TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jaywizzin Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by jaywizzin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah, my girlfriend complains that clothing selection is not that good for certain dress styles at major retail stores. Hard to find stuff for tall and skinny that doesn't expose too much. Can't find long shorts, dresses that fit in all the right places with good length. Etc.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:10 AM
1

It's so considerate of you to make snap judgements about entire groups of people.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:04 AM
-2

Oh god, I hope this is sarcastic.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:02 AM
5

I think I see from this one post why it doesn't work for you.
/r/seduction17/10/13 12:51 AM
-1

Someone, a women can be a rioter too. Saw it during the WTO riots near me.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 04:26 PM
19

Rapists is someone who rapes, but then you look up rape and it gives a "better definition" of someone who forces penetration or whatever. Words do this sometimes I THINK because the "ist" part is a form of the word, not the actual word. Like, you wouldn't look up "rioter" you would look up the word "riot" and under the definition it would have the form of "rioter - singular, one who riots"
/r/MensRights27/09/13 02:01 PM
16

WHOA! Get your fucking logic OUT OF HERE!
/r/MensRights21/09/13 04:08 PM
2

Uh, he could just be wimpering because Trevor is sleeping in his bed and that would definitely suck.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 04:07 PM
0

Or because he's a million and doesn't care that much.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 08:14 PM
3

I agree with Lawtonfogle, but I got to seriously ask. Why would you attach "good sire" to the end of your sentence? It makes it seem like a total joke. Too extreme of a tone "You are my new inspiration for life" ended with two words that make the sentence just seem like you aren't going to actual take his thoughts into true consideration; you are just typing a comment to make yourself feel inspired without any effort or change on your part. Why?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 01:11 AM
1

Still got a fax machine? :D
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:06 AM
4

So, you don't have anything saved that you've read?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 11:38 PM
7

Can you please provide information on The Washington Times being owned by a cult and that the cult makes it a non-credible news source. I want to read what you've read that has made you come to this conclusion. I've never heard this before but I don't normally read The Washington Times.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 10:02 PM
8

You sound fun.
/r/seduction11/02/13 05:07 PM
0

Actually, it has no reason with you posting here. I'm an avid support of equality and men's rights, but you are a straight fucking idiot assuming the poster is a female. You are the type of person holding true discussion of men's rights concerns in the public eye with your fucking retarded assumptions. Three is the neutral choice and the equal choice because poster gave no idea as to their gender and you jump down there throat calling them a women who doesn't understand. You're a total fucking i…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 11:19 PM
-5

I'm choosing 3, you have no proof of the posters gender other than your own extreme bias. Blinded by your extremism.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:20 AM
2

You have got to be kidding me. By your example, terrorism is good because the terrorist are trying to do good by there belief system, nor do they even view it as terrorism when they massacre innocents in some cases. But in the opposite perspective, terrorism is awful because they are massacring innocents based on an extremist belief system.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:19 AM
3

Don't know much do you? Brazil has a functional government, just to name one.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 01:51 AM
-1

Oh trust me, I will.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:55 PM
-1

Look, it's called interpretation, maybe you don't know what that is in your black and white world, but when you say stupid shit like "adults not being their or teaching you, blah blah blah" it's a desperate personal attack to make me feel bad and like an idiot, which I don't and I'm not. Twist it however you want, my stance isn't changing nor is my opinion. I'm glad you aren't doing your stupid batterer classes anymore, you were probably awful at it.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:55 PM
-1

I don't think I'm losing anything, nor am I desperate, I'm just responding to your inane posts. My stance is firm and is not changing. Apparently that's an issue for you and you'd like to suppress foreign opinions.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:53 PM
-1

That's all that's left, I'm honestly surprised you keep responding as I told you my stance and it's not changing. So continue whatever you're trying to accomplish. I'm going for coffee now. You're a champ though!
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:52 PM
-1

Can* And actually, I never down vote. It's pointless in my opinion. EDIT: And all it does is censor stuff, which I am vehemently against. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/vehement Here's the definition since it might be too advanced for you.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:46 PM
-1

Twist the words however you want. Your assumptions are still wrong. But, I guess you can tell so much from simple text over the internet. So, I guess in that sense, you are partially retarded since you can't type properly and your grammar is all over the place. I guess the adults didn't teach you well enough as a kid how to write and type.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:45 PM
-1

I'm actually not angry either, I'm sitting here at 10:40am looking at pictures of cars and doing this, which I wonder why I am even continuing and I guess its because I like your responses. Continue down voting actual discussion, since that's what the voting system is for, right? It's a good thing my opinion doesn't coincide with the law, since I don't go around punching bitches in the mouth anyway, so whatever. I think you can hit a person, whenever you want and feel like if, especially if it's…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:42 PM
-1

Uh-oh, one assumption was wrong, what about your many wrong assumptions about my past and not receiving enough love? Guess you're above that. I told you my opinion, get over it if you don't agree because it's not changing.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:39 PM
-1

Problem is, I don't think or feel I am wrong. I told you my opinion and it obviously makes you pretty mad. Get over it. Not everyone will agree with what you have to say.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:37 PM
-1

I'll edit what I want, you are jumping the gun with all your posts anyway. Go back and read my other edit after your last inane posts. Are you so angry you can't type properly or are you just a 2nd rate paralegal? And I hope you aren't first hand helping the mentally ill, as you are pretty angry yourself.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:33 PM
-1

Blah blah blah, is all I hear. I know what's right and wrong, it's pretty damn easy. And your ridiculous assumptions about my life are just are retarded, but there is that pedestal again. Get off your high horse and come back to reality where everything isn't so black and white. EDIT: By the way, are you sure you practice law of any sort because you sure don't type like it, or are you so angry over my posts that you can't think straight and it's clouding your typing ability?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:28 PM
-1

Focus on one thing all you want, they'll both get their days in the courtroom. I'm glad you probably aren't practicing anymore.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:24 PM
-1

You aren't changing my opinion, I've made my mind up. The punch was deserved. OP is an idiot if he claims he blacked out because that is total bullshit. She shouldn't have reacted like she did to being caught red handed. She shouldn't have stolen his car by forging the title. He shouldn't have threatened to break her heirloom jewelry. OP needs to lawyer up immediately. Also, keep in mind she hasn't told anyone except her lawyer about the punch, apparently she has pictures though. If OP loses his…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:15 PM
0

Hurt feelings? Or emotional abuse? If you're going to call a one time punch abuse, then one time emotional attack like she did is certainly emotional abuse, which the law does take into account.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:56 PM
0

Since you can't read, I'll say it again, the OP said he blacked out during the punch, which I think is totally bullshit. Regardless, she deserved it for her reaction to being caught red handed cheating on him for several months. Even if the genders were switched, the punch was still deserved. A one time punch may be assault in the eyes of the law, but in reality it's different. You can say whatever bullshit you want, the punch was deserved regardless of gender. Now, both parties are massively ch…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:29 PM
2

You can't read though, so that is a problem.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:22 PM
0

Look, you don't set the rules for people. You can do whatever you want.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:21 PM
2

Like you already said and I've said. Both of them are acting like children, and exactly as you say they are going to continue to cause grief to get back to each other. Lawyer up and be done with it, no contact except through their lawyers as they obviously don't get along anymore. I just hope OP doesn't lose his house or car since he has said he had issues with drugs in the past, and being homeless will only open up the possibility of him being a homeless drug addict.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:54 AM
3

Nah, I saw that post, but didn't realize it was your name. It pisses me off too that they let the relationship deteriorate this much to acting like children and I definitely agree they should only contact each other through their lawyers. And I retract what I said about staying together for the sake of the kid, but the custody suit is going to be another huge mess I bet. If she wins the house though too, it's just another spiral downhill for OP who has admitted to having drug issues in the past.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:44 AM
3

Hey, fuckface, maybe you should learn to read all the posts I said OPs argument that he blackout during the punch was bullshit, but you are to busy being blinded by one fact of the whole grand scheme of the situation, so here's a downvote to you fucking idiot because I care so much about you not using the voting system properly. The wife is JUST as wrong as he is for her reaction to him catching her cheating on him for several months. But in your fantasy world you don't factor that in do you? Em…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:25 AM
2

I never said he wasn't guilty, nor did I justify his punching her. But the law doesn't take into account whether or not it was deserved. The whole situation is a mess, and he most definitely fucked himself by punching her. Nor do I buy the black out argument, smells like bullshit from a 1000 miles away. But she deserved it for reacting like that getting caught red handed. No one gets special treatment, regardless of gender, for acting like a prick when you are caught.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:10 AM
5

Ignoring everything except one aspect of the situation? I guess there is no cure for that!
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:04 AM
4

Perfect advice, A+.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 03:02 AM
7

A one time deal is not abuse, especially when it happens after she emotionally abuses him when being caught red-handed having cheated on him for months. Something tells me you are only focusing on the punch, which is not the reality of things. Just because she is a women, does not make her immune to receiving what is owed in some cases. Karma is a bitch.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:59 AM
14

The car is back. And the assault happened before the car was stolen.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:58 AM
4

What about her trying to have the inherited car from his dead parents destroyed by forging the title? And trying to take the inherited house from his dead parents, which was already paid off 3 years before the marriage?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:58 AM
2

Brothers? You don't know him beyond what he's typed on this website. For all we know, everything he wrote was to make us side with him and is far from the truth. What about his history of drugs? I use to be a heroin addict, been clean for a few months, but drugs do horrible things to people regardless of gender if you can't keep control of your finances and habits. Who knows what the relationship was like when he was using drugs a few years ago as he stated in the original post. There is a reaso…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:50 AM
2

The blood no her face, not hand.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:46 AM
8

She cheated on him and emotionally abused him. Is she not in the wrong for that? Then tries to steal his car handed down from his dead parents, not to mention the house handed down from his dead parents 3 years before the actual marriage, which was already paid off before this whole mess.. Just because she is a women does not mean you are not allowed to hit her, and sometimes you need to fight fire with fire. She is not a victim anymore then him, everything went out the window when her adultery …
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:45 AM
16

Oh but don't forget, she cheated on him for months, stole his car and is trying to take the house that he inherited from his parents 3 years before the marriage. Bitch deserved it. And more.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 02:41 AM
4

No, how many? They would certainly be entitled to defend themselves against a drunk mob, no matter the gender, single or mixed. The words "brutal", "attacking", and the phrase "poor, defenseless drunk girls." are assuming the police have to baton them all into submission or use their guns; this is definitely not true.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 11:37 PM
2

This post is EXACTLY why the accused should be left anonymous just as much as the accuser until proven guilty. Did you fucking forget that the fundamental part of the U.S. judicial system is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. Seriously, fuck you. I wouldn't hire anyone with such extremist views, ever.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 11:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter