TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jaysi3d Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by jaysi3d on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Interesting take regardless, as she is clearly pointing out that men are regularly treated so sub-par that the smallest act of dignity is elation. Like giving Dobby a sock.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 11:37 AM
5

Who do I call to escalate the situation?
/r/MensRights14/09/19 02:04 AM
5

So why is a jew forcing an infant to be mutilated?
/r/MensRights13/09/19 02:29 PM
8

Gaslighting, because saying “man-up” is sexist. They just try to work around the problem.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:49 AM
0

You have the problem, I am a problem for you because I consider child mutilation to be punished above and beyond punishment for child rapists. This is a problem for you. Literally, logic dictates that cutting off part of somebody is worse than touching them. Logic
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:38 AM
0

They are your problems. They do nothing to me. I’ve ever met who? A is mutually inclusive to B.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:15 AM
0

Again, this is your problem - not mine. It’s literally not a problem in my life. If you want to make it a problem, then making that happen is again: your problem. Who is that? The person is one who refused to testify against the man who fucked him in the ass when he was 8, because it doesn’t hold a candle to savagely mutilating the genitals of children. Logic, I’d like to introduce you to it.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:58 AM
0

That sounds like your problem more than mine. All of this does. You are going to have to empathize if you want to make progress. Be mindful of who you are talking to.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:40 AM
0

By definition it is. You’re right! That must be a new feeling for you! You are forced to acknowledge my existence. My existence sets forth a requirement on your future hereafter. That’s the rest of your story.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:24 AM
0

MGM is literary object rape with knives. You are done here.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:10 AM
0

It is a medical procedure. As deemed by the rapist. It is not a medical procedure and the rapist doesn’t get to declare their actions not rape, regardless of how you feel about it. No, it is not what happens. Which words do you have umbrage with? Hmm?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:08 AM
0

I’m nobodies alt. needle didn’t refuse to testify against the man who RAPED HIM until the man who MUTILATED HIM was in prison. Are you claiming that doctors cannot rape, or can always exonerate themselves from rape by attaching a “medical” label to it, even in cases such as this where it is explicitly not a medical procedure. Parents do not have the qualifications to determine appropriate surgical interventions. Unless all parents have MD’s it’s not up to them when surgery is necessary, and no d…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:48 AM
0

It is a sex act in any case where it is done in regards to the child’s sex life, it is a sex act. It is pedophilia to act in regards to a child’s sexuality. Literally, unless there is a medical necessity for it is child rape. In the majority of cases left, it’s medical malpractice.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:22 AM
1

It quite literally does. Knives don’t penetrate in your delusion.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:54 AM
0

You still lose, regardless of what it is. What is your purpose?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:53 AM
1

I am sorry that you don’t understand, but it literally falls under the terms and is what those words mean. Is Legalese not your first language?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:32 AM
1

You have split so many hairs attempting to make this fallacious argument. You lose dude.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 11:53 PM
1

I have sense; I was molested when I was 8; I refused to testify against the man who molested me until the man who mutilated me was behind bars. It is sexual abuse, child endangerment and object rape. All you are accomplishing is to point out how little sense anybody who appeals to sense has.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 11:51 PM
4

What are we doing about the Snake Handlers putting their children in pens with venomous snakes?
/r/MensRights29/04/19 11:15 AM
8

How did we stop the Aztecs?
/r/MensRights29/04/19 10:22 AM
2

Your framing of this is pretty out there. It suggests to me that you may be interested in them. I can offer only the suggestion that cut men are much less likely to enjoy PIV intercourse. I have know men with difficulties such that they can only be fulfilled by prostate stimulation. This is clearly going to effect their sexual orientation, but not necessarily their romantic orientation.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 04:09 PM
6

You are right, it’s not fingers. As deuterostomes the most accurate equivalent for comparisons to it, as comparable as hands to feet, is the lips and cheeks. I’m happy that my tongue is inside my mouth and not dangling out of a gaping maw where my lips and cheeks were before some child rapist cut them off.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 01:17 AM
1

feel full These words. Did you not read these words.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:29 PM
1

Answer the question. Would you need food if you didn’t have a stomach. It’s clear that you aren’t going to understand much else. You’ve made an idiot of yourself by flailing into an analogy attempting to defend a comment so incredibly stupid that it’s physically painful.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 11:50 AM
5

That’s an even greater waste of time than complaining. The state is illegitimate, it blatantly violates its own constitution in this regard. That entitles it to the same respect and the Crips or the Bloods. They are a gang, not a government.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 11:18 AM
1

You would die from both an overdose of salt and a lack of it. Google Osmosis.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 01:45 AM
1

You seriously have no idea how your own body works. If you had no stomach, would you never be hungry? Literally what you are saying.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 07:23 PM
1

It most certainly does. Without it’s signaling molecules you will over-consume it until it poisons you, never satisfied. Just like circumcision.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 07:17 PM
1

It sounds like you were quite checked out during your sons birth, disinterested even. If somebody was going to cut into my previous child, I would want to know why. If they wanted to cut into his genitals, hell no. Being on autopilot is no excuse.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 04:55 PM
1

Not being able to taste salt is not going to effect how much food you need to eat to feel full.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 04:00 PM
1

I refused to testify against the man who molested me until the man that mutilated me was behind bars. It’s an issue of more significance than child rape, from my own experience with both. There are innumerable arguments that are coherent and well said. It being common sense, which would you prefer, being raped or having your tongue cut off?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:41 AM
1

Cry me a river.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 02:26 AM
1

Reading what you are responding to. I already did.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 02:23 AM
1

Smoking marijuana is illegal federally, in the entire United States.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 02:21 AM
1

Federally, in the entire United States. I already did, try reading.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 02:19 AM
1

Federally, in the United States.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 02:18 AM
1

We aren’t discussing what you are okay with... Circumcision is illegal.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 02:17 AM
1

Circumcision is illegal under multiple statues, including child endangerment, and child sexual assault. It’s not enforced, just as marijuana prohibition. That does not effect the legality of the procedure. Especially considering the supreme court justices recommendation to prosecute FGM cases under state sexual assault laws, which do not contain gender specific language. This is a supreme court justice making the formal statement. It is legally sound that is it illegal.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 02:10 AM
2

Courts throughout the western world recognise parental rights, but these rights are not absolute.8 Parental rights to raise children are qualified by a duty to ensure their health, safety, and wellbeing.9 Parents cannot make decisions that may permanently harm or otherwise impair their healthy development.10,11 If treatment refusal results in a child suffering, parents may be criminally liable.9 Parental rights not absolute: Newmark v Williams 588 A.2d 1108 (Del. 1991), Jacobson v Massachusetts …
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:27 AM
3

Actually that was settled in a court of law. Jehovah’s witnessed, etc are not allowed to deny life saving treatment on account of religious beliefs. It’s simply not.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 09:42 PM
8

It’s really not. The equal protection clause alone requires that the state cannot protect women and fail to protect men. The establishment clause only covers the right to believe, it is not a get out of jail free card. Imagine the Snake Handlers being legally allowed to put their children in pens with deadly snakes. They aren’t allowed to, regardless of their religious beliefs.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 09:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter