TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jimbolauski Archive

View 0 posts and 158 comments by jimbolauski on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

I.e. men perform more of the revenue generating labor.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 10:51 PM
4

They could have a commerical for female hygiene products and berate women for standing with rapists.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 05:37 PM
7

The theme of the article was women are to weak to conscent. Does that mean she thinks women shouldn't be signing contracts or making any finincial decisions?
/r/MensRights11/02/23 01:30 AM
10

The number of sets shouldn't determine pay. The revenue the matches bring in should. If the women can bring in more revenue in fewer sets they should be paid accordingly. Reality is that the women bring in less revenue and should be paid accordingly.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 02:56 PM
2

You don't go from having no tools to having all the tools in a year or even a decade. You collect them over a lifetime, picking up a few here and there for each new project.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 03:57 AM
1

I assume some people were triggered
/r/MensRights20/09/21 05:40 PM
0

If you want to set them off just say. If all men were bad you wouldn't be able to vote.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 12:50 AM
2

11
/r/MensRights26/07/21 06:41 PM
26

Out of the 26 members of the Senate armed services committee it was two Republicans and a Democrat that voted against it. There's not some huge conservative opposition to this.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 09:16 PM
6

Back when I was in shape and could bike at a decent pace it was normal to pass someone and have them come with me. Long rides get monotonous and someone passing usually snapped people out of their trance. Some would pull beside and talk others would tuck in. I guess I never found offense in someone wanting to challenge themselves.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 03:50 PM
7

More people need to realize how broken the system is before the system can change.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 01:53 AM
2

Paid suspension
/r/MensRights23/02/20 10:15 PM
1

The prenup and marriage are all one contract, the prenup is just defining the exit clauses.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 11:52 PM
0

Explain how barter does not fit into your definition of coersion?
/r/MensRights17/01/20 02:30 PM
0

he wouldn't do x unless I did y is still force So a gas station not giving me a candy bar unless I give them money is coersion.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 11:01 AM
1

Where's the threat of force used to pressure the signing of the contract?
/r/MensRights17/01/20 02:06 AM
4

That's not coersion, unless you think buying a candy bar from the gas station is coersion.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 12:12 PM
3

She just happened to have her students, cell phone number/user name. That's totally normal and is no way a sign of grooming.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 03:59 PM
3

Daycare facilities are able to watch 10 infants per 1 adult and 20 toddlers per 1 adult. I'm not seeing a whole days work or even a half day.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 12:17 PM
3

How much does a person have to make where you require them to skip the birth of their child?
/r/MensRights08/10/19 01:44 AM
0

The u15 team would be kids born in 2003 and later. At that age there is a big difference in size and speed between the u14s and u15s. The club they played was a top club in Dallas and wouldn't have depth issues necessitating a u14 play up. The team would only have 14 year olds and a few who just turned 15 when they played.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 02:20 AM
2

My latest rant is about how GenX grew up watching Heman, Transformers, GI Joe... while Milenials had Barney. Those couldn't be two more different outlooks on life and in my opinion was the beginning of millennials troubles dealing with a world that's not lovey dovey.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 12:15 PM
1

Garbage play is not the problem, it's the entitlement that they should be compensated equally to the men even though the play is equal to u15 men's.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 02:56 AM
21

The media is worried justice will be served the same way rape allegations are handled.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 01:30 AM
113

Mein Kamph was just one of the 20 papers submitted and is less controversial than many of the others. 7 were accepted, 4 more required revisions before before acceptance, 7 were rejected and 2 were still in the review process when they went public with their study. Many papers advocated highly dubious ethics including training men like dogs (“Dog Park”), punishing white male college students for historical slavery by asking them to sit in silence in the floor in chains during class and to be exp…
/r/MensRights05/10/18 10:38 AM
2

Minimal police and fire, no electricity or running water. Society needs men to function.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 03:01 PM
-1

And democrats didn't so it's safe to assume he acted within his authority.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 09:22 AM
0

Did McConnell have the authority to do so?
/r/MensRights18/09/18 12:43 AM
0

The Republicans decided not to approve Garland, they had the power to do so, Republicans currently have the power to approve a nomination and are choosing to do so. What is the scam? That one party choose to use the power afforded to them by the constitution.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 10:17 PM
4

How is it a scam? Is the president allowed to nominate a judge? Do the Republicans in Congress have the power to approve the nomination?
/r/MensRights17/09/18 01:46 PM
7

My daughter is in girl scouts and is going on a 2 night camping trip this weekend. The money they made from selling cookies pays for this trip and the 5 day summer camp as well. The activities I did when I was in boy scouts and what she is doing now are very similar.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:25 AM
9

Her weight was a big issue, she was carrying an etra 40 lbs of weight, that's more stress on her joints, more effort to hike, more calories she has to carry. Her attitude certianly didn't help but the phyiscal demands were to much for her.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:35 PM
2

Teachers unions have protections for teachers that they will not be fired for accusations.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 12:27 PM
12

There's more to scouts then just the training. It was a place where boys could be boys, a place where boys could find themselves as they became men. On top of that at every meeting where there is a female scout there will have to be a female scout leader. Two adults are required and at least one adult that is the same gender. Now scouts are being led by people who have never been in scouts.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 11:26 AM
8

Our HR negotiates health ins, dental ins, and 401k plans, advocates for employees for rejected ins claims, drafts employee handbooks changes, maintains employee records...She does this part time from home a thousand miles away for our 60 person company. I doubt we'll need a HR department until we reach 200 employees.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 11:23 AM
7

The issue is there were 4 guests that checked in with the same name as she was given. At least 3 of them are not involved and have a right to privacy. Her right to child support does not out weigh uninvolved parties right to privacy. I suspect the outcome would be different if she could uniquely identify one of the guests.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:13 PM
20

Promoting a less qualified person because they are a women is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 11:56 AM
2

Yes it was one of the policies that Giuliani used to clean up New York.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 10:31 AM
1

The hilarious part is that self avowed feminist has actually created a rape culture protecting her husband. I can't even imagine the mental gymnastics feminists needed to support her. This is corroborated by five contemporaneous witnesses -- in 1978, Bill Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick in a Little Rock, Arkansas, hotel room, then, as he was leaving, looked at her bloody lip and said, "Better put some ice on that" about three weeks after that rape, Hillary cornered Broaddrick at a party and sai…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 10:59 AM
10

He was so disappointed he withheld DNA evidence exonerating every player on that team. He was disbarred and imprisoned for his actions.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:24 AM
4

If those stats are correct it would mean it takes women 7xs as long to do the same housework as a man.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 01:26 PM
8

I find "Gender Studies" so insulting because it does not study both genders in any meaningful way. Sure they do they study how men are oppressive closet rapists and how women are oppressed by them.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 09:56 PM
0

So how do you know he got scholarship? Or are you just assuming he did? I know a couple of the kids on the team.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 03:50 AM
0

You found not one person that finished in the top 5 and didn't recieve offers. Your only claim against it is yourself but in this version of your HS running carrer you claimed you didn't finish in the top 5 so I don't know why it's relevant, you must have gotten confused with another lie where you claimed you finished in the top 5. I simply went to OSUs roster found a freshman that did not finish in the top 5 at state and still managed to get a scholarship. That pretty much speaks for my point i…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 02:28 PM
1

If I'm stupid and I caught you in a lie what does that make you.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 01:35 PM
1

The 3k is not an Olympic event the 3,000 is. 3k, 5k, 10k, all are road or trail courses the 3,000, 5,000, 10,000 are on a track. It's just one more little thing that you would know if you were who you claimed you were.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 12:59 PM
0

You who was "good" not great was bragging about a 3k time which is niether a highschool cross country, track, or Olympic event, strange that you didn't know that. Then you make up stories about how fast you were but you failed to make state even though you could have run 3 or 4 seconds off your 800 pr and still qualified for state. You have no credibility and still can't give a name of a runner who finished top 5 and didn't get any offers from top tier schools.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 04:07 AM
0

I don't remember my exact highschool times because I don't value them you obviously value high school accomplishment which is why you would embelish them.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 10:00 AM
0

Care to find a counter example? Go find a runner that finished in the top 5 at state that didn't get offers from top schools. I realize that this is all subterfuge to hide your exageration of your high school times.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 02:20 AM
0

Those times are in line with their posted walk on times you do know what a walk on is don't you?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:45 AM
0

The walk on standard is ment to discourage people from trying out, coaches don't like to cut people. They have a freshman his highschool prs 800 1:59 1600 4:18 3200 9:24 he's on scholarship. He was no where near 5th place at state yet he managed to get a scholarship to a p5 school. You're embarrassing yourself quit digging a hole.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 11:24 PM
1

My 1:55 800 was not good enough to even qualify for state. Maybe from a weaker region I coulda went. My 4x8 team placed. My 4:23 mile qualified me but IIRC, it took 4:18 just to place. Every year in the 90s 1:55 would place at state in division 1, 1:58 will qualify in any region most years. Either you're embelishing your times and got caught or you choked at regionals and ran 3 seconds off your best time. Ohio division 1 state meet results 1st & 8th 1999 800 1:52-1:56 1600 4:12 - 4:21 1998 800 1…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:18 PM
1

I ran in college but for a lower D1 school, ohio university in the 90s, your claimed times were better then mine so you could have easily gotten a scholarship to Toledo. Your story simply doesn't add up you claim you were good not great but you would have finished in the top 5 at state. In ohio alone there are over 10 d1 schools that's about 30 scholarships. How can someone who was the 5th best in multiple events not be one of the top 30 seniors.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:00 PM
1

The times on the right were mens state finishing times in Ohio for 1st and 5th in 2012. I know for a fact that finishing in the top 5 at state in ohio will get you a full ride to just about any college of your choosing defiantly a p5 school. If you ran as fast as you claim you would have a full scholarship offer and possibly win state depending on which state you're from.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:31 AM
2

Lol, I ran track in high school. I was good, but not great. My best times were equivalent to the women's olympic gold medal runners in each event. If that was true you would have a scholarship to a good D1 school. Event womens Gold state 1st 5th 100m 10.75 10.76 10.99 200m 21.88. 21.61 21.90 400m 49.55. 47.44 49.02 800m 1:56 1:51 1:55 1500m 4:10 1600m 4:14 4:18
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:14 AM
3

If you would have bothered to read my original comment instead of getting overly emotional you would understand my point.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 01:03 AM
1

So was it one day the majority of men decided to give women the right to vote or were there probably always a group of men that thought women should vote?
/r/MensRights27/09/15 12:04 PM
3

If men didn't want women to vote how did women gain the right to vote?
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:28 AM
6

Oppression: the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner. Can you give examples where men as a whole have done this to women.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 11:02 PM
1

That would be true if they were held to the same standard men.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 11:26 PM
3

It's ONLY men that are having their lives directly put in danger for this policy.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:40 PM
5

Currently there are only men in combat roles, the study was about women joining men in combat roles. Those men will directly be harmed because of this policy.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:26 PM
10

It is if you're in the military and your life is put into more peril in the name of diversity.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:05 PM
0

Thinking the school is run by the student Senate. You should get out more.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:28 PM
2

The difference between republicans and democrats is that the media holds republicans accountable. That alone would make even someone as awful as trump a better option.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:26 PM
5

Obama didn't simmer to the top he was artificially elevated and any criticism was cast as racism.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:22 PM
2

They probably have naming rights to OU, since they are one of the oldest universities, they took Ohio state to court because they were trying to call themselves Ohio. The "the Ohio State" got started because of the lawsuit.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 01:00 AM
0

OU is Ohio university, one of the oldest public schools in the US.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:31 AM
2

One of the main gripes in the female anti feminism movement is that they see all women as victims. This is the perfect illustration of the feminist mindset that all women are victims.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 11:43 PM
3

Didn't Hamas leaders call for the complete destruction of Israel? That doesn't sound neighborly, how about firing missiles indiscriminately into populated areas. Neither side is innocent and you look just as foolish as someone who claims Israel is innocent in all this.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:35 AM
2

Employment contracts still exist in at will states, Mavericks, Cowboys, Spurs, Rangers, Texans, Astros, come to mind in Texas. Teachers unions are no different they exist and protect their employees.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 08:27 PM
3

Right to work just means there are no closed shops, people can choose to be in the union or not and work.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:33 PM
7

You can thank teachers unions for that.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:29 AM
0

There are many capable women in this world that don't need special treatment to succeed, comments like that are what creates division and animosity against MRAs.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 10:13 AM
5

Most people that are against abortions believe it's about child's life, it's not about a woman's right to choose it's about a living person. As for birth control the only objections are forcing people/employers to pay for it against their will.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 11:46 PM
17

I would say most conservatives are against special treatment which gets perverted into they are for traditional gender roles.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:19 PM
3

They can just molest/assault your child and end up in a reassignment center being paid to sit in a room and do nothing for months on end.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:40 PM
8

A bad employee at any other job doesn't have the power of the law and a retard-strength union behind them when they want to fuck someone's life over. Teachers sure do.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:11 PM
6

I would make sure to have an audio recording of the interview, that way there is no way you can be accused of misquoting.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:51 AM
2

I went to catholic school, what I would do to the disruptive students is not acceptable in public schools.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:07 PM
0

He will only be bullied in an environment where that is acceptable. It's the schools job to create such an environment and they are failing miserably.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:55 PM
2

So because there are bad people, the school should punish the kid by banning him from carrying his lunch box, while ignoring the bad kids.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:49 PM
8

I'll just address the ignorance line by line. Well, if the kid didnt want to get bullied, then he should learn to not bring the backpack to school. This statement shows your lack of understanding, giving the bullies a pass will only embolden them to find other things to torment kids for, but we can just ban those things, that'll fix it. In the real world, there is nobody to punish bullies, Just because you're too weak to stand up for someone else doesn't mean the the rest of civilization is as i…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:40 PM
4

I stopped reading after the site informed me my phone had a virus.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:22 PM
22

It is quite possible, and makes sense given the disperatre sentences. (I have only read this one article about the incident) So you believe her boyfriend took her car that she just killed 2 kids with without her knowledge to a car wash again without her knowing what he was doing. Are you really that naive?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:25 PM
2

So then you no longer think that witnessing an intoxicated person hop into the car and doing nothing is against the law. That's my point it doesn't matter the state of the males, there are very few laws compelling action.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 02:29 AM
3

What law requires a person to take the keys from an intoxicated person?
/r/MensRights26/01/14 12:01 AM
2

Then the girl should be expected to have the same sense as you when you were drunk off your ass and took keys. Any responsibility you put on the boys should put on the girl.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 02:29 PM
3

It is not their fault she made a bad decision. This relies on your original assumption being true. So witnessing an intoxicated person hop in the car, it is the legal responsibility of those people to stop them?
/r/MensRights25/01/14 02:25 PM
2

The only person that should be held accountable is the person that supplied the alcohol, unfortunately because the host is a female they have to find the responsible male party to charge. What law did they break? If the responsible males had decided the young lady couldn't make decisions for herself and had her stay at their house, I believe that is called kidnapping. Even if they just convinced her, she can't make decisions for herself, so she can't consent, so it's still kidnapping.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 02:19 PM
1

If that was the attitude on everything slavery would still be common, women would be treated like property...
/r/MensRights21/12/13 05:48 PM
1

Tax incentives for the married is a new idea so is a government employee officiating a wedding. Religious leaders officiating a wedding is as old as history. The government doesn't have to be involved in religious ceremonies.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 10:55 PM
-1

My point still stands that it would be trivial to get the government to stop discriminating based on marriage and the best solution is to stop the government from treating people different based on a religious sacrament.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 07:41 PM
0

When and how did the church give up marriage to the state?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 07:37 PM
-1

I don't support gay marriage nor do oppose it. I think the churches should decide who they want to perform the sacrament of marriage on. The government should not be performing religious sacraments nor should they treat people differently because they have received a sacrament. There are only a few areas where the government uses marriage in making their decisions, inheritance that is solved with a will, taxes just eliminate the married filing jointly or separately options, child custody is not …
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:33 AM
9

Unfortunately if a victim doesn't want to come forward, then nothing can be done. The accused has the RIGHT to face any witness against them, and question that witness. It seems like this was put in place to side step the justice system and just be a kangaroo court. IV Amendment In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been pre…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:46 AM
1

It was a penn state, Jerry Sandusky joke.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 07:40 PM
7

I've always heard the male version of a cougar is called a nittany lion.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:35 PM
2

As an alumni I can tell you the Athens pd won't care. One of their officers who was notoriously heavy handed slammed a handcuffed kid's face into a cement trashcan, no repercussions, that same officer took a minor on ride along and had his wife film them in the back of his car having sex. At the time she was 17 and Ohio's consent age was 18. He was not charged with anything not even misuse of government property. It's a good ole boys club down there.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 10:58 AM
2

This is the full quote. I wasn't questioning your intelligence in my last reply. I certainly did in the quote after that, but that was because you are too dense to understand it.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:57 PM
1

Questioning my intelligence is not an adult way to have a debate. I explained some of my critiques in another comment below. I wasn't questioning your intelligence in my last reply. If you stopped reading this article because it took too long for you to get the point, why would you read anything longer then a childrens book? It seemed like a pretty straight forward critique of your comment but I guess you were too slow to get it.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:52 AM
3

I take it you have never read anything longer then a children's book.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:30 AM
3

Did you read the post, they we're talking about birth control when he brought up that he was planning on getting a vasectomy. The doctor said make sure you are 100% sure as you should consider a vasectomy permanent, the doctor could not address the OP as the OP is not the patient. Where is the injustice? Married couples should make sure they are 100% on a permanent decision to no longer have children.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:07 AM
1

Weather it's a wife getting her tubes tied or a husband getting the snip, I would hope they talk to their spouses. I don't think the doctor implied or even thinks that your vasectomy is your wife's decision. The doctor is probably just making sure you and your wife are not making a snap decision.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 01:17 AM
0

He did not recieve compensation for pain and suffering or lost wages, he received compensation for being imprisoned. She was not imprisoned, why should she take away his compensation for being imprisoned. The 150k is more then enough compensation for the small burden she carried.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 11:50 PM
5

If a guy gets hit by a bus and divorces while in the hospital, then gets a settlement for the accident, should his ex get half. Half of the money that is supposed to go to his medical bills, half the money for compensation because he can't walk correctly... The settlement is for the pain and suffering he received for being wrongly imprisoned, if his wife feels she is entitled to compensation she needs to take it up with the state.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 11:07 AM
2

He did nothing wrong and was compensated by the state for the injustice. Why should he be forced to pay for the injustice the state put on his ex wife.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:55 AM
1

I know that's not what the situation is, I was responding to the holier than thou gp that thinks questioning your accuser is out of line. If the OP didn't do anything to warrant this then questioning his accuser is exactly what he should do.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 11:48 AM
11

You forgot don't make any statements to them without your lawyer present, they can easily turn we goof around and wrestle into something serious.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 04:23 PM
14

So you should be able to make accusations without any scrutiny?
/r/MensRights01/06/13 04:18 PM
5

Thou shalt not kill. Thou shall not commit adultery. Thou shall not covet thy neighbors wife.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:02 AM
14

Jail time time for assault is uncommon unless it's habitual or the injuries serious, she was paroled which is common for either sex with those charges.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:38 PM
1

Barging into a friends home, is significantly different from barging into a strangers home, that is not acceptable in any culture.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 11:51 PM
2

What kind of plumbers do you have that give you a week long window and just come right into your house unless you have given them consent to enter when you are not there, in which case you know they will be there. Your whole scenario is out of the realm of reality and thus your argument is as well.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:19 PM
1

Your whole point was there is nothing to fear from a stranger rummaging through your house, my point is just because they are there to rob you doesn't mean they won't harm you when you catch them in your house.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 09:49 PM
1

Getting blind drunk and making herself an easy target
/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:56 PM
3

No plumber would ever enter your house uninvited, further you would know that a plumber is coming over, your straw man fails the reality check.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:52 PM
2

Using your flawed logic, if you catch a burglar there is no reason to run away either, they only want your stuff and you and your children are perfectly safe.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:33 PM
2

I'm not saying the criticism for deadly force is right just that it happens. Here is an article where a mother hiding in the attic with her children was criticized for shooting the intruder when he discovered them hiding. http://www.alligator.org/opinion/columns/article_d5d4f286-5dfe-11e2-b3c1-0019bb2963f4.html?TNNoMobile
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:28 PM
-16

Any body that beats up a person that breaks into their house and tries to harm them will be criticized for excessive force in two instances one is deadly force, the other is beating them up when they are all ready subdued.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 11:03 AM
1

I never understood why holding the victim responsible for her bad decisions is blaming the victim. When you say there are bad people out there so putting yourself in situations where you are at the mercy of those bad people is stupid is not victim blaming, it's just being honest about the situation.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:41 PM
4

how does this show that feminism hurts women? If cheerleading was a sport cheerleaders would get scholarships, trainers, and other protections that athletes get. also, how is this a men's rights issue? There are male cheerleaders, and because cheerleading has a girly girl reputation they don't get the same treatment as other athletes.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 03:34 PM
3

When comparing cheerleading with other sports you have to look at being hurt and injured, with football and rugby many more players get hurt (bruises), falling from 6-8 feet in the air causes injuries, a far higher percentage of cheerleaders get injured then any other sport. Many other sports have made strides in making the sport safer while keeping it enjoyable, rugby has outlawed most dangerous tackling same with football. Cheerleading has not made the same efforts because feminists have issue…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 03:28 PM
2

I'm sorry man or woman. But all the butthurt and emotional arguments don't change reality. Using the word custody, wasn't meant to imply that it's not jail. You're barking up the wrong semantic tree. Non-compliance with a court order will land you in jail. Not for debt, but for contempt. Or for violation of a law that says that you must pay your child support. That's still semantics, the bottom line is pay or go to jail. Rule 1. Don't stick your dick in the crazy. Not even once. Rule 2. Don't pu…
/r/MensRights14/02/13 11:58 AM
1

If it was David Allen Coe she might be right.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 09:44 PM
8

How misogynistic of her to expect the man to pay for everything.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 09:41 PM
4

The women couldn't handle raising their child which is why they asked the state for assistance who in turn went after the father.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 03:07 AM
2

What other crimes would you include, what other professions should be included having a government list lacks flexibility and will put people at risk. I prefer a jury of peers or a judge making the decision on what crimes should follow a person over bureaucrats making those decisions.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 02:38 PM
0

You can't have it both ways, it would be impossible to retain records of crimes for positions of trust and not have them be public. The list is pretty extensive for all the groups that would need access and what crimes should be retained, there would be many grey areas that would not be accounted for. The only other option would be to destroy the records and rely on the honor system, which is a bad idea for obvious reasons. Personally any felonies that were committed should not be scrubbed, ever…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 11:17 AM
1

I would be infavor of hard jail time for people like sharpton.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 10:57 AM
2

You just said their record should be cleared once they become an adult. Either their actions as a minor are whipped clean or they should be held accountable for their past.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 03:02 AM
2

Physical evidence can be used to corroborate a witness statement, neither would be enough on their own that is what is required in the court of law. Unfortunately media whores like sharpton trot their "victim" out when he knows the story is false.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 02:58 AM
1

So you would have no problem with a serial rapist that committed crimes under 18 having a clean record and teaching children.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 02:49 AM
1

Our justice system will always rely on witnesses, physical evidence will not be enough in many cases. If any fixing needs to be done it's dealing with the parasites like sharpton who encourage people to lie, he should be locked up for life.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 02:37 AM
1

So if a 17 year old commits murder are they freed on their 18th birthday in your world.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 02:29 AM
7

If a 15 year old can be tried as adult for murder because they know it's wrong, a 15 year old who was given many opportunities to admit she lied can be treated as an adult too.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 02:17 AM
3

The guy even said if she publicly admits that she lied he'd waive the judgment.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 02:14 AM
0

He is a leach on society and discredits any true allegations by getting multiple clients to perjure them selves.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 02:10 AM
1

If you are reporting a murder, you generally will be called as a witness. The prosecutor has to prove you lied, very hard when you did, see Barry Bonds, and nearly impossible when you didn't lie.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 04:59 PM
6

Now most downvotes will be from your edit.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 04:52 PM
1

Why not take that to its extreme? Why report murder charges, when you might be arrested for perjury? Why report fraud, or assault, or any crime? You do know that he was being sarcastic. Anyway perjury is knowingly lying under oath.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 04:48 PM
2

Logic doesn't work on people like her, it's actually better that these people don't understand logic as their lunacy will expose there movement for what it is.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 03:52 PM
2

It's 17 years and the judge would have to show he maintained the property during that whole time.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 03:45 PM
3

"Profanity is a weak mind trying to express itself forcibly."
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:00 PM
2

If you cared to RTFA you would have read the first lady also wants to canonize single mothers.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:32 PM
16

MTV's best kiss award 1996, Anthony Guidera, forces a kiss on species costar Natasha henstridge. I don't remember an up roar but that was a long time ago.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:15 PM
6

If all you're focused on is rape you are correct but things beside rape can happen to you in a dark alley.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 08:21 PM
11

I had friends go to Xavier university men defiantly went places in groups for protection. When one of my friends roommates walked by himself to the grocery in the middle of the day he was robbed and beat up. The police told him he need more street smarts and he should have walked with a group of people and should know better. As sad as this is when you're in the city especially certain parts you should be in groups male female it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 07:36 PM
2

The final civil rights act was the one that forced private companies not to discriminate and to prove they are not discriminating. This would violate that act.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 05:40 PM
-2

That might be the dumbest thing I read today, conservatives are for limited government and treating everyone equally not pushing alpha male stereotypes.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:43 PM
2

Pita is not exactly the bastion of sane thinking.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:52 AM
1

That is true only if the accuser does not take the stand and if their testimony is not used in court.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:08 AM
2

They got a conviction because the guy agreed to the plea. What happened was shitty and their lawyer should have done a better job. If the guy is truly innocent then the lawyer and the girl are the responsible parties.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:04 AM
22

Forging the title of a car with intent to steal it is also a crime. Granted it is less serious than assault, but it is something to keep in mind. Grand larceny/fogey is a felony, assault is a misdemeanor.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:29 AM
5

The equality part is where many minority advocacy groups make a mistake. They try to make the outcomes the same thinking that is equality but by doing that that create an inequality.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 11:14 PM
6

Dumb women will be influenced by it, cosmo is doing you a favor by making it easier to screen out the crazies.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:05 PM
23

Why get so worked up about a joke other then it not being humorous. Anybody offended by this is no different then a whiney feminist.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:24 AM
-2

The child would go to the father/father's parents unless they refused custody.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 11:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter