joalr0 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Redefining concepts into and out of debate; Lack of nuance in nuance I'm still uncertain what your actual claim here is. I'm going to go through this, as simply as possible, line by line, and I want you to tell me the exact point at which you believe things become incoherent. A political patriarchy is one in which men are in complete control of the political structures. The political structure is supported by a set of social structures. These social structures reinforce the political structure through framing the political structure as the "natural way of things"…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	26/01/24 02:03 AM
0	Redefining concepts into and out of debate; Lack of nuance in nuance See here? This is your problem, and the exact thing you agreed against. This is like defining "religion", given examples of a religion, and then saying "see? Your definition is flawed because of these other situations where the religion is different". When feminists talk about patriarchy, they aren't talking about political patriarchy, at least, not in Western contexts. They are talking about social patriarchy. Social patriarchy need not take the same form in every society. I never argued it did…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	25/01/24 05:46 PM
1	Redefining concepts into and out of debate; Lack of nuance in nuance I can absolutely give you some basic working definitions that can get you somewhat of the way there, but basically all of those things would fall under. They aren't contradictory, but would all be elements. A political patriarchy would be one in which a government is, basically by law, run exclusively by men. This has represented the vast majority of societies. Men created the laws, voted, were the leaders, etc. That was the legal state of things. The necessary beliefs in order to justify that w…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/01/24 10:03 PM
1	Redefining concepts into and out of debate; Lack of nuance in nuance People only "know what you mean" because they have a lot of experience with the subject of religion. We are exposed to many examples of religions, and so we, in our own minds, have constructed a concept that aligns with religion, despite not being able to corherently define it. And that's the issue you have with your response here. You said the issue is that it is "incoherent", but then when looking at religion, you didn't provide a coherent definition, you said "people know what I mean". Well, …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	24/01/24 05:16 PM
3	Delusion is strong with this one. Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! A subreddit cannot leak, it is a made up of digital information located on a server and does not contain any liquid! I find your joke to be funny! I am also not yelling, I'm displaying enthusiasm and emotion!	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/03/17 07:56 PM
5	Delusion is strong with this one. So I should have gotten them started?	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/03/17 06:57 PM
21	Delusion is strong with this one. Perhaps it means something to them? I also suspect he might be a little dramatic when he says 'freak out'.	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/03/17 06:46 PM
16	Delusion is strong with this one. I will take your advice and not get you started! Good day, fellow human!	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/03/17 06:43 PM
98	Delusion is strong with this one. Good thing names and headshots are sent out to agents, and not just a pile of potential gender neutral actors. There is really no need to have different names for the same job.	/r/PussyPassDenied	29/03/17 05:48 PM