TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jimicus Archive

View 1 post and 50 comments by jimicus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Too damn right. "Toxic masculinity" and similar constructs reduce men to nothing. It becomes difficult to know precisely where to draw the line with natural male behaviour for fear of being "toxic". Oh, sure, there's plenty of obvious stuff. Don't go around raping people, for instance. But it isn't the obvious stuff that's the problem, it's when an imaginary line is drawn between "okay" and "not okay" and nobody knows where the damn line is because it's different for everyone. It's difficult not…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/24 09:11 PM
3

What's particularly interesting is that women will often talk to men they meet in a casual or even a romantic context in ways they'd never talk to their dad. Hell, like they'd never talk like that to the man pouring their drinks behind a bar.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/24 09:03 PM
7

And it appears everywhere in society - there is a subtle sussuration that says "Men are worthless. Men are disposable. Men's very existence is an affront". Obviously it's a lot more subtle than that, but it's there. Is it any wonder that young men being exposed to that all their lives flock to someone saying "You're not worthless. You're not disposable. You have value."?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/24 04:30 PM
2

The last couple of paragraphs in the article touch on precisely that point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/24 04:26 PM
11

So do I, but it'd probably have fucked me up for a good long time. Probably best that horny teenage boys don't make the rules.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/24 08:22 PM
5

Exactly. She's got her pass before she's even been sentenced.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/24 08:21 PM
1

That shouldn't be necessary; I'm sure the airline will sue for the costs they've incurred.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/22 06:07 PM
1

She'd been on that cock for a long time beforehand, I'm sure.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/22 06:00 PM
1

Note the organisation that pushed this narrative is "Women against rape". If you chase down the article itself and read it, you'll find quite a different story: They're saying that these women are being aggressively prosecuted under laws that could result in a harsh punishment (such as perverting the course of justice), and are advocating for them to be prosecuted for lesser offences (such as wasting police time).
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/22 03:40 PM
1

I think "cute" in this case means "naive". As in "Aww, isn't it cute, she still thinks she can swim through life with no consequences!"
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/21 12:30 PM
1

Quite a few jurisdictions explicitly write into law that rape is a man against a woman. So - legally speaking - it's impossible for a man to be raped.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/21 06:19 PM
2

It goes a step further: He said he preferred a “clean break”, but after advice from intellectual property specialists he believed the copyright alone could potentially be worth “in the millions”. ​ “I’m not after the money, all I want is a fair outcome.” ​ He believed Alalääkkölä was a wonderful artist, and they worked as a team in the family business until “it just fell apart”. ​ “The copyright was something that was created while we were together.” Call me intuitive, but I'm going to hazard a …
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/21 05:22 PM
-5

Okay, so what facts is it you're concerned about?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/21 05:15 PM
4

Exactly the same in the UK.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/15 09:45 PM
4

Yep. I think the thing Pao seems to forget is this: Internet users are a fickle bunch who have precisely zero loyalty to any given site and the cost of moving to a different social network is nil. The history of the internet is littered with the corpses of businesses that forgot this - whether they redesigned their site to help monetise it and in the process pissed off most of their users, or someone else simply came along and did basically the same thing, but better. MySpace, Bebo, Digg and Fri…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/15 07:52 PM
3

"Due to this court case, employers see me as not that likeable and a poor performer, as that is what the defence has painted me as." Well, let's look at this one in context: Your former employer fired you. You sued them. This is always going to be a risky gambit, because you're basically going into a very public place and saying "Hey everyone, look what happens to you if you hire me!". Not, therefore, something I imagine most people would feel comfortable with unless they know - and can prove - …
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/15 10:22 AM
3

Some bullshit company will offer her another job in an effort to appeal to the growing quagmire of smug assholes who've discovered that they can wield both ends of the doublesided dildo of victimhood and power. Very clever. Very clever indeed.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/15 10:17 AM
2

voat.co
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/15 10:13 AM
2

I've been thinking for some time that women are subtle creatures and don't respond well to dread applied with size 11 boots; you have to be subtle. It's interesting to see that someone else says basically the same thing. Athol Kay may be dismissing dread these days, but the whole MAP programme is based on subtle dread. Not "sort your act out or you're out", but "hey, look at me, I've been working out and I can replace you quite easily". If that isn't subtle dread, I don't know what is.
/r/MarriedRedPill25/05/15 08:35 PM
1

Thing is, it was all an innocent mistake and could have been resolved without any need to even pay interest. That is, until she spent the money. Then it became a criminal offence potentially punishable by prison time. She's been given until the New Year (so her deadline's just been and gone) to repay the money with interest. Her "punishment" is paying the interest.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/15 08:13 PM
2

You ever tried calling a council?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/15 11:47 AM
1

To be honest though, bank made a mistake. Bank has no case here. This has nothing to do with her being a woman. Not the bank, the payer made the mistake. I agree it has nothing to do with her being a woman; she made it so when she said she was being singled out for being attractive. Regarding not being responsible for others mistakes - the thing is, the law as written is intended to keep people honest. An honest, paranoid person would make a big fuss with the bank, document the fact they had don…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/15 11:27 AM
5

I think the sequence of events has been highly abridged. The more likely sequence is: Council fucks up. Council recognises the fuckup. Council asks for repayment. Protagonist says "It's your problem". Council involves the police. It goes to court. Court adds interest (perfectly legal). She now has to pay interest at a rate about ten times that of any savings account.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/14 11:38 PM
3

If I'm honest, it sounds like Bank of Mum & Dad have finally lost patience and said "Fine. You do something this stupid, you're on your own. Yeah, sure, we'll pay you as per usual for the work you do in the stables, but figuring how to use that to pay for your fuckup is your problem".
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/14 11:35 PM
8

Agreed. The ONLY way I can see that working any differently is if she engineered what she did to minimise the risk of being told anything different. So rather than, say, walking into the branch and saying "I think there's been a mistake", she calls the call centre (which she knows is full of 19 year olds who don't care if it's in the UK; 19 year olds who don't care and barely speak English if it's offshore) and words the question she asks very carefully: "Yes, I have a transaction coming in, can…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/14 11:32 PM
2

That's what you see. Now, the question is, if you contact the bank and make a big stink: "Look I'm really quite sure that's a mistake. Can you have someone look into it properly?" - can they see any more detail? I strongly doubt that they can't.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/14 11:26 PM
17

This bit here is where I'm not sure if it's a pussy pass - or a pussy pass denied. The way she's complaining, it's like she expected a pussy pass but it was denied. Thing is, you look at it objectively and she had £52K deposited in her bank which she knew full well was a fuckup. And she spent £9k of it on designer handbags which was her "boyfriend's idea" (so she's saying she shouldn't be expected to realise there might be consequences to spending money that isn't yours?) - and yet she's not bei…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/14 11:23 PM
17

The guidelines for taking that sort of money are 2-3 years in prison. Even if you just look at the £12,000 she spent (rather than the £40,000 she put to one side and paid back promptly on demand), that would still suggest up to 21 months in prison. Knock much of that sentence off because she wasn't abusing a position of trust to get hold of the money in the first place and this wasn't a case of intentional fraud that went on for years; I'm not sure if this belongs in here or in /r/pussypass.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/14 05:42 PM
8

The law doesn't give a damn what you think. She knew full well there was no way that money was hers, yet she treated it like it was.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/14 03:42 PM
4

Yep. On /r/theredpill sidebar, there's a "Shit tests 101" post. Read it, it's gold. But in short, there's about half a dozen ways to deal with a shit test like this: Agree and amplify. If you can't think on your feet fast, you'll screw this one up. Amplification has to be to a stupidly absurd degree; if you can't do this immediately she comes out with the shit test, don't do it at all. Change the subject. Not a bad option, but it's a bit obvious if you've been driving in silence up until she spe…
/r/MarriedRedPill18/12/14 07:15 PM
3

You don't have to reply to everything your wife says - in fact, it's often better you don't. These petty shit tests are obviously looking for a reaction - any reaction, positive or negative. Don't give them one.
/r/MarriedRedPill18/12/14 06:04 PM
2

Tell me more about this "saying no to sex" discussion - was that discussed in any of the books?
/r/MarriedRedPill16/12/14 08:33 PM
4

Nothing wrong with being angry - it's a perfectly natural response to being messed around. The trick is how you channel that anger. Left unchanneled, you're likely to wind up blowing up at an inappropriate moment in an inappropriate way. But that doesn't sound like what's happened here. Sounds like you channeled it pretty well - gave a firm "No, THIS is what's happening" then walked away.
/r/MarriedRedPill16/12/14 06:36 PM
2

This has been an absolute object lesson for me - I've done a terrible job of recognising and responding appropriately to shit tests, and this example is just perfect. Well done for staying strong.
/r/MarriedRedPill15/12/14 09:59 PM
3

Then she will spend every moment bashing the RP ideas and talking about how the red pill advocates for rape and the hatred of women and are a bunch of boys who don't know how to handle themselves with women. Not terribly surprising. You've got three things going on here: A bunch of angry feminists who were quite happy with the status quo and able to screech loud enough to deafen a banshee. I haven't googled but I don't imagine they have anything nice to say about red pill ideas! /r/theredpill is…
/r/MarriedRedPill10/12/14 07:27 PM
2

I'm also that age. I'm going to call your bullshit right now. You are the only judge of your actions. You are the only person in the world responsible for figuring out how YOU need to change. You only have power over one persons actions, and that is you! You have all the power to do this, and all the responsibility to do it. You're absolutely right. Not only that, "it's hard" is a defeatist attitude that is setting myself up for failure. So thank you for calling me out on that. I needed it.
/r/MarriedRedPill09/12/14 06:49 PM
3

Now how to square this with a small town with damn-all to do...
/r/MarriedRedPill08/12/14 07:07 PM
4

So while I'll go out of my way to make sure to not say or trigger anything that could be construed at butt-hurtedness, she'll get mad that I'm leaving and reframe whatever I'm doing as pouting. I have no idea but if you ever figure out a way to answer that one, please tell me. My wife does the exact same thing.
/r/MarriedRedPill08/12/14 07:01 PM
2

I'll continue to improve on this, I'm confident now that this just takes getting used to, and it gets easier and more automatic with time. Very likely. Sounds like you're rather farther down the road than I am. It sounds like you kicked ass with this! Wish I did. Truth be told, I'm still at a very early stage, and the learning process is progressing more slowly than I'd like. NMMG says this is typical of "nice guys", so perhaps I shouldn't be surprised! I've noticed that she never backs down or …
/r/MarriedRedPill08/12/14 06:49 PM
1

If it gets out of hand, I calmly take a breather and go for a walk, making sure she understands I'm not doing it for me to calm down, but for her to. This is definitely something I need to do. My wife invariably interprets me doing that as "storming off in a hissy fit" (it'd be more accurate to describe it as "getting out before she escalates into a full on screaming match, because she sure as hell never does anything to diffuse a situation").
/r/MarriedRedPill07/12/14 08:20 PM
2

The trick is you don't ask her to stop her behavior. Asking her to do this gives her power over you. Instead, when she is doing that kind of talking SHE wants you to engage with her. So you have power here by NOT doing what she wants, and not engaging her at all. Why? Not because you don't do this to her, not because it isn't fair, but because you don't want to engage this way. This makes it her problem. She wants you to engage, so now she has to figure out the way to do it. My God, that's it! Y…
/r/MarriedRedPill05/12/14 08:39 PM
1

Nobody reads beyond the first couple of lines anyway, so you might as well say what you like after that. Either that or /u/balmylips is going to be asking about divorce lawyers who are open for business on 26th December.
/r/MarriedRedPill29/11/14 01:44 PM
2

Tell me about it! I had severe oneitis as a teen, invariably for girls who weren't even remotely interested in me. The irony is that the resulting ignoring of virtually all the other girls had quite a number of them chomping at the bit for me. And I wasn't even aware of a single damn one of them. It's only in the last few years I've been able to think back and say "D'oh!".
/r/MarriedRedPill28/11/14 10:47 PM
7

My guess is our OP is at the very start of his journey. Assuming I'm right, he has a long, difficult road ahead. You're right that he should be confident enough in himself to do what he pleases but at the same time, now is a little early in the day to be doing things that will invite nuclear shit testing. There's going to be plenty of that over the coming months anyway, no need to add to it for no good reason!
/r/MarriedRedPill28/11/14 05:08 PM
6

The first thing it says in MMSL is "don't tell your wife what you're doing... at least, not at first".
/r/MarriedRedPill28/11/14 04:25 PM
11

Set up a separate amazon account in just your name - if she finds out and asks questions, tell her it's for christmas shopping and you'd like to make sure she gets at least one surprise for Christmas. Buy at least one item for her from Amazon through that account so you're not lying. A nice surprise, like an ironing board or a toaster. Maybe an exercise bike. What you don't tell her is you've also set up your own Kindle app against that account; download the app onto your smartphone, read it the…
/r/MarriedRedPill28/11/14 03:18 PM
1

If you've already read it, I can say this bit directly: RP methodology does not guarantee a nice easy life and a happy marriage. If it all works out, then yes that is what you'll get. But some marriages have spent so long with the man being a complete walkover that any attempt to change that is doomed to failure. A vital part of the process is understanding and accepting that you can't fix everything; sometimes all you can do is move on. Frankly, I think a lot of us come to this from a place of …
/r/MarriedRedPill25/11/14 09:23 AM
2

If you haven't already, read "No More Mr. Nice Guy" - I think it might help you. In fact, scratch that - I think it definitely will help you. It concentrates on the personality issues that most BP men suffer rather more than more superficial things like "lift weights" or "buy a new wardrobe". I can't summarise all the bits that I think are important - the whole book is gold and I couldn't do it justice in a couple of paragraphs.
/r/MarriedRedPill20/11/14 09:02 PM
3

In many countries, "no-fault" divorce means that when dividing assets, no account is taken for whose fault the divorce is. Assets are divided according to contribution within the marriage and need post-marriage, to hell with whose actions precipitated the divorce. Having said that, it's hard to imagine that a judge (who, lest we forget, is still human) would have much sympathy for a man who was out fucking any bit of skirt he could find.
/r/MarriedRedPill14/11/14 10:12 PM
1

Not true, "irretrievable breakdown" is grounds for divorce. The second aspect of 'no fault' divorce - where the court pays no heed as to whose fault the marriage collapsed when splitting the couples assets - we most certainly do have.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 11:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter