TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jeff0 Archive

View 0 posts and 56 comments by jeff0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

No. If 1 in 3 men get cancer, 2 in 3 women get cancer, and half of women's cancer cases are breast cancer, then the statement is true (ignoring for a moment that someone could have multiple cancers, and men can get breast cancer).
/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:59 PM
5

I think my strong inclination to agree with the article actually has a lot to do with my being a "beta male". It makes it easy for me to blame my dating failures on women's supposedly unreasonable standards rather than my own personal failings. It also comfortingly tells me that things will get easier with time, as women my own age will have progressively lower standards. To really convince myself that this true and not just confirmation bias, I would be interested in seeing a survey of the numb…
/r/MensRights15/07/11 05:52 PM
4

If you want to be pedantic about it, I'm pretty sure what they mean by "medium" is the midrange. The statistics here are a bit wonky though, as users are (as far as I can tell) unable to rate another user as a zero. I'm guessing that the values given here are intended to be location of the lower end of some confidence interval for that user (as this how OKC calculates "match %"). I'm not sure how CIs are supposed to work with contrained data range like this, but I don't know that it makes sense …
/r/MensRights15/07/11 05:31 PM
3

If two people in a relationship are of wildly different ages, but both of the age of consent, then both parties are equally responsible for the relationship; the older person should not be seen as predatory. If a woman bemoans men's tendencies to be interested in younger women, make sure to point out women's tendencies to be interested in older men.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 04:13 PM
10

It's sad that your comment is the only one out of dozens so far that acknowledges the content of the article. Emily's comment at the end was a little awkward. She was essentially saying that there's no good reason men should be expected to pay, but they should offer anyway to avoid upsetting entitled women. I suppose this is true if you have few redeeming qualities aside from your salary.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 01:12 AM
3

Great quote. However, I do think that the last bit applies to mens' views of women as well (though I suspect women have higher standards of attractiveness).
/r/MensRights29/06/11 09:42 PM
1

I suppose that's possible, but it's a very bleak view to take of women. Remember the article from a couple weeks ago about how we should leave politics to women, because men are too sexually driven to be effective? Your remark seems like the same sort of thinking applied to women.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 03:02 PM
2

What's this doing here? "Menstruating ladies be crazy" isn't a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 06:04 PM
1

Who said anything about state intervention?
/r/MensRights14/06/11 06:58 PM
2

Correct. There are no objective standards for what counts as disrespect. It's a good thing that disrespect is not a crime.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 06:57 PM
5

If you're making someone extremely uncomfortable, I wouldn't say that you're engaging in a totally harmless behavior.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 12:23 PM
2

Point taken. Your implication that men are being treated as dogs, though, seems quite unfounded.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 06:22 AM
2

Repetition is a useful learning tool. I'm going to have to ask you to stay after class and write, "I will not seek out misandry where there is none," fifty times neatly on the chalkboard.
/r/MensRights10/06/11 06:02 AM
9

Yes, you did. She was not explaining her own opinions, but rather the way society at large tends to view gender roles.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 12:29 AM
1

I am not talking about stereotypes, specifically, but more the nature vs. nurture debate. The prevailing feminist take on this is that biological forces are irrelevant in forming someone's personality; that all gender differences, aside from the overtly physical ones, are the result of social conditioning. This idea seems absurd to me, given that we know men and women to be influenced by different mixtures of hormones. I am not, however, saying that any particular gender stereotype is true for a…
/r/MensRights07/06/11 12:20 PM
2

I only read the first article, but I was pleased to see that it addresses one of my big beefs with third-wave (i.e. modern) feminism; the idea men and women would be the same were it not for social constructs.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 06:02 PM
2

I don't think that's a problem. In the article's scenario, though, the woman was clearly much more successful, but expected the guy to pick up the check. That said, I've been in a similar situation and simply suggested to my date that we split the bill.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 05:13 AM
5

ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights03/06/11 06:57 PM
1

Interesting service, but in the FAQ: Can single fathers join the service? Right now our service is offered to single mothers only. Although we do intend on expanding this to also match single fathers for share housing, this is something we plan to offer single fathers in the future.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 02:56 PM
3

I really wish this hadn't spent the first seven minutes on the expectation that men pay for dates. While it is a prevalent misandrist attitude, it's fairly minor problem in the scope of things.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 10:12 AM
2

I don't buy it. There are no cues to suggest anything of the sort.
/r/MensRights26/05/11 10:03 AM
1

Murder is hilarious, amirite?
/r/MensRights26/05/11 09:41 AM
2

It is older and more active. As to why they picked "feminisms" rather than "feminism," I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 07:30 PM
2

/r/feminisms is the main feminism subreddit. Given that gender issues are so polarizing, I think it's a good idea to read /r/feminisms along with /r/mensrights to keep a balanced perspective.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 02:59 PM
2

Here is a conversation I had about this a few months ago. (Well, not exactly this, it was about women being careful while drinking rather than about how they dress).
/r/MensRights01/05/11 05:20 AM
10

Then a cute boy I wanted to date refused to ask me out, so that's rape (expelled). Then a guy held open a door for me, that's obviously rape. Hyperbole doesn't do us any good.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 03:35 AM
1

Came here to say this and get downvoted, but you beat me to the downvotes. This 57% thing probably says more about how easy it is to disprove false rape claims as compared to other crimes, or that the Innocence Project, for whatever reason, focuses on false rape charges. All it really says for certain is that at least 153 people were falsely convicted of rape.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 04:26 AM
5

No. If you accept the premise that 13-year-olds are not mature enough to make their own decisions about sex, then the man took advantage of the girl. If you reject that premise, then it was consensual and therefore nobody is guilty.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:27 PM
2

Probably "most sexist."
/r/MensRights20/03/11 11:54 PM
2

It is the superlative form of sexist. Durr.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 07:41 PM
8

Where Have All The Good Men Gone?
/r/MensRights19/03/11 07:27 PM
2

That's not what I get from the article. Point 1 specifically seems to be about working hard to develop your talents.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 04:36 PM
7

Mmhm. Though I tend to agree with the point of the article, linking to white supremicist webpages doesn't really do good things for the credibility of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 05:47 AM
6

A lot of what this article says rings true to me (and I believe I've heard of many of the studies he makes reference to), but it could really use references. Also, I don't think it's true to say that rape culture doesn't exist, but that it exists in small pockets of society rather than representing a societal norm.
/r/MensRights28/01/11 09:48 PM
17

I can see where you're coming from; in a general context this is a poor way to judge women, and it's unfortunate that the author felt the need to use shaming language. In the context of dating and relationships, however, compassion and devotion are highly desirable. I think this goes equally for men and women.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 05:20 PM
1

I am afraid to click on the "sexually explicit photos" link.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 01:35 PM
10

While this has a kernel of truth to it, some folks with low paying jobs simply live frugally.
/r/MensRights04/12/10 05:25 PM
3

Why does /MR need to be a male-only space? If this subreddit were devoted to complaining about ex-girlfriends, that would make sense. Men in that situation want emotional validation rather than rational discussion. However, this sub is supposedly about rights issues. There should be room for dissent. There is no need to view every discussion as a battle in the war of the sexes. There are batshit insane feminists, but there are also batshit insane MRAs. Discussions of feminism and men's rights bo…
/r/MensRights01/12/10 04:47 PM
13

Are you really equating mainstream feminism with this tripe?
/r/MensRights26/11/10 03:45 AM
5

A very small minority of men rule the world. It's insulting to say "man up" or "be a man" to imply that the feelings or rights of men don't matter.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 03:36 PM
4

The rules of a relationship are made by those in the relationship. If "getting it elsewhere" seems like a reasonable fix to the sexually rejected partner, the couple should discuss the possibility. Like anything else, if a disagreement arises, and one partner sees the issue as criticial enough, s/he could certainly decide to break off the relationship.
/r/MensRights10/07/10 01:04 PM
27

And? Assuming there are good reasons for wanting a divorce, waiting until there are no kids in the house seems like a reasonable thing to do.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 04:47 PM
2

It's not a failure for feminism because these successful women can't get a man. I'm wondering which is the main contributing factor in this: women not being interested in less successful men or men being intimidated by more successful women.
/r/MensRights17/06/10 12:25 AM
16

Huh? I've generally enjoyed the perspective that cryptogirl and erszebet_b have added to the discussion (I'm not familiar with the other two, but they didn't seem to say anything particularly horrible in the referenced comments). It's nice to have outspoken ladies around to prevent this subreddit from becoming an emotionally driven circle-jerk.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 04:01 PM
2

Awesome! I've been wanting to go up to a C cup.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 03:47 PM
5

No they were not, but I would guess that the risk of death in giving birth several times was comparable to that of working a dangerous job every day.
/r/MensRights27/05/10 03:59 AM
5

That statement was used. erszebet_b's argument was that women were indeed oppressed in the past, which is very different from the argument you're accusing her of making.
/r/MensRights26/05/10 07:11 PM
6

My point is that it isn't an injustice that men were risking their lives disproportionately to make money, when women were assuming all of the risk inherent in child birth. Now that I read your comment again, though, perhaps you weren't arguing that it was an injustice.
/r/MensRights26/05/10 07:06 PM
5

I don't think erszebet_b was claiming that she never mentioned past inequality. You claim that there are people who think past grievances are still relevant to today's situation, to which I believe she was objecting. I don't understand why you're giving a nod to the context of her comment, while at the same time your condemnation seems to completely ignore it, which was merely her response to this comment by theozoph: Since I don't believe "oppression" comes even close to describe the status of …
/r/MensRights26/05/10 06:26 PM
5

men were risking their lives on a daily basis to feed their families To be fair, child-bearing used to be quite dangerous as well.
/r/MensRights26/05/10 06:07 PM
3

This is very anecdotal, and more of a question than an answer. Anyhow, a chubby lady I know, when she goes to a physician, often gets a dismissive reaction to whatever her symptoms she's feeling, given that she would be healthier if she lost weight. As a chubby fellow myself, physicians tend to mention my weight and its correlation with my symptoms, but I see the intent more as informative than dismissive or shaming. I'm not sure if this is a case of worse treatment of women, or simply a worse r…
/r/MensRights25/05/10 07:57 PM
3

Damn. I thought it was going to be Liono-o from Thundercats.
/r/MensRights16/05/10 03:24 PM
1

Please link to what you're parodying.
/r/MensRights29/04/10 03:40 PM
7

That's silly. Watching rape porn is entirely victimless. It's spending money on rape porn that's the problem.
/r/MensRights30/03/10 06:09 PM
-9

Sounds like a good reason to hit a bitch.
/r/MensRights20/03/10 06:07 AM
1

Every man has a right to two girlfriends. This is a step in the right direction. </troll>
/r/MensRights15/03/10 05:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter