TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

john_nash1 Archive

View 3 posts and 53 comments by john_nash1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lol, don't mind the downvotes. They don't realise how their language and behaviour is similar to the very same thing they despise.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/21 08:24 AM
3

WTF! I can't believe this is actually true!
/r/MensRights05/11/21 09:24 PM
3

And the other man is still the neighbor. The point in this argument that by making his wishes known before birth, the father loses all rights and responsibilities towards the child. So being the biological father would be like beeing any other blood relative, a genetic relation without any legal responsibility.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 06:13 PM
3

This is true, but why should the best interest of the child be the top priority here? the important thing here is to note who has the sole responsibility, which is the mother. This is like saying: there is a poor family that has a child that they can't pay for their needs. We have two choices, either let the child suffer, or make their rich neighbor pay for the child. It is clear here that this is a ridiculous proposition, because it is not the responsibility of the neighbor, even though this wi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 04:35 PM
5

I don't think OP is arguing that financial abortion and regular abortion are the same. He is arguing that if we accept that the fetus is not alive until it is born, this means that if the father decides to financially abort the baby at that point, he is not abandoning a baby, he is abandoning a lifeless fetus. If the mother decides to not abort the baby, even knowing that the father does not want it and is not going to financially support it, then it is her choice and her responsibility. The fac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 10:30 AM
6

Their argument is that paper abortion hurts a child(that is alibe). Because it works when the child is born. While actual abortion happens when it is still a fetus(so not alive). They ignore the fact that if the intention for a paper abortion is stated before birth, this makes the choice to bring the fetus to life, according to their concept of life, the choice of the mother, and so, her responsibility. This is a combination of a selective application of the concept of responsibility. And anothe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 10:07 AM
65

If you feel that way, maybe you should consider unsubscibing from Netflix and send them an email saying why you unsubscribed. If enough people do this, they will change. They are capitalists above all else. I know it is inconvenient, but this is the only thing that has any chance of working. This this is the reason why they would put misandrsit content all the time, but would not put something like "the red pill" documentary, for example. Because they know that feminists will definitly boycott t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 08:05 AM
2

Who is typically reluctant to marriage and commitment? Men or women? I think seeing who fantasies about it and who run away from it is all you need to know not just who is marriage really good for, but also what people think who marriage is good for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 11:08 AM
4

You will never get rid of all ridicule and generalixation. There will always be people who call themselves x who say bad things. People can use this to claim x is bad. You can try to mitigate this by distancing yourselves and your spaces from these people. But if you take a lesson from feminism, the effective solution is to not care about the craziness of some of your ideas or members, but to create an effective one or two sentence argument that is intuitive and simple to wedge your ideas throug…
/r/MensRights21/10/21 08:01 AM
1

Lol, don't you have something better to do with your life than stalking my old comments?
/r/MensRights17/10/21 01:06 PM
3

Well I think someone asking you out and someone running towards you suddenly late at night are two completely different situations, and hardly comparable. I completely agree. I made sure to mention that. I was just trying to make a general argument. That in case of a danger to your life, it would be acceptable, but not when you are uncomfortable that someone "creepy" is asking you out. . Even if I did calculate those 5% odds in that moment Maybe i was very abstract in my analogy, but what i mean…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 06:22 PM
2

If its reasonable, how is it stereotyping? Say there is some stranger running towards you late at night. You could have dropped something on the ground and he is bringing it to you. He could be just running in the street unrelated to you. He could also be running to kill you or rob you. At that moment you will make a judgement, based not on your knowledge of the person, but on probabilities and statistics, and your experience. If you are smart, you will make a passemistic judgement erring on the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 05:40 PM
5

TBH i think everyone should have the right to do whatever they think they need to do to keep themselves safe (regardless of how it affect other peoples feelings) as long as you don't interfere with other people's freedom of cours. I think it is okay for women to cross the street or move faster if they feel scared from a man behind them. But we should be honest what this is. It is stereotyping and generalisation. It is no different than someone crossing the street when they see a black man. Or fe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 04:44 PM
2

How do you compare what is produced with the cost? I mean child birth alone (production of human resources) is a major unique contribution to women. Besides, If that was true, they would have been selected out by evolution long time ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/21 07:53 PM
2

Yes, in that case, it might well be a better situation short term. However, IMO this is one of the topics where it is good in the immediate future, but the changes that it will do to our moral and value structure would outweight the benefits. Kind of like bodily autonomy (forced vacination) or free speech ( criminally punishing offensive speach). I think directly manipulating the demographic composition of society is one of those linew that we shouldn't cross, regardless of any apparent benifits…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/21 07:45 PM
3

It is true that men's lives are seen to be less intrinsically valuable than women's lives, But they are still seen as valuable. This is why for example many countries are trying to abolish the death penalty and why euthanasia is illegal in most places.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/21 01:19 PM
7

It is not about how beneficial it would be. The problem is ethical. Discussing how some population have less worth and don't deserve to exist as other groups is wrong. Starting from the late 20th century, the world began to adopt a principle that human life is inherently valuable. I think we let go of this principle at our peril. When some people say things like that, they are basically saying that the problem with racism or sexism is that the groups under questions are not inferior (jews in the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/21 08:41 AM
4

What do you mean? Was there an attempt to eradicate women in the 17th century?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/21 08:10 AM
9

The idea isn't realistic for many reasons. I just didn't think addressing it was that important tbh. I found the idea of someone proposing this is in its self horrendous. But here are some of the points that i could think of (aside from the ethical one obviously): On one hand you would have to convince every woman on earth that men need to be eradicated. This is because men are not a separate genetic group from women. Unlike race, where the pressure from an outside group can drive a group to ext…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/21 09:58 PM
46

Yes exactly. I have heard many crazy radical feminists say this before. But a researcher at Harvard saying it is a completely different thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/21 06:42 PM
4

In short, it is necessary for the spread and success of feminism. Successful religious beliefs and ideologies have to be built on simply absolute assumptions. God doesn't have flaws and the devil doesn't have a small part of goodness in them. Communism is built on the idea of exploitative evil capitalism, and the utopic communitistic society. There is no place for realistic details or gray areas. Despite what the dicrionary definition says, the core beliefs of feminism (as an ideology) is Men ar…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 06:40 PM
44

What is interesting is that he was also asked:"doesn't humanity lose anything by losing males"?, he said:" i don't think there is anything that males do that females can't do". So, he can easily accepts that males are inherently more violent. But anything that men appear to be better at is because women did't get the opportunity to do. Which is a weird middle place to be in. In-between "men and women are completely equal" and "men and women are different and good in their own ways".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/21 05:59 PM
55

I don't think he was. If you watch the entire episode, it is clear that he means that. He just thinks that this is unrealistic right now. But if it could be done, it would be a very good thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/21 05:52 PM
9

Keep in mind in Kenya boys get circumcised at 14, not as babies, so they feel pain Babies also feel the same pain, it is just easier to hold them down. Just something to think about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/21 09:49 AM
7

-"I once prayed for god to help me in my exam, and he really did! I did very well in it!" -" well, when I used to pray nothing happened. I don't think god exists" -" no, it just means god is testing your faith". This basically the problem with beliefs. You can twist any fact to support them, because by definition, you start your analysis from them. Any different treatment for men and women can be interpreted as sexism against women, if you want to. Even bias for women can be interpreted as "seei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 09:13 PM
121

Naming a subreddit "Left wing..." would be a shitty way to attract right wingers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 07:52 PM
31

I wasn't exactly an average feminist, and i didn't call my self that( i didn't know it existed) but i did think that men's problems are insignificant compared to women's and that women are oppressed. In fact, i didn't actually think about the possibility of men having problems. The idea of men having exclusive problems was very unintuitive given the social roles of men and how we are taught to act. Like for me, it seemed intuitively wrong the idea that a woman should have restricted education an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/21 08:12 PM
2

Spreading ideas and awareness about men's issues is in its self a very important thing to do. And for many people, the most effective way to contribute. Actually, in my opinion, with issues that few people know or care about, the most effective thing you can do is change that. If you can do more, donate or be activist, that's great. But this doesn't mean that people who only talk are complacent or their actions don't matter, and they shouldn't be shamed about it. Simply living your principles an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/21 07:26 PM
1

Of course, i quoted that part to show how ridiculous the model is. They are basically saying violence against men is ok. Thanks for putting a reference btw, these kind of studies are useful when talking to people of different views.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/21 09:30 PM
3

You can't tell if you do or not, because most of the typical problems are subjective. Like reduced sensitivity. You will still feel that your level of sensitivity is normal. The only way to tell would be if you got "cut" as an adult. I am "cut" too. And maybe you don't mind the risks of this thing. Maybe you don't find its problems that important to you. The point is to realise that not everyone would feel this way. So you shouldn't make this permenante choice to a baby that may feel differently…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:36 AM
3

If you really think it is a normal operation, i really recommend you watch one. I think there are videos on YouTube.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:26 AM
6

They don't actually use anesthesia.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 10:51 PM
4

Its like saying, i don't have anything to say now, so there should be no freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 10:49 PM
11

Its about you having the choice to make this decision on your own. If you want to get circumcised, by all means. But don't do it to nonconsenting babies.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 10:46 PM
2

It is always fun to parse through social science "papers". Aside from obviouse ill-defined terms, i would say the main problem is Inaccurate representation of their results. The question states what is the likelihood of forcing a woman to do something sexual that she didn't want to do. They presented the results in the form of:"would you force a woman to sexual intercorse". Which is extremely different. The precieved meaning: First, "do something she didn't want to do", could mean anything from …
/r/MensRights23/08/21 02:53 PM
2

Yes, now it is working. It is a very detailed report. Thank you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/21 11:20 AM
1

The link shows: "page not found". I am aware of some of the problems with VAWA. But i was specifically talking about the arrest issue that i mentioned in the post. Considering the name of that act, i expected to find some law along the lines of " if a woman claims being the victim of violende, the man must be arrested". But surprisengly, the laws in VAWA are not gender specific on this issue. Another comment on the post answered this by pointing to the training guides of police, where the gender…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 12:45 PM
5

Yes i have read about it. It is a horrible view on the subject. This is from their site: "When women use violence in an intimate relationship, the circumstances of that violence tend to differ from when men use violence. Men’s use of violence against women is learned and reinforced through many social, cultural and institutional experiences. Women’s use of violence does not have the same kind of societal support. Many women who do use violence against their male partners are being battered. Thei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 08:38 AM
3

I am sorry that you went through that. Unfortunately, i am seeing this kind of stories very often on this site.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 08:31 AM
1

That is what i thought at first. But after my search, apparently, the VAWA laws are not explicitly gendered. So i guessed it might be more in the policies rather than the laws.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 08:13 AM
2

Thank you for the detailed and well referenced information. This is exactly what i was looking for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 08:10 AM
1

Most people are good with benevolent intentions. But Not egalitarians. As evidenced by the biases and sexism that this sub points to in feminism and society in general. The problem is that people are lazy. They first identify as feminists because they think it is the only option if you beleive in equality. Then, they stop questioning what they hear. People hear feminism, patriarchy, misogyny, toxic masculinity, mandplaining, manspreading, manterrupting, girl power wife beating. This leads to a b…
/r/MensRights28/03/20 10:35 PM
15

When women are oppressed by society, it's misogyny. When men are opressed by society it's toxic masculinity. This language is designed to imply that women's opression is the fault of others while men's opression is their Own fault.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 09:55 AM
7

It is rape. I don't think you will find opposition on this one outside conservatives and radical feminists. Fortunatly alot of people now recognize this as rape. Try to post this in any other relationships sub and see for your self.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 09:38 AM
1

Can someone explain this to me ? I understand that fathers are forced to pay child support as a fraction of their income. But if a man was not getting enough money( fired and not working , new job doesn't pay enough). Will still go to jail?
/r/MensRights26/03/20 10:31 PM
3

You do realize people don't pick what they are right? So preceiving being a woman is hard doesn't mean it's hypocritical to transition.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 10:12 PM
2

Lets say that wars are not common now and the average man should not fear being forced into them. That doesn't mean this issue is not relevent. How would feel about a law that says in the case of population falling under 50% of its current value, women would be forced by the government to rent their wombs go men selected by said government, to increase the population. And that women would have to sign when they get 18 that they agree to that. Population falling isn't that relevant now.But can yo…
/r/MensRights26/03/20 07:11 PM
29

I don't think fucking up facing the corona virus is specific to women or feminist leaders. Many other countries also didn't handle it well.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 09:50 PM
2

I don't think corporations and media stations really care about these things. This just reflects what people think. If people start caring about men and their problems, corporation would be motivated by profit to show that they care.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 11:49 AM
5

This is the first time that I've seen this. I've always thought that the earning is 0.77 for each 1 per hour. And that the wage gap is the result of different career choices and positions!
/r/MensRights05/03/20 04:00 PM
15

Weirdly enough, it is used even when there is an option to retreat. Usually the fear of the man going after the woman even if she left and the fear of his retaliation is used to justify what would be, otherwise, considered premeditated murder. Like killing a man while he is asleep.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 11:17 AM
1

Sadly, i think we need women to make the case and defend men's rights publically. People just wouldn't care to listen to men "whine" about their problems. I think cassie jaye caused more damage to feminism than any male MRA could.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 11:12 AM
5

But also because people don't learn about MRA. The only thing they know about it is the biased view from the mainstream media. Where it is portrayed as a sexist racist group. I learned about it from the red bill movie. What i think should happen are things simillar to that movie. Ways with which the true message of equallity is presented to the world. And I think alot of people would care, if it is presented in the correct way.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 10:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter