TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

joejohnson123 Archive

View 5 posts and 79 comments by joejohnson123 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I was going to contribute but it wasn't worth it until 501c3 status
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:54 AM
-1

What other things do AVFM contribute to?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:53 AM
1

Or just get the taxpayer to support the kid
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:57 AM
49

Feminism is all about: 1) Women removing all obligations from themselves and "standards" from themselves. They are to receive all the benefits. 2) Men having all the obligations placed on them and "standards" strongly applied. Men are to get no benefits. Its really that simple. Feminism is female supremacy
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:49 AM
16

There are multiple "reasons": 1) Media brainwashing them about MRA being "evil" 2) Beta males trying to "White Knight" females thinking they will get more action. 3) During your early 20s, women are at their PEAK in attractiveness. It is hard to overcome this powerful force. However, when women get OLDER, men become more realistic about them due to declining sexual power. 4) Academia brow beating men into saying MRA is bad and feminism is good. They can be failed in their "social science" classe…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:47 AM
1

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/12/opinion/12sibert.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 Another article about the HIGH number of female physicians who work part time or drop out of medicine. Ergo, the picture if FAR more complicated than the simple BLS statistics. You need to tease them out for "part time" work patterns
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:40 AM
1

Here is another article about how female MBAs mostly work "part time". http://news.vanderbilt.edu/2013/04/women-elite-education-work-less/ The participation of women in FULL TIME employment is at all time lows since the start of feminism. Note that ONLY 35% of women from ELITE MBAs work full time.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:34 AM
-1

No where near as bad as Sex and the City for polluting the female mind. Where do you think these women get the idea of wasting their best years on "bad boys" and "projects" and then there will be a happy ending with a Mr Big at the end.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:24 AM
1

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2013/04/17/Why-Women-Are-Leaving-the-Workforce-in-Record-Numbers Just one article among many discussing female's dropping labor rates. Also, women are working more "part time" jobs than ever before. Ergo, if a female works even 1 hour/ week, she is considered "employed".
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:23 AM
-1

Maybe you should find out. Its the main reason for many late 30s and 40s spinsters these days. They all "waited" for a Mr Big and ended up alone because they wouldn't "settle"
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:13 AM
3

Women will always "complain" about stuff to extract resources out of men. They used to have to extract wealth from men though marriage. However, with the GOVT and no fault divorce, they can rape men financially without giving them ANYTHING in return. Its the feminist ideal.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:13 AM
-1

LOL looks about right
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:12 AM
0

Name any other show that was worse than Sex and the City for the female psyche. I truly believe women believe this delusional bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:09 AM
0

Yeah but how many of your female acquaintances have? Its probably the worst show out there for women. They are all basically sluts who sleep with tons of men. They live like queens with models and Mr Big's chasing their old, used asses.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:06 AM
0

Yes but I think Sex and the City has worsened them a great deal. My ex girlfriend's dumbass used to watch the show. I would tell her that Mr Big wouldn't go for a horse faced OLD slut like SJP. He would be marrying/banging a young 22 y/o supermodel. She thought that was "mean"
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:05 AM
0

High status men will marry women much younger and more attractive than SJP. They are NOT interested in her. If women got this idea, they would make better choices during their peak years. Unfortunately, most women think there will be a Mr Big waiting for them after they "had their fun".
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:00 AM
0

Correction. This is why POST WALL used goods SLUTS hate "men's rights". Men aren't supposed to have any standards when it comes to marrying women. According to feminists, men should man up and "marry that slut" after she is done getting pounded by the "bad boys".
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:58 AM
0

LOL it sounds pretty good. They almost fooled me!
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:57 AM
-1

I am getting tired of these FEMALE SUPREMACISTS claiming they actually "care" about men. They are saying this because they are concerned that the MRA is gaining steam and want to counter it by saying "they care too"
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:53 AM
1

Feminism and facts don't mix.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:52 AM
1

What is this bullshit?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:36 AM
5

Yes but break down the labor participation rates for women in the 25-54 age group. Its at all time lows.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:25 AM
1

The number of women between 25-54 are the LOWEST on record. Can't really call that an age group for "retirement" or "school" for the vast majority of them.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:21 AM
-1

Just checked it. Looks like it got a bump this month. Thats good. It had collapsed for the last 4 months if you look at the ratings. It is ranked 14,565 of all websites. Unfortunately, it is still lower than sites like even "Stormfront" the White nationalist site is ranked at 13,500.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:20 AM
4

Correct, the few women who work usually do govt stuff like "social worker" or govt employee. Rarely are women in productive fields.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:30 AM
1

Maybe you should study the labor participation rate of women from 25-54. Your analysis is nonsense. The baby boomer issue was ONLY ONE facet of the problem. Women from 25-54 are WORKING LESS than EVER since feminism STARTED. I am speaking facts. Look it up.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:30 AM
-2

Not equally gynocentric as the West. Lets stop pretending its equal
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:28 AM
3

Yes but who pays when she has a kid with a "loser" with no money?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 12:28 AM
21

Feminism is about FEMALE SUPREMACY. Lets not kid ourselves. Now that men are less likely to support them (or unable to support these women due to low wages), women are STRONGLY pushing for GOVT to support them. Single moms are the biggest drains on the economy. If 56 million women aren't working (even though they are of working age), who is allowing them to exist? So much for the "myth" of the INDEPENDENT woman. Also, half the "jobs" women have are BULLSHIT government jobs with no utility for th…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 10:59 PM
1

That is true. Most movements are done by the good minority of people. I think if we can overcome the feminists, we will win.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 10:54 PM
6

It is a wealth transfer from MEN TO WOMEN. That is why women vote for the collective democrats that support significant wealth transfers. The welfare state benefits single moms the most
/r/MensRights07/03/15 10:53 PM
5

Yeah so much for the "pay gap". Women have found out that working isn't "fun" and want to get back on the dole of both the govt and men. They don't want the obligations of serving the male provider though. They just want his money without giving him anything for it.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:39 PM
1

Haven't been charged with rape yet lol Its hard to prove against me.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:35 PM
1

I figure Islam will continue to grow quickly in the Western world, especially among disillusioned males. Under Islam, men are given a powerful position. The men who are lower on the economic ladder might find that very appealing compared to their lot in the feminized Western world.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:35 PM
1

Yes pussified Western men have essentially given up their societies to women. They have failed the biggest collective SHIT test in HISTORY. Patriarchal societies always win out in the end.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:25 PM
1

I try to skew the SMP value in my favor as much as possible. WINNING
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:24 PM
2

The analysis is too simplistic. it is correct but too simplistic. It basically only says that men trade resources for sex. This is true but incomplete. Not all women hold the same "value" sexually. Women's value decreases when they are: 1) Older 2) Less Attractive 3) Fat 4) Single Moms 5) High Sexual Partner Count Female sexuality is largely a DEPRECIATING asset. On the other hand. men's resource development INCREASES as they get older. Their incomes/assets increase when they get older. Ergo, it…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:24 PM
1

Correct
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:05 PM
6

The Islamic world doesn't appear to have the same issue with White Knighting as the Anglo Western world. China has made divorce laws that are in FAVOR of men and NOT women. Most parts of the "patriarchal" world doesn't support feminism. This level of "White Knighting for feminism" exists mostly in the Anglo Western world that is DYING demographically.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:02 PM
2

Wasn't a bad video for once. I agree that men are being stereotyped into having to be "muscular, tall, etc". At least she spoke about the unfair standards applied to body type, height, "provider" status and even women asking out men. Not that bad for a feminist.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 08:00 PM
9

It appears women don't like to work very much according to labor stats. They much prefer living off of Uncle Sam or MEN. This despite the record amount of Affirmative Action and Quotas given to women in both academia and employment.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:55 PM
1

I would add: 1) Prenup 2) Low Sexual Partner count 3) Not too old
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:53 PM
1

Why give up pussy entirely if you don't have to? I still like to bang women. I just control my interactions with them.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:39 PM
1

Yeah read about it on MGTOW forums. The rest of reddit is basically worthless to me. I just read that this "men's rights" area had over 100K subscribers and was happy to see it. However, was a little depressed when I saw the other crap subreddits had millions of subscribers for stupid shit like "photos" or "creepers".
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:39 PM
1

I think a lot more men are going MRA and MGTOW without openly saying it or realizing it. The more this information is given out to men in general, the BETTER things will get.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:37 PM
-1

It concerns me because a lot of MRA men are NOT using scrutiny to determine where the money is going. It is incumbent on men to understand where their money is going if they are donating to an MRA campaign. Elam was full of shit on MGTOW too. Married men can't be MGTOW.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:36 PM
1

They don't have to "give it up entirely", just don't let it dictate terms to you. Its funny how much MORE pussy you can get when you are firm and don't allow it to control you.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:35 PM
2

Correct analysis
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:34 PM
3

Fat slob women don't want to ever have to "prove their worth". They like to have expectations for MEN but never for themselves. Really that simple.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:53 PM
1

Really hope so. It appears to be growing when I talk to younger guys (20s to 30s). The unbelievably high divorce rates are causing this issue to come to the surface as well.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:36 PM
1

Yes basically Reddit is a piece of shit website but at least there is a "men's section". Its worthless outside of that. Why the fuck would I come onto reddit? Photo sub reddit? Creepers sub reddit? Fuck THAT
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:26 PM
1

This article doesn't make any sense. Don't know what she is saying here lol Typical female illogical article.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:24 PM
1

Don't know what that is.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:59 PM
40

Typical female shaming techniques. Men are waking up to this stuff and it is losing its effectiveness. We need to change the mentality of the "White Knight" who defends these "women" regardless of their slutty/bad behavior.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:39 PM
5

Good post. I think the "awareness" of men's issues are growing. We need to spread it through email campaigns and internet drives. More men being exposed to this material will likely open their minds.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:34 PM
1

Good. Men really need to avoid marriage with women these days. I truly believe when men remove COMMITMENT from the "love" game, women will truly be in trouble. If beta males keep wifing up SLUTS, we will remain in significant trouble.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:26 PM
0

I think with the internet, we can counter the mainstream media becoming a fraud. People realize that the media is biased. I think we can reverse this through the internet.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:12 PM
3

I am just a little disappointed that more men aren't waking up to this reality. Since I was a little kid, I was upset about the unfair treatment between men and women. Are the feminist sites getting more traction than MRA or MGTOW sites?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:49 PM
-1

I have gone to his website. I am rather neutral on Paul Elam as well. I actually supported the AVFM conference last year in Detroit. The problem that arose was the lack of transparency in his funding. He received over 60K (31K for "security" and 30K for the conference) when the venue was only a VA that cost him at most 10K. The "security" was all in house and definitely cost about 5K or less. Where did the rest of the money go? Also, AVFM's website appears to ask for donations of 40K/quarter (16…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:45 PM
1

I actually really wanted to donate around the time of the AVFM conference. But when I found out the lack of 501c3 status and lack of transparency, I had to decline. It is upsetting because I would like to donate to a men's right group but without knowing the specifics of WHERE my money is going, I have to decline. I want to see a good 70-80% being allocated for actual men's rights causes.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:42 PM
-1

How much is he bringing in with donations? I thought they were pulling in 40K per quarter. Anita Sarkessian is far worse. She got something like 400K after she claimed to be "threatened" by video game nerds.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:40 PM
1

Fuck "international" women's day. Thanks in advance
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:28 AM
1

We don't believe your bullshit about being with "250 women each". That just ruined this post.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:18 AM
-1

What is "trolling" about my factual comments?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:45 AM
16

Sandberg is a joke. She totally lived off of Mark Zuckerberg. She couldn't create SHIT on her own. Typical feminist living off men.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:16 AM
0

How much do they raise per year?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:09 AM
-2

Fuck those feminist sites. Feminists are pieces of lying shit. That isn't the argument here though.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:03 AM
-1

If there are other threads mentioning this topic, I will bring it up. You sound like a feminist trying to "ban" people. Pathetic for a men's rights group. I don't think everyone should do it "my" way. I am arguing my perspective. Is men's rights going to become like the feminista blogs that don't allow disagreements?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:03 AM
-2

If you're stupid enough to part with your welfare check and give it to Paul, more power to you. I work hard for my money, therefore I will be discerning in who I give funds to.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:43 AM
-2

Are you one of the guys under Paul's employ? Maybe he spends that money trying to get weak pussy beta males like yourself to defend him.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:34 AM
-3

You mad bro? You seem angry. Maybe you need to get some therapy
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:21 AM
-1

He's not that popular. His ALEXA rating has collapsed while MGTOW is growing. Ergo, that analysis is incorrect. Furthermore, your immature ad hom attacks proves my point to be correct.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:20 AM
-1

I was thinking about giving money until I realized the non transparent nature of this situation.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:18 AM
-2

Nice straw man argument. Now try to attempt to defeat my arguments in a rational manner. That is much more difficult.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:10 AM
3

There is NOTHING slut "shaming". Women with many sexual partners are NOT good long term relationship material.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:31 AM
0

How is it "men's business" when we don't even know where the MONEY IS GOING? Maybe it's going to Elam's pockets?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:27 AM
-1

Ok that makes it EVEN WORSE! If he doesn't pay his writers, doesn't give money to Victor Zen, etc why does he pocket 100s of thousands a year to run a website? Illogical man!
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:21 AM
1

The donors should be concerned as well.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:15 AM
-2

Yeah but why the lack of transparency? Would like to see where the money is actually going. Why do they require 100s of thousands of dollars to just run a website? What real world men's groups are they giving money to support? Also, when they "sponsor" Victor Zen, it appears they also ask for more "donations" to support him. They don't appear to give much out of the AVFM coffers.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter