~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Your typical double standardsthere is absolutely no problem with "being female online" and i never implied that. i will admit though that i was too quick to judge (influenced by the invalid point of the picture and the framing of the screenshots, etc.) and that these people are actually just "a bitch" and "a random woman on twitter." | /r/MensRights | 31/05/17 12:07 AM |
| 1 | Your typical double standardsI don't think my expectation is part of this problem at all. two people who don't know each other can be absolutely expected to agree with each other's opinion based on observed behavior; the fact that they're strangers is completely unrelated. if two people like soccer, they might be "literal strangers" and it wouldn't be unreasonable at all to say they both think cristiano and messi are good players. pointing out the irony in people that would supposedly advocate for equality is not "someone s… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/17 08:18 PM |
| 3 | Women being kept out of STEM field because of societal pressure?it does imply "reduced agency," or whatever you want to call it, because that is exactly just doing what they think others want them to do means | /r/MensRights | 26/05/17 03:14 PM |
| 5 | Women being kept out of STEM field because of societal pressure?If that were true, then a lot of the claimed "oppression" would actually be justified...however it's not. absolutely | /r/MensRights | 26/05/17 03:20 AM |
| 0 | Your typical double standardsbreaking news: two different individuals have two specific opinions, which are not exclusive of each other, in a way that one of the individuals could be very reasonably expected to support the other's opinion. idiot voluntarily present on a personally disliked subreddit is shocked. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/17 03:17 AM |
| 1 | Why am I censored when I ask why people think that women are worse off when it's clearly not true (in wealthy nations)?it's not necessarily that quora itself is feminist, but more that (like "progressive" universities and popular media outlets) it avoids undesirable situations with the party that has the most contagious or loudest reach. in other words, it's in quora's best interest to not offend the feminist community, because it has a bigger influence on public opinion and moral standards. it doesn't necessarily imply the company's ideology, but is in my opinion still clearly reproachable. | /r/MensRights | 26/05/17 03:05 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter