joc346 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-1	You are not entitled to shit. She is not entitled to shit. One of these is reinforced by society. Oh, ok, yeah, definitely. The original post leaves it up to interpretation through and I'm thinking through all the scenarios, some where this is very accurate and some where the OP is very fucked up in this mindset.	/r/TheRedPill	11/04/17 07:22 AM
1	You are not entitled to shit. She is not entitled to shit. One of these is reinforced by society. You gotta decide if it's worth it. She's asking you to go out of your comfort zone. Is she providing enough for you to do so? As we discussed earlier, no one owes anyone anything, but if she finds someone attractive who's willing to do what you're not, then I wouldn't be surprised if she picked the person that is willing to satisfy more of her needs, tbh.	/r/TheRedPill	11/04/17 07:20 AM
-2	You are not entitled to shit. She is not entitled to shit. One of these is reinforced by society. Did you read one of my earlier comments? I personally prefer relationships where me and my SO can be friends. If your girl doesn't see you as a confidante, someone she can vent to, have fun with, is attracted to and can have sex with, you're doing something wrong, fyi.	/r/TheRedPill	11/04/17 07:16 AM
-1	You are not entitled to shit. She is not entitled to shit. One of these is reinforced by society. I agree, if someone is not having their needs met, look elsewhere. Find someone who can meet your needs. However, if you're looking at relationships in terms of who owes who what and how to punish your SO for not giving you what you want, no one is going to be happy. I also see it as a pros/cons situation. It's hard to find someone will satisfy you in EVERY way, and if your SO turns down your sexual advances for personal reasons why would you "punish" them? What makes you the person that gets to…	/r/TheRedPill	11/04/17 06:33 AM
2	You are not entitled to shit. She is not entitled to shit. One of these is reinforced by society. Understandable. These games are dumb. However, we don't know the exact circumstances for the original post. If someone (the woman) rejects sexual advances for some personal reason (such as being on her period) the OP is essentially arguing he can withdraw affection as a punishment because he owes her nothing. When it comes to casual sexual relationship, of course, I agree she shouldn't expect anything in return other than the simple sexual exchange, but it's a different situation completely when…	/r/TheRedPill	11/04/17 04:59 AM
1	You are not entitled to shit. She is not entitled to shit. One of these is reinforced by society. That depends on how you view relationships. If I'm in a relationship I definitely want to be able to tell my SO everything, laugh with them, have fun together, etc. like friends would, but that's me personally.	/r/TheRedPill	11/04/17 03:27 AM
0	You are not entitled to shit. She is not entitled to shit. One of these is reinforced by society. I agree, if the relationship doesn't provide what you're looking for, get out. However, it's biased to assume this only happens to men. There are plenty of women with high libidos who are in a sexless relationship. It has more to do with finding someone with a similar sex drive and who doesn't withdraw sex as a "punishment" because that's childish just like withdrawing affection as a "punishment" is childish.	/r/TheRedPill	11/04/17 03:21 AM
2	You are not entitled to shit. She is not entitled to shit. One of these is reinforced by society. Sounds like, "If we don't have sex, I'm giving you the cold shoulder." That'd be fucked up if this were the case in a relationship. Would you give a friend the cold sholder for not doing something you ask, for example moving into your new apartment? That shit would build resentment--if you're only my friend when I do stuff for you.	/r/TheRedPill	10/04/17 11:18 PM