TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jimjoebob Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by jimjoebob on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

triggered! downvoted
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:53 PM
2

hmf. 4 months,huh? amateur..... make those years, and I'll start to pity you. :)
/r/seduction04/04/15 11:42 PM
1

--that's a fear that arises from someone with a crushingly low self esteem. the bitch is psychologically, emotionally, and most likely, physically abusive and the guy is concerned about what SHE will do if he runs away from that?? reverse the genders on that statement and see if it makes more sense. not trying to be combative at all, that's just so over the top nutso to me. you wait until she's in a "good place" emotionally, (read: in between bar exam dates) wait until she's gone for the day, th…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 02:00 AM
9

wow, what a freaking crazy woman! holy shit. she beat herself up, to the point of visible injury, then blamed her boyfriend. what a winner! I can't help but think about What the Holy Fuck that dude was thinking after the first 5 times she did this shit? then after the next 5 times. at this point, they both got some serious emotional problems. I can't find myself respecting that dude at all though. If that happens once, that's reason enough for me to dump the bitch. Twice--ONLY if she has some se…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 04:34 PM
2

my first response to that is, "No. do you get hard when your dad fucks you?" that usually shuts down the conversation pretty nicely.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:52 PM
2

both, would be my guess.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:31 PM
1

sorry, but this is the logic behind Islamic sensibilities regarding how women should dress. i.e., Muslim women are required to cover themselves because according to Sharia law, if a man looks at a woman's body and is sexually aroused, it's the woman's fault for being sexy to him. If she gets raped by said guy, it's the woman's fault cause "she tempted him."
/r/MensRights04/09/12 06:14 PM
3

so, they didn't want the competition maybe? "only WE can distribute CP! go get reddit!!"
/r/MensRights17/02/12 05:26 PM
1

With nothing else on TV, I still could not bare to sit through the 30 minute show sweetie? it's * BEAR in this context. when you show a little leg, what happens is some of your leg is bared. when something makes you cringe, it's hard to bear. I thought Forbes was supposed to have a good spelling/grammar checker. sorry, she's retarded IMO. if you have a national column in a 'big money' magazine, at least learn how to spell BEAR correctly and know when to use it. I wonder if she titters uncontroll…
/r/MensRights25/12/11 06:45 AM
2

man, just listen to the abomination she produces when she sings, it will make you forget about how pissed you are about this, b/c you'll be laughing your ass off. seriously, it's hilariously wretched the atrocity starts at 2:35, and gets really funny at about 9:00 when Zappa's singers start imitating Yoko's "singing".
/r/MensRights16/08/11 06:04 AM
1

upvoted for "shrieking harridan"! never heard that one before!
/r/MensRights16/06/11 04:15 PM
2

that guy's bishop could have opened up the Secret Archive files and proven his accusers wrong........but then the bishop would have had to admit that he had Secret Archive Files regarding abuse and rape What I hate most about a story like this, is that 1)destroys an innocent person, and 2) it takes credibility away from ACTUAL cases of rape and abuse by priests.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 03:59 PM
5

um, how do the Dutch fare? prostitution is legal there, and as far as I know (never having been there), I'm not aware of Holland being a men's nirvana or anything. (unless you're a pothead) I think if women were suddenly unable to "entice men into pregnancy and marriage with sex" in Holland, it would make the news. Sorry, man. I'm all about mensrights n such, but we'll ALWAYS be manipulated with sex to some extent, no matter how much or little political power women have. I have a dick, it's alwa…
/r/MensRights16/06/11 03:46 PM
1

I'm with some of these other posters--tell her first, that you're going to tell him. Give her a couple days (and tell her that), then tell him. If she's got the ovaries to tell him herself, then he won't be shocked/pissed that a relative stranger is butting into his personal life with a bombshell. If she's a coward, she won't tell him, and she'll get the shit from him that she deserves, and to hell with her. It could also be that everyone is aware of the others, and they are all swingers, in whi…
/r/MensRights04/05/11 05:27 AM
13

I love the irony in how a woman is telling everyone all about men's problems, as if she really has any idea about what it's like to be a man. I think I should write a book and call it "The FUCK is wrong with American Women?!?" --wonder how much positive attention it would receive! lol just kidding, I'd be lynched by code pink.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 03:54 PM
8

for me, the indifference is caused by american women's misandry. I used to try, but my last girlfriend fixed that for me
/r/MensRights01/03/11 03:52 PM
1

what are we arguing about again?
/r/MensRights23/02/11 05:47 PM
0

the fact that you keep replying belies your assertion that you don't center your life around replying to me. again, whatever you're saying I do, is really what you're doing. This really is a source of lulz for me. What would it take for you to consider yourself a "winner" in this?
/r/MensRights22/02/11 05:14 PM
0

LOL. took you a little while for that one!
/r/MensRights22/02/11 06:07 AM
0

thanks for the confirmation that I was right! guess you really can't argue your way out of a paper bag. LOL!
/r/MensRights20/02/11 09:25 PM
1

that's great! you still think I'm mad, even though you wrote the truth about it yourself: When I do it it's proof I'm mad, but when you do it, it's proof that you aren't! I'll just take as a given that whatever you're writing about me is, in fact, what you're doing. like when you wrote: You must have been pounding on your keyboard so hard when you wrote all that out, your little face red with anger, holding down that shift key, then declaring yourself not mad. I wish I had a picture of it. and M…
/r/MensRights19/02/11 10:23 PM
1

you're still waiting for me to play your arbitrary game? do you even remember what you originally commented on?? you're gonna get old waiting for me to play by your little internet rules. fuckin LOL
/r/MensRights19/02/11 02:59 PM
0

LOL
/r/MensRights19/02/11 08:15 AM
0

When I do it it's proof I'm mad, but when you do it, it's proof that you aren't! LOL X 2
/r/MensRights19/02/11 07:52 AM
0

When I do it it's proof I'm mad, but when you do it, it's proof that you aren't! LOL
/r/MensRights19/02/11 01:44 AM
0

all these invitations! you're so giving, like a girl. you just NEED to be right, huh? that's maturity right there. LOL time to take your blood pressure meds!
/r/MensRights18/02/11 05:17 PM
0

When I do it it's proof I'm mad, but when you do it, it's proof that you aren't! exactly my point! I'm not mad, but enjoying driving up your blood pressure. and it's not that I can't read what you write, I just can't be bothered to give a shit about what you write. small distinction, but there it is, LOL. I can't be right, I don't care! it's fun making you spin your wheels. just curious- do you consider yourself to lean towards "liberal" or "conservative"?
/r/MensRights17/02/11 09:24 PM
0

Where do you even get the idea I'm mad? b/c you keep responding with novels. this is fun! who has the most points now? wait, that's a dumb question, YOU DO, of course. you're such a winner, you big internet tough guy! It is a little sad that you need to be "right" so badly, on the internet. keep on spinning, buddy!
/r/MensRights16/02/11 04:30 PM
0

LOL! keep grinding! it's even funnier that you're "getting" me! sorry I failed your arbitrary tests. I didn't even read it, there's too. much. butthurt. and know what? I'll still sleep, and you'll still be pissed. happy blood pressure!
/r/MensRights16/02/11 08:51 AM
2

coverage of Parah Salin needs to be reined in. [FTFY]
/r/MensRights15/02/11 08:59 PM
0

Wrong again, you used butthurt on your own, technically, the first time I said "butthurt" was my own initiative, since it seemed to be illustrative of your tone. Then, you asked me to say it a lot more, so I did, which seemed to piss you off, so I indulged you a lot more. No matter how hard you try to dress yourself up as an adult, you just can't hide your inner 4chan infant for long. How about this: For the next three posts, try not to say something that would get a ten year old kicked out of c…
/r/MensRights15/02/11 02:34 PM
0

I was just saying "Butthurt" b/c you asked me to! I was just trying to make you happy........ Oh, and use the term "butt-hurt" more. It's even more hilarious how you assume I'm raging over this. I really am getting a kick out of making you spin your wheels. You never did tell me what Merck's net profits were from 2000-2007, you just took off on more "gotcha's" fyi--it doesn't take much effort to type a lot of letters in a row. that's not rage, it's "doing as you asked me to". Even more hilarious…
/r/MensRights14/02/11 05:27 PM
0

good for you! you got me, dang I'm WRONG! OH NOES! an anonymous butthurt douche on the internet hath deemed me WRONG!!!! Woe is me! lackaday! alas, alack. for I hath lost the contest of "who can most maturely call the other an ass". thou hast bested me good Sir Douche. you haz internet points now. yey!!!!!
/r/MensRights13/02/11 10:31 PM
0

That's pretty funny. Grow up. says the guy who is arguing on the internet as if it makes a real difference in the real world. Get over the smell of your own farts.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 02:57 PM
0

well, I would call the fact that the board of executives and CEO's of those companies merely having to pay a fraction of their net profits, instead of prison time--"avoiding accountability" I guess that's just my opinion--I think if a company's negligence costs someone their life, the punishment should include jailtime for the upper management. so, what was Merck's net profit from 2000 - 2007? It's almost like you desperately need to avoid directly answering any questions. The depth to which you…
/r/MensRights12/02/11 05:37 AM
0

and what was Merck's net profit from 2000 to 2007? LOL
/r/MensRights12/02/11 01:02 AM
0

company reports profits in the tens of billions, has to pay a couple million for wrongful deaths. LOL, yes of course that's accountability. they learned their lesson well! LOL that is why I never shave (anywhere) and refuse to shower. I hate messing with my body's most basic functions for my and my partner's convenience. INSTANTLY run screaming insults about me and labeled me a troll and a shill for the pharmecutical industry, in both of your replies, b/c of your other post, and the snarky, cond…
/r/MensRights11/02/11 11:51 PM
0

BUTTHURTBUTTHURTBUTTHURT. vioxx really will kill you. it was taken off the market b/c a lot of people died after taking it. There was a huge lawsuit and large fines paid by the drugmaker. I really would not advise that you take it, based on what the lawsuit successfully alleged. BUTTHURTBUTTHURT hyperbole is taking something out of context and blowing out of proportion to avoid addressing the question/topic. You very nicely displayed just that for the majority of your message. THanks, I will con…
/r/MensRights11/02/11 05:39 PM
0

Wow, you are REALLY nuts. That's the exact same sort of reasoning the people who think vaccines cause autism use. hyperbole, false comparison How many deaths do they have on THEIR hands because of their stupidity and paranoia about the medical establishment? ad hominem attack, based on the previous hyperbole Ever heard of the FDA? There is no medicine on the market that hasn't undergone testing. Ever heard of a lobbyist? Ever heard about how corporate lobbies with enough money actually write the…
/r/MensRights10/02/11 08:09 PM
0

the above posters were saying it was 2 or more months of constant bleeding. I agree with your last sentence, and that's what I'm referring to! It's the barely-tested drugs that technically perform their advertised function, but always come with a laundry list of messed up side effects that range from nausea all the way up to death. THAT is what I think of when I think of "trolling Mother Nature". These fucking pharma companies just develop drugs, test them for a couple months, then release them.…
/r/MensRights09/02/11 06:50 PM
0

.....except for the fact that the people who "DO have brains" are the people who just up and release a new drug without extensive testing, b/c their corporate bosses are anxious to dig another billion dollars out of the general public. Yes, I'm sure all the women who have DIED as a result of taking these "improvements" would agree with you, if they could. Ya know, the women who took Nuvaring, Yaz, (and in 6 - 12 months, BeYaz)? They all trusted the "people who DO have brains" and paid for it wit…
/r/MensRights09/02/11 06:45 PM
1

that's true, but I'm not talking about natural means of arresting menstruation. (although your point is valid!) I don't know of any natural cause of menstrual cessation for 12 months straight, followed by (according to other comments here) 2 months of bleeding. is there?
/r/MensRights08/02/11 05:50 PM
2

male here. while I don't and can't have an opinion on the efficacy of this bc, I'm curious as to what the general consensus is of the women here regarding the commercials advertising this stuff. I'm not sure which bc it's for, but the sense I get from the ad is: "Hey ladies! What the hell does 10,000 years of evolutionary biology know about YOUR BODY??? It's YOURS, and if you don't want a period for a year or 2, you shouldn't have to have one! It's SCIENCE!! Trolling Mother Nature can't POSSIBLY…
/r/MensRights08/02/11 05:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter