| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Do men find straightforward and assertive women seductive?Right? It's like a textbook example of group communication disintegration. In fact I wondered if you were doing some sort of study. Hope you got something out of it, even if not an actual answer to your question. In a sense maybe you did, like people (esp men?) are mostly into their internal monologues instead of whatever you have to say | /r/seduction | 18/06/23 10:16 AM |
| 2 | Do men find straightforward and assertive women seductive?Amazing and unfortunate that this simple post with its reasonable and well articulated question somehow triggered a long thread of completely irrelevant and unresponsive replies, rambling about the responders' own issues, experiences, and sentiments, and of course arguing with each other | /r/seduction | 15/06/23 05:50 AM |
| 1 | Do men find straightforward and assertive women seductive?But (unless it was added later in an edit) the post specified "respectful and soft-spoken" | /r/seduction | 15/06/23 05:31 AM |
| 4 | Does anyone know guys who insult women after they reject them?tldr: You're playing chess, and the guys you're talking about are playing checkers. | /r/seduction | 21/07/22 06:04 AM |
| 16 | Does anyone know guys who insult women after they reject them?Your pronouns are ambiguous and I first thought you meant the men had rejected the women, but I figured it out. It's not logic, it's emotion: They need to devalue what they cannot have. As for surely being aware of the consequences, you'd be amazed what men can be unaware of. | /r/seduction | 21/07/22 06:00 AM |
| 1 | [deleted by user]Oh sure. you want that regular, or extra nerdy? I'm finishing up a couple of conversations in r/investing and winning a friendly argument with someone here in the cock size thread just now. Let me know what you're using that's doing the autoconfuse (iphone/android? what app? pc/mac? what browser or program?) and I'll get back to you. If that question is incomprehensible, tell me that too. | /r/seduction | 28/01/22 07:13 AM |
| 1 | [deleted by user]Desirable characteristics surely provide more opportunities for reproduction, which is optimal from POV of the DNA, right? It's sort of what "desirable" means. Also, what I said last message about human penises being larger than necessary for reproduction, which suggests either decorative value or enhanced pleasure for the female, or both. Your assertion that this would necessarily result in a scenario of endlessly and infinitely longer penises seems to me to be a straw man, so to speak. | /r/seduction | 28/01/22 06:39 AM |
| 1 | [deleted by user]yeah, there are ways to make autoconfuse behave properly; it depends on platform and application. Let me know if you want to go full geek on this and I can have it eating out of your hand, purring like a kitten | /r/seduction | 28/01/22 02:39 AM |
| 1 | [deleted by user]Not trying to be an asshole here, genuinely interested. Regarding the longer average, I believe human penises are much larger than those of similar primates and similar sizes (who manage to reproduce just fine, since their species survive), so for whatever reason we seem to have developed with larger penises than the demands of mere reproduction would seem to require. As for desirable features not "making for optimal reproduction," I'd suggest you tell this to a peacock. In almost every sexually… | /r/seduction | 27/01/22 09:28 AM |
| 1 | [deleted by user]And yet larger penises are usually considered just that, so why wouldn't they be selected for, just as so many other traits are, like height, material success, aggression, etc? I also wonder (because I don't know) about whether longer penises are more likely to inseminate successfully because they get closer to the target thus giving sperm cells a head start, but it seems intuitively likely. At least the way I learned it, humans are especially sexual: for instance fertile and receptive almost al… | /r/seduction | 26/01/22 10:45 PM |
| 2 | [deleted by user]NO PLUCK YOU HUMAN | /r/seduction | 26/01/22 10:29 PM |
| 1 | [deleted by user]Thanks for all these acronyms! I love the dedication people have on details. There's so many little worlds of special interest, collectors, experts, whatever, in every imaginable part of life. | /r/seduction | 26/01/22 10:25 PM |
| 1 | [deleted by user]Yes! And traits like altruism in males apparently are selected for too, which seems both sophisticated and encouraging. | /r/seduction | 26/01/22 09:59 PM |
| 1 | [deleted by user]Gotta wonder context--is this your first conversation with her or are you guys already friends or at least been talking for a while? It's weird if you're just starting to talk. Ask her about her tits in detail. I dunno. Fairly unusual behavior for a woman really. | /r/seduction | 26/01/22 09:28 PM |
| 2 | [deleted by user]and they cannot lie! | /r/seduction | 26/01/22 09:19 PM |
| 3 | [deleted by user]Everybody's above average! We like grading on a generous bell curve. | /r/seduction | 26/01/22 09:17 PM |
| 4 | [deleted by user]Most women do like big hard dicks, though diff women have diff priorities and place diff importance on that factor (almost always, men care MUCH more about dick size, and gay men more than anybody). Of course the women who have sex with you like big dicks (assuming you fit that description). They're a self-selected subpopulation. Like, a fat dude will find that the women he has sex with tend to like fat guys, but he'd be wrong to conclude that most women prefer fat guys. | /r/seduction | 26/01/22 09:13 PM |
| 1 | [deleted by user]Preferring big ducks! That's a complicating factor, probably a whole diff conversation | /r/seduction | 26/01/22 08:36 PM |
| 6 | [deleted by user]Sure, average is average. But why is the average what it is? Six inches vs 2 or 14? There's no role for natural selection there? | /r/seduction | 26/01/22 08:32 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter