TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jetpilot87 Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by jetpilot87 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Its a way to not waste time, sure. This is a seduction sub though, theres nothing seductive about a "sex or leave" ultimatum. I also do believe the commenter cared about whether he got sex or not, thats why he literally wanted the girl to leave if he didn't get sex. Nothing wrong with knowing what you want and going for it, and likewise recognizing incompatibilities, but if you don't care about being/acting attractive, good luck out there.
/r/seduction19/05/25 08:05 PM
24

You didn't just state what you want, you gave her an ultimatum.
/r/seduction19/05/25 03:32 PM
23

I had a woman tell me she didn’t want to be seen as a slut when she came over. I told her she needed to go if we’re not going to have sex, and we ended up having sex. This is very needy, and shows the "success" of your night was heavily outcome-dependent. You want to practice outcome independence if you're talking about maintaining a strong frame. Confidence comes from letting someone be/do what they want without letting it threatening your own self-worth. Personally I would have just said someo…
/r/seduction19/05/25 03:25 PM
2

I overall liked the book, this wasn’t one of main takeaways. I do think someone misunderstanding this could be dangerous, (ie. going in for a kiss on a “hope” she’s into it, or gets into it). Maybe it was just a poor choice of words, I prefer the interpretation you can’t let yourself sit in the friend-zone, and you need to make your sexual interest known. Not a fan of chasing though.
/r/seduction09/09/22 10:33 PM
11

He was far from the first to do that, and that’s not why he’s getting banned from social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 05:18 PM
0

I think that guy is an over-correction. Overall it will hurt the movement, overshadow the areas that are more moderate and beneficial to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 05:10 PM
2

Not sure how this is different from what I am saying or what OP is asking. Maybe you did not understand my comment or you do not understand our viewpoint/experiences. You also contradict yourself saying you would fuck a pretty fool, but that women value babies and only men value sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/22 02:46 PM
15

I lean RP but do think there’s validity to your claim and worth considering. Devil’s advocate might say she’s still more physically attractive to the quick-sex guys, and only the “whole package”material wins her over. While some would argue it’s not physically possible for some guys, I think the goal is to try and become the best of both worlds. Find someone who is physically attracted to you AND wants to have your kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/22 10:30 PM
1

This is one of the big questions, and hard to answer. Can sex be just as good or better based on non-physical attributes? As OP attests, I think for guys, definitely. While for women it probably varies, a lot out there leads men to believe physical attraction matters more. But, there is also that attitude of a “Chad” (non-physical) that usually goes along with said looks, that increases the attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 08:48 PM
2

The question for me becomes, even if you are not the physically hottest guy she has dated, can your "whole package" (no pun intended), get her attraction to you be on par with previous, more solely, alpha partners. RP assumes NO. Regardless of the debate, I think the solution is to work to have strong aspects of both types of guys, and verify in the beginning she is sexually attracted to you before anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 11:15 PM
5

And what would happen if she went into a LTR with the guy who made her feel sparks? Would she perpetually feel those sparks 5 years, 10 years down the road after living together and having kids and being married? Is he THAT awesome? Loss of passion is partly symptom of LTRs and familiarity between 2 people, not only because she settled with a more stable guy. Now, if she never had a spark with the guy she settled with, even in the beginning, then yes, I agree thats an issue and unfair to the guy…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 10:49 PM
3

I think you need to clarify " a guy you're not as physically attracted to " Overall attraction is comprised of multiple things, regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 10:31 PM
1

Not trying to defend high-n men, I think it’s good you have your standards and know what you what. Im trying to make a point since I think some of your logic is flawed, but you have your viewpoints and I have mine. To each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 02:22 AM
1

I don't think you're a liar at all, and everyone is entitled to their standards and its good to have them and know what is important to you. I think its an inaccurate statement to say someone's past values are a measure of their current values, and therefore not the best indicator of present values matching. But you have every right to disqualify someone based on your judgement of their past. And is it really hypocrisy to try and teach your kids not to make the same mistakes you did when you wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 06:55 PM
1

My n-count is 1, and I didn’t want a man with casual sex in his past, because it suggests he has dramatically different values than me. If it's in his past, then what if his values have changed? A lot of people grow up and start to value different things as they get older. Both genders. People love to use the values argument to justify disqualifying someone because of their past, but it's a less strong argument if we are not strictly compare present values. I think a more accurate statement woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 08:00 PM
1

Where’s your source for the stat then? Check out these articles that explain it more: https://www.kqed.org/science/11450/new-dna-studies-debunk-misconceptions-about-paternal-relationships https://dnatesting.com/30-of-men-not-the-father/ And I agree whatever the true number is , is still too high.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 08:33 PM
1

Nope, you are misunderstanding the statistic. You think it’s between 3 and 10% of all men. It’s between 3 and 10% of men who already had doubt and needed to get a paternity test, (like if they were not serious with their partner and they knew the woman were seeing multiple people) So the initial statistic is misleading.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 08:13 PM
1

Data has shown between 3% and 10% of men are raising children that unknowing are not theres. This stat is missing important context. It’s not between 3% and 10% of all men, it’s men who had a reason to take a paternity test in the first place. In other words, when there was doubt to begin with. So those numbers are wrong and it’s not as bad as your think.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 03:14 PM
1

Data has shown between 3% and 10% of men are raising children that unknowing are not theres. This stat is missing important context. It’s not between 3% and 10% of all men, it’s men who had a reason to take a paternity test in the first place. In other words, when there was doubt to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 03:09 PM
0

I agree with comments that point out the solution is to have traits of both, leading to win-win for everyone. Then, the benefit of having some provider qualities is you could really lock down that girl you connect with physically and sexually as well. While I agree "choreplay" isn't really going to turn a woman on the way we want, and just being a good provider isn't enough, its overly simplistic to say being a good husband can't ever turn a women on sexually. I think it can really complement a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 05:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter