jayjones1994 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Most criminals are men. Majority of corrupt leaders are men. Most terrorist groups are majority men. Women get less time in courts because they are more likely to be mothers or suffer from mental illness. They also do less damage in their crimes. Women domestic abuse? Like throwing something at her partner as opposed to men beating up women.	/r/MensRights	21/09/20 01:59 AM
-1	I'm a man from a third-world patriarchal country and I hate it. In patriarchy, the lower class men still have more rights than the lower class women.	/r/MensRights	21/09/20 01:05 AM
-8	Mens Rights - Turning Point in Public Perception? 61% of U.S. women say ‘feminist’ describes them well; many see feminism as empowering, polarizing https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/07/61-of-u-s-women-say-feminist-describes-them-well-many-see-feminism-as-empowering-polarizing/	/r/MensRights	21/09/20 12:55 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. I quote "Women who sexually assault minors are vastly overrepresented in the U.S. national news circuit compared to men, who represent the vast majority of police case reports" https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/THE-%22ILLUSIVE%22-FEMALE-SEX-OFFENDER%3A-A-QUANTITATIVE-Chiotti/cd8be3a9679e9367d8926868e03169ad6c7a25d2	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 11:51 PM
-5	A solid argument for the legal right to custody that all fathers should be granted. I don't think so. Nurturing, sensitivity, breastfeeding, playing, & comforting are skills that women are better at than men.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 11:40 PM
-6	A solid argument for the legal right to custody that all fathers should be granted. I think mothers are more important than fathers, but fathers should still share custody of the children.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 11:30 PM
-17	If you're a male radical feminist, then you're dedicating your life to degrading your own gender and your own kind. You should be egalitarian, or at most if you still care a lot about female issues, liberal feminist. They are not brainwashed.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 09:47 PM
1	My class was shitting on men like nothing There is no stats that says women offenders are rising. What there is though that statistics which shows Males constituted 79.7% of those arrested for offenses against family and children. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table_66_arrests_suburban_areas_by_sex_2011.xls And crimes have overall decreased as a result of feminization of society. Also, men cant raise children. I want children (both genders) to be taught and raised by women.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 08:12 PM
2	If you're a male radical feminist, then you're dedicating your life to degrading your own gender and your own kind. You should be egalitarian, or at most if you still care a lot about female issues, liberal feminist. Agree to disagree.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 07:57 PM
0	If you're a male radical feminist, then you're dedicating your life to degrading your own gender and your own kind. You should be egalitarian, or at most if you still care a lot about female issues, liberal feminist. Nope, feminism has built a lot. I quote from wikipedia: The feminist movement has effected change in Western society, including women's suffrage; greater access to education; more equitable pay with men; the right to initiate divorce proceedings; the right of women to make individual decisions regarding pregnancy (including access to contraceptives and abortion); and the right to own property. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_effects_on_society#:~:text=The%20feminist%20movement%20has%20eff…	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 07:42 PM
-1	If you're a male radical feminist, then you're dedicating your life to degrading your own gender and your own kind. You should be egalitarian, or at most if you still care a lot about female issues, liberal feminist. Many scholars consider the men's rights movement a backlash or countermovement to feminism. Williams, Rhys H. (1995). "Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources". Yes I'm right. MRA is a counter movement. You want to break down everything feminism has built. The Wikipedia moderators for men's rights is good and fair.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 07:26 PM
-1	If you're a male radical feminist, then you're dedicating your life to degrading your own gender and your own kind. You should be egalitarian, or at most if you still care a lot about female issues, liberal feminist. Everything I said is correct. Wikipedia is highly referenced with the best academic sources, the references are at the bottom. I even posted original source like: Williams, Rhys H. (1995). "Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources". Just face it. MRAs is just a reactioanry movement to feminism. It always has been about countering against women's rights.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 07:16 PM
-4	If you're a male radical feminist, then you're dedicating your life to degrading your own gender and your own kind. You should be egalitarian, or at most if you still care a lot about female issues, liberal feminist. I quote from wikipedia - Many scholars consider the men's rights movement a backlash or countermovement to feminism. Williams, Rhys H. (1995). "Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men's_rights_movement#Relation_to_feminism	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 07:06 PM
-9	If you're a male radical feminist, then you're dedicating your life to degrading your own gender and your own kind. You should be egalitarian, or at most if you still care a lot about female issues, liberal feminist. NOO looool MRA is a reactionary movement. I quote: The League for Men's Rights was founded in 1926 with the goal of "combating all excesses of women's emancipation". In 1927, the Justitia League for Family Law Reform and the Aequitas World's League for the Rights of Men split from the League of Men's Rights. The three men's rights groups opposed women's entry into the labor market and what they saw as the corrosive influence of the women's movement on social and legal institutions. In the 1980s …	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 06:55 PM
-19	If you're a male radical feminist, then you're dedicating your life to degrading your own gender and your own kind. You should be egalitarian, or at most if you still care a lot about female issues, liberal feminist. Women suffer more than men. I think MRAs is a reactionary movement and actually wants to tear down feminism instead of actually helping men.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 06:45 PM
-11	If you're a male radical feminist, then you're dedicating your life to degrading your own gender and your own kind. You should be egalitarian, or at most if you still care a lot about female issues, liberal feminist. Maybe they smpathize with women's causes.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 06:32 PM
1	Build her a table and go to war will ya. Traditional roles that kill men are funny. Oh Excuse-chiarchy where are you when we need you. Canada women's rights I quote: At the beginning of the 20th century, women were denied the right to vote in provincial and federal elections. This began to change in 1916 when women won the right to vote in provincial elections in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta. British Columbia and Ontario granted women the right to vote in 1917. That same year, Canada passed the War-time Elections Act, which gave women in the military and those who had male relatives fighting in World War I the right to vo…	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 05:33 PM
-1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Nope. I quote from wikipedia: "The League for Men's Rights was founded in 1926 with the goal of "combating all excesses of women's emancipation" "In the 1980s and 1990s, men's rights activists opposed societal changes sought by feminists and defended the patriarchal gender order in the family, schools and the workplace" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_rights_movement#History Men's rights have been reactionary movement towards women's rights.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 05:23 PM
1	Build her a table and go to war will ya. Traditional roles that kill men are funny. Oh Excuse-chiarchy where are you when we need you. Your sources are bullshit.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 05:12 PM
1	My class was shitting on men like nothing Actually men are more likely to commit crimes against family. And here are stats on male crimes: 2011 arrest data from the FBI: Males constituted 98.9% of those arrested for forcible rape Males constituted 87.9% of those arrested for robbery Males constituted 85.0% of those arrested for burglary Males constituted 83.0% of those arrested for arson. Males constituted 81.7% of those arrested for vandalism. Males constituted 81.5% of those arrested for motor-vehicle theft. Males constituted 79.7% of…	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 01:30 PM
1	My class was shitting on men like nothing Actually no. Men are more likely to commit crimes against family.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 01:20 PM
-1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Men's rights movement was created as a RESPONSE to feminism. Men didn't even care about any male issues until feminism came. The mens rights movement just copied feminism with their own sense of victimhood.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 02:08 AM
-3	Build her a table and go to war will ya. Traditional roles that kill men are funny. Oh Excuse-chiarchy where are you when we need you. From your own link: An organized movement for wholesale reform in the interest of “sex equality” started at Seneca Falls in the state of New York, in 1848, when a convention of women and men accepted woman’s historic subjection to man as a fact and declared her equality with man to be the goal of their ambitions. The Declaration of Sentiments adopted at that convention asserted without qualification: “The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man tow…	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 01:58 AM
-6	Build her a table and go to war will ya. Traditional roles that kill men are funny. Oh Excuse-chiarchy where are you when we need you. Some of your links come from international men's journal so I'm not buying what you're selling.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 01:47 AM
-2	Build her a table and go to war will ya. Traditional roles that kill men are funny. Oh Excuse-chiarchy where are you when we need you. Women WERE oppressed in history. Generally women were restricted to domestic chores and were not given public office, ability to vote, ability to get a job, not be property of the father and husband etc.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 12:23 AM
1	My class was shitting on men like nothing I think in general women are better than men.	/r/MensRights	20/09/20 12:13 AM
0	Greek contemporaries like Aristotle and Plutarch wrote that Spartan women lived lives of luxury largely off the backs of men On average woman, their social status was still below men in Athens and Rome. Don't be fooled, just because upper class women had it easy, doesn't mean women in general had that.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 11:55 PM
-2	My class was shitting on men like nothing Yeah talk about war but leave out the fact that the worst genocidal leaders were all male ex. Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Pol Pot, Mao Zedong....etc etc.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 11:33 PM
1	My class was shitting on men like nothing No it wouldn't. The world is already ruled by men and it is much worse. We are standoff with countries with nuclear weapons. If it were women leaders around the world, they would have disbanded weapons a long time ago.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 10:15 PM
0	My class was shitting on men like nothing War IS an evolutionary male behavior. Read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_warrior_hypothesis#:~:text=The%20male%20warrior%20hypothesis%20(MWH,between%2Dgroup%20competition%20and%20conflict.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 10:05 PM
1	My class was shitting on men like nothing Actually the gender does matter. Men have higher testosterones and this results in higher risk for engaging in antisocial or criminal behavior. Men also commit more crimes. 2011 arrest data from the FBI Males constituted 98.9% of those arrested for forcible rape Males constituted 87.9% of those arrested for robbery Males constituted 85.0% of those arrested for burglary Males constituted 83.0% of those arrested for arson. Males constituted 81.7% of those arrested for vandalism. Males co…	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 09:54 PM
-1	My class was shitting on men like nothing No they are not. That study about women rulers more often at war was based on female leaders in history not modern times. This is a list of current female leaders around the world. http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/completelist/0,29569,2005455,00.html	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 09:43 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Philip Daileader, Ph.D., College of William & Mary The High Medieval era was a time of tremendous gender discrimination. During this period, women in Europe were treated as an entirely separate group, regardless of their social status. They had numerous legal, religious, and economic challenges, as well as some unique opportunities. https://www.thegreatcoursesdaily.com/the-status-of-women-in-medieval-europe/	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 08:44 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Women WERE oppressed. Some of the rights women were given are only recent. I quote: "1859 - An Upper Canada law allows married women to own property. ... 1909 - The Criminal Code is amended to criminalize the abduction of women. 1912 - The United Farmers of Alberta endorse women's suffrage. 1916 - Manitoba becomes the first province to give women the right to vote and hold provincial office"	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 08:33 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Women in general didn't have rights to own property. Only SOME women did while most women in general didn't. Also I don't like your sources because one of them is from a international men's journal. That's like asking mens rights activists to comment on feminism. Obviously they are not going to be honest. The current MRA movement thrives on false victimhood in order to get back at feminists. You don't think men oppressed women? Everyone knows men did. When you look at the laws of societies in th…	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 07:59 PM
0	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Women in general unable to vote, hold office, get a job, and not being able to own properties is not a form of oppression? Come on dude.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 06:07 PM
-2	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. What material condition of men drive them to rape girls or shootup schools?	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 05:56 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Just read the article and re-read the academic sources.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 02:16 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. LOL what fields did women have that they overpower men? It is highly unlikely and the idea of women on man rape is made up bullshit by MRAs. Men cannot be raped by a woman. What MRAs do is trying to create their own false victimhood agenda in order to compete against feminism. Whereas feminism is legitimate, MRAs on the other hand are dishonest deceiving ideologues.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 03:05 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. I'm saying from a sociological point of view, what lead to the creation of feminism? It was due to the social inequalities, unjust norms and unfair laws against women. If feminism didn't exist, women would still not have the right to vote, get proper education, or even work in a company.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 02:05 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. The Nazis did not think germans have been oppressed by jews. They thought it was because the jews that they lost world war 1 because the jews had conspired with the enemy. Bad economy, antisemitism and german nationalism lead to the creation of Nazis. Patriarchy and social inequality lead to the creation of feminism. While the Nazis were wrong about Jews, feminists were right about their problems which is why it still exists today. Feminists fixed a lot of problem for example property rights, ri…	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 01:54 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism Feminists continued to campaign for the reform of family laws which gave husbands control over their wives. Although by the 20th century coverture had been abolished in the UK and US, in many continental European countries married women still had very few rights. For instance, in France, married women did not receive the right to work without their husband's permission until 1965.[57][58] Feminists have also worked to abolish the "marital exemption" in rape…	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 01:44 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Nazism was created as a result of German nationalism. Feminism was created in response to patriarchy and social inequalities. Don't conflate the two.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 01:34 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Yeah men needing to be in military is a stupid criteria in getting the vote. This is just another example of men screwing each other. Women have lower sexual desire than men. So its not the same thing. A horny man can force his wife into sex and not go to jail in that era. Women are physically weaker than men and cannot force her husband in any way.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 01:24 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Because men had the right to vote before women did. Men had more property rights than women did. Men could get job over women. Men had greater freedom of movement. Men had greater rights to education than women did. Martial rape was not illegal until some time.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 01:14 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. The right to: vote, hold public office, work, earn equal pay, own property, receive education, enter contracts, have equal rights within marriage.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 01:04 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Are you seriously comparing feminists with nazis? That's the stupidest thing I have heard. Feminism was a response to patriarchy. If Patriarchy never existed then neither would feminism. Historically, patriarchy existed which resulted in women as second class citizens. Fighting for women's rights include I quote: the right to bodily integrity and autonomy, to be free from sexual violence, to vote, to hold public office, to enter into legal contracts, to have equal rights in family law, to work, …	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 12:53 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. If women were not oppressed then feminism would never have been founded. The fact that feminism exists, suggests to us that there existed some form of unfair system that favored men over women, that caused women to rebel against men.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 12:43 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Wikipedia IS a credible source since it is heavily moderated to contain academic sources. Look at the bottom reference section.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 12:28 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. If the greatest philosopher is misogynistic, what would you think the average greek man was like? Its just a thought.	/r/MensRights	19/09/20 12:10 AM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Its a fact that testosterone promotes aggressive, risk taking, and often antisocial behavior (crime). It has not been debunked, I cited 4 studies that proved this.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 11:59 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. If women were not oppressed then feminism would never have been founded. The fact that feminism exists, suggests to us that there existed some form of unfair system that favored men over women, that caused women to rebel against men.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 11:49 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Androgens are male hormones. Estrogens are female hormones.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 11:39 PM
0	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. XXXDDDDDD You'e the one with the stupid belief that men can be raped by women.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 11:28 PM
1	Just a question But social rules and written laws were in favor of men.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 11:16 PM
-3	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Testosterone, crime, and misbehavior among 692 male prison inmates https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/019188699400177T Testosterone and ruthless homicide https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223531794_Testosterone_and_ruthless_homicide The Influence of Testosterone on Deviance in Adulthood: Assessing and Explaining the Relationship https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229696150_The_Influence_of_Testosterone_on_Deviance_in_Adulthood_Assessing_and_Explaining_the_Relation…	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 10:22 PM
0	Just a question I agree with the OP. Men had the responsibility to create a civilization that was fair to all but failed. Society is what it is today (western society) because of feminization of society which included liberalism and empathy.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 10:10 PM
-1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. He is not just anybody. He is considered one of the greatest philosopher in western civilization.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 10:00 PM
0	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. It's worldwide dude, not just in the US or Canada. There is no conspiracy to keep women out of jail. Men have 7 TIMES more testosterone as women. High levels of testosterone is linked with aggressive, risk taking, or criminal behavior.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 09:50 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Those powerful women were only recognized as such due to being the wife of someone else important. Women's social status dependent on the men in her life for example her Father or her Husband.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 09:40 PM
-5	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Most murderers are male. According to the Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, when the murderer and the victim are strangers, the murderer is extremely likely to be a male (96 percent of the cases) and is younger than 26 years old in half of the cases. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/wd98_4-dt98_4/p5.html 2011 arrest data from the FBI:[52] Males constituted 98.9% of those arrested for forcible rape Males constituted 87.9% of those arrested for robbery Males constituted 85…	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 09:25 PM
-1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. I quote "English peasant women generally could not hold lands for long, rarely learnt any craft occupation and rarely advanced past the position of assistants, and could not become officials. Peasant women had numerous restrictions placed on their behaviour by their lords" So even peaseant husbands had more rights than peasant wives. I quote from wikpedia: Marxist historian Chris Middleton made these general observations about English peasant women: "A peasant woman's life was, in fact, hemmed i…	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 09:15 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Actually I quote that the "exception" of Sparta. So cities other than sparta ex Athens. Aristotle also said women are inferior. I quote: " Aristotle believed women were inferior to men. For example, in his work Politics (1254b13–14), Aristotle states "as regards the sexes, the male is by nature superior and the female inferior, the male ruler and the female subject".	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 09:04 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. If you want credible information off wikipedia, just make sure the references are good. The references are at the bottom of the page.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 08:54 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. There probably were mines, but most men and women were peasant farmers.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 08:43 PM
1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. I'm sure there was reasons for not wanting to fix it. I tried to change a wikipedia page once and was told they only take full academic reviews as opposed to single studies.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 08:32 PM
0	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Men cannot be raped by women. Get real.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 08:00 PM
-2	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Some women have owned property going back to ancient egypt. NOT ALL women and not all civilizations. Majority of women did not own property and majority of property were transferred from father to husband.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 07:25 PM
-1	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. You should read "The second sex" by Simone De Beauvoir. It discusses the treatment of women throughout history. From wikipedia I quote: ** Beauvoir writes that men oppress women when they seek to perpetuate the family and keep patrimony intact. She compares women's situation in ancient Greece with Rome. In Greece, with exceptions like Sparta where there were no restraints on women's freedom, women were treated almost like slaves. In Rome because men were still the masters, women enjoyed more…	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 07:15 PM
-8	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Except male commit far more crimes and are the majority of criminals.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 03:58 PM
0	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. So basically everything on the wikipedia page is wrong? I call bullshit. I think you are trying to spread propaganda. Quote from psychologytoday - "Even in the so-called enlightened society of ancient Greece — where the concept of democracy supposedly originated — women had no property or political rights and were forbidden to leave their homes after dark. Similarly, in ancient Rome, women unable to take part in social events (except as employed "escort girls"), and they were only allowed to lea…	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 03:47 PM
0	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Historically men and women both worked on farms as peasants.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 03:37 PM
-10	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Men and women were oppressed by MEN. Male commit more crimes, they are more likely to pursue dominance over others, rape is rampant in the military as well as jail. Men are the problem.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 02:14 AM
-4	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. So if women were not oppressed in history, why was one sex dominant over another? Why did men have more rights than women did? Every structure that is male dominated is prone to aggression, rape, inequality, and crime. For instance, male prisons or military And this is why male dominance or hierarchies always lead to oppression & injustice.	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 01:56 AM
-2	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. I think you are doing selective research from your links. You are probably the kind of guy who dismiss evidence as feminist propaganda especially if the historian is female. Rights against sexual violence, rights to vote, to hold public office, to enter into legal contracts, to have equal rights in family law, to work, to fair wages or equal pay, to have reproductive rights, to own property, and to education is relatively new rights for women. You will never change history and your selective res…	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 01:40 AM
-5	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Wikipedia is highly moderated with academic sources. These are examples of the source material they use: Blundell, Sue (1995). Women in ancient Greece, Volume 1995, Part 2. Harvard University Press Smith, Bonnie G (2008). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Women in World History: 4 Volume Se Bardsley, Sandy (1 January 2007). Women's Roles in the Middle Ages. Greenwood Publishing Go read them and find out yourself. Any historian will tell you that living as a woman historically was a disadvantage. In m…	/r/MensRights	18/09/20 12:17 AM
-6	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. Wikipedia - Women in Classical Athens had no legal personhood and were assumed to be part of the oikos headed by the male kyrios. Until marriage, women were under the guardianship of their father or other male relative. Once married, the husband became a woman's kyrios. As women were barred from conducting legal proceedings, the kyrios would do so on their behalf.[ Roman law, similar to Athenian law, was created by men in favor of men.[25] Women had no public voice and no public role, which only…	/r/MensRights	17/09/20 09:58 PM
-6	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. All wikipedia articles are moderated and made sure it links back to scholarly or academic sources. The sources are at the bottom in the references.	/r/MensRights	17/09/20 09:48 PM
6	Contrary to the stereotype, men outwitted women at multitasking. I quote from the study: "Men had more experience in multitasking involving video games while women were more experienced in multitasking involving music, instant messaging, and web surfing"	/r/MensRights	17/09/20 08:45 PM
1	I’m not “anti-feminist”, I just think self-proclaimed “feminists” can do better Feminism exists because there were power imbalances between men and women in history. Yes, women were oppressed and still are oppressed in third world countries.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	17/09/20 08:32 PM
-7	Women could, and did, own property and have rights throughout most of history. The idea that women were "second class citizens" compared to men is a gross mischaracterization, the origins of which have effectively been debunked. I don't buy it. Women WERE historically oppressed, just read this full wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_rights	/r/MensRights	17/09/20 08:22 PM
2	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse I can agree with that.	/r/MensRights	05/04/20 07:16 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse The number of men being handcuffed and drugged by women are not common.	/r/MensRights	05/04/20 06:12 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Teach men about consent.	/r/MensRights	05/04/20 05:58 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse If you call FTP rape, it still wound't be in the same numbers as male rape on females or male on male rapes. In the end of the day, most rapists are men.	/r/MensRights	05/04/20 05:48 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Men on men rape is a bigger issues than FTP.	/r/MensRights	05/04/20 05:38 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse You believe men can get raped by women through force to penetrate through coercian, drugs, or restraint.. but I don't accept that it is true rape because a man can easily overpower a woman. We have two opposite views, lets leave it at that.	/r/MensRights	05/04/20 05:27 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse I'm saying they don't have trauma to begin with. I never heard of a man who has PTSD from a women riding on his privates.	/r/MensRights	05/04/20 05:17 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Population-based research consistently demonstrates greater pain prevalence among women relative to men. For example, large-scale epidemiological studies across multiple geographic regions find that pain is reported more frequently by women than by men https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3690315/	/r/MensRights	04/04/20 05:37 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse I am presenting you with group differences. Women feel greater pain than men. Children feel greater pain than adults.	/r/MensRights	04/04/20 05:27 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Do children feel the same pain an an adult? Or do children experience greater pain?	/r/MensRights	04/04/20 05:17 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Of course men feel pain too, but women's pain is more intense.	/r/MensRights	04/04/20 04:59 PM
1	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Yes it does. Pain is an emotion.	/r/MensRights	04/04/20 04:46 PM
1	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Female victim feel more worse. Females are more emotional and sensitive.	/r/MensRights	04/04/20 04:27 PM
1	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse I'm not a monster.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 09:58 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse No. He experienced suffering but I wouldn't label it as getting raped.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 09:41 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Stop insulting me you idiot. I felt sorry for the guy you linked before. He was no doubt beaten and sexually assaulted...but I wouldn't call that rape.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 09:20 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Sounds like you want to indoctrinate men into believing they have been raped by women instead of being sexually assaulted.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 09:09 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse I don't hate my own gender. I just hate people like you that have an victimhood agenda because of MRA indoctrination. As a man, I'm not oppressed by anybody whether feminists or the government. This idea that FTP is equal to rape is also wrong, as there should be two different classes of sexual assault. No, humans are still animals.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 08:59 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse I am a man. Women DID evolve to cater for children. But they also evolved to collect resources (food) and which is why many women are both mothers and workers. Women evolved to be more emotional than men.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 08:49 PM
1	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Sexuality - men are more sexual than women and more open to sexual experiences Evolution - men evolved to have sex as much as possible because of vast supply of sperm produced in their testes. Emotion - women feel emotions like guilt, shame, disgust more than men.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 08:36 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Females feel worse when raped because of gender differences in sexuality, evolution and emotion.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 08:25 PM
1	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Being forced to penetrate someone (FTP) cases are still a minority. And no, female victims of rape always feel worse.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 07:56 PM
1	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Forced sexual intercourse including both psychological coercion as well as physical force Forced sexual intercourse means penetration by the offender(s). Includes attempted rapes, male as well as female victims, and both heterosexual and same sex rape https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=317	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 07:45 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse The term rape originates from the Latin rapere (supine stem raptum), "to snatch, to grab, to carry off". Modern definition of rape defines as unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 07:34 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse How did you prove me wrong? I already stated why I think TFP is different from getting raped. Different experience and different victimization.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 07:24 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Men get raped by other men. Not women.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 07:14 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Men do not feel the same shame. They don't even consider themselves victims, which is why they don't go to the police. It's easy to spot MRAs trying gain victimhood points..just proves MRA is a reactionary movement to feminism.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 07:04 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Rape is forced penetration. Rape against women has more physical and psychological damage than a man who was forced to penetrate by another woman. It just isn't the same. By saying rape and FTP as the same thing, you are downplaying the effects of real horrible rape that many female victims have suffered. (Both physically and psychologically)	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 05:53 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse I think forced to penetrate (FTP) should be a different category of sexual assault. FTP and rape should be two different things.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 05:33 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse I'm sorry if I am offensive. How did the wife rape him?	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 03:22 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Cases like that are minority.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 01:26 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Women cannot force a man to sex because a man is physically stronger than a woman.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 12:17 AM
-1	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Men are the majority of rapists. Men rape other men, (look at jail). Millions of men can easily overpower any woman. It's not possible for a woman to rape a man. The word rape means to penetrate.	/r/MensRights	03/04/20 12:01 AM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse If men go outside at night, they are more likely to get mugged by another man rather than getting raped. If men go to nightclubs, they are more likely to get rejected by another female rather than being coerced into sex. Most men are stronger than most women which means they are unlikely to be physically forced by another woman.	/r/MensRights	02/04/20 10:41 PM
1	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Yeah I don't believe that women like that is in significant numbers.	/r/MensRights	02/04/20 10:26 PM
1	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Nope. Its a silly conspiracy made up by MRA. The world is not full of dominatrix women who force men into sex...that is a fantasy and myth.	/r/MensRights	02/04/20 09:08 PM
1	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse There are no female rapists that force sex upon men.	/r/MensRights	02/04/20 07:22 PM
-2	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse Yeah right, youre telling me there is a trend of women tying up men and riding on his c***? There is no evidence for that. Remember that men are stronger than women, they wouldn't become overpowered by women they didn't want to have sex with.	/r/MensRights	02/04/20 06:30 PM
0	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse You didn't answer the question.	/r/MensRights	02/04/20 04:43 PM
-1	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse How can a woman overpower a man when men are stronger than women?	/r/MensRights	02/04/20 11:59 AM
-3	Women rape men at similar rates as the reverse How do women physically force men to penetrate them?	/r/MensRights	02/04/20 01:29 AM
31	My thoughts on why I think MGTOW will skyrocket in the 2020s. Basically in the video I give examples of real-world issues and analyze the growing trend in MGTOW channels on YouTube which may lead to MGTOW becoming more mainstream. MGTOW is a minority movement. It's not going anywhere.	/r/MGTOW2	01/04/20 09:48 PM
1	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” Your link is just a blogspot. A blog...spot. Even wikipedia is better.	/r/MensRights	01/04/20 09:37 PM
1	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” That's sounds like a slippery slope.	/r/MensRights	01/04/20 09:19 PM
1	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” There is always gonna be more genuine cases than false cases.	/r/MensRights	01/04/20 08:32 PM
1	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” These are all selective cases. I meant are there a high significant number of false rape accusations in the United States? My guess would be no. Most rape cases are genuine.	/r/MensRights	01/04/20 07:26 PM
1	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” No. Trust me, there is a HUGE oversight. Not anyone can edit it without the moderators banning you, and reversing any changes you made to the wikipage. Wikipedia is highly moderated made sure only scholarly information comes int and non-scholarly information stays out. Yes its cited with scholarly links that are peer reviewed.	/r/MensRights	01/04/20 02:22 AM
1	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” The information on Wikipedia is heavily cited & referenced by scholarly articles .	/r/MensRights	01/04/20 02:11 AM
1	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” This is obviously a non-objective site. Try again with proper scholarly links.	/r/MensRights	01/04/20 01:01 AM
1	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” This is obviously a non-objective site.	/r/MensRights	01/04/20 01:01 AM
1	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” Rape allegations made to police or campus authority are proven false approximately 2% to 10% of the time https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 10:21 PM
1	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” Are false allegations even that high?	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 09:14 PM
1	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Nothing but a conspiracy theory. Don't respond.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 08:49 PM
1	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” Kursat wants to get rid of affirmative action for women. He's just an anti-feminist.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 08:39 PM
1	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? XDDD so when girls score higher marks in reading - you claim the teacher favors girls? But when boys score higher in math - you claim the teacher still favors girls? That doesn't even make sense. Why would you favor a group and still give them low marks?	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 08:29 PM
1	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Thats false. So millions of teachers favor girls all over the world? So do the teachers also favor boys in math? Are girls discriminated against in math? WRONG. Things are as they are. Girls outscore boys in academics even in third world countries. Your theory has no basis in reality.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 08:19 PM
1	Men's rights vs. Feminism No. What we need is a more effective way to catch rapists on campus.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 08:09 PM
1	Men's rights vs. Feminism Feminism is about women's issues. MRM is about reacting to feminism nothing more. Without feminism, MRM wouldn't even exist.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 07:57 PM
1	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? STEM has nothing to do with reading and writing tests. Those are part of the language curriculum.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 07:43 PM
1	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? OR it could be that girls are simply better at reading than boys because of the female advantage in verbal memory. Why women see differently from the way men see? A review of sex differences in cognition and sports- Sex differences in verbal memory Women outperform men in both measures. Interestingly, the female advantage in verbal memory is consistent throughout the life span,59,60 suggesting circulating sex hormone independency. Women generally score higher than men on verbal memory tasks, pos…	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 07:33 PM
1	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? No they didn't. You're saying teacher gives girls better marks? For what reason would they do something like that? Sounds like conspiracy...bold claims require bold evidence. It could just be that girls have higher verbal memory so they do better in language courses that involves reading and writing.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 07:23 PM
1	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Boys score higher in math and science tests while girls score higher in reading and writing tests. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/14616660050200904 There is no bias. Things are as they are.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 07:12 PM
1	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? No you're wrong, as tests exists to measure your ability to learn the material. There is a test or assignment on every chapter within a course.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 06:53 PM
1	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? If you really believe that then you obviously never even been in school. Academic achievement is based on lessons, homework, projects, learning ,studying, and testing. There is no coddling. You have to have discipline in order to achieve high academic grades. Girls are better at discipline, so don't believe the MRA myths.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 06:21 PM
2	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Sex differences in educational achievement are not reliably linked to gender equality. Correlations between achievement and gender equality are inconsistent over time. Girls' overall educational achievement is better than boys' in 70% of studied countries and economic regions. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289614001688	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 05:59 PM
1	Men's rights vs. Feminism Restoration of men's rights...more like patriarchal rights.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 04:43 PM
2	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Grading bias is a myth.	/r/MensRights	31/03/20 04:06 PM
-3	Men's rights vs. Feminism This guy's group Justice for men and boys is just another reactionary group obsessed with hating on feminism.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 11:55 PM
-6	MRA Kursat Pekgoz unveils “structural weaknesses” of feminism in “The Deconstruction of Title IX” Men like him are anti-feminists and just want to further the MRA victimhood agenda. They don't care about issues except if it involves bashing feminism.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 11:44 PM
2	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Not sure.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 11:03 PM
2	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Greater physical activity was associated with higher intelligence scores for women https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23265022/	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 09:12 PM
3	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Men perform significantly better than women in spatial intelligence and complex mathematics. Culture definitely can play role. Women's spatial intelligence can be improved by exposure to spatial activities ex. video games, puzzles, hiking, exercise etc. Complex mathematics can improved by improving spatial ability. Emotional intelligence can be improved by lowering testosterone.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 08:49 PM
3	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Women and men have almost similar levels of verbal intelligence. Men however have lower emotional intelligence because testosterone reduces emotion and social cognition, and it wires the brain for more physical and visualspatial tasks, and less for social-emotional cognition.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 08:38 PM
1	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Yeah, that's the big problem. Lack of interest.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 08:28 PM
-1	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Girls get better grades because they pay more attention in class and are more hardworking. They are not coddled.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 07:43 PM
3	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? A larger amygdala doesn't mean higher emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence is positively correlated with the regional gray matter volume (rGMV) in the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6014059/ The male advantage seems to emerge during adolescence to adulthood. The most likely explanation is that hormones difference meditate IQ differences between men and women. If women exercise to raise their testosterone hormones, it would be interesting …	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 07:29 PM
3	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? The IQ difference is different for different countries. For instance, the US sex. difference in IQ is about 3 points, whereas countries like Romania have no consistent sex differences in IQ. I' will cite you an article on this: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308765268_Sex_Differences_in_Intelligence pg 6 Mankind Quarterly, which presents new results about sex differences in Brazil, Chile, the United States,Sweden, Russia, Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Egypt, Libya, Sudan and Yemen.Most resu…	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 06:26 PM
5	A large UK meta-analyses has found significant sex differences in brain structure (but no significant difference in cognitive tests). Is there any correlation between brain size (and the like) with intelligence? Male brains on average are 10 percent bigger .Also males have only 1-5 points IQ advantage over women. Its not that significant.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 06:16 PM
0	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read How has the educational model been adjusted? Academic grades are still based on lessons, homework, projects, and tests.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 12:37 AM
0	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic or social equality. New research has revealed that girls lead boys in educational achievement in 70% of countries, regardless of levels of national gender equality. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289614001688 There is nothing wrong with spending tax payer money on students.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 12:27 AM
0	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read You do realize that there are many homeless shelters and mental health programs that benefit men? In Canada, we also have boy's reading club in elementary schools. So tax doesn't go to just girls in STEM, it goes to a whole lot of people.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 12:16 AM
0	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read So are you jealous that girls are given STEM programs while boys are not? Tax dollars are paid by everyone regardless of gender - women pay taxes too.	/r/MensRights	30/03/20 12:01 AM
0	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read Women in STEM IS a societal call.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 11:48 PM
1	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read Its an important area to study why some girls are interested in STEM while other girls are not. Whether things like exercise (increasing testosterone) can help change hormonal disposition towards STEM. Or find other ways to motivate girls towards STEM.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 10:50 PM
2	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read Interest is not inherently just biological. We develop interest over things due to our experience with it.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 10:40 PM
0	To what extent are men taken advantage of financially? Children need sensitive and emotional caring especially at younger ages. Only a woman can provide that. Men are for provisioning while women for nurturing.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 10:14 PM
1	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read Some biology may be involved like hormones. But biology changes as environment and experiences changes.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 06:30 PM
-1	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read There is already a societal call for men to enter female dominated fields. For example, nursing: https://theconversation.com/we-need-lots-more-male-nurses-but-progress-can-come-with-bumps-along-the-way-117688	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 06:10 PM
0	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read more women are graduating with STEM degrees than ever before https://www.randstad.ca/employers/workplace-insights/women-in-the-workplace/more-women-are-graduating-with-stem-degrees-than-ever-before/	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 06:00 PM
-2	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read Yes feminists want to decrease the earnings gap. That is one of their goals.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 05:45 PM
0	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read Its about interest. To increase women in STEM, you have to foster their scientific interest & competency at an early age. Like make STEM and mathematics more fun. Train spatial ability and mechanical reasoning. Prepare for science courses in high school. Thats'why the government has invested money in girls only STEM workshops to increase girl's interests and ability. https://mathplus.math.utoronto.ca/home/girlsinstem	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 05:17 PM
-4	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read Yet almost all women believe in gender equality. Most modern women enjoy the fruits of feminism.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 05:07 PM
1	modern feminism is completely sexist Women don't get a way with crimes. For the same crime, men does greater physical damage which is why they get higher penalty. Around the world, men commit 96 percent of violent crimes.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 04:57 PM
-3	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read Paid maternity leave, paid paternity leave, reduce the gender pay gap, increase women in STEM,	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 04:47 PM
-2	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read WHY GENERATION Z IS EMBRACING FEMINISM https://psmag.com/ideas/why-generation-z-is-embracing-feminism	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 04:28 PM
3	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read Forget the draft for both genders. No one should be drafted to war on the basis of corporate interests in other countries.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 04:18 PM
-2	How to destroy modern Feminism - Long read Feminism will only grow.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 04:08 PM
1	modern feminism is completely sexist That doesn't even make sense. How could all peasants fought in war if doing so would mean no one would be working on the fields? Some peasants were recruited for war in addition to professional noble army. Some peasants may have been obligated but I don't think it was all, depends on what the peasants owed to the king. Yeah if you rape and pillage you're a war criminal. And lastly, men are majority of criminals, terrorists, drug lords, pedophilles, and school shooters. Don't forget that.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 03:55 PM
1	If the patriarchy exists, it is for the sole benefit of women inside of a gynocentric society. Any secondary privileges enjoyed by men, or disadvantages seen by women, are simply side-effects of a system primarily engineered for the benefit of women. Patriarchy is an evolutionary basis of male motivation to control female sexuality..	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 02:59 PM
0	Just TakedownMRAs trying to justify terrorism on Twitter...... Video was of Feminists firebombing a crowd (see comments) Most terrorists are men.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 02:49 PM
0	To what extent are men taken advantage of financially? Its working out great. Fathers don't know how to nurture and raise children.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 02:38 PM
-1	modern feminism is completely sexist John Locke and Thomas Payne are more credible.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 02:10 AM
-2	modern feminism is completely sexist Wikipedia's references are at the bottom	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 01:57 AM
1	To what extent are men taken advantage of financially? Women raise children better than men.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 01:27 AM
-1	modern feminism is completely sexist So you basically cannot argue against what I posted? Typical. Do you even acknowledge that male dominated social hierarchies (patriarchy) have oppressed or restricted women throughout history? Some of philosophers definitely think so.	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 01:14 AM
1	modern feminism is completely sexist The philosopher John Locke opposed marital inequality and the mistreatment of women during this time. According to a study published in the American Journal of Social Issues & Humanities, the condition for women during Locke's time were as quote: English women had fewer grounds for divorce than men until 1923 Husbands controlled most of their wives' personal property until the Married Women's Property Act 1870 and Married Women's Property Act 1882 Children were the husband's property Rape was le…	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 01:04 AM
1	modern feminism is completely sexist Is Wikipedia reliable for topics like these?	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 12:54 AM
-1	modern feminism is completely sexist Can you site a credible source that states all this?	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 12:40 AM
2	modern feminism is completely sexist You didn't answer my question. Men raped women during war did they not?	/r/MensRights	29/03/20 12:30 AM
1	modern feminism is completely sexist Men fought in wars but wasnt there also spoils of war> Didn't men go around invading other countries and raping their women? Where was the law in that? Peasants were obligated to fight but don't tell me they didn't partake in the spoils of war.	/r/MensRights	28/03/20 11:54 PM
0	modern feminism is completely sexist Peasants were obligated based on using the King's land. Most of the armies however were made up of nobles. n the earliest Middle Ages, it was the obligation of every noble to respond to the call to battle with his equipment, archers, and infantry campaign and feudal levies fulfilling their feudal obligations, who usually were little more than rabble. there was a large mercenary market in Europe from at least the early 12th century. I would like to see a source that says most armies were made up …	/r/MensRights	28/03/20 11:34 PM
0	modern feminism is completely sexist You're link is just a comment post. Can you give me some evidence from another site or source? Something that is objective. I ran into this site and it says: Women could not own property, control their own money, or sign legal documents. Instead, their husbands, fathers, and brothers were expected to manage these responsibilities. http://www.crusadeforthevote.org/early-republic	/r/MensRights	28/03/20 11:24 PM
2	modern feminism is completely sexist Peasants were obligated. But the professional army were mostly made up of nobels were they not?	/r/MensRights	28/03/20 11:14 PM
2	modern feminism is completely sexist I think they were recruited and not forced. I think the recruitment was based on the promise of spoils of war since the peasants were really poor. I also think most warriors and knights were part of the nobility and not the peasantry.	/r/MensRights	28/03/20 10:49 PM
-1	modern feminism is completely sexist Furthermore the men had to fight in the army. Sure some people wanted to be in the army, but women were never enlisted without consent. I meant even if women had any properties, it automatically went to her husband. I know men were supposed to support wife and children, but it was still unjust for women not to keep what's hers. It was an unfair system.	/r/MensRights	28/03/20 10:38 PM
2	modern feminism is completely sexist I think only nobles and recruits fought in the army. I don't; think it was everyone.	/r/MensRights	28/03/20 10:28 PM
6	modern feminism is completely sexist Women never stayed home. Peasant women were outside in the farms doing farming duties. Most of the property and money were held by the husband.	/r/MensRights	28/03/20 09:48 PM
1	Is gynocentrism a Western disease? Women didn't work at home. Most women were from the peasant class which meant they worked outdoor farms just like their husbands.	/r/MensRights	28/03/20 08:20 PM
1	Woman nearly kills a skating boy and people mostly comment on "great aim", "waste of a plant", and jokes about the marks he left on the ground Bad women exists.	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 11:45 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more Women have agency. But its toward different things. Men have agency towards accomplishing goals while women have higher agency towards forming social relationships and status.	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 10:48 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more True testosterone does drive agency based on studies. But testosterone is also responsible for aggression, apathy, violence, group violence, competition, dishonesty, and many other negative traits. Thats why its important to keep one's T levels in the median range and not high T.	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 08:44 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more From biological point of view, these groups have higher testosterone. Men have 10 times testosterone than women, blacks have higher testosterone than whites, and criminal women have higher testosterone than non-criminal women. Testosterone explains why one group commit more crimes/aggression than other groups.	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 08:29 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more Yeah black men commit proportionately more crimes. So?	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 08:05 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more Men commit more crimes.	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 07:55 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more You're the one living in delusion. Blaming violence and oppression on women while excusing any responsibility on men. My worldview is based on science. Its not based on personal opinions like yours.	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 07:40 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more Women are definitely better than men in empathy, sympathy, compassion, emotion recognition, sharing feeling with others, reading body language etc. Men are better at physical work and mechanical activities.	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 07:30 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5110041/ You're hypocritical because you generalize women but when I generalize about men its somehow essentialism. Empathazing have two parts :cognitive and emotional. Cognitive empathy is the ability to perceive yourself in another person's shoes or position, while emotional empathy is the ability to feel what others are feeling. So yes, there are degrees of empathy starting from low empathy to high empa…	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 07:18 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more You're the one generalizing women remember? You stated Yes, women like "nice" and "peace" as long as they can still maintain a lifestyle built on a foundation of oppression That's gender generalization too. I never claimed men are not good at empathy. Both genders could be good at empathy but women on average are better at it. Its like saying both genders can be physically strong but the average man is more likely to be stronger than the average woman. I go by scientific facts and research.	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 06:58 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more I'm not female nor am I a supremacist. There are differences between male and female even if the sexes are similar. Just like men are better at spatial and mechanical aptitude, women are better at empathizing and social skills. This is not my opinion, but based on the scientific literature. Empathy acts as a protective factor for both males and females from commiting crime. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14695017/ The findings also indicate gender differences in the precursors of prosocial beha…	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 06:41 PM
0	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more Empathy also deters women from committing crime.	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 05:25 PM
0	About us higher population decline Yes.	/r/MensRights	26/03/20 04:02 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more I don't know what you're talking about. You know many protesters and social activists are women right?	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 10:01 PM
2	Accept Men for Who They are, Not for What Others Want Them to Be by Alan Lee Millard You're a troll. Words like superior and inferior are outdated vocabulary. Men and women are more similar/ equal than they are different.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 09:51 PM
1	Accept Men for Who They are, Not for What Others Want Them to Be by Alan Lee Millard Men and women are more similar than you think.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 09:41 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more Most people are ignorant of what goes around the world and which places are getting bombed. I wouldn't say its a female problem. As for the oil, I don't think women know that oil come from invaded country like Iraq. Regardless, I have seen many women partake in protest like against Wall street, against US foreign policy, or for animal welfare. A lot of women are involved in social issues .	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 09:31 PM
0	Why I will always celebrate International Men’s Day To argue against the notion that female rulers wage more wars than male rulers.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 08:42 PM
2	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more Yeah but women is just one factor. There are many other non-woman factors that motivate shooters or terrorists.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 08:26 PM
1	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more Suicide bombers are radicalized by extreme form of religion more so than promise of sexual rewards in the afterlife. Drug trafficking & drug violence has definitely nothing to do with women. Most violence involve male on male violence and often have nothing to do with women. And either way, you can't blame women for the actions of men.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 08:16 PM
-5	Why I will always celebrate International Men’s Day You missed my point. Female rulers went to war under male advisers. William Cecil, was an English statesman, the chief adviser of Queen Elizabeth I for most of her reign . And then following i gave a list of male leaders who committed horrendous acts.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 07:51 PM
-7	Why I will always celebrate International Men’s Day If the queen did not uphold her traditions and family legacy involving conquest & warfare, she could get dethroned by a male rival member of the family.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 07:35 PM
-9	Why I will always celebrate International Men’s Day If she didn't listen to her advisers then she would be dethroned.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 07:25 PM
-16	Why I will always celebrate International Men’s Day Female rulers had male advisers. Meanwhile male rulers like Stalin, Hitler, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Mussolini commited horrible atrocities against millions of people.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 06:44 PM
0	Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any more So shooting up a school or flying into a building is doing so on women's behalf? Come one dude even you know better than that. Most forms of violence have nothing to do with women.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 06:34 PM
0	About us higher population decline Believe what you want, the fact remains that schools are not biased. Schools grade you based on how well you listen to the teacher, complete homework, complete projects, study, and perform on tests.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 06:10 PM
1	About us higher population decline Being a worker is more important than being an inventor. Workers keep the economy & country stable.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 06:00 PM
1	About us higher population decline Schooling prepares you for being a worker not an inventor.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 05:50 PM
1	About us higher population decline No they don't. How does looking good be an advantage to listening properly to the teacher, completing daily homework, studying for tests, and performance on tests? Looks may get you hired but it won't get you higher school grades.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 05:40 PM
1	About us higher population decline Great females - Janet Bannister founder of Kijiji Arianna Huffington founder of huffingtonpost newspaper JK Rowling - author of the Harry Potter series Mary Shelly - author of Frankenstein	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 05:29 PM
1	About us higher population decline I never claimed girls are smart. Girls just work harder which is why they get better academic grades. The quotas are not there to favor students, its there to make the students getting into universities more gender balanced. The teacher don't give better scores because girls are sweet and quiet. Girls simply follow instruction, complete homework, study hard, and ace the tests. (more than boys)	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 05:19 PM
1	About us higher population decline Perhaps your judgement is clouded by your own bias. The study drew from 97 years of 502 effect sizes and 369 samples stemming from the year 1914 to 2011. You can't get better data than that.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 05:02 PM
1	About us higher population decline The educational system is not biased. That's a myth.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 04:37 PM
1	About us higher population decline A 2014 meta-analysis of sex differences in scholastic achievement published in the journal of Psychological Bulletin found females outperformed males in teacher-assigned school marks throughout elementary, junior/middle, high school and at both undergraduate and graduate university level. The meta-analysis, done by researchers Daniel Voyer and Susan D. Voyer from the University of New Brunswick, drew from 97 years of 502 effect sizes and 369 samples stemming from the year 1914 to 2011 https://ww…	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 04:27 PM
1	About us higher population decline Countries in the middle east are patriarchal.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 04:17 PM
1	About us higher population decline It's not. Trust men, that is a myth.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 04:06 PM
1	About us higher population decline Girls perform better even in countries that are patriarchal.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 01:40 PM
1	About us higher population decline I'm not a supremacist. Women just work harder towards academic achievement. They have better discipline.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 01:30 PM
1	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobility	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 02:04 AM
1	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) I don't think peasants fought in wars. I think the men who fought in wars were spearmen, archers and other unmounted soldiers from the Nobel infantry.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 01:58 AM
1	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) I dont think all men were called for battlefield. The men that did go into battle were voluntarily recruited into war and promised the spoils of war (I think it included loot (money) and women). Also peasant women worked in farms alongside her husband but all her properties belonged to him.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 01:51 AM
0	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) Its more than that, it was a form of male dominance hierarchy. Male competing with each other for resources while women are goods rewarded within this hierarchy.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 01:37 AM
1	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) Yeah definitely not blaming any groups today. But still, it's important to learn from a historical & sociological point of view (even psychological) how one group oppressed the other. To simply deny any historical oppression took place is trying to re-write history. That's why Janice Fiamengo is wrong because she stated that no historical oppression took place.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 01:23 AM
2	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) Women were inferior to men in all classes. Their mindset was wrong unless of course you believe in moral relativism. Their mindset was similar to some third world cultures we see today.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 01:13 AM
2	How do Scandinavian and egalitarian countries compare in the gender education and performance scores gap? Not sure.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 12:25 AM
1	Are Women selfless or selfish Empathy, justice, and moral behavior https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4748844/	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 12:14 AM
2	Are Women selfless or selfish Because MRAs just sound like they hate feminism instead of doing something for men.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 12:13 AM
3	Are Women selfless or selfish Women don't like it? Why would a woman's approval be necessary for men to show weakness? It sounds like everything a man should do should be in the context of getting laid. Which shouldn't be the case.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 12:10 AM
1	Are Women selfless or selfish Men do not show vulnerability otherwise their issues would be important in society.	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 12:05 AM
0	Are Women selfless or selfish Majority of men are white knights. You think majority of men should be better off with?	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 12:03 AM
0	Are Women selfless or selfish The reason women give zero fucks is because men do not show vulnerability. That vulnerability needs to be there for women to empathize and care for. It comes down to evolution, women empathize with each other, empathize with the elderly, infants, and children. Within a tribe, women evolved empathy to care for the needs of the vulnerable. That's why in today's age, women go towards profession that requires a degree of care ex. Nurses, doctors, teachers, social workers. etc If men are stoic and un…	/r/MensRights	25/03/20 12:01 AM
1	Are Women selfless or selfish Gender Differences in Moral Sensitivity: A Meta-Analysis https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241727395_Gender_Differences_in_Moral_Sensitivity_A_Meta-Analysis	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 11:56 PM
2	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) No, because its literally too long. Just get to the point.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 11:55 PM
-1	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) Not gonna read this.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 11:51 PM
0	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) Not gonna read this.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 11:51 PM
0	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) Not gonna read this.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 11:51 PM
2	Are Women selfless or selfish Care based morality is based on empathy. Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5110041/ Men and women follow different voices. Men tend to organize social relationships in a hierarchical order and subscribe to a morality of rights. Females value interpersonal connectedness, care, sensitivity, and responsibility to people. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3381683/	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 11:50 PM
1	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) You dont have to be a marxist to recognize the historical and social inequalities that women faced under a male dominated system for 100s to 1000s of years.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 10:33 PM
1	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) I'm just a realist. Read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_rights	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 10:21 PM
-1	About us higher population decline Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289614001688	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 10:16 PM
-3	Janice Fiamengo - "Why We Need Male-Positive Histories" (ICMI19 keynote, Chicago) I disagree with her when she says men historically never oppressed women. Historically they did, but in the modern western world not anymore.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 09:42 PM
2	Is gynocentrism a Western disease? Peasants worked in family farms. But there were also class of merchants who survived through their own businesses.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 09:40 PM
1	Is gynocentrism a Western disease? Gynocentrism was probably a developed cultural practice aimed at protecting women from other men. Probably men from the other tribes.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 09:39 PM
0	Are Women selfless or selfish You should't insult men who treat women nicely by calling them "white knights". White knighting is what got us into to this modern age. Protecting the weak ex. children, women, elderly, has always been characteristic of a stable tribe or civil society.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 09:23 PM
5	Are Women selfless or selfish Women are human. They can be both selfless or selfish depending on the situation.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 09:19 PM
2	Are Women selfless or selfish Gender Differences in Narcissism: A Meta-Analytic Review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25546498/	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 09:14 PM
1	Are Women selfless or selfish Actually a woman's moral is more likely to be based on care-based ideals.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 09:10 PM
1	How do Scandinavian and egalitarian countries compare in the gender education and performance scores gap? I'm not sure.	/r/MensRights	24/03/20 01:54 PM
3	Look at how the tables have turned... Where is the evidence for this?	/r/MGTOW2	23/03/20 10:24 PM
1	In the best interest of the child How about the mother?	/r/MensRights	23/03/20 01:49 AM
1	Anyone else here feel constant male guilt? I'm sure women can survive without men when society collapses.	/r/MensRights	23/03/20 01:42 AM
1	Are men in our society fucked? Blaming everything on feminism is stupid. We have schools nurturing children. That way parents will have more time to work and earn money for the family.	/r/MensRights	23/03/20 12:25 AM
2	How do Scandinavian and egalitarian countries compare in the gender education and performance scores gap? I also read that men and women use different parts of the brain for mental processing. Men use areas of the brain involved in spatial strategy while women use parts of the brain for verbal strategy. Its possible that women's greater verbal strategy gives them better listening span and upper hand in language tasks such as in school work.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 10:39 PM
1	How do Scandinavian and egalitarian countries compare in the gender education and performance scores gap? No problem. Yeah, men have more neurons than women. They also have denser brains. Male brain is a result of evolution (tracking, hunting, exploring, building, tribal wars) etc etc. So men obviously have more neurons in the brain for all those traits. Despite the bigger male brain, men and women perform similarly on IQ tests. The best explanation is women work harder than men in academics. In other areas, men perform better in physical activity and competitive activities, while women have better …	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 10:34 PM
2	How do Scandinavian and egalitarian countries compare in the gender education and performance scores gap? There is no data.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 10:14 PM
2	How do Scandinavian and egalitarian countries compare in the gender education and performance scores gap? A. I don't think so. B, Brain size intelligence correlation is 0.3 or 35 percent. Academic grades is 0.5. or 50 percent. IQ tests are probably higher than that. Neuron connectivity is definitely involved in intelligence. One brain network known as the Frontal-parietal network is heavily involved in intelligence.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 09:13 PM
1	Anyone else here feel constant male guilt? Created Mar 19, 2008 What is your occupation anyway?	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 08:12 PM
2	How do Scandinavian and egalitarian countries compare in the gender education and performance scores gap? In Canada, we had boy's reading club to improve their reading skills. All I know about brain characteristics is that male brain on average is 10 % larger than female brains. That difference probably explains the small IQ advantage (3 points) that men have over women.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 07:45 PM
2	Anyone else here feel constant male guilt? Maternity leave is a good thing. What tycoon or elites are you talking about?	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 06:47 PM
1	Anyone else here feel constant male guilt? Everyone needs to work. Not all corporations are greedy. Many of them give maternity leave. Without work what do you want to do? Birth rate going down means only suitable people will have children, unlike in the past where everyone had children. Europe is not finished. That's just xenophobia.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 06:36 PM
0	How do Scandinavian and egalitarian countries compare in the gender education and performance scores gap? Females are more interested in academia because they enjoy reading and writing. On intelligence tests boys slightly outperform girls by 3 IQ points, which is small or not that significant. Yet girls outperform boys in academic grades. The best explanation is that girls work harder even if they score similarly as boys on an IQ test. Also boys develop slower than girls.That might also be a factor.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 06:26 PM
1	Are men in our society fucked? Women are not forced to work. They have to work to earn money for their family, and so does the husband. One parent is not enough to work.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 06:16 PM
1	Anyone else here feel constant male guilt? Birth rates go down as countries become more developed. It's a natural trend. Immigrants coming to Europe does not mean they are patriarchal. Many of them gladly integrate into European culture.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 06:01 PM
1	Are men in our society fucked? How would a wife have debts if she wasn't allowed to work? Most historians would admit that historical laws and traditions were unfair for women. Even to this day, laws and traditions are still unfair for women in many countries.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 05:51 PM
0	How do Scandinavian and egalitarian countries compare in the gender education and performance scores gap? Well, school grades involving listening to the teacher, completing tasks, completing homework, and doing tests. Its most likely guys are less interested in school work whereas girls are more hardworking.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 05:41 PM
0	Anyone else here feel constant male guilt? The future is female not male. Look at Scandinavia, when women gets rights, society becomes feminized. That's a good thing. A feminized society is better than a patriarchal one.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 05:15 PM
1	Are men in our society fucked? So do you think laws were fair in those days for women?	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 05:04 PM
2	Are Mens Rights activists actually making progress? It's not going to win over the public and become powerful like feminism.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 04:44 PM
1	How do Scandinavian and egalitarian countries compare in the gender education and performance scores gap? Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289614001688	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 04:33 PM
1	Are men in our society fucked? We are not talking about hunter gatherer days. I'm talking about civilization wise, women were the properties of men. They were properties of men in ancient Greece and ancient Rome, and also other places. Men didn't give women rights until very recently.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 04:23 PM
1	A Quick Google Search for "feminists not having kids"... The future is feminine anyway. Most developed countries quickly turns feminine when women get more rights. Look at Norway and Sweden. Feminine countries also have less crime rate.	/r/AntiFeminists	22/03/20 02:05 AM
2	Are men in our society fucked? Hey what goes around comes around. Don't forget that women were properties of men throughout history (first by her father and then her husband). Life wasn't that great for women in the past.	/r/MensRights	22/03/20 01:55 AM