jjsparx Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	You get what you f*ckin' deserve! It wasn't a long-term solution, it was a short-term solution to protect both her and me from physical injury. The police were involved and took her side, despite overwhelming physical and photographic evidence to the contrary. I was arrested, I was treated as the abuser, she did get away with it. Sorry if my experience doesn't conform to your idealistic view of life. I can only guess you've never been in this situation, because you sound incredibly naive to think otherwise.	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/06/20 09:15 AM
3	You get what you f*ckin' deserve! Also, let me tell you - I've been punched, kicked, spat on, strangled, scratched, kneed, elbowed by my ex partner and never once did I resort to this kind of abuse in response. I restrained her without any physical harm to her or me - it can be done, it doesn't have to be a violent response. Had I attacked her or defended myself in the way this fucking idiot did, I can assure you I would have been down the police station in cuffs.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/06/20 07:19 PM
2	You get what you f*ckin' deserve! You're blaming the guy for defending himself when he was clearly trying to get away from her. Yes, I often try to get away from someone by putting them in a choke hold and body slamming them onto concrete. It was totally over the top and unnecessary - that isn't "defending yourself" or "getting away" - he could have killed her (or anyone else for that matter).	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/06/20 07:16 PM
0	You get what you f*ckin' deserve! True. She will probably think twice before doing this again, but it was a risky move to make her learn a lesson.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/06/20 06:16 PM
5	You get what you f*ckin' deserve! Some women will do this though. It's not about showing her who's boss or who's stronger, or equality or whatever else. It's about protecting yourself and ensuring you don't seriously hurt someone in the process - if only for your own sake. You're fucked if this happens and it's not on camera - even then someone could argue excessive force was used. Just saying.	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/06/20 05:51 PM
-13	You get what you f*ckin' deserve! I mean, he could have actually killed her doing that. I don't condone that sort of violence against anyone. Defensive moves only - I learnt that from being in an abusive relationship with a woman - could I have knocked her out in any one of our physical fights? Sure, but there are consequences to those actions. This guy was extreme, in my opinion. Risk your whole life to subdue a female with excessive force? No thanks. Men are so much stronger than women, that's a biological fact - equality or n…	/r/PussyPassDenied	03/06/20 05:26 PM
1	Is this true?? Amber Heard genuinely brought absolutely nothing to the part anyway. You could replace her with a mop and it would be the same movie, if a little better.	/r/PussyPassDenied	30/05/20 10:08 PM
35	Amber Heard trying to grasp at straws As a survivor of female on male domestic abuse and how I witnessed first-hand the complete and utter lack of acknowledgement from the police (who treated her as the victim) or subsequent lack of any justice I received for what I went through, this makes me hope that she gets what she deserves. I do, however, have a terrible feeling that she's going to walk away from this relatively unscathed and still have a career in Hollywood. We shall see.	/r/PussyPassDenied	28/05/20 11:19 AM
1	"what my actions have consequences?" "Is there something else that I can do?" No, not unless you've got a time machine and can go back and walk past that guy without stealing his sign. Being naughty has consequences, or were you not taught this as a child?	/r/PussyPassDenied	27/05/20 04:55 PM
2	Thought this belonged here Almost like there's a massive inequality there on how we treat each gender - if only there was a movement against that type of thing!	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 08:08 AM
2	Thought this belonged here I hear ya.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 07:35 AM
1	Thought this belonged here Yes, people can be cruel and the best policy is to ignore and not add fuel to the fire. You give them a reaction, they'll react right back at you.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 07:25 AM
3	Thought this belonged here Oh yeah, it's never their fault. Shitty behaviour is always someone else's fault, even if they're the ones doing it.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 07:24 AM
2	Thought this belonged here As anecdotal as it is, I'll take it. I'm not saying there aren't people doing it, I'm just not sure this is a widespread thing.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 07:23 AM
1	Thought this belonged here Well, I do draw the line somewhere, but yes, as a general rule, men like tits - a lot. I'm sure there are some tit-hating men out there somewhere, but I can't see them being in big numbers.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 07:16 AM
2	Thought this belonged here Ah, interesting, I do go on there a lot, but they are very much against personal attacks and shaming people. It's mainly people attempting to understand their mindset and being sympathetic, but sometimes there are some nasty comments on there, but not specifically about tits.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 07:15 AM
1	Thought this belonged here Surely not?	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 07:14 AM
0	Thought this belonged here Neither did I, and it's disingenuous of you to infer that from my original comment. To clear things up for you, my point is this: I walk down the road and someone shouts to me - "Oi, you've got small ears" - then I go on Twitter and post "Wow, OK. Just to put this out there. This ear shaming has got to stop. It's not OK, I have no control over my ears and it's not OK to shame me for it." Does that make it seem like an isolated incident or something that happens regularly enough to bring it to pe…	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 07:13 AM
0	Thought this belonged here Ok, so one person, where's this mob of people, enough to warrant a tweet specifically talking about tit shaming.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 05:50 AM
2	Thought this belonged here Yes, there seem to be fans of every type of breast, no matter what size or shape (personally, I like A cups up to C at a push, anything larger than that isn't my thing). I honestly don't recall ever seeing that many tit shaming examples, like I said, maybe one or two small tits, or flat chested comments, but they can be equally from men and women. However I have seen a shit ton of comments from women on height (there was some Taylor Lautner post on Facebook I seem to remember in particular, and …	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 05:48 AM
8	Thought this belonged here Almost like they're their own worst enemy sometimes.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 05:23 AM
16	Thought this belonged here Yes, I concur. They can get very catty if threatened by another female or feel less attractive than the target. That's not to say men don't do the whole macho bullshit as well, but women are better at the undermining, mind game, body shaming aspect.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 05:21 AM
20	Thought this belonged here I've no doubt there might be a few stupid comments about small tits (maybe), but I'm willing to bet my own dick that there's nowhere near the amount of height and dick shaming going on from women.	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 05:19 AM
174	Thought this belonged here Where is this tit shaming community? Anyone?	/r/PussyPassDenied	20/05/20 04:52 AM
9	For Pussy pass you don't have to literally have one do you? "her scrotum" - those words don't go together.	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/05/20 09:53 AM
1	This was in Bloomberg this week. I thought same of you might find it interesting If a person looks masculine, talks masculine, does traditionally masculine things but doesn't have a penis, is it a man? If a person looks feminine, talks feminine, does traditionally feminine things but doesn't have a vagina, is it a woman? Those are two very interesting questions you pose. I suppose my answer would be, in 99.9% of cases they would be a man, in 0.01% of cases they would be a trans-man (or trans-woman).	/r/seduction	16/02/20 09:03 PM
1	This was in Bloomberg this week. I thought same of you might find it interesting Thank you for the detailed response. It is greatly appreciated. If I may, I'd like to add some counter points to your comments: For much of human history and still in many places, you would be ostracized, beaten, or killed for not conforming to a cultural standard of what's "male" or "female". If you have a dick between your legs, you HAVE to like women, wear "men's clothes" etc. If you have a vagina, you HAVE to like men, cover your hair, raise children, aren't allowed to vote etc. I agree that…	/r/seduction	16/02/20 12:25 PM
5	This was in Bloomberg this week. I thought same of you might find it interesting Great explanation and succinctly put. I agree with the examples you've given on traditional gender roles (women=stay at home mother, man=bread winner). These can be added to the list of clothing, hair length, colour preference, job type etc. I think my main issue is that saying "gender is a social construct" without also considering gender is very heavily affected by sex hormones, this is where I have an issue. It's disingenuous to say, without considering any other factors, that gender is entir…	/r/seduction	16/02/20 11:45 AM
2	This was in Bloomberg this week. I thought same of you might find it interesting OK cool. Thanks for the discussion. I am learning from discussions like this. I appreciate your time.	/r/seduction	16/02/20 03:27 AM
1	This was in Bloomberg this week. I thought same of you might find it interesting OK, I think I understand what you're saying and it does make sense. There's a little bit of semantics at play here, but I am happy to be corrected on which terms to use in the right context. the concept of a man is entirely fabricated That's disingenuous though, saying that the concept of man is entirely fabricated, when man is quite clearly a product of male biology with some mild reinforcement from a historical perspective. The only social constructs I see at play are that men wear these types…	/r/seduction	16/02/20 03:13 AM
2	This was in Bloomberg this week. I thought same of you might find it interesting Thanks for the further info, I will take a look. From your own comment though, it looks like you're saying women and men are inherently different, so surely gender being a social construct isn't entirely accurate. hormone levels have an influence on certain things, like competitiveness, emotional sensitivity and aggression If women and men behave differently due to hormones, how is male and female a social construct. Or am I confusing sex with gender (I'm not sure that I am)?	/r/seduction	16/02/20 02:10 AM
0	This was in Bloomberg this week. I thought same of you might find it interesting How so? Genuinely interested how that works. See my reply to the original comment you replied to.	/r/seduction	16/02/20 01:47 AM
28	This was in Bloomberg this week. I thought same of you might find it interesting So, are you saying that in a theoretical vacuum (without society's influence), there would be no conceivable difference (other than visual) between a man and a woman. They would both gravitate towards the same interests, have similar skills etc. and that hormones and genetic makeup have absolutely no effect on the human brain and behaviour and any difference between how men behave and how women behave is all learnt from societal norms? Genuinely trying to get my head around this "gender is a soc…	/r/seduction	16/02/20 01:43 AM
-2	3 principles/"rules" for conversating My number 1 rule is to not use the made-up word "coversating" like a fucking imbecile. Rappers might be able to get away with it, but they're the exception.	/r/seduction	06/01/20 06:27 AM
1	How to not get flaked on at the one yard line Probably because you respond with "ayt" a lot.	/r/seduction	06/01/20 06:08 AM
1	What happened to the PUA Forums and RSD Inner Circles? I agree, but it has been subverted by some of the vocal minority on social media. There are also cases of consent being retroactively withdrawn, after the event. Buyer's remorse sets in and it's easier to feel supported and accepted by the #metoo movement than it is to accept responsibility for a mistake that you willingly made and now regret.	/r/seduction	19/12/19 08:10 PM
2	What happened to the PUA Forums and RSD Inner Circles? Umm, have you seen Twitter lately? There are plenty of groups on there demonising men and how they approach women in a predatory manner. They are in the minority, but they are very vocal and get a lot of media attention. If you're trying to say that these people don't exist, who view the PUA community as misogynist predators, you're a bit sheltered.	/r/seduction	19/12/19 08:05 PM
2	What happened to the PUA Forums and RSD Inner Circles? That's good to hear. I guess the media plays it up to epic proportions. I'd like to think that most women aren't that offended by a polite approach.	/r/seduction	19/12/19 02:53 AM
2	What happened to the PUA Forums and RSD Inner Circles? I think this has a lot to do with the post #metoo era, where even approaching a woman and talking to her is considered (sexual) harassment. PUA has never really had a good name, now it's synonymous with toxic masculinity and rape culture. I don't agree with the above obviously, but this is the world we live in now. Edit: I am not saying the original #metoo movement was a bad thing, it was originally a very noble cause to reveal sexual harassment by people in power (both men and women), but it wa…	/r/seduction	19/12/19 01:53 AM
2	Getting the second date? Your interpretation of the texts Not sure telling someone they're "very sweet" is going to set their world on fire. Also, texting the next morning and asking if they got home OK, is predictable. As for her "it was cool", she's definitely referring to the date, I mean it's positive, but fairly non-committal. Personally I wouldn't have ended this on "have a good weekend", I'd have said something about "let's do this again sometime". Then leave it a couple of days and hit her up for the next date. If you want to go on another date…	/r/seduction	08/12/19 02:53 AM