| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 | Just feminists explaining why its okay for women to have choices, but men get obligations ("Financial Abortions")She uses the phrase "bodily autonomy" as a buzzword and a philosophical bludgeon without thinking about what the phrase actually entails. To ease her cognitive dissonance, she elevates pregnancy to the category of "bodily autonomy" but relegates every other conscious parental action to some less important realm. In reality, there is no type of autonomy or freedom that isn't "bodily." What the hell would that even mean? Non-corporeal autonomy? When a man is forced to work for 18 years for a child… | /r/MensRights | 28/06/13 01:39 PM |
| 19 | Suggesting that biological differences between the sexes could make one sex, on average, superior to the other in specific ways is perfectly fine only if women are on the winning side.Quite a bit of evidence shows that men have a wider distribution of intelligence than women. If true, this cuts both ways. Yes, we would expect men to dominate the fields of study that require a high IQ, but we would also expect men to outnumber women in activities for which a low IQ is a strong predicting factor, like crime and violence. We should take care to avoid the hypocrisy that has blinded some feminist groups. I see quite a lot of information on this subreddit that attempts to show that… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/13 10:40 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter