TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jfartster Archive

View 0 posts and 95 comments by jfartster on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

He went to protect his face with hands - she stabbed him in the hand and forearm. She was going for his face/head.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 03:12 AM
7

I seem to remember a few girls being allowed in the scouts when I was a kid (in the late 90s, Australia). And personally, I liked that. So it strikes me as odd/hypocritical in this supposedly progressive, inclusive time that a few boys wouldn't be allowed into the girl scouts. That said, I'd have no problem with the girl scouts being just for girls either. But then it's back to the problem, why are girls-only spaces sacred and necessary and boys-only spaces are regressive and misogynistic? And t…
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:14 AM
2

Yep. That article does not say what the op says it does. There's still plenty of room to talk about gender disparity in how that would be applied etc. But the article says it's not talking about blanket banning prosecution of all vulnerable women (let alone all women), because even vulnerable women can commit gang-related crimes willingly.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 12:09 AM
2

I don't think logic and reason should be abandoned - not at all, critical thinking is precious, obviously. (Not that anyone's suggesting it, but insofar as the rest of my comment:) But I think, for the people on the other side of the fence, it's been usurped by another style of thinking. Where the truth is found by stories and things that get repeated, cliches, the way people feel etc. If they can find stats or facts to back those things up, that's a bonus. But really that's secondary. So, it's …
/r/MensRights18/07/23 01:31 AM
2

Her kids are 5 and 7. She travelled with her two-month old the first time she went first-class. On a separate occasion. And I guarantee she didn't get any funny looks for being a woman in first-class as she claims, that's ridiculous (everybody feels self-conscious doing something like for the first time). But she says it was "life-altering" - that's true. Do it once and you'll absolutely want to do it again if you can. That's all that happened here, nothing to do with feminism. I hope her husban…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:54 AM
3

True, it's weird to think of it as a "market". But then again, if you meet someone that shares your interest, and you enjoy their company, you can form bonds and maybe have a future. People have options, but they've gotta remember it's all about equity these days.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/23 02:33 AM
5

"Do you even left, bro?" Sorry, I don't mean to make light of serious stuff. Your ability to write a compelling, succinct and fair comment is only matched by the job you do on these slideshows. It really is top-notch - I just couldn't help notice that little bit o' funny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/23 10:47 AM
7

"80% of violent crimes are committed by men" =/= 80% of men are going to commit a violent crime!! Also, that comment about "She was in fear for her life, which you wouldn't understand because of your privilege". That bugs me. For one, it goes against their own logic, which accepts that more men are victims of violent crime (so there's higher chance that any given man has trauma from being a victim than a woman and a better chance they would understand that fear). But also, people like this seem …
/r/MensRights16/01/23 12:41 AM
1

Yeah, that's so true. Didn't really think about it before, but you could interpret power in a lot of different ways. And play on that.. if you were so inclined.. to define people as more or less powerful when that might not really mean anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/23 10:45 AM
1

Yep, I get ya. Just intuitively, if power is associated with "wife battering" (and you'd assume it is a lot of the time..?), then you'd think it would be just as much associated with husband battering. Ngl, I'm not sure I fully understand the difference between a direct relationship and an associated risk factor. I guess, a direct relationship is more causal maybe (?), but a risk factor isn't necessarily? ^ Anyway, so on that basis don't take my comments too seriously (I don't understand this st…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/23 10:44 AM
8

I'm confused about "No direct relationship exists between power and violence within couples". I thought wow... that is not what I imagined at all. I thought at least some of the time (like 25% of the time maybe) there would be one more powerful partner - that whole coercive control thing. But then in the comment it says "power and control IS a characteristic" of both male and female abuse. So - is abuse different to violence? Am I not understanding what a "direct relationship" is between power a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/23 01:00 AM
13

"Like, it wasn't not written by a thirteen year old? If that makes sense?" - Author's response
/r/MensRights08/01/23 01:56 AM
1

Thank you for that. And sorry for this late reply. Yeah, I do get what you're saying - you summed it up perfectly. Thanks for that, I appreciate it.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:22 AM
1

Yeah, fair enough. I mean, my first thought is (in trying to defend my case here!) - maybe you were seeing the more extreme cases. Like, the more violent/aggressive anger-prone type people tend to be the ones who might end up in a psychiatric facility (?) But then, you were probably also seeing the people that were most likely to fulfill a suicide attempt. And those are the people we're talking about. (I assume, anyway - it could always be that the obvious angry guys are actually less likely to …
/r/MensRights29/11/22 01:28 PM
2

Rage or potentially harmful behaviours. Is it just me that balks a little at this? I hear it a lot - usually something to the effect of: "men process emotions differently, instead of being X, they'll show anger or rage". How common is this really?? As a man, I can't relate to it at all (and I've attempted suicide etc. like I'm sure a lot of people have). Not to saying it doesn't ever happen; that a suicidal impulse can't manifest that way. I've seen really fucked up people - like deeply disturbe…
/r/MensRights29/11/22 08:07 AM
-9

I don't care. I get so much out of it that I don't mind some of the bullshit. Still happy to donate a couple of bucks for the 95% of time I find it useful, even with shitty articles like this.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 03:38 AM
1

My thoughts too, it's the same argument.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 01:55 AM
5

Okay. So you're talking more about women being harassed, which is fair. That's psycho behaviour. So yeah, I can see how that's a more justified fear. At least intuitively, I can imagine that potentially happening much more often than violence, which is what I was thinking of (I think because of the comment I responded to and the Bundy stuff). I mean, my point was that even if you can't tell which men are psychos, the chance that any man you choose to compliment will be a psycho is very, very low…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 12:28 PM
-5

I dunno man... Men wanting to see males as well as females modelling clothes is just as important an issue as women being murdered in Iran or abortion being outlawed.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 08:08 AM
22

This is the thing. The women here talk about how dangerous men are and that women feel afraid all the time. I have sympathy for women feeling afraid. But when it's an irrational, unjustified fear... (Like, you seriously think male psycho murderers are so common there's a good chance any given man you talk to will turn out to be one??). That part just grates me a little, it's like.. get real. And your point addresses the second comment very well. If people's actions were dictated by the actual da…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 07:27 AM
2

For sure. (Also on the falling asleep and blurry details, that happens to me a lot too lol). But yeah I agree, like in some situations it really undermines women and the power they do have by pretending that they have the capacity of children even though they're grown adults. Exactly how you said, women who buy into that must feel weak and like victims. Another thing that just popped into my head, can't remember if this was mentioned, but I'm curious about financial motivations with this stuff. …
/r/MensRights15/10/22 12:33 AM
5

A lot of the time it feels like people are way more interested in reinforcing their own beliefs rather than finding the truth. And it sucks how often people would rather act in bad faith and misrepresent the opinions of others so they can argue against them. So, I really respect her honesty. And it's usually a good sign (imo) when doc-filmmakers find their opinions conflicted or changed after exploring a subject. In fairness, it's pretty easy to see only information that supports the feminist vi…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:27 AM
8

I find that about Andrew O'Keefe to be particularly disgusting. I knew he's had addiction problems (and I'm not one to criticise for that). But I didn't know about the domestic violence and beating women stuff. He's always come across as a bit of a soulless, phony, slimy character, I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking that. And I can totally see him being adversarial towards Cassie just for his image and woke points. But that's to be expected. Being the head of a feminist foundation against DV whi…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:15 AM
2

That's "the kind of power that's denied, obscured and forcefully removed from" everybody in a civilised society!! For good reason, it's a horrible way to behave.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 05:06 AM
1

Oh, okay. They actually changed their procedures/policies? You get my point though - from the article/s, it looks to me like the wording of a generic PR tweet they sent was used to create a misleading headline (that they now prioritise women - when the only concrete thing they said was that they would prioritise anyone in danger, including women). But yeah, show me that they actually changed their procedures, or that they prioritise women, or said they would, I'll happily believe it.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 02:30 AM
3

Did they actually change anything though? I can't tell if that second article is based on exactly the same tweet response included in the first article: "Where there is any concern raised by the customer, they receive the highest level of care and priority". ie. Their policy was always to prioritise anyone who raised concerns about safety. The second article just reframes that as "Women are top priority".... when they raise concerns (which was always the policy). What do you think? Anyway - If t…
/r/MensRights21/01/22 03:30 AM
1

No wonder he lost then, he had no evidence! Seems like a major oversight. Evidence has gotta be like, one of the basic things you need to win a court case... I'm sure he'll remember for next time though. Bring some evidence along with his packed lunch ;)
/r/MensRights20/01/22 04:07 AM
2

I mean, I'm sure there was a huge bias in how it was reported (and a huge public bias anyway) and that probably had a lot to do with why the decision went the way it did - especially in the UK. Because at the time, I found it difficult to understand how that ruling could have ben made (I forget the details of it now - like what the Sun or JD had to actually prove - but I remember thinking the judge was crazy). And JD's been stopped at every turn to try and appeal the decision, afaik - which, aga…
/r/MensRights21/10/21 07:16 AM
2

Was she though? I know enough to know that's true, essentially she was the abuser in the relationship. But Johnny Depp lost the case against The Sun didn't he? They found it was fair to call him a wife-beater. That's about all I know, so I might be missing something - I know there was going to be another case, not sure if that's happened yet? So, I would say a big reason is because it hasn't been legally established (I'd love to be wrong though). From everything I've read/looking into, obviously…
/r/MensRights21/10/21 02:37 AM
3

Just from your post, the thing that kind of annoyed me the most was Cinderalla's business - it's like she's virtuous because she's an aspiring entrepreneur. So I was glad to read at the end you talked about "feminist capitalism" (which is a term I haven't actually heard before - and I honestly haven't given it much thought). But it grates against me for some reason. And I'm not exactly sure why! It's like the message is "young women should all aspire to be good at capitalism". Anyway... I assume…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 05:16 AM
1

"She was made the subject of an 18-month community order, ordered to undertake a 30-day rehabilitation programme and handed a night-time curfew". Honestly, that seems like an appropriate punishment to me. Maybe because I'm an ex-drinker who has had my moments in the past, I have sympathy. But basically, she got rowdy with the police. Flashed her tits, rubbed her arse on one of them and spat at the other one - If that's a first offence, I don't think someone should get jail for that. The false al…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 08:42 AM
23

At first I thought it was because she was never actually convicted of raping a minor. So, kind of a technicality that results in a terrible situation. You would think based on his age alone, that it would be legally seen as a rape by default, but...even still. (Edit: Actually, maybe it is seen as a rape, but it doesn't matter somehow). You could almost stretch to seeing that it's sort of a legal loophole that screwed him, if she was never convicted. But that's not even it. In some cases, the wom…
/r/PussyPass04/05/21 02:04 AM
21

If a women's organisation wants to focus on FGM, that's great. But why go out of their way to push the idea that male circumcision is okay?! Why compare them at all? Why make any comment on male circumcision?
/r/MensRights20/04/20 04:43 AM
1

Yeah, exactly.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 08:43 AM
2

I am actually surprised only 1 in 6 men have received unwanted sexual comments or advances, to be honest. Would have thought most men would have been groped, called-at, hit-on, had sexual comments made about them when they didn't want it... at some point. I also don't think that's particularly violent, or a big deal. But if that's how they're defining it... the number actually seems low, to me. I mean, it does say "are affected" so maybe the survey had a time limit, like "in the last 6 months". …
/r/MensRights05/04/20 07:25 AM
4

It's at the expense of people who think the wage gap isn't real. The intended message is 'women get paid less because they are women'.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 09:55 AM
5

Doublethink.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 08:17 AM
2

If you're someone that already deals with social anxiety, this stuff adds a whole other layer that feeds into it and perpetuates it.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 12:07 PM
6

I hope the kid turns out alright. Because this was just sad to read. He's five years old, for fuck's sake. And his bahaviour sounds absolutely normal for a five year old. But in her eyes, he's wrong from the start because he's a boy. And compared to the older girl, he's a liar and pathologically stubborn. I'd go out on a limb and say he's been treated differently and held to a completely different standard than the daughter was/is. That happens to some degree always with first-second born childr…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 11:46 AM
25

most women dont feel victimized when their SO gets a little too handsy even if they dont like it That sounds like sexual harassment that's going unrecognised due to the woman's own internalised misogyny. /s But I agree, this probably isn't that big a deal. It's weird as hell, imo - if you really imagine it happening to you - but it''s not necessarily that big a deal. The point is the double standard though, it's not that men should start victimizing themselves. It's the fact that, yeah, women an…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 11:39 AM
1

Weird that she singles out "fathers" and not just men in general (?). It's just so strangely specific that it makes it kind of obvious that this has more to do with the type of 'fathers' she attracts into her life, than anything to do with fathers in general. (Either that, or men suddenly become bigots when they have kids). Anyway, if you're willing to sell images of yourself and make money from the men you seem to hate, more power to you. Good work if you can get it. But... I can't help but thi…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 10:36 AM
1

I agree with you, it's not unethical to perform abortions. Not sure about the logic (if it's 'human nature', it's not unethical) but I agree with the conclusion.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 02:58 AM
0

"It's not unethical to be what we are" We're a species who performs abortions.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 01:13 AM
1

I'm not saying it's anything to get upset over, but I do think it's healthy that people cringe at this stuff. Because in a very small way, it reinforces "this is what men are supposed to be. This is what women are supposed to be". It's another small message that you should aspire to be the stereotypical example of your gender. And obviously the average woman/man is far more complicated than that (even though on average there's probably some truth in the stereotypes). But I don't think people sho…
/r/MensRights09/10/19 10:15 AM
1

don't press flush and don't look back
/r/MensRights21/07/19 05:37 AM
7

Just one thing maybe worth mentioning, and I'm not totally familiar with the topic, so I could be misled here. But apart from that one article you linked, any other articles about "toxic femininity" seem to be just another angle on why women are victims. When men behave badly it's sometimes said to be because of "toxic masculinity". So I thought "toxic femininity" would be referring to all the times women use their gender status, or the unique position it puts them in, to do toxic things. But it…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/18 06:34 AM
2

"wearing a Suicidal Tendencies t-shirt with the hashtag #StayinAlive" - WTF?? That is in such poor taste. Honestly surprised me, even though I'm vaguely familiar with some of the shit this woman has pulled before.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/18 06:22 AM
2

So when women do physically abuse someone, it's not really abuse (because patriarchy), it's......? Or that means they're not really women? Wondering what the get-out clause is there.... it's always some bullshit
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:48 AM
3

Apologies, I posted the same thing twice by mistake so I deleted one before I realised you'd replied to it. I did see your reply, so hopefully you can see my response. And no, I didn't decide to "try my luck" - I thought that would be pretty patronising. Just trying to be clear, respectful and civil.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:03 PM
12

Surely you're not saying that if it could be shown that Jewish people were, on average, more "greedy" than the rest of the population, "greedy Jewishness" would be an acceptable term in your opinion? I know you're not saying that (unless you are...jesus). But so far that's the only reason you've given against it.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 07:51 PM
8

Yep. I'm tired of this 'don't even joke about it' bullshit. People joke about dark things all the time because some people just appreciate that type of humour. It's not as if this message was intended for public consumption, it was a joke between two people.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 11:57 AM
2

They'd still be within rights to report the death and the circumstances, surely. (?) [Although I already expect there to be a ton of bias in reporting a police screw-up, regardless of this law. But maybe that's just me]. But hmm yeah I'm not 100% sure on this one.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 01:24 PM
1

Yeah, gotcha. That's the kind of thing I was hoping to get at.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 01:16 PM
17

Glad to read this. Because I remember when it happened. It was shocking, the extent to which they barged their way in and publicly humiliated the guy. Based on nothing of substance, as it turns out. So I think this is good. At least the system compensated him to some degree. Because if it didn't, that would be a very worrying precedent to have set - that broadcasted raids, set up like this, are acceptable.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 11:55 AM
13

I don't know. I see it as reigning in the m.media's capacity to violate a person's privacy. I can't really think of a scenario in which it would be a bad thing. Or where it starts to go down that bad road, like with censorship. Can you?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 11:52 AM
19

So wait, forcing sex on someone - is that flirting or rape?? She's right, it's easy to confuse the two. If I wink at a girl, that's rape I'm pretty sure. But tying her down and forcing her to have sex against her will.... I think that's only flirting? Or....no I give up, it's too confusing for me. Just gonna play it safe and avoid eye contact.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 03:37 AM
1

Does an "Oohhh yeah" as in "that feels good" kinda thing, does that count?? No, I s'pose you've gotta stop the moment, lift your head up from her groin or wherever, look her in the eye: "Just some administrative matters, babe, just so we're on the same page.. Do you consent to have sexual intercourse with myself at the current time and location? Can I just get a clear 'yes' or 'no' on that please?" "Yes? Oikayy, kewl beans... Well that's the legal stuff outta the way. Shall we continue with the …
/r/MensRights08/07/18 06:44 PM
3

So I can prosecute the next woman I sleep with who doesn't ask for my consent and hear an enthusiastic "yes"? ...No?? Is that not it? This is demeaning and insulting to every responsible, respectful normal fucking person out there.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 06:38 PM
2

Love the logic, it's like a rebuttal to the argument "but most men aren't violent". Can't argue with that, so instead say men need to do more than stop being violent! So what's something we can apply to all men, not just the violent ones?? Okay..they need to stop being ....silent?!? Oh and fuckin slam dunk it rhymes as well! Perfect! That way we can blame all men for the actions of a few and completely ignore the reality as reflected in actual domestic violence stats. And that rhyme tho...
/r/MensRights02/07/18 08:03 AM
8

It's an opinion piece. I disagree with it, it's bullshit. But even so, I'd rather hold on to the abc for now, thanks. At least it labels it's "fake news" with an "opinion" tag.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 10:14 AM
2

Silly. Men already know how to play guitar.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 12:08 AM
2

I don't know who she is, but is it likely that any of that article is true? It just seems like bait to get people arguing about gender stuff [Or is that already obvious to everyone else except me?]. Let alone the gilbert grape stuff...jesus. That's not the point, I know. The feminism sub's the real joke here. From what I've seen, open discussion is not what that place is about at all.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 06:22 AM
2

So ...the non-feminists sacrificed the same amount of men, with or without being primed by the stereotypes. But the feminists, after being "subliminally" shown the stereotypes sacrificed men more readily? huh... A few other comments mentioned this; but it seems like the stereotypes could potentially reinforce sacrificing and not sacrificing men. I guess that depends on what mood they're in and what aspect of the contradictory narrative feels more convenient in the moment. Save the men = Men more…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:01 PM
6

Maybe it's just me, but I really feel like people have gotten worse with this. Is it just an illusion that 10-15 years ago people weren't quite as bad with this BS? Maybe it's just that I see it on the internet more now than back then. But now it's like, with any serious topic, it's not about making a solid argument. You have to make an argument that, when misinterpreted, still sounds kind of right...to someone who's going to ignore the actual meaning of what you're sayi-...ugh I don't even know…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:42 PM
2

I'm going to sound like an idiot here (wouldn't be the first time..) but just so I understand, they were angry at him for marketing candles to men...? With scents that would supposedly appeal to men? Is that it? I just don't get it from their perspective. Is it that they felt left out, or was it "sexist" to say that those smells appeal to men? Or..? Not expecting a reasonable argument for why, but is it just because the word "man" is in the product name? Cause I can't really see any other reason…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:31 AM
10

Which is why that "I wish that'd happened to me" or "he probably didn't say no" is so ignorant So true. I just want to add - not that it needs to be said, really - but that children aren't fully-formed people psychologically. That's why we should treat minors as not able to give consent. Gender doesn't affect that in any way whatsoever. Obvious stuff, I know, but still... So the implication of treating a male victim abused by a woman differently to a female abused by a man is absolutely disgusti…
/r/MensRights27/05/18 08:57 AM
1

Thanks. I think you're right; it's a shame, that what should be taken as genuine and serious issues are brushed aside because of the negative public perception of the people bringing them up.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:36 PM
2

Thanks for your reply. I take your main point, if the law really is that clear, then so be it. The law is the law. Sure, we can have our opinions on whether we agree with the law, but that's not the point here. So, fair enough. (I'm outside the US as well, so I'm more ignorant of it than most). This part doesn't really matter, but I was a little unclear on the next two things you said : Positive light? This guy is a schyester lawyer trying to make a buck Well...yeah. That doesn't help the appear…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:23 PM
2

Absolutely not a feminist here and I like to think I take men's rights issues seriously. But unless I'm missing something major, your analysis seems spot-on. Regardless of what I think about the wage-gap or lack thereof, suing this group really doesn't paint the men's rights movement in a favorable light. I know the people suing don't represent all MRAs. But that's not necessarily how it will be appear to the average person. "Evil MRAs destroy the attempts of underprivileged women trying to get …
/r/MensRights12/05/18 04:55 PM
6

he may be dumb but he's not a dweeb
/r/MensRights29/04/18 06:12 AM
5

I think people might mean different things when they talk about the wage gap. There's what you mean; a difference in total earnings between men and women. Obviously that exists, no question and there's legitimate reasons for it. I'm just wondering if some people may mean a gap at more of an individual level. Like regular instances of women being paid less than men for the same work. If that's what someone meant by a "wage gap", then it would be fair to say it doesn't exist. I think the first def…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:18 AM
6

Have I got this right? She was saying academic women work too hard, therefore an ad asking for hard workers is biased against women? Just to make sure...cos I had to read that a few times
/r/MensRights24/01/18 06:57 AM
2

Okay, that's fine, no probs.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:38 AM
0

Ugh...You're just being way too touchy in general. But this part I should clear up because I think I see how you're misreading it: Cos it seems like you're saying on the one hand, people don't think she was sober. But then, if she wasn't sober, he could have raped her while she was asleep. First sentence, you did say that. And it's true. Second sentence, was just me drawing a conclusion - I can see how it may have sounded like I was putting words in your mouth there, but that's not what I meant.…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:35 AM
0

yeah alright, alright keep your pants on.... It's just that everyone - including you in your previous comment - are focusing on whether she was drunk, which is mostly irrelevant. You already made it clear nobody's going out to fuck sleeping women, that part's fine. Last few sentences - agree completely.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:20 AM
1

I agree her story doesn't add up. But to me, if she was asleep, it doesn't matter if she was drunk or not. Cos it seems like you're saying on the one hand, people don't think she was sober. But then, if she wasn't sober, he could have raped her while she was asleep. So...then she was raped? So..I don't think it matters if she was drunk or not. Only whether she was asleep. And she's probably saying she wasn't drunk to avoid being blamed, but actually imo, that kind of goes against her. Because li…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 02:28 AM
1

Usually this sub is really reasonable, so maybe I'm missing something. But if she was unconscious, then it seems fair to call that rape. If fucking unconscious women is acceptable now, then count me out... Or is everyone just assuming that part's bs? I mean, it's hard to believe her story - she claims she wasn't drunk, but somehow he managed to penetrate her without waking her up = that's hard to believe. Is that what people are assuming/reacting to?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:07 AM
1

I think that's an intuition for physics rather than intuition for aiming projectiles, tbh.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:41 AM
3

Learning how to solve theoretical projectile motion problems is completely different to using intuition to aim balls ...orpee etc. Eg. Take a bunch of footballers with excellent aim and without teaching them how, ask them to solve a theoretical projectile motion problem. They haven't got much of a hope. Males might be generally more adept at the maths involved. And males might be more adept at physically aiming and throwing things. But those are two quite different skills. Understanding the phys…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 07:32 AM
2

Summed up perfectly. Honest to god, I'm not exaggerating when I say it's a shame ^ that your last comment is in an ancient (I day old) chain so a lot of people will miss it. I knew there was something in the back of my mind as I was writing before (!); and that's it, the similarity to politics these days. It sounds really old-mannish, but it's hard not to see these things as all linked. Our dwindling attentions spans as the result of internet culture (mine included) means - like you say - no mat…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 11:22 AM
2

You're very understanding and easygoing about it - which is definitely the best way to be (!). I agree mostly with what you're saying. just see it slightly differently right now, so I may as well just mention what thoughts your comment inspired. I think it forces us all to make our comments unequivocally clear. People need to know which side you're on!! Which is stupid. I think when people can't grasp subtlety and nuances, it shows a low level of intelligence - I know I sound like a dick here, b…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 08:46 AM
7

I'm normally the last person crying for harsh punishments, in general. But there needs to be a strong deterrent against false rape claims. The message needs to be that there are serious consequences.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 10:54 PM
2

Don't you hate that? The thumbs down just discourage intelligent discussion. Sure, I can understand someone being sooo outraged by an opinion that they have to thumb it down. But when you clearly say the "devil's advocate" opinion isn't even yours, all the downvotes don't exactly shout intelligent, rational discussion. It shits me. So downvote away..(if anyone actually reads this)
/r/MensRights10/09/17 10:50 PM
1

Oh, ok.. weird
/r/MensRights31/08/17 12:45 AM
1

It's like the average male build (according to television) is way more muscular than real life. So the buff guys are gigantic thor types and the nerds are just normal athletic/buff guys.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 12:30 AM
1

Yeah, true. And I should have said, half the time the nerdy guy is just another buff dude wearing glasses, anyway.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 11:52 PM
6

Just as a sidenote and only my opinion here, but men in TV shows and the media generally are way more muscular, buff, athletic etc. than they used to be. I mean, they practically all are unless they're specifically a nerdy character. It's really getting to a ridiculous and almost unnatural level imo, compared to previous decades. So I'm just speculating here, that I'd guess now more than ever young guys would be especially prone to body image issues. If a guy takes the average tv/film star as a …
/r/MensRights30/08/17 07:52 AM
14

Op, I think it might be from the expression 'beating a dead horse'...
/r/MensRights29/08/17 04:11 AM
24

So it was totally unrelated to the hernia procedure? That's so weird that he would even do that, or think it's acceptable.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 09:40 AM
10

Honestly and openly reading or listening to someone's argument - especially if you disagree with it - and trying to understand what they're actually saying, is something I consider a pretty fking basic adult skill. Clearly, a lot of people don't or can't do this - and we've all met them, but it does blow my mind a little bit how common this is, and how blind those people are to what they're doing. It's a mental maturity thing. And it's absolutely rife among feminists, fwiw. (From what I've seen …
/r/MensRights12/08/17 04:41 AM
4

Seems to me, all he wants is for this "violence against women" program (whatever it is) to be successful by being based on accurate information. It just seems to me, that feminist types (I don't know how else to describe them) are so used to bullshitty make-it-up-as-you-go reasoning, they're not in the practice of looking at reality, and then solving the problem. They make up their own wishy-washy reality, and then go from there. This just seems a perfect example of that, imo.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:08 AM
3

Being sole arbiter of what is and isn't sexist? A woman's sacrament. Couldn't have said it better.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 09:19 AM
35

Haha Love it. Men first = they're higher status. Women first = they're weaker. If every possible combination is a problem for you, then maybe you're the problem.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 06:01 PM
7

So...the term refers to a social dynamic where a woman wants to be friends with a guy, but it's implied that he wants a romantic relationship. Or vice versa with the genders, but usually not. Yeah? There's nothing inherently misogynistic about the words themselves, so maybe it's the situation they describe that feminists take issue with? But there's nothing misogynistic about the situation, so feminists have to misinterpret the term and give it a negative connotation. So, I think they interpret …
/r/MensRights22/07/17 06:27 PM
3

Also, wealthy families have a lower infant mortality rate, so we should really only save poor men last. Leave them behind with the disabled and the mentally ill, strap them down if you have to. It's for equality. And don't forget, labour intensive jobs don't suit women "coz periods" lol
/r/MensRights21/07/17 07:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter