TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jilll_sandwich Archive

View 0 posts and 151 comments by jilll_sandwich on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Haha thank you! Such a good series
/r/RedPillWomen12/07/25 01:24 AM
1

I got curious and started googling. It seems the main theory is that on average, Reddit has people with more education than other social media platform. And on average, people with higher education tend to be more liberal in terms of politics according to research. I am not saying this applies to traditional values, just talking about liberal vs conservative differences you have noticed. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/04/26/a-wider-ideological-gap-between-more-and-less-educated-adults…
/r/RedPillWomen09/07/25 10:12 PM
1

I think both the size and topic of this sub are factors. It is relatively small and probably does not get suggested much to people with differing views or people looking for online fights. Also the general topic is quite personal. For ex I joined this sub to try and understand what the pills movements were, while I do not identify with it or even understand it yet, other people's personal choices in their lives do not affect me and they do not disadvantage parts of the community.
/r/RedPillWomen08/07/25 11:48 PM
3

Could be said about this sub too?
/r/RedPillWomen08/07/25 09:30 AM
2

You can't see the difference between a one-off horrible crime and the meticulous, long term planning and issuing orders to commit atrocities? The one article I read said she was remorseful. Yes the crime is terrible and I don't know if the sentence is appropriate, maybe not, but you can't compare the scale of those crimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 11:29 PM
1

I agree there are shit feminists and shit women, feminism is a wide movement with very diverse opinions on certain topics. It seems like this sub chooses to focus exclusively on radical feminists and see them as the norm. That was not the topic here though. Nothing I said was close to any of this. So I stand by what I said - OP went to a feminist group asking for money for a cause he did not even properly think about, trying to bait 'mean feminists to be mean to him'. He was not looking to progr…
/r/MensRights26/04/25 02:23 AM
1

You are delusional. You are the one that asked me if I read the report and now you are trying to explain (mansplain?) to me that it takes times? And now you're stalking me on other subs? Get a life. Read reports. Advocate for men instead of wasting your time here. Stop hallucinating. Stop hating women. I should have blocked you ages ago. Fixing that now.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:38 PM
-1

My background is not education, it's healthcare. Why don't you read it? I am here to learn about men's issues, mostly health. Some topics have been interesting and I did learn some things. I don't pick which posts go in my feed though. Sometimes the post just blames women for no reason. I had not seen the post on feminist sub before I saw your post here to answer your other comment. Sorry mate I don't get a crush on guys insulting me.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:30 PM
-1

Then don't complain about getting insulted in the feminist subreddit? I'm not the one making a post about it. I'm just telling you that it's not ok. And pointing out that here it's getting more upvotes than the insults in the feminist sub. So who's really hating the other gender again?
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:17 PM
0

I haven't done anything, I'm not even part of a feminist movement. You're imagining things again that all women are radical feminists hating boys. Again, go and read a feminist book. They talk about raising sons better. They are already doing something. Not once have I 'bitched' about women having it harder. You made that up too. If you were a little bit more open minded and calm, we could have had a nice discussion.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:16 PM
-1

I have not read the report and I don't know if it will help prove or disprove the OP's point. It was linked to OP on the other post and he did not want to read it because it was too long. Here's the link: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/111041644611110155/pdf/Educational-Underachievement-Among-Boys-and-Men.pdf
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:11 PM
0

Again look at your comments, insulting me, getting upvotes. This community is absolutely toxic on top of doing nothing to actually help men.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:07 PM
-1

You guys have no arguments apart insults. Feminists have done a lot for women, you cannot take that away. Men are unhappy about it constantly on this sub. Women do most of the job raising sons. So yes they also have their share of blame in the 'patriarchy mindset' they want to change. Feminists talk about that a lot. Maybe read a book one day instead of hallucinating things I have never said because it suits your narrative.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:05 PM
-5

Responses like 'of course we should help everyone' does nothing to actually help, it's not an action. Of course I think we should help everyone. But to actually help you need to commit to it. You don't have to read reports today, but you will have to. They were trying to give you practical advice on where the issue comes from, because their opinion was that additional classes would not help. If you want to prove them wrong, you'll have to show some proof if you want support there. I don't know m…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 09:56 PM
-10

Look at you getting into insults already. The report would have been helpful if you actually wanted to follow through with your project of funding. You do need to look at research. Or did you go to a feminist group expecting them to do the work? That person already did part of the work for you, finding you research, and you refuse to do the rest. You can vent all you want, but this sub is doing nothing concrete for men from what I can see. Just whining about feminist progress without organising …
/r/MensRights25/04/25 09:38 PM
-9

You actually received some really good answers. You were linked a report you refused to read. This report could have helped you advocate for the problem you are trying to fix. You want to spend money on extra classes without knowing what the issue is or reading research. Then you come here and complain, and of course you find support here because this sub loves hating on women.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 09:23 PM
1

Alright mate, I'm happy to have an intelligent discussion but since you seem to be fully set on wanting to believe that misandry is everywhere and that I'm malicious, I won't waste my time. Good luck.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 01:36 PM
1

There's no need to insult me when I am telling you facts. Healthcare has been biased agaisnt women for a long time, research was focused on men. Now there are health conditions that are not talked about for both genders, but explain to me why it is about genders. There are lots of conditions that affect both genders the same that people are not aware of.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 11:01 AM
1

Like I said there are issues with health in general. You can compare this to endometriosis care and research. Don't take it on breast cancer awareness, it's a positive thing. Bring the rest to that level.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 12:28 AM
1

How does crap like this makes so many views is the hard part for me to believe :( Objectively she's not even explaining the book properly.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 08:45 AM
-10

Seems like you are not intelligent enough to see every woman as being unique in their own right, so you have to generalise.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 08:43 AM
6

Sounds like you have a great guy at the moment and you are treating him really poorly by pining over a guy you never knew and never respected you. You would be miserable with that guy. Social media is also fake. I think you should do some reflecting and leave your current boyfriend, you don't deserve him.
/r/RedPillWomen17/04/25 08:22 PM
6

Probably bias due to horrifying past experiences. Honestly the best thing you can do to change their bias a little is show them kindness. Compassion goes a long way. Don't just hate because of numbers and statistics, otherwise it endlessly reinforces their beliefs.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 11:33 AM
1

Gender does not matter. I've had a$$holes bosses that were male or female. I've also had great ones for both. We want a nice person that can do their job well and respect their employees.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 09:34 PM
15

Flee before it's too late! Haha
/r/RedPillWomen05/04/25 08:40 AM
17

I think that's ok if he does half the cleaning and other tasks, including looking after your future children (if you want any). If that's not your view on things, then maybe you're not compatible. If he expects you to look after the house and kids and pay half the expenses, he's a jerk.
/r/RedPillWomen05/04/25 12:16 AM
2

I'm from Australia, and I work in healthcare. I learned about women's and men's health (and mental health) at uni. I look at each patient and their issues individually, I don't think anything specific everytime I see a man or a woman. The only place I see very polarising, extreme views on gender is this subreddit and some feminist posts. I would say maybe Australia is a bit backwards on the feminist (as in equality) cause maybe? Or maybe my friends and colleagues are just normal and I'm lucky!
/r/MensRights04/04/25 10:06 PM
4

I can understand this. But when this sub generalises such topics, they act in the same way as the extreme feminists they hate so much. If a woman (or a man) is disrespectful to you personally then dump them or don't be friends with them, it's that simple. Maybe it's because I'm not in the US that I don't see how bad it is, but I've got mostly decent people around me.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 06:24 AM
2

I can understand this. But when this sub generalises such topics, they act in the same way as the extreme feminists they hate so much. If a woman (or a man) is disrespectful to you personally then dump them or don't be friends with them, it's that simple. Maybe it's because I'm not in the US that I don't see how bad it is, but I've got mostly decent people around me.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 06:24 AM
-17

Correction, I did not demand it for myself. You guys want all women to be grateful for all that men do, including you, whether or not you are worth it. Why so many topics make these generalisations, it's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 03:21 AM
-28

I did not demand gratitude. OP did. Maybe read again?
/r/MensRights03/04/25 10:05 PM
-43

What a load of crap. Maybe you should open a book and read what women have contributed to human advancement over the years. Maybe you should be grateful for them. What have you contributed personally that makes you think that you deserve recognition for? You're saying women don't differentiate between 'good and bad' men but that's exactly what your post is doing.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 09:15 PM
1

Thanks. That's the main issue with Reddit unfortunately, this sub is not the only one. Reddit discourages dialogue in general and instead promotes everyone sticking to their echochamber. It's a shame because I do agree with some of the issues brought up in this sub, even if I was not aware of them originally.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 10:34 PM
0

I'm not saying your comment specifically, just in general I find the sub quite close-minded. Hence the downvotes even for simple questions. I don't get why a lack of health awareness is labeled as misandry. There are so many areas where healthcare could be improved, not just for men for everyone. I don't think it comes from hate of men.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 05:23 AM
0

Like why? Why is this subreddit so upset with any possible question? You can still highlight men's issues while aknowledging the advantages men do have. You can talk about men without demonising women. These attitudes is why a lot of people are not gonna care about men's problems.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 05:00 AM
2

Thanks for responding to my question instead of downvoting.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 12:36 AM
3

Thanks for answering my question instead of downvoting.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 12:35 AM
-3

I know this one, I wanted more examples regarding healthcare.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 12:34 AM
2

Thanks for actually responding to my question instead of downvoting.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 12:32 AM
3

But why is it misandry then? Not just government doing a bad job informing the population on health matters in general? Lots of people also choose to ignore symptoms and most of the time, it's men.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 12:29 AM
-28

How is less health awareness misandry, when many wives will push their husband to go see a doctor? Can you give an example of the health benefits and health departments you say are not balanced? I have not seen this view before, I've only seen the opposite.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 07:53 PM
4

Omg that is really bad healthcare. Consent should never be assumed even for simple or routine procedures, options should be established and discussed to empower patient's choice. That is quite sad. I was expecting it was just the parents that were set in their ways, following trends, etc. Not that it came from professionals. It is so weird then why are the US so different to the rest of the world where we have slowly stopped doing this apart from religious?
/r/MensRights07/03/25 06:34 AM
6

I did not say she should not practice ever. That's up to more experienced people than me to decide what is fair. Not just for her, for patients, and for the reputation of the profession. But this process needs to happen, saying it's fine and it can just happen to anyone and shrugging it off is not acceptable. Health professionals need to have the highest standards in regards to patient respect and privacy. Such attitudes are hurting the profession, the patient's trust, and in the end the patient…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 01:36 AM
10

It could not have been a clueless mistake. Med schools and nursing schools drill into you to respect patients. They tell you repeadly not to post on socials in uniform, with patients, that you are responsible for the image of the profession. If someone can't follow such a simple rule, how are they to understand more difficult ones?
/r/MensRights06/03/25 10:34 PM
20

Not just a favour to men, all her future patients. So unprofessional.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 10:31 PM
1

Yes, but still.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 11:40 PM
4

He botched at least 2 other surgeries before, including one that caused the death of the patient.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 08:29 AM
1

Tissue was damaged and dying, not possible to reattach. Leaving it would have caused the child's death.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 08:28 AM
2

The surgeon was also in his 60s and had botched at least 2 surgeries before, one of them resulting in the death of the patient. Horrifying that he was still practicing.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 08:27 AM
9

If you are in the US, can you please explain what is the doctor's advice you received? Is it parents that make this decision, or is it pushed by medical staff?
/r/MensRights05/03/25 08:25 AM
10

Fingers would get infected though. Teeth is better example. It's like removing teeth from kids because a small percentage of people don't brush their teeth.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 08:21 AM
2

I do actually if I hear 'all men are bad'. The feminism reddit isn't quite like that though, not that I've seen.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:39 AM
1

Not saying it is ok, but it can be difficult to get over your own biases. That's just a fact.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 07:26 AM
0

Thanks. The world is even more fucked up than I thought it was.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 10:08 AM
-1

I did not praise it... Read again. And then one more time.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 09:56 AM
-7

I do not downplay it, I would not want it for myself and I think that countries that have abandoned it are right. I simply explain why you can't compare both, and why their ban has taken different routes. I was also not involved before that comment was made.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 07:06 AM
1

I am talking about gang rape and homelessness. Not about a family member abusing a child. I know these cases exist, I have never said the contrary.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 06:52 AM
-5

Here's one. Love how I get downvoted for stating facts all the time. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1iynj21/comment/mezsc9m/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights01/03/25 06:37 AM
-1

It is my understanding that there are far many more cases of rapes, especially if you look at underreported, than murders. That is one reason why you can't really replace the words. Still, if there are subgroups of men that kill together, they obsviously think it is okay. Like gangs. Gangs are not okay either. Rape jokes help with the normalisation. It is not nice to hear for women or men that have such traumas. It is not funny online or in real life. It is far too common, even in high schools. …
/r/MensRights01/03/25 06:34 AM
-2

A lot of women keep quiet too. Some women come forward. Some women also die from gang rape and rape.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 06:19 AM
-2

Tell me about it, I can't understand you either. This is not English -> 'How is my this my logic?' There is a trivialising culture about rape, that is why rape jokes and gang rapes and rape threats are so common, and deemed 'so funny'. That is not okay, and you shouldn't pretend it does not exist. How are you going to magically solve men's rate of suicide as you claim? That one should be interesting.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 06:16 AM
0

It is a real issue. I am not trivialising it - if I had the same logic as you, I would say 'it is also an issue for women'. There is a huge lack of support for all mental health patients in general. I don't think any of them can be 'easily solved', including suicides in men, but the lack of support is definitely an issue.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 02:59 AM
-5

I am sorry for what happened to you. I never said women do not do this, read my comment again.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 01:46 AM
-1

'It would be absurd for me to conclude that based on this fact alone, that Western societies hold a widespread cultural belief that killing homeless men is acceptable.' No, but it would not be absurb to say that some groups of people regard violence against homeless people as not important. Or to say some regard them as less than human. Some subgroups thinking this is already too many. And it happens that they escape justice in many cases even when the evidence is blatant. I do not believe men a…
/r/MensRights01/03/25 01:27 AM
-1

'If all that it takes is a few guys who did...' It's more than a few guys here and there. Your comment is trivialising. Just like women saying 'men's issues are fake' are triviliasing as well.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 01:23 AM
1

That's plain rude and stereotypes. What part of the job do you actually want to take on? If it aligns with them, I would probably say nothing and avoid them the next time around, maybe email the professor later on. If the technical stuff requires more time and you don't think it is your strength, speak up, say your strengths and weaknesses. Keep away from the guys do this and girls do that, talk about yourself. For everyone's interest, just remain polite and respectful even if other people are a…
/r/MensRights01/03/25 12:28 AM
-1

There are many, many stories of gang rapes. Men that are oblivious to it and have never participated in anything close to it are probably good men, until they decide to try and deny these facts just because they have not seen it in their personal lives.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 12:13 AM
-3

I am talking about the scale. Men rapists rape homeless women because there will be no consequence, no one will listen to them. The scale of it is disgusting if you listen to their testimony. I am stilll waiting on a source showing women gang raping a man. The fact that some subgroups do it together proves that there is some kind of cultural agreements in some parts of the population.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 12:11 AM
1

87% of homicides are committed by men, check the numbers again. The 13% of female offenders are important as well, I did not say it wasn't. But your article as a whole invalidates OP's post.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 12:05 AM
1

Sorry, this is my mistake, I should have said random women. Your source proves my point, men are more violent. Male offender/Male victim 65.3% Male offender/Female victim 22.7% Female offender/Male victim 9.6% Female offender/Female victim 2.4% Edit: comments I deleted were the same just formatting of the table did not work.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 11:52 PM
1

Sorry, this is my mistake, I should have said random women. Your source proves my point, men are more violent. || || |Male offender/Male victim|65.3%| |Male offender/Female victim|22.7%| |Female offender/Male victim|9.6%| |Female offender/Female victim| 2.4% | 2.4%
/r/MensRights28/02/25 11:51 PM
1

Sorry, this is my mistake, I should have said random women. Your source proves my point, men are more violent. || || |Male offender/Male victim|65.3%| |Male offender/Female victim|22.7%| |Female offender/Male victim|9.6%| |Female offender/Female victim| 2.4% |
/r/MensRights28/02/25 11:51 PM
-5

I do not believe all women. But I don't assume they are all liars either. I leave that to the court, which are definitely not always right, but are probably more informed than I am. You say there is no rape culture. How can gang rape happen then, when guys decide they will be ok with each other doing it? Why is there so many accounts of homeless women being raped? Why so many rape and unrapeable jokes? Why rape threat feminists instead of proving them wrong? Correct me if I'm wrong but I've neve…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 11:03 PM
-16

How can gang rape happen then, when guys decide they will be ok with each other doing it? Why is there so many accounts of homeless women being raped? Why so many rape and unrapeable jokes? Why rape threat feminists instead of proving them wrong? Correct me if I'm wrong but I've never seen a man being gang raped by women. Nor have I seen a case of a homeless man being raped by a woman. You can't draw any meaningful conclusion about your experience alone. Anyone downvoting this without showing me…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:53 PM
-10

I have seen that here. Not about rape, but comments calling for legalising FGM for the 'sake of balance' if MGM can't be banned. That's sick.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:47 PM
-4

Psychology has its problems because studying the brain is the most difficult thing there is in the human body. But it's the best we've got to treat people with psychological conditions. Some treatments are controversial, some work really well. So no, it is definitely not best to ignore it entirely. Feel free to research the brain yourself and come up with something better if you can.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:42 PM
1

And by who are men and women victimised on the street? By men mostly I would guess, not by women. If you have proof of the contrary, please share. I agree with DV and the rates seem to be quite similar for each gender. But my point still stands, the most horrific cases I see are always men.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 09:27 PM
0

There is no need to hate on women to validate men's experiences. Not all women pretend to be perfect. A lot of them are victims of abuse, no one can seriously deny that. How about putting shame on abusers instead regardless of gender?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 09:21 PM
0

I am sorry to hear. Sharing is a personal choice of course, but it is also the only way things will change. Women have faced a lot of backlash for sharing their experiences in the past, it's only stating to change now. It can change for men victims too.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 09:18 PM
22

Exactly. If they really need a slogan, what about 'misogyny kills, misandry kills'. It's true without denying any truths and will be more accepted.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 11:27 AM
2

Thanks for the links, I had not read this point of view before regarding child abuse. Not sure why I get downvoted while asking for sources when it should be the norm to base opinions on facts and proofs but anyway.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 09:53 AM
2

I am sorry you feel that way, it seems that you have had bad experiences in relationships with your previous partners. I want you to know that it should not be your sole responsibility to provide for a household, this is an outdated ideology. You should pursue relationships (partner or friends) where you can be open about your emotions and share your experiences. If you cannot do that, they are probably not worth your time. Find someone you can share everything with, with the aim to support each…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 07:35 AM
1

I truly can't read, it's too small even when zooming in. If you repost here I'm happy to try and help.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 04:28 AM
1

Show me one single article proving what you advance if it is not misinformation spread on reddit. I have shown you research of what medical professionals have proven at some point, and while most recognise today it was misguided, there was proof. Do the same please, show me proof.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:58 AM
2

Medical research has showed some benefits, which is why some people supported it, others not. Today we know that those benefits are minimum if not inexistant, if the child/person practices safe sex and good hygiene. Especially that sex is not an issue until the person can consent anyway. I am considering mostly the non-religious perspective of Western countries. I know the US is a bit of an outlier because it has not reduced the practice yet as other countries have.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:34 AM
2

How did you possibly get that from my comments... No, I do not imply that and do not believe that. I would not want it for myself if I was a man, nor would I want it for my child. Please read my comments again and let me know what I did not explain properly.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:15 AM
1

But it can't be genderless when anatomy is different and one has medical benefits that were argued for a long time. It just can't be equal. FGM was an 'easy' topic to solve because there is no medical benefits at all; MGM is more controversial because of the potential benefits that were argued for. I'm sure there are men that would argue against women advocating for changes on male issues anyway. Most feminists are against circumcision. I can show you links if you like.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:13 AM
3

"There are potential benefits that were debated by medical studies for male circumcision. I agree they should not be prioritised above the person's consent." --> this means I do NOT support it (like most feminists btw, I can show you links). Instead, I support consent and decision making by the person. Not by medical professionals, not by their parents.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:08 AM
1

I'm happy for you and thanks for sharing, sounds like your couple dynamic is very healthy. Good luck with your new job!
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/25 03:04 AM
2

Sounds to me like that was all you. He did not support your happiness at first, making you feel guilty, then later he did, which is great.
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/25 02:50 AM
1

Look at all these feminists opposed to circumcision. Lack of education is the problem in your country, not women. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/sbqewf/what_do_feminists_generally_think_about/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/8ua4h9/can_you_be_a_feminist_and_pro_circumcision/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/7toeej/why_cant_circumcision_be_equated_with_fgm_and_be/
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:33 AM
1

Where is the proof of what you are saying? You don't think parents make choices together? There are women advocating for it to be stopped, did you know that? https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/about-us/
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:18 AM
0

So a man advocated for this, and people listened to that instead of doctors like in other countries. Why is it blamed on women then?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 01:52 AM
0

It was for hygiene and to decrease STI; the benefits are controversial today. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3684945/ Show me a source that says it was to harm their sex life. I have not seen a single source except for commentors on this sub.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 01:43 AM
-2

The sources were justifying what I said, my claims were not about statistics, but about scale of violence. If you call a side 'main' you need to show numbers. There are constant unfunded claims on this sub and they are the reason feminists are not listening. You can't just make up these things. I have already agreed that trivialisation of female on male assault is a bad thing and it exists. Many women agree to this.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 01:41 AM
1

What part of there has never been a believed benefit for girls do you not understand? Doctors thought they were doing the right thing based on evidence. There is new research that makes it controversial and people's minds are changing. There are many, many other inequalities in health against women, be aware of those as well, don't paint it like we're winning.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 12:12 AM
0

The why does matter because that is how you fight disinformation. Educate them respectfully. Regarding FGM I'm just copying this again. ----------- Stop comparing FGM and MGM like they're the same. Nothing about sex is gender neutral. There are potential benefits that were debated by medical studies for male circumcision. I agree they should not be prioritised above the person's consent, and that is why the practice was and is controversial, and has been widely abandoned in the West (not the US …
/r/MensRights28/02/25 12:06 AM
-2

You are making a lot of assumptions without any sources based solely on your own experience and thinking. Yet I cite 2 sources and get downvoted. You conclude without any argument that male assaulting women are the victims because. You will not convince a single woman with that type of comment.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 12:01 AM
1

I'm just copying this again. Yes it started in religion, then it was justified for health resaons, then it became controversial and got dropped in many countries. Medical research evolves with time. ----------- Stop comparing FGM and MGM like they're the same. Nothing about sex is gender neutral. There are potential benefits that were debated by medical studies for male circumcision. I agree they should not be prioritised above the person's consent, and that is why the practice was and is contro…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 11:54 PM
1

People here are inciting anti-women and anti-feminist sentiment that are not useful either. There are women doctors and nurses that fight for abolishing circumcision while some men just comment on reddit that the cause is 'women prefer how it looks' instead of doing something useful. Show me a feminist group that lobbies for circumcision, I have not seen any. But I do see the US government erasing and stopping medical evidence and research. I agree with you on religion but it will be more diffic…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 11:49 PM
-3

Do you have a link to an article or a study? Genuinely curious.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 11:42 PM
-1

Wish I could double upvote.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 08:27 AM
2

Most people -> only in your country (I am assuming your are in the USA). Other Western countries have widely abandoned the practice because it is backwards and the benefits are close to nil with good hygiene and sex education. The USA is backwards is is becoming even more so. Doctors do advocate for the right approach but obviously they are not always listened to, because misinformation & social media.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:54 AM
5

I think the saddest thing here is that both men and women have very low rates of reporting it.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:49 AM
1

It is not funny. TV shows and movies show us that minor abuse is funny and / or acceptable. They have done better for women, they need to do better for men. They should be a model of respect for everyone, then it will make its way into society.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:41 AM
3

Adults that enjoy this probably have a problem. None of this is funny. Children learn by repeating what they see and they make it look acceptable to do these things. I'm actually the one pointing it out to my partner while he's laughing.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:30 AM
-4

Men should share their experience, I am here because I want to know about it. I have had some good discussions. I have also seen some ignorance and misinformation here as well, men and women are probably equal in that respect. Yay. Perhaps calling them stupid and morons is not helping making them want to listen to you.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:26 AM
1

I assumed the 'they' was reffering the women, perhaps I was wrong. The fact that it 'pleases women' keeps being repeated here and above yet it has nothing to do with the religious / outdated medical reasons behind the practice. A lot of commentors do blame women on this very thread because they 'only fought for themselves' which is absurd to even compare. And before someone comes at me and say it is the same, I'll copy what I wrote somewhere else. ----- Stop comparing FGM and MGM like they're th…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:21 AM
-29

My understanding is that women on men violence is mostly intimate partner violence, correct me if I'm wrong. So in most cases, men will rarely experience violence from random women (edited: women). Women do all the time. Any person with personal trauma may have a tendency to generalise, it is not a choice. We all have multiple friends that have experienced it. Another thing is the scale of the atrocities committed. Happy to be corrected on this but the most horrific cases I have ever seen were c…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:15 AM
-2

Stop comparing FGM and MGM like they're the same. Nothing about sex is gender neutral. There are potential benefits that were debated by medical studies for male circumcision. I agree they should not be prioritised above the person's consent, and that is why the practice was and is controversial, and has been widely abandoned in the West (not the US though -> both women and men are fighting for it to change). Patient's consent was not really a big deal not that long ago, which explains why it wa…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 06:36 AM
0

You have obviously not read my comment right. I have cited you 2 articles, go and read them. I'll wait for your sources that claim what you say, but I won't be too surprised if there are none. Good luck with your life.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:16 AM
0

Please read above comment and understand it. Also please try to use punctuation, it's really difficult to read what you write.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:10 AM
1

Thanks for the details. One more reason that proves he hates women and men. It's a shame feminists and men worried about men's rights and minorities could not be enough to vote him out. He is bringing your whole country back to the darkness of the middle ages.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:08 AM
1

Thanks for the clarification, I do not know that much about the US. Let me guess, the states with high circumcision rates are Trump voters?
/r/MensRights27/02/25 04:27 AM
-1

Stop comparing FGM and MGM like they're the same. Nothing about sex is gender neutral. There are potential benefits that were debated by medical studies for male circumcision. I agree they should not be prioritised above the person's consent, and that is why the practice was and is controversial, and has been widely abandoned in the West (not the US though -> fight for it to change). Patient's consent was not really a big deal not that long ago, which explains why it was not considered. It is be…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 04:25 AM
0

But why? Is it because they are repeated whatever they saw on tiktok or is there an actual reason? I agree with what you say on hygiene reasons, that is why I said 'assuming'. There was a medical reasoning other than 'women like how it looks'. Hysterectomies would prevent them from having children, so no it has never been suggested. I can find you examples though how women have been negatively impacted by medical research too if you really need to balance the scale.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 04:22 AM
3

Great, then do your part, if a woman tells you a degrading comment, educate her respectfully. Send her some study links. Maybe don't date her.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 04:17 AM
1

I am not sure what you mean?
/r/MensRights27/02/25 04:14 AM
-1

It's not propaganda, it is based on medical research that evolves through time and sometimes makes mistakes. The concern for consent of the person is something that becomes more and more important and that is a good thing, and that is what is driving some changes. But it does not mean that researchers had a bias they wanted to validate. I could not tell you how many mistakes were made against women in medical research because they were centered around men.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 04:12 AM
-1

I agree with this but stop blaming women for double standards. Fight for the change instead. Stop comparing FGM and MGM like they're the same. Nothing about sex is gender neutral. There are potential benefits that were considered by medical studies for male circumcision. I agree they should not be prioritised above the person's consent, and that is why the practice was and is controversial, and has been widely abandoned in the West (not the US though -> fight for it to change). However there has…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:59 AM
1

Nothing about sex is gender neutral. There are potential benefits that were considered by medical studies for male circumcision. I agree they should not be prioritised above the person's consent, and that is why the practice was and is controversial, and has been widely abandoned in the West (not the US though -> fight for it to change). However there has NEVER been a discussed medical benefit for the female genital mutilation. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3684945/ https://www.who.in…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:56 AM
-1

I am assuming your are in the USA, where a lot of people do not want to look at medical research and evidence. You are doing it right here. And women that want men circumcised are doing it too. The country's problem is not women, it's a lack of education.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:44 AM
2

Look at these women part of this organisation fighting circumcision as a barbaric practice. They care that much. They are doctors and nurses so I am assuming they are worthy enough in your eyes. Mothers care a lot too. You should care about what they think. https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/about-us/
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:41 AM
2

The West has decreased this practice so much that it is the norm to be uncircumsized. But not in the USA where it is the opposite. Your country (assuming it is your country) needs to change.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:38 AM
3

Some women are influenced by the misinformation and bigotry that is rampant in the US. Just like some men. Fight for that to change. Some women actually fight for it alongside men.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:34 AM
-1

Uneducation in the US plays a huge role as well. Especially sexual education. Not sure it will self correct under such a great president as Trump, where people believe less and less in medical studies and science.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:33 AM
0

What about fight for your rights instead of pushing for cruelty for the other sex for the sake of balance? wtf. Make your country move forward not backwards into bigotry and torture. Stop lumping women into the same category, some of them fight against the practice of circumcision alongside men, while all your are doing is being hateful on reddit which progresses nothing.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:31 AM
1

It was not meant to improve their sex life, it was for hygiene and / or religious reasons. But I agree the practice is outdated and that is why it has decreased a lot in most Western countries. Fight for it to change in the USA too instead of blaming feminists. They fight for other problems, protecting the mutilation of infants is not one of them. Be angry at your bigoted government instead.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:28 AM
-5

As much as you seem to want to believe, women did not create this problem. Some women take this very seriously and are fighting to abolish these practices in the US (look at the link as an example). Are you doing anything? https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/about-us/
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:24 AM
-4

The message you got from what? From one or two women? Women fought for their rights, do the same. Fight disinformation. Inform mothers, they actually care. https://www.reddit.com/r/TooAfraidToAsk/comments/tzp90t/is_not_being_circumcised_in_the_us_really_a_big/
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:19 AM
-2

Most western countries have abandoned that practice. Fight for it in the US for the norm to change. Parents need to be aware of the risks. The US has a massive problem with healthcare disinformation and it seesm to be getting worse. Instead of complaining against women, inform mothers because they care, see link below. https://www.reddit.com/r/TooAfraidToAsk/comments/tzp90t/is_not_being_circumcised_in_the_us_really_a_big/
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:18 AM
-2

Then fight for it to not be the norm like women did. Other countries have changed, the USA can too.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:12 AM
5

It is done for religious and hygiene reasons. The hygiene thing based mostly on assuming that men can't wash themselves properly. The practice has been abandoned in most Western countries, apart from religious practices. But not in the USA. A lot of women do not care how it looks as long as it's clean. Your enemy is not women, it's your government.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:11 AM
1

For hygiene reason, because it is easier to clean (men can get issues but the practice is still very controversial). It is assuming men can't be taught to wash themselves. Outside of the US the practice has been laregly abandoned outside of religious practices.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:08 AM
1

I've never done these 2 so I'm super keen, I really liked RE1 and RE4. Not a big fan of the later ones though.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:47 AM
1

Is that a book you recommend reading? Or do you have another recommendation?
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:43 AM
1

You can choose to believe this if you like but it does not make it true. It is like saying all men are the same.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:41 AM
2

Omg I didn't even get it until I read your other comment! shame on meeee hahaha you should've said Barry cause that's the sandwich moment!
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:14 AM
2

You bet! One of my favourite traumas.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:12 AM
6

I know that's why I shared. There's some bad things and good things.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 12:23 PM
17

Why wait when you can already do this? It is worth reading. There are also videos on Youtube. https://www.reddit.com/r/asktransgender/comments/tu0n48/trans_men_what_was_something_you_didnt_expect/
/r/MensRights26/02/25 12:08 PM
11

From someone that has had a stressful career and worked long hours: the most important thing is sleep and whatever small change you can do to promote good and sufficient sleep. Also don't bring up issues when they are sleep-deprived. Gym and diet also help in general, and with sleep.
/r/RedPillWomen26/02/25 11:38 AM
2

Household + kids is a lot more work than a full time job.
/r/RedPillWomen26/02/25 11:18 AM
0

I'm not sure about the US but it seems like (assuming) your country is not really progressive, women are losing a lot of rights at the moment. In Australia the definition of rape is different than the definition of sexual assault. It's not about the gender, it is about the act. Forced penetration can happen to men. The acts are very different, I am assuming there is a difference in sentences too. Child custody should probably be a case by case, looking at the way the each parent treat their kids…
/r/MensRights26/02/25 06:31 AM
1

I will call it if I see it online. I do actually with my friends and colleagues, but 'all men are bad' does not come around very often. Most discussions I have been a part of were on particular people and particularly horrific cases. The fact that most of those were men is meaningful and does need to be addressed. According to feminist theory, solving men's issues is part of the solution.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 05:27 AM
0

Then I'm sorry to say but you have shit friends. If you can't open up and have a real discussion about anything with them then they are not your friends. Freezing when violence happens around you is a thing and no one should be called less than a man or less than a woman or a coward for it, especially people have not been put in these situations. Everyone should probably try and react if they can to protect each other but freezing is a real phenomenon that needs to be studied more. A lot of comm…
/r/MensRights26/02/25 05:06 AM
1

But that's my point not all feminists are radical feminists, it's a diverse group with very diverse ideas. A lot of people will call themselves feminists after being made aware of certain cases of violence against women. And there is no shortage of examples there. Women get threaten all the time online simply for calling themselves feminists even if they care about men too. That does not make them want to listen to men's issues.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 01:36 AM
0

I hear you and I know some women are like this but these issues should be brought up at a relationship level to see what is expected of the other, without assuming what the other wants because of their gender. Every relationship would benefit from this. That is what some feminists want, for both genders to benefit.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 01:29 AM
1

The loudest people will be the first to go to protests and the first you see on TV. It is the same for any societal issue. It is true that there are hateful men and hateful women, if you only look at those you just become one of them.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 01:24 AM
-5

Most feminists want to remove societal traditions that are bad, including on how it treats men poorly.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 08:42 PM
-5

The feminist cause is quite diverse, some of them do acknowledge the societal issues men face. If you call them all pieces of shiit, you have the same mentality that radical feminists take when they say all men are shiit.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 08:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter