TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jibaeja Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by jibaeja on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

That’s not a metric. What number validates the claim that an average woman (median income for woman, little to no formal education amongst women, from an average sized town, heterosexual, cisgender) outperforms the average man using the same numbers?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:05 PM
–

By what metric are you assessing average women have it easier than average men?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 11:02 PM
1

Uhhh yeah? I’ve objectified men before by being attracted to their bodies without knowing anything about their personalities. That’s not the point of my counter to OP’s argument. I think you’re lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:31 PM
–

There’s a difference between finding someone attractive and finding solely their bodies attractive and then actioning on that desire for what their body can offer you sexually by leading them on to think you are attracted to them in totality before ghosting them after you get the sexual objective of their body. I think you know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:13 PM
–

No one was talking to you in the first place and you’ve inserted yourself with senseless semantics as OP hasn’t even responded to me yet for there to be misunderstanding. A net non-contribution to the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:33 PM
–

There are no celebrities who I would use for their bodies sexually and then discard, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:32 PM
–

No, he said that objectification only exists in rare cases, which, according to the actual definition of the word and how it’s been applied logically between men and women regarding sex, is simply not true. I genuinely feel like a few of you are responding without reading what he actually said to defend against “women opinions”. He said men rarely act in pure objectification, which he attributes to mental illness or bad apples, whereas many men do actually frequently engage in pure objectificati…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:28 PM
–

You’re contributing nothing to this conversation. At all. A perfect example of someone who imagines themselves smarter than they are and enjoys hearing themselves speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:24 PM
–

Admitting that “bad men” objectify women because they’re “bad men” is proof that objectification exists on some scale, the level of which is clearly up for debate. So, regardless, his statement is objectively incorrect as the number of “bad men” who see women purely as a sexual means to an end is not statistically minute.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:17 PM
–

But that’s not what the definition of objectification is. Objectification is “the act of treating a person as a mere object or thing, stripping them of their agency, feelings, and basic humanity. It reduces complex individuals to commodities, instruments, or tools.” Which is literally what OP admits men do by wanting to use women purely for sex because they’re attracted to their bodies. And then argues that that is okay. This proves the existence of objectification in that dynamic. You need to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:11 PM
–

You just admit men “can be assholes about their sexual attraction to women”, meaning you recognize the severely skewed entitlement and lack of consideration men can have for woman’s boundaries regarding their bodies, yet you double down that objectification does not exist. Literally opposing statements. Lol. Fascinating cognitive dissonance in this sub sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:50 PM
–

No response here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 02:33 PM
1

Something is wrong with women like you’ve mentioned in the first part. There is zero culture where women encourage others or find folly in being a man problematic to other women. This is so strange you’ve made all these connections in your head regarding fictional characters and rappers to come to that conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:48 PM
–

I'm not on TikTok. What are the women saying specifically?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 07:05 PM
–

Okay, have you seen them?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 06:52 PM
5

No, the sentence is properly constructed and what you’re demanding is redundant. You just interpreted it how you wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 06:28 PM
7

Can you not read? It says “a man”, not “all men”, meaning I’m referencing the specific man a woman may post. How in the world do you interpret that as me saying women should only date women?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 06:22 PM
3

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 06:20 PM
1

You are confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 06:09 PM
10

What kills me is that “Are We Dating the Same Guy [INSERT CITY]” groups on Facebook have been far more active and engaged with for years, and you all have a very skewed perception of how these platforms are actually used. 95% of the posts are about abuse, assault, creepy behavior, or how a man makes a terrible dating partner. And women are often appalled to find out they’ve been seeing the same man, as that’s considered bad to us. No woman “wants to see” why other girls date a man to then pursue…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 06:08 PM
-6

Yeah but the descriptor doesn’t really serve any point to your statement.... the fact that she’s a girl tells us all we need to know about why she would be dismissive about mandatory enlistment. the other things you just added to be offensive lol how would you like it everyone referenced you as the fat guy whenever they discuss something you say or did?
/r/MensRights07/05/19 07:32 PM
-3

what was the point in bringing up her race and weight lol
/r/MensRights07/05/19 07:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter