TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jobosno Archive

View 0 posts and 88 comments by jobosno on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

The issue with using those numbers is that they're using numbers from a year where the Women's World Cup was held when the men were playing games that don't matter at all. A better comparison would be women's numbers from last year to the men's numbers two years ago. The women still bring in less money if you compare the two that way, but the difference isn't that large. In some cases, the women are being paid about 38% what the men are being paid for bringing in only slightly less money. Maybe …
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:14 AM
0

It's relevant to PPD because she worked hard to get where she is and can use that to back up statements like the one she makes in the video. Being in the top 3 isn't bad at all, and you act like these other people being dumbasses is the equivalent of Ronda paying people off to get to the top. So what if she'd be number 3 if the other two were there, what happened happened, and now she's #1. That's just the fact.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/15 01:57 AM
1

I was really wondering why people are getting upset over the absolute garbage that is the Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 06:24 AM
1

The person I replied to made a mention of every theme park if they had these rules.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:53 PM
4

"CONGRATULATIONS YOU JUST WON THE SUPER BOWL, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO NEXT?!" "I HAVE NO KIDS SO DISNEYWORLD TREATS ME LIKE A PEDOPHILE!"
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:50 PM
0

I'm not sure why you've been downvoted, you certainly contributed a valid point to the discussion. I'd upvote you twice if I could.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:29 PM
1

Another post that fails to distinguish between feminists and radical/militant feminists... Not all feminists are unreasonable psychos. In fact, I would bet that they're not in the majority by a long shot. This shouldn't be hard to do: Distinguish between feminists and radical feminists. If you want people to take MRM seriously, we have to treat feminists with the same level of respect. This means recognizing that there are different groups within the movement instead of lumping them all into one…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 05:16 PM
4

Some of us would rather let the person know in a way that shows that we think they can listen without being ordered around.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 06:05 PM
1

It makes sense, though. If there's limited time to show each event, why would they show the less popular one? I'm not sure why this is a problem. It's the same with regular programming versus women's sports too: Would women's sports get more viewers than regular programming? I don't know anything about those stats, but I'm going to assume they show regular programming most of the time they're not showing men's sports because regular programming nets more viewers.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 11:50 PM
-3

I could see this being an issue if the price difference was done just to be petty, but there are reasons behind it that make sense when running a business/venue. Not to mention that this is posted all the time and the idea is always explained: They do it to make more money. It really isn't that hard to figure out. If it makes them more money to charge someone more, and it's legal and practical, then they'll probably do it. Bottom line is that things like this just make sense from a business stan…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 11:14 PM
5

I'm with you there. I was just pointing out that judging from her criticism, we can't celebrate too much either.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:36 AM
1

Because subreddits like /r/science or even /r/birdswitharms are all about "nice guys"
/r/MensRights22/01/13 12:16 AM
8

Can I just point out that if you watched more than 25 seconds into the video, you would notice that her views also run counter to the existence of this subreddit. She said that when you focus on one group's equality ("women's rights or gay rights or whatever") that it separates people too much. Fine, celebrate it if you want, but I think we're missing the fact that that little quote tells a little about us too.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 12:12 AM
3

Actually, they're "equally emotional" according to your link.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 11:48 PM
3

I'd go so far as to say SRS is a good thing. It keeps those people contained in one subreddit (except for the downvote brigades and such) as opposed to a single layer of filth that covers all of reddit. They can share what they disagree with with others who think similarly, instead of posting individual circlejerk-type comments that we'd have to deal with in much greater volume on every thread. EDIT: I realized that in my tired state I may not have explained this adequately. Criticism encouraged…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:42 AM
2

No, you see, children is possible (likely) but dignity is certainly gone.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:01 PM
1

His whole comment history is hateful.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:34 AM
2

Somebody should seriously do this.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:28 AM
3

It feels strangely appropriate to read that in Liam Neeson's voice
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:32 PM
–

"Hey kid, I have cauliflower, but it's in the back of my van."
/r/MensRights14/08/12 01:53 PM
4

I agree with most of what he says. The one person that said "there are two sides to every story," he made a blind assumption of his own. Assuming they were like the others, it's reasonable to say that they were siding with the woman, but as he's been saying, we don't know anything else. This person could be saying the same as him, we don't know. He addressed the rest of it relatively well though. I could've done without him flipping the bird, but he still makes good points.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:22 AM
2

And thank for you that. I'd rather not see this blow up more than it has.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:07 PM
20

"It's not that men are an issue, it's that ladies think they're an issue."
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:17 PM
2

Not necessarily, not in my experience. Having people remark on it does get old after a while. Then again, I suppose one would have the same problems being a "short-arse."
/r/MensRights24/07/12 04:25 PM
–

And then you get called things like the "quiet giant."
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:35 AM
–

I'm just hoping the point is to sneak it out of the box before I can see it so I won't know until after I've worn it. If that doesn't succeed, I wouldn't wear it once.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 09:28 AM
–

I was really wondering how this is supposed to solve anything. I can imagine a few scenarios, but I hope that people would be smart enough to know that someone simply doesn't have to wear the ring. Especially because I wouldn't wear that thing twice if it did that.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 07:31 AM
2

Understood.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 04:24 PM
1

I assuming you meant precede, but if you meant proceed: That is an oddly worded comment.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 03:22 PM
1

Exactly my question. It's precautionary. All about typical behaviors for drivers with similar characteristics
/r/MensRights27/05/12 03:37 PM
1

What happens here is they assume men are more likely to showboat or race with their vehicles. Same reason you pay more for a Civic than an Accord, because people like to jag around in their Civics.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 08:31 PM
2

It's also highly likely that I have schizoid personality disorder. Whether or not they're tied, I don't know. That'd be the only way I know to explain it. To answer your second set of questions, I'm a heteroromantic asexual. I'm also not necessarily interested in relationships, but I'm not opposed to the idea either. EDIT: The short version of what a schizoid is: generally someone with a narrowed range of emotional strength and variety, and little to no interest in forming relationships outside …
/r/MensRights08/05/12 06:54 PM
3

Reasonable question there, no offence taken.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 06:53 PM
2

Ironically, by saying he's too skilled to play with girls, they're implying that girls aren't skilled enough to compete with a talented boy.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:17 AM
–

As a far "leftie" who is also an avid supporter of MRM, fuck you. I won't point out the difference once more between what's branded as communism and actual communism, but there's a second axis as well. This leaves room for authoritarian lefties (the ones you speak of) and libertarian lefties. Even then, it doesn't matter who's who, because this is matter of "does it make sense to put ____ on the same level as __?" The difference here is how you handle it, not which group you decide to piss on to…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:15 AM
–

Perhaps being an asexual means I'm a bit more angered than most, but most of the guys I know would hate to live a life like a porno, as they have stated in the past.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 02:57 AM
–

NC is 16 as well.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 02:54 AM
1

Gareth321 is offering to look things up for you. Do you have evidence for this?
/r/MensRights06/05/12 01:53 PM
4

Fitness being one of the qualifications to be a man, apparently.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 01:37 PM
1

Sorry, I was commenting on the links you posted. Needed to clarify that a bit more.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 12:49 AM
2

Remember folks, it's okay to hate sexism but be ageist! Also: Wait, what the fuck? Women are all sensible people who don't do crazy shit, but men can totally make up stories like deranged creatures? Because we're allegedly a hate group doesn't mean we're all bat-shit insane. Those people exist, but in almost any group, they're not the majority. And I thought she didn't read /r/MensRights because it disgusted her? Then why is she scouring comments? It's clearly written to be antagonistic.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 12:31 AM
6

You're clearly not a fan of being fair.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 07:16 PM
2

Just because we don't share one person's skewed idea of good humor doesn't mean we don't appreciate a truly good joke.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 07:14 PM
2

WHOA HEY GUY YOU CAN'T PISS STANDING UP SO BACK OFF
/r/MensRights14/04/12 10:42 PM
3

I'm assuming absolutely nothing would happened if she lived there as well. Hence "fuck his room" and not "fuck his house"
/r/MensRights05/04/12 03:27 AM
2

I read that as: Ginny, a college senior who was allegedly raped Her other remarks destroy credibility.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 09:12 PM
3

This is akin to minimum-level rage for me, for this type of incident... On second thought, it's probably a step up from covering her entire property in lunch meat.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:00 AM
1

I know there's little substance in this comment, but your username is great.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 09:35 PM
1

Progress comes in baby steps... Do you propose a better way?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:37 AM
1

Because most people don't knowingly stare at someone.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 07:57 PM
–

Good point. There's a difference between the quick glance because it's natural, and the several-minute-long stare. Thus, there needs to be a difference in treatment.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:11 AM
1

What the hell am I reading, this shit is shit...for both genders.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:06 AM
1

TIL that I should be supporting thought-crime legislation because the Internet always has sensible people informing me of what I should believe...based on my political stance
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:44 PM
3

Upvoting because your posts makes too much sense to have a negative score
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:08 PM
1

I match that.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 06:04 PM
2

Not like me asking how I would even know that person could change that
/r/MensRights04/02/12 06:04 PM
1

Not me, at least
/r/MensRights04/02/12 06:03 PM
–

There's a difference between those who question, and those who reject (almost literally) everything they are told is sensible. The latter, they are called feral children.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:16 AM
1

Simple: equaliser = letting incompetent people win so those who worked hard to achieve can be stripped of awards by the lazy
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:13 AM
–

Amen to your conclusion there. I'm a democratic socialist, and people assume that supporters of men's rights are spoiled white guys who like to feel picked on.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:10 AM
–

I must be using an outdated definition of truth...
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:01 AM
5

Not to mention the fucking nutcases Re: JeremiahMRA (Loving the post history, by the way)
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:58 AM
1

I suck at math too, can I get a special tiebreaker privilege and such?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:56 AM
3

Also that "the fact men's rights movements exist is offensive." ... Talking about being an asexual MRA makes people have quite a reaction.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:42 AM
1

Wish I could upvote this twice, once for honesty, and the other for pity.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:38 AM
–

"his" children. That's the biggest issue with your argument. Let me know when you give birth to a child by impregnating yourself. Also, I'd like to know how it feels to carry that child around for nine months.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:37 AM
3

Watch out, don't bring up that any parent who has to fight for their kids will be happy if they can still see them. Happiness is taboo if you have genitalia.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:35 AM
2

If there are boyfriends, it shall be remedied...permanently.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:32 AM
-2

I didn't really take the time to read the words in your post, but... FTFY
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:29 AM
–

Karma count right now: Timmain: 28 JeremiahMRA: -87
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:27 AM
6

What a great poster boy you would make for the MRA movement...I'd suggest getting a new username so you don't make a joke of yourself
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:22 AM
2

depends on "how bad of a meth addict" they are
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:19 AM
5

You know you're retarded when you have that low of a rating, and someone named Donkey_Schlong has to talk sense into you
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:16 AM
–

reluctant upvote for a brilliant comment up until "because they are women"...yes, it's treated as a less serious offence, but you make it sound as if it's a situation deserving a life sentence where they've only been sentenced to two days EDIT: Yes, it pisses me off as well, but I disagree with that phrasing.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:10 AM
1

Because this is /r/mensrights, not /r/WTF
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:04 AM
0

Now that's more likely
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:06 PM
–

"because I have first-hand knowledge about every issue!"
/r/MensRights03/02/12 03:40 AM
1

So are we to assume that the grade was minor positive compared to the sex?
/r/MensRights03/02/12 03:03 AM
–

Pros - More fun than filing a complaint Cons - ....
/r/MensRights02/02/12 04:15 AM
4

Forget boys, what about the WOMEN AND CHILDREN
/r/MensRights02/02/12 04:11 AM
0

As much as I'd like to get an A, I'd also like to make sure that I'm not being preached to when I'm paying to be lectured on something else entirely.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 04:06 AM
1

Neither do I. I'm bouncing ideas, not necessarily saying they apply to me. People generally believe France is somehow far inferior to other militaries, so the reference made sense to anyone who has an idea of what some people see. I personally don't see the reason to put these types of "men" into the military.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:59 AM
–

So we can see what it's like to have France's reputation
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:47 AM
1

I will assume that if you were to ask the author of list what makes a girl a woman, they'd be the type to give you an answer akin to "when she has her first period"...yet we must work on it.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:45 AM
1

increasingly so
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:44 AM
1

Or in my case, asexual.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:41 AM
0

except in 13-year-old fantasy world, pussy is a good thing in any sense
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:40 AM
3

TL;DR Boys = Men if they do guy stuff Girls = Women if they compromise
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter