TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jdgoerzen Archive

View 2 posts and 40 comments by jdgoerzen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Same thing happened to me too, but one person complained. My date. I tried to just ignore it and go on, but she was pretty adamant about it being wrong.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 06:47 PM
23

Came here to say. We need to remember to respect both sides of an issue.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 03:21 AM
1

Not graffiti. It's part of the sign.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:21 AM
1

It's not about classism, in Canada you go to a "college" for a different thing than if you were to go to a "university". You can't get a full degree in a college, just a diploma or certification. It's like trade schools except there are also polytechnics which have full degrees. All that OP is saying is that the term "College" in Canada doesn't mean the same thing as in America. Edit: which is useful information for the Americans that are misunderstanding him.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 07:39 AM
1

I've only ever been on one date, and on that date an exceedingly drunk woman came up to me from behind and slapped my ass. I felt like I had to defend her when my date said that was a shitty thing for her to have done. I just felt really uncomfortable and wished it never happened at all. I guess I'm not that surprised I didn't get a second date, looking back on it.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 07:20 AM
4

That's pushing it a bit far. I don't like the sound of assumptions when it comes to child abuse.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 09:23 AM
-3

I don't think responding to an offensive shirt with an offensive shirt is a cool thing to do.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:42 PM
2

They're not affiliated. In Canada there's just Banana Republic and the Gap.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:55 PM
0

I'd just be offended. Violence is never right. Slut shaming is never right.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:53 PM
1

Yeah it is rough for someone with suicidal depression and severe social anxiety. You're right.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:43 PM
1

Probably not.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:41 PM
1

That just makes you a person who refuses to be a terrorist. I'm okay with that.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:41 PM
2

I'm just the standard retail employee. It's a good job for the most part. I'm not being paid minimum wage, the people are great for the most part, even the customers are great. Comparing this to any other job I've had, it's probably the easiest on my physical problems and on my emotional ones.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:39 PM
2

No. Especially so. How much would that hurt if your own kid craps on your day? That would absolutely suck so hard.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:29 PM
7

Absolutely not. I don't advocate violence even jokingly.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:27 PM
1

I think it's supposed to be a present from the child.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 08:02 AM
3

They already know. I've actually discussed similar products with my coworkers, even my managers. The slogans on some of the shirts are just silly.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 08:00 AM
9

Not just yet.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:59 AM
23

No.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 05:35 AM
2

I hope that's the idea.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 05:27 AM
0

That would be nice.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 05:26 AM
2

I agree, that is a ridiculous concept.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 02:40 AM
-8

Your example is confusing and a little bit exaggerated. I was trying to say that having sources that are impartial is an essential part of any discussion. I don't claim that the source's results are biased, but that the source is biased. Frustratingly, any men's rights study done by a men's rights group are, by definition, conflicted in interests. And there aren't many people who will publish information that benefits men's rights if they themselves aren't men's rights activists or egalitarians.…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 02:36 AM
14

I don't think they were trying to be sarcastic, sadly. Old Navy is very much oriented to women.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 02:09 AM
-6

Sometimes I want to leave all this hate-mongering, but I'm here to try and give what support I can for discussions about serious issues like male rape, lack of choice in children's custody and t-shirts that crap on a celebration of the positive male role models in your life. The angry users on this sub just make our arguments seem less valid. I've got a rule of thumb that says that the first person to get angry in an argument is the loser. The person who discusses their point with unbiased infor…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 12:10 AM
-5

I wish you weren't so downvoted for just stating that a source is impartial. That's an essential part of any discussion. But yeah the article's main point is true. The shirt is crap. It's worse than crap. It's someone crapping on your father's day present and shoving the present in your face, all the while expecting you to love your present.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 11:31 PM
48

I work for Old Navy up in Canada. I feel embarrassed and ashamed now.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 11:24 PM
1

Came here to say.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 03:03 AM
0

Your first paragraph doesn't address anything I said in my previous comment in this thread. You aren't defending the fact that wanting her raped is a bad thing. You're simply saying that she gave you reason to want it. Saying you want her raped is a terrible thing to say whether it was provoked or not. That last paragraph is just you throwing feminist hate at me. first of all, it has no bearing on how bad a rape threat is. Secondly, that's an entirely opinionated matter, and you can't argue that…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 12:20 AM
0

First of all, you're just making her look bad. You are in no way trying to defend yourself from saying that you want her raped. That's the issue at hand in this thread. Not how bad she is. Trying to change the subject to that is the same as saying you have no way of defending against this. 1) prove that she made up the story. I doubt you can. Prove that she did it in order to provoke men. I doubt that you can. 2) So your facts are as follows: a) DPRJones says that he worked with her at 2:30am b)…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 12:09 AM
0

Burden of proof rests on the accuser. Yes. I didn't claim that she was right, merely that I was open to listen to what she has to say. He can't just say that she hasn't received rape threats, and is just provoking men, without proving that, just as much as she can't claim she received rape threats without proving it. However, I'd prefer to support someone who claims they are facing adversity until they have been disproven one way or the other.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 11:29 PM
2

And I'm sorry, if it sounded like I was trying to accuse you, I was mostly just wondering, but I was at the same time fighting another redditor below.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 11:02 PM
2

Thanks, I specifically avoided trying to make any more opinions about it specifically because I know I haven't looked far enough into it to say anything more. And yeah, I wasn't trying to accuse him of an insult, just wondering, but I had just been in the thick of the flamewar, so It came out just wrong.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 11:01 PM
1

I'm not sure what you mean by this, but if it was an insult, you'd do better in trying to correct me, rather than just make fun of me.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 01:10 PM
1

"He" is gthnk. I was responding to you.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 01:03 PM
0

This isn't the issue at hand, and you're using terribly faulty logic. He's the one who hopes she gets raped, therefor he hopes that she gets raped by his standards, not "Jaclyn Friedman"'s whomever she may be and however wrong she may be. Therefor, I can only assume that he hopes that she is forced to have completely non-consensual sex. Possibly by way of being drugged, or being forced at the threat of death. You're trying to defend his opinion that a woman should get raped? Or are you just maki…
/r/MensRights23/11/13 12:56 PM
0

The first comment he made was "Dear Muslima, Stop whining, will you. Yes, yes, I know you had your genitals mutilated with a razor blade, and . . . yawn . . . don't tell me yet again, I know you aren't allowed to drive a car, and you can't leave the house without a male relative, and your husband is allowed to beat you, and you'll be stoned to death if you commit adultery. But stop whining, will you. Think of the suffering your poor American sisters have to put up with. Only this week I heard of…
/r/MensRights23/11/13 12:37 PM
0

No. You cannot just say she's a bad person as if that could possibly excuse you from the fact that you said that she DESERVES TO GET RAPED. That is disgusting, and trying to shift the blame on to her is even worse. Second, That video is fairly implicating, but there are significant discrepancies between the stories, so I don't know if you're right or wrong about that.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 11:53 AM
-1

You just made something of a rape threat yourself, therefor, issue. Watson boycotted Dawkins cause he personally defamed her, whether he was right or wrong is neither here nor there. I'd boycott Stephen Hawking, if he decided to insult me, whether he was right or wrong. Once again, I don't know what she's done on skepticism or atheism. If there is nothing good, I will determine that for myself. If it's all boiled down to man-hate (and due to the fact that she has given talks at various conferenc…
/r/MensRights23/11/13 11:36 AM
0

Ordinals back atcha. First, the way she says it in the original video, it wasn't her accusing the guy of trying to rape her, or do nasty things to her. Instead she words it in a way that says she doesn't want to be courted at 4 am, after saying she wants to go to bed. Second, rape threats aren't something that you can defend. Period. I wouldn't defend a man making rape threats, nor would I defend a woman making rape threats. I would persecute them whether they meant it or not. It is reprehensibl…
/r/MensRights23/11/13 11:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter