TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jmkiii Archive

View 2 posts and 323 comments by jmkiii on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-6

how?
/r/MensRights25/11/19 05:29 PM
-15

I didn't say otherwise.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 05:24 PM
-20

Where would you draw the line?
/r/MensRights25/11/19 05:09 PM
1

Boobs are not genitals. This is a stupid comparison.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 04:48 PM
13

where?
/r/MensRights21/11/19 07:05 PM
1

Vagina's pretty elastic, and some women have exceptionally small hands.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 09:59 PM
1

not properly aroused
/r/MensRights13/11/19 09:56 PM
6

over the cuckoo's nest
/r/MensRights13/11/19 09:53 PM
1

I didn't see anything in this ad feminizing men. Not conforming isn't a feminine quality. A backwards stoic ideal has been pushed on many of us our entire lives. Freedom from traditional outdated constraints should not be reserved only to women. Y'alls internalized misandry is showing. The lack of emotional outlet is likely a large contributor to men dying younger than women. The ad demonstrates attitudes useful in addressing the death gap. Edit: What the hell has happened to this sub? I'm dumbf…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 07:00 PM
2

Were they fighting for plants rights? ...maybe fungi?
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:32 PM
1

The hoverpissing on the left is the real problem. If you want to hit a target, you need to face it or have no room for error.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:30 PM
2

What about sewing the penis to a leg? Where is that from? Clitoridectomy or clitorectomy is the surgical removal or partial removal of the clitoris. The clitoris is only analogous to the glans, but you say "It’s basically like cutting off the head of the penis (or even the whole thing)." The thing that likely got you the downvotes, "Female genital mutilation isn on another level compared to circumcision," really goes to the heart of why MRAs exist. We are talking about mutilation of babie's and …
/r/MensRights01/11/19 03:38 PM
2

They said several things. Some are true and some are not. For instance: > typically happens when their 10 From wikipedia: ​ > In half the countries for which national figures are available, most girls are cut before the age of five.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 07:02 PM
4

OP is not actually god
/r/MensRights31/10/19 06:19 PM
3

You have a substantial amount of bad info here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation
/r/MensRights31/10/19 06:17 PM
1

My understanding is that in the states, an arrest record is kept unless you get it expunged in court. Either way, you can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:40 PM
1

With an arrest record and possibly several days in jail... No thanks.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 04:35 AM
0

Is that story over? You sure?
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:10 PM
-3

They are completely separate, privately owned organizations.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 10:34 PM
4

You gonna get banned
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy23/10/19 07:50 PM
1

Male professors must now get consent to explain things!
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:05 AM
0

None of that around here... /s
/r/MensRights04/10/19 06:07 PM
3

That's unfortunate. You seem like a good person.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 04:39 PM
14

Ever feel like you're trying to hold back an avalanche?
/r/MensRights04/10/19 04:06 PM
22

Then find a feminist calling her out. We are not feminists. It is not our job to police their ranks.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 03:41 PM
1

I have several times heard lesbians preferences on circumcision... WTF!
/r/MensRights04/10/19 03:39 PM
7

Every feminist buzzword that paints masculinity as a negative and femininity as a positive should have an analogue from men's point of view. We just have not traditionally needed to flesh these out to the degree absurdity of current feminism.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 09:45 PM
40

'Toxic Masculinity' If you look at this as "Internalized misandry" it makes much more sense. "Toxic masculinity" makes a man's socialization something he has done to himself. If feminists can explain away women's shortcomings (internalized misogyny) by making it an exclusively external problem, we can too.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 05:10 PM
1

I don't think you are a good sample of "people using/seeing the format"
/r/MensRights26/08/19 05:16 PM
1

I appreciate the example. Your knee-jerk reaction of "man good, woman bad" isn't doing you any good. Feel free to take a look at my history, I'm not one of those.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 06:36 PM
2

In that case, I'd expect you just to say "no." (here comes the airplane) Assertions are worthless if you can't follow up with proof.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 03:02 PM
3

that is not an example
/r/MensRights12/08/19 09:37 PM
2

Do you have an example?
/r/MensRights12/08/19 07:09 PM
1

Talking shit about the kettle
/r/MensRights12/08/19 07:06 PM
6

A common tactic for those that don't want you to know the full story. And sadly common around here
/r/MensRights01/07/19 10:10 PM
0

FW:FW:FW:FW:FW:FW:FW:FW:FW:FW:FW:
/r/MensRights01/07/19 10:08 PM
1

1955-2005... AND THEN!? I would be interested in seeing a modern one of these for men and one for women. This is too old. I don't remember anyone talking about the wage gap in 2005.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:33 PM
26

Did you complain? Post the photo to their google reviews and leave one star.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:24 PM
-6

It hurt yes That makes it our problem as well.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 09:27 PM
-5

What if you are not there to help?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 09:03 PM
-5

Are there no women/girls you'd miss?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 07:35 PM
1

I don't want to continue debating Even a mob of commenters is tough to beat.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:15 PM
4

I am a trained fighter The mob does not care.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:31 PM
19

law tends to do that
/r/MensRights19/05/19 06:17 AM
8

A spokesman for Spain’s Vox party, which has been described as far-right and antifeminist Isn't it nice and convenient when a "journalist" prefaces with their own opinion /s Edit: girls being allowed (...), and boys not being allowed I was born in the 70's and this sounds familiar. Ugh!
/r/MensRights17/05/19 03:13 PM
3

I'm dubious. What's your source?
/r/MensRights10/05/19 09:56 PM
10

As it is at any fringe.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:18 AM
1

Agree with the first part. I think the second part is also a puritanical thing. "Christian" is just too broad.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 06:00 PM
1

I'd say it's more of a puritanical thing. "Christian" is a bit broad.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 05:28 PM
-2

Maybe, try finding it yourself. If you are curious about something, look it up. I have seen several posts to this affect in /r/science ;p
/r/MensRights03/05/19 05:24 PM
2

victims rather than as survivors Is there a difference?
/r/MensRights01/04/19 03:11 PM
1

This is some incel strawman level dumbassery right here. This is the reason MRAs are seen as insane and taken less and less seriously. You are not helping anyone but those who seek to tear us down. I see posts like yours and I think how you are probably intentionally seeking out the gulible(sic). Awareness of this “cautionary tale” serves no one. There's nothing here to be cautious of.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 07:45 PM
2

"You're right, after 3" of hair and 4" of fat, I'm pretty much out of dick. Oh well." -A friend who'd heard a girl call him small or something similar a couple decades ago.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 04:07 PM
1

Oh, okay. Well in that case, thanks.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:16 PM
0

Is this account just for shit stirring at 13 days old? а ты говоришь по русски
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:05 PM
-4

Ad hominem does not make the shitty analogy better.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:01 PM
-9

How about thousands? https://www.cr80news.com/news-item/u-maryland-uses-touchless-biometrics-for-dining-hall-access/ It's a stupid analogy.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:36 PM
-7

Is there an echo in here? Edit :https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18224443-400-the-lock-with-two-keys/
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:36 PM
-15

Some locks are designed to be opened by multiple keys. Your analogy is shitty. Edit:https://www.cr80news.com/news-item/u-maryland-uses-touchless-biometrics-for-dining-hall-access/
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:28 PM
3

How does a man act?
/r/MensRights28/01/19 06:47 PM
30

Shut it, fish!
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:29 AM
27

What's the problem here, meow?
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:27 AM
7

Everything else aside, I just can't respect a journalist who uses "literal" like that.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:39 PM
1

I might accuse that Dr. overstepping. Now, if a terminator showed up...
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:29 PM
5

Sounds like something a jury/judge would have considered if the idiot had not fucking skipped bail.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:10 PM
21

negligence that results in death = manslaughter
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:38 PM
7

This is so misleading and OP is an idiot.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:37 PM
4

May as well call 'em uppity.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:52 AM
-2

Not funny.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 01:30 AM
2

Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: Fw: ...seriously
/r/MensRights22/01/19 09:06 PM
-15

Apply the same reasoning to circumcision. Edit: wow. I remember when we used to discuss things here. How about y'all?
/r/MensRights13/01/19 05:51 PM
2

Why the fuck is this guy reading to me?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 05:26 AM
7

I can tell. Why would you pay someone more than they are willing to work for?
/r/MensRights26/12/18 08:11 PM
9

Getting paid is theft... kay
/r/MensRights26/12/18 08:02 PM
3

Eh.. I find it varies with more than just a bit of overlap.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 04:14 PM
5

Sounds like internalized misandry.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 04:11 PM
3

No I don't. It's really not. OK kid.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:57 PM
6

Nope. That's not me, dog.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:44 PM
139

So long as the results of their labor are equal, they do.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:23 PM
17

There are plenty of women who can and do work 80 hour weeks. There just happen to be more men who do. Let's not generalize too much here.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:21 PM
1

https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/11/13/the-u-s-never-dropped-as-many-bombs-on-afghanistan-as-it-did-in-2018-infographic/#2ef209182fae
/r/MensRights17/11/18 04:51 AM
-2

More like a broken clock
/r/MensRights17/11/18 04:46 AM
7

Offering someone (or some thing) an out is absolutely a defense. It's obviously not an attack, and if you are offering excuses for behavior you aren't being neutral.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:14 AM
2

So is he.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:05 AM
2

While this is significantly more than frustrating, women are not a collective consciousness.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 12:03 AM
-6

Make a dating app with this feature and the users will be drowning in dick... Also, this has absolutely nothing to do with men's rights
/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:37 PM
8

Those nose rings always make people look like they have runny noses.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 02:57 PM
6

You are a good speller!
/r/MensRights12/10/18 09:56 PM
8

Planned Parenthood does not automatically mean abortion. That being said, with no other context that seems to be her objective here.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 09:55 PM
0

Probably Russians
/r/MensRights11/10/18 05:23 PM
-7

Were you looking for a smoking gun?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:40 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights26/09/18 10:49 PM
9

maybe do it from a different account than you use to troll Well that's telling. Good job. I bigly can't handle the salty angsty edginess. You got me.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 12:14 AM
8

Wow. You should read my recent comments on this post. Maybe you think you are talking to someone else? For posterity: "That's the way to hearts and minds right there! If you have ever seen divisiveness as an issue, you might want to consider your own contribution." Divisiveness is only a problem when it's between good people. Considering the black-hearted, brain-dead, garbage that gets regularly upvoted in this sub, this post included, I see no real reason why you think anyone would ever want to…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 10:54 PM
3

The irony I was referring to was your claim that nothing is ever said and then saying it yourself in the same sentence. Your new comment above is arguably more ironic.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 10:46 PM
16

Jesus, you sad fucks are sensitive AND illiterate. That's the way to hearts and minds right there! If you have ever seen divisiveness as an issue, you might want to consider your own contribution.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 10:00 PM
2

I don't follow. Can you expand on your meaning? What negative am I arguing?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 09:53 PM
0

There is literally nothing ever said about what is non-toxic masculinity. The most ironic thing I have seen today.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 09:40 PM
14

This sub is so frustrating sometimes. Toxic whatever is just a negative aspect of whatever. Some plants are toxic, but you can still eat a fucking salad and not die! FFS!
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:41 PM
8

with a wall of text defining the "correctness" of your position. RLY?!
/r/MensRights25/09/18 08:24 PM
4

14? 15?
/r/MensRights26/08/18 04:47 PM
0

Still not working for me. What is it? Error 1001 Ray ID: 44d7aee403739b56 • 2018-08-20 20:41:52 UTC DNS resolution error
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:44 PM
1

Broken, and so is your link
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:33 PM
1

trashythingsaretrash
/r/MensRights16/08/18 09:08 PM
6

While I'm appalled and disgusted, I'm also curious how exactly this "cure" is supposed to function.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 05:37 PM
-9

Tucker Carlson thinks?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 11:59 PM
14

Karma whiting WTF is that?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 03:06 PM
0

Killing a baby is never an appropriate response to prevent it. No one seriously advocates for killing babies. Don't be stupid.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 06:47 PM
1

IDGAF about the logic of the statement. I'm not sure why you are so focused on "truth value." Truth Value: ⊥
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:34 PM
1

The context of the post is that we, an often maligned group, are debating the validity of the ideas of a convicted pedophile and white supremacist. As a misunderstood and hated group, we should do our best not to give ammunition to those who would dismiss men's suffering. You may not care where something came from, but many do. This looks bad. Why did MLK encourage protesters to wear their "Sunday best?"
/r/MensRights22/06/18 08:01 PM
1

Does context matter to you, because there's context here. This is the passage in Strom's book where it appears. To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize? We all know who it is that we are not permitted to criticize. We all know who it is that it is a sin to criticize. Sodomy is no longer a sin in America. Treason, and burning and spitting and urinating on the American flag is no longer a sin in Amer…
/r/MensRights22/06/18 05:23 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Alfred_Strom Not a joke.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 05:07 PM
2

Context matters! It matters to me, and it matters to our detractors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Alfred_Strom Here Is the passage, "To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize? We all know who it is that we are not permitted to criticize. We all know who it is that it is a sin to criticize. Sodomy is no longer a sin in America. Treason, and burning and spitting and urinating on the American fla…
/r/MensRights22/06/18 05:06 PM
1

If it is right, it's right like a broken clock is a couple times a day.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 03:49 PM
1

You spell poorly.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 05:18 AM
10

Does the source of a quote not matter to you? It's a quote! The name attached to the quote is where it derives weight. If it is right, it's right like a broken clock is a couple times a day.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 05:17 AM
-3

Considering your user name...
/r/MensRights22/06/18 05:13 AM
0

Voltaire did not say this! I'm not going to look it up right now, but I want to say it was some Nazi pedophile douche guy.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 05:11 AM
1

Um, I believe a "story" was mentioned...
/r/MensRights08/06/18 10:22 PM
10

I NEVER get to use my pitchfork!
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:46 PM
3

Psychology is mostly soft science, but it's better than nothing. I just don't see how it would be possible to avoid "entrusting certain humans to define what does and does not qualify as a 'mental illness'"
/r/MensRights24/05/18 05:02 PM
16

Should we get rid of specialization of labor entirely?
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:37 PM
9

Ok genius settle down I'm sorry I triggered your sensitive little feelings You and people like you are the reason we are often maligned as a hate group. You are not doing men's rights any favors with your derision and hate.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:36 PM
10

My wife recently made me an appointment with a dermatologist I knew to be male. That's what I thought, anyway. Turns out he was booked up and my wife okayed an appointment with his PA. I was quite surprised when two women, young women, young women my age... walked in the room to give me a full body check. I went through the half hour appt., 'cause what else am I going to do? It was a few months ago and I still feel so conflicted and awkward about the experience. I know I shouldn't be bothered. T…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:50 PM
4

Seriously?! Cosmo?! You may as well get angry about what the panhandling crack lady/gentleman said to you on your way to work the other morning. This. Is. Stupid.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 07:51 PM
10

In principle I agree, but I worry about having a cost associated with recanting an accusation. If an accusation is proven to be false, penalties should be very harsh. If it's a case of he said, she said, he/she changed their mind, I think having harsh consequences would be more detrimental to the actual victim.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 05:43 PM
14

I have tried several times.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:11 PM
6

This method of commentary is incredibly annoying. I stopped after 2 minutes and it took a good deal of effort to make it that far..
/r/MensRights01/05/18 10:22 PM
4

This should be worked out individually. If you go on a date with a woman and you have different ideas of who pays, don't go on another date. Or, maybe it's not a big deal to you. If this is something you care about, you should probably discuss it before the date.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 04:10 PM
3

It's important to believe victims. I believe the author.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 03:53 PM
7

Are we restricted to things that are threatening to men's rights? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4j9dzb/maybehedoesnthityou_ok_because_women_arent/
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:06 PM
8

Seriously, who cares if this doesn’t affect you. Why do you care?
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:36 PM
30

How is colored seating a solution to rape? If you need to segregate, do it by sides.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:32 PM
0

What, no Breitbart?
/r/MensRights26/02/18 06:30 PM
3

Cite the sub or Reddit rule ORLY I recall at least two articles Dude! I'm gonna go out on a limb here... You seem pretty lazy. And, your comments are highly ironic.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 04:00 PM
3

Projection has no political affiliation. Bigotry is similar in that regard.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 06:02 PM
7

"No More Mr Nice Guy" I just looked it up on Goodreads. I find it interesting that the top review is in large part about how bad things are for women.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:19 PM
1

I think the point was... They’re not gonna let an ugly person present the news
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:34 PM
1

There's a paywall. I can't find that.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:30 PM
98

The metoo movement makes it hazardous for men to work with women. This makes women less hire-able.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 05:54 PM
9

I was going to call your comment hyperbolic, but the more I think about it the more accurate it seems. The power currently associated with an accusation has to have a chilling effect on how comfortable men can reasonably be around women. I think the net effect here is that interactions become more awkward. If reintroduction of sanity is impossible, this just snowballs.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 05:38 PM
19

There are victims, and there are posers, ya know? In this instance, posers are creating victims.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 05:25 PM
4

Same logic: Why are Saudi women just recently allowed to drive? Why didn't you do something about that sooner? We're all men, right?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 06:54 PM
4

Is there a source on this? I see a guy talking about an article talking about a policy...
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:50 PM
1

I'm suggesting both shoes are likely bots some of the time. If that wasn't clear, I apologise for being vague. And, that's exactly what a Russian bot would say! ;)
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:30 PM
1

Thirded. This place is so frustrating and tiring. Every time I come here I feel the need to confront bigotry. At this point, I only stick around to try and be a voice of reason in the face of hate.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:19 PM
2

Very interesting. TIL http://www.glossophilia.org/?p=4480 I had always assumed it was something about pulling a rope, which made perfect sense with the usage. Turns out it's about putting your toes on an actual line...
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:12 PM
2

Um. Satire? Conspiracy theory: Sometimes I wonder if comments like this come from bots. Think about it. We know Russian intelligence has used fake "feminist" authors to write some crazy hateful shit. Why wouldn't they do the same to us? Really, why not try to push us more fringe. If their goal is divisiveness, this is exactly the kind of bigoted comment that gets seen by an outsider who leaves thinking we're fucking crazy. Why WOULDN'T they have a bunch of Chinese Room style bots saying fringe t…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:59 PM
1

What does it indicate when a woman wants help changing a tire? opening a pickle jar? mowing the lawn..? Nothing! Some people are bad at some things. This author's an idiot. I sometimes wonder how this type of person will look back on their foolishness in 30-40 years. Then again, that might require a degree of introspection. Maybe she'll grow in to it.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 11:57 PM
4

I'm dubious. Please explain.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 03:52 PM
2

Ironically. Like Little John, but the opposite.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 10:11 PM
6

disdain for a person you almost assuredly know nothing about people like you are a disease Mkay, LOL.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 03:06 AM
-5

How do you get this comment so right and then have so much venom in your other comments?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 01:24 AM
6

Sorry to hear you went through that. This place kinda doubles as a support group, so there's a fair amount of bias. I really appreciate your introspection. It's all too rare in these times of virtual anonymity. I hope you were able to thoroughly cut ties with your abuser.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 08:35 PM
8

Interesting. Do you have a source on that?
/r/MensRights04/10/17 05:35 PM
1

I know drag shows can get dirty, but I doubt they always do. That's why most drag shows are 18+ Seems like he has another 9 years before he can get in to a dirty one. He'll probably lose interest by then. I still don't see a problem.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 03:09 PM
2

A kid likes to dress up... Who fucking cares?
/r/MensRights03/10/17 09:21 PM
6

mkay
/r/MensRights03/10/17 08:29 PM
4

Can you walk and chew gum at the same time? Why aren't you only focusing on one thing at a time?
/r/MensRights03/10/17 08:28 PM
14

So? Why do you or anyone else get to tell people what they should be?
/r/MensRights03/10/17 08:24 PM
1

This is a function of feminism, not a function of having a vagina. Men who fall for feminism's BS are just as likely to believe that women are more discriminated against, and be blind to how their attitude effects inequality across the board. When you say it's a problem with women in general, you leave no hope of improvement. When our ideology is aligned in a manner that disparages the majority of our population who also votes more per capita, we're set up for failure. 'isms change more easily t…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:29 PM
1

I'll admit I'm lazy, but can we get a source that's not the fucking Daily Mail? Shit's worthless!
/r/MensRights20/09/17 09:37 PM
1

Uphill battles are harder when you shoot your own feet.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 09:20 PM
12

Maybe. It's still worth fighting, though. IMO it's the difference in being a hate group vs being a political movement.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 06:19 PM
38

most sexist thing about women (modern) feminism There's no need to sweepingly bash women in general here. There are plenty of women who believe in personal responsibility. Sweeping generalizations don't help us.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 05:34 PM
1

Every time I see one of these things it makes me think of the stuff crazy people put all over their walls in movies. It's really just lacking the pushpins and red thread.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 11:12 PM
2

the commitment to fight racism is much more in evidence on feminist sites True, but I think that's probably just that both feminism and anti-racism are both mainstream liberal stances. MRAs seem to come from all over the spectrum. Maybe it was a legit concern, maybe not. I'm curious, do you have a link to anything indicating censorship of BLM topics? It has been my experience that this sub is far less censored than subs like TwoX or Feminism. I'd be very interested to see anything to the contrar…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 05:57 PM
26

history is history All things that have ever happened are either history or prehistory.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 03:25 PM
2

doom porn, cuck, and fetish forums, huh? those do something for you? Edit: Nevermind. I don't care.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 10:44 PM
1

Enough irony to go around, then.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 10:14 PM
2

Do you actually believe you are contributing any substance here? You call me childish and tell me to shut up in the same comment... From what I see in a quick glance at your comment history, you seem fairly reasonable. As context, I'm a precinct chair in the Libertarian party. My original problem with /u/ThatDamnedImp 's comment relates to the way he's playing identity politics here. Anyone who paints with as broad and absurd a brush as he did, I'm going to have a problem with. Repeatedly callin…
/r/MensRights29/08/17 09:15 PM
1

Maybe by then he'll have some level of competence. You might actually be right, I doubt the next 3 years will get his base any closer to recognizing coherent thought.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 07:09 PM
-1

There's that laziness... There are plenty of sources on this. Feel free to pick one that aligns more with what you want to hear. Calling me childish is ironic. The best way to get me to shut up would be if you didn't reply.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 06:27 PM
3

No. Not at all. I know Trump uses the term "fake news" for anything that does not fit in his good boy folder. The application of the "fake news" moniker to everything you disagree with is extremely dangerous laziness. Trump is an incoherent piece of shit, and we'll be lucky if our democracy survives him.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 05:49 PM
2

Why wouldn't there be? I mean, there are over a billion people in India.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 04:31 PM
-2

you lefties Lol, idiot. Does Trump's carpet match the drapes? Edit: That brush you're painting with, it's a bit broad.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 04:28 PM
1

You aren't helping anyone with that shit.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 04:26 AM
1

Then wait until you can... This isn't a verbal conversation.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 04:23 AM
1

That's when you talk about ad hominem
/r/MensRights25/07/17 02:15 AM
1

bad bot?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:53 PM
2

While your scenario certainly exists, the inverse is likely much more common. Women spend more money than men. But really, all relationships are different. You paint with an absurdly broad brush.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:24 PM
1

How do you figure?
/r/MensRights14/06/17 04:59 PM
2

I'd say it is almost anything domestic.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:55 PM
1

as long as you go through the steps to prove and claim that you're the father. Meanwhile, your newborn daughter has just been dropped off at a fire station in the next town over. The mother didn't even mention any names where she left "your" kid.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:22 PM
1

What is the right number of orphans?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:19 PM
2

Like a mother can do any time before a child is 60 days old? (Texas)
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:17 PM
5

Any book?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:03 PM
1

The problem with that is that it puts you in a block of people politicians no longer need to worry over. It sucks, but if you don't vote, you don't matter. Not when it comes to powers we're stuck with. "Democracy is the worst form of government except all the others."
/r/MensRights10/05/17 10:24 PM
0

Right, he wasn't an ideal candidate. I still voted for him... something about overlooking good enough for prefect (he wasn't either). If you hate the two party system you really should vote third party just so we can get on the same damn stage as the republicrats. If you don't like any of the individuals in the two main parties, the only thing a third party vote does is knock the big guys down a notch. Admittedly it's a miniscule notch, but every little bit counts.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 09:06 PM
0

Better candidates will come with a larger share of the vote and more participation. Or, you could actually be fine with the two party system... IDK. I guess I missed it, but who was against private prisons that you got to vote for in the general election?
/r/MensRights10/05/17 08:13 PM
2

After looking through u/lockhherup's last hour or so... I wouldn't be surprised if he/she actually does know the difference between "blacked out" and "unconcious." This is the type of stuff that gets us called idiots and gets us dismissed. I hold OP in the same regard as those who say "victims" should be believed unconditionally. Edit: Missed the double h in OP's handle.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 07:33 PM
-1

Shit source is shit.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 05:39 PM
1

After glancing through your comment history, you seem to be about 12. I hope you don't grow up to be as angry as you seem now. Good luck kid.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 06:37 PM
1

goooo on..... On what? What's the goo on? Don't leave me hangin'.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:41 AM
2

You seem particularly talented with the rhetoric... lol
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:24 AM
1

source?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:20 AM
1

This is the type of "research" in need of funding cuts. It's full of the author's morality judgements and very light on actual data. Do women feel feminine when they make a man orgasm? Who in their right mind would twist that or the inverse in to a bad thing? I also wonder if the other "study" in the article addressed multiple orgasms? Doubt it... We wouldn't want to discuss anything that makes women seem less the victim, would we?
/r/MensRights24/03/17 03:45 PM
2

Sociology, perhaps the softest of the "sciences."
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:58 PM
5

Grown up Meg is not a nice person.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:48 PM
2

That is the account's only comment. I think something's fishy.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 11:07 PM
1

lucky...
/r/MensRights01/11/16 03:08 AM
2

Sometimes, but it is not something inherent to being a teenager. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Youth
/r/MensRights01/11/16 03:04 AM

I like "your right to extend your fist ends at the tip of my nose"
/r/MensRights05/10/16 05:00 PM

Integrity be damned!
/r/MensRights13/07/16 07:10 PM
1

And both are 100% correct.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:11 PM
2

You pretty much always have a glass of air I guess.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:11 PM

If you have a half full glass of water do you not have a glass of water?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:18 PM

I also do go around shooting people I think you forgot the wrong word here I hope
/r/MensRights18/04/16 03:13 PM

...and?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 03:12 PM
3

Hate is just hate, no such thing as "reverse hate".
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:31 PM
2

Steve Harvey is generally reprehensible.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 06:20 PM
1

Do you believe that a group of people deciding something can possibly be infallible?
/r/MensRights09/01/16 03:15 AM
-6

The fact that you use "Think Progress" as a source for anything disqualifies you from any rational thought. Irony
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:46 PM
1

Ah! Thanks, I had no idea.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:19 PM
1

Not exactly what I meant. What's the guy's name? Who is the judge? This doesn't give any details that can be confirmed. I see nothing in that jpg to suggest this is anything but a fabrication.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:35 PM
1

This is absolutely worthless without a source.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:05 PM
1

If you are a teacher, I'd like to encourage you to read all the dialogue below your comment. Sometimes it seems like there are those in this subreddit who want to chase some of us off.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 03:42 AM
-1

To be, or not to be--that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune Or to take arms against a sea of troubles And by opposing end them. To die, to sleep-- No more--and by a sleep to say we end The heartache, and the thousand natural shocks That flesh is heir to. 'Tis a consummation Devoutly to be wished. To die, to sleep-- To sleep--perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub, For in that sleep of death what dreams may come When we have sh…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:34 PM
-3

I never said the context of the application didn't matter. Both the origination and the application matter when it comes to invoking the words of others. If the quote began here, in this thread, do you think it would carry significant weight?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:56 PM
-8

If the words ring true, then that is what matters, not who said them. I totally disagree. Quotes need the context of their source. It doesn't matter what the schizophrenic homeless guy says. His words carry no weight and you should not look for meaning in them. If the quote came from Strom, its meaning is vastly different than if it came from Voltaire. EDIT: FFS people. Here is the entire paragraph in which this quote first appears. To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:52 PM
1

I kinda file this under "No such thing as bad publicity..."
/r/MensRights19/10/15 05:15 PM
15

She might do better monetizing her absence.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 08:21 PM
14

Seems like trolling to me. This would be a terrible idea, as lawyers specialize in various areas of the law.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:15 PM
3

I just say an adult should be capable of manipulating their own environment without having to coerce others to do it for them.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:32 AM
6

...feminist musings
/r/MensRights06/07/15 09:55 PM
1

I just realized I'm on /r/conspiracy[1] You seem confused misled and idiot(sic) all of your comments are. Lol
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:16 PM
1

This place has been absurd for a while now. But, if we leave it becomes more fringe.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 03:28 PM
2

This is a poorly done study. The questions are too simply stated causing the participant to invent scenarios. At least, that is what I would have done as a participant.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:48 PM
2

What's your sample size? Seems low.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:07 PM
5

Or maybe a Frenchman.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:32 PM
1

Hilarious. You are a funny scarecrow. I don't enjoy paying in to welfare if that's what you mean. Whenever you get to the age where interviewing for jobs is a thing and they ask you if you have any questions for them... just say no. You ask dumb questions. Assuming you might be slightly ahead, you should probably quit there. Be aware of your weaknesses.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 04:22 AM
1

You are a walking strawman.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:25 AM
0

What percent of black people do you think are rioting? Hint: starts with lots of zeros I'll even let you pad your number a bit. What percent of Black people have ever rioted? Hint: still starts with a bunch of zeros. You are waiting for the answer to a stupid question. Black people don't have a monopoly on rioting.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:06 AM
0

You made a blanket statement about what black people do. physically ruin lives when they perceive injustice All demographics will have a portion who will react violently to perceived injustice... Or, maybe because they just feel like doing violent things. Stating that any group may be characterized as having a unique response to a given stimulus is racist. SUBSTANCE
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:07 AM
-10

Racist much? Edit: WTF is going on in this sub?! this used to be a place where we talked about the injustices men face. If you need nuance for my unedited comment, it is below.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:32 PM
-3

Were you hurt? I don't understand.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:42 PM
8

Pretty sure you need a follicle to get DNA off hair... fwiw
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:51 PM
18

Are you 12?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:53 PM
11

I'd be interested in seeing that if you can find it.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:51 PM
5

Too stupid, didn't read
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:02 PM
1

Apples are comparable to slightly different apples.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:23 AM
31

COULD! as in has not been determined. In the civilized world, everyone has the right of due process.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 09:02 PM
3

could face life in prison is not the same as could face jail. You don't say! shiny gold sticker Are you trying to drive people away from this sub? What is your goal with language like that? Edit: Tagged you with "shiny gold sticker"
/r/MensRights02/03/15 08:50 PM
4

Well, it is murder... sorry for not finding something that fits exactly. http://www.buryfreepress.co.uk/news/local/latest-news/73-year-old-man-from-barton-mills-could-face-jail-after-admitting-indecent-assault-35-years-ago-1-6564087 The perpetrator hasn't been sentenced yet. That is what "could face" means.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 08:43 PM
6

Yes. http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-suge-knights-bail-revoked-20150202-story.html could face life in prison.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 07:31 PM
1

Yep. The cop probably ran her plates and wanted nothing to do with her.
/r/PussyPass18/02/15 08:10 PM
3

[satire] . Must be a troll! come on!!
/r/MensRights20/01/15 04:10 PM
-1

I often see feminists taking something as a women's issue when it happens to men as well. Rape would be a good example. Maybe the same would have happened to a woman who spoke too loudly, but I bet you a man is more likely to be perceived as dangerously aggressive in general than a woman when their actions are similar. I think that makes this a men's issue.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 11:30 PM
5

Tell them you identify as a girl. Get some girls who will identify as boys to get offended.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:31 PM
1

I think the point really should be that clothing can attract attention. Whose attention is being attracted changes the potential results of wearing provocative clothing. All analogies break down when taken too far.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 12:38 AM
1

In the US we are also required to continue helping once we have started. The classic example would be swimming out to save a drowning person. I'm not sure if it would really apply in this situation though.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:12 PM
3

further reinforcing the idea that feminists see men as a utility
/r/MensRights13/11/14 04:49 PM
1

How?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:43 PM
1

This thread smells like agent provocateurs.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:10 PM
0

no
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:34 PM
12

That graph represents rate of change instead of absolute values. Notice how they start at the same point.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 05:34 PM
4

You have misread the graph.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 05:33 PM
16

This looks like an attempt to start a discussion to you?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:56 PM
1

Kudos. This is the type of comment people need to see when they come looking for the character of an MRA.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:44 PM
3

Appears to be a hoax, but it's pretty telling than many took it seriously.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:48 PM
9

I believe people oppress people. Oppression has likely gone in every conceivable direction at some point.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:18 PM
2

How do you know so much about 50's advertisement?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 03:52 PM
23

Hold on there buddy, this one's a true Scotsman.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 03:49 PM
4

In my opinion
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:35 PM
2

Fuck that! Judges are (mostly) elected. If you don't like what they are deciding, vote against them. Mandatory minimums are cruel to the perpetrator and hobbling to judges and juries.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:00 PM
7

Seems more like a joke on his sexuality to me, but it's stupid either way.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 11:09 PM
-2

This article is stupid and insulting. Yes, it's an annoying issue, but... the fucking writing style is shit. Too much venom
/r/MensRights20/01/14 01:56 AM
0

This is TOTALLY a statistically significant sample size with a control and two nearly identical events!...
/r/MensRights11/01/14 01:36 AM
2

They should go after her for copyright infringement.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 09:54 PM
1

Where has nuance gone?
/r/MensRights24/10/13 11:00 PM
1

104.1 KRBE is a horrible radio station.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 10:48 PM
11

I think of it more as breakup sex.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:56 PM
1

a doctor is a man who docts
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:06 PM
1

I guess there is a lot of tumblr love around here? Maybe?
/r/MensRights27/09/13 07:55 PM
2

http://houston.craigslist.org/for/3944954430.html
/r/MensRights30/08/13 05:34 PM
1

Oh look, you called me a name. Of course viral transmission is is not as simple as any universal percent chance. The point is that in heterosexual encounters, males have a very low chance of becoming infected. The exact chance is not all that important in an individual basis, Dufus.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:55 PM
1

"Your numbers are wrong. I don't have the correct ones, but I know yours are wrong" Um.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:10 PM
1

The only way menopause would have evolved is if there was some advantage to it happening. This probably has more to do with the decreased viability of a child from an older woman and the scarce resources that child would consume. That would be my guess.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 05:17 PM
1

Crowd sourcing has come so far since the days of lynch mobs and witch hunts.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 04:13 AM
6

You are in the wrong place.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 05:17 PM
0

That is so offensive to rocks!
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:15 PM
1

I probably will. It does seem interesting.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 04:24 PM
4

I had no idea. They picked up one of my posts. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1e5dj4/marrying_an_american_man_for_citizenship_and_cash/ It's interesting how they just kinda see what they want to see.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 04:20 PM
3

MRA?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 04:59 AM
4

What a sad myopic thing to say.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 04:58 AM
2

I generally like NPR, but this article really didn't sit right with me. I somewhat applaud the author for coming to different conclusions after exposure to the couple and admitting to it, but I don't know why she still needed to characterize them in the way she did. It seems as though the woman in the relationship is just being acted upon. Like she has no free will -- snatched up by the evil American man... This really seems like it would anger feminists as well, IDK.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 02:36 AM
5

I don't believe this man is being taken advantage of. Both parties are getting what they want out of the deal. I just didn't like how the man is shown in such a negative light while the author seems to have no problem with the actions of the woman. I have no problem with the couple. My problem is with the author. And don't tell me how to feel.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 02:27 AM
2

Guess I got stuck in the comments for a bit.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:00 PM
19

You know, trial by judge is an option.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:20 PM
8

Wonder what portion of that one percent is owned by the queen of England
/r/MensRights09/03/13 02:26 AM
1

I agree with a lot of stuff in this sub, but it's just plain overreaction if this makes you angry.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 01:14 AM
1

Downvoted. There is no such thing as bad publicity.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:21 PM
3

Oh. You were serious?!
/r/MensRights13/12/12 11:23 PM
1

and still I continue to get downvotes from this... Whatever. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:01 PM
0

It is not an acceptable reaction in the exact same way that it is not an acceptable reaction to blame a woman for dressing sexually.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:34 PM
0

Not to mention a person exposing themselves is generally associated with sexual crimes, such as rape. Only when it is a man. from Wikipedia Hypocrisy is the state of promoting or administering virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that one does not actually have or is also guilty of violating
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:28 PM
0

Exactly my point.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:15 PM
-6

Physically assaulting this man for revealing a part of his body that is viewed as a sexual portion of the male body seems hypocritical to me. What is the point of a slut walk?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:45 PM
-10

Their actions are hypocritical. Edit: more concise
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:31 PM
10

You can leave too.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 08:56 PM
3

I'm sure it goes both ways. I guess I should have said I can see how the argument could be made, but I don't really know much about it.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:35 PM
4

You are known as a radical feminist who has written extensively about how the courts and the medical system mistreat women. I can see how the medical system could be mistreating women, but the courts? How?
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:23 PM
3

Like terrorism?
/r/MensRights04/09/12 03:05 PM
9

victim grooming
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:34 PM
4

This looks familiar...
/r/MensRights03/07/12 03:53 AM
3

Just surprised to see my alma mater on something like this
/r/MensRights20/06/12 05:44 PM
22

Was not expecting this... Whoop!
/r/MensRights20/06/12 04:25 PM
12

I am not a meat popsicle.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:12 PM
5

Why give her publicity?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:21 PM
3

Gotta disagree with you there; It's not a job interview. Anyone has the right to turn down a potential sex partner at any point for any reason. I think her attitude is pretty despicable, but she is entitled to her criteria.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 05:24 PM
2

Cry wolf much?
/r/MensRights05/12/11 09:09 PM
1

... until a lot of people switch.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:23 PM
6

*Divorcers I don't believe they ever said anything about cheating during the other show.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:22 PM
2

In other words, the man has his own Internet connection. From this we can conclude that from an economic point he is currently doing better than about 6 billion people on the Internet, who have no such connection to the Internet. Huh?
/r/MensRights05/07/11 02:48 PM
17

Getting so tired of these fake FB things.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 04:28 AM
15

Where are you that you don't worry about the male reaction to you hitting a woman.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 04:36 PM
5

And how can a prosecutor, someone who's supposedly committed to pursuing truth, defend such a miscalculation so brazenly when it appears to have resulted in a 25-year false imprisonment? Here is the problem. Prosecutors are not committed to pursuing truth, they are committed to prosecuting. They pursue convictions.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 09:31 PM
6

Realtor here. That may or may not be true. At least in Texas, if are renting out your own property and you have three or less properties that you rent out, you may discriminate on any grounds you desire.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 03:48 PM
5

HAVE... I would HAVE!
/r/MensRights24/02/11 05:41 PM
7

This one? http://www.eckernet.com/images/0621sexabuse500x250.jpg
/r/MensRights16/12/09 11:42 PM
5

It would make some sense. A flea experiences around 600g when it jumps.
/r/MensRights16/12/09 11:35 PM
18

I think you must mean 50%, 100% less would be $0.
/r/MensRights16/12/09 11:34 PM
25

I think somebody likes little boys.
/r/MensRights29/11/09 06:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter