TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jay76 Archive

View 0 posts and 219 comments by jay76 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Fined 800 dingo nuggets, plus court costs and new sunnies.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/17 10:05 AM
35

http://www.news.com.au/sport/sports-life/woman-who-pushed-police-officer-over-at-melbourne-cup-receives-fine/news-story/21a1c450b3a27750d80d0e0ae802495c
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/17 10:03 AM
3

All great points.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 08:17 AM
20

Technically they didn't have to leave, they could've opted for expulsion. Not sure of the difference but obviously shit is fucked up enough that they chose to simply leave. Unfortunately, had they done the latter, I imagine this story would have had a happy ending for them and could claim wrongful dismissal of some sort. Ultimately, still fucked up all round.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 05:30 AM
1

any PERSON man or woman who as a teacher sleeps with a student have commited a disgusting breach of trust. What is is that makes this disgusting? The teacher/student aspect, or the age aspect? Because the former is easily disproven with older teachers and students, and the latter is obviously not an issue in these countries with younger minimum ages. Are you refering to the sanctity of the teacher / student relationship or something like that?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:35 AM
3

That's your reply in the face of a reasonable request for more information? I'm not "all aboard the MRA train" myself, but that was just weird.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:27 AM
3

Even if the research is correct and it reduces the risk of AIDS, why do we want this done to babies without their consent? They aren't going to be having sex until their mid teens and onwards, surely if this is such a good deterrant they can just decide for themselves to have the procedure done? I am deliriously tired, and may have misread, but doesn't that leave everyone happy enough?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:06 PM
19

There's no need to tolerate it. Just make your point better. ie: His/her comment sounds like something based on purely anecdotal observation. Ask him/her to back up the claims in a way that makes them more credible if possible. Any failure to do so would sufficiently discredit the comment. You might get buried under a ton of downvotes, but I think that's going to happen with your current comment anyway. Best to leave something worthwhile in death. Also, in the unlikely case they can back up the …
/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:39 PM
6

I understand you are angry and want to change something for the better. All this is doing is putting a big sign above your head that says "ignore me and all that I say", which I don't think is your goal.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:26 PM
10

While truthman2000 might not be accurate, you're being overly aggressive. (I say this as someone who doesn't identify as a Reddit-MRA, so I'm not jumping to truthman's defence out of any solidarity, just chill out)
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:01 PM
2

Barring any psychological disorders I think it just says that they are doing what they want.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:37 AM
5

As blakrimson has said before me "it's not the what, it's the how". If your primary goal is to simply be right, you can still fail at convincing another person and achieve nothing. If you goal is to convince them, you need to watch the "how" aspect. You probably don't even need to be right, though it helps immensly. Of all the posts I've seen in this sub lately, this is one of the most important messages that /MR could take onboard, and could even be a game-changer. Redditors here usually pays l…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:05 AM
4

While she doesn't recognise herself as having less confidence than the men around her ("I've never been afraid to express my opinions") nor that children are a problem ("We live in an era of flexible working, give and take"), Carnwath does believe it's difficult for women to take that first major step of getting onto the non-executive board itself. It's difficult for everyone. Maybe they meant to write "more difficult"?
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:13 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/z7tya/reddit_my_ex_boyfriend_cheated_on_me_and_is_now/c62869l I was just reading about this girls scenario, where she is being blackmailed into sex. A lot of people there are considering this to be attempted rape, in that he is making aggressive threats in order to gain non-consensual sex. He is attempting to rape her, even though he hasn't physically touched her. I think a lot of people would consider what you are suggesting to actually be rape (or at …
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:49 PM
8

Accused of being gay? That's like accusing me of being a bus driver - who cares? There's an opportunity for the accused to just be mature here. EDIT: Shortened.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 03:31 AM
2

Jesus, I like the cut of your jib! Can we get this sent to Hampikian?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:12 PM
11

I'm in exactly your boat (circumcised, but not angry), my parents were the best and did what they believed was right, even if I wouldn't have chosen it for myself. I could have been born into a far worse situation than what I got. But I won't begrudge anyone who wants to be (productively) angry. The practice is unnecessary and, in some instances, extraordinarily harmful.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:25 AM
2

Who calls someone an asshole for not wanting to have sex with them? Personally I'm more likely to shrink away in embarrassment.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:16 PM
27

Isn't the bigger issue that this type of display is percieved as acceptable behaviour while the opposite isn't? EDIT: NVM, I see you answered that question elsewhere.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:01 PM
1

It almost doesn't matter if it is true or not, just that is entirely plausible. The purpose of the hotline in question is indeed: to deliver a responsive, empowering and effective freephone 24hr National Domestic Violence Helpline Service that gives women, children and their supporters the confidential support and information they need at the time that they need it. Our main aim is to keep women and children safe. The concern about men being ignored is still valid in this scenario, and, if the s…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:50 PM
2

They are referring to people who are supporting a friend through an ordeal, who may not know the correct course of action or how to help.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:47 PM
5

She called the police 9 times and nothing came of it? Wut?
/r/MensRights16/06/12 02:00 AM
1

This is what I was thinking. Once all men are banned, the next biggest killer on the roads will be women, and then what are we going to do?
/r/MensRights13/06/12 08:34 AM
1

She does explain your first point with a bit more clarity in the comments. I can't figure out how to link to the exact comment, but I think it was about 2 hours after you posted this, so no foul.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:38 AM
8

I can understand OP's concerns, so I'm not going to be as harsh, but yes, I think you are otherwise correct.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:09 AM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 02:46 AM
2

Remember that "winning" this argument means getting her to understand she may have been wrong about it, even though she's been told by people she trusts that it's true, and it may cause her to question some of her other beliefs. Also, remember there's no winning against someone you love.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 10:57 AM
4

Her name and address are already known ("Wanetta Gibson", I think he even mention her first name in this interview). It was in another post about this case a few days ago. All it took was a click of the mouse and I was looking at her house in Google Maps.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 06:20 AM
4

I think, in saying this, you are ignoring the women who do take risks and who do work their asses off to be at the top, but who still don't make it because they aren't men. I assume this issue has the possibility of being a lot more complicated that that. I also assume that seeing any quantifiable evidence either way would be very tricky. While we could argue that the lower number of women in these roles could be attributed to what you're saying, could it also a sign that women don't want these …
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:07 AM
2

Nebraska says my ex doesnt have to pay me for the kid that lives with me now, I still have to pay her. How does that craziness work?!?
/r/MensRights27/05/12 03:25 AM
1

Was this is in any way tied to the lower military signups the past few years?
/r/MensRights25/05/12 03:22 PM
2

This is a fantastic article, and probably the most appropriate response to detractors such as Bindel and Co.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:17 PM
3

I don't think that the author is saying that it is sexist. She is making observations about how the social factors that might lead to men gaining better positions in male dominated jobs can carry over to female dominated jobs. She points out how this may have a detrimental effect on womens progress, but that, if true, is just statement of fact isn't it? Are we saying it's sexist because those notions of what makes a manager are untrue? Or is it the fact that she is viewing men as a negative infl…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:17 AM
1

How about telling me which jobs have less suicides? I'd be interested in that!
/r/MensRights19/05/12 03:23 PM
3

Oh great, now it's about "European men sex tourists and African gigolos". Seriously though, have never seen this tool before. Nice to know it exists.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 03:14 PM
1

eg: http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2012/05/16/women-are-better-than-men/
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:47 AM
2

Surely there would be some girls who could've taken that knock. Just not the ones you had to deal with. I think that it comes down to a question of knowing your own personal limits, which these girls obviously did not.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:50 AM
1

Nice! Thanks for taking the time to elaborate, it certainly seems to indicate that the "fewer sets" argument doesn't really hold all that much water. For what it's worth I didn't downvote you.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 12:54 AM
3

Is there any source for this? Coz I keep seeing the "less sets" argument, and this pretty much puts a nail gun to its head and fires repeatedly.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:58 AM
15

I give her kudos for trying, but yeah, you are right. I got the same impression.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:10 PM
1

No need to bust his balls about it - he has been honest. He told her he wants to be a stay at home dad, and she is aware of that fact. Telling her he will break up with her in the future precludes the possibility that one of them may change their minds, and that they could live happily ever after.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 03:12 AM
2

The military has recently criminalized surreptitiously recording a sex act between you and your partner, even for alibi purposes in a 2012 amendment to Article 120 of the UCMJ, so if a Servicemember produces a video, then he will probably receive non-judicial punishment. That was an interesting point. I can totally understand why, but it does seem to remove the possibility of some highly relevant evidence.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 09:04 AM
3

I am. It doesn't bother me but I do think it is unneccesary. My son (if I have any) won't be having it done.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:32 AM
1

They could have an excess of women's-only stock (or any number of other economic reasons that have nothing to do with disenfranchising men). Or maybe they've discovered that females go spend-crazy when the word 'sale' is mentioned. In which case, they are taking advantage of women, not men. I wouldn't read too much into it, you'll go crazy and probably end up making up stuff in your head. Pick your battles.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 07:38 AM
2

I'm not so sure it is as across-the-board as some in here might believe though. It doesn't really have to be across-the-board to instill fear and mistrust. It just has to be a possibility to change the behaviour of everyone who is potentially at risk. One example touted by some women is the notion that all men are potential rapists. Their interactions with men can be heaviliy influenced by this notion, regardless of their actual risk.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 07:32 AM
0

You may be right there. Although if I were to disagree with the other camp I would get the same accusation, so I'm sure how much stock to put in either camps definition of sexist. EDIT: Apologies for the ninja-edit, had hoped to get it in before you replied, but gf's chemistry questions got out of hand. Apologies again, I know it was wrong.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 07:09 AM
0

Hmm, to be honest I've rarely looked at the fairness of my options based on what options were available to the other party. I've always looked at it as "these swimmers are my responsibility, where they end up is up to me". Should I be careless and some go where they shouldn't, I've just seen myself as responsible for that. (Late, and poor form) EDIT: If you are comparing rights between different parties, whose actions will almost always equal different results, I don't think you'll ever get a 'r…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 07:04 AM
1

No? EDIT: I think I see what you are getting at (though please correct me if I am wrong). Do I think men should be allowed to abort their responsibilities in the same way that women can? I used to think the answer was a clear cut 'yes' - what was good for the goose was good for the gander. But these days I'm not sure - when a woman aborts, there is no child to be cared for, but the same isn't true for men. There may be a child that they do not neccesarily want to look after, but there is a child…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 06:29 AM
-2

I was using it as reasoning behind why I consider pregnancy a risk of having sex (and thus why I personally think he is doing the wrong thing by not accepting that risk as part of the package). I know it's not a popular opinion on here, but like you said, he's asking and I'm sharing my opinion as requested.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 05:28 AM
-3

I think I agree. But then, I've always thought of pregnancy as the risk of having sex, regardless of what promises are made by either party, and acted accordingly. I think some guys get caught up in the whole "women can abort, why can't we" issue. It's a good fight to fight, but until it gets resolved, it doesn't mean shit. Tough situation OP, you have my sympathies.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 03:22 PM
2

I'm a dude, but I'd probably feel safer on a floor with no other men too. Where do I go?
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:56 AM
6

It doesn't. Relationships Australia isn't even quoted anywhere in the article, as they haven't been given a chance to respond. "Relationship Australia have been asked for a response by Fathers4Equality. If they respond, it will be posted in this thread. " What is this, OP?
/r/MensRights13/12/11 11:07 AM
34

She's 21. In my opinion, she hasn't lived in the adult world long enough to form an opinion worth analysing. I mean that with no malice - it is a complex issue to understand and people have to get past a lot of ingrained values before they get remotely near the truth. She hasn't had time to do that. The real issue is that she is able to broadcast ill-informed opinions to the entire world.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 04:12 AM
1

I don't see why anyone other than your partner needs to know. And even then, is the procedure reversible? If so, then you are just backing up your expresed interest in not having children by using some form of physical protection, no worse than using an "always-on condom". Switching it off may be more complex, but it can be done. If it is not reversible, then I would say the partner has a right to know that you are physically incapable of having children with them. They may care or they may not …
/r/MensRights03/12/11 03:48 AM
2

This framing of the issue as one of trust ignores the very real fact that the pill isn't 100% guaranteed. For that reason, if you really don't want to be a father, wear a rubber even if she's on (or says she's on) the
/r/MensRights01/12/11 02:41 PM
3

Is there somewhere I can read these amendments? My Google Fu seems to be bordering on piss weak.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 02:27 PM
9

Males complain about not being women? And not getting away with rape? I know lots about your little circus freak show here. I question this.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 06:00 AM
3

I am formulating my list of key performance indicators right now.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 04:02 PM
3

Yeah, was going to say the same thing, although I'm highly torn by it. On the one hand, you could put her actions in the context of being raised (?) in the Quiverfull ideology and come to the conclusion that she probably was doing as best she could. On the other, there are still kids being abused, while her beliefs may have seemingly "forced" her to act a certain way, it doesn't give anyone a free ticket.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 09:01 AM
1

I like what you've said, I would just add that isn't about whether all women are crazy (we know they aren't), it's about how legally vulnerable men are today. It's a bit like that saying "all men are rapists until proven otherwise" that gets touted out by some women. They are talking about their own vulnerability, not that they believe every man is a rapist. Yes, they word it incredibly badly (in an unneccesarily accusatory tone), but I don't think they believe every man is a rapist (although I'…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:25 AM
3

Not to be insensitive, but you have evidence like that? I would love to know how that turned out.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:15 AM
5

Seems that the key points of difference are whether person A considers person B (trans) to be a real <insert new gender here>. Whether someone wants to fuck them or not is just one of many sub-issues related to that. Making it a question of "would you put your dick in it" might bring out the more emotional reposnses, but probably sacrifices some level of reasoned discussion, especially around these parts of Reddit (although this particular post seems to gathering some reasonable responses for no…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 08:08 AM
1

Wait, what? I was betting with you, not against you! Where's my original wager go? Why'd you get some pussy? I've been had!
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:58 AM
1

teefs is suggesting you "let" the child do it, not "force". Not sure what the article proposes.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:48 AM
0

I would place a pretty good wager that many of you who would feel absolutely repealed by the thought of sex with a post-op trans girl have never actually had sex with a post-op trans girl. Errr ... that sounds like a pretty safe bet, here's $1000 dollars!!
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:34 AM
3

The symbolism is up to you. Foreskin fibroblasts are used to grow and cultivate new cells that are then used for a variety of purposes. From the fibroblasts new skin for burn victims can be grown, skin to cover diabetic ulcers ... So foreskins can heal people, just like Jesus.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:16 AM
2

I am against invisibility but I can see why a transperson would want some downtime to ignore that struggle and just have sex and be treated like a woman. I can see why they would want that too. And I can understand their concerns about violence. I don't think that absolves them of being considerate enough to at least let their prospective partner know what they are getting into. The partner might not care. Or they might. It is an unusual enough occurence that many people may not have thought thr…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:48 AM
3

It seems very strange. It feels like they are blinded by outrage, and will not settle for anything less in others, even when there is mostly agreement. I see the same thing happen in other "rights-group" subreddits, as if the tribe mentality seems to take over.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:07 AM
3

You're living your sex life like a blind man and saying that you're better for it. Craziness, man. Sweet mercy, I do not proclaim to be better off circumcised. Where did that come from? This is an infuriating conversation: people seem to think I am advocating for circumcision when I am not. It's little wonder there is so much anger in these discussions when you make up your own fictitious enemies. I'll point you here, where I try to lay out my position as clearly as possble to another person who…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:58 AM
1

Is it from cultural pressure? Or is it from a "damn, my genitals are really clean and easy to look after" attitude? I don't know much about the practise, thus the questions.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 03:04 PM
6

I re-iterate: Do I feel it has had any negative affect on me? Hard to tell objectively, but I'm pretty happy with my life. I am open to the possibility that I have been robbed of something (likely I have), but at the same time, am pointing out that I do not feel all that bad about it, especially when compared to other MR issues. I think this all contributes to answering the OP's question: why do these issues not get the same amount of votes? Let me be clear: I do not think it is ethically or mor…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:58 PM
1

And how do they feel about it?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:36 PM
5

Large numbers don't really mean much in this context. Nerves in the human body number in the many millions (trillions?). There seems to be an attempt to convince me that circumcision is wrong. I don't think it's ethically right, and seems mostly unneccesary, but there are cases where it may be required, and in all honesty I don't believe it has anywhere near the detrimental effects that other MR issues do. In short, I'm simply answering the OPs question.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:31 PM
3

I'd base my judgement on the reasons for doing it and the effect it had on their quality of life. Edit: is clitoral amputation analogous to foreskin removal?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:03 PM
3

Yeah, look I get that. Having been through it myself do I wish I had a choice? Yep, it would have been nice. Do I feel it has had any negative affect on me? Hard to tell objectively, but I'm pretty happy with my life. Do I believe there are more pressing issues that affect the quality of mens lives right now? Absolutely.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:58 AM
9

I'm cut, and while I don't believe it is the right thing to do from an ethical perspective, the actual outcome doesn't bother me at all. Other issues that get raised bother me a whole lot more, so I probably throw more votes in their direction. I certainly don't downvote circumcision posts, although to be honest, I have this vague feeling in my mind that some people are blowing it waaaaay out of proportion. No doubt I will have infuriated someone with that comment.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 05:42 AM
1

Took me awhile to get that. I wish I had spotted it earlier.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 03:19 PM
0

*than. But not only does something like this kill an innocent man, it pretty much stops all attempts to punish the real perp.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 08:20 AM
5

Maybe the cultural sensibilities you mention (men being overly protective of women in this case) are simply reinforced by things like not allowing women into armed combat? In other words, by constantly suggesting women can't be in frontline service we are suggesting that women need protecting? Maybe it needs more than a few years to unravel.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 12:24 PM
3

I'd like to know why you think that as well. My personal research (such as it is) seems to validate what the video says. If it's wrong, and you can provide some substance to your claim, I'd very much like to know about it.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 02:04 AM
1

Quite true, though I would hold them up as a(n unworthy) source of moral leadership to many, many people in the world.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:05 AM
1

It is in the Vatican State (and Italy).
/r/MensRights22/08/11 07:13 AM
1

But, from a rights point of view, if the roles were reversed, you would have the right to walk away from parenthood via adoption with zero legal or long term financial repercussions. If the father were to request and be granted custody in that situation, would she not have to pay support to him? Just an exploratory question, as I have no idea.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 08:58 AM
3

... after the guy said he was willing to help?
/r/MensRights31/03/11 08:55 AM
2

Shit man, you type fast. I still find fault with Oh Shit. He doesn't want to be a father again? Then say so and be very-fucking-clear about it. She may want to continue with the child or she may not, but if he has made it clear that he wants no part of it, that's what she needs to base her decision on. And go it alone if she wants to. He failed to make that clear, and worse, led her to believe he was willing.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 08:48 AM
1

This would cover the situation others are outlining whereby a woman can supposedly simply adopt-out at any time (though I doubt it is that simple). If a woman walks under this proposal, then she owes support to the father (who would still retain his part of the custody). I'm surprised it doesn't work that way now? Note: I'm not from the US.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 08:46 AM
2

He had his chance to relinquish his responsibilities. OP seems to indicate that his decision affected hers (whether that's true or not we can't say). Either way, expecting him to stick to his word is not at all unreasonable, or is it?
/r/MensRights31/03/11 08:41 AM
1

If anyone is wondering, yes, it is Harry Connick Jr's father that they mention.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 02:32 PM
6

I don't know at what point this got confusing, but I absolutely agree. I don't think Kuonji meant that they shouldn't have that choice, rather that the choice should be recognised.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 08:55 AM
2

I don't think this is a "women rights over their body" issue at all. We (crazy politicians and right-wingers aside*) can all agree that what happens to a woman's body is ultimately nobody's business but hers. I think this is a much bigger issue, and one in which focusing on just the woman's bodily rights causes a certain myopia. There is a huge difference between a man leaving his child and a woman having an abortion: When the woman has an abortion, there is no longer a child to support. At the …
/r/MensRights29/03/11 08:49 AM
7

The man can't just say "Oh, well you have the choice to get an abortion to not pay for the kid, I should have the right to say I'm not going to pay for the kid." I like the cut of your jib, but I would still ask "why not?". The child only exists at this point by virtue of the mother's decision, which should be based not on the understanding that the man will be contributing, but rather exactly the opposite.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 08:36 AM
2

Women don't have a right to avoid the consequences of having sex - they have a right not to host another life in their body. This is a bigger issue than a woman's right to her own body, since women also have the right to adopt out the child without the fathers consent, thus absolving them of responsibility of raising a child for 18 or so years. Men do not have this option, nor in many cases, the legal right to prevent it.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 05:24 AM
2

I agree, condoms would have been a smart move, but the situation has moved on to a question of equal rights. If a woman wants to have sex without the risk of having to raise children for the next 18 years, she is fully able to do so, regardless of whether she used contraception or not.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 05:09 AM
10

I can see why it appears that way, but I think people are actually arguing for guys to have the same rights as women do (in most places) to walk away from the pregnancy, and all that it entails. If a woman pursues a pregnancy knowing that the guy does not want to be involved, she should do so with the knowledge that she is commiting herself, and only herself to this effort. That then, is her choice. Of course, things are not always able to be balanced. eg: if she doesn't want to continue the pre…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:55 AM
15

By that logic, it could be argued that once a woman allows herself to be impregnated, she has implicitly agreed to commit to the pregnancy and raising the child, but this isn't always the case either.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:50 AM
6

I agree, sort of. The kid was dumb, and there is responsibility that comes with fucking. However, it seems that many people only want to enforce this responsibility on men. When it comes to women, everyone is in favour of choice. Why the discrepancy?
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:43 AM
1

I, personally, am a definitionist: supporting the rights of words everywhere! Hell yeah, where do sign up?
/r/MensRights24/03/11 01:38 AM
1

to own a dog or a dog-sound-making machine Bordering on comical there, but seriously, this hijacking of terminology ('rape-culture') is simply not warranted. There is no rape 'culture'. There are rapists, but a culture that does not make unless you are referring to the rapists as a group (culture: the attitudes and behavior that are characteristic of a particular social group or organization). It is accepted as wrong by the community in general (always a few weird outliers). Also, posting this i…
/r/MensRights22/03/11 07:17 AM
1

I can't believe you had to answer that.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 05:50 AM
1

It looks like the things we agree on are simply issues that individuals a) have no say over, and b) work against their interests. False rape Equal custody Abuse Situations where individuals have a choice are open to personal opinion. Career choices Wearing dresses Being okay with girlfriends proposing
/r/MensRights19/03/11 05:33 AM
1

It's possible he is referring to marriage often entailing kids. There's a LOT you can't do when you have kids that you can with a serious girlfriend or even a wife (ie: travel with some level of freedom, have adequate time to focus on personal projects).
/r/MensRights19/03/11 05:28 AM
2

The comments at the bottom are fairly reassuring though.
/r/MensRights17/03/11 07:34 AM
1

Right. As long as it's just men doing the risking, it's OK I suppose? I left the gender stuff out, because it's not really applicable if you are talking about the principle of the matter (assuming laws are being applied equally). I was suggesting that the person who stays at home is trading career advancement for some form of security - either the financial security of being married, or alimony. However, I think we are discussing different things, as I may have misunderstood your post above. If …
/r/MensRights17/03/11 07:16 AM
1

I think my girlfriend is awesome, so yes and yes. Why wouldn't I? Is this a trick question?
/r/MensRights17/03/11 06:30 AM
2

If we do that, nobody will ever sacrifice their career during a marriage (man or woman) for fear that they are selling themselves short. eg: two succesful people get married, which one is going to put their career progress on hold while the other moves ahead, with the possibility that they will separate, leaving the sacrificer worse off? Alternatively, equal career sacrifice could be made, though this would require both maternal and paternal leave, which we don't have at the moment. EDIT: I see …
/r/MensRights17/03/11 03:46 AM
4

We don't notice how insane this is because we have been breathing this shit all our lives. I think we all do realise how insane it is, but most people are simply not exposed to the concept. When they are, I think most people have a WTF reaction - and then proceed to do nothing about it as it doesn't affect them.
/r/MensRights17/03/11 03:37 AM
1

They may be present (my post was probably too dismissive of that), but they are so rare in my experience, easily identified and even more easily dealt with that writing an article about it without mentioning those factors seems foolish and counterproductive. If indeed they are numerous, they can only thrive in a situation where men willingly allow themselves to be treated like this. If they have privilege, it is one that feeble men are granting them. Quit complaining, quit enabling (not aimed at…
/r/MensRights16/03/11 01:22 AM
4

You'd think for this to be true, it would have had to have happened to me at least once in my 20 years since puberty, or measured in a different way, with the 20 or so women I have formed meaningful platonic, romantic or semi-romantic relationships with. It hasn't. Maybe I'm just not a nice guy, or maybe not all women are like this. If you are meeting so many women like this that it makes you write a whole article about it, I'd suggest you are looking in the wrong places.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 02:51 PM
1

Like any good Venn diagram, there is an overlap of issues here.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 05:30 AM
2

His own mother is conspiring to take his child away? That's harsh on so many levels.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 06:58 AM
8

You have the right to defend yourself. A wiser man (and woman) might learn how to defuse a verbal fight earlier on.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 07:44 AM
1

I guess I want to see a society in which everyone does everything they can to stop others from doing awful things, and help others do good things. This I am much more certain about.
/r/MensRights24/02/11 07:06 AM
2

On the other hand, we (as men) can take responsibility for our fellows ... We should be emulating men who take a stand to do what's right, and that includes being among those trying to stop other men from being bad. I don't know if I agree with this. Why should I, as a guy, be taking any more 'responsibility' for the behaviour of another man than a woman would? Isn't that what makes young men feel like "rape culture" is somehow more attributable to them than anyone else? As I said, I'm unsure ab…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:36 AM
3

well played.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 08:05 AM
1

I concede that when it comes to child birth women have every right to say that men can't comprehend that pain. I suffer gout attacks (3 in the past 2 years), which is said to be worse than childbirth, though YMMV. I honestly believe I go a little bit insane when I'm in the middle of an attack as a coping mechanism.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 07:30 AM
1

Isn't there a flood of chemicals during childbirth that makes the comparison a bit lame?
/r/MensRights22/02/11 07:23 AM
1

Turgid.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 07:43 AM
1

Question: apart from her say-so, what makes OP the father? Today, I was served papers to show up in court for paternity and possible child support. Are they forcing him to take a paternity test or something? Does he have to take it? I may have missed something.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 05:26 AM
1

below replacement levels. theyre dying out, actually. kinda worrying, the same thing is happening in the west when you leave out immigrant births I seem to remember that the more affluent a nation becomes, the more likely it is that this will happen.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 03:15 AM
1

Upvote just for staying level headed through all that.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 08:29 AM
13

That's a good question. Sometimes I think this subreddit should be called /r/aListOfPerceivedInjusticesAgainstMen
/r/MensRights08/02/11 10:28 AM
1

Yeah, you are probably right. But 'driven' and 'ethical' do have different meanings after all.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 10:24 AM
6

Some driven people pull the short straw and end up poor, but most would see some degree of success. I would think a non-motivated person would have a harder time being remotely successful, unless they won lotto or inherited mucho moola. Also, would the recent woes of the US not be considered unusual?
/r/MensRights08/02/11 10:22 AM
1

God, bring on the artificial uterus already. We need a level playing field.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 06:04 AM
1

Apologies, my post was a bit short and unclear. I was trying to point out that grouping like this might encourage the "back of the bus" mentality as mentioned by Fatalistic. "You're a guy? Get in the other carriage coz you might be a groper."
/r/MensRights24/01/11 01:54 AM
-1

The women only carriage is just a common sense solution. Which unfortunately lumps ALL guys in with the gropers.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 04:02 PM
2

* than. You think these things aren't important until you write something like: I would rather eat hamburgers then grandpa.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 12:49 PM
5

I'd be interested in the stats on that. From what I gather, women in the US outnumber men at higher education. This may not be the case in te lower eductation arena, or indeed, in the UK, but it would be interesting read.
/r/MensRights20/12/10 03:28 AM
3

I hope she never drives or travel in a car - more people die from motor accidents than childbirth every year.
/r/MensRights26/11/10 01:51 AM
1

She's smaller, weaker, I don't think you can make this kind of blanket statement. Maybe on average this is the case, but there are lot of weak guys, and a lot of strong women. Enough, I believe, to make this kind of training dummy a little contentious.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 06:02 AM
1

Was it Portia or Ellen? Portia.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 06:58 AM
1

Might it be worth keeping the text messages from the dad as well? They seem to indicate the presence of a verbal contract. I don't know, I just noticed it wasn'tmentioned in your post.
/r/MensRights17/11/10 07:41 AM
1

Getting a bit ahead of everything, but I hope it goes like this: Crazy woman cost me $2000 but I still won by walking away.
/r/MensRights17/11/10 07:37 AM
2

It is somewhat ironic that half of these kids, who are held up as justification for screwing over these men, will themselves become disposable as they grow into men themselves.
/r/MensRights15/11/10 08:56 AM
1

What are we celebrating about Australia? The fact that we get reports on stuff that happens in the UK?
/r/MensRights15/11/10 08:18 AM
2

Feminism is about gender EQUALITY not superiority. In my experience here on Reddit, you simply can't make that claim any more (as much as I would love to). The stated goals of feminism keep changing depending on who you ask. Also, if what you say is true, then the name is a loaded one, and I do not blame those opposed to the goal of female superiority for approaching it with hesitance.
/r/MensRights14/11/10 02:39 AM
4

I also quite enjoy it.
/r/MensRights09/11/10 04:34 AM
1

So when you see a beautiful young woman dating a much older, possibly less attractive but wealthier man, she isn't necessarily "using him for his money." It's likely she genuinely finds that wealth and power attractive. So, she finds his wealth attractive but isn't planning on using it?
/r/MensRights08/11/10 08:41 AM
2

How did it affect your son's health care and custody? Not being a dick, I'm genuinely interested (and not from the US, if that matters)
/r/MensRights07/11/10 02:41 AM
8

It's really interesting to see what the (presumably) American response to this is. I spent a good portion of my childhood growing up in Malaysia, where we all slept wherever we could find a spot. A situation like this wasn't uncommon as some rooms of the house had beds that could acocmodate 2-4 people. No-one reacted like this thread. I'm not making any suggestions as you what OP should do - it's his kid and I don't know the situation at all. But it's possible a freak-out is not neccesarily in o…
/r/MensRights04/11/10 07:07 AM
0

Err, yes it is racist. That said, I don't think the delineation between being racist and being sensible is always distinct or mutually exclusive so your point still has merit.
/r/MensRights01/11/10 05:45 AM
1

Telling women they have reached parity is like telling an unemployed worker the recession is over. It isn’t true until it feels true. Well fuck, my male "advantage" doesn't feel real to me either.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 02:38 AM
1

I believe they shouldn't, but as far as examining contributing factors - maybe it has something to do with the relative clarity/simplicity that comes with gender divisions, as opposed to the ongoing and increasing blurring of racial lines. eg: I'm half Malay, half Danish - how many categories are you going to need to categorise everyone? PS: We Malanes drive like crazy motherfuckers.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 07:24 AM
9

What's with the quotes around the word 'false'?
/r/MensRights18/10/10 05:52 AM
8

I agree with ztakn, if you are that scared of it (and with legitimate reason) I simply wouldn't do it. You seem to want risk-free sex, which doesn't exist. Claiming it as some sort of right because it is a "major part of life" seems naive. Your other option is a vasectomy, which about as close as you could get to minimising the risk. You can live without sex (I'm sure half of Reddit is evidence of that). It's the antithesis of the Western world, but it can be done.
/r/MensRights05/10/10 07:07 AM
6

And the race.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 03:25 PM
5

I'm cut too, and I agree with this statement. Personally don't think it harms the infant, but also don't believe it is any way neccesary, so I don't see the point.
/r/MensRights16/09/10 08:12 AM
7

I see you've been down-voted for going against the premise of the post. I think I'll join you. I wouldn't be offended. Certainly not in the way that I think is being expected of me.
/r/MensRights13/09/10 10:02 AM
1

I agree. 'Scam' was an innapropriate word in my previous post. People may actually believe they will love someone forever as you stated. Change in life is fine, and yes, people fall out of love for all sorts of reasons. And yes, marriages sometimes SHOULD end. I am inclined to believe that the family should be able to defend its integrity to some degree, and not simply fall apart due to one members wishes. Maybe I am expecting too much of people to refrain from making commitments when they know …
/r/MensRights01/09/10 03:45 AM
0

The whole concept of a lifelong promise to stay together is not natural and a ridiculous fantasy for most people. I agree 100% and it is why I wouldn't get married. You can't pretend to commit to something. Here's my point in a nutshell - if you aren't absolutely sure of your commitment, don't scam someone into believing you are. Yes, this requires some serious soul-searching on your own behalf. And if you do start to go back on your word, I feel they have every right to call you on it.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 01:15 AM
1

Yeah, I see what you are saying, but I didn't mean to imply that it was her ability to stop the divorce that would make him happy. It could be hoped that disrupting the timing of a divorce called in a time of anger or unhappiness might allow someone to reflect on why they are unhappy in that relationship, and how they might alter their attitudes or 'ways of being' so as to benefit more from it. Like a friend stopping you from doing something foolish in the heat of the moment. Of course, they may…
/r/MensRights31/08/10 11:21 AM
3

Being miserable can be as much your own doing as any outside factors. It is rarely the result of random externalities that magically align in just right way so that you become happy. I see so many people who rely on the latter for their happiness and they are often dissapointed with the outcome.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 05:41 AM
2

I agree with kragshot. I don't have a problem with what she was doing, and feel she had every ethical right to do so. She is holding her husband to his word. Ultimately though, success of that depends on how much he values his own word. Yes, there may be any number of legitimate reasons for the divorce to head south, but sometimes holding another person accountable for their actions and commitments can turn things around. Sometimes it can just lead to more misery and pain. Either way, I think sh…
/r/MensRights31/08/10 05:36 AM
2

Insamity isn't downplaying guy's problems. If the problems are more psychological than physiological (which is entirely possible) then he's actually helping clarify the issue. I'm confident you could find at least one circumcised guy in the world who doesn't suffer the issues outlined above.
/r/MensRights27/08/10 07:33 AM
11

Upvoted. Hard. The reality/perception of unfair risk is a deterrent for many men. Is the joy of marriage worth exposing yourself to the risk of life-long financial and emotional ruin endorsed by the courts? Many think no. EDIT: Spelling.
/r/MensRights27/08/10 04:32 AM
1

Would the CIA be the only ones out to silence him? I'm fairly certain there would be some civilians who disagree with what he has done as well.
/r/MensRights21/08/10 04:55 PM
1

Someone with a marketing background needs to talk to the feminist movement about utilising language that best describes what it is they (purport to) do. The term 'feminism' is loaded.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 12:24 PM
7

I somehow managed to not stab her in the groin. Must ... resist ... tempting ... joke ...
/r/MensRights13/08/10 12:13 PM
45

I think I know why she ran away.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 12:53 PM
1

I'm a big advocate of a public education campaign to help the general public realise the difference between being charged and being found guilty.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 02:24 AM
-1

Started rambling on about cars. I quite enjoyed it actually. The eyes glaze over quickly when you start talking brake calipers. The weird thing was, another girl who I actually quite fancied turned out to be a bit of a gearhead herself.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 02:21 AM
1

I think we ALL just learnt a lesson just then. Holy fuck.
/r/MensRights11/08/10 10:43 AM
1

However, most of the feminists we have encountered in our lives are, in fact, like the 'faux' feminists you mention. It's too easy to jump on the bandwagon without fully understanding the issue I think, especially when it is all framed as an issue of oppression. Some of it is, some if it isn't.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 10:19 AM
3

A simple comparison quote should illustrate the point: 1998 BMW 318is for a 20 year old driver. Male: $2519 Female: $2204 I took mine from a West Australian motoring association, who I actually think of quite favourably of in all other regards. http://rac.com.au
/r/MensRights14/07/10 04:34 AM
2

If YOU do not want children then feel free to get a vasectomy and only sleep with women who have no kids. I think the point is that this type of pre-emptive action would still be no defense, since actual biological ties are not a factor in determining responsibility, as carchamp1 illustrates.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 07:36 AM
2

This depends entirely on the situation. If she's gone crazy at someone just for staring at her, he's done the respectable thing by putting crazy in its place. Had he not and walked away, she may feel that such behaviour is okay, in which case, pity the next poor sap. If he was staring at her in a threatening way and she has reacted, he's being a shit-stirring dirt-bag.
/r/MensRights10/07/10 03:45 PM
2

He could have said, "Fuck you bitch," and walked away. As could she. And she stood to gain a lot more from doing so.
/r/MensRights10/07/10 03:37 PM
1

It's hard to see on the low frame-rate vid, but it sort of looks like she takes a swing before he does. I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights10/07/10 03:35 PM
12

I need some clarification. The police were going to lay charges, not the woman they found wandering in the street? What was the basis of this charge? That she's forgetful?
/r/MensRights07/07/10 01:44 AM
1

Thx dood, u r the awesomes!
/r/MensRights06/07/10 12:03 PM
8

I don't have that much of an issue with what they are saying. The title is geared for sensationalism, but their points are sound. If there is a larger discrepancy between students from different socio-economic backgrounds than that based on gender, it makes sense to address that issue first. And 2.3%? When does the discrepancy become a 'solved' issue? When there is absolutely no difference? We could be waiting and worrying for quite a while.
/r/MensRights06/07/10 05:20 AM
2

Can you clarify this statement? Though I think I disagree, I'm interested in hearing out your point. From what I'm reading, you are concerned that "fear of failure" is manifesting itself differently based purely on gender divisions - that is, women are being said to benefit (in some ways) from it, whereas men are said to be crippled by it?
/r/MensRights04/07/10 03:09 PM
3

I agree with nexes300, these aren't mutually exclusive. If anything, one could be seen as the next logical step after the other: Boys fearing failure and loss of face weigh up their options, one of which would be to drop out of the game altogether. When they realise there is no risk to doing so, it only makes that option for feasible or attractive.
/r/MensRights04/07/10 03:06 PM
1

I'm wary of any article that throws around figures of how many women experience sexual molestation and then doesn't take the effort to determine the percentage of men involved. For all we know, it could be an extremely small minority.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 08:29 AM
4

Why doesn't that same logic apply to sperm donors? Why is their anonymity protected? In Australia, it isn't. And now we have no sperm donors, which all makes sense to me.
/r/MensRights27/05/10 11:40 AM
5

Aha! The rapist just happened to leave this signed confession at the crime scene! Case closed! Rape kits are good for this. Unfortunately getting your hands on one can be hard from what I hear.
/r/MensRights14/05/10 05:22 AM
-1

you are clearly someone who would struggle to make an impartial decision OP seems to actually be quite impartial, if his belief in the importance of evidence and due process is anything to go by: Like I said before, I'd help them preserve the evidence and call the police. Whether or not they're telling the truth is not for me to decide, but for the jury. He may not be the best person to confide in if you are after emotional support, which is, and should be, a different thing.
/r/MensRights14/05/10 05:18 AM
6

Holy crap, I think that was probably the most touching thing I've ever read. Other than that, I'm speechless.
/r/MensRights30/04/10 02:31 PM
2

You are correct, I can have an erection without pain and that would go a long way to explaining my indifference. Is the alternative done on purpose or is that just when they botch it?
/r/MensRights21/04/10 03:05 PM
-5

I'm having trouble hearing you over the sound of my almost non-stop ejaculating with my circumcised, or "amputated", penis. Granted I may be missing out on some stimulation, but I certainly don't UNNNGHGH ... why are you still here? EDIT: On re-reading that I sound very dismissive, but I'm just kidding around. Circumcision shouldn't remove his ability to get off through masturbation. Either he's doing it wrong, or Dr Snipdick did.
/r/MensRights21/04/10 02:48 PM
2

I was circumcised due to religious reasons and it doesn't bother me or anyone who has ever seen it, sucked it or fucked the living shit out out of it. That's not a vote for it btw, my point is that it's possible he won't care either. I find some of these Redditors make a big deal out of nothing. The funny thing is, if I place myself in their shoes and assume as many of their values as I can glean from their posts, their arguments make sense. But then I come back to my situation, and they seem to…
/r/MensRights21/04/10 12:45 PM
-14

He could hardly believe how much feeling he had lost and was almost incapable of getting off through masturbation. He's not doing it right.
/r/MensRights21/04/10 12:42 PM
1

That possibly depends on which country you are in.
/r/MensRights12/04/10 10:30 AM
1

I suspect (though readily admit I'm just guessing) that you are reading that extra sentence as implying that the infidelity is male-initiated, but in the context of the article I don't think it does. I read it as men who are concerned about their partners cheating. Feel free to clarify if I misunderstood, I'd like to fully understand what you mean.
/r/MensRights09/04/10 01:39 AM
15

“I just think that women are stronger and coming into themselves and following their own path," That's how I like to think of it when guys cheat too.
/r/MensRights08/04/10 02:02 PM
7

over 30.
/r/MensRights05/04/10 02:43 PM
1

This seems a bit over the top. Maybe men should put in the paperwork now for a guarantee of 40% just in case the future goes super-fem.
/r/MensRights05/04/10 06:57 AM
7

In fairness, according to her rules you have to allow her the chance to prove she didn't rape you. This should be interesting in itself.
/r/MensRights05/04/10 06:43 AM
3

I think I'll sign up to the same course under different names and do it externally. That way I won't have to read as much. This could tip the scales.
/r/MensRights01/04/10 01:49 AM
1

I'm trying to make up for it by going to uni again. Does that count?
/r/MensRights31/03/10 04:23 PM
22

Personal story: my dad was complaining about my mum giving him hassle for not doing anything around the house, even though I often hang out with him and help perform duties around the house (mostly garden stuff). Turns out he did it on the weekends when she's at work, and she never noticed. He started doing it on the days she was home, and making a deal out of it, and she's happy again.
/r/MensRights14/03/10 12:00 PM
3

But when I finally found the ­courage to tell the police what had happened they were brilliant. This is after he had a knife in his chest.
/r/MensRights11/03/10 08:37 AM
1

Godammit, first I can find sunglasses that fit my noggin and now this! Fatheads unite! Please don't block up the doorways.
/r/MensRights11/03/10 04:53 AM
4

Being circumsised, I see no problem with it. That said, I see no point in it either. I think your post would be more meaningful if you stated why you think it's a good option. I am surprised at the description people are using to describe the procedure though. "Sexual assault", "violation of human rights", "genital mutilation" etc. I guess I must be living proof that you can have these things happen to you and not be bothered by it. This is personal opnion only, but these potent words are being …
/r/MensRights25/02/10 05:14 AM
4

Just 1 - mine. It's not ... hard.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 06:46 AM
18

Excuse me chaps, I'm off to uni!
/r/MensRights07/02/10 05:24 AM
3

It's probably, however, not going to be considered offensive.
/r/MensRights17/12/09 01:51 AM
1

For you, giving up a baby/abortion might be a walk in the park; For her it's more personal. Big, long disapproving "booooooo" to you. That's a really terrible assumption for anyone to have (even taking into account the 'might' part). If you can't, the solution is simple, don't cum inside of her. These words are wisdom, but really apply to both parties.
/r/MensRights14/12/09 10:34 AM
2

If you don't want to be subject to a woman's choice to keep it and then have to pay child support, don't screw someone who will screw you over in the future with child support. They often seem to take on the disguise of decent people.
/r/MensRights14/12/09 10:26 AM
5

Man, that sounds awful. You have my respect for doing as right as you possibly could here. Question: why doesn't she want you spending time with your daughter? It seems like a fairly normal thing unless she has some sort of plan to erase you from your little girls life. But why would she want that?
/r/MensRights14/12/09 10:24 AM
3

I learned along time ago, both as a man and as a geek, that caring about what people think about me brings only pain. Simple, true and very important.
/r/MensRights11/12/09 07:09 AM
2

I'm blown away by how little guys read. I'm a fairly avid reader myself, but when I ask my mates about it, they all usually respond with the standard "haven't read since high-school" line. Maybe I missed the man-memo that said it wasn't cool.
/r/MensRights07/12/09 06:24 AM
1

I was assembled from the dead remains of male pornstars of yesteryear.
/r/MensRights04/12/09 03:04 AM
2

As a guy, I wish I had just been born (by non-discerning parents). High school dating is going to be so much easier ...
/r/MensRights03/12/09 09:00 AM
13

More than a quarter-century ago, British feminist philosopher Janet Radcliffe Richards wrote, "No feminist whose concern for women stems from a concern for justice in general can ever legitimately allow her only interest to be the advantage of women." Joyce's article is a stark example of feminism as exclusive concern with women and their perceived advantage, rather than justice or truth. I was very glad to read this.
/r/MensRights24/11/09 08:55 AM
1

Just stay out of vaginas and you'll be fine.
/r/MensRights17/11/09 01:39 PM
1

Goto? You're tits-deep into this programming schtick, aren't you? :D
/r/MensRights13/11/09 05:59 AM
5

Really we should be doing it for any crime where there isn't a manhunt for the suspect One of the arguments put forward by those who oppose these things is as follows: 1) Rapists tend to be serial offenders. 2) Many of them are only convicted because their name goes public during a trial, and other victims come forward. I don't agree with it, I just thought I'd mention it here.
/r/MensRights08/11/09 02:23 AM
1

I suspect she was implying within the context of intimate partner relationships, but worded it (far) too broadly.
/r/MensRights07/11/09 02:28 PM
3

I really should apologise, my comment seems quite smug when I read it back to myself. Really wasn't meant to be.
/r/MensRights03/11/09 01:10 PM
3

I think you'll find that photo is of Nick Freeman, who represented Lewis Linford. Or at least, that's what the caption reads, the filename indicates, and the alt text spells out.
/r/MensRights03/11/09 01:04 PM
3

Where were you when I was asking all those women? +1.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 05:40 AM
5

It is usually considered a sign of distrust by the mother. Almost every woman I have asked has said the same thing (not because I knocked them up, just hypotheticals). If it was a standardised part of registering a child's birth a lot of the problems guys like this face would simply go away.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 05:15 AM
6

The decision to enter into fatherhood, however, needs to be made with the full knowledge of the circumstances. +100 upvotes if I could.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 05:13 AM
1

I start by saying I largely agree with this article. I also think there is a question that would need answering before we adopt this approach outright: if a person's claim of being raped is unprovable and gets dismissed from court, does that automatically make them a liar? I'm assuming another trial would need to be held to prove that they are making an untrue allegation? Because if not, those who have been raped might think twice before making even legitimate claims. (Forgive me if there is alr…
/r/MensRights22/07/09 02:35 PM
8

I agree with your notion of being responsible for your actions, even while drunk. Contrasted to some other cultures, we Westerners (often, though not always) see alcohol as something of a 'get-out-jail-free' card for acting irresponsibly. Getting drunk is of itself a risky behaviour you take on by your own actions. Stand up and be responsible for those actions.
/r/MensRights22/07/09 01:49 PM
3

Women don't think of sex in the same way men do?
/r/MensRights08/07/09 08:27 AM
4

I think the fuss is due to the fact that gender roles are changing. In the past, it was seen as an acceptable deal to do these things, but the deal has changed. Pray they don't change it any further. Also: Hypergamy
/r/MensRights08/07/09 06:40 AM
17

$110,000 per year in payments? That's an awfully good way of putting a bounty on your own head ...
/r/MensRights02/07/09 08:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter