TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jimmy17 Archive

View 1 post and 66 comments by jimmy17 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They made the change in 2010 but the announcement that the change was coming was made in the mid-nineties. It was planned during the Thatcher government and announced during the Major government.
/r/PussyPass04/10/19 12:41 PM
1

Not really. These changes were announced in the 90's. They were given quarter of a century to prepare. And the group that bought it to caught are called "Back to 60" and have one of their stated goals as returning Women's pension age back to 60.
/r/PussyPass04/10/19 12:40 PM
3

The changes were decided upon and announced in the mid-nineties. They had 25 years to prepare, it wasn't exactly sprung on them after they retired.
/r/PussyPass04/10/19 12:37 PM
3

It's always funny to come to bottom and see all the bitter white knights. U mad?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/15 03:07 PM
14

"You'll never find a good woman!" Well fortunately I found one who considers herself to be my equal. What I think she means is "you'll never find a woman with entitlement issues". God forbid.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/15 11:41 AM
2

No problem!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/15 06:53 PM
9

The part where she said "I'm just a woman, leave me alone"
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/15 06:41 PM
11

huh, I didn't notice. It seemed to be getting un-ironic up votes.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 01:14 AM
21

A comment I actually saw on twoxc: Totally sexist of course: men will still be able to pierce their genitals without the threat of legal action.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 12:52 AM
-1

So how much did he owe based on what he was earning back then? That should be the amount he owes. I agree that he probably owes her something and the court was right to allow her to take it to the CPS or whatever it was but 1.8 Million is silly (and you're right, probably set by here lawyers who will obviously go in high). Some calculation based on what he could have payed her back then had it been settled properly in the first case is due. You are right about the kid. I miscalculated. He was 12…
/r/PussyPass12/03/15 02:34 AM
3

Was the clown makeup also part of the dare?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 05:39 PM
2

Love the woman in blue at 1.37 Zoidburging out of there.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/15 05:36 PM
15

Untrue. His kid was 15 when he established the company. By the time his kid turned 22 the company was making an annual profit of £500,000. And that's the whole company, not his share. He was never a millionaire when they were children.
/r/PussyPass11/03/15 04:23 PM
14

Why? He didn't pay for his kid whilst he was a millionaire. Where did you get that idea. His kid was 15 when he established the company. By the time his kid turned 22 the company was making an annual profit of £500,000. How does that make him a millionaire at any point during his kids childhood?
/r/PussyPass11/03/15 04:13 PM
33

Yeah, but he wouldn't have been able to set up the company at that time and make the aforementioned shittonne of money if he was full time looking after his son for another 3 years. How do we know that? Plenty of single parents make a shittonne of money. JK Rowling became a billionairre from something she started whilst she was a single mother. Also she is asking for 1.9 million from a man who is worth about 100M. Thats almost 2%. She was looking after the kids for the first 3 years of a company…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:24 PM
28

He established the company when his child was 15. It wasn't a success for quite some years after that. He certainly didn't make any real money whilst they were children.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 11:58 AM
40

She raised his son whilst they were both poor. He should pay what he was due do pay then. Any money after the children became adults has nothing to do with her.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 11:49 AM
1

As per the second definition in the OED: Used for emphasis while not being literally true: I have received literally thousands of letters Seems like he used it correctly to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/15 10:21 PM
22

Just for some local colour. Fanny means vagina in the UK. Puts a whole new spin on this.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/15 03:02 AM
11

This girl got fucking raped No. She didn't. couldn't charge the guy because he's rich They did investigate but didn't charge due to lack of evidence. It's right there in the article. he then used his resources and position to have her prosecuted and she kills herself. He got the ball rolling but the CPS took up the case. They obviously thought it had enough evidence to pursue. Again, it's right there in the article. The only fuckkng solace I have is knowing that not a single subscriber to this f…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/15 01:15 PM
3

Aww, I was having fun!
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/15 10:03 PM
9

Look mate, you seem rather upset at all this so I'm gonna leave it there.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/15 06:46 PM
35

Said the sexist with no respect for women. Go take your gender version of the "white man's burden" elsewhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/15 06:26 PM
56

Get your sexist bullshit off here. Women are jut as capable of making rational decisions and being held accountable for them as the rest of us. Your attitude infantilises women and treats them as children that need to be wrapped in cotton wool. The epitome of the "Nice Guy" attitude.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/15 06:22 PM
-2

That's a subset of rape. It's like saying, not car, Ford.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/15 12:22 AM
1

Ahh, fair enough. That makes sense.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/15 06:05 PM
2

I imagine because that was huge, was on the front cover of the paper and caused a storm before it was found out to be fake. Far more important than some random assault that barely made into the red tops. Another important thing to point out is that that the Army story directly accused the army of wrongdoing. They were eager to defend themselves and people were also pissed off that the paper had slandered the Army. This story, if it's made up, is accusing an imaginary person therefore there is no…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/15 01:29 PM
5

TLDR: Only rag tabloids with questionable reliability reported this and if you do a search of court cases (all of which are publicly available in the UK) this case doesn't exist.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/15 01:04 PM
6

The Mirror is a mainstream news outlet in the UK, one hopes they checked their facts. Christ no. They are an absolute rag and are criticised for a lack of fact checking on a regular basis and have even been done for outright fabricating stories a number of times. That's why Piers Morgan got fired as editor several years back, he was in charge when they entirely fabricated a story about the British Army and published photos of soldiers pissing on detainees. It later came out that the soldiers wer…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/15 12:57 PM
0

Precisely. And a 14 year old cannot legally consent so this is a rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/15 08:20 PM
3

Mate, it clearly is. Stop embarrassing yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/14 07:12 PM
5

Good jaaab good jaaab!
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/14 02:23 PM
2

I had a feeling this was the answer.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/14 10:20 PM
1

Low quality bait.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/14 07:04 PM
1

People don't seem to understand you can't just refuse service to women in the US. It's called the Civil Rights Act, and it's one of the first lines of Title VII. I hear you have Women only gyms in the States. How do they work?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/14 07:02 PM
41

3/10. Low quality bait.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/14 12:27 PM
5

true, I felt that you were saying that it was bad because she was a woman. I agree that his actions were overtop irrespective of the gender of the other person.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 05:41 PM
32

That's not what equal treatment means. Equal treatment means that she gets treated as any man would in the same situation. Perhaps he did go to far, but it wasn't especially bad because she's a woman. It's just bad.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 02:54 PM
20

It's kind of obvious. Women should be treated the same. In the GIF she was.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 01:51 PM
0

Ahh. Understood.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/14 01:55 AM
4

By law they can't restrain a shoplifter I think in the UK if any member of the public sees someone committing a crime they are allowed to restrain them until police arrive. Does this not apply in the US?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/14 01:07 AM
2

Exactly. In no way am I condoning what he did but the law should be applied equally to all.
/r/PussyPass15/11/14 03:16 PM
0

No.
/r/PussyPass14/11/14 04:52 PM
2

Well this sub would be a bit boring if it was just one post containing the dry stats on the matter. But yeah, your are right. On average the poor are treated more harshly than the rich by the law, black people are treated more harshly than white people and men are treated more harshly than women. This sub is about the last one. Interestingly most studies show that the male female justice imbalance is the most lopsided one. It finds large gender gaps favoring women throughout the sentence length …
/r/PussyPass14/11/14 12:00 PM
1

Blimey. Aren't you a delicate flower. I'm sure you'll survive.
/r/PussyPass14/11/14 11:50 AM
16

master trole 2014!
/r/PussyPass13/11/14 06:17 PM
9

Perhaps she's used to it.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/14 05:15 PM
64

That is the pimpest pimp slap ever. "You don't ever touch me ho, I ain't playing wichoo". Brilliant.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/14 04:46 PM
2

It does exist. Obviously not so much on 2XC as on feminist subreddits but I have seen it. And not always at derailing the discussion. It isn't that problems don't exist because patriarchy, but rather, patriarchy causes problems for both men and women. I have heard everything from problems not existing to problems not being significant to problems being your own fault. I have only very very rarely seen men issues discussed in feminist spaces and I have very often seen the mens rights movement in …
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:45 PM
3

Ok, that's a fair point. I did pick an extreme. But if you go on any of the more mainstream feminist subreddits or even just 2XC there is a huge quantity of MR bashing as well. So my original point stands. And saying that, to an outsider the feminist subreddits always seem extremely hostile to dissenting opinions. (and don't even get me started on the fact that MR is dismissed because apparently feminism should be all that men need as it is an equal rights movement, but if you try to raise mens …
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:17 PM
3

Only in as much as the reverse is true. Have you ever been on SRSfeminsm?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:31 PM
0

Feminists are all about gaining equal rights (which I'm all for) but not equal responsibilities. It just so happens that the second point lines up quite well with 60 year old men who feel women are weak and need to be protected. They may not be feminists by they are white knights.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:10 AM
3

If the children are the most important thing here, so important that it overrides the rights of a single man with no biological relation to the children why not pick someone else? Why not Bill Gates? He'd be able provide a much better upbringing. Doesn't matter that he's not the dad, it's the children that are the most important thing here.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:07 AM
1

As she should. We are either for or against bullying. Can't have it both ways.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:51 AM
1

Not only that. But all the women are portrayed as victims and men as perpetrators to the point that the phrasing on the gay one implies the both may have been perpetrators. Man on poster 1: I stopped Man on poster 2: I backed off Men on poster 3: We didn't
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:37 AM
1

They also basically picked one of the lowest reporting rates for rape they could find (more reliable studies set it at around 55%) and the lowest number for false reports (the range given in the study they used was 2-8% so naturally they used 2% as their figure, other studies put it higher.) There were many other problems. The funniest, and the most telling of the authors intention to mislead the reader, is the fact that the figures on the right hand side are actually smaller than those on the l…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:59 PM
2

I think the thing is the title of this thread is poorly phrased. I am not proud to be a man, I am proud of accomplishment I have done AS a man which wouldn't necessarily be accomplishments in other groups. If you'll excuse me, Im going to copy the response I made in another comment as i feel it sums up what I believe quite well: What i'm saying is that yes these are personal achievements that people should be proud of and not simply proud to be in a group, but the context in which the achievemen…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:37 AM
1

What i'm saying is that yes these are personal achievements that people should be proud of and not simply proud to be in a group, but the context in which the achievement was made cannot be overlooked. If a guy came up to you and said that he had just told all his friends he was straight and dating a girl you wouldn't see that as anything to be proud of. A man coming up and saying that he has recently told all his friends he is gay and dating a man is brave due to the social context. A woman say…
/r/MensRights28/03/12 10:59 PM
0

I agree with you on all those points but for the implication that one cannot be proud of their accomplishments as a man just as these other group can be. (although I could be making a false inference here) I am proud of some stuff that I have done as a man. I am not proud because I am a man of feel superior because I am. Would you say that was acceptable?
/r/MensRights28/03/12 09:56 PM
8

Tell you what reduces the risk of breast cancer nearly 100% - Double mastectomy.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:05 PM
1

So do you believe the threads in 2XC where women say they are proud of certain things about themselves sexist. Is a gay pride rally actually just gay bashing. You know one can be proud with out feeling superior.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:01 PM
1

I think you need to read the Wiki page on the "Straw Men" arguments.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:00 PM
1

The control is hardly complete if one cannot switch it back on reliably.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 05:48 PM
1

This really only shows half the story. Firstly morality is not the only factor to take into account its also age at which you get the cancer and how long you can live with it. Prostatae cancer will get you late and you tend to be able to live with for quite a while whereas breast cancer strikes earlier and kills quicker. To take this wolfram alpha metric 6.17 million life years are lost per year due to breast cancer and only 1.63 million to prostate. So just short of 4 times as much life lost du…
/r/MensRights17/10/11 05:44 PM
1

Except you're ignoring the fact that there was clearly a guy laughing as well, he did this to himself, no one would go to prison and girls do it too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgaIAI-kYyA
/r/MensRights07/07/10 01:26 PM
5

You're saying he was forced to make the tape because he knew he was going to be falsely accused of rape? Erm, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that wasn't his motive.
/r/MensRights07/07/10 07:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter