jeet_mcqueef Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Hypergamy and Monkey Branching vs. Attraction Level Do you think findings taken from a 17m+ sample across 16 different countries demonstrates the existence of hypergamy, and are the findings predictive ?	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 11:53 PM
2	Hypergamy and Monkey Branching vs. Attraction Level You can corroborate the excerpts I linked with the study itself. They state EXPLICITLY that according to their findings, hypergamy was observed to increase, and homogamy decreased respectively. Why do you insist on denying this ?	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 11:35 PM
3	Hypergamy and Monkey Branching vs. Attraction Level (N=17,300,447). Would you consider this a representative sample size ?	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 11:03 PM
2	Hypergamy and Monkey Branching vs. Attraction Level "‎However, when all marriages are included in the analysis, hypergamy has increased over time in most of these countries and remains relatively stable across female educational advantage" ‎ "‎However, our investigation of the prevalence of hypergamy in relation to all couples reveals an opposite trend: 11 of 16 countries show an increase in hypergamy as percent of total (pink line) for the most recent cohort compared to the earliest cohort. The five remaining countries (Argentina, Chile, Colombi…	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 10:36 PM
2	Hypergamy and Monkey Branching vs. Attraction Level "Using census microdata spanning 105 birth cohorts in 16 countries, we demonstrate that, rather than declining, hypergamy has increased in most countries over time and remains relatively stable across female educational advantage. Meanwhile, the prevalence of educational homogamy has declined considerably in most countries and across the axis of female educational advantage, an important trend that emerges only when homogamy is incorporated into the analysis." What part of this is false ?	/r/PurplePillDebate	15/08/26 10:25 PM
3	Hypergamy and Monkey Branching vs. Attraction Level "Using census microdata spanning 105 birth cohorts in 16 countries, we demonstrate that, rather than declining, hypergamy has increased in most countries over time and remains relatively stable across female educational advantage" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39906890/ Please stop with the wokelighting. Hypergamy has been studied cross culturally, and using data sets spanning hundreds if not thousands of data points. Any appeals to semantics or obfuscation of definitions does not disprove stu…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/08/26 09:00 PM
5	Hypergamy and Monkey Branching vs. Attraction Level It exists outside of pill spaces. How you wish to view it is up to you. But it exists	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/08/26 08:22 AM
5	Hypergamy and Monkey Branching vs. Attraction Level It exists	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/08/26 08:21 AM
9	Hypergamy and Monkey Branching vs. Attraction Level "However, our investigation of the prevalence of hypergamy in relation to all couples reveals an opposite trend: 11 of 16 countries show an increase in hypergamy as percent of total (pink line) for the most recent cohort compared to the earliest cohort" https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11790284/ One of numerous studies. It exists	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/08/26 10:09 PM
1	Paying for women on the First Dates is and has been for a very long time... Dumb. If you don't pay: she gets upset and disappointment and possible derision follow you probably won't get a second date you might end up seeing a tearful narration from her on social media with the conclusion that men are useless or something Hypergamy doesn't forgive, and gender roles are still a prerequisite for men. You have to pay to play	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/08/26 09:33 PM
0	The overwhelming are women are painstakingly disingenuous about gender roles. They want gender roles not because "it's sexy" and more because a laziness and convenience Because gender roles for women are oppressive, and those for men are a duty. Nothing more nothing less	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/08/26 11:33 PM
1	What do you think about this quote from Bell Hooks? I like the way the quote is framed. It humanizes men and puts harmful gender roles in context to patriarchy. But I also think this is an antiquated concept to modern wave feminists who believe that men are ontologically evil / oppressive, and therefore any appeals to male humanity are counterproductive to feminist goals	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/07/26 11:59 PM