TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jgzman Archive

View 0 posts and 105 comments by jgzman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Hit them with a logical paradox.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/22 02:32 PM
2

There are other ways to work out if they’re that kind of person though, Oh, sure. Not as quick and clear, but also not going to piss anyone off. It's a question of what you prefer. And if someone prefers a quick, clear answer that is terribly rude, that gives you a useful data point for dealing with them.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 06:52 PM
6

That's my understanding. In theory, it's the same for guys, but in practice, usually not.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 04:01 PM
1

Yeah, that's why they often fail, it's like telling someone puns when they don't like puns. If someone dosn't like puns, treat them like someone who has no books.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 03:38 PM
0

Regardless of whether this is fake, I’ve seen some girls promoting the idea that you should shoot men down to see how they react.. this is so deluded and such a product of our ‘everything through a screen’ culture. Given some of the shit I've read about how guys often react to rejection, this actually seems like a fairly logical thing to do. If a guy reacts to a polite rejection by blowing up on you, that's something you want to know. Of course, it completely ignores the guy's feelings, and sabo…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 03:37 PM
3

I thought people didnt really care about conversation and just looks when looking to fuck My understanding is that unless a guy is stunningly hot, he needs to show that he's also entertaining, even for a one-night-stand. Or otherwise do something to stand out from the 30 other options.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 03:33 PM
11

Had it been a polite rejection, I might accept this. She now has an extra data point to work with (which is that I'm not gonna lose my shit for no reason) which is in my favor, and I now have two new data points to work with, which is in her favor. But with that rejection, no, I'm not interested.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 03:31 PM
-1

A subreddit that doesnt think you are special because you are born with girl parts thinks that you are special because youre black? SWELL. No, we think there is a pattern of people assuming that the black person is guilty of a crime. Any crime. Pick a crime, there's a black person guilty of it.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/21 08:51 PM
2

defied the presidents recommendations up till March What recommendations were these?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 12:44 AM
1

It's amazing the stupid shit people will say or do for a chance of some strange beave I think we refer to the collection of such acts as "civilization."
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/20 01:56 PM
47

I do not. What's the difference?
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:01 PM
111

I filed for child support from my ex in December 2019. Los Angeles County bounced it around for 5 months. Sending me documents that supported my ex for receiving child support. I filed a request for a hearing and they denied my request for a hearing. This was after I was treated like a criminal every time I entered the LA CSS offices. I'm still waiting for the issue to come in front of a judge.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:12 PM
2

Our college dorms have separate but mixed gendered bathroom on each floor. Because of this I often see women who live on floors with only mens bathroom come in to mens one instead of going another floor down or up to use women's just because it's convenient. I think it's pretty unfair because I've never seen guys do the same even when one of them were out of order we went 2 floors up to use other mens bathroom instead but women use whichever one they want smh.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 02:50 AM
9

Being a petty, immature asshole by engaging in the exact behavior you're claiming is so awful (going in the other gender's bathrooms) is a good thing in your eyes? He didn't say "awful." He didn't say "wrong." He said "unfair." Do I need to explain the distinction, or do you think you have it for yourself?
/r/MensRights23/03/20 01:04 AM
-1

Point the first: what kind of psychiatrist sees someone every day? Unless you're in a ward, and then you have bigger problems. Point the second: or, she could find a romantic partner who can provide that for her. Isn't that why we look for romantic partners, after all?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/20 05:53 PM
-2

That means she essentially gets to see him every other day, and those days are full days. That's not how reality works. 12 days off a month; depending on how his work arranges, and how he thinks about things, some of those "off" days might be travel days, and unless he's being insanely stingy with his definitions, at least a few of those days are going to be days he just got back from a red-eye flight, or days he's packing up to head back out. And "every other day" is not at all the same as not …
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/20 04:37 PM
10

Are their rules not good enough for them? Or do they get to switch between rule sets when they like? I'm perfectly happy to stick with the presumption of innocence, if they will as well.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 12:17 AM
17

Sometimes yes. Sometimes no.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:09 PM
15

And like white people don't understand how black people get treated sometimes. I think the confusion in all cases can be summed up as "No-one could be that big an asshole. This person must be exaggerating, or misunderstanding or something. Seriously, who could possibly act like that, and still draw breath?"
/r/MensRights05/08/18 05:42 PM
4

That... that doesn't make you stop and think about the nonsense you're spewing? That all-male is sexist, but all female is fine? That is rather nonsensical, isn't it?
/r/MensRights24/07/18 02:04 AM
1

Not really. It's just a mechanism for applying emphasis. You used it to indicate that while it might be long, you didn't want it to be excessively long. She used it to indicate that while it was a possibility, it was a remote possibility. Don't blame the words for the shitty things being said.
/r/MGTOW03/07/18 02:15 AM
1

(She raised her voice in that word, to make it sound less possible i think? Idk, a whore is a whore.) Did you see the way you capitalized the word "REALLY" in the first line, for emphasis? Exactly the same thing.
/r/MGTOW02/07/18 11:55 PM
10

She was sentenced. She hasn't served it yet, unless something fucky is going on with the nature of time.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/18 09:59 PM
4

We're trying to figure out why anyone would continue to date her after that. Got to be something.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/18 09:56 PM
28

I wouldn't even say "the system." I would just point at individual prosecutors, unwilling to admit they were wrong.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 04:58 PM
0

Because we don't want anyone giving other people grief for their words? Weather they agree with us or not?
/r/MGTOW22/01/18 02:34 AM
1

You make a good point, but I'm not sure the distinction is relevant. People regularly accept that other people will pay the cost for what they are doing. I can list off a dozen examples, but I doubt you need them. What is important is that generally, we accept someone else being inconvenienced in order to convenience ourselves. Dick move, but not really serious. Sometimes, we hit more serious stakes; we accept that someone else will suffer a more significant consequence in order for us to do som…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 08:25 PM
-2

this is a person with an audience stating that they don't care if an outside group is harmed, directly and measurably, by their audience. She says that in her initial statement, yes. She follows up by saying that it is a "price she is willing to pay." This is what everyone here seems to be focusing on. Any general speaking so callously of his own troops would be a terrible general. But realistically speaking, that's how things have to be done. You hope for no casualties, but you know they are go…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 07:42 PM
2

As shitty a thing as this is to say, bear in mind that we often accept the "price" that others will have to pay. Most consumer electronics are made by virtual slave labor - that's a price that we're willing to pay for smartphones. Most cheap clothing is produced in sweatshops - that's a price we're willing to pay for wal-mart polos. Lots of us want to raise taxes on the rich - that's a price that we're willing to pay for things like healthcare, and roads and stuff. We should focus less on that s…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 05:22 PM
-22

To be fair, this is how every single war goes. When we decided that we needed to stop the Nazis from conquering Europe, the President and Congress had to decide if they were willing to pay in the blood of other people to accomplish their own goals. This is part of why a leader that dosn't rush to war is considered a good leader.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 05:14 PM
6

The South park creators are more firmly in control of their own product. They can respond to pressure by stopping their work, and not creating their product. Harrington dosn't have that option.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 05:19 PM
15

No, I just don't like kids. I'd rather sit in the box and read.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:40 PM
17

Of course anyone would rather sit at home and watch children, than be a parking attendant. Demonstrably false. I've done both, and it's the little freezing box with exhaust fumes for me, thank you. Other then that, you've got the right idea.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 05:57 PM
1

im not sure how this whole "colleges are full of brainwashed SJWs" internet narrative came about, Because most collages actually practice freedom of speech. You can set up booths selling cookies to men for 80% more then to women. You can have this demonstration, or that lecture. You can express your beliefs freely. Easily 95% of the students don't have anything they care to express, though. So the ones that do, get some attention. Outside that, most people won't pay any attention.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:26 PM
1

It most certainly is. She's not questioning the argument. She's questioning the assertion. If thousands of fathers, in fact, can't see their children, then that's a basis for argument. But just saying it isn't.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:23 PM
2

How does it not work?
/r/MensRights22/07/17 01:51 AM
1

What women are asking for is the presumption that when they come forward with rape accusations, that it not be immediately dismissed as their fault, or making up a story, or punishing them first. No, that's what they want. It's not what they are asking for. Words actually have meanings.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 04:12 AM
5

Care to address his point, rather than his tone?
/r/MensRights13/05/17 04:45 PM
12

That's 2 and a half men a day for 12 years. If we assume that she worked a brothel, rather than a street corner, that's not terribly out of the question. Some days off, some days busy, and it works out OK.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 04:44 PM
6

No, you should have known better. Based on what? You utter hostility to the concept of providing proof?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 11:58 AM
17

But you'd be a moron not to believe me, seeing as I was proven right once again. And I'd be a moron to believe you before you were proven right, as well.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 11:53 AM
23

I don't care whether my argument is dismissed. Then why are you here? Why did you bring it up in the first place? Another commenter finally proved me right and linked to the case so I guess that sucks for you. LOL You guess wrong. He provided the information I requested, so now I am better informed. Good for me, good for everyone involved. Still don't understand your refusal to provide the support for your argument.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 11:42 AM
25

Try being less wrong and less lazy No, I don't believe so. OP has provided a link to a news story. If you want to argue against it, you need to provide your sources, or your argument will be dismissed.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 11:35 AM
10

Are you seriously suggesting that a Western ideology created the notion that women are better care-givers than men? No. He's suggesting that a Western ideology had the idea written into US code.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:03 AM
1

Which is a fair opinion. The law doesn't support that opinion, so one can hardly expect the law to uphold it. From a moral standpoint, however, the issues are much more similar than different.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 03:28 AM
3

That's debatable. Depends on when a given cellular structure becomes "human." There are a variety of opinions.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:19 AM
5

Abortion is all well and good. Birthing a child, and leaving it to die is still a crime, last I checked.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:12 AM
8

This sub is all based around attacking feminism as opposed to actually promoting men's rights Men's Right #1 - Not to be used as a scapegoat by others.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 06:04 PM
13

http://www.wbrz.com/news/mother-arrested-for-leaving-infant-also-charged-in-2009-hot-car-death/ This is her second offense. (apparently, the first one was someone else child not hers. My bad) Because (you claim) women don't get punished for murder, this relates to men being taught not to rape... which relates to men's rights...? Do I need to draw you a picture? Some men rape people. Women claim that men need "to be taught not to rape." Some women murder children, deliberately or by negligence. W…
/r/MensRights26/12/16 05:00 PM
67

I'm thinking it's mostly to compare the treatment of men with women. Men get to be taught not to rape. Women get to walk after killing their child.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 04:15 PM
3

They won't stop doing something because they know it's wrong, but because they don't want to get slapped. Which is, of course, why our judges hand down sentences of "make sure he knows it's wrong," rather than actual punishments. It would be terrible if we lived in a civilization where good behavior was compelled by fear of consequences, rather than everyone doing the right thing naturally.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/12/16 03:22 AM
17

The entire thought process that starts with the idea that as a white person I'm automatically racist, and nothing I can ever do can make me not racist, but I can learn to at least do better by following the teachings of the SJW are Original Sin repackaged. Original Sin is a major reason I left the church, and it's a major reason that I reject any train of thought that starts that way. I am not a racist. I am not a sinner. I may occasionally do a racist thing, or commit a sin, but there are momen…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 02:49 AM
10

You are seriously putting this one event on par with the whole of segregation? Of course he isn't, don't be foolish.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/16 01:43 PM
12

That's what this stuff is all about. Maybe that's what it's about, but that's not what they are saying.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/16 05:18 PM
6

He's hot half a point. The correct move is "Teach people what rape is."
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/16 03:59 PM
9

Rape is not always easy to identify for people. The correct move is "Teach people what rape is." I'm all in favor of that. Once that's none, I would expect most people to then not do those things.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/16 03:57 PM
17

http://i.imgur.com/3TY3Aya.png
/r/PussyPassDenied19/06/16 01:29 PM
1

And not all vegetarians are pains in the ass. But if it comes up in casual conversation, then that's a bad sign.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 01:48 AM
2

When all else fails, read the instructions.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:02 PM
7

No one (here, anyway) is suggesting that women be forced to have an abortion. We just want the same right to walk away that the woman gets.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:41 PM
1

If she gives you a false ID, you're still guilty.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/15 01:22 AM
3

And police officers are supposed to be keepers of the peace. What's your point?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/08/15 11:03 PM
3

... my statement is still not an expression of personal opinion. It's a reference to the objective development of this story. A very relevant point. I shouldn't ascribe motives to people.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:21 PM
2

He meant it seriously, and it was therefore taken seriously. He stands by it, though it has been polished to a "romance in the work place is inappropriate", which is gender-neutral, diplomatically worded and objectively correct. So, you don't object to his ideas. You just want him to be gender-neutral and diplomatic.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 05:58 PM
0

The problem with THIS story, however, is that there is little to no evidence suggesting that she did not rape a 12 year old. There's no such thing as evidence of a negative, except for evidence of something else.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 03:01 PM
2

And here I thought we fought the second world war because Japan bombed the shit out of one of our naval bases.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 12:32 AM
3

To be fair, an image of a criminal can be VERY valuable to police.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 05:02 PM
44

Social Justice Warrior. Living proof of the adage "There is no cause so right that one cannot find a fool following it."
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:59 PM
3

So we should just jail everyone who has been accused of a violent crime before proving that they are actually the culprit? This is not an uncommon practice. The judge has to decide how likely the accused is to do something untoward.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/15 11:37 PM
30

Without this false accusation, it's none of your business if she likes sex However, with the false accusation, it becomes a point to consider. The terminology may be unnecessarily impolite, but considering what she inflicted on the other guy, I'm not terribly concerned with her feelings.
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 03:32 PM
-6

How do we know the guy wasn't an asshole, and the community better off without him?
/r/MensRights23/11/14 04:53 PM
2

To be fair, Advertizing would be a terrible job.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:14 AM
6

men don’t know what the hell they want from us. I might be alone here, but as a rule, I know exactly what I want from a woman. It's just not seemly to think that way.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:10 AM
1

we will make it better by protecting men from being forced into war. This is something that can never be done on the level of the individual country. It takes two to make peace, but only one to make wart.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:05 PM
4

My suspicion is simply that it is the poor black men offering their services. Either that, or the fact that the less money a person has, the more leverage can be exerted over them with even a very limited offer of additional resources.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 09:23 PM
1

We are aware that this is the Daily Mail, right?
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:51 PM
10

That isn't his objection. He is concerned that your statement seems to be an "always" statement, while it should be phrased as a "sometimes" statement.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 11:45 PM
5

If minds changed with the facts, we wouldn't need affirmative action.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:39 AM
13

The question was "equally drunk" not "drank the same amount." The point is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:45 AM
9

I'm not going to let another human being suffer because I'm afraid I can't explain myself. How about your wife? Your own kids? If you have to fight the system at all, you have just gone bankrupt. If you loose, you are now both bankrupt, and up shit creek without a paddle. It's a lot easier to take a stand for what is right when only you are on the line.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:45 AM
6

Meh. Fair's fair. The amount of boobs has also gone up, somewhat, along with the permitted exposure of those boobs. And don't even talk to me about boobs on HBO. I'd rather keep those thoughts to myself.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 03:32 PM
3

Have you been to r/Funny?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:46 PM
1

IIRC, they referred to it with a gender-pronoun unique to itself. But it has been a while since I read Fleet of Worlds.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:00 PM
3

Used earlier yet by Lary Niven's Puppeteers.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:53 PM
-1

You're allowed to do all kinds of things to a child, with the permission of the parents, that yo couldn't do to an adult without his consent. You really need a better argument in this case.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 04:33 PM
12

That's kind of what he said: . . . he was not ill he had no need of medical care . . . Not performing surgery on people who don't need it counts as acting with expected care.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 10:37 PM
1

I didn't say Prostate Exams did have anything to do with birth control. It is, however, a preventative care procedure that most men get (or should get) and most women don't. This compares to birth control pills.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 01:29 AM
1

If Prostate Exams are covered, I see no reason that Birth Control shouldn't be covered. Like you said, we should be going for 'everyone getting what they need' and equality should exist in the amount of shaft we get from the government.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:38 PM
1

Treating people as individuals is genuine equality. This statement is true, but let me stop you before you go any further. This is not going to happen. It simply isn't. The insurance company doesn't know me, nor care about me. I'm a statistic. The government doesn't know or care. I'm a statistic. This is simply the way of things. Now that we have established that, how do you feel we can best treat people equally?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:36 PM
3

Could be I'm just playing the stereotype here, but I honestly can't imagine more than a bare handful of men who would attempt to maliciously get a woman pregnant. The logistics just don't work out.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:05 AM
12

Are we still talking about umbrellas?
/r/seduction29/09/12 03:43 AM
-2

Are we? Speaking as someone who has never been in the situation, I think you need to see a man (or woman, for that matter) seriously backed into a corner before you judge how much 'better' he is. And I think you need to spend a moment in that corner yourself before you judge too harshly.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:36 PM
1

Except that this is not the case. I have the right to vote. I have the responsibility to to register for the draft. The two are not directly connected, except that the government takes the opportunity of you officially presenting yourself to ensure that you have fulfilled your responsibilities. See also: drivers license, student loans, getting into collage, applying for some jobs, receiving welfare. Anyone else have examples of occasions that you are checked to make sure you registered?
/r/MensRights19/08/12 10:18 PM
0

May I refer you [here?](www.reddit.com/r/nofap) They seem to be avoiding the 'necessity.'
/r/MensRights11/08/12 04:01 AM
5

Consider that, due to cultural expectations, females are less likely to report accurate numbers than males. Also that females may refrain from masturbation because they consider it 'wrong.' You seem to have evidence that males do masturbate more then women, not that they must.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 08:44 PM
2

Men, incidentally, of whom the necessity of masturbation is essentially requisite and unquestionably far greater than in women. Essentially requisite? Unquestionably far greater? Have you any basis, aside from personal experience, upon which to make these claims?
/r/MensRights10/08/12 08:11 PM
0

... is because corporations actually lobby for regulations in their favor in the modern US. So, the invisible hand doesn't work. Or, I suppose you could argue that it works just not in any realistic situation.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:19 AM
3

Best way to win, IMO.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 04:40 PM
6

Under the new plan, the equalization will be phased in by 2020.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 04:34 PM
6

IMO, it's the other way around. I do not wish to be a father. I cannot state this strongly enough. But if my wife gets pregnant? I'll damn well step up to the plate. If, after that I was to discover that I was forced into the position, and the child was not mine, it would be unacceptable to ask me to play a role I don't want to play, when it's not my responsibility. But that's me. The below story, where the man took the boy as his own son is very admirable; well done him. But that was his choice…
/r/MensRights24/03/11 07:14 PM
1

Try eating only food on your left then?
/r/MensRights09/02/11 12:06 AM
1

There's a distinction between giving you the key, and leaving the key somewhere handy for me, and you using it without permission. Yea, it sucks for the guy, and I hope the judge will go easy on him. But he clearly violated that law.
/r/MensRights27/12/10 08:32 AM
1

If I leave my door unlocked, do you have the right to come inside and listen to my CDs?
/r/MensRights26/12/10 11:02 PM
1

Monitor your usage, yes. Read the bits transmitted to you, sure. Log into your account themselves? I think not.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 11:02 PM
1

Yes. Indiscrepancies would be details that match up.
/r/MensRights21/11/10 04:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter