TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jesseomgwtf Archive

View 2 posts and 39 comments by jesseomgwtf on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
38

***LOCKED***jesseomgwtf/r/RedPillWomen03/01/16 04:10 PM
3

Discussionjesseomgwtf/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:08 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Nope and nope. This discussion is over because you are being ridiculous by assuming that the children of people in poly households will be socially retarded and/or shunned.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 11:18 PM
1

Again, these concerns could be handled inside of a framework of RP theory, and my question is about why it never has been (while plenty of other scenarios, even "non-traditional" ones, have been).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 10:43 PM
1

There's nothing degenerate about it when it's done responsibly, and the social reject part doesn't really apply when you're only being rejected by people you don't care about anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 10:42 PM
1

Sure they could find a single relationship. They could also buy a puppy. But that's not what I'm talking about here. A lot of people seem to be starting with the premise that things are always worse for a woman in a MFF[FF...] type of arrangement than in a MF arrangement without even taking into consideration that it depends on the woman, the quality of the man, and a lot of other factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:20 PM
1

And what about the number of guys who want to have multiple women who live with them, love them and who are loyal to the group without getting screwed over? There's absolutely nothing out there for them right now, which is my point: I'm asking why the theory has never been even slightly developed. You'd think that someone, somewhere would have explored this in a lot of detail by now.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:18 PM
1

The unicorn-hunting aspect of it is definitely an issue, and a big part of relationship-minded RP game for a man is being a strong leader that handles women in a healthy way, not someone who falls all to hell. While selecting the right women is a big part of it, it's also important to be able to handle those women well once you have them around. Also, I think harem is a bit of a loaded word for this type of household. I'd also say that the "sister wives" concept is loaded with a lot of baggage t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 12:17 PM
1

There are a lot of benefits that a MFF[FF...] family has over a MF family like always having an abundance of adults to watch kids, a more efficient income:expense ratio, a larger support system for the kids if one adult dies or is incapacitated, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 11:14 PM
1

Naturally it's easy for women to get sex and not as easy to get commitment from the type of man they want, etc etc. Men also don't want low SMV women. Combine that, and you get the body of theory I'm asking about: Men who acquire multiple, high-SMV women who are committed to him (and each other) only.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 09:31 PM
1

MFF[FF...] is the most natural pairing, and there's nothing inherently wrong with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 09:30 PM
1

For what it's worth, monogamy is relatively new for human beings. It's definitely not something that's been active for thousands of years on a global level. Around the time of the agricultural revolution, the reproductive pairing has been proven to have been something in the neighborhood of 15-20 women per 1 man.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 08:55 PM
0

Sorry but "real" poly doesn't have to be open.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 01:58 AM
0

Thank you for your reply. I guess I'm talking about a completely closed relationship between the three (or more) in a MFF(F...) group.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:11 PM
1

I can understand feeling like that, but the idea of spinning plates seems inapproachable by a lot of guys, and that is well within their grasp now. I figure that if the theory was developed out like other branches of RP theory has been, that more men could learn and eventually get there as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:10 PM
1

I can understand the unrealistic and unstable labels dissuading people from trying to develop theory around this. To me, it seems like this wouldn't have stopped people from doing it anyway because the idea of some beta BP nerd getting his shit together and learning what he needs to learn to develop an abundance mentality and start pulling tail seems unrealistic as well if you don't see it work. The cultural issue is a really interesting one to me that I've thought about a lot on this topic beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:08 PM
0

If we followed that logic, then no one would study or advance RP theory at all because such a small percentage of people are actually RP. I agree that it's a small percentage of people, but I still wonder why it's not something that has been pushed because it seems like it would be the relationship-minded TRP holy grail.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:52 PM
1

Somewhat off-topic, but normalized one woman/multiple men (ie: woman/alpha fux/beta bux/beta bux-...) seems like the perfect endgame for feminism and the direction society is going, and I'll be surprised if we don't start seeing a big public push for that in the future. Ugh. Along these lines, I do not think that this fits in with TRP in the least bit. I agree that the advice of TRP is more tailored to maintaining 1-1 relationships, even if there are multiple 1-1 relationships being maintained a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:49 PM
1

I'm speaking of the people, of which there are plenty, who are not interested in a LTR and the fact that TRP fully condones this (as it should imo).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:45 PM
1

I wouldn't say it's not feasible, but I do agree of your assessment of most people who support poly using shaming tactics. This kind of gets back to the baggage that the term poly (and the overwhelming, vast majority of that community) brings. Before I knew this sub existed, I asked some pro-poly people about it, and they basically shit all over the concept of the women not being able to go out and bone whoever (I'm sure this ties in with open hypergamy in today's society), whenever they felt li…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:43 PM
1

I agree that TRP is largely against relationships (for completely logical reasons), but there is still a strong segment of relationship-minded and marriage-minded theory that's been developed. I'm curious to know why the theory for multiple females in the type of arrangement I've described hasn't been developed further. I also agree that it's culturally taboo, and that's something that I've thought about as well. What gets me about that particular line of thought is that red pill theory has been…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:38 PM
1

I think I was unclear the first time I asked, and I apologize for that. Let me ask this way: What is gross about a household of a male and two females who have no outside sex partners? I realize poly is probably a terrible descriptor for this arrangement because of the baggage it has for people pretty much going out and screwing whoever they feel like it, but I don't have a better term.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:35 PM
1

I appreciate your reply. Let me address a few points and ask a few questions. TRP is traditionalist in a lot of ways, but there's nothing traditionalist about spinning plates non-stop with no end in sight, something that TRP (logically) recommends in light of the current status of marriage. I'm not sure how households with a conventional male/female couple are more stable when most marriages end in divorce. Along similar lines, people and relationships in general tend to be shit shows of instabi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:33 PM
1

I don't disagree. I'm curious to know why the subject (or even as a goal for an individual man to have) doesn't come up all that often. It just seems like it would have at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:23 PM
1

A lot of women would not be okay with it, and there's nothing wrong with that, but that doesn't mean that there aren't good women who would. I'm looking at why it's never discussed. Even Mystery back in the day was looking for a MFF committed household, and regardless of how that worked out, it's just weird to me that it's not really brought up much (if ever).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:22 PM
2

I made a ninja edit before I saw your comment, but I'm asking specifically about having everyone living together and there being no outside sources of sex/intimacy/etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:20 PM
0

Could you elaborate? I made a ninja edit before I saw your comment, but I'm asking specifically about having everyone living together and there being no outside sources of sex/intimacy/etc. Sorry about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:18 PM
10

Let it happen organically when she catches women looking at you, etc. Anything else comes across as tryhard.
/r/MarriedRedPill31/01/16 03:08 PM
2

I had a close friend in a very similar situation. I paid for her to have a girl at a salon teach her what she needed to know and to figure out what she should use. It worked out really well and was extremely cost effective.
/r/RedPillWomen09/01/16 01:24 PM
3

If he makes significantly more than her, which is the most likely outcome in their situation, then he's still on the hook for a significant portion of alimony in North Carolina. Skimming a summary of the law and then acting like an expert isn't really going to help anyone in this situation. As far as trusting her goes, he trusts her a lot less now that she has went against something she's said for the past five years.
/r/RedPillWomen08/01/16 04:20 PM
3

Where in the world did you get the idea that he wants her not working or working very little? He put her through school so that she could take care of herself if something happened to him. He's been very active in helping her to find a job after she's graduated. Where are you coming up with all of this stuff that doesn't apply to this situation at all? I just want to point out that her being married to the guy wouldn't change this "she owes him nothing" mentality either. Moreover, your reply is …
/r/RedPillWomen08/01/16 02:41 PM
5

Minor Update: She's started trying to withhold sex the past couple of days. He's pretty repulsed by her behavior and is re-considering his future with her. One major issue here is that he's giving her exactly the level of commitment she said she wanted and was content with. If she lied about that (which she apparently did), then that's not his fault. It's not his job to use his psychic powers to mind read this woman, and it's not his job to compromise his integrity (by going against something he…
/r/RedPillWomen08/01/16 01:01 PM
4

He doesn't have to think that she would do it to see the value in protecting himself against the possibility of it. Plenty of men have gotten married thinking that their significant other would never do that to them and found out they were wrong. It would be pure arrogance to assume that he was too smart to have a chance to become one of them.
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/16 03:43 PM
5

I don't disagree with your assessment. However, his logic is that women can initiate divorce for any reason (or no reason) in his state (North Carolina for reference), and this puts him at an unnecessary risk. In terms of fair monetary protection and advancing her interests, he's put her through school, which she wouldn't have been able to do without him, and put a lot of time and work into helping her to build her own business, which is to the point that she could support herself if she had to.…
/r/RedPillWomen05/01/16 12:40 AM
7

A comment that my friend made about the situation was that he almost felt like the past 5+ years had been wasted because he'd invested so much time and resources into someone who didn't want the future with him that she agreed to and that he'd been building from the start.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/16 10:33 PM
5

I just want to note that this is correct. He's against becoming legally married period to anyone.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/16 07:45 PM
7

Along those lines, what do you think of him putting his leadership, financial backing and protection out there for a woman who thinks none of those things would be important enough to stay with him?
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/16 07:37 PM
13

I think it's completely reasonable for a woman to decide she doesn't want to cohabitate. In terms of the covert contract aspect of the situation, I agree. He's been clear from the beginning that he intends on never being married, and years down the road, now she's trying to pressure him into it. One issue that's coming up for him is that, from his perspective, he feels hurt that everything he's done for her essentially means nothing if he doesn't do something he told her from the beginning that …
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/16 06:32 PM
5

I told him more or less the same thing about the logical vs emotional side of things. My advice to him is centered on the idea that there might be a chance that he could satisfy her emotions in other ways, especially if there was something specific that was bothering her about the situation. For what it's worth, I've also suggested to him ways he can protect himself legally while getting married (along the lines of avoiding the ways that pre-nups are commonly thrown out, asset protection etc.), …
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/16 06:28 PM
5

Thank you for your reply. We've already looked into that, and there is no common law marriage in his state.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/16 04:46 PM
4

The lack of tact with this question and how it's been presented is definitely palpable. If OP is trying to ask a question because he (presumably this is a man) is trying to learn what to do, then he should ask for advice in a better way.
/r/RedPillWomen03/01/16 02:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter