jiimmyyy Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	Red Pill Philosophy is an Absolute Joke		jiimmyyy	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 01:36 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	[Recent] meta-analysis revealed a stronger sex drive in men compared to women, with a medium-to-large effect size, g = 0.69, 95% CI [0.58, 0.81]. Men more often think and fantasize about sex, more often experience sexual affect like desire, […] (Frankenbach et al., 2022) NO SHIT	/r/BlackPillScience	04/12/22 10:43 PM
-7	Females who had sexual initiation under the age of 17 had higher odds of major depressive episodes, however, no association was found for males. So?	/r/BlackPillScience	24/11/22 07:55 AM
6	The average insertable size of the bestselling realistic dildos is larger than 95% of adult penises. No shit. With a longer one you simply use as much of the length as you need, so there's no risk of it being too short. Makes complete sense to err on the side of it being longer than needed. What's the surprise here?	/r/BlackPillScience	03/11/22 02:46 PM
21	94.3% (90.1% on at least a multi-yearly basis) of women reported fantasizing about having sex with a "highly physically attractive" man. So what?	/r/BlackPillScience	29/10/22 10:15 AM
-1	At American colleges, East Asian females were 1.5x more likely to report having sex outside of a relationship and had 1.25x more hookups than East Asian males, despite being more likely than East Asian males to report that "sex requires love" and "premarital sex is wrong." So?	/r/BlackPillScience	11/10/22 07:26 PM
5	On average, female brain weight peaks at around age 16, and male brain weight peaks at around age 19, with male brain weight being 9.8% greater than female brain weight. So?	/r/BlackPillScience	26/09/22 09:49 AM
1	Women on birth control prefer less masculine faces. You don't know what a straw man is.	/r/BlackPillScience	05/05/22 07:47 AM
-2	What a King Looks like you were right.	/r/PussyPassDenied	23/12/21 07:28 PM
-18	What a King Evidence.	/r/PussyPassDenied	23/12/21 02:11 PM
-3	Chasing the paper Evidence.	/r/PussyPassDenied	24/10/21 11:33 AM
1	Female STM desire has 0 relation to attractiveness or status of the man Loving the mental gymnastics on display in these comments. "It doesn't fit my narrative so this is bullshit! It's not true!! IT'S NOT!!!!!" The black pill, everyone.	/r/BlackPillScience	12/10/21 06:47 AM
2	“Chemistry”... what is it? Cool. Your position is to be laughed at and dismissed then.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/21 09:22 PM
2	“Chemistry”... what is it? Not good enough. Do better.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/21 09:21 PM
2	“Chemistry”... what is it? Evidence	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/21 09:19 PM
1	Men, does this sound logical to you? It's not logical at all. Far from it. Your argument assumes the premise that not wanting to perform the act is intrinsically a result of how one views their partner, as opposed to not liking the act itself. You've not shown this, you just keep begging the question.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/10/21 02:17 PM
1	Women develop crushes outside their relationship all the time. Considering no actual cheating, how should men react to them? Demonstrate that they don't feel that way about me. The difference it makes is that a feeling is an involuntary chemical reaction resulting in a particular state of consciousness, whereas an action is a chosen behaviour.	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/10/21 10:39 PM
3	Women develop crushes outside their relationship all the time. Considering no actual cheating, how should men react to them? I don't really care, as long as they don't pursue it. There are so many people that we meet in our lives, we're bound to develop feelings for some of them, whether we're already in relationships or not.	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/10/21 09:21 AM
2	To women who complain about sexism, discrimination or oppression. Not an argument. Do better.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/10/21 11:30 AM
2	a threesome is 2 girls 1 man Reality says otherwise, but good try though.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/10/21 09:04 AM
1	CMV: There's no such thing as hypergamy, women are just extremely shallow and immature Cute pivot. So I'll repeat myself for you. Evidence. Nothing to do with whether you're coping or not. Think.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/21 05:49 PM
1	CMV: There's no such thing as hypergamy, women are just extremely shallow and immature Do I? Evidence. Nothing to do with whether you're coping or not. A tu quoque fallacy. Do better.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/21 05:46 PM
2	CMV: There's no such thing as hypergamy, women are just extremely shallow and immature Keep coping little buddy. Scream into the abyss more.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/21 05:42 PM
1	CMV: There's no such thing as hypergamy, women are just extremely shallow and immature No one suggested that you argue with anyone. I simply pointed out that you didn't posit an argument. Either you posit one or it's reasonable to conclude that, much like OP, you're just impotently angry regardless of the reality of the situation.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/21 05:42 PM
2	CMV: There's no such thing as hypergamy, women are just extremely shallow and immature Cool, so you're just impotently angry then, and don't have any factual basis for your positions. That was easy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/21 05:40 PM
2	CMV: There's no such thing as hypergamy, women are just extremely shallow and immature Not an argument. Do better.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/21 05:36 PM
0	CMV: There's no such thing as hypergamy, women are just extremely shallow and immature Not remotely good enough as substantiation for anything. Evidence for this new claim. Even if granted as true, doesn't support the point at hand. Do better.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/21 05:31 PM
-1	CMV: There's no such thing as hypergamy, women are just extremely shallow and immature Prove it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/21 05:28 PM
2	CMV: There's no such thing as hypergamy, women are just extremely shallow and immature Evidence, or your position is to be laughed at and dismissed. Thanks.	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/21 05:28 PM
1	PPD is 50% misandrists, 48% incels, 2% sluts/fuck boys. Evidence.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/10/21 07:24 PM
1	Who does PPD attract? That's not something I've ever thought about. The same way as you'd shit on anyone else, I guess?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/09/21 11:00 AM
6	Who does PPD attract? I'm here to shit all over people who think of themselves as "red pilled" and laugh at their entire ill-informed philosophy. It's just easy pickings. I like to argue with people, and red-pilled people are just low hanging fruit.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/09/21 08:54 PM
2	Women don’t care if you’re sensitive, women don’t like or appreciate men expressing their emotions or showing any vulnerability when it comes to relationships Evidence.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/09/21 08:54 PM
0	Thoughts on transgender people? Nice straw man buddy. Got any other laughably stupid and ill-informed comments to add?	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/09/21 12:01 PM
0	Thoughts on transgender people? Trans people are real and they deserve to be treated with compassion. It's as simple as that. Anyone who holds a position to the contrary is an insecure little child with poor cognitive abilities.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/09/21 07:07 AM
1	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? Nothing I said is contingent on you helping me understand basic context, nor did the context suggest anything other than your own stupidity. Pay attention. I'll ask again - are you going to own up to your failure to use language adequately and then blame me for not understanding? Or no?	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 12:54 PM
1	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? Nice pivot. Address your poor use of language and the fact that you tried to justify it and put the blame on me for not understanding your position. Thank you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 12:49 PM
1	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? No, it wasn't clear. You said OP. That term refers to the poster of the post currently being discussed, which is the person I cited. You don't get to redefine terms to suit your narrative because you can't cope with correcting your own bad use of language.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 12:45 PM
1	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? I don't care who you're talking about, I care about the person you referred to as indicated by the words you used, because it's the only tool I have available available to me to understand what your position is, short of reading your mind. You said OP, so I responded accordingly. I'll say it again - the specifics. Grasp them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 12:31 PM
2	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? What we're disagreeing on is whether OP gave their position or not, not what OP referenced in their post. Are the specifics too subtle for you?	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 12:19 PM
2	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? Wrong. U/ExtraBurdensomeCount is. Pay attention.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 12:10 PM
1	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? Yes	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 11:51 AM
1	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? OP didn't even give their stance, and the comment in question was therefore not about it. The comment here adequately described the issue with the statement cited by OP. You're lost.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 11:50 AM
1	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? That explains it	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 11:46 AM
3	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? This is about the statement, not the book.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 11:44 AM
1	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? Can you not read?	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 11:35 AM
1	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? No it's not	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 11:35 AM
3	"When a woman talks to a man, she is thinking of his future (his earning potential, etc.), and when a man talks to a woman, he is thinking of her past (how old is she? her weight? her history?)." - The Book of Pook. How applicable is this statement some 20 years after Pook wrote it? Because it adequately describes a simple phenomenon rather than trying to simplify a complex one.	/r/PurplePillDebate	13/09/21 11:35 AM
2	When do you think it's "too late" to find a good partner? Evidence.	/r/PurplePillDebate	12/09/21 08:34 AM
1	Why should a woman choose to date a man she knows is using porn? Yes, you are. I told you that you'd failed to address their second sentence. You then addressed their second sentence in a reply to me. You need to address it to them. The only thing relevant to me would have been a comment about whether you'd addressed said sentence or not.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/09/21 10:41 AM
2	Why should a woman choose to date a man she knows is using porn? You're replying to the wrong person.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/09/21 10:14 AM
2	Why should a woman choose to date a man she knows is using porn? Their point can be quite easily inferred from their second sentence, which you seem to have missed.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/09/21 09:37 AM
9	Women focus on careers because a career is a good investment, a man generally isn't Substantiate that or it's to be laughed at and dismissed. Thanks.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/09/21 07:30 AM
5	Women focus on careers because a career is a good investment, a man generally isn't I'll ask again - are you going to address the straw man you laid out or nah? Not good enough. A classic example of circular reasoning. Saying "this whole post" isn't evidence in support of anything you've said. You need to demonstrate that the contents of this post point towards your conclusion. Deductively, given how sure you are. I also notice you've totally evaded substantiating that claim you made about me. So yeah, get on with that as well please. Thank you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/09/21 07:20 AM
8	Women focus on careers because a career is a good investment, a man generally isn't Nothing to do with what you're replying to - the fact that you hit a straw man right off that bat. You going to engage that or just continue pivoting? "Ya'll too afraid an insecure to live you're lives. So afraid of the..." - evidence for this please. Thanks. "This whole post... is a copium on steroids" - evidence for that too. Thanks.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/09/21 07:00 AM
10	Women focus on careers because a career is a good investment, a man generally isn't Cute. Now give an actual argument.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/09/21 06:53 AM
8	Women focus on careers because a career is a good investment, a man generally isn't You hit a straw man right off the bat. Have another go.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/09/21 06:52 AM
1	Could #MeToo Ultimately Be A Good Thing? I'd love you to back that up.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/09/21 02:48 PM
1	Could #MeToo Ultimately Be A Good Thing? Actually, yes you do. You either demonstrate that your position holds validity or it's to be laughed at and dismissed. First order logic. Keep up.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/09/21 02:32 PM
0	Could #MeToo Ultimately Be A Good Thing? Not good enough - further unsubstantiated claims are not evidence. Demonstrate that I can't read what I wrote. Demonstrate that it's dripping with irony. Do better.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/09/21 02:25 PM
0	Could #MeToo Ultimately Be A Good Thing? Nice pivot. If you're going to reply then add something pertinent as opposed to citing irrelevant trivialities. Also, evidence that I played myself. Thanks.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/09/21 02:22 PM
0	Could #MeToo Ultimately Be A Good Thing? Evidence, or your claim is to be laughed at and dismissed. Thanks.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/09/21 09:08 AM
-1	Could #MeToo Ultimately Be A Good Thing? Of course it was good. This doesn't need discussing.	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/09/21 09:01 AM
-2	Could #MeToo Ultimately Be A Good Thing? Wtf is wrong with you?	/r/PurplePillDebate	09/09/21 09:01 AM
3	Women on birth control prefer less masculine faces. Never mind I think I get the point - Birth control is a tool of the weak effeminate left that turns women into soy lovers but deep down when they're not under the influence of this mind controlling medication they will invariably submit for Chad. Is that it?	/r/BlackPillScience	08/09/21 02:07 PM
-8	Women on birth control prefer less masculine faces. Who cares?	/r/BlackPillScience	08/09/21 02:05 PM
2	Red Pill is not what you think it is This is nothing to do with semantics. Stop making stuff up in order to avoid meeting your burdens of proof of acknowledging your hilarious failure to getting remotely close to substantiating anything you've put forward. Red pill ideology has nothing to do with objective reality. That's why the academic community don't take it seriously and that's why any and all of their positions take a few minutes of reading to debunk, on the few occasions that a simple assessment of the poor internal reasonin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/21 09:11 PM
2	Red Pill is not what you think it is Whether they came from a blue pilled mind set and whether it worked out for them is totally irrelevant and begs the question in so many ways that it's impossible to know where to start. Can you show this? By what metric are you determining that something didn't work for them? Can you show why it didn't work? Can you show that it was inherently a result of their "blue pilled" mindset? Can you show that they represent a usable sample size? Can you show that any changes they made and results they s…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/21 05:46 PM
2	Red Pill is not what you think it is You need to demonstrate that it's flawed as opposed to asserting it. You also need to engage it rather than arguing against a straw man, if you actually understand what my point is. It is that people have a vested interest in it - that's exactly what it is. It's a behavioural process that centres around what people want to believe is true as opposed to what is true, and their attempt attempt define the red pill as nothing other than an intellectual pursuit is a symptom of that same behaviour. It…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/21 05:01 PM
2	Red Pill is not what you think it is I'm not interested in how it's defined by people who have a vested interested in portraying it as something far more valid than what it actually is. I'm solely interested in what I've observed it to be. I understand the distinction fully. The issue here is not that I don't understand that distinction, the issue is that said distinction isn't relevant. I'm not conflating knowledge with the people who use it, I'm simply asserting that the red pill is not one of those things. This is twice I've exp…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/21 04:30 PM
1	Red Pill is not what you think it is That's exactly what I mentioned. You seem to be under the impression that the red pill is a philosophy or intellectual framework. It's not. I know people like yourself would like to believe that's what it is, but it simply isn't. The (laughable attempt at an) intellectual framework to which you refer is just one component that sits on top of the phenomenon.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/21 03:24 PM
1	Red Pill is not what you think it is I described what the red pill is fundamentally. I said nothing whatsoever about anything subjective.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/21 03:19 PM
2	Red Pill is not what you think it is What I just described.	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/21 03:09 PM
4	Red Pill is not what you think it is The red pill is fundamentally immature men who like the aesthetic of the traditionally masculine intellectual who talks about the dark truths of the world that no one wants to hear, so what they do is adopt this as a costume in the same way that you'd see a 5 year old running in a Spider Man outfit. They want to desperately be that person and so they try to manifest it by acting it out. But it's just that - a silly costume; the science is bad, the reasoning, is bad, and the people trying to adop…	/r/PurplePillDebate	07/09/21 02:45 PM
–	A certain trait to consider when it comes to women is often overlooked… Copypasta.	/r/PurplePillDebate	06/09/21 02:23 PM
0	The reason why so many women can't seem to fundamentally accept why dating (or other favored aspects of life) overall is so fundamentally easier for them than for men is due to indoctrination pushed under the guise of 'education' Straight off the first sentence - evidence for that. Thanks.	/r/PurplePillDebate	04/09/21 08:07 PM
15	Biology versus Cultural Conditioning. Female perception of Men showing Emotion and opening up and masculine Men. "Women are hardwired to seek protectors and providers" - can you show this? And I mean actually show this, not a watered down version. "How can a man who opens up about his vulnerabilities and cries instead of being competitive do the protection? He can not" - Again, please show this. "even the virtue signaling women ostensibly claiming to seek an emotionally open man will have dry vaginas whenever their man actually cries." - Once again, can you show this? And no, a screenshot of what one women…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/09/21 04:01 PM
1	CMV: Men shouldn’t take dating advice from women online at all, until they consider what type of women they want to attract Can you show that? You'll also need to quantify as opposed to vaguely gesture. So many? How many? What is that as a percentage? If true, how does it support your position?	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/09/21 08:54 PM
4	Women having toxic beauty standard is a result of their own high sexual disgust and seeing only top tier men as a qualified partner. That's not good enough.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/21 10:26 AM
11	Women having toxic beauty standard is a result of their own high sexual disgust and seeing only top tier men as a qualified partner. You need to 1. Define your terms and 2. Provide evidence. Otherwise there's nothing to talk about.	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/21 10:21 AM
1	CMV: Men shouldn’t take dating advice from women online at all, until they consider what type of women they want to attract "The surface level "nuances" every woman (and man) has pales in comparison" The surface level "nuances" every woman (and man)has pales in comparison to the similarities they have, because we're all the product of millions of years of evolution." This is totally non-sequitur to your premise. Do you think my position was predicated on ubiquitous traits not actually being ubiquitous? I specifically cited red pill philosophy and the social science phenomena they attempt to use to bolster their ideol…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/08/21 11:19 AM
3	CMV: Men shouldn’t take dating advice from women online at all, until they consider what type of women they want to attract Every woman is different and unique though, that's the thing. People have nuanced personalities, and anyone who actually socialises to any real extent is aware of this. People who believe nonsense such as "ThE rEd PiLl" work backwards from a desparate attempt at playing the impartial intellectual with hideous attempts at applying academic rigor to their observations about women, much like a toddler playing in a toy-kitchen and pretending that they're really cooking. The crux of the issue is th…	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/08/21 06:16 AM
1	CMV: Men shouldn’t take dating advice from women online at all, until they consider what type of women they want to attract Can you show that?	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/08/21 06:06 AM
5	Hypergamy is the core concept which explains human sexual selection and all TRP secondary concepts flow from this one human observation No she wasn't. No, she may not be my ex because of that. I know why she's my ex, and if it was because of hypergamy I would have factored that into the equation and not commented here in the first place.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/08/21 07:27 PM
11	Hypergamy is the core concept which explains human sexual selection and all TRP secondary concepts flow from this one human observation Sure. My ex. She was earning far more than me.	/r/PurplePillDebate	29/08/21 07:07 PM
2	Why do women have a lower threshold for disgust in regards to sex? A questions about what "the men here" bitch about is not evidence in support of the claim at hand.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 02:39 AM
2	Red Pill Philosophy is an Absolute Joke The problem is, if you dilute Red Pill thinking to nothing but the few elements of truth in support of it, then you strip it of all that defines it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 02:20 AM
1	Red Pill Philosophy is an Absolute Joke Nice pivot, totally irrelevant to the fact that the person to whom I was replying did not, in fact, posit an argument. And yes, I did - the Red Pill is a laughable philosophy predicated on an inability to conceptualise variability. That is my argument. Read. Wouldn't they? Can you show that? Because I'm sure I can show the contrary to it. Your points 1 and 2 do nothing to refute anything I said, so your conclusion from them that I should take a stars course isn't grounded. Think.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 02:16 AM
0	Red Pill Philosophy is an Absolute Joke Evidence of that. Thanks. Because I'm pretty sure I can demonstrate otherwise. But hey, you seem incredibly confident in that assertion. So let's see you support it. Deductively.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 02:09 AM
5	Red Pill Philosophy is an Absolute Joke Laughable. The Red Pill, everyone.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 02:08 AM
0	Red Pill Philosophy is an Absolute Joke Point to where I claimed otherwise. Thanks.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 02:07 AM
2	Red Pill Philosophy is an Absolute Joke Cute. Still waiting for that argument. Have another go.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 01:59 AM
-3	Red Pill Philosophy is an Absolute Joke Not an argument. Do better.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 01:53 AM
1	Red Pill Philosophy is an Absolute Joke You've totally failed to address the crux of my position, and your citing of another apparent law in place of doing so is indicative of that.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 01:53 AM
1	Red Pill Philosophy is an Absolute Joke You don't know what an appeal to authority is. Let me guess - you're "Red Pilled"?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 01:49 AM
1	Why do women have a lower threshold for disgust in regards to sex? ?	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 01:19 AM
0	Why do women have a lower threshold for disgust in regards to sex? Evidence	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/08/21 01:16 AM
1	Why the sexual market place will ALWAYS be skewed towards women in a free society. The framing of this as if it's an economic model is brutally cringe. Jesus.	/r/PurplePillDebate	23/08/21 11:22 AM
1	Physical attractiveness predicts endorsement of specific evolutionary psychology principles Nice pivot again. Is this the best you have?	/r/BlackPillScience	16/08/21 01:00 PM
0	Physical attractiveness predicts endorsement of specific evolutionary psychology principles Nice pivot. Are you going to revise your position so it's no longer a straw man? Or are you going to rely on arguing against a fictitious point in an attempt to feel validated?	/r/BlackPillScience	16/08/21 12:34 PM
-1	Physical attractiveness predicts endorsement of specific evolutionary psychology principles Not an argument. Do better.	/r/BlackPillScience	16/08/21 12:27 PM
-6	Physical attractiveness predicts endorsement of specific evolutionary psychology principles That's not what the study says at all buddy.	/r/BlackPillScience	16/08/21 06:06 AM
-3	Physical attractiveness predicts endorsement of specific evolutionary psychology principles That's a hell of a strawman buddy.	/r/BlackPillScience	16/08/21 06:05 AM
8	Blue Pillers, what is it you actually believe, and how does is contradict trp? It's actually quite simple - I haven't seen any red pill positions that come remotely close to being convincing. It's all just deliberately edgy, low-intelligence conjecture.	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/08/21 01:05 PM
0	Saying "life isn't fair" for dating inequality is the same as "life isn't fair" for economic inequality Nope. Criticising an economic system and advocating for a change for that is not the same as attempting to reach into how a given individual conducts their own life.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/07/21 08:53 PM
0	Women don't actually care that much about being "pumped and dumped." If they did, they would withhold sex until receiving whatever degree of commitment they want to be tied to sex. Not what happened at all. Good try though. Read it again, paying attention this time. Failing that, I'll hold your hand and walk you through it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/07/21 09:09 AM
-3	Women don't actually care that much about being "pumped and dumped." If they did, they would withhold sex until receiving whatever degree of commitment they want to be tied to sex. What an odd response. Engage the content of what you're replying to as opposed to getting upset, focusing on my character and using emojies to mask your irritation. Thank you.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/07/21 10:39 PM
1	Women don't actually care that much about being "pumped and dumped." If they did, they would withhold sex until receiving whatever degree of commitment they want to be tied to sex. It's not at all. It's just low-resolution analysis.	/r/PurplePillDebate	24/07/21 10:36 PM
0	What exactly did TRP teach you that normal dating advice doesn't? Whether you care about it or not is inconsequential. What's pertinent is your failure to apply first order logic and therefore your position can be dismissed.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/07/21 09:17 PM
-3	What exactly did TRP teach you that normal dating advice doesn't? Not how burden of proof works buddy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/07/21 10:46 PM