TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jay10033 Archive

View 1 post and 5,592 comments by jay10033 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
52

Debatejay10033/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 01:50 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 5,592 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

This is called treating men as emotional tampons.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:49 AM
1

We're talking about dating. I didn't love someone just because I went on a date with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:47 AM
13

No, I don't go on dates to just have conversation and meet randos.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:42 AM
16

And what's the issue with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:39 AM
8

So basically everyone is a friend. Why would we be dating at that point?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 01:38 AM
13

You shouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 12:26 PM
1

Women have been programmed to believe that men think sex is everything, so they wield it as a weapon in their favor when they want, using it to shame, criticize, even calling straight men gay when they don't get what they want. Watch what happens when a man rejects a woman sexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:06 PM
2

You also know most women won’t accept the bare minimum of just being able to make half of rent. They in fact call that a "roommate".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 09:34 PM
3

Anecdotally I’ve seen men say they want their sons to have it so they’ll get laid more. I wonder who is setting that standard. Sort of like the increase in height surgeries since women won't entertain a 5'4 dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:20 PM
-1

I'll go one further and say they want/encourage male genital mutilation for the aesthetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:12 PM
1

What labor are you expected to perform while dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:05 PM
2

Women often say men's bodies are ugly without anyone claiming they are misandrist. Try again. Your reasoning fails.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 09:22 PM
1

Have you ever asked? Have I asked if they were being abused? No. But I have lifelong friends who I am very close with who share intimate issues and no, abuse wasn't one of them. Not to mention, many don't even know they're being abused, especially considering that there are several different types of abuse that can take place within a relationship and multiple different types of relationships that can take place between two people or multiple people. Don't redefine abuse to fit your narrative. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 01:35 PM
1

Your friends sure know how to pick them or maybe it's the people you surround yourself with because surely not every single woman I know has been in an abusive relationship. In fact, it's more of a rarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 01:30 PM
2

Are all your friends in abuse shelters?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 11:59 AM
–

Got ya
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 09:38 PM
18

Generally, it's only worthwhile discussing democracies.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 09:38 PM
4

It's not worthwhile to choose laws from theocracies.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 09:33 PM
–

Why are random words capitalized?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 09:26 PM
1

So the initial comment was bullshit? That's my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 07:47 PM
1

Are you sure you’re not conflating the study that includes lesbians having been divorced from men and experienced domestic violence at the hands of men before they got in any relationships with women? It has to do with this statement. You called them lesbians, not bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 07:46 PM
3

The problem is not a gender. It's the reasons for divorce: infidelity, financial difficulties, abuse, regular limits of a relationship. There are many reasons and "working on your marriage" is not a magic phrase to make shit better. Yet your earlier paragraphs contradict this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 07:45 PM
2

There are no absolutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 07:41 PM
3

Sure, but the comment you seem to be defending is a definitive claim that lesbians get married at a younger age.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:32 PM
4

So women are not born lesbian? They are made that way via DV from men? That's the new theory?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:14 PM
5

Explain the divorce rate of homosexual men through your lens of coercion. I'm not sure why the quick marriage among women is a justification for you. Seems to say women are reckless at choosing partners, ignoring red flags along the way. Sounds like hedonism.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:09 PM
1

What does this have to do with the average age of marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:08 PM
1

Have you compared to the level of trauma predating heterosexual relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:06 PM
0

What even tells you, that couples that do not divorce are getting along well? Because divorce is a threshold event. Whether you like it or not, it is a pretty good proxy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:05 PM
5

Lesbian couples tend to move in with each other much faster and take big life steps much faster. I don't know why you think this is a justification.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:01 PM
3

It still holds the same implication. An equal amount of bad relationships leading to a higher divorce rate than other categories does not track. Assume a simple model where you ascribe blame to one party or another for a "bad" relationship. And a bad relationship leads to divorce. A higher divorce rate implies there are more women doing "bad" things to end the relationship. Someone would need to work through how it makes statistical sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 02:55 PM
1

Is this childishness being exhibited now? Lol. You know what. Sorry I triggered you so much. Didn't mean to short circuit your brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:21 PM
1

but I do feel like you’re getting a little bothered by the mere mention of the horrible event I described for some reason This. No one gives a fuck how you feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:17 PM
2

Exactly. Maybe then they can realize how ridiculous this proposition is in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:07 PM
1

😂😂😂 seriously. Just answer the question. I really hate the "you must be mad", "you must be bothered" responses. You're not a.main character in anyone's life. Your words are meaningless to me and will be forgotten in 10 minutes. You're not that important. Just engage in the conversation or don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:06 PM
2

You seem to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:57 PM
1

And men? Oh, you didn't answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:53 PM
1

Ok, how many women are in the woods in her lifetime?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:50 PM
2

Are bears typically in the business of raping humans after tearing them apart? Do bears pretend to help humans? How many women are in the woods on an annual basis?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:49 PM
2

Problem solved. Everyone is discussing a situation that they either a) never experience or b) never will experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:43 PM
0

Ok, how many bears does the hypothetical woman see on a trail in her lifetime? There you go. We're in the land of hypotheticals.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:41 PM
4

Yes. What's the point here?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:35 PM
1

How many bears does the typical woman see on a trail in her lifetime?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:34 PM
-2

If you antagonize a bear, it will attack. Maybe don't antagonize other mammals and you'll be fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 12:32 PM
2

Check your millennial math. Most were becoming young adults during and after the Great Recession.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 08:40 PM
–

I wonder how society progressed when there was no compulsory education
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 06:28 PM
1

Lol. Thank you AI. Throughout history, far more men have died in dangerous jobs than women. This is because men have historically been, and continue to be, overrepresented in the most dangerous occupations, which include roles like logging, fishing, mining, and military service. For example, in recent years, men have accounted for over 90% of fatal occupational injuries. *Historical and contemporary overrepresentation": Men have always performed the majority of physically dangerous jobs, such as…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:59 PM
2

Okay, so the main basis of your argument is that you believe that feminism is the right for women to choose their lives (and we discussed the non-vacuum of choice) and you define MAGA as having absolutely nothing to do with women or women's rights. Yes, that women have agency to decide their lives. Comparing wanting a traditional lifestyle and the set of behaviors that come with it equivalent to anorexia, a mental disorder, is actually telling. Which answers my initial question: You believe MAGA…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:55 PM
1

I mean, sure let me know the jobs that women have been losing their lives en masse in history.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:47 PM
–

Because one person is contributing more financially. If you would like it to be that way, then each person should consume only what they bring into the household and no more.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:45 PM
1

Lead with that. Say you're an engineer for the train system. Leave it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:43 PM
–

No goalposts were changed unless you think being a soldier isn't a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:42 PM
–

That's the economic value. It's objective and market based. It's worth as much as someone is willing to pay for the labor. I'm not using another fuzzy measure that's a matter of opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:36 PM
2

It's an economic movement that says immigrants are the source of low wages, tariffs will onshore previously offshored manufacturing jobs and overregulation is stifling economic growth. It promoted closed borders and an American first approach to filling jobs, regardless of whether American citizens are skilled to do such jobs. Hope that helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:33 PM
–

I can measure the value in terms of dollars per hour.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:30 PM
1

I just defined MAGA.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:24 PM
1

Women use the bachelor degree as a signaling mechanism to stay away from blue collar workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:23 PM
–

And women throughout history, have also died with no offspring doing dangerous jobs. Ah yes, all those female soldiers we heard about.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:20 PM
1

They're both in Project 2025. What do you define MAGA as, if you don't define it by Project 2025's standards? Project 2025's authors are not "MAGA". It's the Heritage Foundation. Dismantling the Education department for example wasn't MAGA. That was on a Republican wishlist for decades. I can counter that Trump said he's the greatest supporter of women - are we to take that as a counter to your point? The fact that they use female spokespersons doesn't mean they don't want women to submit to men…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:19 PM
–

Ok. So are most of the comments here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:06 PM
–

You do understand men throughout history have died with no offspring, by doing dangerous jobs, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:03 PM
2

I'm trying to understand how women are oppressed under your rubric. For one thing, the lifestyle that MAGA promotes is not "traditional", as it only barely existed for like two decades in the mid 1900s. Which part of MAGA are you referring to? The part where Marjorie Taylor Greene is a congresswoman and Pam Bondi is the top law enforcement agent in the country? Otherwise, a woman not having an income in her own name is not in her best interest, unless she is taking steps to mitigate the husband'…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:02 PM
–

You don't think CEOs are busting their ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:53 PM
–

? Is that the part you're responding to, because I said CEO?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:04 PM
–

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:53 PM
–

This is also a matter of opinion. If the engineer didn't design the roads, buildings and homes, no one would be able to do much of anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:53 PM
–

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:52 PM
–

The engineer's time is more valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:38 PM
–

Women want an HR job to make as much as a stressful software engineer job, but women on average don’t want to do the actual software engineer job. This is the part that's unsaid. They want the cushy air conditioned office job where they are talking about feelings while making as much as the CEO or sewage treatment worker.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:36 PM
1

So do you believe choosing to live a traditional lifestyle is self harm? What aspects of maga are contrary to what you wrote?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:30 PM
2

Do you believe feminism means the right for a woman to determine her own outcome in life?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:18 PM
1

They are doing both.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:28 PM
3

But she's the one having multiple children with multiple men. She carries the burden of pregnancy as ya like to say. Women take all the risk, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:53 PM
3

Yes, so one would think she would select better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:50 PM
2

It means women are more likely to have children by men who already have children. 15% of men have children with multiple partners. Almost double the amount of women, 30% have children with multiple partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:47 PM
-2

Are you making the claim that you can't be MAGA and a feminist? This can be easily disproven.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:45 PM
1

For men: Prevalence: Approximately 15% of men will have children with multiple women by age 40. Associated factors: This is more common among men with lower incomes, less education, and those who were incarcerated or whose first birth was unintended and occurred outside of a marital or cohabiting union. Relationship: Men with children by multiple partners may have a higher number of total children, and some studies indicate higher levels of relationship instability. For women The likelihood of h…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:39 PM
1

I already refuted your question. It's not my fault you can't read.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:31 PM
1

Newsflash, they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:31 PM
-4

If people lie in job interviews, this is no different.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 05:14 AM
1

Yes, I know your ancestry. You wrote about it. This was the crux of your argument. Having ancestors who weren't shit. Again, you wrote about your ancestry. You chose one example of that ancestry. You're ain't shit grandfather. I never called him your whole ancestry. So trying to add words to clear up your dumb response.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 05:12 AM
2

Future has 7 children. You're saying baby mother #3-7 were misinformed?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 05:05 AM
1

I called your grandad your ancestor. He's in your ancestry. I don't understand why you got so triggered at that, so much that you would bring up statistics and claim I don't know ancestry. Lol. This is very sad. I argued your other point. You're ain't shit grandma thought he was good enough to have babies for. But again, you can't speak for her decision making.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:18 AM
1

This was when I said your grandpa was your ancestor 😂. You can't even remember your own arguments. My granddad is one person. You clearly don’t know the definition of ancestry. (I’m not surprised.) Tbh you shouldn’t expect bc I can’t imagine a woman would even want you. No wonder you have low standards. Ok. I’ve already said I’m not responsible for my grandma’s decisions. And that doesn’t refute my point that living on sandwiches and choosing not to clean after yourself is lazy LOL (it even has …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:03 AM
1

I answered that question : I was talking about the dudes who are lazy, and my granddad is the one out of infinitely many in my ancestry who is. Ah, accepting he's your ancestor. How refreshing. How would the rest fit when they are good, hardworking men who can cook if they need to? You make no sense, but I expect that now. Ah, so a small minority of your ancestors ain't shit but you chose that example to make your point of how men are? Except for you of course. You think you're the image of a "g…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:33 AM
3

Also you hear about the extra emotional labor a woman put in to organize an entire day with a complete agenda on her bf's day off when her bf didn't want to do anything, and they talk as if the bf was lazy and shouldn't be anything except thankful when it was basically work for him to go along with it. Emphasis mine This part is the most sickening. Being dragged to hang out with awful friends, make small talk, do ridiculous things that you don't care about and still having to keep a sunny dispos…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:26 AM
8

It's not that they don't understand. They don't care. Most modern women have deep narcissistic traits where they have a high estimation of what they do (even though it may be minor to a relationship) and are completely blind to what a man does in a relationship. This is why, although everyone can objectively agree money is important to living, a woman these days would say a man working too much, while she does very little or stays at home, is her performing emotional labor because she has to ele…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:22 AM
2

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:15 AM
1

Stop it. You know your arguments are terrible which is why you couldn't answer any questions. You keep deflecting and now you're trying to save yourself with "well you didn't refute this part that I'm now asking you to refute 40 minutes later!!!". You realize that you couldn't keep up and now you're attempting to change the conversation. I asked you a very simple question - of all your ancestors, why'd you choose the ain't shit one rather than the good ones?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:14 AM
1

You all love to say for women being in no relationship is better than being in a bad relationship. By that logic, having no parents is better than having two who don't want you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:12 AM
2

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 11:59 PM
-2

Give the child up for adoption.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:57 PM
2

You can also choose to gather information in the face of imperfect information. That's called vetting.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:52 PM
-4

Get an abortion
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:51 PM
0

You guys believe men I do believe men. What's the problem with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:50 PM
4

we are understanding Happy you understand why.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:47 PM
9

Yes. Blame the victims when they are reckless. If you are Future's 2nd through last baby mother, blame yourself. He's a known quantity. I don't understand how you don't get this. When you have knowledge of something, you have the responsibility of acting with that knowledge. If you want to act stupid and get knocked up by a deadbeat, don't come complaining anywhere about it. Shut the fuck up and live a quiet life of pain. We don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:44 PM
5

Wait - you mean the men who have multiple baby mothers that was known to the woman who decided they wanted to be #5? A serial killer will continue to kill. It's what they do. But when the serial killer is particularly looking for people who wear red shirts, and you wear a red shirt everyday thinking you'll be immune, yes, don't be surprised when people say you were dumb for wearing a red shirt.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:39 PM
3

The solution is to not play the game. Attention is currency. Stop paying it. Let them wallow and figure out what their priorities are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:25 PM
1

So women are attracted to shitty men - you're just trying to justify it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 07:06 PM
2

I can actually refute that point if you would like me to. That would be changing the topic, but I'm happy to.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:56 PM
1

No, you connected it to society, not OP. There's is no AC to grind, it's factual. Let's get back to the question that was actually asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:55 PM
1

Ok, let's accept that as true (I didn't think it is; but let's say it is). I go back to my first question - why is the society argument pertinent for women when no other society argument regarding their behavior and presentation are?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:03 PM
2

I didn’t say you agreed. I said you couldn’t refute it. Who said I couldn't refute? You unilaterally claim this? Lol. It was not important to the line of inquiry. Do you understand words?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:00 PM
2

But you spoke about women specifically, that they do better without sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:30 PM
3

Your words: So you already forgot the beginning of this where we established that the principle of a man doing these things for himself makes him a better family-making partner I ask you where I did this, since you used "we". Where did I agree with your principle? Simple question I asked you. Now you're dancing around the question like we're at the club. Just copy/paste it. It's simple. The way to establish a principle in a debate forum is for one to present a principle or idea that the other ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:29 PM
2

I wasn’t wrong? Look it up in the dictionary, for God sake. From the dictionary (Google to be exact): An ancestor is any person from whom you are descended, such as a parent, grandparent, or even more distant relative. I don’t speak for my grandma. You’re just stuck on that bc you can’t successfully argue against me. :) So you don't know why your grandma gave it up to your ain't shit grandpa. Ok. Making progress. Yeah, that’s EXACTLY what a low IQ person would say, given that any normal (or high…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:25 PM
3

You said "we decided on a principle". Just copy/paste what principle I agreed with you on. It's simple. I don't need your paraphrasing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:19 PM
3

Maybe you can't read. Quote where I agreed with you. I'll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:13 PM
3

Who is "we"?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:11 PM
5

Lol, now you resort to the insulting language. First you were wrong about your ain't shit grandpa being your ancestor. Next, you can't answer why your grandma would fuck and start a family with such a shitty person Now, you can't seem to answer why you chose to focus on the one ain't shit man in your lineage, even when admitting "there are billions" of ancestors you have to choose from" (talk about low IQ). YOU brought up ancestry, and YOU focused on my granddad, saying he was the only one of my…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:10 PM
1

I’m happily married, but fewer people now want either marriage or family. Great! It’s great for individuals who are happy with this in their personal life, women seem to do better without sex than men, but it’s not great for society in general. Nothing survives forever. Why are women sacrificing for "society"? I thought in all other areas, you push back against what society cares about, like the "patriarchy", "body image" or "beauty standards". Ya go your own way on all that stuff that makes you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:52 PM
3

Then don't marry someone who eats PB&J sandwiches. That simple. Who cares if they want a family? Lots of people want a billion dollars, they don't get it. Women get to make decisions on who they procreate with. If they don't want to create a family with a PB&J eating man, don't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:48 PM
3

He’s in it but he doesn’t represent billions. You have shit ancestry somewhere as well, guaranteed. We all do. Nah, I don't. You clearly do. One who you clearly saw and were influenced by since you know so much. You agreed with him, so if he’s shit so are you, Who said I agreed with your ain't shit grandpa. I asked why your grandma fucked him? You have an answer to that? And your lack of understanding of statistics is your issue. I won’t teach you basics bc to you even first grade math would be …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:44 PM
6

Why are they asking? Just don't. I don't get this. You don't like meat, you become vegetarian. You don't discuss amongst yourselves. You make the decision and go from there. Someone asks you if you want a steak, you say no, I didn't eat meat. No dissertation, no discussion. You don't want to be with men, make your decision and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:34 PM
5

Your ain't grandpa is in your ancestry. Glad you know what ancestry means now. Now ask your grandma why she fucked him. Is she equally ain't shit as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:51 AM
5

Because I'm wondering why you care about men who eat PB&j relationships and the women who get with them. You seem strangely obsessed about how they will be relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:49 AM
4

Is your aint shit grandad not in your ancestry? He was good enough for your grandma to let him fuck him, so why don't you ask her why she did?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:47 AM
3

You're the one complaining about "well what happens when men who are satisfied with pb&j sandwiches get a family?!??!?". Why the fuck do you care? How does that impact you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:45 AM
1

Hope you find the crumbs of pussy you've been looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:41 AM
5

And I know this bc I’m a man and my granddad is like this. The man would live on sandwiches when he had no wife. Guy doesn’t even know how to do dishes. Yes, I know your ancestry. You wrote about it. This was the crux of your argument. Having ancestors who weren't shit. You created the tangent to comparing basic simple stuff to living in a mansion, and you tell ME to keep up? Yes. Keep up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:41 AM
2

You literally brought up women and their standards. Did you do that to just turn around and say "men do it too! Haha!" Grow the fuck up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:36 AM
8

You were talking about eating pb&j sandwiches. Keep up. Just because your ancestors were developmentally challenged, doesn't mean most men are. Take it up with the women who procreated with them and created offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:33 AM
2

I don't complain about anyone's standards. But I will point and laugh when they are on TikTok crying about being alone, how no one wants them and how they are going to be single forever. They had sky high standards but forgot to look in the mirror and see the person looking back at them didn't meet this same standards. I'm in a happy relationship, thank you very much.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:03 AM
9

Are you dense? Someone who has crafted a simple life for themselves now has to do more complicated shit because you think you need to have 14 throw pillows on your couch? You're one of those fools who told people they needed to be in mcmansions when they were happily in a 1 bdrm apt. Now they have to clean up 4 beds and 3 baths and are unhappy. You're complaining that someone doesn't want complicated shit in your life? Some people think your life is terrible and want no parts to it. While at the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:01 AM
7

Women also tend to come into your space and have already designed plans for how they will change it, by mostly making things more complicated than they already are, adding to the burden of upkeep.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:56 AM
2

This is very true. I keep my home spotless. It's a passive matter. What matters most is the experience that the women I date have. It's simply against the backdrop of a nice home. They still want "experiences".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:52 AM
5

Boo hoo. Men who are stay at home dads are seen as weak, feckless men. They are expected to work. Men are seen as the primary provider. Women are praised for being "boss babes". What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:44 AM
6

Again, why do you care? Why are joining the victim parade when you just said your personal experience is not this? What are you hoping to achieve?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:41 AM
9

Adjusted for shit that's unnecessary, I would probably say it's about even. Just because someone wants to fluff 8 pillows on the bed with a complicated duvet when a simple bed set would do is likely the source of a lot of this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:40 AM
7

Then die alone. There's a solution to everything. If it isn't worth it, don't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:35 AM
8

Who cares? Who are you to prescribe a more complicated life for someone to live? There are tech people drinking soylent all day because they have other priorities. You want them to focus on making coq au vin in their homes when they don't give a damn what they eat. People have different priorities. Just because it doesn't match yours means nothing. Solution - find someone who matches your priorities and stop fucking complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:35 AM
10

Why the fuck would she get with him?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:25 AM
2

Sounds like someone who wants a simple life and can live off a PB&J sandwich. That should tell you something.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:24 AM
10

Sounds like you want to be a victim. Have some agency, pick a route, own it, and shut the hell up about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:23 AM
3

I don't how old your granpa is, but he sounds developmentally challenged. Maybe your mother's husband doesn't want to celebrate Christmas and put a ridiculous amount of decorations. Why are you ironing your friend's boyfriend's shirt? Are you fucking him? Why wouldn't you be cooking for your boyfriend in the future? Are you expecting not to cook at all, ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:21 AM
–

Blue pill personality fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:55 AM
7

They're "settling".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 07:53 AM
1

Glad you just read your posts again.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/25 03:34 AM
1

Lol, ok. So, let me get this right. You're advising: don't seek out people who like you and who make you jump through the gauntlet just to go on a date, while you see them give everyone else the easy yes. Be exploited for what you can provide them, when they rejected you in the past. Don't worry about reciprocity. I have a lot of experience with dating. I'm with someone who actually likes me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 06:50 PM
1

I don't want anything. It's simply a recognition of how things are - observed reality. You folks are the legacy kid telling the inner public school kid that he just needed to study harder to get into Harvard. That's what AF|BB refers to. You can ignore that reality if you want to. And yes, one would be cognizant that you be with people who actually like you. Not some resource leech that settles for you because they believe their time is running out or that makes you jump through 50 hoops to show…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 04:53 PM
3

In the work world, you'll call it nepotism when the amount of effort the CEOs son needs to get a job is far less than the pull himself up by the bootstraps mid level school kid. You didn't view nepotism as a good thing. In Higher Ed, it's called legacy or daddy wrote a big check. I would already think you'd find that unfair.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 04:43 PM
11

Why do you act as if what you do at 18 is completely disconnected from your life experience and results at 30?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 04:39 PM
1

Why would you assume all other women would be failures just because you were a failure in your relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 11:16 PM
–

Have you tried spending it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 04:12 PM
–

Well if you're going to ask why, you're going to be told.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 04:10 PM
–

Poor decision making
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 04:08 PM
3

And women are not complaining about not getting the man they want, There is an entire public diary online that proves your statement wrong. You have to be delusional to say this. Women are complaining about how men are in general. You and women who think like you are the problem. You are ok generalizing men, but you can't come up with a single general criticism of women. This is "women are wonderful" effect in action. Listen to yourself. Men are the problem, this is why women don't want them. If…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 02:15 AM
1

No one is saying to let the guys oYf the hook. You are the reason there is a gender divide. Rather than there be an objective process by which to adjudicate an accusation, you care who has the best PR team to win the argument. According to you, it was ok that Emmett Till was murdered due to a woman's false accusation because his murder doesn't matter - it's for the greater good to believe all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 02:05 AM
1

That's how the justice system works. Any other way is a witch hunt.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 10:00 PM
0

This really sounds like believe women even if they're lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 08:58 PM
1

And that's fine. Those aren't usually the people going on a social media campaign.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 08:57 PM
1

They don't have to be made public. Just like the victim's names in these cases are often hidden for their own protection. The court system has ways to have closed door cases. It need only be public to the attorney representing the accused.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 08:03 PM
3

Would you also extend this to cases where the accuser was just found ‘not guilty’ tho? Because people can be found ‘not guilty’ for a multitude of reasons, and only means they were found not guilty in the court of law. They could still have actually committed the crime, and they weren’t falsely accused just because there wasn’t enough evidence, for example. No. In that case, the case is public record and anyone can see what happened. The issue is with accusations that are not tested in court or …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:52 PM
0

I don't disagree with any of that. Court is highly technical and you need to get all the components right to prove guilt.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:49 PM
2

About name blind - okay, i don't see how it's possible It's very much possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:47 PM
0

You can prosecute. You just need evidence. If you can't prosecute, you don't have a case.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:42 PM
3

There needs to be remedies just like if someone's identity is stolen. A letter from the state that follows them saying they were falsely accused. Need news coverage to place statements on their website as to the current state of things [it was determined x was falsely accused by y] with a link pointing to said letter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:40 PM
6

Distinction without a difference. Certainly by "believe women", it wasn't meant to be read as "Believe some women".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:35 PM
6

No one has to say most accusations have to be false. Only enough that begins to call into question the nature of these accusations. You don't ask whether most commercial flights crash, but you'd certainly question and feel some type of way if 3 commercial flights crashed in a row. The point is if there is a critical mass (far less than 51%) of false accusations that have occurred, it's a problem, just as if you would be troubled if you saw the post conviction exoneration rate in a justice system…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:32 PM
8

Seriously. The shrieking on here by people defending her was ridiculous. The same with Roda Osman who claimed she got in the face with a brick by a man. That is what becomes dangerous when attention is a commodity. Wrongfully accusing people to increase their own profile. This should put to bed the call to believe all women. We need to be more focused on finding the truth. I doubt those who were making excuses here will say they have egg on their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:15 PM
–

The problem is she doesn't keep her dissatisfaction to herself. She joins the cacophony of voices saying men are defective because she can't achieve some ridiculous standard, then jobs with the other voices of equally delusional women creating a social cry that is somehow men's fault that they can't achieve their delusional fantasies.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 12:19 AM
–

Treat them the same way we treat schizophrenics.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 12:16 AM
–

Having rye bread as someone going hungry is different than having no bread at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 12:08 AM
2

Lol. Refute my made up claim please! This style of debating is just terrible. You get to make something up then tell everyone else to show evidence to the contrary. Here's the evidence - I said so - you're wrong. Holds as much weight as yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 12:05 AM
–

It's sad really. And you see it in many other contexts, especially in the Therapy Industrial Complex. When a woman is old, single and has trouble staying in a long term relationship, the party line is: women are happier single! Look at the data! Being in a relationship with a man is dangerous! But when men are generally single: there's a male loneliness crisis! Men need to do better to be in relationships! Men aren't emotionally mature enough! They will come up (and others will go along) with ps…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 11:57 PM
1

That no one can actually say they would or wouldn't do anything in the absence of fear. Religious moral codes are fear based. Your parents instilling a moral code is fear based.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:50 PM
1

For example, he could have said religion or personal values, or his parents views towards him. Which are often fear based.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:38 PM
1

You really think that was a smart answer? Fear is by definition embedded in the social fabric. It's impossible to remove that feature. By saying "regardless of that fear", it's fucking meaningless since you don't know what the absence of that fear looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:17 PM
1

Is a fear of external enforcement the only thing keeping you from disrespecting people’s bodies and rights? How would one know this if the alternative is impossible?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 08:02 PM
1

So what was the point of your question that started this if the alternative is impossible?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 07:39 PM
2

Sure, but start there.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:34 PM
1

You wrote a whole lot of words when saying "I made it up" would have worked just fine. Sex, having children, and child support are completely foreign concepts and unconnected to you. Got it. Ladies and gentlemen, don't fuck your parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:21 PM
2

Why is it not possible? Remove laws that enforce gender equality. No court, no police force enforcing those specific rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:00 PM
1

You can easily quote what I said rather than making shit up, since it's in writing. But I get, fucking your mother early fucks your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:58 PM
2

What did I say that I'm denying?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:46 PM
2

According to what argument exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:37 PM
1

No, but clearly you do since that seems to have been on your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:35 PM
1

If there were no men, your argument would be a moot point given humanity would not exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:35 PM
1

I'm not trying anything. Restricting liberty is fine by your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:34 PM
1

So the solution is to make sex a crime outside of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:31 PM
2

The only way to find out is to remove external enforcement and see what happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:17 PM
3

They seem to come from the "trust me bro" school of philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:19 PM
-4

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:42 AM
-1

Pussy is plug that makes their equations work.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:40 AM
-1

You take a shit on your bath mat? And who said "months at a time"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:37 AM
1

Show your research concerning this.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:35 AM
1

Women like you hate science and research.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:30 AM
1

I love when people make a confident claim, loud and proud, and when they're pressed on it, they deflect. Look at the goat over there!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 10:03 PM
1

Still deflecting the question I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 09:03 PM
1

And what makes you so special? That your relationship status is divorced from your happiness yet everyone else you "observe" is maligned with such a curse?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 07:20 PM
1

Glad you understand that your relationship status is not indicative of your happiness. I'm glad you could process that for yourself, but can make wild assumptions about someone else. I guess you're special in that way. Why do you think you're special in this way? What is unique about you that your relationship status is not indicative of your happiness?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 07:08 PM
7

No. This makes no sense whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:08 PM
8

You're implying I'm here because I'm unhappy. You just be here for the same reason. Single, lonely and unhappy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:08 PM
9

People in relationships don't have opinions? At least you admit that you aren't happy. I'm sorry for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 04:57 AM
4

Unlike you, I'm in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 02:29 AM
14

Getting married and being marriage material are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:28 AM
13

If she is a whore, she is not marriage material.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 10:04 PM
2

So women?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 03:02 PM
2

This already happens with sports.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 02:59 PM
–

Women are narcissists who rewrite the rules of what they want depending on how they slept the night before. When they work, the money is for them which is why by and large, women want men who make more than they do, while not realizing the complete irony that they are the bum in that situation. They are consumers/destroyers of wealth, wherever they go. Ask yourself - who is most likely to reject the idea of a prenup? If a relationship doesn't financially benefit them, they complain. So no, this …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 01:35 PM
4

It's because the bar for women is in hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 11:04 PM
3

Good for you. And I assume children are not starving or in poverty because you don't see it either right?!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 09:23 PM
5

Ah, so here you are on social media, telling us what real life looks like. Oh wise one, go ahead and tell us about this wonderful world!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 08:29 PM
2

I agree with you. And might I add, they raped their slaves as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:52 PM
0

Seriously. They lather themselves in olive oil then make these wild claims. Try to catch them they say - it's a fool's errand.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:50 PM
2

Because your explanations are bullshit. You mentally have convinced yourself that the only people who were discriminated against were women and it was men doing it. Although women held slaves, they were the ones oppressed. Although women got black men killed, they were the ones discriminated against. Although Asian men and women were put in internment camps, for you, it was only women to you. Although affirmative action benefited women more than any other group, they are oppressed. Although wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:51 PM
1

It’s not a negative that can’t be proven. You need to go back to school. Here's your answer, since you can't seem to process this. Because something else did. In order for you to believe that women’s oppression and discrimination didn’t piss them off You still haven't shown how women in modern times in the western world are subjugated and oppressed. You used the example of the crime of sexual assault. By that rubric, there are many unsolved murders of men, so men are oppressed. cause them to fig…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:42 PM
0

Define love first so we can understand what you're claiming is low.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:19 PM
1

I don't care about your treatise on AI. If you don't know that AI doesn't understand nuance and makes mistakes, you're just dumb. Show. Your. Work. You should be able to provide a source saying that misogyny didn’t create misandry This is the dumbest thing you wrote. I'm not proving a negative. You made an affirmative statement. Prove it. Especially when I made it clear I love men and think misandry is wrong. I don't care about your feelings. Your feelings mean absolutely nothing to me. Prove wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:18 PM
1

Hey.... Please quote where he says he wants to "have whatever he wants". Dominate means to win, convincingly. He's wrong for wanting to win as well? I'm waiting....
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:13 PM
2

What a crash out. If you think this is "oppression", you must think a splinter is a gunshot wound. This is very sad. You're making up a definition of oppression and throwing everything at the wall that may stick, even if it makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:10 PM
5

Maybe, just maybe, it's observed in the real world. You not experiencing it is meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:05 PM
1

Point to the study/analysis. You're really bad at this. I'm not wasting anymore of my time with you. You crashed out over being asked to show your work 😂. This is sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:14 AM
0

AI is turning brains to mush, I swear. You won't read a single original source, but you want Gemini to summarize it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:13 AM
1

Using AI that says social.media posts have increased (partly because those communities are no longer moderated) is not evidence from an objective baseline. You claim there was more than before.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:12 AM
1

No one's offended. Show your work.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:10 AM
1

If it's that obvious, you're typing a lot but not showing any sources. Show your claim that it was women only who were oppressed throughout history.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:10 AM
1

You made the claim that I was wrong. So prove it. Ha ha. I spewed bullshit, now show I'm wrong. Not how this works buddy. You made various claims. Show your work that misogyny has increased from some objective baseline. Show that misandry was caused by misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:09 AM
2

Quote him directly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:07 AM
1

You're really bad at this you know. You can keep asking loaded questions. I'm still going to ask you to show your work.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:06 AM
1

No I didn’t you did. You made the claim that misogyny and thousands of years of oppression didn’t cause women to become bitter towards men. Where? Quote me directly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:05 AM
3

Your original claim was that misogyny didn’t cause misandry. I made no such claim. I asked you to show your work. So far it's been from the "trust me bro" school of history. You're not really good at this. You can't even show anything to back a basic claim you've made. It’s common sense that men oppressed women and took away their rights for thousands of years and common sense that would obviously make them angry Oh, only women had their rights taken away for thousands of years? Interesting. Ple…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:04 AM
1

You made the claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:59 AM
1

More SIGN language because you can't defend your statements, and that's sad. You fail at debating. No men are not entitled to have whatever the hell they want. You honestly don’t sound like a good person to begin with. This is where you become emotional because your line of sight becomes myopic. The comment said "do whatever I want as a man" meaning defining his own manhood. You see " entitled to have whatever they want". You can't even read well. Or maybe you can and you honestly believe men do…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:58 AM
1

Oh, so women were enslaved under chattel slavery? Is that your argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:54 AM
1

Common sense clearly isn't common. Show an event, historical evolution, something. Not some axiomatic statement that "of course misogyny created misandry". If you don't know, say I don't know. I just said that it wouldn’t exist if not for misogyny Because it’s literally women reaction to being fed up of oppression. Show your work. You're making these flailing claims with no historical backing. Which still continues today despite women having equal rights. It’s significant in work place, SA cases…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:53 AM
-2

I didn't need your opinion. Show your claim where misogyny causes misandry. Your other link doesn't show misogyny "not decreasing". You have to do better than Google AI. Point to a research study with a baseline of "misogyny" and an increase from said baseline.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:37 AM
-1

Whatever he wants. That's what he said.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:30 AM
-1

Misogyny has not decreased at all and misogyny created misandry. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:28 AM
16

I want pure equality. No picking and choosing the parts you like. Pure unadulterated equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:19 AM
1

I didn't know you were right next to me to see my state of mind. Why are you so angry?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 11:53 PM
–

This is such a terrible take, but let's dismantle this one by one. I am a man and I have noticed this with the following examples. I'm confused - is this statement an appeal to authority? Men see sex as something being done to women rather than it being something both men and women do. So because of this anything a woman has to say about dating dynamics is automatically invalid to most men. You cannot be serious with this comment. Women most often vote sex as something that exclusively benefits …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 11:41 PM
2

No, because you're the one complaining about it. See how that works. You're the author of your own demise.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 07:00 PM
2

You know the best way to have men "shut the fuck up" if in fact that's what's happening? Don't participate. Leave. Avert your eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:56 PM
3

This is a debate sub. If you don't want men talking, probably go to the femcel sub or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:15 PM
3

Most men do. Women are the ones harping about emotional sensitivity and all that other bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:12 PM
3

Your first mistake was assuming men wanted to be vulnerable. That's women wanting men to act like women. So the ones who are vulnerable are giving you what you want and picking up crumbs of pussy along the way. You are the authors of your own demise.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:06 PM
2

It's made up for those who touch grass.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:01 PM
–

No one even comes close to bitching at the level women do in public that no one wants them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 05:44 PM
5

People like consistency. Practice what you preach. If you let garbage dick in you and want top of the line successful dick as well, no successful person will take that offer. Who wants to follow a bum's sloppy no standard seconds? Especially if he leaves his seed behind. Not I said the fly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 05:42 PM
1

Then why the fuck do men expect us to tolerate that shit from men? Make up your mind. Men aren't vulnerable remember?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 05:38 PM
1

Men are doers, not talkers. Why would we want to hear women whine and become raging narcissists who hijack our issues to talk more about themselves and use their faux therapy tactics.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:33 PM
9

No relationship is "equal".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:17 PM
6

Your questions make zero sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:11 PM
–

Are you talking why: Remember that's why you never follow a woman's advice for dating if you are a man, they will be fucking any tom dick harry in a one nighter but ask you to get a job , have a personality, get rich , get a proper job , dress so and so which I am not saying it doens't work ..
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:06 PM
1

Lol - she's literally asking do you believe your lying eyes???
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:59 PM
–

Absolutely not jealous of women like that. I pity them. I would never consider a woman like that for a relationship or anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:57 PM
–

Actively getting dick from a hobosexual then saying you deserve better is nasty work.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:53 PM
2

What makes you think he wants a 40 year old woman and cares about what she's attracted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:46 PM
12

They yasss queen that woman to death
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:43 PM
1

My bad, I posted under the wrong automod.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:42 PM
-1

It's older women's heightened overestimation of their worth in the sexual marketplace. They need something to cling to so they are indirectly saying older women are better. It's not only a revenge fantasy, it's heightened delusion and grasping at the last straws of sexual value.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:41 PM
–

You hear this when they say "I need a man who's ambitious" but they've been in a multi year FWB situationship with a hobosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:38 PM
–

It's older women's heightened overestimation of their worth in the sexual marketplace. They need something to cling to so they are indirectly saying older women are better. It's not only a revenge fantasy, it's heightened delusion and grasping at the last straws of sexual value.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 02:35 PM
0

What does "same socioeconomic level as your family" mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 07:35 AM
5

I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 06:18 PM
0

I'd agree, if not for the constant messaging we get to from women to create "better men", to call them out, etc. We know what that means.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 06:15 PM
1

Relationally, it does not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 04:51 PM
1

I think you should also look up the word analogy to get a sense of what that is. I'll give you a hint - it's not literal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 04:22 PM
21

Women don't want to be educated sadly. What they want is for other men to make the toxic ain't shit men they are attracted to better for them and only them. It's sad really.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 04:16 PM
1

The store is the person being approached, the person getting hit on. Generally that is women. Hope that helps! Edit - I also see you ignored all of the very simple insurance examples that make a similar point!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 04:13 PM
3

I'm not surprised you don't get it. I suggest you look up adverse selection and moral hazard. Your response is nonsensical. You have the same thinking as people who say they don't get car insurance because they are great drivers. By making decisions that get you taken advantage of, then complaining that you were taken advantage of, with no change in your behavior, you're abdicating responsibility for yourself. Risk reduction techniques should be part of the package. That's why women who have the…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:56 PM
2

Yea - your position is at odds with the majority of humans. In every case where something similar has happened, the store owner would be at fault for creating the conditions that led to violence. Anywho, there has always been a moral hazard and adverse selection issue in dating. It exists in most human endeavors. It is up to the person bearing the risk to put tools in place to reduce their exposure. For example, life insurance companies have health exams or car insurance companies have age/educa…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:24 PM
0

Answer the question first.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:09 PM
1

You opened a store and say you are giving out 10 free iPhones (or some popular thing). A bunch of people show up - some good, some terrible. The terrible people begin beating others with bats so they get to the front of the line. You choose to not have any security, no line - it's just pure mayhem outside your store. Who do you think is at fault in that case? Take it one step further. You open your store - see a bunch of bloodied and beaten people on the floor but you see there are 10 people out…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 03:07 PM
1

You can't ask this question because you'll get a bad faith response. It's like trying to wrestle a pig lathered in olive oil. Even though their history has shown that she's let a string of Chads pump and dump to their hearts content, her being with a nerdy engineer is just a sudden shift, the immaculate rethinking, where they are with the nerdy guy because their preferences changed. It's not because they are taking advantage of the nerd and they don't really like him, only his money. It's becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 02:53 PM
1

Of course it won't. But she will find that her resources are not sufficient to support her lifestyle generally or even her retirement, so she will seek out a simp willing to underwrite her until 1) she gets lucky or 2) sufficiently has used the legal system to buttress her financial security and then leave. She begins to give the unattracteds a second look.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 02:48 PM
–

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:43 PM
–

Have you seen the suicide rate among young men? Getting rejected repeatedly because they are who they are - what do you think that leads to?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:32 PM
5

Calling Elder Scroll-less cheeks is the ultimate rape. This person is absolutely bonkers calling everything under the sun rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 07:28 PM
–

I say the same thing when a woman wears a lot of makeup, fake lashes, fake nails, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 07:00 PM
–

"Just be yourself bro" The advice is laughable at best, dangerous at worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 02:33 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 01:25 PM
9

Receiving gifts is an even bigger red flag. It means women want you only for your money.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 01:23 PM
3

I think we equally know.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 03:38 AM
7

It means that loyalty is for sale to the highest bidder.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:53 PM
5

Anyone who disagrees with that basic premise is a misogynist. Loyalty is for sale to the highest bidder. We must just embrace the world we live in and stop being delusional. As the great philosopher Brown once said "These hoes ain't loyal".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:52 PM
3

You have no idea what they were thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:48 PM
10

😂😂😂 those paragons of rule followers.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:44 PM
11

You go to a nice restaurant and eat a perfectly cooked ribeye and drink the best wine - you know it will end, so what's the point? For the experience. It's just your turn, enjoy the ride while it lasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:43 PM
2

but I’ve never heard about a woman using a weapon in real life( rarely I’ve seen it in the news) https://www.live5news.com/2025/02/08/woman-stabs-boyfriend-neck-after-argument-over-wedding-venue-police-say/ https://wcti12.com/news/local/greenville-woman-arrested-for-alleged-knife-assault-on-man https://local21news.com/news/local/lancaster-county-woman-accused-of-stabbing-man-with-steak-knife-police https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/police-woman-attacked-man-knife-215403782.html?ch=1 https://ny…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 09:42 PM
2

But you wrote: A man should never hit a woman no matter what
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 08:06 PM
2

So if a woman is chasing you around the house with a knife, attempting to stab you, you shouldn't hit her to fend her off?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 07:09 PM
1

Reproductive supremacy you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:34 PM
1

Interesting how you left out economic equality. And with these come social, economic and political responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:33 PM
1

👍🏿
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:24 PM
1

Not a rant, a response. Good 👍🏿
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:24 PM
-7

I feel like that's why I posted under the automod. You understand how this sub works?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:23 PM
1

Yes. Because it benefits me. I take care of my own home currently. It's really not that hard. It's called being an adult. No one said life should be easy. You make your decisions and you live with them. As an adult, you take of your responsibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:22 PM
1

I mean, you shouldn't. I don't understand how you think this response changes anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:21 PM
0

I can care less about the birth rate. And I can care less about some magical standards you have. Your results are the only things that matter. If you can't find what you're looking for, you don't qualify for it. It's a hard pill to swallow but no one sees you as you see yourself. You were just delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:20 PM
-3

Exactly. A man should not work himself like a mule and modern day slave just for a woman to claim she isn't happy or they "grew apart" taking years of his hard work in the process. No way. Equality means everyone works. There is no other way. Women are in the labor market - wonderful! Increased labor participation decreases average wages. Thus, women need to work to contribute to maintain the same standard of living.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:16 PM
-1

I agree. Do just that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:12 PM
-4

The broke men need to worry less about having children and more about getting money. Y’all can barely afford a good life alone for yourself and now you wanna torture your future wife and kids too lol. SIGN language to justify laziness. I'm good with my financial situation, earning in the top 3%. Staying at home is an opportunity cost for a woman. If she is out of the workforce 5 years to raise kids, that’s 5 years of experience she’s missing out on to get raise and promotions. Then don't leave t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:11 PM
-3

Who said I don't see value in it. It's not revenue producing. There is no monetary value to it, except to benefit one's self. Yes, I want her to have a job. In that case, you share in the burdens of what it takes to run a home which is first and foremost, money. No money, no home to take care of.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:07 PM
-3

The people who call it financial abuse ignore the idea of tradeoffs. The reality is, it is much easier to spend someone else's money than it is your own. It doesn't matter, marriage or not, having skin in the game means you work, and the time and effort put into work generally translates into being cautious with how your money is spent. An allowance simply balances the playing field. It places reasonable restrictions on how money can be spent by the person earning it. Pretty sure there will be a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 01:59 PM
1

But if you want free food and sex and vibes and experiences, you do have to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 12:51 PM
2

I think you should answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 12:44 PM
2

Why do we need to amplify their voices? They have a voice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 12:43 PM
2

You are completely wrong. They are called white knights because you've considered what they've said and it is usually devoid of logic. One questions why they would hold that Illogical opinion expect to get crumbs of pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 12:41 PM
3

Or assault generally. Doing nothing and being a bystander when a woman is hitting a man, but becoming a knight of the round table when he retaliates.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 12:03 PM
2

Definitionally, you're just wrong. If you were to say people use terms in the wrong way, that's one thing. But the definition is quite clear from a quick Google search: In slang, a "white knight" is a person, often a man, who rushes to defend someone online, particularly a woman, in an unsolicited and excessive way, usually with the motive of gaining romantic or sexual favor. The term is typically derogatory, implying the defender is trying to "rescue" someone who doesn't need rescuing and is mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 11:59 AM
18

In response to a post that starts with "I don't think".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 04:10 PM
7

Do you really think sharing in life's small things, like making someone lunch, makes you a pick me? So men shouldn't pay for dates, pick you up when you're stranded somewhere, help you carry groceries, etc, because that would make him a simp? You want to push the message "never settle" while realizing no one will settle for you. The men you want don't want you, or else you would have him. The results speak for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 03:58 PM
1

Don't let facts get in your way. Folks complain about how the wage disparity, but when you point out a natural analog of that, assuming one believes it, you all of a sudden throw a different rationale. No one forced them to get pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 12:01 PM
-1

Well, generally by men's taxes. But yes, please continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 11:20 AM
5

I'll keep it simple. Women want men who other women want, even in church. Easy exhibit - the preacher is likely fucking multiple women in his flock.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 10:50 AM
6

They would. Look, let's be real. In the Christian tradition, even Eve are the apple and Adam followed suit. And they were created by God's direct hand. You aren't going to tell me that regular men and women, horny as fuck, will suppress it? Why? You have an automatic out, forgiveness! There's no punishment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:37 AM
1

Out of the mouth of babes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:31 AM
3

Again, extremely rare. 98% of men don't get sick from ejaculation. Sorry for your condition though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:26 AM
8

Chads learn early in life what women say and what they do are like Mr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. The UbërChad learns this far earlier in life, using his chad-like skills early in the school environment. He's perfected the art of NSA sex. The average Chad typically learns it later in life, say in his late teens, and realizes he has a harem of women at his disposal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:24 AM
11

Visit a church, lol. Even in a church, the men who are the most wanted are those who have slept with many women in the congregation. Don't get fooled by the okey doke. People in churches are having lots of sex out of wedlock.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 05:20 AM
2

What do you call this? That's only true if a man is past a certain age like 30+. A statement of fact?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 12:37 AM
1

I'd argue, mid-20s the latest.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 12:26 AM
13

The problem is women don't stay around long enough to learn the reasons, so that's a moot point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 11:06 PM
5

This is so off base, it must be rage bait. Women want men who other women want. Men who have social proof with other women. That's why women don't want virgins. No woman wants to be the first test case. It would be a form of settling, which we know women don't want to do. And there's no way you women came up with the term incel, which quite literally means involuntarily celibate, which is a shot at the bow of any male virgin and you have this take.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 11:04 PM
2

Again - please look this up. You don't know what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 07:11 PM
2

No, it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 05:54 PM
2

It doesn't matter because a defense is not required. You can have a defense (for example, if you say I did something in self defense) to explain actions but I can sit at the defense table and not say a single word. The prosecutors have to prove what they are accusing me of. Of course evidence that someone else did it is great, not it's not required. It's not the defenses job to find out who committed a crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 05:52 PM
12

BECAUSE THEY ARE LYING THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 04:20 PM
1

Moving the goalposts so far away, it's hard to take you seriously. This is the literal basis of the legal system. The state accuses someone. The accused must "prove a negative". You just don't understand the law. And now you're saying it's ok to use the legal system to these ends because "humans naturally pick a side".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 04:19 PM
1

Wrong. The accused doesn't have to prove shit. You don't know the law.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 04:14 PM
1

Again, state the facts in this case. Not your hypothetical.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 04:13 PM
1

It wasn't always done. The issue is an accuser can make an accusation, be protected, then choose not to move forward with it, leaving a void that the accused, publicly known, must navigate. The drawback is we, as a public, won't know what prosecutorial powers are being used in our name.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 04:13 PM
2

What was she charged for? It wasn't vague. What were the underlying facts? The deflection here is rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 02:03 PM
1

No, it means the accusation being made has no weight. What you're asking for is for someone to prove a negative. There is one person saying something happened, that it exists. Saying that person must prove it exists is not saying it doesn't exist. By default it means status quo. If that works in the accused favor, then that's what it is. But we don't ask people accused to prove a negative for good reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:56 PM
2

Except that's exactly how it works. That's not how it works. So to you, because the crime and punishment doesn't specifically say "false accusations" it somehow doesn't count as punishment? The law is exact. Unlike here, words mean something. If it wasn't for a false accusation, it wasn't for a false accusation. There are many false accusations that in and of themselves have gone unpunished. She was charged with theft by deception because she created a GoFundMe, raised 40k and spent the money. H…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:52 PM
2

She was charged for an ancillary crime. She was not jailed for making a false accusation. The risk still remains.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:31 PM
2

It presumes neutrality.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:29 PM
0

The response is to wait for the facts, in either direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:25 PM
0

Our legal system does not allow this, unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:12 PM
0

Wouldn't you want an all expense paid meal that you had to plan from beginning to end, which cost you nothing, with the power of rejection at the end if you didn't feel the "vibes"?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 06:22 PM
7

The options they've always had - men that find them attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 01:43 PM
2

It becomes unattractive when their own interests are harmed or implicated by an emotionally mature guy. If they can't get away with the weaponization of emotions, all of the sudden, emotional maturity becomes something new and transformed, like "controlling", "narcissism", "DARVO", or whatever new pop buzz words their Tik Tok compatriots dream up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 12:11 PM
6

Fortune favors the bold
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 09:33 PM
1

Watch what they do, not what they say. It can all be so simple. A lot of this emotional vulnerability/maturity/intelligence crap is Tik Tok induced buzzwords by pop therapist. They repeat it because they saw it somewhere and it sounds good. They don't know what it means. You ask 100 women, you'll get 100 different answers. They will hammer it over your head to explain why they don't want to be with the proverbial average guy but when Chad comes along with the emotional maturity of a gnat, he'll …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 09:27 PM
2

Women's intuition is one of the most bigoted statements out there then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 04:34 PM
–

You can always tell the comments that are always searching for crumbs of coochie.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 12:10 PM
–

The gag is women always think they are in their prime desirability, regardless of age.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 12:08 PM
2

It's because women generally believe they are the main character in everyone's lives and should be treated as such. Their feelings and experiences take primacy over everyone and everything else. To disagree or not validate their feelings is the highest insult because they believe they are always right. Remember, these are the same folks who created weird concepts like "vibes", "energy", "a woman's intuition is always right" and things like that, completely unsupported by facts, but all resting o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 12:02 PM
2

This is a response you give when you've lost the argument and have no where to go. This was your question: Can I have an example of a problem women will complain about but don't want solved? There is no clearer example of arguing in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:57 AM
1

It's because of this strange obsession women generally have with being the main character in everyone's lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:52 AM
2

it will make men think that the real problem are women Not think. They are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:50 AM
1

Read the first post in this thread and you'll see. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:57 PM
-1

Of course. She gave another man the highest honor - risking her life to have his child. So now, she can just have a good time with the next guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 03:34 PM
1

Until she risks her body for him, it's just a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:53 PM
1

Did you read my post or are you dense? You're trying to change the measure that I brought up in my post then accuse me of moving the goalposts. Nice to see you don't have an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:52 PM
-1

How many babies did she have for those men? Did she risk her body for those men? No. You're purposely being dense and missing the point by pointing to one woman, with a very poor argument, when I gave you countless examples of women in their prime going after older men to carry their seed. They are willing to be baby mother # [_] by choice to a valuable man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:51 PM
0

You responded to my post about harems of women having these men's babies and now you accuse me of moving the goalposts by me asking if she has Elon's babies? Make it make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:47 PM
0

Did she have his babies?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:27 PM
1

How many men's babies did she have prior to Musk?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:25 PM
-1

And? He does it because that amount of money is meaningless to him. And Grimes has a new boyfriend now. 😂😂😂 She risked her body to have a baby for a man in a harem and your response is someone got to eat the leftovers?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:24 PM
1

Wonderful. He has Musk's leftovers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 02:22 PM
-1

You're right, men don't have a prime because there is no ceiling. It's ever increasing. So long as men like Elon Musk and Bill Gates and the like continue to gain more financial resources, there will be women waiting in the wings for their chance, even as part of a harem. Look at the women in their prime willing to risk their bodies for Eddie Murphy, Elon Musk, Nick Cannon, Robert DeNiro, Jude Law, Alec Baldwin, Mel Gibson, Diddy and the list goes on, even when some of these women knew they were…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 01:24 PM
4

So men aren't looking stuff up online either because it's not that big a deal to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 05:09 AM
2

Why can't smile be used? It's not like smiling is some unique aspect of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:58 AM
7

Your evidence is the existence of a website?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:56 AM
5

I'm very interested to see the response to this
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 04:46 AM
1

She engaged in revenge porn. She's a predator.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:31 PM
2

There we go! Finally someone said it and read between the lines. I somehow get banned if I point out "race" but yup, you got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:31 PM
3

Someone doesn't understand basic law... I learned this basic shit in high school.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:29 PM
1

You didn’t read it all the way. A 16 yr old was involved in his public masturbation. That’s a child by law. And he didn’t even have to touch her. He motioned her to his car Your reading comprehension skills are terrible. The article says masturbating in front of 1 woman and 3 girls. They detail the four masturbating incidents in the paragraphs that follow. Those are the 4 counts of lewdness. It explicitly says the sexual assault is connected to a child, which is unnamed and not described. The ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:28 PM
2

I hate when you people don't read your own articles. You have time to delete this. Article 1: "The Ocean County Jail, where Ladj was being held on Wednesday night pending a detention hearing and where his first name was spelled “Messinissa,” listed the unspecified sexual assault charge as being connected to a crime against a child." The sexual assault charge is not one of the ones listed. It clearly says "unspecified". The four counts of lewdness are for the four instances of masturbating. The e…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:36 PM
1

What's also plausible is that she is a predator who filmed a helpless man asleep.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:27 PM
1

When she was on his porch, she was in his house. What don't you understand about that? She was on his property. She simply had to place a bag in front of a door (the location specified) and leave. What did she choose to do? Take out her camera. Angle herself so she had a view of the couch. Zoom in. You have no clue what she did because the damn video is from her biased perspective. It's not a ring camera that showed you the before, during and after. She's not a passive bystander taking a video.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:26 PM
2

dEpEnDZ oN ThE lAWw No it doesn't. Sexual assault is defined in the law and so is indecent exposure. Link actual legislation that says so, not the musings of random people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:22 PM
1

No one was there. You're left taking the word of a person whose motive is to go viral on Tik Tok, judged by her actions after the fact, who is a biased and unreliable narrator and whose story has changed repeatedly. Folks are pointing out the inconsistencies, similar to what OP is doing, but his goal is to justify everything she did and call it a grand conspiracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:16 PM
7

Exactly. These arguments are flimsy and fail with the slightest bit of scrutiny.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:00 PM
1

Exactly. Attention is currency for these women. We're supposed to believe she innocently went to drop her food and viola a naked man faked sleep, flashed her, stayed completely still while she was filming him.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:55 PM
3

No. Make your argument. Don't point to random documents. Use your words.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:52 PM
2

You should ask OP that. He is the one justifying her actions by saying they legally are permissible using doctrines of plain sight. You keep bringing up the guy. The guy is the object of the video. We are discussing her actions - the person who filmed a sleeping man and uploaded it to the Internet - being justified because things were in plain sight. Hope you can understand the nuance. There is no justification for recording video and especially posting a naked toddler to the Internet because a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:51 PM
1

She was told to leave food on the porch in front of the door. That's it. Simple instructions. She wasn't told to film inside his home. Leave the food at the door as instructed, and leave. How difficult is that? Now you want to turn it into a crime because she decided to stare at a naked man on his couch. She wasn't forced to, she chose to. She's a predator.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:45 PM
6

Because that's what you've just justified in your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:42 PM
2

This is the legal argument OP is making. That child pornographers should have access to publicly filmed toddlers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:40 PM
3

She's on his property.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:10 PM
5

No, because that's not the argument the OP made. They rest their entire argument on legal concepts of "plain view", "plain sight" and the door being in "public" so long as a naked toddler is in plain view, filming said video for child pornographers to see is justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:09 PM
3

So she could have just walked away after dropping the food off. She needed to have zero interaction with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:02 PM
3

The burden of proof is on you to show intent. You're doing quite poorly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:59 PM
8

So let's understand the blue pill argument. If a contractor was working on your front door or a window, and you were bathing your toddler, and say while drying your toddler, they start running through the house - the blue pill argument here is that they can film the naked toddler, and post it to the Internet for the world, including child pornographers, to see because the toddler did not have an expectation of privacy while the contractor had the door open?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:56 PM
9

Yes. No curtains.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:47 PM
3

If this is the blue pill argument, you blue pillers have really lost the plot.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 08:43 PM
2

I see a trend of women flocking to the party they say is taking away their rights..
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:44 PM
2

As long as you agree your words are comical.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 01:08 AM
2

Women are responsible for Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:27 AM
0

I am not your free source of research labor. There are websites like that. Then don't participate in debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:27 AM
1

Now check votes for the Republican candidate. This doesn't give any information about affirmatively voting for what OP is talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 12:26 AM
1

Yes, it's been an increased share of the women vote over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 11:28 PM
2

Women are. Looking at voting trends over the past 8 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 11:28 PM
-3

Don't participate in debate where you're not prepared to defend your points with sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 10:57 PM
-1

But they've increasingly voted for these policies, so I didn't want to hear this weird narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 10:55 PM
2

Stick to the OP. While women's rights have been supposedly under attack, women moved increasingly to the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 10:14 PM
1

"Biden made gains with men, while Trump improved among women, narrowing the gender gap. The gender gap in the 2020 election was narrower than it had been in 2016, both because of gains that Biden made among men and because of gains Trump made among women. In 2020, men were almost evenly divided between Trump and Biden, unlike in 2016 when Trump won men by 11 points. Trump won a slightly larger share of women’s votes in 2020 than in 2016 (44% vs. 39%), while Biden’s share among women was nearly i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 10:04 PM
0

But more voted for Trump than the prior election which is what matters. I'm sure you know how elections work. The suburban women of a certain hue who swing back and forth are the ultimate ones who decide elections. They swung towards Trump because of the price of eggs, everything else be damned.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 04:54 PM
0

https://cawp.rutgers.edu/facts/voters/gender-differences-voter-turnout Scroll down to voters by gender who reported voting. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 03:15 PM
1

82mm women voted, 73mm men did.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 02:35 PM
2

They won't have a good answer to this. The most rabid anti-abortionist are women. Women are the ones who put Trump in office.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 01:55 PM
18

I too would like the salary of an NBA player while having the audience of a WNBA player. All of the benefits, none of the responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/25 12:22 AM
1

No, it does not. Unless you believe one can't lower maternal death rates by tackling chronic illness (as I quoted as one of the issues), racial bias and other problems in the system. Maternal death rates were increasing even before access to contraception was being restricted.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 01:36 PM
–

A part of society is talking about it. We are close to 50/50 on those who care and don't. More don't care about it than I would expect. What are you basing this conclusion on? The South Carolina law in consideration may even ban some daily oral contraceptive pills. Sure I could be more specific, but there are more examples than just that. This is not indicative of folks caring for maternal health. As opposed as I am to getting rid of contraceptive options for women, up to and including abortion,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 01:30 PM
–

Healthcare laws and deaths. This is vague. Articles from big publications and Jessica Valenti with her newsletter talk about it. So "society" is talking about it, contrary to your initial point. If it doesn't apply to your culture or your group, I think that's great, really. It actually does, thus my education on the topic. You're misguided. I'm just going on things I've seen near me (without fixing myself). All of the US has had an average rate of deaths increase when it already started off gre…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 01:21 PM
–

Literally one state. Women are not the only ones talking about this. I've know about the uptick in maternal mortality rates for a while now. It's been national news for a while. What reasons are abundantly clear? Have you spoken to ob/gyn's to determine whether "nothing is being done about it"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:44 PM
–

You don't make much sense. If "society" doesn't care about maternal deaths, how is it that everyone has the information that maternal deaths have increased and why are folks investigating the reasons why? A society who did not care would turn a blind eye to it and let it fester, but even as you admit, it's been detected "the last years" and not only has the NYT done a large story of it, multiple outlets have followed up. How is that indicative of a society that doesn't care about maternal health…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:34 PM
1

True
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:18 PM
2

Yes, you actually should. You're naive.Which is why psychiatric hospitals have security. If they didn't expect anyone to get assaulted, they wouldn't have security. Making content for all the crazies who pay you massive sums is the equivalent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:17 PM
2

Concert ticket are different
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:27 AM
5

If you decide to go be a stripper at a psychiatric hospital, you can expect some strange things to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:25 AM
–

A lot of society does not give a shit about women's healthcare, and maternal mortality. Checks insurance and what I'm covering with my premiums even though I don't use it as a man What the hell are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:18 AM
1

She never denied that was an option
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:08 AM
2

You don't have to pray for me. I'm good.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:42 AM
4

He started treating you bad while you were pregnant. You decided to keep your ties to him. You could have aborted. Nothing was stopping you. That's on you. The fact that you didn't use the tools available to you is no one's fault but yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:27 AM
4

Most times, the rationale is "I can change him".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 11:58 PM
1

Abortion is available to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 11:57 PM
9

What is the debate? Yes, if you haven't vetted the father of your children, you will be blamed for choosing a shitty person. You bear the risks of pregnancy as you ladies like to say, one would expect the one who bears the risk is the more vigilant one. Women control access to sex. Men control access to relationships. If you choose to be a man's 6th baby mother, that's your fault. If you choose to have a man's kid who you haven't vetted and have not gotten any commitment from and complain about,…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 11:55 PM
1

Women are hedonistic. End of story.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:43 PM
6

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:25 PM
0

Liberating on the revenue side, not the expense side.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:20 PM
6

I'm pro-slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 07:57 PM
6

I agree with you - women don't care about mental health. This is where I disagree. Women only care about it insofar as it can be weaponized in their favor. The Therapy Industrial Complex ("TIC") is a capitalist product of commoditizing mental health (in the domain where women stand to gain greater economic benefit) for profit and gain. Hence why you hear terms like he was a narcissist, therapy as maintenance, speaking my truth, I'm neurodivergent as a sexy label to be treated special, among many…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 07:19 PM
1

I don't know. Maybe they do. Someone should study that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 01:05 AM
1

You should read what you posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 12:15 PM
2

Sounds like the distribution of any high risk, high reward career.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:41 PM
1

The same ones it seems where you are calling prostitutes and escorts poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:17 PM
1

It's far off from 56% based on what you posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:15 PM
1

Please, delete this response as soon as you can. Lol. You think this was a smart reply, it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:13 PM
1

The question is if OSHA isn't appearing. Which is what is happening under this administration. They've gutted the regulations.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:11 PM
1

I think the stats are like 70% of sex workers get raped and 90% of them physically assaulted. Where did you get your 90% number from?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:08 PM
1

And if they don't...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:06 PM
-4

What makes you think they are in seedy buildings? You know what a seedy building is implying right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:06 PM
1

You brought it up. And were wrong. Just giving you a chance to correct yourself, otherwise, this thread of inquiry can end right here.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:03 PM
1

And if they don't. They literally have little to no legal or regulatory protection, which is what you started out with. You think their employers still expect them to work? The rise in black lung says yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:02 PM
-3

I hear, like every profession, there are those who make a lot and those who make a little. There are high class escorts (a la Eliot Spitzer, former governor of NY) and lower cost prostitutes who sell their wares in the streets. There's variety across the budget spectrum. Very interesting how you view them with such disdain and believe they are all crack whores living on their last dollar.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 08:01 PM
3

As moral as the folks getting lattes from Starbucks knowing that one of the baristas only works there to support their heroin addiction and whose bf abuses her at home unless she goes to work everyday to bring him money. As moral as they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:57 PM
1

Washing cups vs being sexual assaulted. That's specific. Clearly, sexual assault is worse. How about if the second relative, rather than having them wash cups, paid them to torture and murder a bunch of people in his basement? Which one do you think is worse?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:56 PM
1

So, nothing. Moving on...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:54 PM
1

This is ridiculous. I can't walk into a grocery store and offer financial advisor services in exchange for my groceries either. A lot of these comments are grasping at straws and no one can actually coherently write a philosophical defense outside of "yuck".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:50 PM
0

If you were deep in a hardcore drug addiction and knew the only way to get your next fix was to suck a random man's dick, is that really a choice? Yes. Can't get a minimum wage job because of possible criminal record and the fact that she'd need to shoot up at work. It's the best of a very bad bunch of options. Yes, a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:39 PM
1

So dating is coercion as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:37 PM
-4

because there is no alternative way of making as much money FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:36 PM
1

I'm the person who explained to you what women have had to be trafficked and forced to do throughout history. When you have something to say about that, I'm all ears. I don't give a flying fuck what you explained. Who are you to say why women want to have sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:33 PM
1

So just to be clear, you don’t think that sexually abusing a child is any different (or has different consequences) from child labor? I was quite clear in my response. What is it you don't understand? It's there in writing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:31 PM
1

What's the stat for porn stars? Do you know? You certainly were quick to trot out a misleading statistic, now you're upset you were called out on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:30 PM
1

They didn't propose cuts, they actually cut. That led to a rise in black lung disease. I'm not going to do your homework for you on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:29 PM
1

McDonald's hardly ever has disease spread. They have stayed in business. Sex spreads worse disease even consensually. More than 1/10th of the population! Not the same as McDonald's at all. That's not what you said. You never said "hardly". Just because they stay in business doesn't mean they haven't had any diseases spread. Last year, 75 people were sick from an E coli outbreak spread by quarter pounders across 13 states. What the fuck are you even talking about? People can't massage themselves …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:27 PM
1

I'm not dodging the question. We, as a society, do not believe children are mature enough to engage in any type of labor, so we have limits around that. Of course, in that same vein, sex abuse (I assume you mean, an adult with a child, sexually) is wrong because for the same reasons, children aren't developed mentally enough to enter such agreements with adults. I'm not going to put a moral scale on whether child labor is worse from a mental health perspective, because a child working in a Level…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:19 PM
1

We have child labor laws. No children should be working in a coffee shop. So yes, I would say a child doing either of those things is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:12 PM
1

Do those jobs pose the same risks as sex work? Who cares? You're not making a risk based argument. This is deflection. You want me to bring up a dangerous job instead? Do you genuinely believe that sex is not more intimate compared to standard jobs? So are massage therapists, gym trainers, and doctors. Does the job of a barista release hormones that bond you to your customer? Why does this even matter? But alright - Nurses who work in hospitals taking care of babies have hormones released that b…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:08 PM
1

https://share.google/vLBjsjsbGumcIywm8
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:02 PM
0

The difference is one spreads public disease. This can happen at McDonald's. The difference is, for McDonald's, consumers are able to eat. For sex work, no one benefits except for through sadism. No one benefits? One person gets money. The other person received a service. Do you argue the same about the massage industry? No one benefits there? The difference is how two people who are working at McDonald's equally don't require one to pay the other. Yes, you do. In fact, McDonald's, similar to a …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:00 PM
0

What is all the time. We were talking about porn stars. You then create a larger group that includes more than porn stars and say look at these stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:53 PM
1

Because you're ok purchasing a service or product from (like a latte from a barista), and I quote "someone who's not into it". And if someone has to choose between having money to live or [making you a latte], that is coercion [and thus forced labor].
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:52 PM
0

Let me add to this. Mine workers are dying from black lung. What are you even talking about? I don't see anyone up in arms about the forced labor of mine workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:49 PM
2

Exactly. Labor that one does not want to do is effectively slavery by their definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:47 PM
0

Sex worker =/= porn star.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:43 PM
1

You seem to be ok with forced slavery, but sexual assault is where you draw the line. If someone is selling sex in exchange for money, that is not coercion. That is an offer of sex in exchange for money.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:42 PM
1

Again, not a single source of legislation. So all trafficking victims are victims of rape, but not all prostitutes are raped by virtue of them being prostitutes. Just like you don't know if the service provider you use is a slave, because you can't guarantee they aren't being sold into slavery right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:41 PM
1

Legal. Definition. Please.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:36 PM
1

So I would hope the ridiculous definition that I'm responding to would cause you equal agita.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:34 PM
5

I'm confused as to why the nature of the work matters. Porn stars have sex all the time on film. Is that rape to you? They are getting fucked and nutted on all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:33 PM
1

Please, send me a legal definition. Not your emotionally driven drivel.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:30 PM
1

Nor do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:21 PM
1

Rape has a legal definition. You do not know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:20 PM
2

If someone sets a menu out, with a price for a service, and are willing to provide the service, that is not rape. There's a reason why you haven't quoted any legal definition of rape, because yours is, excuse my French, bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:18 PM
2

You're ok raping someone for their labor. You're just ok with it since it benefits you. Nice to know as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:16 PM
3

100 years ago, your response to my question as to why interracial marriage is wrong would have been "it's a crime". That's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:14 PM
1

The same way you don't know whether someone who is serving you or providing a service is being paid a legal wage and is doing it for the money. But you have no outrage doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:13 PM
4

So was interracial marriage at one point. That's not the conversation and is irrelevant. You are simply appealing to authority at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:10 PM
3

You can also be coerced into working at McDonald's because you need the money to survive. What's the difference
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:07 PM
-1

And? Others put money on a pedestal.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:06 PM
0

So as long as she's thriving, is fine to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:05 PM
3

You literally created a definition of rape that says it's an unwanted use of your body.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 06:03 PM
0

What if she's having sex to thrive, a la Onlyfans?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 05:51 PM
3

First, you're very wrong. But let's assume you made sense. By that same thinking, are you calling the labor markets one big rape fest?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 05:49 PM
-3

Folks sell their bodies for labor everyday. Some well their bodies for scientific study. I too am confused why this differs.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 05:46 PM
1

Yup, they should. Everyone should choose better.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 05:49 PM
1

Still hit though
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 11:00 PM
1

"You know Steve's wife as been around. You know that guy with a huge dick that's fucking all those women? Yeah she was a side piece in his haram for months right before meeting Steve... That's the type of women he's settling for haha, Steve's big dick's leftovers." 😂😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 10:33 PM
3

😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 05:29 PM
5

So you agree men can get ruined without regard to socioeconomic status?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 05:23 PM
4

You just repeated what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:41 PM
1

Statistically, no more than the number of women who cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:25 PM
2

Preach
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:24 PM
6

Until said woman changes her socioeconomic status while in the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:23 PM
7

This. Men's mental load is dismissed or non-existent because they are taken as being a real man. Any complaints and they (women) question your sexuality in response.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:20 PM
1

Triggered by those words?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 04:15 PM
-1

Sure, but that's not what the studies and women's resulting talking points actually say.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 02:06 PM
3

The only difference between a situationship and a FWB is delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:46 PM
1

Statistically, I'll take that bet every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:34 PM
1

Distinction without a difference
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:33 PM
–

Like dude, you deny it, and then later in the same paragraph you do the same again, mocking any woman who went to college claiming she’s automatically a bitch screeching “qWeEenz”. You clearly have issues about women making money and going to school. And this is the problem. The sisterhood won't even concede that women with bad attitudes exist who make their education and career everything and walk around with the "I'm better than you" attitude. Pointing out a flaw in a large number of women who…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 11:42 AM
0

I think it's very interesting you switched your argument from claiming there's nothing about social class that makes any difference in a woman to specifying a "master in gender studies", a title routinely used to mock women with careers as being useless. It really shouldn't be interesting, because I used an example of one of my original three. This would fit in the education bucket. I get it, you think women shouldn't have jobs. Triggered much? Specify where I wrote that. When you make your educ…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:46 PM
1

You may feel there’s nothing inherent there, but statistically, higher educational outcomes for women are strongly correlated with lower divorce rates. The answer you're looking for is financial stability which you mention in your next paragraph. So long as household income is above a certain level, the divorce rate drops. But also remember, women will only typically date those who make the same or more than they do. You are not making the point you think you're making. No where in my statement …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 04:58 PM
4

It's because your reasoning is terrible and obfuscating the actual point. Women's careers and achievements do not matter because there is nothing inherent in a career, education or achievement that leads to a good relationship. No one has ever argued that being a good lawyer makes you a good wife or mother. Even further, as a general rule, women want men who make as much or more than they do as a barometer of fit. The amount of money one makes is generally arbitrary and has zero correlation to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:38 PM
1

Have you lost it? Look at the thread you're responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 10:23 PM
3

The golden rule right there
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:17 PM
1

Sounds like it but it isn't. That's the fucking point.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:15 PM
2

So... they don't want marriage. What exactly do you think marriage is? It's an official record with the state.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:14 PM
1

I searched for "marriage" and found 2 posts remotely to people being desperate. Just say you don't know and you were making stuff up. It's ok to be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:11 PM
1

Point to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:31 PM
–

Deflecting the question I see. This was about marriage, but I know, deflection is a sport for folks like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:28 PM
–

I mean, point me to a place, online or in the real world, where you find a group of men complaining about not being married. If not....
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:24 PM
–

You're watching too much 90 day fiance.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:18 PM
–

Go read r/Waiting_To_Wed and go see the huge number of desperate guys just screaming out to get married /s 😂😂😂 This comment is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:22 PM
2

Because men actually care about love. Women care about what can be done for them. They are transactional as fuck with little reciprocation, generally speaking. They expect to be taken care of as the base case. Not all, that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:28 PM
3

Glad to hear a woman finally say it. It was women who were staunchly anti abortion, so we can stop this whole, it's men trying to control women's bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 12:22 PM
5

No one cares about your standards. Go seek the billionaire 6'7 guy you've been pining for. The problem is that the men you want don't want you. Your experience tells you that you don't qualify - those men don't find you attractive. Essentially, you don't meet your own standards. Then, rather than work on yourself, you complain and blame the collective "men" saying they don't meet your standards, "where are all the good men" and other stupid comments like that. No - you just don't qualify for you…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 11:25 PM
5

No
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 03:49 PM
9

Not really. Also, read the fucking prompt.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 03:43 PM
28

If she doesn't like sex, she's not attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 02:12 PM
2

I'd rather touch grass in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:30 PM
1

You already say it. It's a running joke in society about "better halves" and "you're lucky you found her". So no, lol, it wouldn't hurt anyone's ego more than what is already implied. Those comments are generally meant to spare women's feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:11 PM
5

Women are far more likely to post on social media like a daily diary, so I just don't believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:09 PM
4

Somehow i don't see that. I see daily posts about too high standards of women etc From other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 02:05 PM
1

You're acting like it's a singularly male phenomenon. You center women as perfect beings who men want to settle. No, you all want people who you think have (often better) qualities than you to choose you because it reinforces your belief of what you "deserve" and inflates your ego. You just don't want to call it settling when it comes to women. The point is everyone wants to be settled for by someone better than them. You (women) can't say you were settled for because it hurts your feelings and …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 01:57 PM
2

And those same women want the Chads to settle for them, so what's the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 01:48 PM
1

But men are not able. Can you call someone a heroin addict just because they've said, "I really wish I could try heroin one day"?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:34 PM
2

Sorry to disappoint you, but sexually undisciplined men are hoes as well. There are two dimensions to hoe-ness - willingness and ability. A hoe who can't hoe isn't a hoe. You may want to fuck, but if no one wants to fuck you, too bad. Thus, I disagree that "men are hoes if not more so than women". Men often lack the ability/opportunity, not the willingness.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:21 PM
–

Being a hoe is an addiction. Lack of sexual discipline is similar to drug addicts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:36 PM
–

Addictions aren't normal by any stretch of the imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:28 PM
1

Because men lie to make women happy. You can't in one breath argue men withhold their feelings and are not "emotionally intelligent" while then taking what they say in surveys at face value. Either they are in touch with their emotions and express it or they lie to make women happy and don't say what they really feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 03:34 PM
0

Living longer is not indicative of quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:56 PM
1

Here's the secret: it isn't better for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:32 PM
1

I mean, of course they are. Otherwise, where would they be finding the women to beat in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 11:40 AM
1

You concede that it's good for rhythm and pace. That's how it translates. I never argued against not needing your legs. No one is arguing that someone who can twerk but is 700 pounds is necessarily good in bed. Of course there are other things, but to dismiss it out of hand as you did is what was being pushed back on. And again, men are here telling you that it has a benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 05:10 PM
1

No one said it was the only thing. You were arguing it doesn't "translate".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 04:11 PM
1

Lol, you right...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 03:38 PM
2

Very little dancing skill crosses over to riding men. Perhaps she’d have better pacing and stamina. But twerking doesn’t translate. Completely different muscles are used. I don't know if you are being current about what your actual position is? Does it help or does it not? Saying now that it "effects sexual performance" but then saying "twerking doesn't translate", and pulling up screenshots of ChatGPT to support that position sounds like you're trying to say two opposing things. So twerking hel…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 03:34 PM
2

I completely agree with you. Having control of your muscle groups will always be a net benefit to an activity that requires control and endurance. Someone arguing against that basic common sense breeds suspicion of their bona fides.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 03:22 PM
4

Yea, I'm starting not to believe that she's a dancer
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 03:05 PM
-2

What kind of dance do you do?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:28 PM
4

Found the person who can't twerk
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 07:31 PM
1

The bar is in hell for women's skills
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 07:30 PM
1

Exactly, there is emotion involved in standard run of the mill prostitution. I'm not sure what you mean by love? Love is not involved in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 02:54 PM
1

This is not necessarily true. You are saying if there is no exchange of emotions (as women say, they can have meaningless sex) then it's classified as prostitution right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 02:07 PM
1

So ChatGPT told you she was posing for the male gaze? ETA - see the thing with AI is shitty prompt, shitty answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:34 PM
1

Well, the one you said in your post was posting for the male gaze...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 10:02 PM
1

Can you prove she's "posing for male gaze"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:13 PM
1

Wrong. This dating app is serving as a menu for women to experience the toxic men they claim they dislike. This is simply increasing the popularity of so called "bad" men because women will 1. think they can change him or 2. they actually enjoy the toxicity if he has a big enough dick, has a large enough bank account, is tall enough or has the looks. Normal men were never part of the conversation. Women want men who other women want. Watch what they do, not what they say. This app will quickly d…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 08:46 PM
1

Then I can tell you, alimony, by your definition is not "rare".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 03:12 PM
1

Alimony is rare because they've successfully rebranded it as "maintenance".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 02:34 PM
1

And how is one supposed to know a therapist is using "evidence based practices" as a lay person?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 04:49 PM
1

Sort of like "be yourself bro", "get a better personality" that's touted around here by the blues?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:04 PM
1

Psychology and therapy are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:03 PM
0

Psychology and therapy are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:00 PM
2

No. This is wrong. Doctors have tests to verify things.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:55 PM
0

Apologies - put under the wrong post. But a grift indeed. Women rebelled over their medical doctors calling them fat, they certainly are going to rebel over any therapy that isn't a feel good personal human vibrator they can go to once a week. The problem with therapy as practiced generally is a bunch of "therapists" are not really therapists at all - they're professional cheerleaders with worthless training/degrees who believe they can address all issues - even those they were never trained to …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:44 PM
-3

100% agree. Women rebelled over their medical doctors calling them fat, they certainly are going to rebel over any therapy that isn't a feel good personal human vibrator they can go to once a week. The problem with therapy as practiced generally is a bunch of "therapists" are not really therapists at all - they're professional cheerleaders with worthless training/degrees who believe they can address all issues - even those they were never trained to address. The part I most enjoy hearing and lau…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 02:37 PM
1

Stop it. The investigation into Adams started way before there was a migrant crisis in NYC. You clearly never read the evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 12:56 PM
1

Who are the top 100 OF earners? Name them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 10:45 AM
8

What's the point of this when he just got married again, to a woman that's like a 4 in the face.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 10:42 AM
1

"These statistics suggest that both groups of so-called “extreme dads” are more likely than average dads with young children to have had kids with multiple women, not to be married when they have them and to rely on their own parents for support." https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/11/the-two-extremes-of-fatherhood.html#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20they're%20both%20more%20likely%20to,to%20be%20living%20with%20their%20own%20parents.&text=These%20statistics%20suggest%20that%20both%20groups%…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:36 PM
–

Then why are so many deadbeat fathers repeat offenders with multiple women?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:47 PM
–

They look at the man who had three kids who he doesn't see or pay for, then choose to have his child because they have an inflated sense of self, they are different. Then they say he's a deadbeat and could he do this to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:30 PM
–

Yes it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:28 PM
1

What? So why did early legislatures not want the unwashed masses voting, so they chose representation directly to Congress?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 11:28 AM
1

So include women in the draft. Problem solved. It breaks the logic chain.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 11:26 AM
4

But yet in all these spaces, it's only discussed with respect to women. It is blind to men. I dare you find a widely accepted piece that quotes emotional labor with respect to men or recognizes the "emotional labor" they must do in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:00 PM
4

By who exactly? By people who threw the kitchen sink into a term that tries to define every grievance. There's not even a questioning of whether the concept of "emotional labor" exists in a relationship. Logically, it doesn't. It's allowed mostly women to devalue any labor that their partners go through (for example, the "emotional labor" of financially providing for a family that men go through and keeping up with unreasonable spending habits of their partners) to prioritize their own grievance…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:16 PM
4

That's because they tried to ram a term that had absolutely nothing to do with relationships into their relationships and home lives. Even the sociologists who created the term has criticized the extension of its use in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 03:02 PM
-2

It's also wrongly applied. At least use the actual definition. It's about suppressing or ignoring one's own emotion, not about managing others emotions. So if you are suppressing and not expressing how you truly feel at home just so things go nicely, that's the labor, the active suppression. But the workplace is more pernicious because one's income is tied to doing so. At home, the stakes are different, which is why it's a ridiculous term. If you want to say you don't want to manage other's emot…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:59 PM
6

Emotional labor was about additional labor required in the workplace, especially hospitality and service industries. It was never meant to cover the home. And even if you want to ridiculously extend to the home, which has serious problems, it's about suppressing or faking emotion, it's not about taking care of the emotions of others. It's not about actual external labor. That's just a perverse definition to extend victimhood where none exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:52 PM
4

They'd blame it on the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:53 PM
-1

Yes, life is not fair. Women get magnitudes of more attention when they are younger vs when they are older. Men have to work on their value to be "worthy". Men are called broke while pretty women who situated similarly financially are referred to as the "prize". Women die older, men die younger. Eggs stop ovulating while sperm get generated for longer. So yes, all of the advantages you get when you're younger expire. All of the disadvantages as a man disappear as you get older, you just don't ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 01:59 PM
1

She's recreational use only. Not sure why you're taking this person seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 12:39 PM
1

Don't worry about why. Just pump and dump. Is recreational use only.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/25 12:37 PM
1

I'm cleaner, clean better and more organized than all the women I've dated. It's a myth that women are cleaner/neater.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 06:54 PM
–

Objectification is only fine when they benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 10:24 PM
1

That would be just fine. 30 days in jail, community service, etc. People here are acting like it's the end of their life if the get a sentence. Anything to excuse this abhorrent behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 04:34 AM
4

It really is disgusting using a child as a shield for fraudulent behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 12:37 AM
3

Cheating isn't a crime. Fraud is. For purposes of calculating damages, that is a reasonable proxy. No court can force you to go to work and share your paycheck with your wife. On the other hand, a court can compel child support regardless of whether you work or not. That's the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 09:41 PM
3

Again, disagree. One can reasonably assume that had the fraud not been committed, the father would have divorced, had he known the truth at the time, if he decides to divorce at the time. We can then infer the same fraud as he would not have been responsible. Any calculation of child support would then be backdated to the first instance in the fraud (conception) as what it would have been in that instance and restitution made.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 09:04 PM
5

They need to figure it out. Simple way to avoid this is to not engage in the fraud to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 07:35 PM
5

Damn right. Fucking kid living on easy street through the proceeds of a fraud. If she was the mastermind of a Ponzi scheme and used all the money to give her kid a great life, no one here would blink an eye snatching the ill gotten gains from their grubby little hands. Run me my fucking coins.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 06:16 PM
10

It's in the best interest of justice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 06:09 PM
6

The jail sentence will end. Just because you go to jail doesn't mean you earn zero forever. What kind of logic is this? Yes, it's a good outcome. He will receive restitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 06:06 PM
3

Good thing the courts don't have to compensate feelings, they just need to restore the fraudulently acquired payments from the fraud the mother perpetrated on the victim, the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 06:01 PM
7

Fuck them kids. She committed fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:57 PM
2

what do you think should be done to make men whole in cases where a woman has little to no assets and the state incarcerates her and she will not be capable of even beginning repayment for several years? the man is just fucked? She will begin her restitution when she gets out of jail. There are lots of programs that deal with this already. It's not new.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:54 PM
8

Deterrence.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:51 PM
3

She's literally accusing a person who doesn't know she has a child of conspiracy, when the mastermind of the fraud has actual knowledge that she had sex with all of these men. She's ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:50 PM
3

How is it not intentional deception when you've let another man ejaculate in you unprotected, don't have clear guidance on who the father is, then say for a fact it is a person who is in fact not the father? Are they unaware that they had unprotected sex with another man?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:44 PM
8

The biological dad did not force the wrongly accused to pay. How hard is it for a woman to say "I fucked another man/other men and this child may not be yours"? Problem solved. You're implying that the biological father has actual knowledge that the woman has his child. Everyone is running around here saying men should operate on "trust me bro, I'm your wife/gf/etc" and now she wrongly accuses a man and drains his resources and your saying the bio dad, who may not even know he has a child, shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 04:27 PM
9

You don't get the idea of chained lawsuits. She needs to get the recovery from the father. The wrongly accused has a cause of action against the person who caused him harm. The biological father never claimed the wrongly accused was the father. It was the mother of the child. If she wants to recover funds she received to take care of her child, she can recover from the biological father, assuming she knows who he is. That's her burden, not the wrongly accused. If you sold me something based on a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 04:12 PM
2

Example?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:13 PM
3

I see nothing wrong with that. Want to fly on a plane, you need to show ID. Want to father (or you want this man to father a child) a child, show he is in fact the father. You don't complain about the cost of the ID you need to purchase from the government.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:13 PM
12

And she can sue for that. Her crime, which she benefits from (especially more if the wrongly accused has a higher income) is falsely and fraudulently assigning paternity to the wrong person which she should not have done.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:11 PM
3

You just said you refuted my claim by selecting one person who wasn't jailed, but ignore all the others that were. What was your point in doing so?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:09 PM
3

Because there are no real consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:21 PM
2

I'm not sure how an ordinary test at a hospital is being viewed as punishing all men. My insurance payments pay for procedures I don't need, like a pap smear. I've never described that as being punished for indirectly paying for that service.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:21 PM
3

Sure. Is this the norm in fraud cases? Bernie Madoff went to prison. Are you arguing an injustice there?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:15 PM
4

How exactly are all women being punished for the actions of a few in the case of paternity?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:15 PM
2

Which is the case in a lot of crimes that are committed. You think a single mother who murders someone, assaults someone or engages in embezzlement shouldn't face any consequences because "there's a child in that that needs to go somewhere"?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:14 PM
4

Then why are you deflecting by bringing up an example of someone who got away with fraud?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:12 PM
3

I'm more interested in justice, not some nebulous "peace".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:11 PM
17

Dollars are fungible. She indirectly benefits from the fraud by reducing her financial obligations and fraudulently imposing them on another person. The fraud originated from her intentional misrepresentation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:07 PM
2

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:05 PM
8

The majority of men aren't rapist either so I guess by your logic, we shouldn't strengthen any laws pertaining to that either.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:03 PM
5

Why is that anyone's problem except the criminal who engaged in fraud? "Oh no! It's so burdensome! It's tough to get a job" so don't engage in fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 01:59 PM
3

Because the child is innocent and didn’t scam you. They loved you because they grew up thinking of you as their father. You spent years raising this kid with your own values and tucking them in and holding them while they fell asleep. I don't know whose heart strings you think you're pulling by saying "but what about the children?!". The child isn't going to jail. The fraudster is. Children don't choose to have murderers, rapists, fraudsters, etc as parents. But the parent still goes to jail if …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 01:57 PM
2

This is not a serious response. Arguing no one should go to jail for murder because here's one person who got away with it is not a winning argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 01:47 PM
5

Not paternity fraud. Are you keeping up with this conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:59 PM
2

i do think jail is way overused for civil, non-violent matters. i think sending a woman to jail, a child going into the system, and the man getting no money because she’s making $1/day in jail sounds like possibly the worst outcome for society in these cases. getting absolutely nothing is not the outcome i wish for men in this situation. Completely disagree here. Jail is part of the sentence. Restitution is the other. No reason why this would be treated differently than any other crime of fraud.…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:59 PM
5

What's your point with this statement? Of course you do. But you can face jail time if you don't pay child support. How far is this to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:36 PM
2

paternity fraud is different than regular fraud. there is an innocent child at play, and a father who may or may not wish to continue a parental relationship. i think restitution to the victims here is more important than punishment to the perpetrator. So parents who commit tax fraud shouldn't go to jail if there are innocent children in the house? Explain this logic and cite a case where the existence of innocent children ended a prosecution or impacted a verdict. If a man (not father since he'…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:35 PM
7

Again, this post is addressing criminal action. That doesn't exist although it does for other fraud. It exists for failure to pay child support as well (contempt of court).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:16 PM
8

But there are consequences, up to and including jail time. Loss of driving privileges, loss of passport, wage garnishment, the list goes on. There is no punishment for paternity fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:10 PM
5

They can serve their jail time and pay restitution. This is common. It's a little ridiculous to say you shouldn't serve your punishment because it will be a taxpayer burden. No other case of fraud works like that. Sounds like you want a special carveout for women. Did you think the same for Bernie Madoff's fraud? the man cannot be made monetarily whole by someone who earns nothing. Yes, he can. Again, this is done all the time in fraud cases. Asset forfeiture, wage garnishment, etc. After they'v…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 12:09 PM
4

I'm not sure where you've read that cheating is a crime. No one is suggesting that. Fraudulently ascribing paternity to the wrong person should be a crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:52 AM
4

If you committed any type of fraud, you'd go to jail. Your child would suffer then as well. Are you suggesting that if a parent were to commit a fraud (say embezzlement, tax evasion or a Ponzi scheme) that they shouldn't go to jail because they have children? That's very strange that you think parents now should have a defense against committing fraud that their children would suffer. But judging from OP, I guess some men really don’t care about kids much They are being scammed. Why would they c…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:50 AM
8

They do. There's jail time associated with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:44 AM
3

Completely disagree with this. There are lots of crimes that come with penalties where money cannot make the person whole (wrongful death as an example), yet we still have remedies. It didn't mean men are robotic; it means that that is the only remedy available at law. So yes, there should be restitution, pain and suffering and jail time for fraudulent behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:43 AM
–

They're shooed away as the "nice guy".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 05:19 PM
–

Emotional intelligence doesn't factor for the UbërChad. It's a buzz word to explain away the unattractive/average ones. If you don't serve as an emotional tampon to her, you're emotionally unintelligent. As Chad or Chad adjacent, you can do all the fuck boy stuff. They get a pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 09:45 PM
8

Advancements in science, the increase in life expectancy and general increase in standard of living is also due to the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 07:36 PM
0

You wouldn't be able to tell 5'11" and 6'0" apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 11:49 PM
1

https://legalaidnyc.org/get-help/family-domestic-violence-divorce/what-you-need-to-know-about-spousal-support-in-new-york-family-court/ How is spousal support/maintenance determined? In New York, spousal support/ maintenance is determined by a guideline calculator based upon the income of the two parties and the length of their marriage. The Court is allowed to deviate from the guideline amount based on a number of potential rebuttal factors, however, such deviations are rare. The calculation th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 12:51 PM
1

I'm not arguing with a faux reddit lawyer who can't even read. Link the statute you think means only income disparity matters If you want to go back through the thread to realize you're asking a stupid question right now, be my guest.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 10:40 AM
1

I read the statute. Continue practicing in your state. I'll trust the lawyers who I discussed the issues with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:29 AM
6

If this is the video you wanted to use to make a point, you failed miserably. You're literally advocating for childlike behavior. You're an adult responsible for how you act, point blank.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:27 AM
1

Same thing. Custody is in relation to the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:04 AM
1

Having gone through this process, with lawyers, in a situation with no children, I can assure you, it's not "more of a child support factor" given the transfer of money outside of the topic of asset separation. This wasn't a SAHP situation either. So yea, actual experience shows what you've wrote here isn't the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 02:44 AM
1

So, are you seriously saying "standard of the marriage" is not measured via combining the income together as a starting point? I have experience in this area.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 02:35 AM
1

Child support is a different matter. That money belongs to the children, so that is your responsibility in relation to the children.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 02:29 AM
1

No one is saying there are no other considerations. Not sure why you're stuck on this point. But maintaining the marital standard of living is a major factor. And discretion from the judge makes it quite subjective at the end of the day. My personal belief is you return to the position you were pre marriage, adjusted for the children.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 02:27 AM
2

Which legislation? You understand divorce laws differ state by state right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 01:38 AM
6

This is almost delusional. There have been very public cases of criminals being rewarded for their looks. An example - Jeremy Meeks, a gang member convicted of federal grand theft auto and firearms charges. Women swooned over his mugshot. When he was released, he not only was awarded with a modeling career, but immediately was in a relationship with the owner of TopShop's daughter and had a baby with her (by the way, while he was still married to his wife). You really have to find a corollary to…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 05:44 PM
4

I'd have to agree with maintaining the "lifestyle which one is accustomed to" is a terrible standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 01:39 PM
4

It's the only quantifiable thing, unless you have some ideas how to qualify and validate the other things. Would love to hear them if you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 01:37 PM
1

Yikes. So your argument is "I know about it so it's not fringe". You got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 05:59 PM
1

You believe that the majority of conservatives believe JFK faked his death and will return and Trump will step down for him to become president? 😂 Ok. Believe what you will. Knowing about fringe theories doesn't make it mainstream. It just means you're informed about it. Just like me knowing Austrian economic theory doesn't make it mainstream economic theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 05:54 PM
1

So you're sticking to your "main source of information" claim despite the data? Those same ideas that you're talking about have been on the internet for decades. Yet here you are believing it's mainstream. You've had churches preaching this stuff in real life. But here you think, it's no longer fringe because it's on the Internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 05:35 PM
1

Yes, your coworkers are not the norm by a long shot. I'm showing you what the data says. Your basing it on a feeling. It doesn't reflect reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 05:17 PM
1

🤦🏿‍♂️... That's what happens when you read things way too quickly, because of course you couldn't have read the findings of each of these papers in the time it was sent and your responded. They are getting their news from mainstream outlets who have digital footprints. You've ignore the low trust people have in social media news. Simply seeing something online and believing/ascribing to it are two very different things. Again, talk to people in real life and ask them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 04:48 PM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/social-media-and-news-fact-sheet/ https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/news-platform-fact-sheet/?tabItem=4ef8dece-845a-4b25-8637-ceb3114503c5 https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2024/06/12/how-americans-get-news-on-tiktok-x-facebook-and-instagram/ https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/02/07/many-americans-find-value-in-getting-news-on-social-media-but-concerns-about-inaccuracy-have-risen/ https://www.pewresearch.org/journal…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 04:30 PM
1

They aren't. They may be yours, but it's not people's "main source of information". Maybe, as they say here, touch grass a little and you'll find out the source of people's information. Pew has a study you may want to browse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 04:20 PM
1

Sorry to inform you, what you listed isn't mainstream media. You should learn the definition of what "mainstream media" is. And YouTube will be quick to take down a channel that spouts ridiculousness of the type put in the OP. Again, just because you spend time on it, doesn't make it mainstream.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 04:11 PM
1

You're the one who thinks there is no fringe anymore. You tell me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 04:07 PM
1

I do. You think everyone is reading everything on the dark web. Sorry if it keeps you up at night.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 04:05 PM
1

Which is you, who seems to be putting more energy into things than it deserves. Since you believe "nothing is fringe" because "the Internet". Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 04:02 PM
1

Yes, I'm talking to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 04:00 PM
1

What you talking about? Women won't be in relationships with men who hold these ideas. What's the logical conclusion of that? That 1. people who are in relationships don't care to believe this by definition and 2. people who are the products of people in these relationships won't propagate these ideas or 3. T the people carrying out those ideas won't be successful getting into relationships so failure of the idea. No one said the idea won't exist. The idea is for those ideas to not have oxygen. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 03:47 PM
1

You think people who hold an idea about women being property, who can't have offspring because women didn't want to be with them means their ideas will love on. I mean, unless you're saying there exist women who want to be the property of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 03:32 PM
–

Taken to its logical conclusion, those men will die off. As I said, anyone can say anything. It's for attention. People already have the tools to extricate such thinking from their own lives, so why give it attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 03:05 PM
–

So that thinking doesn't last long does it? Even if it's aspirational, it runs into the reality of divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 03:00 PM
–

How many people in your life are property of their husbands?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 02:46 PM
10

Divorce can only exist because marriage exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 10:27 PM
–

It's extreme for liberals not to conservatives. Please adjust what you're trying to say here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 04:05 PM
1

No, it isn't. People move all the time. You can get an abortion in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 02:23 AM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 02:21 AM
2

Yup. So, not a refugee.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 12:43 AM
2

Not the definition of a refugee.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 12:00 AM
3

Move to NY, CA or IL.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 11:48 PM
6

Lol. Good luck. You'll see women trot out these same statistics to show men are not worthy of them but then turn around and claim they continue to be oppressed by the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 11:47 PM
11

My opinion is by giving these comments/viewpoints the light of day and oxygen, you elevate them and give them more worth than they deserve. These comments thrive on shock value and in a world where attention is currency, in order to get said attention (by people like you), it gets increasingly extreme in order to capture your eyeballs. This rhetoric only thrives on attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 08:41 PM
3

They oppose the idea of a draft. When it actually happens, most stay quiet.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:49 PM
1

Wonderful argument you made there.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:36 PM
1

The greatest resource transfer between men and women has happened under the guise of divorce. It is one of the most predatory legal constructs that exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:22 PM
3

Great. Would love to see it eliminated entirely. The issue is, people use it when it benefits their argument or their bias in a particular topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:12 PM
1

Just like divorce, one of the most predatory things that exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:55 PM
3

Wonderful, so we can retire the women mature faster myth?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:53 PM
1

You compared it to men getting erect. I literally copied and pasted what you wrote. I told you specifically that it is an incorrect comparison and the rationale. You come back and make a "it's connected" argument. No it isn't. The issue I had was you claiming “women idealize a sexual scenario” as though they’re delusional. Wrong person. I didn't make such a claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:54 PM
–

It is disconnected. You sleep with an attractive person because they're attractive. Whether they give you an orgasm or not is a gamble. As you said, you hope. But you act like women being horny for guys who don't give them orgasms is some new discovery. You don't "hope" you get erect for someone. That's the difference. You do or you don't. A woman doesn't hope they're horny for a guy. They either are or they aren't. They are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:47 PM
–

It is disconnected. You sleep with an attractive person because they're attractive. Whether they give you an orgasm or not is a gamble. As you said, you hope. But you act like women being horny for guys who don't give them orgasms is some new discovery. You don't "hope" you get erect for someone. That's the difference. You do or you don't. A woman doesn't hope they're horny for a guy. They either are or they aren't. They are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:47 PM
–

You wrote: Men certainly aren’t deliberately hooking up with women they don’t get erect for. Nor are women. You're changing your argument. Your comparison of being erect and a woman having an orgasm is just plain wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:34 PM
–

In your statement, if someone wrote women aren't sleeping with men they don't have orgasms with, that would be really dumb. Women do get horny or wet for certain men. That's the equivalent. ETA: and you clearly haven't heard of men going soft during sex because the woman is terrible in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:27 PM
–

What? Being erect and having an orgasm are two very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:24 PM
5

Link your study.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 01:54 PM
1

Then why are you going back and forth on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 01:46 PM
1

No it isn't. It's a life well lived. Women are told to prioritize their happiness all the time. How dare you think men shouldn't have the same privilege. Ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 03:01 AM
1

It actually doesn't reinforce anything. Men need to focus on their happiness and do what makes them happy. Wealthy people take their own lives. A longer life span doesn't mean a better life. More responsible, that's a view from others and it means in service to others - men should focus on what makes them and not what benefits others. Engage in less risky behaviors, again, what benefits others, not what makes men happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 01:56 AM
-2

Life satisfaction and happiness are not the same. English is hard for some of you. I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 01:48 AM
0

Funny it doesn't say happier. Focus on your happiness. That is all that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:31 AM
6

Slaves typically don't have a choice. You do, you just don't like the choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 11:18 AM
9

Did the husband not provide the wife with sex? I'm confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 10:51 PM
4

I actually think that changed under the TCJA passed in 2017. Transfers are no longer tax deductible, at least at the federal level.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 10:46 PM
25

Disagree. Having forced sex is ridiculous under any circumstance and would be contrary to public policy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 10:43 PM
–

Woah. Didn't know you knew what I cared about. So on one hand, you write why men should care but then turn around and proclaim, you don't care. Make up your mind. The need to be right makes you sound crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 11:17 AM
1

Maybe if you used that large brain of yours, you would have gotten it on the first try. But you know, mush and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 01:51 AM
2

Ah, so you don't think those women didn't really give a fuck about women's rights but were doing it to say fuck you to men in a fit if lonely woman rage. I think your brain is pretty fucked to try to explain or reason through anything. But I'm just an observer of your tortured logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 01:48 AM
2

What action did I ascribe to them? I'd like to tease that out a little more.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 01:30 AM
2

You think the 4B movement is "made up"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:25 PM
6

Likewise for the 4B movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:05 PM
1

It's called reversion to the mean. It occurs in nature and there was no way that the women who lashed out using this threat were going to keep it up. Give up free dinners, attention and sex possibly with the UbërChad? We're talking about an increasingly undisciplined generation of people here whose activism comes in the form of TikTok posts that go viral for 10 minutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:01 PM
0

We care because women care. That's the point. No, it wouldn't. In theory, men would just make more. Women are the ones who argued it was a zero sum game.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:24 PM
2

No it doesn't. Men are the ones being told to tackle the pay gap. The fact that it's essentially zero tells you men had to care about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:15 PM
3

Pay gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:06 PM
1

They scream like banshees about revenge fantasies when they are the primary purveyors of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:35 AM
5

They're using the same statistics that they responded to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:33 AM
2

Would it be fair for those men to act like women who can't get a man today and complain? Seems egalitarian to me, unless you believe women should have a special pass to bitch and complain while men should shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:31 AM
3

Talking about problems incessantly but not wanting to solve those problems. The joy is in the complaining, not the solution. If they have nothing to complain about, it's like a ship lost at sea.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 03:34 PM
1

It's pure cope. They're ok in bed, not in life, and it hurts to come to that realization.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:06 PM
4

What happened to that intuition thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:05 PM
3

Please don't. You're wasting everyone else's as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:04 PM
1

How about coming up with actual real life material rather than relying on "look at this sub over there!!! See I told ya!!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:02 PM
3

You have no point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:01 PM
3

You don't think women complain about emotionally unavailable men in real life? You think that's a revenge fantasy?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:42 PM
4

Yes - you think a person to split expenses with is a feature of a bangmaid, not an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:41 PM
3

Then what do you think is the obnoxious therapy speak that women use when they are on some guys roster? You don't think labeling a guy emotionally unavailable is a complaint?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:40 PM
3

I'm sorry, this is pathetic. What details in particular? An entire sub of women who weren't intelligent enough to know they wanted to get married and that their partners dragging their feet was indicative of them not wanting the same? You're the one consuming these echo chambers for your own fantasies. What percentage of the population do these women represent exactly since you've consumed it all?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:39 PM
7

More like, stop complaining when they don't want to be with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:23 PM
5

You described it, pretty succinctly. I don't need to read women complaining on the Internet about their choices. You describe men as dragging their feet on marriage as emotionally unavailable. If marriage was important to them, they'd find people who'd want to marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:20 PM
11

Maybe it's time to look in the mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:18 PM
5

You folks come up with the most ridiculous terms. A woman being an adult now means she's a bangmaid ?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:17 PM
2

Emotionally unavailable does not mean not wanting to get married. That's ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 12:15 PM
-1

Why would you let your girlfriend stop you from finding the love of your life?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 11:15 PM
2

Because they don't have to carry them. Now provide an answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:30 AM
2

How attractive is Sally?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:34 AM
1

Women don't realize it's a swamp because they are in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:19 AM
5

If women don't want to have babies, why are they having them. No one is forcing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:12 AM
2

This has nothing to do with people carrying their weight. It has everything to do with materialism. If you can't tell the difference, might be why you're single.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 01:19 AM
2

Of course you woman would discount men for materialistic reasons. We already know that. Thanks for saying it out loud.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 12:09 AM
2

Here we go. Part of the women are never wrong crew
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 11:45 PM
1

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 11:40 PM
1

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 11:38 PM
2

Some of the messiest dirtiest people I've encountered in their home life were women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 11:35 PM
1

I said this in a prior post. For women, you can never blame women for their decisions. Even if they choose to be the 9th baby mother. The blame must always be on the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 11:30 PM
1

They're poor
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 03:24 PM
0

of course this would be deleted by the mods although it rebuts the initial claim of the post - the point is they are lying Of course. The woman in the post you linked said it perfectly. Size never mattered° with her partners, but her ex was huge, while her current boyfriend is small. It's virtue signaling because they can't be seen body shaming, they have a reputation to uphold. But in the back of their minds, you're inadequate. ° - Unless you meet the minimum size requirement
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 02:48 PM
–

Because women are even more homophobic than men are. Rules for thee, not for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 02:04 PM
–

Of course. The woman in the post you linked said it perfectly. Size never mattered° with her partners, but her ex was huge, while her current boyfriend is small. It's cute signaling because they can't be seen body shaming, they have a reputation to uphold. But in the back of their minds, you're inadequate. ° - Unless you meet the minimum size requirement
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:25 AM
5

Sure. There's the example of when women cheat on their spouses. Cheating Is Now Being Described as a Feminist Act of Self-Care "She was interviewed by Bustle in an article entitled "When Having An Affair Is An Act Of Self-Care," which claimed that infidelity can actually be a feminist act of empowerment for women. In some of Piazza's interviews, the women gave various reasons for their affairs: they were unhappy and not sexually satisfied by their husband, they were unfulfilled during the Covid …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 07:48 PM
4

Those are called simps or the male orbiters who seek out crumbs of pussy wherever they go. This is a core belief of the sisterhood. That there are certain men who internalize it doesn't change that fact. Stop centering men in this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 03:56 PM
16

If a woman does something that is clearly wrong, blame a man, blame the patriarchy or blame society. A woman is never responsible for her own actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 03:36 PM
0

And when the UbërChad comes along...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 02:03 AM
2

You don't need a course to go to the gym, excel at work or be social.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:24 PM
1

the physical experience of sex is the discussion, not "happiness". part of being responsible for my own "happiness" is having a partner who is good in bed
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:15 PM
3

Are you reading the thread or just making stuff up. The person three posts above said women don't judge those men. You gotta try reading sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 05:04 PM
-1

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 04:59 PM
1

Ok, so you don't think wanting 25k per cheek is prostitution. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 04:38 PM
1

Wait, she's old enough to do drugs but not have sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 04:30 PM
-3

Now you get it! So happy how it took you one paragraph to contradict yourself and get the actual point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 04:16 PM
1

Yes, that's my default. He's innocent until evidence shows otherwise. Asking that a "big black baby" be put in you and asking for "baby gravy", saying “i wanna be abused daddy", “i want u to tie me up like this and abuse me daddy”, “I want like some hardcore bdsm action tho", “tie me up and do bad things to me", “put a dog collar around my neck”, “I know u miss this big juicy ass…$25k for each cheek", and said if she sent him $50,000 she could come over to his house. Sure sounds like prostitutio…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:48 PM
-1

She doesn't. It's pure virtue signaling painting women in the reasonable, perfect light. "Of course we don't judge" they proclaim, while the reality tells a different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:34 PM
-2

I want you to read your own response. Desirable and good, aka being happy with the sex you're having, is your responsibility. Stop relying on others to do that for you. Sounds lazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:31 PM
1

Do you know? Maybe she was, maybe she wasn't. Maybe she was paid in kind. You seem to have actual knowledge of the situation given your posts here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:11 PM
-2

What kind of monster uses a woman he cares about for his sole sexual gratification when he can do it himself? One who's paying for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:47 PM
-1

I don't know what this is supposed to mean in the context of my response. It's sort of self evident by my statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:43 PM
0

You're responsible for your own happiness
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:16 PM
1

So you are basing what happened in this situation on "other people have done it." If that's the baseline you're going to use, let's take it to its ultimate conclusion. Prostitution is the world's oldest profession. That must be what happened here. Just whore culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:11 PM
1

Let’s not get personal. Yet you follow it up with At 19, everyone still makes stupid decisions, the difference here is the older person manipulating them into it. Because you seem to have actual knowledge that this is what happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 11:10 AM
2

Where exactly did you read the word feminist?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 03:51 AM
1

but still won't force them Where in any of this says does it say "forced"? When did advising become forcing in your mind? People have their right with their own preference, I don't know but you seem to have a problem with that. But yeah, again I won't force you if that's your preferred way of thinking after all we have our own mind to decide. If you still can't understand that, keep barking. I won't mind So again, you don't have any advice for the high school dropout not willing to work until an…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 02:05 AM
-2

Ah yes, yet again, women are never responsible for the choices they make.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:57 AM
3

You said you wouldn't advise them in the first place, so I'm not sure why you're saying it's up to them to decide. You wouldn't get to the deciding part in the first place because you wouldn't say anything. I didn't say I expected them to do anything. That's you adding additional things that weren't written in my response. I asked you how would you advise someone. And you said you wouldn't because that's their preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:52 AM
2

Meaning you wouldn't advise this wayward person of reality when they hold unrealistic expectations. You don't advise friends or others when they're about to do something foolish, you just call it their "preference". I completely understand how you approach those around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:42 AM
2

So you would tell them nothing and have them go on their way? Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 01:38 AM
2

It's not a matter of "fighting my battle", it's a matter of consistency & intellectual honesty. Either you have a problem with a particular argument, or you simply don't. It can't be both, that's too convenient. Again, you want me to respond to others comments. Rather than focusing on the question you asked and the answer you got from me, you deflect to another comment that wasn't yours. What does that have to do with me exactly? Nothing, that's the answer. Or just say you're being disingenuous …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 09:29 PM
1

You misunderstand. You clearly had the presence of mind to make decisions at 19 years old that you thought were beneficial for you. Was rough kinky sex with 54 year olds one of the decisions you made or didn't understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:27 PM
2

No, I literally responded to your comment. Now you want me to fight your battle with every other person you're engaging with? It's not cherry picking. It's literally responding to your top level comment. Do you not know how this works?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:26 PM
3

So you would counsel a high school dropout with no work experience who was holding out for a job that paid 1,000,000 per year to stick with their preferences? How would you counsel such a person?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:23 PM
2

Why are you telling me someone else's argument when I directly responded to your comment. If you have any response to my comment, I'm willing to engage.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:13 PM
2

Oh, so your prefrontal cortex was just fine... Good to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:11 PM
1

Women want men who other women want. That simple. Regardless of what people may say here, the men they attract continue to be one of the most powerful barometers of their attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:10 PM
7

She's younger, and therefore not a mature adult, even though feminists love spreading the propaganda that women "mature faster". That's the funny part. "Women are more mature" but then turn around and say "she didn't know what she was doing". It's ridiculous. Guess she risks losing out on her human right of being a gold-digger. Correct. I wish these women would call a spade a spade. They want her to walk away with 50 million because girl power and that's it. If she's old enough to be an internet…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 08:08 PM
-2

Emotional cheating is whatever is making that other person insecure at the time. It's so vaguely defined that anything falls under the definition. Remember, the same people who champion this idea of "emotional cheating" in one breath will turn around and tell you that no relationship can fulfill all your needs and you need to retain your other relationships. It's a catch-22. You can never win. The goalposts will move to where they need to to accuse you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:59 PM
4

Name the power imbalance.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:58 PM
1

So are you saying 19 year old men in college who rape women are not responsible for their actions because of their prefrontal cortex?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:51 PM
2

There was no relationship. It was sex. So your question is why seek sex with a younger woman? Maybe they are better at it, much like you would choose a 19 year old basketball player other a 54 year old one.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:36 PM
16

Please tell me how her prefrontal cortex is developed enough to file a lawsuit for 50 million dollars, but not developed enough to engage in consensual sex with a popular media figure?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:29 PM
7

She's old enough to know what baby gravy is and how babies are made, but of course her prefrontal cortex is all fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:27 PM
4

Enough to have applied to college, gotten in, understood my financial aid package, chosen a major, worked a few internships, be responsible for my academic work and overall life on a college campus, and not engage in kinky rough sex. That's how intelligent I was.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:26 PM
7

Exactly. They run around screaming "sleep with them all sis", "have your hoe phase", and other such ridiculous platitudes. But when they go and do that, all of a sudden, they are victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 07:16 PM
4

Then they should contact the police when a crime has occurred. Not sue for 50 million.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:34 PM
5

Have you considered that she also may have consented? Do you not think 50 million dollars is sufficient incentive to say something you consented to wasn't in fact consent? What's strange with some of the responses here is that she's too young and her prefrontal cortex is not developed enough but it is developed enough to sue someone for 50 million dollars?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:33 PM
5

You don't know that and you don't know her. I don't know how you people dismiss stuff and substitute your own narratives for a situation you know nothing about. You folks love infantilizing women when it fits your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:25 PM
9

He holds all the cards, and that creates a situation where he could easily exploit his position. What position does he hold exactly that he is exploiting? Does he employ her? Does he control any stream of revenues that she relies on?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:54 PM
7

Most 19 year olds aren't online Onlyfan models.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:50 PM
4

It's not a criminal case (for a reason I would say - if he committed a crime, adjudicate it through the courts). It's purposely civil so the lower "more likely than not" standard holds and she can get a pay day. Also, it's not really innocent until proven guilty. More like not guilty until proven guilty.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:50 PM
5

When you send text messages saying you want someone to put their "big black baby" inside you, yes, that may constitute as crazy and not a victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:47 PM
9

This is the only thing
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 05:45 PM
–

Show evidence they funded the creation of the show.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 03:06 AM
2

Lol. So any movie can qualify, independent of its content. I can see why no one takes red pill shit seriously. You trip over your own nonsense fighting windmills.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:46 AM
–

Ya love making stuff up and calling everything else a psy-op. It's funny actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:43 AM
4

No one's arguing in bad faith except the person claiming Netflix needs a marketing budget from the UK government.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:36 AM
1

No one's arguing in bad faith except the person claiming Netflix needs a marketing budget from the UK government.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:36 AM
5

Except I didn't say that. See the edited response. You get this work if you are jumping in and defend it. It's your argument now. I reject that interpretation in its totality. The NGO Tender is focused on creating healthy relationships the same way the Nazi Party was an organization focused on creating solidarity among German workers. It's a lie. Well, good for you then. You keep on insisting with this "after the fact" as if it means something. But it doesn't. It does. If I create a fucking comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:29 AM
4

No, what we're not going to do is move the goalposts here. Stand on what you said. You said it was "funded by the government" then quote "through an NGO called Tender". When that argument falls apart, you're now talking post show creation, after it got popular and the govt wants parents and kids to see this, and an NGO focused on creating healthy relationships says they want to create educational materials around it, now you want to talk about marketing after the fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:20 AM
–

“The government spent £3.4m funding its promotion and likely its creation through an NGO called Tender.” They funded the promotion because they think all parents and students should see it. That's after the fact. There's no evidence except this guy saying "likely funded its creation." A cursory search of the involvement would clear this up. https://tender.org.uk/tender-joins-efforts-to-bring-adolescence-to-all-uk-secondary-schools/ Why would Tender join efforts to show a series in that they crea…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 02:11 AM
–

Order of operations is all wrong. And you completely made up that it was "funded in part by the government". In fact, the chi creator of the show implored the UK government to keep funding to the BBC and publicly funded stations saying it was not up to Netflix to fill the gap if public interest shows. But addressing your psy-op point - are you saying the increase in teen boys stabbing teen girls in the UK wasn't real? The government is recognizing loners, etc... that may be a threat, identifying…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:08 AM
–

So it's a psy-op unless it agrees with your preconceived belief? That's strange.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 10:39 PM
5

It allows them to say they owned the libs.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 10:59 PM
1

How is this a racially charged comment when it's in fact what this administration is doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 11:17 PM
1

One rooted in reality and facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 12:08 AM
1

I'm sure you're the believer that highlighting Jackie Robinson's contributions to the military is DEI that doesn't hold up to the same "standards" of white people who fought?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 12:05 AM
-7

You have no idea what DEI is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 11:04 PM
-1

In study after study, in group violence is a greater threat than out group violence. Explain why gender should be different.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 02:41 AM
0

And no other sex hates women more than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 01:11 AM
3

Happy women don't complain on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 12:42 AM
7

A common saying whenever i have argued with women on tt and reddit Your first mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 09:58 PM
1

You're surprised that guys don't care about your degrees, but you just explained why. They may be attracted to your personality and qualities which is different than being attracted to your degree. Again, your degrees contribute nothing to being a good partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:48 AM
1

What about your two degrees make you a good partner? Do you have degrees in empathy, good communication, listening, constructive arguing, compromise, etc? What does your transcript say about those courses?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 11:56 PM
2

Ok, why do you care though? If someone wants to not have sex for whatever reason, they are well within their rights to. What does "won't work" mean here?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 03:58 PM
0

Never wrote that. But they clearly went to where the successful men were, infiltrating their spaces for their ultimate goal: SAHW.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 08:13 PM
1

Looking for a husband so they can stay at home
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 12:35 PM
0

The vast majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 12:33 PM
3

Your data set has 2.1mm total women. 1.6mm are listed as unmarried, no partner households. 1.4mn are listed as never married. If you look at the unmarried, no partner, 1.6/2 = 80%. You're double counting somewhere because 50% doesn't make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:20 PM
3

You may want to do your math again.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:43 PM
2

Is this counting older women who were likely to be married earlier?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:07 AM
4

Or even simpler - women should approach and stop using those dumb signals.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:06 AM
7

And men should not approach them. This is what they asked for. Didn't buy into their feelings
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 04:02 AM
3

Remember that even the accusation is sufficient to ruin you. No one ever says you're innocent. They only say there's not enough evidence to charge you, always keeping the cloud of suspicion over you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:58 AM
5

Why would they admit defeat in real life?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 03:52 AM
3

This is an excellent development. This is what women wanted and finally women are being made to be safe in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 02:48 AM
1

Generally agree. How would you prevent men who used sperm banks from being caught up in this dragnet?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 03:12 PM
2

Why do folks keep asking this question when they know they will getting a bunch of gaslight type answers?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 10:32 PM
5

I have multiple mental illnesses and PMDD. Even just ovulation hormones affect my mental health. And this is the reason you should probably stay off the Internet and not worry about what strangers are writing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 06:58 PM
0

So he doesn't care "a lot" about your income. Rather, how about you define eggs "a lot" is? An example - I care a lot that my girlfriend is not abusive. I'm not going to accept abuse, temporarily, for 3 months. We just won't be together. So if he cares a lot about your income, what you're saying is there's a limit to your unemployment, that he'll break up with you, even if the job market is terrible? Of course, there are limits. He'd almost certainly break up with me if I decided to be a "homema…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 04:27 PM
0

Everyone thinks they're normal and everyone else isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 03:02 PM
1

We're not talking about crime. You're talking about makeup. "Modern women want the authority of men, the privilege of being female, and the responsibility of a child" - this quote becomes clearer and clearer every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 03:00 PM
1

Women spend money creating the fake image men want I thought women were independent and did things for themselves. Or is that only when you choose to use that argument. When it's time to blame your choices on men, then you shift the responsibility huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:31 PM
1

Lol. You just went on and on about women prettying themselves up. The only equivalent you can find for men is "well, they choose to spend money on women". It shows how disingenuous and empty your arguments are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:17 PM
1

The underlying assumption is because men feel worse about themselves, it must be from intimidation. That's what you wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:10 PM
1

So he would break up with you if you lost your income?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:07 PM
2

Yes, women spend money to acquire what others want (an artificial look of beauty) What they think others (who they want) want. You folks never seem to acknowledge personal choice. It's always somebody else's fault that you make the choices you do. Men spend money on themselves to acquire what they want (a fake image of a womanz0. No they don't. They spend it on women because that's what women typically demand they do. Saying a coffee date isn't shit because it's "low effort" as an example. Nice …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:04 PM
1

If they actually cared, they wouldn't have dated you in the first place. It was likely the women in their family who cared.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:00 PM
1

Actually men tend to feel worse about themselves when their female partners are successful so there is some factual basis for the “men feel intimidated by successful women” trope. You guys love this intimidation trope. It could never be that the woman is an asshole and verbally abused him because she thinks she's better than him since she makes more money. Ah, but have a man make more money and all of a sudden, he's controlling and abusive. You guys don't even pretend to hide your women are wond…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:54 PM
2

In comfortable and/or functional clothing men and women's bodies do not look very different. Only a small portion of women naturally have the large breasts that fascinate men so much and those women usually have some fat on them. What? Please take a biology class. This is unhinged. Healthy weight is whatever it takes to not be tortured by hunger pains continually. It's plumper than most men want (i.e., usually size 12 and up). Ok, you should have just said fat because that's what you're trying t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:52 PM
1

I'm glad you can tell the difference. One spends it on others, one spends it on themselves. Now you got it!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:49 PM
2

Surprise in our natural states (no make-up, comfortable clothes, easy to manage hair, healthy weight as opposed to starving, etc.), women and men look more or less the same. So what you are saying is that heterosexual men are not attracted to normal women only to an artificial image. No you don't. Men's and women's bodies are very different. What a ridiculous statement. Men generally do not have large breast. Men tend to be larger and more muscular. Is "healthy weight' your way of saying fat?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:43 PM
2

Women have to spend incredible amounts of money and time to conform to the beauty ideals men want. No. Women spend incredible amounts of money to conform to the beauty ideals of the men they want. Again, you do it for yourself. A lot of men make comments about how unattractive (butch masculine) lesbian women look to them. Surprise. Heterosexual men are not attracted to men-like persons.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:24 PM
1

After BLM, in some cities, police are no longer wanted. Isn’t it valid to ask “why is the legitimacy of an institution important” in situations like that? Sure, it's a valid question but we operate in a democracy, so we already have the answer. Those asking whether police were legitimate were a minority of the population. Don't let popular culture and the flavor of the day rot your brain. ACAB and Defund the police are conversations centered around delegitimizing the police. Who cares. Also, fuc…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 10:44 AM
0

Do you ask this of the courts and do you ask the same of the police and firefighters? You think anyone should just be able to imprison someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 11:02 PM
1

You're mixing up two different arguments (I don't know if on purpose) and combining them to criticize an argument of your own making. No where in this post does it say marrying someone with a vapid job is somehow illegitimate. It clearly says jobs have been increasingly developed with no benefits to society and it's among that vein and thinking that people view marriages with the same vapidness that they reward empty calorie jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 10:58 PM
0

This is marriage vs wedding. Effectively, judging a presidency by the inauguration. They are not the same. That being said, it seems many women want the latter while not being prepared for the rights of the former, hence the high rates of failures in the institution. The public show takes on more importance.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 10:48 PM
-3

and there wouldn't be so many women with a boyfriend/husband and a male best friend who they know fucked longer than their husband/boyfriend. FTFY
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 10:41 PM
0

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:08 AM
3

Again, I didn't ask for your absurd opinion on what mothers should do to feed hungry children, I simply was pointing out that you acted as though it affected both mothers and fathers yet the scenario is specifically predicated on it disproportionately affecting women and children. I keep telling you I don't care yet you keep repeating the same thing. Billions of people keep the world going that don't have anything to do with the food supply. Ok. Sure. Again, folks can find their own food.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:07 AM
6

I didn't ask whether it moved you, I was pointing out that you acted as though it affected both parents yet the scenario is specifically predicated on it disproportionately affecting women and children. Again, if the parents cared about their children, they would forage and hunt. Why should I care more than them about their own offspring? I see, so women and children suffer just because? No, so folks don't take for granted who keeps the world going.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:29 AM
0

Except, as you already noted, it's actually the mother who has to sacrifice for a hungry child, and it is the child who suffers. This doesn't move me. Lots of children have died. How does that affect the dating market, though? I don't know, but it will definitely shift decision making.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:13 AM
1

A free, raw, unadulterated market. We can see how folks truly operate when the spigot of cash is turned off and they truly must make their own way. If kids go hungry, who cares. Their parents should think of that before giving birth. The parents should go out into nature to procure food just like folks in the past did.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:30 AM
2

Meaning turning off the spigot of welfare and social supports.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:25 AM
–

Women are the ones who are extremely homophobic. Their number one insult to men they don't agree with is to call them gay as an insult. That stems from a deep hatred of men of all types, misandry that crosses sexual orientation. The hilarious thing about it is they use gay men as accessories and entertainment. But once you see their ire, their true colors will come out, and they will throw being gay around as an insult quite easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:10 AM
1

What is the difference? What is the difference between women who dropped out of school in the US vs those in other countries?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 11:13 AM
2

And regular women who parrot those same words.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:19 PM
1

At least you can admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:18 PM
5

Yes they are. You are screaming "men ain't shit". Has the misandry against men in your own country all of the sudden gone away because it's so ingrained in you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:14 PM
0

I mean you're a colonialist...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:11 PM
3

OP will never address this because American exceptionalism and their natalist nationalist thinking means that by virtue of being American, you are better and more powerful.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:00 PM
1

Ok, and? This doesn't really answer the question except you saying you want everyone to embrace promiscuity as you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:51 PM
1

The same reason you don't want to kiss a girl who had a train run on her by 15 guys. Like I said, it's a more restrictive condition than yours, but you have a restrictive condition nonetheless (compared to the man willing to eat the remains of that train).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:07 PM
–

Not interested in putting my penis where shit has been.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 04:01 PM
1

It’s unnecessary because nobody really has to do that. Honestly, I don’t even really have to kiss her or have sex with her If no one has to do it, then what's the point of your post. Are you arguing someone has to be in a relationship with someone with a high body count?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 03:57 PM
1

Deciding that she wouldn’t be a good fit personality wise just because she has or has had a lot of sex in her past is an unnecessary limit. Why? You seem to be able to articulate limits on who you'll be intimate with (women who have had trains run on them within the last hour). It's unnecessary because it doesn't match yours? People are still gonna be like well she might leave you because she had a lot of sex in the past. But thats not exactly a fact, especially if she was like a sex worker or a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:55 PM
1

Happy reading: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25787208/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:47 PM
1

Kissing a girl isn't gay. I didn't say it was the same as you saying she never would do it, I'm saying that you are placing limits on how you would interact with her. You are questioning how others could put even more restrictive limits than you, when there could very well be a guy out there who would eat the cum out of her after getting a train run on her who would question why you're being so restrictive? And according to them, you'd be unintelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:45 PM
1

Maybe you're confused about the psychological aspects of sex. Buying flowers and giving a huge speech are not examples of that. And again, crazy perfect sex is your description of it. Ask your partner if that's how they feel. Psychological doesn't mean personality either, so I am very confused by that response. Maybe there needs to be a primer on what these words and terms mean before having this conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:40 PM
1

So you do care, even someone as intelligent as you say you are, and you understand limits. But you've originally questioned how these limits can exist if one is intelligent. You gotta make it make sense. If everything is on the table and it shouldn't impact how one feels about high n-count people, then one would assume you would have no problem with this above scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:26 PM
2

I’m also not gay so that kind of limits what i’d want her doing with men. What does her having a train run in her by 15 guys connect to you being gay? This makes no sense that this would limit what you want your partner doing with other men. Are you saying her sleeping with 15 guys means you're sleeping with 15 guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:09 PM
2

I don’t really understand why people combine those things and the sex together. Sex is the physical stuff, love is all the other stuff and more… You don't think sex has a psychological aspect to it? "Sex is the physical stuff" would imply that people can just have sex without arousal. You're just doing work after all. No normal person has the definition of sex as just the physical stuff. It's been recognized that sex has various aspects to it. If you want to define it strictly as when a penis en…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:53 PM
2

So an hour after 15 guys (known to her) have run a train on her, you'd be perfectly fine with kissing her and being intimate?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:35 PM
1

Sure doesn't sound like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:32 PM
2

I'll put it more succinctly - people, esp women, generally don't want to feel used for sex despite how good it may be.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:26 PM
2

As in sex is more than the act. It involves foreplay, it involves how one is treated afterwards. Good sex can be remembered as bad sex if the person is left alone in a bad emotional state. How about talking to women about the various components - like if someone had sex with them, then immediately left without a word and ghosted them, would they believe all sex is good sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:23 PM
1

Lol, ok... this only happens in porn and there aren't people who don't give a shit about the person they are having sex with and have their sex acts reflect porn. Go talk to human beings for once.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:09 PM
3

This is you right? How does love make the sex better. You're defining sex as the act and nothing more. What happens before and after doesn't matter to you. If you think love doesn't imply care and having repeated sex with people who don't give a damn about you doesn't matter because it's all the same, go right on ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:08 PM
2

How long have you been waiting to write this?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:14 AM
6

Ah yes, someone taking you to poundtown and nutting on your face, then putting their pants on and leaving 2 minutes after it happened is the same as being in a committed relationship where the person actually gives a damn how you feel/are afterwards. That's exactly the same and the relationship doesn't make a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 11:12 AM
1

Do you know what an ultimatum is? Threatening to break up if you don't get marriage means you actually want the relationship. It makes no sense to tell someone unless you commit to be in a relationship with me forever*, I'll leave this relationship with you. You're breaking up because you're not getting what you want, not because you don't want to be in a relationship with the person.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 07:08 PM
1

These men are the most annoying. They stand for nothing thus they fall for anything. Whenever the winds are blowing with the trendiest women's trend du jour, they will follow along because they are generally spineless individuals. They scrape for crumbs of pussy whether they can find it. Remember, those who are in that NLOBs don't claim it as a badge of honor. Others will determine that without you saying much.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:12 PM
–

As if these are the only afflictions available. Next time, focus on what's said and not what you're wrongly inferring.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:08 PM
–

I like the part where you believe that simply wanting to have children means that someone will be a good parent who won’t potentially damage their kids. Where was this said exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:34 PM
–

Please be serious. Children are absolutely forced to participate, and told it is their obligation to have children. Is it your argument that how we're raised has no influence on how we behave? Sure it does, but every adult has the right to make their own decisions. At some point, you're responsible for your life and can't keep blaming everyone else. You know very well I'm not talking about what they personally do, I'm talking about what they keep trying to tell and make other women do. My argume…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:34 PM
–

Not now in the Western world. Throughout time and space? Yes, we were. Largely due to religious codification of this coercion. Free will and free choice are parts of religion. No one is forced to participate in religion. Again, when you give women the choice, and - this is key here - the ability to avoid it - many women opt-out. The birth rates reflect this accordingly. Good. If we truly wanted it, then men wouldn't have to beat us over the head about it being our "duty" and "the economy" and "m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 03:33 AM
1

Ultimatums aren't choices. They are demands.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 03:10 AM
–

It's not new-found neuroticism to not want kids. If it was so natural for women to have kids then we wouldn't need to be coerced into having them. Women aren't coerced into having kids. Women have multiple forms of birth control. Women go to sperm banks on their own. Women have the babies of men they don't even me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 03:08 AM
-2

This is true. Why would we even want people who don't want children having children. This new found neuroticism can end in a generation or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:54 PM
5

You really have to realize how asinine this comment is. Saying "if you don't propose or marry me, I'll leave you" is not wanting to not be in a relationship. It's an ultimatum to force someone into action by issuing a threat. Because why would it make sense for someone to ask for what is supposed to be a public lifelong commitment if they in fact didn't want to be in that relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:35 PM
5

It's a catch-22 and built in coping mechanism. If they do get married, it is their choice. If they can't marry the person they want, it's not because they are undesirable, rather, it's because they've opted out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:30 PM
1

If you need 1200 documents to feel comfortable marrying, you’re not ready. What 1,200 documents are you referring to?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:20 PM
0

This is a good thing. The gene pool will end for those who don't want children.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:06 PM
–

That's exactly what's being said.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:44 PM
1

Did you miss "if that's your conclusion, good for you". You're not every woman, so, not all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 05:33 PM
–

So why did you ask me in the first place if you knew the answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 05:27 PM
–

Maybe. I'm not a woman. Ask them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 05:20 PM
–

I don't care about the birth rate. It doesn't concern me. Just like we don't want the government dictating reproductive decisions of women, this shouldn't concern anyone except women who want to have children, or not. Let's keep the government and others out of the bedroom and all that flows from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:54 PM
–

I don't need to. People make decisions based on their individual circumstances. Maybe they are risk seekers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:52 PM
–

I didn't really care about the fertility rate. What others do with their body isn't my concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:51 PM
–

Your body, your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:41 PM
–

If that's the conclusion you reach, good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:40 PM
–

Hypergamy has nothing to do with working or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:39 PM
–

Whatever works for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 02:32 PM
–

You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 02:32 PM
–

Then sounds like that's fair!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:52 PM
–

And if they have children? Who pays for childcare? Childcare isn't an asset. The cost should be shared proportional to earning ability as it currently is done. And if it turns out that the family actually saves money if one spouse stays home for a few years, does that mean that spouse gets less in a divorce settlement? Yes. If the spouse stayed home, one assumes that income earned < economic value of staying home, otherwise income earned > economic value of staying home. In that case (staying ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:48 PM
–

I suggest you do your own laundry, cook your own food and clean your own space and 50% of common spaces. Women tend to have more clothing than men, so that wouldn't be 50/50. Those others tend to have disparities as well, so might as well make it proportionate to your use.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:40 PM
–

What? You just said they don't. Now you're saying so many women decide to not have kids with a partner until they've entered one of these legal agreements? They don’t, otherwise women wouldn’t have kids, but it becomes an issue during separation where the sacrifices they make fuck them over, because it’s more often than not the woman who gets hit with the economic detriment of being in a relationship. Which one is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:38 PM
–

Then if women choose to have children, they shouldn't blame or use that as some rationale as why they deserve something after the fact. Their body, their choice. Women are intelligent enough to weigh the risk/reward trade-offs of their decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:12 PM
–

Agreed upon unpaid labor. If you want to send the Smiths a Christmas card on behalf of the family and the other person has no interest, and you do it anyway, that's not unpaid labor. That's a personal obsession.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:09 PM
–

Community assets should be split by the proportion that they were financed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:04 PM
–

This is why women should be upfront and let their partners know that they value their lifetime earnings over having children.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:59 AM
–

Hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:57 AM
5

How many bears have you encountered in your lifetime? Also, name an area of the world where there are no men. Then name an area where there are no bears.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:40 AM
3

Saying the proverbial "he" who you refer to thinking of single mothers as a piece of meat is pure cope. "He" views her as a liability. You get it now?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:31 PM
4

Clearly I disagree by responding with what she actually is: a liability.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:18 PM
3

She's a liability.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 03:48 PM
13

Exactly. Might as well sit in the corner watching her get pounded by her baby daddy. You'll get your gift in 9 months.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 03:47 PM
2

HVMs want children, so a single mom actually is bringing MORE to the table automatically HVMs want their own children, so a single mom actually is bringing LESS to the table automatically Males who avoid single moms are just looking at women as a piece of meat Males who avoid single moms are just looking at women as a piece of meat liability Males who avoid single mothers likely don't have the means to provide for the child because they're broke Males who avoid single mothers likely don't have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 03:43 PM
7

Ah yes, yet another woman defining what a real man is but would have a brain aneurysm if a man would try to define what a real woman is.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 03:37 PM
1

Ah yes - the field of psychology is full of blackpillers who actually didn't do research and see the effect play out among people. Maybe you should use one of the greatest technologies known to man to just type it in and view the research on the topic. There are academic papers you can read.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 10:56 AM
1

My experience is that stupid women consider it an all-purpose insult, as well as stupid men. FWIW, my usual insult is "idiot" and that goes for either sex. Who someone else finds attractive means very little to me. Ah yes, "they're not like us". The argument of the year. You've completely ignored that this is a common insult from women to men to seemingly attack their masculinity. So, if women are mainly homophobic while still being less homophobic than men, how do you explain society's (UK, US,…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 10:48 AM
19

The first insult women generally use towards heterosexual men is calling them gay or saying they engage in gay sex acts. Yes, women are generally homophobic towards gay men. I've known very, very few hetero women reject friendship with gay or bi men based on their sexual preference. Of course they don't because it provides social currency and entertainment for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 12:15 AM
0

Given the amount of women who use homophobic slurs to insult heterosexual men, I'd venture to say most women are homophobic towards gay men unless that gay man is providing them social currency and entertainment. Then they are homophobic behind that man's back.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 12:12 AM
53

This is what women wanted. They said they wanted bears approaching them. Why are they all Pikachu face over these findings, calling men lazy? Lazy men gives them more opportunity for the bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 12:03 AM
8

Only the good actions are gendered generalizations of women. Anything negative, NAWALT!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 11:53 PM
30

This is a necessary post. Women do agree on one thing though, not holding one another accountable for the statements they've made. They'll argue you, a man, to death with "not all, not all, not all" to invalidate a clearly articulated point. But they will say nothing when one of their gender says the same because 🤝. Oh, I forgot to add: not all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 11:49 PM
1

They aren't. It's the women are wonderful effect at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 09:11 PM
0

Oh I'm sorry, you said most men don't care about getting a woman off. Where did I say this? Please quote. Thx. Whatever the case may be, you men are the ones dumb and desperate enough to fuck women you don't even find attractive,thus making you community dick. That's why your dick is so little Can you connect dick size with choice of woman to fuck? How does one correlate with the other? Are implying fucking more women leads to a smaller penis size?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:31 PM
4

It doesn't. What's next?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:25 PM
1

But you said most men can't get most women off? When did I say this?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:24 PM
6

You aren't required to continue orbiting women who make terrible decisions because of their bad relationship with sex. Assuming facts not in evidence. Because of course, men must be the ones orbiting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:03 PM
2

This is what the conversation is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:58 PM
2

They don't find you attractive enough to get you off.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:56 PM
5

Yep, you're responsible for the company you keep. Funny that men here say that all the time. Do you disagree? I think there's a fundamental difference between someone who you let enter your body on a regular basis vs people who are in the same social environment, but we can differ on that I guess. Shouldn't you disclose you have problems with reading comprehension? Shouldn't you quote me instead of making things up? It was you who said you have happy and content people all around you. You asked …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:56 PM
2

Wonderful. So long as we know that we're matching energy. Maybe their laffy taffy can't get it up because of what they're looking at? Ever asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:48 PM
3

with his little laffy taffy There's the body shaming ladies and gentlemen. Sooner or later they tell on themselves. sometimes it's better if we do it by OURSELVES without a man pounding into you Sounds like terrible communication from you if all you do is get pounded all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:40 PM
8

You read that wrong. Complainers and people who have unrealistic expectations do exist, as do victims. Bad things happen and so do disappointments and setbacks. Those people talk about it, so they are overrepresented. Then you do know who this conversation is about. Good to clear that up. That's what you just said. You are the person who claimed women are responsible for getting disappointed because of the company they keep. Does that somehow not apply to you? Aren't you responsible for the comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:38 PM
2

So why not do it during sex? ETA: men can also do the same. Men do the work to have achieve their orgasm during sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:23 PM
0

So all the women you had sex with did nothing but lay there uninterested? Nope not all the women. But I guess you didn't know what the word generally means. You would have answered your own question if you did. This is an anomaly sorry to break this to you. Probably comes from a personal problem. Either you chose shitty partners or you expect women to perform like they do in porn. Anyway that's not for me to judge. Yes, women's sexual performance are men's fault. We know, we know. Women can do n…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:23 PM
5

Not all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:08 PM
1

Ah yes, the proverbial grammatical "not all women" retort. Because clearly, the discussion is about the 102 year old great grandmother in the nursing home. I'll make sure to tailor my words to exclude her. I'll also exclude the woman who was sentenced to life imprisonment for a double murder and the schizophrenic woman who's been hospitalized for the last 10 years. I forget we must be real specific for you folks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:04 PM
6

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:01 PM
3

Nope, I'm trying to use logic on an illogical person who assumes that women who complain and fail over and over at relationships represent women as a whole. Lazy, lazy, lazy. No one said it represents women as a whole, ever. Anyone who thinks this conversation is about the 96 year old nursing home patient who happens to be a woman is being purposely obtuse. Bringing this up is pure deflection. I'm talking about the same group of people you are, which is apparently your socially inept and wildly …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:00 PM
9

You accuse her of flip flopping so surely you can point me to where SHE said the things you say, "Women often say" ? If you're seriously asking "where are women saying this? Oh the shock!" - yes, women are the ones saying that men should stay women regardless of how they change in a relationship. I'm not leveling an accusation at her - I'm saying ignoring that women actually make this argument then saying no, women don't because they care about how they do look for their partner is flip flopping…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:59 PM
15

Which women? Do you spend all your time with broken, stupid women? Women who seem to can't see anything wrong with what some of their own genders does and uses tactics like "there not like us" to act like it doesn't exist. You see, to you, it either a) doesn't exist or b) if it does it exist, it's your fault that broken stupid women are around you. So heads you win, tails, I lose! As if you live in a fantasy world where everyone around you is happy, content and living like a weird stepford wife.…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:24 PM
3

So... not all of them. Are you really trying your claim on the lazy "not all" argument? People who have a complaint post about it and whine about it. They are overrepresented online and IRL because they are troubled and seeking support. "People" are not equally distributed among the genders who complain. It is by far overwhelmingly women. You don't hear from the millions of other women who are doing just fine, do you? Let me check really quick. Are we discussing the billions of people on Earth n…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:18 PM
30

Flip flopping more than a politician. Women are often saying "if your man can't accept you at your worst, he doesn't deserve you at your best" and "if you gain weight or change your appearance in a relationship, and your man complains, he's an asshole".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:10 PM
3

Where did you get this idea that women just lay down doing nothing? tik tok? Boomer humor? Not only that's not how sex is but also that's not what's being discussed. From being a man who has sex with women - women are generally lazy. Men can orgasm easier than women so it's only logical that he makes an extra effort for her to orgasm. You can't argue with biology. Completely ignoring the fact that women are not participants in their own pleasure. They expect it all to be the byproduct of the men…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:07 PM
12

When we are in a sexual RELATIONSHIP we do consider what our partner finds attractive. Doesn't seem like it. It's just about the sex in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:01 PM
48

Exactly. One of the largest fears of women is the male gaze so how dare they say they are doing anything for men now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:55 PM
34

You do it for yourself. Women have been quite clear they are not doing it for the male gaze.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:51 PM
3

That's what you think. I suppose you also assume that the only reason she's having sex is because she expects a relationship? And I suppose you also assume that she hasn't already had a relationship with purely awful, unsatisfying sex and knows she doesn't want to revisit that? Do you also believe that she benefits in any way by hanging on to her virginity like it's a precious stone that some man will exchange for an engagement ring? JFC - if she doesn't want a relationship, this conversation is…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:50 PM
4

And so does she, knowing that it's more difficult to orgasm. Laying down and expecting it to be done for you while you are a passive participant is contributing to your own disappointment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:39 PM
3

Are any terpers aware that women enjoy good sex? And that most women don't "trade" their bodies for a relationship, but enjoy the experience of good sex? Again, who is making this argument? You are purposely deflecting the point. Yes, women enjoy good sex Ms. Obvious. It's that they want a relationship with the person the good sex is coming from. Those are two different but related topics. Good sex doesn't entitle you to further good sex by way of a relationship. Women often conflate the two. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:38 PM
1

The median time for sex is 5.4 minutes. Biology is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:19 PM
4

Not much longer. The median time for sex is 5.4 minutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:18 PM
-1

So the man is responsible for his pleasure and making himself orgasm and he's responsible for making you orgasm as well? You can lay down like a star fish while he does all the work and he also needs to focus on your orgasms? While you do nothing? For him or yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:12 PM
3

Women can like the men they let rearrange their guts. No one is arguing that they can't, except you. Hell, they can even fall in love with him. But just because they let that man rearrange their guts doesn't entitle them to a relationship. That simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:09 PM
3

What is it with you women and your blatant homophobic comments? Why do you believe calling a man gay is an insult to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:02 PM
4

Yes. Waiting at the finish line to celebrate with the winner when you did nothing to help them get there is annoying. It's annoying groupie behavior. Women have the right to not date potential - they want to mitigate risks and that's just fine. But low risk, low reward.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:58 PM
12

You're wrong. It comes up when women get into situationships, undefined situations and are fucking the UbërChad and find out he has a harem of women. She believes she should be the only one and is crying to her friends and TikTok about why hasn't he made it official and I feel he's string me along and hasn't asked for something serious 😢 combined with the misguided thought of a man should ask for commitment, that's not a woman's role. When you combine all of these various thought patterns, they …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:49 PM
11

Explain the clear and present danger part.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 08:04 PM
8

It usually is because those men chose to focus and make good decisions in their younger years, delaying gratification. Those men who were out playing may enter their 30s with multiple babies by different women; some of those women also did the same after having fun in their 30s, multiple kids by multiple men. The guys who kept their head down, are moving up the corporate ladder, etc... as you said, did it on their own, now those women want to share in the success of that hard work.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 03:19 PM
1

It's not. It's cope and justification by women for being rejected by their male counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 02:28 PM
3

Rejecting women in their 30s or simply having their hoe phase and not wanting to settle down.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 02:00 PM
13

It's a narrative by women, especially those who criticize age gaps. A guy in his 30s being with a woman in her 20s is "creepy" and he must be rejecting the women his own age because he's getting revenge because they didn't choose him when he was in his 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:59 PM
5

If she was a catch, she would be caught.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:54 PM
27

They're doing it out of success, not revenge. Why wouldn't someone want to enjoy the fruits of their labor?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:49 PM
24

It's just a woman's fever dreams that men are out for revenge because the women aren't being chosen by men who become successful or are clearly on the path to success in their 30s. The wheat is quickly separated from the chaff in the 30s and is clear who is on the path to (conventional) success. They bet on the wrong horse in their 20s and when they are rejected by men who may have wanted them in their 20s, they conjure up a revenge fantasy. It's really that men don't see them as relationship ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:48 PM
4

Price discrimination in action
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 11:46 PM
1

It's about a woman who told her boyfriend that she would marry him but not have casual sex with him and he got offended by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 11:41 PM
5

It doesn't mean you have to support it, it just means you are supporting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:41 PM
3

People aren't crazy until they actually do something crazy. Does time confuse you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:25 PM
1

by claiming to want more than sex. Being vague is the opposite of making a claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:22 PM
3

You didn't have to lie to women who lie to themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:20 PM
1

I wasn't giving you my opinion. I was logically comparing your initial statement to your experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 12:15 AM
1

If what you said was true, he would have left already.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 11:11 PM
2

You might want to look up the definition of material things, because this isn’t it. Things that can be taken away from you. Your career or hobbies are two of those things. Your values, nope. So, I'm using it correctly. Someone is making things up, but it isn’t me. I have no idea where you pulled this scenario from. The person arguing passionately that career and hobbies should rank alongside valuing the person. If corporate America is that important to you, date your boss.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 09:23 PM
2

If you don’t care about what she does, who she is, her hobbies and interests and goals, how can you enjoy her company? Again - you love making stuff up. Where did I say you don't care about who she is? The problem with women like you is that you define yourself based on your careers then if you're unable to do those careers you complain that a guy left you. That's what you women care about and why guys criticize you when you often leave men after they may lose their jobs - because you define peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 09:13 PM
9

You ought to actually enjoy the company of your wife even when she isn’t sucking your dick. If you don’t, leave her alone and let her find a man who loves and appreciates who she is. What are you even talking about? Who said you don't enjoy the company of your wife? The point is you enjoy the company of the friends and your wife but there is something that differentiates the two types of relationships, isn't there? Your friend is different from your wife. I swear when some of you talk about rela…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:59 PM
4

Are you saying sex isn't a need in a relationship? I’m not saying there shouldn’t be mutual benefit in a relationship. I’m saying that beyond the confines of that mutual benefit, men don’t seem to actually care about the women they’re in relationships with. That's not what you wrote in your OP. You didn't say that men don't care about the women. You said they don't care about their careers and hobbies. Why does it matter that I care that you work in advertising or you crochet? You never actually…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:54 PM
5

You're wrong. (Now I'm talking about you). Seems like you took offense and included yourself. I don't know you, not your personality. Now if you can stop with the deflection, you can address the original point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:33 PM
1

So you include yourself in the group of people who have terrible personalities? That's on you. If that's not a general statement, then I don't know what to tell you. It honestly seems you're just deflecting at this point because you have no response. And yes, you should go out and touch grass if you personally believe that men just care about sex when being with someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:26 PM
1

So when you wrote this: The things we like/are good at only matter if it serves some sort of utility to you. Women just aren’t like this. We don’t view you as walking dildos to be replaced the second you do something that mildly annoys us. You were talking about me personally?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:18 PM
2

You don't understand talking about the general "you"? Rather, you'd take it personally? How about answering the substance of the comment. ETA: what's funny is you used the same formulation in your response by saying "we don't view YOU as walking dildos".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:14 PM
6

Why does something have to make them a better partner for you to appreciate it? Because why are they my partner? I appreciate the work and career of Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagen but I don't necessarily want her as a partner. It doesn't make me want to be with her. What I look for in a relationship is different from what I appreciate and my significant other didn't have to do things I appreciate professionally in order for them to be attractive to me. I care about how that person is in a rel…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 08:07 PM
6

In all the ways. This is not an answer. How do you choose your friends? Because I enjoy their company, I like them, we have good conversation and support one another. I don't choose my friends because they like crocheting or work as lawyers. I have a diverse set of friends with diverse interests. Isn’t it people you like and respect, people you share common interests and values with? Like and respect, yes. How is that connected to one's hobbies, education or career? Common interests, no, common …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 07:50 PM
5

Men as a whole repeatedly say they don't care about women's hobbies, careers, education, etc. How do any of these you've mentioned aid in being a better partner in a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/24 07:41 PM
1

Apologies, I was off by a factor of 10. 100 men. 99% of men, ugly or otherwise will NOT bother to try and get a woman off. Using your math.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 12:25 AM
1

So according to you, you've been with 1,000 guys and you found 1, your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 12:15 AM
4

Just say you've had bad sex all your life and you're jaded.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 08:30 PM
13

Sort of agree with this. The real orgasm is the attention she gets from others.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 03:12 PM
1

You really don't know how to answer questions do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 10:39 AM
-1

https://phpbb.lightonvedicastrology.com/viewtopic.php?t=24147
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 09:57 PM
-3

This is a first. Justifying domestic abuse has no societal consequences. Life is rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 09:08 PM
1

If you want to date men who don't respect the decisions you make and that's no means no, then you need therapy, full stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 09:04 PM
3

No means no to me. I'm not sure why you would want otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 09:00 PM
0

A woman justifying being abusive because Mitsubishi is in Gatorade certainly does have social consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 08:53 PM
1

So orgasms are the only way sex is enjoyable? That's what's being said?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 07:35 PM
1

Women aren’t punished just for “eating candy”, they’re punished for healthy amounts of sex, normal amounts of sex, any kind of sex. Sex that isn’t harmful, sex that is consensual, the “salads” if you will. How are they punished? Meaning men don't want them after they've done so?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:15 PM
–

Exactly. That's called "he's such a good friend".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 02:13 PM
3

Being food secure vs food insecure is a privilege. Surely you should agree with that. But just because your food secure doesn't mean you shouldn't be punished for eating 7,000 calories a day and weighing 350 lbs. Surely you know the difference between the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 10:55 PM
1

What spaces are you able to be in? None that I need to tell you. I don't know or care to know you. You're framing this weirdly. I'm not stating requirements, I'm just telling you how things are. Sure... By any means necessary, be interesting! I got it. You can have friends and still feel lonely dude. Yikes indeed. Listen to yourself: you can have friends who don't give a crap about you; you can have human bodies around you and still feel lonely. You call anything a friend these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 10:00 PM
1

Again, good for you. I can't say I know what lesbians like. But if you don't like men, then not sure what this conversation is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:56 PM
0

So you can make yourself orgasm while having sex with a man within 5 minutes? Then what's the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:55 PM
11

We know. People with privileges typically don't think they have that privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:50 PM
1

When did the term "random" get introduced to this?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:48 PM
-3

What's hilarious is people like you criticizing men for treating sex like porn, but when it comes to women, you think orgasming every single time you have sex is normal. You're just as bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:46 PM
1

Oh, you're a lesbian? Ok then.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:43 PM
1

😂😂 oh baby, one day you’ll learn. I get propositioned by dudes all of the time, the thing is i dont want them in my vagina like, eww? If im going to have sex, its gonna be with someone im romantically interested in. But if im ovulating and not a relationship and im just randomly horny, ill take care of it and move onnnnn I love that you people don't read. Is the best thing about this platform. You're talking about the men you don't want. Please go back and figure out what this conversation is ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:43 PM
1

A dude who spends his life attacking windmills is the absolute pinnacle of interesting. Why do you think being interesting is some crazy high bar? If that's the type of interesting the BP wants men to be, lol, then I guess you got me there. It's not that difficult to be delusion. Which again, is extremely rare for someone to have NO friends. Being interesting is not difficult. Is it? The country is facing a documented loneliness crisis and you are saying it's rare? Yikes. Because it's funny? I'v…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:41 PM
1

You know that because you like women?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:35 PM
1

I don't know. You may be ugly so a toy is your best option. But most normal women will sleep with that ex, or that guy they are attracted to, given the option. Their best option isn't an inanimate object, to them. They want human connection, not plastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:34 PM
1

I mean, the women you know may be ugly, I don't know. The wand may be their best option. But sure, I won't believe my lying eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:32 PM
1

"Watch what they do, not what they say." This will always be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:31 PM
-4

Yes, yes.. sure. Whatever Reddit meetup group you're in, stay at it. Again, living in the real world, we see what happens when Chad that makes her hot and bothered shows back up. You can do all the virtue signalling you want here, but we all know where the term "🫣 I can't believe I did that" or "🫣 I'm so mad at myself" or "🫣 I usually don't this" comes from.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:30 PM
1

Sure you can. If you can navigate most social situations, you can reasonably consider yourself interesting. Ok. I guess even delusional people can consider themselves interesting. Don Quixote comes to mind. This isn't a math problem, it's social sciences. No one receives a formal declaration of being interesting from their friends. You know it when you see it. You sort of do. People want interesting people around. So if you're not invited to any social circles, your probably not interesting enou…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:26 PM
1

Again, you don't live in the real world and that's ok. You can speak for yourself. As for normal people, we know what they would choose.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:23 PM
1

Reddit is not the real world I see. I'm not going to even begin to dismantle this blue pill fantasy you have to believe an inanimate object with a single purpose, with you alone, replaces the company of another human being. Weird doesn't even begin to describe this thought process. I get if you don't have access to the men you want, yes, probably a sex toy is the next best thing, but seriously, to think a majority of women will pick a vibrator over a guy they are attracted to is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:20 PM
0

If she was serious, she'd know she wanted or didn't want to be in a relationship by date 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:13 PM
1

This honestly makes no sense. Other people decide if you're "interesting". You can't self proclaim yourself an interesting person. How so? Not only being told, but the people who want me in their company as well as the multiple high level decision making seats I'm invited to sit in.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 09:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter