TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

je_kut_is_bourgeois Archive

View 0 posts and 152 comments by je_kut_is_bourgeois on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What "unattainable standard of beauty"? You mean that thing political circlejerk bloggers talk about that only like 5-10% of females care about that most are indifferent about? Spoiler and newsflash: most human beings do not suffer from self-esteem issues that warrant therapeutic care; most human beings are not involved in being concerned about "unattainable beauty standards"; this is a very small niche that needs clinical mental help; most human beings are not depressed or self-conscious about …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 08:44 PM
1

Personally, I find myself liking both. Maybe because this whole "masculine" vs "non masculine" distinction is just something created in some small space that is pretty arbitrary that the rest of the world doesn't care nearly as much about as they do. It's as if they convinced themselves there that black hair is super important on a male and get all obsessed in categorizing them as blackhairs or not and the rest of the world reading that is like "Well.. I like both" which is code for "I would hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 09:16 PM
2

There was a post on r/askmen but an FtM that transitioned that remarked upon the feeling that after a while "body parts" became attractive in a vacuum on their own which was apparently a completely new feeling. I personally can't say I ever found "body parts" attractive on its own like that; the entire picture is or it isn't and it has to fit together.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 01:20 AM
2

I'm like "no pill"; I'm not in-between red and blue; I think both are dumb though red ever so slightly dumber than blue. I don't want to be approached for social reasons and "my ideal man" wouldn't do that. If I'm being approached it's for business like asking directions or having a specific enquiry that that individual believes only I can answer. What kind of men do you think you are filtering out I've come to soft-conclude that I essentially have only one criterion to socially interact with an…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 11:11 PM
-1

And this is why every time you see "i'm 100% ${sexual orientation}" it's to be taken with a massive grain of salt. It's just emotional attachment to labels and disliking the sound of certain labels—I can't take this sexual orientation culture seriously; these terms from inception were not about being descriptive but about social tribalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/19 08:25 PM
3

I think even this classification is stupid. The question of whether or not I am "more attracted to males" or "more attracted to females" makes no sense; how do you quantify that? The problem is that human beings are not attracted to groups but to individuals. I can answer whether I'm more attracted to Jack or Jill but these statements can't be made about an entire group; depends on the male or female you're talking about and asking. Edit: Basically those that answer this question are doing one o…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/19 08:23 PM
1

You must be from the United States. lel @ a developed nation not having healthcare as a positive human right.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/19 03:30 AM
1

Where I live most of this stuff is arranged via cohabitational contracts that also manage alimony if agreed upon; they are naturally far more flexible and customizable than marriage so from a business perspective it's the saner deal. Also they have no upper bound to the number of parties that can be involved in them and are also often executed between roomies that have no romantic ties but nevertheless share a household and finances.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/19 03:30 AM
1

I have no interest in marriage in fact I have no interest in being something's "girlfriend" which is just a social marriage with a different label either.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/19 03:28 AM
1

Which is just nonsense; a lot of kings loved to stress that they were kings. This frequent maxim that one often hears is that if you praise yourself it by necessity must not be true is really based on aesthetic reasoning only and not a shred of empiricism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/19 03:27 AM
1

Okay so how would this work if you live in a culture that encourages not fitting in to some degree? It's often said about Dutch culture that Dutchmen—including the female ones—appreciate a willingness to offend and speak one's mind even if many would disagree. So say the Dutch female (and male) social matrix would basically entail being expected to offend and not fit in? How would that coalesce into that the female social matrix supposedly inherently requires one to fit in and not offend?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/19 02:02 AM
1

I am still not exactly sure what it is; it seems to be a vague term everything defines differently and it seems to be about groups of more than two individuals. It has probably been a decade since I had social interaction that was not one-on-one; I rarely hang out with two or more individuals socially; that's a business meeting.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 08:42 PM
1

Are you a girl? Quite. And are you American? Hell no. Too many women here have acknowledged the FSM exist. Just because you ignore or choose not to acknowledge something doesn't refute its existence I never denied nor acknowledged that it exists; I merely say it's perfectly easy to ignore it with little to no consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 07:56 PM
2

Opting out of the FSM is possible, but a girl essentially needs a husband or to be married to her career ....why? I have neither, work part time, work only enough to survive on a meagre wage because I value wasting time on reddit more. Why would I "need" that? A girl friend of mine is going through a rough patch right now, and is looking to her female friends for emotional support. It can be exhausting for us, but it’s worth the investment for those of us participating in the FSM "emotional supp…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 07:20 PM
1

From what I've observed IRL, women don't seem to have this option. Women seem like they're constantly pressed to fall in line with the group, or else. Social pressure is taken, not given. Those that say they don't "feel pressure" don 't take the pressure rather than it not being offered to them. She might be socially ostracized. Never noticed Unsavory rumors may "magically" start circulating about her. Also never noticed but hey they usually gossip behind your back. Or in some extreme cases, she…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 07:13 PM
3

I believe all these social categories are useless; that includes gender, ethnicity, subcultures, sexual orientations and any other social tribal category.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 06:11 PM
1

I think it should be entirely legal to damage your unborn child, after all it is legal to abort it based on it being your own body. however I believe that certain behaviour that creates lasting damage should lead to a forced abortion and termination. The only illegal part is not actually going through with the termination in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 03:48 PM
1

Just jealous, not necessarily untrusting. It's a goal in and of itself if you will. Some find it unpleasant if their SO has sex with another individual; others find it unpleasant if their SO just hangs out with another individual even if they had a tape of it to insure no sexysex happened they're still uncomfortable just seeing their SO have a fun conversation with another.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/19 05:23 AM
1

I don't have facebook nor instagram and don't want either and I don't want to get married for the love of God... this is very complex. Are you saying I could avoid marriage by getting an instagram account?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/19 11:39 PM
1

Yes, 33%, not 50%. As I said the active fantasy in both sexes is considerably less common than the passive one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/19 07:24 PM
2

No, half the males fantasize about being raped. In both sexes the active rape fantasy is considerably less common than the passive one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/19 07:01 PM
2

is that a fact? It's a statistic: https://edition.cnn.com/2016/01/07/health/bisexuality-on-the-rise/index.html 1.9% homosexual and 2.0% bisexual. Of course this is just self-identified report; if you show people porn and measure physical arousal responses you'll find that close to 100% of humans are bisexual. Also a fact? OP's link says it about females but this one about males as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_fantasy#Fantasy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/19 06:40 PM
6

"serious problem" is vague. What exactly is the serious problem concretely how does it manifest outside of touching oneself to Lolita?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/19 06:09 PM
2

You just found your roommate touching himself to gay porn, and his browser history has been filled with male-on-male pornography for years. If he told you "I'm NOT actually attracted to other men", would you buy it? Or would you just think he's a closeted gay man? Your post starts of with unironic bi-erasure; more males are bisexual than homosexual but sure. Also for whatever reason when a female watches female/female porn nothing calls the that being a closeted lesbian which shows how much all …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/19 06:09 PM
1

I must say the Americana in that video is on a scale hitherto undreamt of. I've never seen something quite so American.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/19 07:24 AM
2

I don't want a partner; I don't want an ltr; I certainly don't want marriage. I mostly just want a good conversation and having fun; I've no interest in "sharing my life" with anything. To have fun with them all that matters really is a sense of humour, no sense of morality or social appropriateness and in general being flexible and not thinking in boxes, social conventions and labels and we're good to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/19 07:20 AM
2

This is how pretty much every Japanese romcom series ever works and many keep it ambiguous whether they're lovers at the end or not. It's a tried and tested formula that the two main protagonists are implausibly dense to their own feelings and need some external event to realize them and almost always start off initially disliking each other. From what I hear about Japanese culture it's also not at all unusual for a couple of weeks to pass before the first kiss after you've officially become a c…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/19 04:02 PM
1

So does this also work with same-sex friendships/ No one tries hard to begon friends there? If nothing else it happens because some individuals are quite lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/19 03:58 PM
2

Okay, let's assume for sake of argument that that is true— then that's just the ones you like. It's really fairly simple; there's a huge amount of selection going on in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 10:28 PM
1

The only way that I'd somewhat differ from this opinion is in terms of finance; whilst he need not have more money than me, he can at least take care of himself financially and won't be begging me for money. If another individual begs for money then your finances are mixed eh. It's inevitable that finances will be mixed if in a defacto relationship, at least in the country I live. That's what de facto relationships are: mixing your life together and why I don't do them. Other human beings have n…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 10:26 PM
1

I think it might just be not the ones you like.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 10:25 PM
1

I am very much not sure what you're trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 09:07 PM
0

Heart is the weakest power anyway. The fuck man the other four can summon fucking tornados and earthquakes but sure "power of heart"—fuck heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 09:05 PM
5

The problem is when one party is simply not interested in being friends and never was and just uses it as a stepping stone. There's a difference between a couple starting off as friends and there basically being a one-sided friendship because one party is completely uninterested in being friends but hides that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 09:04 PM
3

Do I do that? I don't think I ever did that. But hey, this is PDD, the land of "Hey I just had a problem with a single individual of $gender... that did $thing: why does $gender always do this $thing?" Fuck man I just had a male at the cafeteria incorrectly give me back 20 cents too few. WHY DO MALES DO THIS? WHY DO MALES GIVE FEMALES 20 CENTS TOO FEW AT TH CAFETERIA I SAY?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 09:01 PM
1

That's because you're using weird, inscurtable freedom units that aren't understood outside of some weird country across the Atlantic where they still use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 05:57 PM
4

Is it worse than offline? Individuals are generally single for like many years before they find something? What are you expecting?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 05:55 PM
3

A guy is looking for a fight and insults you with the intention of getting your SO to defend your honor. I thankfully have no social associates that would try to "defend my honour"; I'm pretty sure I select them upon this trait because I think it's super annoying. I can defend my own "honour" and I think it's more fun to engage them in a discussion about it anyway. A guy insults your SO directly looking for a fight. Verbal fights are fun to watch; physical fights are fun to watch if done by prac…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 08:00 PM
3

I have this theory (bear with me lol) that when a woman dates a man who has characteristics women in general don’t find attractive, he has to make up for them in at least one traditionally masculine characteristic. As an example, I’ve seen women saying they love soft guys, but they don’t mean a 5’3” soft guy, they want a 6’5” lumberjack softie. When they date a short guy, they like him being very dominant. Yes, because every single human being loves at least one "masculine characteristic" as wel…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 02:32 PM
2

From my perspective "dominant" and "submissive" are terms as useless as "right wing" vs "left wing" or "masculine" vs "feminine" and that is what explains these different perceptions. "dominant" and "submissive" are like all the other things a bunch of arbitrary things lumped together and what is and lumped together in those boxes differs from individual to individual; it's useless to talk about artefacts relative to terms such as these.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 02:27 PM
1

I think there is potentially a bias for socially acceptable answer to be more highly upvoted. There is also no way to know that the men on r/askmen are representative of the average, especially young, man. There are also women reading r/askmen so that makes me even further believe women are contributing to the bias by upvoted answers they like/wish were true. And again; how do you know what you profess to know? You haven't answered that. I have also pointed out that what you describe as the defa…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 09:27 PM
1

Don't you think it's somewhat more likely that they're just telling the truth which also matches the behaviour of most males which aren't perpetually trying to have sex with things and that maybe just maybe it's only a very small minority of males that constantly wants to have sex and some of them found the Red Pill which convinced them their extreme position is normal? Let me reverse it: where do you base the idea upon that the average male is "constantly horny" because if you are truly "consta…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 08:16 PM
1

I don't profess to know how the average male behaves and I think anything that does is clearly not being objective because there is no way to know. I only profess to know how the average male does not behave which is far easier to answer. It's a lot easier to see what something is not than what something is. I definitely know that: and youre almost constantly horny. [...] you this constant urge to have sex most of the day, you look out and most of your opposite gender peers are fuckable to you, …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 06:51 PM
0

Im speaking in general terms, if you were a man you would most likely fall into the average. And I'm saying that you basically assume that these are "the averages" because that's what the red pill tells you. The entire thing with criticizing the red pill is criticizing the idea that these are "the averages". Most opponents of the red pill believe this is like 5% at best that found a nice subculture that keeps telling them that this is normal which is what they want to hear. I'm sorry but your id…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 06:39 PM
2

Then your entire premise falls apart because there's nothing to justify the red pill from then any more. Then all this stuff about wanting sex, wanting relationships and what-not falls apart so how does it then serve to justify it?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 06:24 PM
1

So, lets say you were born a man. However tall you are now, add 5 inches to your height, whatever you would rate your face out of 10 without makeup, is how facially attractive you are now, if you have a fit body now you also have one as a man. If you have big tits and a nice ass, well now you get to be 6'2 and have a big dick. Well by your metric in weird units they use in some weird country across the Atlanic I'm already 194 cms now which would be 6'4" in your primitive system of measurements a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 05:59 PM
1

Romans do— panem et circenses dona populo.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 02:15 AM
1

I feel it didn't make a single shit of a difference in my case. This was the Netherlands for a 1985 birth; you know the good stuff a single parent by choice from the era where Dutch children addressed their parents by first name from infancy. I went on studying mathematics as a female completely blissfully ignorant of "more women in STEM" politics and I didn't really bother to notice that only about 20% of the class was female and all that politics went past me until basically reddit where I was…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 01:17 AM
1

I prefer tentacles; I find these earthlings with their one penis to be insufficient and inferior.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 05:29 PM
13

This sub seems to be absolutely full of those that try to ascertain what $gender thinks... a lost cause because ${gender}s are not a collective consciousness with a single opinion. It's also hilarious when they come with statistics that prove "See, this is how $gender thinks!" and then it's like 62% or something. Like there was a poster here that triumphantly came with a statistic about "see, this is how males think, and this is how females think" about forum moderation when the statistic said t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 03:33 PM
1

To me such generalizations are most useful as a theoretical “median individual” kind of analysis. What would a median individual be incentivized to do given gender patterns in culture? Median individuals are incredibly rare most often. In a lot of cases there is only exactly one median individual. There is only exactly one human being on this planet that is median hight and that is the human being that is in the middle when all human beings are lined up based on height. For instance i personally…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 10:26 PM
3

Lel "sexual exclusivity". Yeah sure you keep making agreements like that that are super easy to break without beng caught. It's like getting something to swear not to drink a drink it enjoys and not expecting it to not avail when it's alone and you have no way of checking or finding out. Almost all that got caught cheating weren't being careful; it's super easy to do it without ever getting caught.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/19 07:14 PM
3

There seems to be very little left of the original philosophy now. A lot of them are married; it mostly just now seem to be "place where males come complain about females"—few are going their own way there now.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 11:25 PM
2

It's mostly just independent female income I feel. Marriage was always basically a profession for females, the only legal form of prostitution at the time—a prostitute, maid, and baby factory all in one. It was basically a form of employment and the only way to gain income.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 05:37 AM
1

If you want to follow the money then having children is not a financially sound decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 05:35 AM
0

What? I am a male, and I am pretty sure neither gender has ever been "OK" with cheating. There are people who cheat, "cheating" only exists obviously when one is not "okay" with it; if one is okay with it it's not called "cheating" generally. Having said that this whole idea of "relationships" in general is not a cultural absolute. It is human nature to be disgusted/hurt/disappointed from cheating. It's not even "human nature" to get some fancy relationship label. You do realize that some humans…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 05:34 AM
1

So how does being queer make other people’s views differ from the cishet norm? Do LGBT people notice that other LGBT people don’t act in accordance to these expectations? I think "gender" is an overrated category that for some reason a lot of factions including the "LGBT community" need to categorize everything relative to. There are more interesting ways to classify human beings than by "gender" that has far more impact. The "LGBT-community" is so possibly even more obsessed with gender than th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 04:28 AM
2

The US has no "liberal" party because it only has two parties. From Wikipedia: Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), capitalism (free markets), democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion. The two main US parties both want some of those but n…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 07:41 PM
1

Ahh, you must be from the United States; the one country in the world where "liberal" as a word has nothing to do with liberty. Like every fucking where else "liberal" means what is on the tin and typically means capitalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 07:20 PM
1

You might want to define what a "player" is: When I was a teenager "player" meant an individual that would supposedly fake loving you and then immediately dump you to emberass you or something. My experiences with them was that what was probably my best friend at the time was one; utter sociopath in retrospect but never boring to be around. It found it humorous to play with the feelings of others like that and then break their hear and truth be told I found it amusing to watch from a distance. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 04:07 PM
17

Like half of the topics on this sub are always like "Why does $gender do this one specific thing all the time?" and with most of you read it and you're completely not convinced that $gender indeed does that all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/19 05:19 AM
1

However I hear so many different opinions on money that it is really difficult for me to understand what woman generally think about money. It's almost like this quest of "what do females want" and "what do males want" has no answer because indeed there are so many different opinions? If there was actually a "thing females want" there would be no debate; it would have been found a long time ago and be mainstream consensus because it's obvious. That's how it goes with universals. The reason there…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 03:01 PM
2

Often hear the saying “you can ask a fish how it catch it” or similar when the subject of “getting dating advice on women from women comes up” A fish doesn't want to be caught and tries to escape fearing for its life... if that's how you approach this all then well yeah... But what I haven’t seen in discussion is the opposite. How effective do you think asking men dating advice about men? "dating advice" from random strangers on the internet that don't know you is in general a disaster I feel; h…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 01:16 AM
5

The quality of advice is with respect to what one wants to achieve. I'm sure it's good advice if you want to achieve something I do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 01:10 AM
1

Nobody says you have to be Mr. Olympia Quite right — that works against you. 95% of females are going to consider Mr. Olympia "gross" and that goes for like 75% of males too. Mr. Olympia is a very specific niece. but a dad bod won't cut it Actually females when asked to choose between "ripped" and "dad bod" say they dislike dad bod less than ripped. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/dad-bods-are-more-attractive-than-six-packs-study-says/ar-AAD3K0P That's not to say they like a dad-bod they …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 06:38 PM
1

And that too is cultural and apart from that 99% of the time when on /r/PurplePillDebate they talk about "the body females are attracted to" they mean "the body males are attracted to in their own repressed sexuality" because hint hint hint hint hint: female are not in general attracted to "bodies" even close to as much as males are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/19 01:52 PM
2

I generally envision an unattractive, old, bald, short man with bad hygiene when it comes to touching women in public. Then you need to seriously re-evaluate how objective you can be. It indicates you suffer from a massive halo-effect and have a hard time correctly fragmentating individual qualities of humans and analysing each independently.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 06:09 PM
1

Yeah that too: because everything that is not physically impossible will happen if you stretch out time long enough. That's my point and why your claim is useless because it can be made for every receiver and predicate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 04:17 PM
5

Well AWALT just means all women have the potential to follow their hypergamy. So basically the goalpost is moved till the statement because useless and unfalsifiable. That can be said about everything; everything has "the potential to ..." whatever you want it to have the potential to; that's a useless statement. I made a post they removed a while back that suggested all women will follow their hypergamy at some point. Not one woman said they would. Yet most women I know have at one point done i…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 04:13 PM
2

It's as fair as in any case of violence depending on the context. "domestic violence" need not exist as a legal category; I don't get the obsession with distinguishing domestic and non-domestic violence; violence is violence and the law has always made a distinction between unprovoked and provoked violence. If you beat up another individual for absolutely no reason you'll face higher punishment than if the individual provoked the action somehow by first insulting you or doing something else. It …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 02:36 PM
16

Why the double standard? The two are not comparable because this one contains a conditional rather than an absolute statement. It is not "all males want to fuck me" but "all males that out of nowhere for no reason strike a social conversation with me want to fuck me" That qualification obviously delimits the scope of the statement severely.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 12:23 PM
2

Why do women do this? Have you ever known a woman who admittedly did this? To get free food obviously. Does this put women in danger? (fake interest in a guy) Probably not How should men watch out or defend themselves against this type of behavior? Don't be an idiot that pays for another's food. If have a stand that dishes out free food then some might actually take advantage and get some free food... gee. Would you consider this a form of fraud? Fraud in the legal sense? No, but an implicit lie…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 06:23 PM
1

I wouldn't be interested with such personality traits. I absolutely hate it when individuals say they "understand"; if we're on one wavelength about something it'll show on its own. edit: main gist of this is meant to be about assertiveness Well I don't really care much about assertiveness; I just dislike let's call it "politeness"; it's orthogonal to assertiveness. Individuals can be assertive or a pushover all they want as long as they're not polite.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/19 12:39 AM
1

No because if that were the case then males would be far less interested in sex than they are now.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 01:57 AM
2

It's pretty simple: two clingy individuals are a good match: two distant individuals are a good match. Where it goes wrong is if there's a significant disparity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 01:31 AM
0

Human culture is fairly good it seems at overriding biology. The weird thing about a lot of "western" cultures today is that the female puts more effort into its physical appearance than the male; this wasn't always the case and still isn't in many cultures; it essentially does not make much sense int his theory. The less selective sex is always the showier sex that invest more effort into attracting and flaunting its sexual selection markers. In a lot of cultures it was mostly the males that we…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 12:32 AM
4

Especially when pretty and cute. Remember: pretty, cute and youthful looking humans with big eyes that are female and white never tell a lie and need 5 times the police funds as everything else to try to find them when they go missing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 05:50 PM
1

How about the possibility that there is no consistent unified reason as to why female humans "dress sexy" and that this differs for every single one: Possible reasons include: to attract male attention in general to attract the attention of one specific male to get a promotion to simply stand in font of a mirror at home and look sexy and never wear it outside to go to a party and score a one night stand after a dry spell of 6 months to attract female attention in general to attract the attention…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 12:49 PM
0

i dont believe one human off of reddit bases their fears on statistics Fear is an emotion. If you base your responses on statistics then you don't feel fear; you're just acting rationally and dispassionately in that case. Fear is an instinct; it is always the product of emotion and not of higher reasoning. Higher reasoning leaves humans dispassionate, not emotional.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 03:52 PM
1

I don't remember a single time; it probably happened once or twice but it didn't make enough of an impact to remember. What precautions do you take to try to make yourself feel safe? I lock my door, use long and random passwords, use full drive encryption, sometimes neurotically check if the cooking plate is really turned off, always put candles into containers, check if food is not past its expiry date and sniff it.... I probably should be looking out more when I cross the street though; I don'…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 03:50 PM
1

For this thread, let me define "toxic femininity" as behaviors or ideas that have a negative impact on men or even society as a whole. I'm pretty sure every human being has behaviours or ideas that are negative to a great number of individuals, some of which male.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 07:12 PM
5

I see no reason you should feel guilty of this; the grass is always greener on the other side. I've read a couple of blogs from individuals that moved from catcall-heavy cultures to cultures where it doesn't really occur that were forced to admit that feeling completely invisible wasn't all that great either and that they'd prefer a middle-ground between both.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 04:26 PM
1

I always walk outside with headphones on; the few times I didn't I couldn't help but overhear some individuals talking about me (all cases positive). It's possible I've been "sexually harassed", looked like a total badarse completely ignoring it and not giving a damn whilst in reality I just didn't hear it because I was too busy getting my eardrums damaged. But really I can't recall a single time I've been catcalled; it might in fact not be that common where I live. I read some articles on the i…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 04:25 PM
1

Could be but the infiltration has made the left obsessed about morals that were typically the domain of the right as in sexual - and language morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 01:59 PM
2

control, suppression, and authoritarianism is as much the hallmark of leftwing ideologies, as they are rightwing ideologies. in fact, altho they're different, they sometimes have remarkable similarities Maybe but I wasn't talking about "control", suppression" and "authoritarianism"; I was talking about "language control", "social authoritarian" and didn't mention "suppression" It's clear that the left always wanted to control the market and bring it under state or collective control whereas the …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/19 01:35 PM
4

Do "women" say that? I've never seen that being said by anything except on reddit a couple of times and I'm also sure that when they say "to achieve stuff" they mostly just mean "to achieve whatever random thing that lends social prestige"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 09:02 AM
0

Ah, so basically females "lie" when they each come with a different answer to what they want but the red pill is right about and you just ignore the common evidence in this sub that many males express that they want different things than what the red pill says they want as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 04:50 PM
1

Your problem is that you think there's a "thing males want" or "thing females want"; if such a thing actually existed it would've been found a long time ago by simple trial and error and then provided and all would be happy. The reason the search for this elusive "thing females want" is rather fruitless is because there is no such thing and your mileage varies with different test-subjects. The reason you think there is actually an easy "thing males want" is because that's what you want and you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 03:48 PM
2

Lol, at every time in human history mankind has pat itself on the back about how much rights there now are. When only freeborn males that paid sufficient taxes could vote it was called "democracy"as well; when finally all the males could vote it was called "universal suffrage". I'm pretty sure there's going to be a time when even minors and convicts can vote and then people will look back upon today and be like "Yeah well.. that whole idea of minors voting leading to a disaster... well that was …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 01:54 PM
1

Honestly I think a big reason is just that there is very little "dating strategy for females" because there is less of a market for it in the same way that there is far viewer "fashion advice for males" because the market is smaller. Females don't care half as much about reading books with supposed wisdom to help them succeed in courting males as males care about doing this with females.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 01:51 PM
1

"masculine" is a buzzword without meaning that gets redefined to mean whatever the speaker wants it to mean to push whatever agenda. There's really not much that can be said about "masculine" or "feminine". I know what I find attractive in an individual but there are going to be endless debates by those that give a crap about these buzzwords whether those traits are "masculine" or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 12:07 PM
1

Zero—it doesn't even phase me if they have sex with others and enjoy it more than with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 12:03 PM
11

I also feel that the US lifestyle means that those that don't go to the gym are typically just unattractively fat. US lifestyle in both food and amount of activity requires one to go to the gym to stay in shape. In Europe a lot of individuals that don't go to the gym are neither fat nor muscular. Like Europeans when they taste American food often have to get used to how sweet everything tastes. American bread practically tasted like candy to me the first time I ate it with how much sugar there's…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 12:00 PM
1

7-10: fuckable as long as he isn't like insane or a pedo or something. Pfah—I smell great roleplaying opportunities in the latter case.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 06:10 PM
5

In my limited research I have found that there tends to be the most agreeance between what is MOST ATTRACTIVE and MOST UNATTRACTIVE. So if you're very ugly you're typically ugly to all females. If you're very attractive most women will indeed find you attractive. However for most of us who are normies there appears to be a much larger gap with a lot less certainty. I only feel there's a lot of agreement in "most unattractive" which is typically physcial deformities but even there there is a lot …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 06:01 PM
1

This is assuming that both partners benefit from the higher QoL that a higher combined income gives. If the higher earner was instead keeping the extra income for themselves and only financially contributing as much as their lower earning partner, this would be a different question entirely. I'd say that in that case it's by definition not "fair" but I don't believe in these "pooled money" arrangements: to each their own money. Having said that pooled resources are by consent; therefore whatever…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 12:16 PM
1

"confidence" is a useless buzzword that means a different thing to all speakers. The reason everything supposedly likes "confidence" is because everything means a different thing with "confidence"; it's the same reason everything likes "beautiful" because everything has a different opinion of what "beautiful" is. "become beautiful" is no advice and neither is "become confident". What one finds "confident" another finds "creepy" or "boring" or "rude" or whatnot.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 01:15 PM
1

I in general don't use words that have a different meaning for every perceiver. I use words with the aim that the listener has the same perception of said word as I—to actually use language for communication rather than emotional self-gratification; it's a revolutionary new concept that it seems most individuals haven't caught onto yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 09:38 AM
2

She’s a confident woman who’s on the bigger side, but his porn habits are a blow to her self esteem. Apparently not that confident then eh? She wants to change him so he “never looks at a teen that way again” and she calls bullshit when he says all men are into teens. She installed an app on his phone to monitor what he’s watching. Virtually any claim that starts with "all" is bullshit. So, I ask the women here, what do you think about porn? Do you think the woman above is right? I think porn is…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 08:24 AM
2

That's the case culturally where I live (Netherlands) for the most part. The thing is that it doesn't change the fact that females on average are far more selective than males. Males don't really approach females much where I live because it will almost never be a success story; that's not to say that females approach males with the same frequency as males do in the cultures where males tend to approach. For the most part individuals don't really talk to strangers much here to begin with. But in…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 06:53 PM
1

You're not, people masturbate. Its weird that you think your partner absolutely needs another sex outlet And yet reddit is full of "Oh my god we have a sexual friction problem" that is either caused by conflicting libidos or one wanting to do certain things the other does not but the one that wants to do it is also not allowed to do them with others. People make assumptions about ugly people too. Yes, negative ones, not positive ones so if they later gain a positive impressin you've disproven th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 12:42 PM
1

Why even do relationships at all Why not? it seems like you're asexual or something? Not at all; I enjoy sex as much as the next one; I just don't enjoy the feeling of being the sole individual responsible for another's sexual satisfaction. More objective in what way? How does it benefit you? It benefits me in that I don't have to deal with the crap down the line where they find out I'm not that perfect faerie they imagined me to be simply because they saw I'm aesthetic. The best friendships are…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 11:53 AM
0

First off I'd want them to cheat on me. I don't like being the sole individual responsible for another's sex life. Having said that I don't really care much about the visual aesthetics of whatever I associate with; human beings in general aren't aesthetic and if I want to look at aesthetic things I can easily find that on the internet. I also prefer my social associates to consider me ugly and they usually do so yeah I'm going to go with that one. I don't really see the merits in being considere…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 11:12 AM
2

It's a useless buzzword everything fills in differently. The reason you're getting completely different answers everything you ask this is because it's one of those emotionally laden buzzwords that aren't meant for communication but basically to gratify the insecurity of the speaker which can be appeased with nothing but the use of specific words. It means nothing; it's a word; like "justice", or "mature', or "cruel and unusual punishment"; the stuff politics, love letters, and constitutions opp…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 04:04 AM
1

Really? I feel "gender studies" and "black studies" is mostly shat on because it's politics dressed as academia it's pretty clear it does not even attempt to be neutral and objective but is taught from a political standpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/19 04:02 AM
1

I mean then they are by definition not "progressive" but I think you're more so referring to "the left" vs "the right" and yeah it's sometimes remarked that a lot of elements that traditionally belong to "the right" have infiltrated "the left" in recent years and that it has gotten very big on sexual moralism; promoting gender roles; language control; social collectivism and social authoritarianism which wasn't really the case in say the 90s.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/19 05:57 PM
1

...emerging? This standard is pretty old and every single thing on reddit is aware of it whether they defend it or not... let's not act like this OP is threading on new revolutionary territory here. Same with the Biden discussion. Biden is actually just as touchy with males but nothing seems to care about or talk about it. Male->female is the only type of sexual impropriety that is ever discussed; nothing seems to care about male->male, female->male, and female->female.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/19 05:55 PM
1

You're using mental gymnastics in an attempt to apply your thinking to the majority of society. Where am I applying my thinking to the majority of society? The only thing I'm applying it to is me; I'm saying that I neither look down on sugar babies and that it's not a profession I like to do in exactly the same way that I don't look down on clinical psychologists but it's not a profession that I want to do because I'm very antisocial and don't in general like talking to strangers. I can no longe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 04:59 PM
1

And what does that have to do with "mental gymnastics"? Your argument is that people supposedly have "mental gymnastics" because they claim to not look down on sugar babies all the while not being interested in doing it themselves. How is that a remotely contradictory statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 03:06 PM
1

And as I said being a champion is a negative for me because I don't want to be famous and being a whore is indifferent.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 11:03 AM
4

Are we becoming an absurdly touch phobic, boundary obsessed culture ? Only famous high profile individuals. It's simple, 99.9% of those watching the picture would not mind and 99.9% of fans would love to be touched but it's still not worth it. I remember a poster on reddit saying "I will never compliment a co-worker on appearance." with the logic that even though 99% is going to be fine with it it's still not worth the risk because there is nothing to gain from it and in the 1% chance that a co-…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 10:57 AM
1

This whole "submissive" vs "dominant" distinction is about as stupid as "the left" vs "the right" or "masculine" vs "feminine". It's a bunch of completely unrelated qualities that are grouped together in arbitrary ways because "cultural convention". As it stands I'm an individual with a soft voice that very easily goes along with the plans of others because I'm largely indifferent but will ademently put my foot down when I don't want to and expect others to do the same. I rarely tell others what…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 09:18 AM
1

Because obviously the ones that are interested in splitting are the ones that don't care for gender roles and there was never a gender role that the female should pay all of it. Each paying their own food is the logical option in a world without tradition. The male paying for both is what tradition-bound fools do. I'm not going to pay for what others are doing and accepting; I have never in my life had another individual pay for my food when we were out on lunch together and what others do is no…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 09:12 AM
1

The health risks of professional football are probably higher; as I said they cut into their life expectancy by a great amount.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 07:52 AM
1

Read the comments. Don't be lazy. I did and it's not in there; if you feel it is you're welcome to link the post where it is. Lol. Mental gymnastics 😆 And you agreed with me. You don't have skill. With the pay. You could do anything you want. Lol. Next Actually that's a misconception; only the very crème de la crème of professinal footballers earns millions; it's a very top-heavy industry. The average player for Manchester United doesn't even earn that much and it's a lot of work. But let's even…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 06:36 AM
1

I can tell you don't understand what "majority of society " means. The phrase "majority of society" isn't mentioned in any of the parent comments so I'm not sure where you're heading at with this. I'll have a go at your mental gymnastics. Depends on the reason you don't want to be a football player. Most people don't want to be football players because they don't have the skill or guts to risk injury. What's your reason? I said don't want to so obviously skill is hypothetically not an issue; we'…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 08:39 PM
4

Do I look down upon professional football players simply because it's not a profession I'd ever want to do myself?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 06:41 PM
6

Do they set women back Whatever influence such a small group has is negligible Do they embarrass you? Why would I be embarrassed by the actions of another individual? Do you think they devalue relationships by putting a price tag on it? Evidently by demonstrating that some are willing to pay a hefty price for it they demonstrate their value to those individuals that are willing to pay that price. Do you think it's empowering Money is power; it's as empowering as any profession that compensates f…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/19 06:38 PM
2

The "objective" definition of masculinity and femininity is simply whatever trait is statistically more common with one sex than the other—which is hardly a useful way to categorize things. In practice the words are just used as asinine buzzwords and redefined by whatever speaker to mean what it wants it to mean. I don't deal in these kinds of words that have a different definition for each speaker; the point of using language is to get an idea across to me; not to engage in the wankery of emoti…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 08:21 AM
1

I mean I don't "require" anything of myself since I'm in my life whether I want to be or not. It's not like I can say "Get out; I don't ever want to speak to you again" to myself. I am the one individual I will have to live with regardless. So everything I require of anything else I don't require of myself but in practice I do do those things but that's just because that's the kind of individual that I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 07:40 AM
1

It's almost like it's the sentimental fool that gets married. Also love is an addictive, mind altering drug and only a sentimental fool would deny this biochemical reality. It is as dangerous as any other such had drug: enjoy but use responsibly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/19 03:56 AM
2

Ehh, what is this "female social matrix"? I know that I visually have not aged a day since like 16 (am am twice as old now); I look exactly the same as I did then and behave pretty much the same. What changed is that I became an independent adult living alone rather than a teenager living with relatives due to "home problems". The only difference is when the police bothers me now for committing the indecency of looking like a teenager and existing they will generally leave me alone when I show m…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 08:41 AM
0

Ideally not a cm shorter or taller than I; exactly my own height (181cm) having said that this ideal is of course easily bent.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 04:24 AM
1

Buggering an adult male was seen not only as a crime against that man but a crime against all of mankind. First off: no it wasn't there were no Greek laws against sexual intercourse between two males of similar age; it was just unusual and one was indeed typically younger but there were no laws against it; there were obviously laws against rape, yes. Pederasty was acceptable because boys weren't men. So what does that change? They were male and apart from that a lot of these younger males were a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 07:29 AM
1

Lol, please. Every self-respecting Greek, Japanese, Roman, Chinese, Indian, Persian, Ottoman and what-have you citizen was what they now call "bisexual". That so many seriously believe in this "sexual orientation" crap goes to show they never read the classics of Graeco-Roman history.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 07:05 AM
0

I don't believe heterosexuals or homosexuals exist on a biological level. If they did after 120 years of research trying to find they would have found a biological test for it by now rather than self-identification and if you try to test for sexual orientation by letting subjects watch porn and measure arousal then apparently all the subjects are bisexual. I believe "sexual orientations" are just a box individuals force themselves to conform with out of having a sense of identity and belonging. …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 05:59 AM
1

Eventually AIs will be able to scan archieved past reddit posts and fingerprint them and be able to say with high certainty what individual wrote them from a database. It won't be long before you can just upload a text a friend of yours wrote to a website and say "Please return to me all texts you crawled from the internet that have high probability of being written by the same author" "Throwaway account... because I really don't want my conservative parents to know I'm gay..."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:47 AM
2

Every time moral universalists approve things like this they implicitly assume that the definition of "good person" they have is shared by whatever party implements it; when it's actually implemented they are met with the shocking realization that "good person" is a super subjective thing and that the implementor had a different opinion of it than they.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 04:45 AM
2

There are still plenty of films that have "strong female characters" that are just good characters in their own right without having to be female for it; even Disney princesses nowadays are on that train: Moana could have just as easily been a male; it doesn't matter for the plot; it's just a strong determined character in a tight situation that pulls through with determination and wits. But those are not the things that are watched by this whole "identity crowd"; they want a character that is b…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/19 03:52 AM
0

So let me get this clear? Your argument supposedly against the idea hat workplace discrimination isn't "trivialk" is coming with a long list of non-trivial sex-related workplace discrimination? Oh wait no you were just trying to turn it into a gender war issue and in doing so ironically helped to disprove your own point because you lost track of the discussin and all you can see is some stupid pathetic little gender war.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 09:07 PM
1

Those that habitually wear high heels are 9 times as likely to develop back problems later in life than those that don't but sure it's "trivial" that companies are allowed to force employers to progressively damage their spines.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 08:51 PM
1

I said I think legal and political equality has been accomplished already. Gender-specific dress codes in schools and workplaces don't fall under my definition of that. No, you said that legal equality (which by the way has only been achieved in like three countries in North Europe and only quite recently with conscription in all three being the last to be fixed) was the only one that mattered. I was thinking more in terms of women having access to the vote, employment etc. Yes, which my point i…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 05:49 PM
1

Maybe so but that would be a good example of no gender equality because it is completely arbitrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 05:38 PM
1

Maybe you aren't but that's just saying it's meaningless to you because you don't really care about it rather than your original implication that it's meaningless because it has been accomplished already.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 05:37 PM
3

The state isn't the only powerful entity that grants you rights. For instance a lot of governments permit companies to have sex-segregated dress codes or other such things that put different demands on one sex than the other de jure.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 08:22 AM
0

It changes for those that get married obviously. Those that get married do so because they're irrational sentimental fools that care about labels for the most part; naturally that kind of individual is going to change its behaviour over a dumb label. Those that don't care about dumb labels naturally don't get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 07:20 PM
3

Nothing whatever the sex should get married unless A) you've considerably less assets than your spouse. B) you're a selfish arse willing to rob your spouse. Marriage is a flawed business decision done by fools for sentimental value; a socially-accepted equivalent of placing your stocks on Disney because you liked their films as a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 08:19 AM
1

That "filter" is such bullshit. It doesn't make you look like it; rather it summons a picture of a "cute chick" ex nihilo and puts your eyes on it or something. There's a very good reason why the filter demands that you directly use a photo you took instead of uploading a picture because if you could do that you could do the reverse filter and then you could see just how much it's just making up information as if you went both ways back it would put Google translate to shame in how much it doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 05:00 AM
4

Lol, you're not wrong. I remember a quote I read as a teenager: "Males think we make ourselves pretty for them; in reality we do it to make other females jealous." You're not wrong at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 04:56 AM
1

I honestly find this reality to be inconsequential. I grew up with cats and drawings of humanoid things; as a real life human I can never be as aesthetic as a cat or a drawing of a human and that was always common knowledge to me. I'm not sure what clearly airbrushed pictures of humans that are still inferior to drawings of humans are going to add to that mix. There are a great many things in this world more aesthetic than any human will ever be and many are just lying in my room right now—so no…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/19 04:53 AM
1

Maybe in some super fringe internet subcultures in the same way that some fringe internet subcultures that believe the holocaust never happened. But in mainstream culture if a male takes a female on a date and presents a magnificent gourmet home cooked meal then like 99% of times that will leave a very positive impression. The majority of females would be put off by males that wear as much makeup as the average female or wears similarly impractical clothing or cries as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/19 09:20 PM
1

I sometimes get feelings for some of my friends; that's it. I don't go out of my way to sit in a brown café with another individual I barely know with the purpose of forcing ourselves to develop feelings for each other which to me seems like a recipe for disaster. Whatever you "get to know" about that individual in such a setting is what they tell you about themselves where they openly try to sell themselves so you just get an overhyped picture anyway. I lend about zero credence to what human be…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/19 07:52 PM
1

"red flags" are a nasty patchwork for if you're the kind of individual to get emotionally invested into another if you don't really know the latter; it's also just a prejudice. I really don't go around looking for "red flags" because I don't do this "dating culture" stuff where you force yourself—awkwardly—to get emotionally invested in a blank canvas you know very little about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/19 07:37 PM
2

I think all four questions can easily be answered by "I would never agree to an LTR" in whatever form. "casual sex" is a word that seems to mean a thousand different things depending n the speaker. Suffice to say I never had an LTR and never will but I'm not a virgin and and had sex with most of my friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/19 06:32 AM
1

34F—It changed from zero to zero. Pair-bonding is gay as fuck. Also what does pair-bonding have to do with "developing any connection"? I've always had fairly intimate connections with all that I had sex with; I just don't pair-bond with them because as said letting another human being have control over your life is gay as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 08:42 PM
3

Probably because most of them are. Due to how it worked in the past and to some extend still today things that are related to "being self-reliant; fixing your problems; making a lot of money; being practical and putting substance over style" have become "masculine" whereas "relying on others; letting others fix your problem; using a lot of the money that others make; putting style over substance" and what-not have become "feminine" simply because 50 years back females had immense troubles making…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 10:32 PM
1

To note: despite the human being clearly being evolved for bipedal vertical locomotion there is no biological imperative to do so. Human beings walk vertically because they imitate their parents; feral children walk quadrupially. It goes to show how far memic evolution goes with humans. Human beings have never genetically evolved to have a hardcoded genetic memory on how to walk like various other animals have because there was no need to; they would imitate their parents anyway. This is differe…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 04:05 PM
1

That's because "relationships" right now are what "marriage" used to be. Like when the bible was written there was no wedding ceremony; there was no official register and individuals got "married" at like 16-18 years of age. Then governments got involved into marriage and started to register everything with all kinds of laws and then individuals started to realize that 16-18 was waaaay too fucking young for all that legal stuff so they pushed the legal marriage up or just removed it and invented…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 09:38 PM
0

Doubt it—man has always tried to control the actions of its fellow man. If it's not the government telling you that you cannot put any nonalcoholic hard drug into your body then it's your so-called "partner" telling you you can't have sex with others. It's all the same to me and it'll never end.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 09:20 PM
3

What's wrong with the sentence structures?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 08:50 PM
5

I wouldn't know how it is for "women at my age"; I only know: How are things for you personally? And: Are you struggling to find a man or are you already with somebody? I am not interesting in "finding a man" in the slighest; I just have sex with and cuddle my friends which is good enough for me. Are you worried about the wall and its consequences, maybe worried that your boyfriend or husband might want to trade you for a "younger model"? More like in the reverse; humans—especially male ones—bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/19 08:24 PM
1

"confidence" in practice is basically another word for "suave" and not the psychological definition thereof. I care negatively about suave and am indifferent about "confidence". good looks are super subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/19 04:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter