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:24 PM
1

After BLM, in some cities, police are no longer wanted. Isn’t it valid to ask “why is the legitimacy of an institution important” in situations like that? Sure, it's a valid question but we operate in a democracy, so we already have the answer. Those asking whether police were legitimate were a minority of the population. Don't let popular culture and the flavor of the day rot your brain. ACAB and Defund the police are conversations centered around delegitimizing the police. Who cares. Also, fuc…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 10:44 AM
0

Do you ask this of the courts and do you ask the same of the police and firefighters? You think anyone should just be able to imprison someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 11:02 PM
1

You're mixing up two different arguments (I don't know if on purpose) and combining them to criticize an argument of your own making. No where in this post does it say marrying someone with a vapid job is somehow illegitimate. It clearly says jobs have been increasingly developed with no benefits to society and it's among that vein and thinking that people view marriages with the same vapidness that they reward empty calorie jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 10:58 PM
0

This is marriage vs wedding. Effectively, judging a presidency by the inauguration. They are not the same. That being said, it seems many women want the latter while not being prepared for the rights of the former, hence the high rates of failures in the institution. The public show takes on more importance.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 10:48 PM
-3

and there wouldn't be so many women with a boyfriend/husband and a male best friend who they know fucked longer than their husband/boyfriend. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 10:41 PM
0

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:08 AM
8

I didn't ask whether it moved you, I was pointing out that you acted as though it affected both parents yet the scenario is specifically predicated on it disproportionately affecting women and children. Again, if the parents cared about their children, they would forage and hunt. Why should I care more than them about their own offspring? I see, so women and children suffer just because? No, so folks don't take for granted who keeps the world going.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:29 AM
0

Except, as you already noted, it's actually the mother who has to sacrifice for a hungry child, and it is the child who suffers. This doesn't move me. Lots of children have died. How does that affect the dating market, though? I don't know, but it will definitely shift decision making.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:13 AM
0

A free, raw, unadulterated market. We can see how folks truly operate when the spigot of cash is turned off and they truly must make their own way. If kids go hungry, who cares. Their parents should think of that before giving birth. The parents should go out into nature to procure food just like folks in the past did.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:30 AM
1

Meaning turning off the spigot of welfare and social supports.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:25 AM

Women are the ones who are extremely homophobic. Their number one insult to men they don't agree with is to call them gay as an insult. That stems from a deep hatred of men of all types, misandry that crosses sexual orientation. The hilarious thing about it is they use gay men as accessories and entertainment. But once you see their ire, their true colors will come out, and they will throw being gay around as an insult quite easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:10 AM
1

What is the difference? What is the difference between women who dropped out of school in the US vs those in other countries?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 11:13 AM
2

And regular women who parrot those same words.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:19 PM
1

At least you can admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:18 PM
5

Yes they are. You are screaming "men ain't shit". Has the misandry against men in your own country all of the sudden gone away because it's so ingrained in you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:14 PM
0

I mean you're a colonialist...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:11 PM
3

OP will never address this because American exceptionalism and their natalist nationalist thinking means that by virtue of being American, you are better and more powerful.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:00 PM

Not interested in putting my penis where shit has been.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:01 PM
1

So you do care, even someone as intelligent as you say you are, and you understand limits. But you've originally questioned how these limits can exist if one is intelligent. You gotta make it make sense. If everything is on the table and it shouldn't impact how one feels about high n-count people, then one would assume you would have no problem with this above scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:26 PM
2

I’m also not gay so that kind of limits what i’d want her doing with men. What does her having a train run in her by 15 guys connect to you being gay? This makes no sense that this would limit what you want your partner doing with other men. Are you saying her sleeping with 15 guys means you're sleeping with 15 guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:09 PM
2

I don’t really understand why people combine those things and the sex together. Sex is the physical stuff, love is all the other stuff and more… You don't think sex has a psychological aspect to it? "Sex is the physical stuff" would imply that people can just have sex without arousal. You're just doing work after all. No normal person has the definition of sex as just the physical stuff. It's been recognized that sex has various aspects to it. If you want to define it strictly as when a penis en…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:53 PM
2

So an hour after 15 guys (known to her) have run a train on her, you'd be perfectly fine with kissing her and being intimate?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:35 PM
1

Sure doesn't sound like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:32 PM
2

I'll put it more succinctly - people, esp women, generally don't want to feel used for sex despite how good it may be.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:26 PM
2

As in sex is more than the act. It involves foreplay, it involves how one is treated afterwards. Good sex can be remembered as bad sex if the person is left alone in a bad emotional state. How about talking to women about the various components - like if someone had sex with them, then immediately left without a word and ghosted them, would they believe all sex is good sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:23 PM
1

Lol, ok... this only happens in porn and there aren't people who don't give a shit about the person they are having sex with and have their sex acts reflect porn. Go talk to human beings for once.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:09 PM
3

This is you right? How does love make the sex better. You're defining sex as the act and nothing more. What happens before and after doesn't matter to you. If you think love doesn't imply care and having repeated sex with people who don't give a damn about you doesn't matter because it's all the same, go right on ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:08 PM
2

How long have you been waiting to write this?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:14 AM
6

Ah yes, someone taking you to poundtown and nutting on your face, then putting their pants on and leaving 2 minutes after it happened is the same as being in a committed relationship where the person actually gives a damn how you feel/are afterwards. That's exactly the same and the relationship doesn't make a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:12 AM
1

These men are the most annoying. They stand for nothing thus they fall for anything. Whenever the winds are blowing with the trendiest women's trend du jour, they will follow along because they are generally spineless individuals. They scrape for crumbs of pussy whether they can find it. Remember, those who are in that NLOBs don't claim it as a badge of honor. Others will determine that without you saying much.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:12 PM

As if these are the only afflictions available. Next time, focus on what's said and not what you're wrongly inferring.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:08 PM

I like the part where you believe that simply wanting to have children means that someone will be a good parent who won’t potentially damage their kids. Where was this said exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:34 PM

Please be serious. Children are absolutely forced to participate, and told it is their obligation to have children. Is it your argument that how we're raised has no influence on how we behave? Sure it does, but every adult has the right to make their own decisions. At some point, you're responsible for your life and can't keep blaming everyone else. You know very well I'm not talking about what they personally do, I'm talking about what they keep trying to tell and make other women do. My argume…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:34 PM

Not now in the Western world. Throughout time and space? Yes, we were. Largely due to religious codification of this coercion. Free will and free choice are parts of religion. No one is forced to participate in religion. Again, when you give women the choice, and - this is key here - the ability to avoid it - many women opt-out. The birth rates reflect this accordingly. Good. If we truly wanted it, then men wouldn't have to beat us over the head about it being our "duty" and "the economy" and "m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 03:33 AM
1

Ultimatums aren't choices. They are demands.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 03:10 AM

It's not new-found neuroticism to not want kids. If it was so natural for women to have kids then we wouldn't need to be coerced into having them. Women aren't coerced into having kids. Women have multiple forms of birth control. Women go to sperm banks on their own. Women have the babies of men they don't even me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 03:08 AM
-2

This is true. Why would we even want people who don't want children having children. This new found neuroticism can end in a generation or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:54 PM
5

You really have to realize how asinine this comment is. Saying "if you don't propose or marry me, I'll leave you" is not wanting to not be in a relationship. It's an ultimatum to force someone into action by issuing a threat. Because why would it make sense for someone to ask for what is supposed to be a public lifelong commitment if they in fact didn't want to be in that relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:35 PM
5

It's a catch-22 and built in coping mechanism. If they do get married, it is their choice. If they can't marry the person they want, it's not because they are undesirable, rather, it's because they've opted out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:30 PM
1

If you need 1200 documents to feel comfortable marrying, you’re not ready. What 1,200 documents are you referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:20 PM
0

This is a good thing. The gene pool will end for those who don't want children.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:06 PM

That's exactly what's being said.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:44 PM

So why did you ask me in the first place if you knew the answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 05:27 PM

Maybe. I'm not a woman. Ask them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 05:20 PM

I don't care about the birth rate. It doesn't concern me. Just like we don't want the government dictating reproductive decisions of women, this shouldn't concern anyone except women who want to have children, or not. Let's keep the government and others out of the bedroom and all that flows from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:54 PM

I don't need to. People make decisions based on their individual circumstances. Maybe they are risk seekers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:52 PM

I didn't really care about the fertility rate. What others do with their body isn't my concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:51 PM

Your body, your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:41 PM

If that's the conclusion you reach, good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:40 PM

Hypergamy has nothing to do with working or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:39 PM

Whatever works for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 02:32 PM

You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 02:32 PM

Then sounds like that's fair!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:52 PM

And if they have children? Who pays for childcare? Childcare isn't an asset. The cost should be shared proportional to earning ability as it currently is done. And if it turns out that the family actually saves money if one spouse stays home for a few years, does that mean that spouse gets less in a divorce settlement? Yes. If the spouse stayed home, one assumes that income earned < economic value of staying home, otherwise income earned > economic value of staying home. In that case (staying ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:48 PM

I suggest you do your own laundry, cook your own food and clean your own space and 50% of common spaces. Women tend to have more clothing than men, so that wouldn't be 50/50. Those others tend to have disparities as well, so might as well make it proportionate to your use.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:40 PM

What? You just said they don't. Now you're saying so many women decide to not have kids with a partner until they've entered one of these legal agreements? They don’t, otherwise women wouldn’t have kids, but it becomes an issue during separation where the sacrifices they make fuck them over, because it’s more often than not the woman who gets hit with the economic detriment of being in a relationship. Which one is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:38 PM

Then if women choose to have children, they shouldn't blame or use that as some rationale as why they deserve something after the fact. Their body, their choice. Women are intelligent enough to weigh the risk/reward trade-offs of their decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:12 PM

Agreed upon unpaid labor. If you want to send the Smiths a Christmas card on behalf of the family and the other person has no interest, and you do it anyway, that's not unpaid labor. That's a personal obsession.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:09 PM

Community assets should be split by the proportion that they were financed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:04 PM

This is why women should be upfront and let their partners know that they value their lifetime earnings over having children.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:59 AM

Hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:57 AM
3

Saying the proverbial "he" who you refer to thinking of single mothers as a piece of meat is pure cope. "He" views her as a liability. You get it now?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:31 PM
4

Clearly I disagree by responding with what she actually is: a liability.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:18 PM
3

She's a liability.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 03:48 PM
13

Exactly. Might as well sit in the corner watching her get pounded by her baby daddy. You'll get your gift in 9 months.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 03:47 PM
2

HVMs want children, so a single mom actually is bringing MORE to the table automatically HVMs want their own children, so a single mom actually is bringing LESS to the table automatically Males who avoid single moms are just looking at women as a piece of meat Males who avoid single moms are just looking at women as a piece of meat liability Males who avoid single mothers likely don't have the means to provide for the child because they're broke Males who avoid single mothers likely don't have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 03:43 PM
7

Ah yes, yet another woman defining what a real man is but would have a brain aneurysm if a man would try to define what a real woman is.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 03:37 PM
1

Ah yes - the field of psychology is full of blackpillers who actually didn't do research and see the effect play out among people. Maybe you should use one of the greatest technologies known to man to just type it in and view the research on the topic. There are academic papers you can read.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 10:56 AM
1

My experience is that stupid women consider it an all-purpose insult, as well as stupid men. FWIW, my usual insult is "idiot" and that goes for either sex. Who someone else finds attractive means very little to me. Ah yes, "they're not like us". The argument of the year. You've completely ignored that this is a common insult from women to men to seemingly attack their masculinity. So, if women are mainly homophobic while still being less homophobic than men, how do you explain society's (UK, US,…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 10:48 AM
19

The first insult women generally use towards heterosexual men is calling them gay or saying they engage in gay sex acts. Yes, women are generally homophobic towards gay men. I've known very, very few hetero women reject friendship with gay or bi men based on their sexual preference. Of course they don't because it provides social currency and entertainment for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 12:15 AM
0

Given the amount of women who use homophobic slurs to insult heterosexual men, I'd venture to say most women are homophobic towards gay men unless that gay man is providing them social currency and entertainment. Then they are homophobic behind that man's back.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 12:12 AM
53

This is what women wanted. They said they wanted bears approaching them. Why are they all Pikachu face over these findings, calling men lazy? Lazy men gives them more opportunity for the bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 12:03 AM
8

Only the good actions are gendered generalizations of women. Anything negative, NAWALT!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 11:53 PM
30

This is a necessary post. Women do agree on one thing though, not holding one another accountable for the statements they've made. They'll argue you, a man, to death with "not all, not all, not all" to invalidate a clearly articulated point. But they will say nothing when one of their gender says the same because 🤝. Oh, I forgot to add: not all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 11:49 PM
1

They aren't. It's the women are wonderful effect at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 09:11 PM

This is what the conversation is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:58 PM

They don't find you attractive enough to get you off.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:56 PM

Wonderful. So long as we know that we're matching energy. Maybe their laffy taffy can't get it up because of what they're looking at? Ever asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:48 PM

with his little laffy taffy There's the body shaming ladies and gentlemen. Sooner or later they tell on themselves. sometimes it's better if we do it by OURSELVES without a man pounding into you Sounds like terrible communication from you if all you do is get pounded all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:40 PM

You read that wrong. Complainers and people who have unrealistic expectations do exist, as do victims. Bad things happen and so do disappointments and setbacks. Those people talk about it, so they are overrepresented. Then you do know who this conversation is about. Good to clear that up. That's what you just said. You are the person who claimed women are responsible for getting disappointed because of the company they keep. Does that somehow not apply to you? Aren't you responsible for the comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:38 PM

So why not do it during sex? ETA: men can also do the same. Men do the work to have achieve their orgasm during sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:23 PM

So all the women you had sex with did nothing but lay there uninterested? Nope not all the women. But I guess you didn't know what the word generally means. You would have answered your own question if you did. This is an anomaly sorry to break this to you. Probably comes from a personal problem. Either you chose shitty partners or you expect women to perform like they do in porn. Anyway that's not for me to judge. Yes, women's sexual performance are men's fault. We know, we know. Women can do n…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:23 PM

Not all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:08 PM

Ah yes, the proverbial grammatical "not all women" retort. Because clearly, the discussion is about the 102 year old great grandmother in the nursing home. I'll make sure to tailor my words to exclude her. I'll also exclude the woman who was sentenced to life imprisonment for a double murder and the schizophrenic woman who's been hospitalized for the last 10 years. I forget we must be real specific for you folks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:04 PM

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:01 PM

You accuse her of flip flopping so surely you can point me to where SHE said the things you say, "Women often say" ? If you're seriously asking "where are women saying this? Oh the shock!" - yes, women are the ones saying that men should stay women regardless of how they change in a relationship. I'm not leveling an accusation at her - I'm saying ignoring that women actually make this argument then saying no, women don't because they care about how they do look for their partner is flip flopping…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:59 PM

Which women? Do you spend all your time with broken, stupid women? Women who seem to can't see anything wrong with what some of their own genders does and uses tactics like "there not like us" to act like it doesn't exist. You see, to you, it either a) doesn't exist or b) if it does it exist, it's your fault that broken stupid women are around you. So heads you win, tails, I lose! As if you live in a fantasy world where everyone around you is happy, content and living like a weird stepford wife.…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:24 PM

Flip flopping more than a politician. Women are often saying "if your man can't accept you at your worst, he doesn't deserve you at your best" and "if you gain weight or change your appearance in a relationship, and your man complains, he's an asshole".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:10 PM

Where did you get this idea that women just lay down doing nothing? tik tok? Boomer humor? Not only that's not how sex is but also that's not what's being discussed. From being a man who has sex with women - women are generally lazy. Men can orgasm easier than women so it's only logical that he makes an extra effort for her to orgasm. You can't argue with biology. Completely ignoring the fact that women are not participants in their own pleasure. They expect it all to be the byproduct of the men…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:07 PM

When we are in a sexual RELATIONSHIP we do consider what our partner finds attractive. Doesn't seem like it. It's just about the sex in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:01 PM

Exactly. One of the largest fears of women is the male gaze so how dare they say they are doing anything for men now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:55 PM

You do it for yourself. Women have been quite clear they are not doing it for the male gaze.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:51 PM
3

That's what you think. I suppose you also assume that the only reason she's having sex is because she expects a relationship? And I suppose you also assume that she hasn't already had a relationship with purely awful, unsatisfying sex and knows she doesn't want to revisit that? Do you also believe that she benefits in any way by hanging on to her virginity like it's a precious stone that some man will exchange for an engagement ring? JFC - if she doesn't want a relationship, this conversation is…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:50 PM

And so does she, knowing that it's more difficult to orgasm. Laying down and expecting it to be done for you while you are a passive participant is contributing to your own disappointment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:39 PM
3

Are any terpers aware that women enjoy good sex? And that most women don't "trade" their bodies for a relationship, but enjoy the experience of good sex? Again, who is making this argument? You are purposely deflecting the point. Yes, women enjoy good sex Ms. Obvious. It's that they want a relationship with the person the good sex is coming from. Those are two different but related topics. Good sex doesn't entitle you to further good sex by way of a relationship. Women often conflate the two. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:38 PM

The median time for sex is 5.4 minutes. Biology is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:19 PM

Not much longer. The median time for sex is 5.4 minutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:18 PM

So the man is responsible for his pleasure and making himself orgasm and he's responsible for making you orgasm as well? You can lay down like a star fish while he does all the work and he also needs to focus on your orgasms? While you do nothing? For him or yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:12 PM
3

Women can like the men they let rearrange their guts. No one is arguing that they can't, except you. Hell, they can even fall in love with him. But just because they let that man rearrange their guts doesn't entitle them to a relationship. That simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:09 PM
3

What is it with you women and your blatant homophobic comments? Why do you believe calling a man gay is an insult to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:02 PM
4

Yes. Waiting at the finish line to celebrate with the winner when you did nothing to help them get there is annoying. It's annoying groupie behavior. Women have the right to not date potential - they want to mitigate risks and that's just fine. But low risk, low reward.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:58 PM
12

You're wrong. It comes up when women get into situationships, undefined situations and are fucking the UbërChad and find out he has a harem of women. She believes she should be the only one and is crying to her friends and TikTok about why hasn't he made it official and I feel he's string me along and hasn't asked for something serious 😢 combined with the misguided thought of a man should ask for commitment, that's not a woman's role. When you combine all of these various thought patterns, they …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:49 PM
11

Explain the clear and present danger part.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 08:04 PM
8

It usually is because those men chose to focus and make good decisions in their younger years, delaying gratification. Those men who were out playing may enter their 30s with multiple babies by different women; some of those women also did the same after having fun in their 30s, multiple kids by multiple men. The guys who kept their head down, are moving up the corporate ladder, etc... as you said, did it on their own, now those women want to share in the success of that hard work.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 03:19 PM
1

It's not. It's cope and justification by women for being rejected by their male counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 02:28 PM
3

Rejecting women in their 30s or simply having their hoe phase and not wanting to settle down.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 02:00 PM
13

It's a narrative by women, especially those who criticize age gaps. A guy in his 30s being with a woman in her 20s is "creepy" and he must be rejecting the women his own age because he's getting revenge because they didn't choose him when he was in his 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:59 PM
5

If she was a catch, she would be caught.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:54 PM
27

They're doing it out of success, not revenge. Why wouldn't someone want to enjoy the fruits of their labor?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:49 PM
24

It's just a woman's fever dreams that men are out for revenge because the women aren't being chosen by men who become successful or are clearly on the path to success in their 30s. The wheat is quickly separated from the chaff in the 30s and is clear who is on the path to (conventional) success. They bet on the wrong horse in their 20s and when they are rejected by men who may have wanted them in their 20s, they conjure up a revenge fantasy. It's really that men don't see them as relationship ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:48 PM
5

It doesn't mean you have to support it, it just means you are supporting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:41 PM
3

People aren't crazy until they actually do something crazy. Does time confuse you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:25 PM
1

by claiming to want more than sex. Being vague is the opposite of making a claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:22 PM
3

You didn't have to lie to women who lie to themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:20 PM
1

I wasn't giving you my opinion. I was logically comparing your initial statement to your experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 12:15 AM
1

If what you said was true, he would have left already.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:11 PM
2

You might want to look up the definition of material things, because this isn’t it. Things that can be taken away from you. Your career or hobbies are two of those things. Your values, nope. So, I'm using it correctly. Someone is making things up, but it isn’t me. I have no idea where you pulled this scenario from. The person arguing passionately that career and hobbies should rank alongside valuing the person. If corporate America is that important to you, date your boss.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 09:23 PM
2

If you don’t care about what she does, who she is, her hobbies and interests and goals, how can you enjoy her company? Again - you love making stuff up. Where did I say you don't care about who she is? The problem with women like you is that you define yourself based on your careers then if you're unable to do those careers you complain that a guy left you. That's what you women care about and why guys criticize you when you often leave men after they may lose their jobs - because you define peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 09:13 PM
9

You ought to actually enjoy the company of your wife even when she isn’t sucking your dick. If you don’t, leave her alone and let her find a man who loves and appreciates who she is. What are you even talking about? Who said you don't enjoy the company of your wife? The point is you enjoy the company of the friends and your wife but there is something that differentiates the two types of relationships, isn't there? Your friend is different from your wife. I swear when some of you talk about rela…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:59 PM
4

Are you saying sex isn't a need in a relationship? I’m not saying there shouldn’t be mutual benefit in a relationship. I’m saying that beyond the confines of that mutual benefit, men don’t seem to actually care about the women they’re in relationships with. That's not what you wrote in your OP. You didn't say that men don't care about the women. You said they don't care about their careers and hobbies. Why does it matter that I care that you work in advertising or you crochet? You never actually…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:54 PM
1

So you include yourself in the group of people who have terrible personalities? That's on you. If that's not a general statement, then I don't know what to tell you. It honestly seems you're just deflecting at this point because you have no response. And yes, you should go out and touch grass if you personally believe that men just care about sex when being with someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:26 PM
1

So when you wrote this: The things we like/are good at only matter if it serves some sort of utility to you. Women just aren’t like this. We don’t view you as walking dildos to be replaced the second you do something that mildly annoys us. You were talking about me personally?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:18 PM
2

You don't understand talking about the general "you"? Rather, you'd take it personally? How about answering the substance of the comment. ETA: what's funny is you used the same formulation in your response by saying "we don't view YOU as walking dildos".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:14 PM
6

Why does something have to make them a better partner for you to appreciate it? Because why are they my partner? I appreciate the work and career of Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagen but I don't necessarily want her as a partner. It doesn't make me want to be with her. What I look for in a relationship is different from what I appreciate and my significant other didn't have to do things I appreciate professionally in order for them to be attractive to me. I care about how that person is in a rel…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:07 PM
6

In all the ways. This is not an answer. How do you choose your friends? Because I enjoy their company, I like them, we have good conversation and support one another. I don't choose my friends because they like crocheting or work as lawyers. I have a diverse set of friends with diverse interests. Isn’t it people you like and respect, people you share common interests and values with? Like and respect, yes. How is that connected to one's hobbies, education or career? Common interests, no, common …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 07:50 PM
5

Men as a whole repeatedly say they don't care about women's hobbies, careers, education, etc. How do any of these you've mentioned aid in being a better partner in a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 07:41 PM
1

So according to you, you've been with 1,000 guys and you found 1, your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 12:15 AM
4

Just say you've had bad sex all your life and you're jaded.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 08:30 PM
13

Sort of agree with this. The real orgasm is the attention she gets from others.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 03:12 PM
1

You really don't know how to answer questions do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 10:39 AM
-1

https://phpbb.lightonvedicastrology.com/viewtopic.php?t=24147
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 09:57 PM
-3

This is a first. Justifying domestic abuse has no societal consequences. Life is rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 09:08 PM
1

If you want to date men who don't respect the decisions you make and that's no means no, then you need therapy, full stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 09:04 PM
3

No means no to me. I'm not sure why you would want otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 09:00 PM
0

A woman justifying being abusive because Mitsubishi is in Gatorade certainly does have social consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 08:53 PM
1

So orgasms are the only way sex is enjoyable? That's what's being said?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 07:35 PM

Exactly. That's called "he's such a good friend".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:13 PM
3

Being food secure vs food insecure is a privilege. Surely you should agree with that. But just because your food secure doesn't mean you shouldn't be punished for eating 7,000 calories a day and weighing 350 lbs. Surely you know the difference between the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 10:55 PM
0

So you can make yourself orgasm while having sex with a man within 5 minutes? Then what's the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:55 PM
11

We know. People with privileges typically don't think they have that privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:50 PM
1

When did the term "random" get introduced to this?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:48 PM
-3

What's hilarious is people like you criticizing men for treating sex like porn, but when it comes to women, you think orgasming every single time you have sex is normal. You're just as bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:46 PM
0

If she was serious, she'd know she wanted or didn't want to be in a relationship by date 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:13 PM
0

You think women with access to men they are attracted to are going to be using toys? Please, don't insult our intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:07 PM
2

Decide after date 1 or 2 so you don't waste anyone's time or money. What exactly are you asking on date 4, 5 or 6 at this point?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:06 PM
1

I'm very interesting. But I'm also not delusional enough to decide that I'm interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:02 PM
3

The blue pill wants you to take interesting showers with eucalyptus plants, claw foot tubs and 360 degree shower jets. "just use Diptyque or L'Occitane shower gel and scented oil bro"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:01 PM
3

So you think when during a woman's menstrual cycle, where she's horny because her hormones are going wild, that being able to get sex at that moment, that satisfies her urge, is not a privilege?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 08:49 PM
1

What do you mean is not a privilege? Women have their monthly menstrual cycles and during times of the month are very horny. They can more easily satisfy that biological urge they're having when they feel that way. That's a privilege. Sure, they may say "tee hee... I can't believe I did that 🫣" but the point is, the privilege of being able to more easily have sex that can satisfy their need is a privilege. Just like I can get food more easily than a poor person, I'm not going to act like being a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 08:47 PM
2

No kids Pretty Single Kind Make no less than 67% of my actual income (~400k or more) Takes care of their health Within reasonable size Social Intelligent
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 08:18 PM
1

Why should they pick better men when the decisions they make will never be their fault?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 08:13 PM
2

I'm not sure what this response is supposed to mean. Are you saying that sex is a zero sum game, that the more a man enjoys and benefits from it then a woman's pleasure decreases?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 08:08 PM
2

I agree. The possibility of a woman daydreaming about the vacations, house and lifestyle she'll have is sufficient for her to buy the lottery ticket.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 08:05 PM
2

The issue with your advice is you don't decide if you're interesting, others do. Might as well become a world famous rapper, they are interesting and evidence shows others think so as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 08:02 PM
1

I thought about it... it is. The ease with which one can transform themselves is simple in the blue pill mind. So "just be more interesting bro" might as well be "just become multi-million dollar platinum selling rap artist, bro... that'll make you interesting'.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 07:51 PM
8

A lot of women don’t get much pleasure. From what exactly? The act or what the act signifies. A woman may not get pleasure from a 400 tasting menu at a restaurant, but does it mean there's no meaning in the fact that you spent that money on her? Which is why she would likely dress up well for the occasion? Men here (and a lot of men in real life) state that men will have sex with a woman regardless if she is attractive or not so women don’t really feel attractive just because a man wants to have…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 07:49 PM
9

It's a down payment they hope pays off. The cost of the dinner is equivalent to a lottery ticket.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 07:41 PM
3

Bye! Thx.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 07:40 PM
1

You're also wrong. Thx. Bye!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 07:39 PM
1

I beg to differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 07:37 PM
0

"just become more interesting bro"; "become a now interesting person bro"... The list goes on.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 07:37 PM
11

Pleasure for one. Dopamine hit. The same reason heroine users are addicted to heroine, although there are no apparent benefits. Feeling wanted. Feeling loved for a moment. Feeling attractive. But maybe you should be a little more curious and ask them?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 07:35 PM
4

Isn't this the bluepill manifesto?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 07:32 PM
31

But I do not see any benefits for the average woman being able to have sex with dozens and dozens of men. Especially casually. But they do it, so rather than proclaiming that you don't see the benefit, why not ask what the benefit is? Otherwise, you're saying they are willingly engaging in something that provides no benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 07:28 PM
1

No, because if she stays home and takes care of the kids, then he is not "responsible for the day-to-day care, upbringing, and financial support of their children without a co-parent present in the household.", so not a single father. This has to be wrong because it makes no sense. He simply outsourced the care to another person who he trusts, but that doesn't take away his single status. If this mother or a nanny took care of the child during the day, you would say that's not a single father? B…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 01:46 PM
1

Well if folks want to get very technical, if you're not married, your single. So even if you live in a home with someone who is a parent of your child, you're a single parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 01:40 PM
0

If they are married, he's not really a single dad anymore is he? You're discussing the wrong topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 01:36 PM
1

Yes, women put it on themselves, feigning excitement, then complain about how hard it all is down the line as if someone did something to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 01:34 PM
2

I thought you folks always argue that custody is 50/50 and there is no bias in the courts...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 01:31 PM
0

This happens after the fact, when they've decided to integrate as a family. That's not what is being discussed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 01:22 PM
2

The American Time Use Survey is not using yourself as a source.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:26 PM
5

Ah yes - "lived experience" - code for I'm hostile to any data that doesn't center me as the main character in everyone's story.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:18 PM

You still have time to delete this...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 01:56 PM
2

You found him attractive to date in the first place. Many men wouldn't take that risk at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 01:41 PM
28

It's simple - resources tend to flow in one direction. Typically, single fathers are not seeking additional resources to raise their child, so resources will be "shared" with whoever comes into his life. This is the common understanding of the "typical" single father. On the other hand, a single mother is viewed as a resource extractor for her and her offspring by another man. This is typically referred to as "playing another man's saved game" or the general expectation of "you must take care of…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 01:39 PM
3

Agreed. There's always a reason even for the most egregious of choices, but you're right, a different topic for a different time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 05:02 PM
4

None of this matters. Women try to shame everyone into accepting whatever choices they make. They'll use the words misogyny or the patriarchy if you say you don't like nose rings. Women don't accept any criticism of their choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 04:51 PM
1

Find an older man
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 12:02 AM
6

Passport bros is the only place where xenophobic nationalism is accepted by a cross section of the political spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 12:00 AM

How come these issues are not widely discussed within the United States (or Western countries) if the issue if you care so much about someone of lesser economic status?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 10:45 PM

It's racist because that commentary is not used for those similarly situated in the US (or the West in general).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 10:32 PM

Are women in poor areas in the United States not impressed with a little money? Are you saying if you've gone to Appalachia, that western women, regardless of socioeconomic status, are so evolved that money doesn't matter to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 10:30 PM

Generally, western exceptionalism. If you ask women here, they believe they are better communicators, better educated because of credentials and they make above the world's median income. They think lesser of those from other countries, so of course they'll shame you and tell you that you want to take advantage of the vulnerable, as if these women can't think for themselves (a side note - these are generally the same women who talk about feminism and girl power, but they really only mean power m…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 10:26 PM
2

Glad you had no response to the substance.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 08:06 PM
5

You first accuse me of being the set of people who don't want women to work. Nope, women should work. Work long hours if you will. Work in construction and dangerous jobs - I don't care. Successful women who can't find partners typically have terrible personalities. They are the boss bitch babe stereotypes, even if they make a little more than the average bear. That's why people don't like them. There are plenty of successful women who balance office selves with personal selves. The issue is suc…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 04:21 PM
7

Experience. Successful single women are single because they are generally assholes because they prioritize their success above everything else. It's the girl boss movement. Their personalities are solely rooted in acquiring money and materials. I'm quite liberal. But what isn't left or right wing are assholes. Women should work to their heart's content. What you won't do is think that men should love you for working or being a boss when your personality is pure shit. You deserve nothing for that…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 04:11 PM
9

Do you date women? If not, then I'm by far more of an expert than you'll ever be.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 03:59 PM
5

While you also seem to be admitting women have very little reason to want or treat you well. Strange.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 03:57 PM
1

Do I have to put the "not all women" tag for it to be clear that I'm not referring to Margaret Thatcher? Geez. But you bring up the "generally men think sex is like pizza", just like generally women more often than men think a hoe phase is just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 03:54 PM
10

No. Boss babe women are generally assholes. Even other women don't like you. They only like the image of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 03:35 PM
1

Women like what they like. Men like what they like. Believing that men should like what women like is your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 03:29 PM
4

😂😂😂😂... Sorry, I had to stop laughing before I could start typing. Highly educated successful women who can't find relationships have trash personalities and think they are God's gift to mankind because they are successful in corporate and other spaces. Men don't want to deal with a mid level manager at home. They have work for that. If women like you believe that men should put up with terrible personalities and behaviors just because someone decided to pay them $x and they have a bunch of fanc…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 03:26 PM
-1

Women: "Get off the Internet and touch grass! The world doesn't operate the way you people think!" Also women: " Look up any post about tinder matches. Men will talk about how virtuous they are because they swipe right on most women but women are soooo picky and entitled and demanding because they don’t swipe right on most men." The jokes are beginning to write themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 03:19 PM
3

The celebrated "hoe phase". The women who sleep with men who they then later say didn't count towards their "bodies".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:40 PM
5

What is a woman's "hoe phase" exactly? You women try to criticize men for the same things you defend and glorify yourselves for. "Women can have sex with no attachments", "a hoe phase is normal!", "who cares how many bodies a woman has, you're just jealous" and the list goes on. And now you're all "but men generally more often than women will pursue sex with people they’re hardly even attracted to".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:34 PM
0

In this case, if that's your rationale, women will also fuck anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:30 PM
1

Hey folks - here's a woman telling men what they mean. She's a better man than actually men!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:28 PM

The pill is not the only option, but they are problematic due to being hormonal. Other forms of BC are also hormonal. There are non hormonal ones, like the coper IUD but it causes hell side effects such as super heavy constant bleeding (heavy periods) and intense pain that can last, pardon, for one year! That's why many opt for the hormonal, but like I said they cause worse effects in the long run that are less noticeable while they are still young. But they will have to pay for it later. Or hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 01:44 PM

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:41 AM

A relationship is optional. It's not a need, it's a want. So you don't need to be in a relationship thus no one needs to force you to have sex. Problem solved. You have the solution to your own problem. Remain single.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:41 AM

A random man passing you on the street is a cannibal. I heard you. No need to say it again. It’s sad you hope someone wanted to protect themselves, means they should be single Yes, you and people like you should be single. In fact, no man should be subject to this abusive thinking. They deserve better.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:38 AM

This is a new one. Men are now cannibals. I truly hope many if you are single forever. No man should be subject to this ridiculousness.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:29 AM

When you all are dating the same guy, it tends to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:25 AM

A relationship is optional, not necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:23 AM

No, you don't
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 11:22 AM

I am not sure friend I never gave birth or saw anyone give birth. Never even been to gynecologist. But way too many gynos and nurses are abusive to women. If you subscribe to some childfree subs you will see men confirming that nurses became less violent when men entered. If you didn't know, then unsure how to respond to this. Saying there are nurses or OB/GYNs that can be be violent is different from saying it's a feature of that profession. Aaaand they all cause side effects to women. Sex is n…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 10:27 AM

It does have to do with your comment, as how society treats mothers, whether married or single, is perceived by them everywhere, starting from them being pregnant in the public bus where no one gives up a seat, to a nurse violence during birth, to people telling her her pp body is awful, to, God forbid they divorce, men telling her she is useless for having a kid. So yes there is a relation. You said society treats mothers normally, I said they don't. Let's interrogate. What % of nurses are viol…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 10:15 AM

The amount of women and their ilk who blame the terrible dating market on men, all the while, they are pure trash prompted my response.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 10:06 AM

Aren't they gender-neutral? If they were more single fathers, more of them would get the said benefits. But single fathers are really a small minority. I don't know the "they" you're referring to. Again, fathers cannot benefit from WIC. Only their kids. It's literally in the program description. Is tax child credit given only to single mothers? I'd guess it's one of the ways the state is trying to support families. Because it does need kids. No, it's not only given to single mothers, but it cuts…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 10:02 AM

Nurse violence is a thing. Most women who would love to have 2+ babies, after seeing how terribly they are treated while giving birth to the first kid, vow to never get pregnant again. Women treated worse than cattle in birth clinics. Don't forget the notorious husband stitch that's done without the consent of the woman. Think of all the other things they do to them. No wonder women who would otherwise be willing to have multiple kids have PTSD and never come back. Nothing to do with my comment.…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 09:49 AM

But they are still here. So there hasn't been popular societal support to get rid of them, has there?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 04:09 AM

Wrong. "WIC benefits, by design of the program, are provided only to pregnant, postpartum, breastfeeding women, infants, and children under the age of five"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 04:08 AM

For themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 04:07 AM

You completely are ignoring that society expresses its values through policy, but you want to substitute "cultural attitudes" that differ from group to group in place of actual fact and policies that society set in place. If cultural attitudes were what you folks are saying they are, there would be no popular support for supporting motherhood and its attendant supports. It's like you folks are looking for evidence everywhere except what's in your face.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 04:06 AM

Fathers don't get WIC for themselves, what are you talking about? "three-quarters of households living in public housing and in Project-Based Section 8 housing are female- headed, and over 83% of voucher-holding households are headed by women. A large proportion (72%) of Section 202 housing units are also home to female-headed households." These programs are designed to help women, not men. Let's not be disingenuous here. These mothers get financial help from the state, because it's cheaper to p…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 04:03 AM

Again... I hope you're familiar with micro vs macro decisions. I'll say it once more - societies express priorities and values through spending. Micro decisions don't reflect a society's priorities, it reflects that individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 03:59 AM

There are lots of non breastfeeding dads. But again, society doesn't value men who need nutritional help, so yea, the tone of sarcasm checks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 03:57 AM

This makes no sense. Your micro decisions are very different from macro societal level decisions. Societies show their priorities primarily through what they spend their resources on based on the policies they embrace. In the US in particular, the tax code is used to incentivize and punish behavior. Yours is the equivalent of saying the US doesn't value defense when it is a significant portion of its spending. You ever wonder why there isn't an equivalent "MIC" program? Society doesn't value sin…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 03:34 AM

I don’t think these programs make a good argument about appreciation or value by society. So society came together, elected politicians that created a program called Women with Infants and Children, and you're arguing that society doesn't appreciate motherhood? Tax credits create a financial incentive but they don’t convey status or appreciation. The American Opportunity Credit rewards people for attending college but we wouldn’t take that to mean that people have a special appreciation for coll…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 01:43 AM

We know what white collar and blue collar are. You know why white collar people especially with their bachelor's degree look down on blue collar workers. It has nothing to do with "easy". So let's not play games.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 01:25 AM

Feminism can only exist in cushy, airconditioned jobs
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 01:05 AM

It's literally what he wrote. Seriously, what is wrong with you people?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:07 AM

I see. You didn't understand how percentages and per capita measures work. You think if 100 went to 101 even if the population increased 10 fold, that you actually had a point. Figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:06 AM

Way too many women delluded themselves into thinking that most women are not just full of negative traits. When it couldn't be farther from the truth. This right here. This needs to be expressed far more often.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:03 AM

Plenty of men claim to be lied to after they enter marriage and have kids. Life generally sucks for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:01 AM

When you say society doesn't appreciate motherhood, are you talking about the same society that created WIC, EBT, Medicaid, the Child Tax Credit and Section 8 that primarily benefits single mothers? Or do you only care about some random private comments that people make? Are you talking about mothers like this with 7 babies by 7 different men getting 3,000 per month in food assistance from this same society? https://youtu.be/myHrKyADRxY?si=lJcfvi7ZmuESLirQ
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 11:53 PM

Further proving his point. Equality only means white collar cushy jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 11:46 PM

Why is it that the top 20 jobs women have now, are the same top 20 jobs they had during the oppressive patriarchy restricting women with the glass ceiling? This is what he wrote. It wasn't that zero women entering those jobs but rather the share of women are unchanged in the top 20 jobs. This is why people like you are disingenuous in these spaces when you have no argument. You think that a "gotcha" moment makes you look smart when it reeks of desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 11:45 PM
3

Why are you even arguing this point? You already said she did it with the person she "really loved". She doesn't love you. If you are so much into trying anal, would you accept pegging? Would you indulge a gf who nags you for pegging or using a 10-inch dildo on yourself? Not sure why you're bringing up things that I never tried with anyone before. It wasn't in your hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 04:35 AM

You mind revising your statement: Given that a large percentage of Red Pill writers have sex with prstittes (there's a dating models post on the red pill right now which is clearly about hiring prstittes) and a large percentage of Red Pill Youtube Content creators have sex with prstittes, are they disqualified from giving Alpha advice?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 10:25 PM

You didn't answer the question. What % of the red pill writers sleep with prostitutes?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 10:21 PM
2

Better personalities. They are generally boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 09:50 PM
0

Start with the bias against boys in the school system.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 09:32 PM
2

in·trin·sic adjective belonging naturally; essential. in·tu·i·tive adjective using or based on what one feels to be true even without conscious reasoning; instinctive. Who is misunderstanding words that are clearly defined? Because none of these means "effortlessly knowing".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 09:30 PM

One of the core foundational premises of the Red Pill is that all women are like that. This immediately raises three questions: Which women? Like What? To whom are they like that? You love the shadowboxing here. You make up a claim (one more grounded) then go down the rabbit hole of inquiry of your made up claim. It's amazing. Given that a large percentage of Red Pill writers have sex with prstittes (there's a dating models post on the red pill right now which is clearly about hiring prstittes) …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 09:28 PM
2

And again... Those same skills have been taught to girls, ladies and women for generations now. It’s been intrinsic and intuitive
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 09:07 PM
3

Can we focus on the confusion you had in your first statement? For whatever reason though, men seem to have a large issue with women creating and participating in these groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 09:05 PM
0

So women intuitively know how to: grooming, self maintenance, nutrition, exercise, social behaviors, interpersonal communication, nonverbal cues, emotional awareness & coping strategies etc. 😂😂😂 Right.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 09:04 PM
1

We're talking about women here. The claim is that it's innate and intuitive for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 09:02 PM
2

No, just trying to see what crap dressed up as social grade inflation that we get to hear today under the "women are wonderful" banner.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 09:00 PM
2

Those same skills have been taught to girls, ladies and women for generations now. It’s been intrinsic and intuitive so why would there be digital online forums sharing basic commonly held information like that? so now you're changing your stance, because talking about an intrinsic and intuitive skill set that doesn't need to be shared on a digital forum sure doesn't sound like you're talking about grandma. This response is a pure backtrack. Nothing about this was historic when you're laying cla…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:43 PM
4

You think a Facebook group called AWDTSP is a social circle?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:40 PM
1

Just coz people have tried something once, doesn't necessarily mean, they loved it. I feel the same way about paying for dinner dates. Maybe she did try anal after one ex whom she really loved. And found that she hated it. And swore never to try it again. If she wanted to, she will. She doesn't love you, just like you wrote. If she doesn't suck it from the back, she doesn't love you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:36 PM
6

Facebook is not a social circle, no more than Hinge is a local lounge.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:32 PM
6

Elsewhere, we see this “reference system” being replicated. That’s all of the “Are We Dating The Same Guy?” groups. Because sometimes you’re not dating the same guy but women will also share their experiences of going on a date with that person, and on occasion you’ll see something positive. For whatever reason though, men seem to have a large issue with women creating and participating in these groups. This is why women will fail. They will ironically trust the word of a stranger who happens to…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:29 PM
4

Things like grooming, self maintenance, nutrition, exercise, social behaviors, interpersonal communication, nonverbal cues, emotional awareness & coping strategies etc. Women are equally as disgusting in their grooming as men. You've never been on a college campus or maybe never heard the debate of white women particularly admitting they don't wash their legs. Nutrition, exercise - so the obesity crisis we are seeing among women is a result of nutrition and exercise? interpersonal communication,…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:21 PM
1

Grifters are important for the dating market and serve an essential purpose. It allows everyone to sharpen their being mechanisms. This is a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:16 PM
-1

What type of social skills? The same ones that involve anxiety, depression and antidepressants?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:14 PM
1

Those same skills have been taught to girls, ladies and women for generations now. It’s been intrinsic and intuitive so why would there be digital online forums sharing basic commonly held information like that? What skills exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:09 PM
2

Because they claim they are "doing it on their own". But are you trying to have it both ways now? That single moms should be blamed insofar as the father isn't involved? That is the implication of your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:43 PM
3

50% of the money that you would be spending on both your and her lawyers is money that she likely would have been entitled to keep for herself otherwise to spend on whatever she wants - California is a community property state. She is directly affecting her own funds by spending that money fighting it. But she sees the children as her priority, because what could be more important to spend money on? You clearly don't understand divorce. Lawyers fees are not part of the marital estate. It's compl…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:37 PM
2

How exactly does 'single mother" mean "uninvolved father"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:32 PM
2

You should show these stats to the single mothers having children with the men in your statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:25 PM
1

The test for being a model was expressed in the case Jimmy Cooks v. Women's Advocacy Organization with the famous ruling: "Bitch, don't tell me that you model if you ain't been in Vogue"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 09:56 PM
2

No. It's pretty universally held.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 09:51 PM
2

So you agree settling is a conversation among women. And you agree men stay in relationships. Who knows if it's a better alternative? That's a judgment call you've made. If she's adoring, she doesn't have time to think of such minor things. Point proven.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 02:40 AM
4

You said, “No one is complaining that women value high status men. Men are complaining that the values/personalities/etc of a great portion these men are well known to women already, and women continue to chase them.” Which strikes at the heart of OPs argument. Thus implying there are women who pursue high status men, no one has a problem with this, but within that group of women who pursue high status men there is a subset of women who pursue men who look high status but really aren’t because t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 02:38 AM
2

The problem is, as you seem to have missed the argument, is that women will much sooner ask themselves if they settled. The conversation about settling and "deserving better" is very much a woman-based conversation. You don't hear this language among men. Men are typically expected to be the ones to take care of the person they are/chose to be in a relationship with. Women are much more prone to leave once they've gotten the hint that they settled because they "deserve more"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 01:58 AM
5

When you say, “Men are complaining that the values/personalities/etc of a great portion these men are well known to women already, and women continue to chase them,” you’re focusing on a subset of women who repeatedly make really bad choices when it comes to sex and dating, and who probably wouldn’t be a good partner. This is the subset of women the original post is referring to, or put more plainly, the set of women who "place value on high status men", hence why the discussion is already limit…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 01:55 AM
10

My response actually addresses the post. It doesn't use the tool of deflection and whataboutism as you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 01:19 AM
8

Sure bit is this the topic at hand?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 01:17 AM
2

She's too busy adoring him to think that
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 01:16 AM
47

This post repeatedly comes up and it continues to be disingenuous because either you are purposely ignoring the argument or you just have zero understanding of what is being said. No one is complaining that women value high status men. Men are complaining that the values/personalities/etc of a great portion these men are well known to women already, and women continue to chase them. When they get burned by those same men, they go complaining about how shitty all men are. It's effectively blaming…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 01:02 AM
1

But you just said, and I quote: I view sex as something only to be had between married spouses. So how exactly will you punish someone with someone you won't have sex with?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 03:46 PM
1

Then explain your concept of "punishment".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 03:36 PM
1

Sure, he doesn't "have to", but if he "taking it slow" for 5 years, and being deliberately obtuse then yes, he is to blame. That's all that's important. If someone is interested in a committed relationship and the other person is being "obtuse" and they are sticking around for 5 years with zero commitment, he is not to blame. Just like if you aren't being promoted at your job, it's not up to your company to want to promote you. It's up to you to leave. What you're suggesting is other people be r…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 02:46 PM
1

And you know very well a man doesn't have to say he's not interested in a relationship. If it's not an enthusiastic yes, it's a no. But women will take the gray space and create dreams and visions for themselves and then tell the world how "he acted like he wanted a relationship". Let's not talk about stories that we don't know intimately - we are all aware there are three sides to a story. All you know is what women said happened but dig a little deeper and you'll find the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:58 PM
2

Because your argument was based on wealth and power.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 11:29 PM
1

There's no need to lie to women. They lie to themselves when it's the guy they want to commit, despite all signs they won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 11:21 PM
5

"but you've been fucking me for 2 months now... how did you not think I wouldn't want something serious..." This is what eventually comes that they don't want to admit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:37 PM
1

So according to your missive, But he is well aware that if he says that all she can expect from him is an fwb arrangement or situationship, she will most likely decline him and he may never see her again. so where in this scenario did the exclusive relationship begin? Otherwise, it's just cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:33 PM

So you're not saying anything groundbreaking here. If the overwhelming criticism is dating isn't equitable, especially as women are claiming that they are doing better than men, your answer isn't that all dates should be dutch, rather your answer is if you can't afford an expensive dinner, go to a cheaper place... but still pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:21 PM

Exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:18 PM

Name checks out. Fun idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:09 PM

Two different issues. Are you saying men should pay by going to a cheaper place (contradicts your "go dutch" call to action) because that's still a man paying or are you saying men shouldn't pay at all regardless of the location?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:01 PM

For example the first amendment protects all rights to free speech, that is a fact and can be proven true via the Bill of Rights. This is so wrong, I can't believe you wrote this. First, 1A doesn't protect all rights to free speech. Second, if the law was logical and straightforward, you wouldn't need to have a Supreme Court whose literal job is to "say what the law is". Lastly, if the law was logical, please explain the logic of the law that determined slaves were 3/4th of a person and treated …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 11:01 AM

This doesn't sound well reasoned. If politics were logic based, politics (and political parties) by definition, wouldn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:53 AM

Explain why your premise includes politics not being "emotional"? What are you basing this on?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:50 AM

if we take real examples in modern society you can see its not uncommon for female politicians to be overly involved emotionally. Let's say the U.S., there has been many cases where female politicians are more prone to allowing their emotions to take over and cloud their judgment. Name a time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:47 AM
1

Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 02:27 AM
-3

Interesting you write about them being "representative" of a particular group but now say they aren't real while you compared them to a real group. I guess words mean something else. I'm not a woman, but I'll pass along your message to other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 12:32 AM
-2

I don't know about you, but I believe all women. Then why write about the women on TikTok if they are real?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 12:11 AM
7

How would she have the knowledge of who women rejected and for what reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:58 PM
5

You date women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:52 PM
0

This: Notably - no-one wants a big fancy dinner date as a first date. Far too-high stakes and long. contradicts this: There are women on TikTok demanding fancy dinners as first dates - but they’re no more representative of your average single girl than Andrew Tate is of single guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:50 PM
2

As a responsible parent knowing you have a child at home, why would you get drunk? Is she being force fed alcohol? If she doesn't know this basic thing, maybe she shouldn't be a mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 06:54 PM
1

I don't understand what this is attempting to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 06:23 PM
3

Please link. Thx.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 05:37 PM
12

I'm also assuming she puts a lot into her appearance. What limited time she has to spend with her child is being sacrificed as well. Let's not even mention safety risks as a woman meeting a strange man. (See Bear in the woods) No one cares. Her appearance is her choice. The man put a lot of effort into working to earn money. He doesn't expect compensation for that. This dumb line of argument needs to stop. She also is an adult who can make choices. If she is sacrificing time with her children to…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 05:28 PM
1

Number 4 conflicts with Number 2. Why would someone pay for the caretaking of someone they don't know. In what other arena does this work? Number 1 - "make it worth her time". Unreasonable. Is there no expectation for her to be creative? Is she dating the court jester and wants to be entertained? Number 3 - no one is forcing her to drink. She needs to be adult enough to not drink and drive or arrange alternate transportation. There's no reason a man has to pay to babysit one child while having t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 05:20 PM
3

A lot of RP guys seem to think that women who turn men down politely are being disingenuous and that they want "The Truth, The Whole Truth, & Nothing But The Truth'' from them. Can you provide evidence for this premise? The rest of your argument flows from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 05:13 PM
5

Stay on topic. If you have a problem with the prompt for this debate, then take it up with the moderators.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 02:02 PM
1

It encourages leisure, not laziness. Surely you can think of non-rich people who are lazy....
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:20 PM
1

And if they didn't, you'd take away ownership?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:20 PM
3

The conversation here is about men and women in relation to men. Can you folks at least try to stay on topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:17 PM
1

Can't tell you I know what would happen, but seems to encourage laziness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:15 PM
3

Accumulate capital and own the means of production
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:53 AM
1

Because women are transactional
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:31 AM
3

Using individuals who are at the top of the totem pole getting romantic success with capitalistic-like returns is the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:29 AM
6

Or become a better capitalist.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:23 AM
4

Women leave men for less. So it doesn't matter that it's reasonable, it only matters that it happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:20 AM

Most people dont fuck people they dislike. Explain the rise of single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 11:09 AM
-1

Women like you believing you can get into the minds of men to actually say what they want makes you look as if you have delusions of grandeur, are narcissistic and your ego is equally as ridiculous as the ones you mentioned. You have no clue.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:28 PM

Again, your flawed logic not addressed. What you're arguing is people have zero sex when the relationship is not going well, which is another ridiculous claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:26 PM
1

Fucking women is doing it for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 07:43 PM
1

If you had kids, would you value them even though they are a net liability?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 05:30 PM
0

So why bring up physical assault?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 05:15 PM
1

All behavior, in the absence of interpretation of objective. Simply saying x happened is fine. Saying x happened, therefore it is y, is subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 05:15 PM
1

If you're comparing wages, how else do you determine this? Are wages not paid by companies? And who is talking about value?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 05:13 PM
4

No, the behavior is objective. The interpretation of the behavior is subjective. That's what was said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:30 PM
4

This doesn't address the flaw in your logic. I'm sure even you can envision a relationship that goes for years prior to when a child is born.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:29 PM
8

This reasoning makes zero sense whatsoever. You can easily say if you're in a committed relationship with no signs of breaking up, you shouldn't need a prenup. In one case you agree that people can change, but you deny their ability to change in the other case? Doesn't track.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:23 PM
1

If there's a guy standing in her yard in the rain for 15 minutes at 2:00 in the morning... Nothing I described there is subjective. Is that behavior that actually happened or is it a hypothetical? A dispassionate description of this behavior is not what is at issue here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:19 PM
-1

Then how is one to read that? You seem to imply that your father was the cause of your abuse at the hand of another person.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:13 PM
-2

Am I reading this correctly that you blame your dad for your mom's choice to physically assault you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 03:09 PM
3

You're imagining a world that didn't exist. You have no idea what you would have been if they divorced, which is exactly why this reasoning is poor because it's asymmetrical.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:59 PM
4

I bet you also don't believe in prenups because guys should "trust" that his soon to be ex wife will treat him nicely?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:51 PM
-1

That's not the measure of great physical shape. A lot of athletes don't have six packs - you'd argue they aren't in great physical shape?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:28 PM
1

You need to get out more. Lack of sleep, yes. Not in great physical shape, nah. These aren't bodybuilders, of course, because they have a day job.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:23 PM
6

"If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, did it really make a noise". This argument is tiring. We are a social species. To argue that self improvement is not validated by your social environment is just naive. This "you should do it for yourself" - why? If no one cares, what actual return do you get from it? Just knowing you did? People get plastic surgery to sit in their homes and look at themselves? You think that would be enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:22 PM
2

You are just plain wrong. There are countless people complaining about not getting an ROI on their college degrees. If it was just about self improvement, they should be happy that they were better educated than most of the country. But even they want it to be valued by others in the form of compensation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:18 PM
2

Huh? You think Wall Street is just a bunch of fat, stupid rich people? Have you worked in finance?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 02:11 PM
1

Because you wrote "I think WNBA should make more". The NBA is doing just fine. Their viewership records already show it. You are talking about advertising when the media rights are the ones increasing the revenue. Advertisers want to be associated with what's popular. The market is speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:03 PM
1

So you think, even though the WNBA loses money every single year, and the NBA subsidizes the salaries of the WNBA, you think the NBA should be subsidizing them more? So this is not about actual productivity for you and the results of work done. You didn't think WNBA players should be paid commensurate with their output. In fact, they should be paid less if we are being real.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:23 AM
1

Then you must not know what you said but it's right there in writing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:06 AM
1

So work shouldn't be performance based on your mind? Make less sales, you should be paid the same as the person who makes more sales?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:22 AM
6

I don't. What's your next argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:11 AM
6

No. Don't have children. You want to work and earn as much money.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:09 AM
1

So, define the "same amount for the same work". Say you are on a trading desk and person 1 makes a great trade and manages risk and is compensated for their PnL for the year. Person 2 has losses and isn't compensated as high. Are you saying that despite their different performance on the job, the difference between their pay should be exactly zero?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:08 AM
1

But if you're not working, you're not in industry. Stay at home parent isn't a job title.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:06 AM
1

Do you think NBA and WNBA players should make the same amount of money?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:00 AM
7

Sure. Don't have kids then. You won't have these problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:57 PM
7

Then don't have kids. Having kids is a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:55 PM
3

Because that's not how statistics work
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:46 PM
1

Are women's income of zero from staying at home being included in gender pay statistics? Because that would be very dumb to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:45 PM

Write a will. Give all your money to charity. Problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 11:41 PM

The aim is to malign everyone involved in the bullshit. There's a court process to hold deadbeat fathers accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 08:20 PM

Everyone should pay. The mothers need to take them to court since they know who they had sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 08:19 PM

Thanks for proving my point. Yes, they should take responsibility for giving birth since they are literally the only ones who can do it. That boys disproportionately have behavioral and learning problems. No. See Professor Galloway's research and come back with an actual response.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 05:28 PM

Constantly seeing the hate on women having kids, but never against the men who abandon children and forcing the government to spend extra when he refuses to help and pay child support. Never even berating the guys who have multiple baby mamas, clearly not caring for them, but its always “women picking bad boys”, not “piece of shit having me pay more in taxes because he cant use protection.” Let's say there's a huge cocaine producer in Colombia. But he has no way to get the cocaine to the US, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 05:15 PM
0

👍🏿
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 02:16 AM
1

You "distracted" him. Lol. No lecture? No "knock it off Buddy!". Just a distraction huh? Out of sight, out of mind for you I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 01:35 AM
-1

you want the woman to declare out loud the name and then the money will be magically transported to her bank account lol You act like this is some heavy lift. A woman here decided to have sex and have the resulting baby. If you can't find the man you fucked, you need to look in the mirror for the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 01:23 AM
1

You're now realizing you did nothing of substance huh? Must suck when you thought you were a hero telling this story.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 01:00 AM
4

So prostitution huh? Can't have the milk for free. It's transactional.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:59 AM
2

Have you ever thought not to fuck someone who you don't know? Does that thought ever cross your mind? People are quite easy to find, assuming you know basic information about them. It's not about her bank account. It's the person she decided she would let bust raw inside her, then choose to have this person's baby, to provide for his spawn. How terrible of a mother are you that you don't think the person who you let paint your walls doggy style shouldn't take care of his responsibilities?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:59 AM
0

You people are loving in a fantasy world. You create these scenarios in your mind and think it actually works. You are not keen, you have no idea how men interact. You folks are making it up as you go along. Delusional doesn't even begin to describe this line of thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:55 AM
3

How do you not know the name of the man you had sex with? Who you let paint your walls raw.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:45 AM
0

Let's rehash: For a sub that keeps screeching about how women have to take accountability, they sure do push back when being tasked with making men accountable. That was you right? You think men who will abuse and cheat are persuaded by a lecture or a "knock it off". The fantasies you people create in your minds about how the world works are just plain ridiculous. And you continue to hold on to it, that's the wild part.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:41 AM
2

What exactly is the "milk" here?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:38 AM
4

Almost no one wants to get married in college these days. So he proposed that they will get married once they graduate. But he kept postponing. He swore he would marry her, but that day never came. He always had an excuse- " we are too young. Our finances are not stable yet... blah blah blah" Why would she stay after this? She chose to stay after a broken promise that according to you, was important to her without a conversation? She participated in her own disappointment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:37 AM
2

You women talk out of both sides of your mouths. "He's a terrible person, how can you hang around him?!" So "good" men choose not to hang around cheaters, convicts, abusers, drug addicts, etc. and choose to be around like minded people. And now it's "how come you're not telling men to knock it off?!" You folks are nonsensical. I don't hang around people who I have to tell "hey man, knock it off". It's women fucking these men behind closed doors who are slapping them around. You want these "good"…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:33 AM
1

Of course it's ridiculous because it's how ridiculous the statement is. Telling women to stop going back to men who abuse them, cheat on them, etc... is so crazy, but telling men to police the actions of people around them that they know nothing of is far more plausible to you people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:15 AM
1

How is that holding the man accountable? You did nothing except allow him to find the next victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:05 AM
2

You do understand being held accountable for your own choices versus being held accountable for the choices of others right? For example, you want me to lecture Vladimir Putin that invading sovereign countries is a bad thing to do because he's a man? So now all men invade sovereign countries unless we don't hold Putin accountable?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 12:01 AM
2

Men are not around to parent terrible men to create great partners for you. We have lives and families. Stop associating with trash and you won't get treated as such. Stop trying to socialize your losses while you privatize the gains.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:55 PM
0

Of course you choose the bear. We see your choice in men, it's not a stretch that you would continue to put yourself in danger.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:45 PM
0

These women love to socialize the losses and privatize the gains. Narcissistic if you ask me.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:43 PM
1

These drug addicts, convicts and abusers are forcing women into relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:41 PM
1

It adds nothing to the conversation because everyone would choose better if they could. Wrong. Just completely wrong. Story after story of women choosing to go back to an abuser, a convict, a deadbeat, etc... when they have the choice to do better. Women on here continually quote the formula "good relationship > being single > bad relationship" so I call bs on "they would choose better if they could". Call it what it is - women think they have the power to change a person. It's egotistical think…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:40 PM
3

So if a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, did it make a noise? That's the classic question. Recognition is part of validation. If you don't have anything to benchmark against, what's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:28 AM
0

Remember that whole "group x is not a monolith" that folks love to say in this sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:10 AM
-1

How is this control?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 02:19 AM
1

I appreciate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:19 AM
-6

I'm not 13. If I find someone who is a pleasure to be around, I'll be an adult and see if it's reciprocated.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:05 AM
3

Roughly 23% more expensive than Poland Spring. Better make sure she's worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:48 AM
0

I'm grown. I don't have a "crush".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:26 AM
2

Because in this scenario, the woman is married and is acting as a whore?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:25 AM
1

Even better. A breathing date.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:17 AM
6

Women take men out on first dates? And not sure what logical argument you're making. Please expand. Because you find out they're trash when you talk to them. Are you saying women are psychic?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:17 AM
2

Agree 100%. Like attracts like. Don't push your mistakes on people who haven't made those same mistakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:15 AM
-5

Says the person on the internet, again.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 11:35 PM
13

With the amount of trash women floating around the dating pool, I suggest men go on water dates. No more than Poland Spring, maybe Evian if you're feeling fancy. Even coffee is too large an investment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 11:35 PM
20

Early dates at fine dining establishments are simply a way to subsidize one's lifestyle at someone else's expense. Most of these people don't care about social etiquette. They only care that they've benefitted as a first order effect. Everything else you wrote is second order to the self centered nature of the need for early fine dining. That woman doesn't care about his finances. You think she can tell the difference between him being in the deep financial abyss simply because she got to order …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 11:32 PM
-2

Says the person on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 11:22 PM
2

To support - give approval, comfort, or encouragement to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 11:15 PM
3

Ah, yes. It's always "not serious" or "a joke" when the women are all "tee-hee, she's cheating on Sam with big dick Billy, tee hee" but when men say the equivalent, it's abusive misogynistic gaslighting at work that causes Trauma®. They can never be justified as joking.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 11:13 PM
3

Let's not change the subject. You said it isn't "amnesia, but confusion". Are you saying that women forget who they slept with, forget their hoe activities and potentially who they may have created a child with?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 11:06 PM
4

She decided to let multiple men fuck her and you're blaming it on the father who didn't know she was allowing multiple men to fuck her? Does she not have actual knowledge that she was fucking multiple men?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 09:35 PM
3

Yes, the mother who is a whore. You're saying she has amnesia with who she let fuck her?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 09:20 PM
2

I read what you wrote. No change to my response.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 08:40 PM
3

Ah yes. This is the shield that you use, like some right wing evangelist lifting up the Bible to their face to justify any act they may do - " the Bible says it!". "The child is part of the mother" you argue, so it would be wrong to do anything beneficial for one's self because that would be "harming the child". Sure, use the child as the shield for your bad acts. Relying on that type of reasoning is transactional as well, so for you, it's only the transactions that benefit you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 08:37 PM
4

The whore mother knows who the father is. Go find him and have him pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 08:29 PM
3

Return of the ill gotten gains from the period it was defrauded plus interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 08:27 PM
2

Bernie Madoff's wife and sons were in the dark about his activities. Did they still suffer consequences? Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 01:56 PM
1

Are you for real? In one case, the woman knows she was raped. You're saying after 13 years of being lied to, a man knows he was the father?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 01:48 PM
8

IT's the part where you birth it, raise it to think you love it, then abandon it for no fault of it's own that make it cruel. "It's the part where you birth it, be tricked into raising it due to the actions of their whore mother.." FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 01:44 PM
21

Of course you'd respond like this, completely ignoring the fact that in one situation, the woman knows she was raped while in the other situation, the truth has been kept from a man. You'd probably call a man an asshole if he took his life after learning none of his 4 kids were actually his after they were all older and learning he's been loving a lie. You'd probably use the same language "you're a monster for taking your own life because you abandoned your kids! How dare you cut them off!". Thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 01:40 PM
0

But to give a more specific answer: I'm saying there is no possible action you can take to guarantee someone is 100% trustworthy. But there are risk reduction techniques. If you use nothing, then that's your problem. "intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain" Omitting information is intentional deception, and it's done to secure the sale. I'm sure plenty of legal systems have redefined fraud to a ridiculous degree for the sake of helping some rich people avoid the spirit of the la…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 03:03 AM
3

People don't typically have a choice in getting tricked either. We can do things to reduce the chance we get tricked or murdered but we can't simply decide to not be tricked or murdered. Are you saying sex is so powerful that you can't possibly wait to have it with someone trustworthy by vetting? So you mean, you can do things that reduce your chances. 😮 Yes, I would call that fraud. It's not fraud. You can want to call it that, but you'll be wrong. I think society functions much much much bette…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 02:24 AM
6

Life isn't fair. I don't know how people are determining fairness in this situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 02:08 AM
8

Because the person who raised someone who wasn't their child for 18 years was guilty and should receive the blow of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 01:50 AM
2

So sorry man.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 01:36 AM
18

You were but a distant memory. Men are expendable to people around here. Their purpose is to clean up women's mistakes and not have agency or choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 01:30 AM
10

It is entirely your choice to cut your now step child off, to be clear. You’re still a dick for it though. Remember folks, when you've been traumatized and you're a victim, you're also a dick... That is if you are a man. When the choice has been taken away from you to make a decision that impacts your entire life, you are a dick. You, as a man, should continue to face the product of fraud. Society pays lip service to men's mental health when in fact people like you truly don't believe men have f…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:47 AM
14

You're oversimplifying a lot here. while yes the kid need to fault their mother but they're in a tough spot just as the dad is. That is the mother's fault. Not the dad's. in fact since the kid lost a dad you expecting him to cut his mother too and become alone is weird since this is the time in their life they need the most support. I don't care what the kid does to the mother. Where did I say they should cut them off. They have a choice. But the mother put them in the situation they are current…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:36 AM
5

The person being murdered typically doesn't have a choice in their own murder. Are you talking about rape here or are you talking about two consensual adults making a decision to sleep with one another? If you willingly purchased a house without an inspection, would you blame the homeowner for not disclosing the termite damage under the porch? If you went to a used car lot and purchased a car with a price too good to be true, you blame the salesman for embellishing when they gave you an opportun…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:26 AM
15

They should sell out the person who victimized them - their whore mother. You don't get to tell victims how they should process their victimhood. If a family member was stealing from your account for 18 years, and you found out, you wouldn't actively continue allowing them to take money from your account.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:21 AM
0

Yes. This is why you don't fuck people the first night you meet them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:19 AM
10

Why are you worried about what other men would do when you aren't practicing what you preach?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:19 AM
10

"a child of one's husband or wife by a previous relationship." If the relationship wasn't a previous one, but she was actively fucking other men and having them slap their dicks across her face while you were married/in a relationship, that can hardly be called a "previous relationship".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:18 AM
1

They have many expenses and are seeking out assistance with paying for the multi year liabilities they had with other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:15 AM
4

Being vague is not manipulation. Every adult has the capacity to ask questions for clarification, not make assumptions and determine a way forward based on those responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:12 AM
6

Had a whore as a mother. We can't escape the sins of our families sometimes. It wasn't some kids fault they were born with HIV either; doesn't mean people have to want to have sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:08 AM
11

They are anti choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:04 AM
10

Adoption implies choice. There was no choice here. You folks are pro-choice, until it seems you're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 12:01 AM
19

Followed by "have your whore of a mother explain why". Not sure why you have smoke for the victim in this situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 11:56 PM
10

A stepchild implies a choice before the fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 11:54 PM
2

That person's father abandoned them with assistance from their mother. Would you willingly continue to be defrauded if someone stole your identity?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 11:52 PM
14

They aren't a stepchild.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 11:50 PM
9

Are you a step father? Are you helping parent a child that's not yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 11:49 PM
2

Children are increasingly abandoning their parents. I don't see anything wrong either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 11:48 PM
5

A corollary to this means that any actions that don't benefit the woman are seen as misogyny or in the class of behaviors that would be "hostile".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 08:55 PM
1

No. Because I don't think any human is impossible to harm or damage.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 11:06 PM
1

Yes, I think empowered means you can handle the results of your decisions. Stop infantilizing adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 10:20 PM
1

Agency is the sense of control that you feel in your life, your capacity to influence your own thoughts and behavior, and have faith in your ability to handle a wide range of tasks and situations. Empowerment means people having power and control over their own lives. Because that's the literal meaning. If you think they are vulnerable, they are by definition, not empowered.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 10:17 PM
2

Women are empowered and have agency... that is until you don't think they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 10:09 PM

What hilariously missing is how there's no question of her friends (or her) being unqualified or shitty for the men they are chasing. It assumes they are perfect already.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 09:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter