jcmefra Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-1	In men, higher wages predicted a higher proportion of being married, whereas in women higher wages were associated with a lower proportion of being married. My bad, what I tried to say is that the spurious correlation is not in the paper itself but in the interpretation made by most of the people here. In this specific research the author is very clear when he says "Although our results are consistent with the hypothesis that there is selection pressure for rather recently arising traits as education and income, on the basis of our results we are not able to draw any final conclusion on selection."	/r/BlackPillScience	24/08/21 03:40 AM
1	In men, higher wages predicted a higher proportion of being married, whereas in women higher wages were associated with a lower proportion of being married. I can just argue against every single paper and research here since is pretty full of spurious correlations and it's ignoring a lot of sociology and neuroscience basis (Im the best of the cases, it's using very out to dated basis). I just don't want to do it because it makes no sense, I'm not in my job or something. I'm just making fun of this.	/r/BlackPillScience	21/08/21 11:27 PM
1	In men, higher wages predicted a higher proportion of being married, whereas in women higher wages were associated with a lower proportion of being married. Potential on growing yourself without needing the approval of women maybe?	/r/BlackPillScience	16/08/21 05:17 PM
1	In men, higher wages predicted a higher proportion of being married, whereas in women higher wages were associated with a lower proportion of being married. Yep but that doesn't means auto criticism, you can have shit genes and still be an awesome person, or you can have shit genes and spend your life studying why the others don't like you because they are "biologically predisposed" to do so instead of spending that time in trying to reach your potential.	/r/BlackPillScience	16/08/21 04:22 PM
1	In men, higher wages predicted a higher proportion of being married, whereas in women higher wages were associated with a lower proportion of being married. Well that's nice, then you are not into those who I mention. Most of blackpillers in this subreddit are pretty... Let's say they they are unable to criticize themselves and just try to blame the others (women, other men, society...), and that's not the point.	/r/BlackPillScience	16/08/21 04:14 PM
1	In men, higher wages predicted a higher proportion of being married, whereas in women higher wages were associated with a lower proportion of being married. So ye call me bluepilled if that means "normal person"	/r/BlackPillScience	16/08/21 12:20 AM
1	In men, higher wages predicted a higher proportion of being married, whereas in women higher wages were associated with a lower proportion of being married. Is not that hard to argue against those studies, I mean, according to my point of view as a psychologist it's pretty easy to identify some patterns and find the only truth = you guys can research whatever you want and intepret the studies however you want, but that won't be ever enough to fill that void caused by the inability to accept those unconscious toxic behaviors you have with yourselves and with your near ones.	/r/BlackPillScience	16/08/21 12:20 AM
-2	In men, higher wages predicted a higher proportion of being married, whereas in women higher wages were associated with a lower proportion of being married. Actually is so sad how someones dedicate their lives studying and searching for studies to justify why they are not attractive for women	/r/BlackPillScience	14/08/21 07:36 PM