TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

johngoodman_69 Archive

View 3 posts and 3,417 comments by johngoodman_69 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,417 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

In general reddit when a posts complains about certain behaviors women have in relationships you'll see a lot of dudes say something along the lines of Good ol' "wife bad" or "boomer humor". Meanwhile there are whole groups of posts or subreddits that can be categorized as "husband bad" that don't get this reaction. Same thing when a dude says an actress or model is mid. Lots of replies of "what getting absolutely no pussy will do to a person". Just something I think about when some ppd women sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:38 PM
3

People don't understand that relationship experience and milestones are a thing. One small example when you're young and in your first relationships waking up in the morning with your SO in the same bed is a special thing, its one of those little milestones in relationships in youth. For most people the newness of experiencing that is over with by the time they are in their 20's. But if you are in your late 20's or early 30's and never experienced that and to you're partner its old news you can'…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:33 PM
2

So you offered 2 alternatives, one of them being to tell men to be gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 10:50 PM
0

It was this. Wild you're acting like you don't know. But we know women do care about these things. So why didn't the same standard hold?. But you didn't want to engage with it because we know that while these are important things for women to have in a job, the amount of jobs in the US that offer these benefits are very few and far between and thus there's fierce competition for them. Does that mean women just go without jobs if they can't get a job with these benefits? No, they take the best th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 10:46 PM
-1

Don't know why you think I want to lick the boots of capitalism, never said anything of the sort. Just usual attempt to resort to personal attacks instead of engaging with the point made. And yes, some of us won't even apply for jobs that don't have sick time, pto, or parental leave. np.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1u6l0n3/peter_help_me/ortatlb/ - this comment is becoming evergreen.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 08:03 PM
1

Guess who is included in humans. Unless women don't care about all this. And why should women suddenly care about what men do? But we know women do care about these things. So why didn't the same standard hold?. But you didn't want to engage with it because we know that while these are important things for women to have in a job, the amount of jobs in the US that offer these benefits are very few and far between and thus there's fierce competition for them. Does that mean women just go without j…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:45 PM
1

See women do understand sexual signaling and self sexualization. And they do understand they have some control over the amount of sexual attention they receive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:07 PM
-2

Women should really talk with each other if they're upset for taking jobs that don't offer paid maternity leave, 4 weeks of PTO, and unlimited sick time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:04 PM
3

The fact OP tripled down...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:03 PM
3

Don't be glib. What possible purpose could you have or what point could you be trying to make by directing men who are attracted to women towards a dating app known mainly for gay men?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 07:02 PM
–

Its funny because OP loves to say "Women are not gonna start acting like men" or " women dont think or behave like men". So when OP suggests men go to grindr they're assuming men are flexible in their sexuality like women are. Not only are hetero men more rigid in their sexuality but to keep suggesting to hetero men to "go on grindr" is casual erasure of gay and bi men's sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/26 01:54 PM
0

I can understand picking up a topic or conversation again due to life. But to specifically reply again saying how untriggered you are after its been a day I mean talk about telling on yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 07:42 PM
1

Dems are handling it better than Repubs have.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 06:13 PM
2

Every universal healthcare country I'm aware of has better health outcomes and the users pay less comparatively.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 06:12 PM
2

You ever have someone in PPD respond back to a comment chain after its been quiet for a day to tell you they aren't triggered? They just might reply to this as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 06:10 PM
0

my brother in christ you picked up the comment thread again from A DAY AGO.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 06:06 PM
1

LMAO not the gifs! This is great.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 05:16 PM
1

What's not working again? And you want me to talk about feelings now? haha
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 05:14 PM
–

Yes men who say this are displaying an absolutely L take.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 05:12 PM
1

Yeah man you got any more stories? I got time to kill.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 05:10 PM
2

Why would I engage when I already explained the video shows You're asking me why you would engage while you're continuing to... engage? Why would I watch a 30 minute video from someone who can't explain or articulate their own feelings or line of reasoning? Why would it have an affect when I literally showed that it can’t once exposed. Lol we're seeing it having "an affect" in real time! bruh you're like 10+ replies deep with me because I said larp. This is biggest "i'm not mad!" i've seen in a …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 05:09 PM
1

It’s hilarious. Fully agreed. This has been full of laughs. What you have still not been able to do- actually show anything anywhere that negates my real life. Nah man I was totally asking you to further share about your "real life". I like to read fiction as much as the next person so by all means continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 05:06 PM
1

You can't explain how you feel what I'm doing is DARVO. But instead insist I watch a 30 minute video? If you can't explain your feelings or defend what you're saying just admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 05:03 PM
1

The video didn't accuse me of using DARVO, you did. Are you capable of explaining how this is DARVO?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:56 PM
1

Telling on ones self. But you really are. Look how many comments deep you've gone responding to a throwaway comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:55 PM
0

Explain to me how this is DARVO. I'm really curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:52 PM
1

when they get triggered. LMAO who's triggered here?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:42 PM
1

are you ok? you're starting to spiral here bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:33 PM
1

A link to a cope song? Don't like getting called out on your larping I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:29 PM
–

As one of the most compulsively online posters here you really should stop passing off other people's lives or your fantasies as if they really happened. We can all see right through it. But by all means keep it going.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:19 PM
–

Go on….. No by all means continue with your little story
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:11 PM
–

haha we all know you haven't been with 20+ women unless you're constantly paying for escorts and prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 04:08 PM
–

lol what a larp Edit: I have initiated one of the best PPD meltdowns I've seen in a long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 03:49 PM
–

np.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1u6l0n3/peter_help_me/ortatlb/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 03:48 PM
3

I just said women either take it or leave it. Which is not an answer to the question I asked. I can’t be a hypocrite if I’m being consistent. But you're not being consistent. For women's behavior the reasoning is women don't think or behave like men and men should get over. But when asked where does this reasoning stop for men's behavior you won't engage with the idea or topic, implicitly admitting you only apply this standard for women. That's not consistency.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 03:42 PM
6

Now we all know you're a hypocrite with the standards you judge women's or men's behavior and we get to see it illustrated in a blatant fashion. I asked you a specific question (twice) and each time your response is to a different subject. I'm not following your attempts to derail the line of questioning to a different subject or response.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 03:05 PM
4

Whatever your response is supposedly addressing is not what I asked. Do you want to try again or are you admitting you only apply this standard to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 02:53 PM
–

Or how some of the more effective areas of rhetoric are straight up not allowed to be discussed.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 02:46 PM
5

Where's the outer boundary of applying this reasoning to men's behavior that women complain about?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 02:45 PM
12

This is certainly a reply of all time. For the rest of the audience I'll explain why this is a take. Hetero women are shown to be much more flexible and fluid in their sexuality and who they are attracted to. Where as hetero men are much more rigid in who they are attracted to and much more likely to only be attracted to women. Thus hetero men don't appreciate male sexual attention because hetero men aren't attracted to men. In theory, hetero women should be attracted to men. Thus making the com…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 01:48 PM
1

may i suggest supplementing your caffeine intake with pharmaceutical grade amphetamine (as prescribed by your doctor)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 05:02 AM
2

The male urge to shame other men for wanting lower gears on their bicycle.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:22 PM
–

We could also see how much of larp some of the most terminally online posters are here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:10 PM
–

The discussion around n counts is really a discussion of women's sex losing its value and thus women losing privilege. When women experience their sexual access lose value begin approaching that of men's that loss of privilege causes quite a few issues for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:07 PM
–

The projection is so powerful is should be called imax.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:04 PM
–

Reasonable take. This might interest you. This same idea was looked at from an academic take: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582858/ https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71503.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:03 PM
1

What happened to your argument that women just lie when someone post the same meta analysis I did as one of the top replies?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:42 PM
1

I don't know. I still think getting used for sex is much worse - especially if it involves a position as vulnerable as being penetrated. It's like theft vs rape for me This idea of "used" for sex is comes with the implied idea that you're "owed" something for engaging in sex. You're no more owed anything than a person who pays for their date's meal, tickets, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:40 PM
2

But I was told women just lie. So self reporting. Nah. Women just lie. This is well established. If you don’t realize how horny women are it’s either because you are around conservative women or you aren’t sexually very appealing. Women have very high standards regarding looks. We also want to fuck strangers. I’ll counter with this: The male replies were about the same under each of the three conditions, but for the females the circumstances were crucial. Many women in the first group said they'…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 07:34 PM
–

gay age gap discussions and straight age gap discussions are worlds apart. gay men dating culture is worlds apart from hetero culture in most ways
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 06:23 AM
2

Damn I didn’t expect you to come for women like that but I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 08:31 PM
2

It’s funny how the same attitude and behavior changes from “nasty” to something positive if the man is attractive enough. The same behavior gets interpreted differently based on the attractiveness of the individual. So the “it’s your personality bro” paints an incomplete picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 08:27 PM
2

Fathers are hypocrites.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 08:23 PM
0

This response goes on the ppd bingo card too. If people pay attention this stuff starts really young. It's wild and I don't like it. https://np.reddit.com/r/topofreddit/comments/1u59ylh/boys_swim_trunks_vs_girl_swimming_bottoms/(post got removed because of course) https://np.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/1dy8v8c/didnt_think_girl_or_boy_shorts_mattered_for/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 12:02 PM
0

So unbothered that has to get the last word in. I'm done. See ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 01:44 AM
0

This is boring, you're dumb, I'm out. See ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 01:43 AM
0

Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 01:40 AM
0

That you're completely not bothered at all. See how unbothered you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 01:40 AM
1

dunning-kruger in full effect
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 01:38 AM
2

Minority that consist of males. Not female minorities for a reason. Nah conservatives just lump them all together, they don't exclude women minorities from their prejudice. Not awkward but acknowledging that males can be violent. Replace males with <insert minority> and yeah, that sounds like them. Same rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 12:08 AM
3

So that 5% can be responsible for making it worse for the other 95% This is what conservatives say about minorities. awkward.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 12:04 AM
4

So first dude asked him to open up about something. Dude expressed a vulnerability about it. The first guy completely disregards it, says he doesn't care. We don't think that's going to put someone in a certain headspace being treated like that? If a woman opened up about something she was vulnerable about and someone responds with "I don't care" I wouldn't expect her to be on her best behavior when guys show up to and start playing in the same space she just admitted she was vulnerable about an…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 12:04 AM
1

"I didn't do that, I did this" Yeah man. its obvious you don't care at all. doesn't bother you a bit. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:57 PM
0

So did you just admit hypergamy might not be the only driving factor?! Well then the whole idea that it is which was OPs argument is negated. Maybe according to an idiot. But only an absolute imbecile would think that. Hypergamy was discussed as one of the major driving causes. The fact that there are other driving causes doesn't negate what OP argues or what I was arguing. That's just a sad attempt at reaching there. Now I kinda feel bad for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:55 PM
1

and i repeated your actions. Taking issue isn’t that. Sure seems like you took issue to it to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:52 PM
1

that's not how they're using "could be" but like i said, keep fucking that chicken. No one made the argument that hypergamy was the only driving factor, but its definitely a major driving factor. but keep quoting "could be" out of context.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:51 PM
1

Me: interprets the quote in the same manner as /u/lift_and_lurk /u/lift_and_lurk takes issue and continues to respond.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:48 PM
1

lol keep fucking that chicken buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:46 PM
1

Oh no... are you getting upset that someone is misinterpreting a quote? If it has all the makings it must be! Don't get mad now that someone is drawing an incorrect conclusion from a quote out of context.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:45 PM
1

You: I have a paper that mentions hypergamy! Me: but that’s not what the paper is actually about Yes this is correct... The paper is about "Solving the fertility crisis could require a further marginalization of men" and one of the driving reasons behind that fertility crisis is... HYPERGAMY. This still makes your argument wrong which is why the laughter is ensuing because you're too stupid to grasp that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:43 PM
1

Nah man that out of context quote that I'm definitely not purposely misinterpreting means that it is "a big boy science".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:39 PM
1

Here I'm going to pull a /u/lift_and_lurk. I'm going to pull a small snippet of the material out of context, misinterpret it, and use that to say the material supports an argument it actually doesn't. "evolutionary psychology has all the makings of a real science with testable hypothesis" It's the /u/lift_and_lurk way!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:28 PM
1

So its literally not about hypergamy its “at most” a could be reason for low birth rates. Nope, that's not an correct summation of the paper's arguments at all. Not even “statistically shown to be” Or the data points to Or “the evidence shows” Just could be. Again, completely incorrect interpretation of that paper's data. So here's what happened. You claimed that shit is only observed in social media. I show you that's it not and I predict, accurately, you would resort to all sort of stupid fuck…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:24 PM
1

Yeah that's the language that academic journals use as they tend to avoid absolutes. But the paper is definitely without a doubt point to hypergamy as one of the issues contributing to falling birth rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:17 PM
1

But will you? Will I "watch 15 seconds of it and form an opinion not supported by the content that I won't move from"? Nah. I have more integrity than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:14 PM
1

I quoted the part abstract that stated the solution which literally shows it’s not hypergamy. That's correct. The solution isn't hypergamy, they're pointing to that as one of the causes... The solution was state provided resources to women to raise kids on their own. Could. Be. Yeah that's the language that academic journals use as they tend to avoid absolutes. But the paper is definitely without a doubt point to hypergamy as one of the issues contributing to falling birth rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:13 PM
1

You quoted the part of the abstract that states the argument against while ignoring the rest of the abstract that addresses the argument as laid out.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:08 PM
1

So the STATE could provide more to women. Not their partners. Thats not hypergamy. Like at all. Yeah and the reason the state would need to do that would be to address falling birth rates due to women's hypergamy genius lol. But at least we've established that is discussed in more areas that just social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:05 PM
1

Lol you just skimmed and picked a part out of context yet again. Never change.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:03 PM
0

I should watch 15 seconds of it and form an opinion not supported by the content that I won't move from so I can be like you. I suspect that's exactly what you've done here already, that's very much your brand. What hilarious is your trying to make a dig at a paper that took 30 minutes to read by saying I should watch a 40 minute long youtube video. That's the level of intellect we're dealing with here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:00 PM
1

Could be was literally used as why they thought there was an issue from the quote you posted. So the academic paper seriously discusses hyergamy like I said. Again, I just had to show this was discuss more in social media. You won't touch that. Plus you seeing "evo psychology" as one of the keywords and deciding this whole paper is purely within the realm of evo psychology and try to use that as an excuse to hand wave it away is extremely on brand with you. Again, how are you this dumb bro? http…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:59 PM
0

You wouldn't understand it. You'd take a 5 second snippet out of context, misinterpret it, and frame a whole world-view around it
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:53 PM
1

It says “it could be” "Could be" was used in the context of a possible solution to the problem. Where as hypergamy is discussed as one of the forces causing the problem. I called you doing this before it happened lol Not that that matters to you because even when you're shown direct evidence you make the worst faith interpretations or outright illogical reasoning to deny whatever example conflicts with your world view. How are you this dumb? Just...how?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:49 PM
1

the original point to be proved is this is discussed more than in just "social media".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:42 PM
0

But can you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:41 PM
1

LOL look at you trying to drag this. Move them goal posts. You didn't even interpret the abstract correctly. You read like a sentence of it. And again. the original point to be proved is this is discussed more than in just "social media".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:39 PM
1

Not that that matters to you because even when you're shown direct evidence you make the worst faith interpretations or outright illogical reasoning to deny whatever example conflicts with your world view. You do this dumb shit every time bro and I call it before it even happens. Sure does look like hypergamy is discussed in the academics like I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:36 PM
0

So you made a stupid argument that turned out to be wrong because you just skimmed an abstract and now you're trying to cover your ass. Again, the original point to be proved is this is discussed more than in just "social media". And now you're moving the goalposts trying to hinge an argument on evo-psych funny how you tried to accuse me of that. Projection much? Great time management? You're one of the most prolific posters on ppd.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:34 PM
2

That's the same propaganda the Nazi's used to discriminate against the jews. That white supremacist use to discriminate against minorities. If someone of a group does something harmful to me that's not carte blanche to discriminate or judge the whole group. Its not ok with religious groups, its not ok with racial groups and its not ok against an entire sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:30 PM
1

Not that that matters to you because even when you're shown direct evidence you make the worst faith interpretations or outright illogical reasoning to deny whatever example conflicts with your world view. I'm asking you why it says the state may need to incentivize women to have babies so you'll be forced to read more and realize the paper clearly states its due to women's increase HYPERGAMY. It literally states this in the introduction but you just skimmed the abstract and its obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:27 PM
1

What was that about moving goal posts? Not that that matters to you because even when you're shown direct evidence you make the worst faith interpretations or outright illogical reasoning to deny whatever example conflicts with your world view.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:19 PM
0

the general range of male sexuality contains a lot more coercive; violative; and non-consensual elements than the general range of female sexuality. You just demonstrated what I was agreeing with the public discussions have tended to encourage female sexuality, while (strong) male sex drive has frequently been viewed more critically,
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:16 PM
1

Pretty sure the foolish person was the one that wasted thier time reading papers that literally state in their abstract that it’s about the state doing shit, not women marrying up. Why is the paper saying that states may need to do shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:12 PM
0

Next time actually read what is linked instead of skimming so you don't look so foolish my guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 09:42 PM
2

But "public discussions about sexuality" aren't going to explicitly be centered around edge cases That's not true. Many "edge cases" or a better term "specifics" of sexuality make up a great deal of public discussion of men and women's sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 09:41 PM
0

So tell me /u/lift_and_lurk why did the paper state that “nations could be to provide women with the economic and social resources necessary for them to conclude that having children alone makes for a better life than remaining childless” you didn't fully understand why it came to that conclusion because you didn't read the thing. If you had you would have seen further on: A more accurate framing could be that, as many men’s utility as long-term partners diminish, women increasingly shift from a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 09:39 PM
0

And exhibit A for your same routine is on display. I read the full article. You quickly skimmed to find a section you think supported your viewpoint. Way to tell on yourself bud. I love it when I call out your behavior before you do it and you still do it. Read like book. etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 09:22 PM
2

Ah another “I observe” which always means “do nothing but look at social media content” Nope. What OP is saying has been mirrored in academic papers on this. Not that that matters to you because even when you're shown direct evidence you make the worst faith interpretations or outright illogical reasoning to deny whatever example conflicts with your world view. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/toward-individualistic-reproduction-solving-the-fertility…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 09:12 PM
4

Women feel this way because they tend to be more turned on by other women's bodies than they do male bodies. That's why they have to bring up male homosexuality in an attempt to get us to see things from their perspective since their sexuality is more fluid than ours. It is well replicated in many studies that heterosexual women tend to be aroused and distracted equally by both sexes regardless of what their subjective arousal is (or generally a bit more in favor of females), being almost perfec…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 09:01 PM
1

I believe there are a range of behaviors around sexuality that men and women can engage in that when women perform these behaviors those actions will be more favorably received by men and women vs when men engage in those behaviors.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 08:55 PM
3

Men are unsafe for women. Before you go screaming “nOt AlL mEn!!!”, understand that we don’t know who is safe. I see we got a fan of 'Der Giftpilz' here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 08:51 PM
2

in recent decades the public discussions have tended to encourage female sexuality, while (strong) male sex drive has frequently been viewed more critically, pointing to the possibility that sexual double standards may be shifting, at least in western societies Yup. I've been noticing that too. Example A: the general range of male sexuality contains a lot more coercive; violative; and non-consensual elements than the general range of female sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 08:34 PM
1

You would think until they hand wave away two different meta-analysis about strength of sexual drive without reading them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 08:20 PM
1

a.) as i said, it won't really stop the cumulative sexualization that we experience in our lives and women will still be sexualized all the time without it in various ways That's really hard to say for certain because women sexualize themself constantly. It's very rare to see women out in public without them having done something to increase their sexualization compared to what men typically do. Either their clothes are tighter or cut to reveal more, they're wearing makeup, etc. etc. Compared to…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 07:58 PM
1

I have recently learned that's a nono word here in ppd.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 09:24 PM
1

Again. You've just self reported that you're making assertions you have no idea about because you haven't read the study
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:53 PM
1

That's the summary. Read the entire study.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:49 PM
1

You’re making my point that it doesn’t explain it Because you read through the study and saw this? Until you read what's been provided you don't know what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:47 PM
1

Quit asking me to do the work for you. Its in the study. READ IT. And you have no way to know if all 211 studies they examined were self reporting because again, you didn't read the study. or the first meta analysis either. At this point this is trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:42 PM
1

Its in the study why can't you read? I'm not here to chew your food for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:19 PM
3

Sorry. That shit doesnt work anymore. Birth control exists. Birth control may exist but /u/chamomilecloud is right.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 04:34 AM
–

saying girls apply themselves more. But when the effort is equal boys get graded worse. Teachers are more lenient in their marking of girls' schoolwork, according to an international study. An OECD report on gender in education, across more than 60 countries, found that girls receive higher marks compared with boys of the same ability.But it also reveals that teachers can be biased towards giving girls higher results than boys, even when they have produced the same quality of work. Same work but…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 04:30 AM
1

So you're admitting you didn't read the study you're hand waving away because the meta-analsys covers that. Way to tell on yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 04:08 AM
1

Methodological Nuance: When the data was statistically adjusted to account for potential "biased responding" (a tendency for men to overestimate and women to underestimate due to social desirability or reporting norms), the gender difference reduced but remained significant at g = 0.54 Adjustment for biased responding reduced the gender difference (g = 0.54). Moderation analyses suggest that the effect is robust and largely invariant to contextual factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 04:06 AM
1

Methodological Nuance: When the data was statistically adjusted to account for potential "biased responding" (a tendency for men to overestimate and women to underestimate due to social desirability or reporting norms), the gender difference reduced but remained significant at g = 0.54
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 04:06 AM
1

You keep hitting me with self reporting even after saying it’s not self reporting. I’ve shown women lie in self reporting and gave a link. The second meta-analysis I spoke about: Methodological Nuance: When the data was statistically adjusted to account for potential "biased responding" (a tendency for men to overestimate and women to underestimate due to social desirability or reporting norms), the gender difference reduced but remained significant at g = 0.54 That right there accounts for "wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 04:03 AM
1

So self reporting. So you didn't read either of the two meta-analysis or understand how they came to their conclusions MUCH LESS how the studies they examined were conducted. You just old on yourself. If you don’t realize how horny women are it’s either because you are around conservative women or you aren’t sexually very appealing. Women have very high standards regarding looks. Again, if women were as horny as men this wouldn't matter. There wouldn't be these caveats. Basically every time you …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:54 AM
1

Btw watching porn is popular among women. The majority of women watch porn regularly. I don’t know why men don’t get that when all studies show this. You just got done discounting a meta-analysis by hand waving it claiming its "self-reporting" (news alert that's not how meta-analysis work). So how do you think the results of porn usage among women work? Oh yeah self reporting. The pornography gap deepens extensively, however, when frequency of pornography use is examined—with casually dating men…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:51 AM
9

all benefit men disproportionately They do not. They benefit women disproportionately. That's why men are the one falling behind.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:53 AM
1

Also, you can't use the same terminology that you're asking for clarity on to ask for clarity for. Why not? In fact that makes the most sense to use their same language. "I've never seen X" "Can you give an example of what you would consider X"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:52 AM
1

I'm using the same word as the person I replied to originally. They used "concrete examples" so I'm using their same terminology.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:47 AM
7

Men failing to perform on an even playing field Is it really an even playing field at this point? If teachers give higher grades to girls for equal competence in school work. If more women than men are enrolled and graduating from college than men vs women in the 1970's and there are still more gendered scholarships going to women. It seems the playing field is tipped to favor women and has for some time.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:46 AM
0

If they had said "I've never heard any examples" that's one thing. But "concrete examples" implies that they want a certain standard of evidence. So what is an example of evidence that meets this standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 01:10 AM
1

and the many other young men who have felt shamed and blamed by the left, but I guess I've just never heard any concrete examples What's a concrete example for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 09:37 PM
2

What they heard from the left is: you don’t have problems, you are the problem. We're seeing this in action in this very post.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:34 PM
1

Can you link this study? Is this self reporting? Its Baumeister's meta-analysis of several dozen studies. It should be foundational reading for PPD. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_5 Note: before you make an argument regarding its age know that there's been a second meta-analysis done in 2022 with similar conclusion: In this article, we present a theory-driven conceptualization of sex drive as the density distribution of state sex drive, where state sex drive is de…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:45 PM
1

And there are gay men who watch straight and lesbian porn? You’re talking about outliers. We're talking about outliers. Thus using the existence of outliers to claim some generality exist is bad reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:40 PM
2

The topic is about the sexualization of women. "Women sexualize themselves" is indeed the definition of a whataboutism. Women's self sexualization is on-topic for a discussion of the sexualization of women. OP literally discusses women dressing more modestly. It's completely irrelevant to whether a man will sexualize a woman It isn't. This is you denying reality. I'm not saying its the absolute end all or be all but it does have an effect in the amount of sexual attention women receive. There ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:38 PM
1

I wasn't bringing up "gay men's interactions with straight men," I was bringing up gay men's interactions with gay men 🥴 TBF you just said men. Men includes straight men. If you had said "gay men sexualize other gay men" then yeah, so yes bingo for me. You keep talking about sexualization like it's inextricably linked to what people wear. It's not. I haven't argued that. I'm arguing that it DOES have an effect and that is what keeps being denied. Gay men don't fuck based on clothes, they fuck ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 04:17 PM
1

this is one video of a woman wearing a burka. Yes and like I said at the start I'm not advocating that women should have to resort to that. But it shows that dressing modestly does an effect. And the second video showed that when an attractive man wore a similar tight fitting shirt he also got sexual attention similar to the woman in the first video showing that sexual signaling works for both men and women. But again there's been numerous experiments done by academics that show the relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 03:15 PM
2

I wonder what he's say if you asked him if gay men sexualize other men less based on what they're wearing 🙄 PPD women bringing up gay men's interactions with (straight) men when ever this is discussed would go on the ppd bingo card as well. But to answer your question, yes they would sexualize men more or less depending on what they're wearing. Gay men literally had and may still have a clothing based system to signal to other gay men to let them know they're open for hookups and what they're in…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 02:03 PM
1

it will not reduce to any real degree the amount of sexual attention you get from men in general when you're a woman. But the video literally shows that it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:59 PM
1

If a man watches lesbian porn and one reason is because he doesn’t want to compare his dick to porn star’s huge dicks that doesn’t mean he’s not into watching the women. Because he's attracted to women. One of the women who admitted to watching gay porn is literally a lesbian which means she's not attracted to men. And to look at the big picture here, watching porn isn't that popular amongst women as a whole in general. so slicing off this little section of women who watch man on man porn to mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 12:02 AM
1

I want to make it clear that I'm not advocating or saying women need to wear religious garments like a hijab or nun habit to be left alone. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgw6y3cH7tA Can we see the difference in attention this woman got? And for comparison. We have an attractive man walking around a very similar outfit and notice how he experiences some of the same sort of attention https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75aX9mlipiY but you agree that men can and will often sexualize even a modestly d…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 11:54 PM
1

Women desire desirable men a great deal. "a great deal" for a woman. We desire fewer men is the difference. Because your desire towards men is less. Women go feral for actually sexually attractive men. "feral" lolol sure. Women's desire towards men is nothing compared to men's desire towards women. The fact you keep mentioning these caveats for women's desire proves the point as if women aren't just as overweight as men. The sex drive refers to the strength of sexual motivation. Across many diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 11:43 PM
2

What would you call your complete lack of acknowledgement Acknowledgement of what exactly? subsequent whataboutism here That wasn't a whataboutism. it's about the idea that the way a woman dresses makes a man think about her sexually. That's literally sexual signaling. That's going to happen regardless. But its affected by the sexual signaling a woman employs. No, you've just never actually been on topic. I have. Work on your reading comprehension and critical analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 10:33 PM
2

I did not deny that. Women sexualizing themselves isn't what causes men to sexualize us. I denied the idea that women sexualizing themselves has no effect on men's perception of women's sexual signaling, sexual availability etc. In your urge to be hyperbolic and strip nuance you're denying how we work as humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 09:48 PM
3

Feel free to deny reality and biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 08:59 PM
–

False
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 08:45 PM
5

I really should make a PPD bingo card. Any acknowledgement of women's agency over their sexuality or their ability to engage (or not) in sexual signaling and like clockwork some variation of the above are always the goto.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 08:26 PM
4

Women can and do sexualize themself. Women know how to and do perform explicit actions to increase or decrease the amount of sexual attention they receive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 08:09 PM
3

Women desire men plenty "Plenty". The point is the relativity. I'm making a generality but most men will never feel being desired like they feel desire in hetero interactions. A hot guy who won’t fuck fat chicks and has higher standards than an ugly guy doesn’t desire women less. He just has higher standards because he can. In every way academics and scientist have come up with to measure desire in sort of quantifiable external action men show (generally speaking) the stronger drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 08:07 PM
1

So you’re cherry picking a bit. I'm highlighting the parts of the article that support my point without quoting the entire source as its there in the link. Did you give a full rundown of all the reasons women consume gay porn in the interaction you referenced or just the aspect that supported the point you were making? Alright then.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 07:58 PM
2

Lets go back to your original point: Well my favorite interaction was when I asked one of them “how do you explain how popular watching gay porn is with straight women” As the women themselves state there's a myriad of reasons. Women watching gay porn in not as analogous as men watching lesbian porn and it doesn't really disprove men's point there a major asymmetry in level of attraction women feel towards men in general compared to vice versa. Its not to say women aren't attracted to men at all…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 07:56 PM
3

Well with these type of conversations the posters are almost always the exception. There's so much research, evidence, anecdotes, etc. that there are major asymmetries to how much men desire women (or find attractive) vs how much women desire men (or find them attractive).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 01:46 PM
3

You know I hadn't thought about this. I went to see why DO women watch gay male porn? https://www.vice.com/en/article/women-tell-us-why-they-prefer-porn-with-no-women/ LOU 26 I first found myself moving away from lesbian porn because it felt very male-gazey. I am very queer and feel like queer male sex is some of the queerest porn available because there are more genuinely queer male performers than female in the industry. Seeing immaculately manicured women performing queer sex, visibly not enj…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 01:42 PM
2

I want to be wanted, I want to be someone that you can't live without, not out of convenience or a last resort, if it's not that then women do not want it! You think men are any different? Who's more likely to feel this level of being desired in a hetero relationship? Its not the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 02:12 AM
1

calm down, no need to get so emotional. I'm offering a different viewpoint. i pointed out the issues with being named after our fathers and how being named after our mothers would address those issues based on real life examples. there would still be some exceptions but there would be less.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/26 02:51 PM
1

And in our current system, each person is (theoretically) named after the man that sired them. So you wouldn't have people with last names of people that have no blood relation to them. If the mother knows who the father is. In my case some of the guys aren't sure who their real dad is. Maury made a whole tv show out of it. So i refer back to my original point. Maternity is much less of a question than paternity. You think children are not blood related to their fathers? Yes of course they are. …
/r/EverydayMisandry22/04/26 01:34 AM
-1

It would not be the same. Each person would be named after the woman that gave birth to them. So you wouldn't have people with last names of people that have no blood relation to them.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/26 05:12 PM
-2

It does show one of the pitfalls of taking our "father's" last name. I'm here to rail against misandry as much as anyone and the quote in the OP reeks of misandry. But the idea of us taking our mother's name is not a bad idea.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 12:42 PM
-4

I added to my original comment to address this here.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 12:41 AM
-12

I'm not against us taking our mother's last name, we all come from our mom. Maternity is much less of a question than paternity. edit: I'll give you a real life example I deal with. I have a not so common last name from my dad. So does my brother. But we have different moms. Now when my brother's mom separated from my dad she had a bunch of kids by different men but gave them my dad's last name. And in the years these kids have had kids. Now there's whole group of people with my dad's last name …
/r/EverydayMisandry19/04/26 09:55 PM
–

Here's an example of women denying their privilege and trying to turn it into a sort of vicitmhood that plays out time and time again on reddit and especially here in PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 12:53 AM
0

I... can't find fault with this. Good Luck and congrats!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 11:07 AM
1

arguing with me every time I tell them my plans. I want in on this. What are you're plans?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 11:00 AM
3

Tbh I’m not really that attracted to him but honestly I’m more so just looking to fucking go out and make friends. He’s also has a nice personality so that’s a huge plus since me and the girls just care about nice personality. When women complain about a man dating a woman he's not really interested in just to get sex instead of really being interested in something long term this is a counter example of a man dealing with it. Not saying you're trying to get sex out of the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:58 AM
0

I don't know why people argue women don't initiate. For the most part they don't. Your friend experienced the exception. Lets hope she doesn't have BPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:54 AM
3

But i don't see the point. It's not that you don't see the point. Its that you can't. You can't do it because you know I didn't do that either. i don't enjoy fighting by any means to be seen as "right", so if you want to win this race to the bottom be my guest, i prefer to stay on civilized level. This is practically DARVO at this point. I haven't misrepresented anything you said. My comment deals directly with the points you made in the comment I replied to. So if I haven't misrepresented the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:50 AM
1

I can also edit so whatever you say would be taken out of context and look stupid. Then do it. I fleshed out my point. I didn't substantially change my argument. I don't think you can change your posts in such a way that what I'm saying will look stupid. But by all means give it a shot and lets see.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:30 AM
2

Its telling you have to resort to an exaggerated strawman in order to attempt to make your comparison work. If you had several hundred matched, but they were from let's say fat women, who will buy you a coffee take you on a date and pay for it, but then will use you for have sex with you, meaning they will just sit on your face, engage in intercourse and leave when they came you're both done, it is hardly something to feel good about. That's closer to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:24 AM
4

And you're proving my point. You deny your privilege in this aspect of society and still claim to be a victim despite your advantages. I assume that means you didn't want to debate with me Well we know what they say when you assume. so i remove everything i've said Because it was making you look foolish. I understand though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:48 AM
5

Right and part of them impressing females is their more ornamental looks. So the idea that women are meant to be the more beautiful gender I can't see it supported anywhere. Its more of an exception and weird quirk of humans. With the look maxxing trend happening around young men this may in fact change in the next 50 years IF society hold stable enough given the oncoming climate catastrophe.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:37 AM
9

That's not a privilege, that is simply some advantages in dating that men don't have. To be called privileged those advantages have to outweigh disadvantages that women have, and imo they don't. When I do a quick search to refresh myself on the meaning of privilege in a social aspect no definition of privilege has mentioned it has to outweigh disadvantages. This is yet another example of women contorting themselves to deny the privilege they have in this aspect of life and chasing victimhood. Pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:35 AM
11

Women are meant to be the more beautiful gender. See this is interesting to me. Typically it the male of a species that is more ornamental, colorful, etc. than the female in order to attract a mate. Its weird this is flipped in humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:29 AM
4

males, do you have any other strategy that women can use to filter out men who are only looking for sex? Women can pay for the dates, arrange them, etc until they're ready to have sex then we can take over.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:20 PM
1

Here's an article that deals with exactly this topic with some numbers to back it up. You all can decide on how "overblown" it is based on the data: https://fortune.com/2026/03/28/men-home-women-workforce-economics-gender-change/
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:08 PM
7

but never seem to give a shit about the actual violence bi men experience from other men. Do men or women really give a shit about the actual violence men experience from other men? Put it this way. When women talk about how they're victims of violence go ahead and bring up how much men are victims of violence as well and let us know about all the empathy you get.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:50 PM
9

Similar logic to misandry hurts feelings misogyny kills line that is used. People will talk all day long about how misogyny and online hate of women is bad but when you bring up the equivalent towards men that argument reads as "Sexism based hate is ok as long as no assault". smh
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 12:46 PM
0

One major reason for women is relationship duration.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 01:25 AM
3

Thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 06:11 PM
7

In my experience growing up it was super romantic for first loves to lose their virginity to one another. i guess that falls under a "moral thing"? But yes I agree virgin women typically prefer virgin men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:04 PM
1

Shaming men for not wanting non virgin women is wrong, it's their body their choice. Unless the man is also a virgin. Otherwise shame men all day for wanting virgin women if they're not also virgins. Its hypocritical and shows major insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:02 PM
1

Definitely a major part of it with the evidence being how much women bitch about "being used for sex" or men bailing on the relationship after getting some. By that point there's enough trust established where the woman is willing to sleep with the guy. But they're pissed because they though the guy would stick around afterwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:57 PM
1

But commitment is part of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:48 PM
6

Have you seen this from Martin Fiebert? Abstract : This annotated bibliography describes 343 scholarly investigations (270 empirical studies and 73 reviews) demonstrating that women are as physically aggressive as men (or more) in their relationships with their spouses or opposite-sex partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 440,850 people. Source
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:47 PM
3

If anyone gives you shit about your sources Martin Fiebert is also a good source of research: Abstract : This annotated bibliography describes 343 scholarly investigations (270 empirical studies and 73 reviews) demonstrating that women are as physically aggressive as men (or more) in their relationships with their spouses or opposite-sex partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 440,850 people. Source
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:45 PM
4

Thats IPV, intimate partner violence, in that study. DV, domestic violence, can include violence between siblings and between parents and children. I'm pointing out the distinction between DV stats can be different than IPV stats due to including a wider range of relationships. I don't really give a shit about siblings duking it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:25 PM
5

I've actually lived this. It fucking sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:24 PM
–

If it makes you feel better you can grow a whole ass person inside of you and your sexual chromosomes undergo spell check meanwhile the Y sex chromosome is getting more jank as the generations go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:16 PM
1

Trust "fully" established? to some extent that never happens. Again, its commitment. That's why women bitch about being "used" for sex because their expectation for commitment wasn't met. You can even include trust in there because the woman's trust in the man was betrayed because she felt he was going to stick around longer than just getting sex and then dipping out.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:12 PM
1

But if commitment isn’t being traded for sex than it shouldn’t matter if the dude wants to bail after he hits. Or having sex shouldn’t wait until commitment is secured. Glad we settled that sex and commitment are interlinked in LTR’s and one is used to secure the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:54 PM
–

Definitely a lot of them would. I think more of them would be willing to do it if they knew the taller woman they were dating wouldn’t fuck with them about being short. Personally I did but I'm not short. I'm 5' 9" and the last girl I dated was 5' 11.75". She was very specific about the 3/4 because she didn't want to be 6 ft tall, it made her feel less feminine. I was thrilled to be dating my tall gf but that's just me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:30 PM
1

Why do you need to wait to have sex until you been with them in a serious relationship for a while? According to you either the person wants sex or doesn't want sex and that desire is completely decoupled from commitment. But yes, that's why women wait to have sex with someone until they've been in a serious relationship for a while. To make sure they get commitment before having sex. That's the trade.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:26 PM
–

Its an analogy. But even with your analysis of it a person with enough money can hire out the upkeep and management of the properties. I agree it takes a ton of work to own a property for a person of regular means.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:24 PM
1

Women get upset when men date them until the point they have sex and then stop dating them. Women talk all the time about filtering out men who they think will do this. So yes, women absolutely trade sex for commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:00 PM
–

Gotta go harder to overcome the writer's block. Mix with alcohol to lower inhibition to really get the words flowing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 12:59 PM
–

Being short is definitely a hindrance to being considered attractive for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 12:58 PM
–

Try some stimulants for inspiration and then the words may flow.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 12:49 PM
1

Why is it supposed to be mutual? That doesn't happen unless there is something there to motivate each person to include their partner's interest along with their own self interest. If a relationship is supposed to go both ways then there has to be something to motivate taking care or catering to the other person. Call it owing the other person, call it obligation to your partner, whatever. But the idea a relationship goes both ways or is mutual has to rest upon something that drives each person …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 12:48 PM
1

Why does a relationship go both ways if neither party "owes" anyone anything? This argument hinges on the word "owe" but in reality very few relationships survive or are healthy if they're too one-sided. Whatever word is used to describe that reciprocation its an important foundation of most interpersonal relationships, social, romantic, etc. Therefore giving back to the other person is part of maintaining the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:38 AM
–

The girl responding still need to be hot Not hot, just attractive. And that's a much easier hurdle for women to clear vs men. Most women experience some form of pretty privilege or benevolent sexism pretty frequently. Its only a small subset of women who truly rarely experience and its bummer to read how bad it messes them up but its also pretty validating at the same time. You get to see when women are stripped of their privilege in this part of reality they start to express a lot of the same t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 08:39 AM
–

Like I genuinely don’t understand the thought process here, It carries the same energy as a millionaire lecturing their family member about buying a fixxer upper property in a bad neighborhood to live in and then in another post bragging about buying another property to add their rental portfolio. Seriously I find explaining these things in terms of economic inequality is the only way to reach some of you because that's experienced by more of us regardless of sex or gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 08:35 AM
–

My money is on ‘reactive abuse’. Having just learned this is a phrase they use boy am I gonna have explaining the results of that popular reciprocal vs nonreciprocal intimate partner violence study.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 08:31 AM
–

men don't care about niceness ackchyually men tend to find responsiveness in a partner as more attractive versus women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 08:30 AM
6

If we want to talk about the amount of violence experience from their intimate partners lets also talk about the amount of violence women commit against their intimate partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 08:14 AM
0

I've seen women advise other women on what to do to their partners in these situations to get their man to come around. If women experienced that behavior they would call it bullying.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:20 PM
6

Don't try and pressure and coerce a woman into sex acts she doesn't want to do. You guys see how women react when their man stops going down on them?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 12:20 PM
4

Goodluck with that. You already have women who don’t care about this issue. I HIGHLY doubt a societal push toward women being responsible for dates and wooing men is going to result in anything more than more women landing on “who needs them” No doubt because the same group of women who push for change to make society more equitable and equal take on the mentality of conservative billionaires when it comes to acknowledging their privilege in dating much less taking any action to address it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 12:15 PM
8

Promising emotional availability and then withdrawing it once you’ve got what you want is absolutely asshole behaviour. This but physical intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:25 AM
–

women are more likely to want kinky/rough sex then men
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:13 AM
–

Don't red pillers shit on blue pillers for holding onto beliefs that evidence shows not to be true and they still won't disavow that man? smh
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 08:01 AM
–

Isn’t it low key cruel males will show interest in someone but they don’t want to date the someone and only want to have sex with them? yeah that's so fucked up women should subject men to the same behavior and fuck the men without wanting to date them that'll show men In reality going out on dates is a process of getting to know someone. Men are allowed to change their mind if they want to continue dating a person just like women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:58 AM
–

Member when so many of the red pills would glaze this guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:54 AM
–

/r/DeerAreFuckingStupid
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:48 AM
–

damn press f to pay respects I guess lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:45 AM
2

if people don't read reality according to your opinion and world view they're not normal. Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:36 PM
4

I agree, women are advantaged in dating and enjoy privilege that men do not. I don't understand why acknowledging that means we "distribute women to men like cookies". Why not, as a society, push for women to take on more of the roles and work that men do in traditional dating? Why do we have to leap to "distribute women like cookies"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:35 PM
2

they disregarded reality, that's why they are not normies Anyone who doesn't agree with you is not a "normie" riiigghhhtt
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:21 PM
2

When you say things that we can tell are blatantly contradicting and not in line with reality then yeah we're going to tune you out. Your argument is basically is "everyone know this and agrees with this and if they disagree with it don't listen to them". That's not a convincing argument so of course people are going to disregard it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:16 PM
2

it's a universal truth all normies know and don't question. So this isn't true and you round about admit it but try to get around it by saying "don't listen to people's words" which is the mechanism that people use to question this idea and deny it being a truth. In other words we should ignore your words about this as well. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:08 PM
6

Correct, I simplified it so the point is easier for you to understand since you didn’t catch it the first time around. Disagreement doesn't equal a lack of understanding. Is your thinking really lacking that much in nuance? Also I further addressed your point so you might have missed my expanded reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:01 PM
6

You've just repeated yourself without adding any new information to what you said earlier. I suppose I'll do the same and reiterate what I said but hopefully add some more emphasis to the part not being addressed. When you say that "men treat women differently based on how attractive they find her" is that the MAJORITY of women get treated with some form of flirting or men going out of their way to do something nice for them because they are attractive. The women who don't experience this are in…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 08:51 PM
4

Then when /u/theogfrankcastle says: that is the colder truth which I’m referring to that many women either unintentionally or intentionally (due to the implications it leads to) want to gloss over and act like doesn’t exist They're absolutely right but you're argument boils down to "ignore people doing this because they used words".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 08:20 PM
1

Are you worried about domestic violence or intimate partner violence? Domestic violence can include things such as sisters fighting one another. Or children and parents. If you're actually referring to IPV then whatever standard they use to define, if it were applied to men and women without bias, we would find near parity in rates of victims by sex with men probably being slightly in the lead.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 07:51 PM
2

Women will say over and over they won't find a man attractive without knowing his personality and the shell doesn't matter because they find very few men "hot" just based on looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 07:47 PM
3

Again, literally everyone knows this. Shouldn't matter what people say, it's a universal truth all normies know and don't question. In what make believe world do you think this is the case? Men and women will contradict this depending on how the question is phrased.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 07:45 PM
10

I never understood how this is mind boggling to men. They’re mad women treat attractive men differently…but men do the exact same thing? Men treat beautiful women very differently from ugly women. Why is it shocking when women do the same towards beautiful men? The majority of women get to experience some form of pretty privilege where men go out of their way to do something for the woman because they find the woman attractive. The minority of men ever get to experience this as women are quick t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 07:42 PM
4

Considering how quickly and how much women attack a man's perceived sexual success aka "he isn't getting laid" as an insult you know OP is onto something even if he worded his idea poorly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 04:05 PM
-1

Nice ad hominem towards OP instead of engaging with any of their points.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 04:04 PM
–

You think OP would feel the same if the man had regularly used sex workers or bought other sexual services in the past?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 03:35 PM
–

So many of you are quick to say what a person isn't owed in a relationship but hardly anyone talks about what a partner is owed or obligated to in a relationship when we damn well know that people have expectations of their partners. I'm sure you all have seen how women react when a man says he doesn't go down on women. The retroactively jealousy argument is based on the foundation that women have easier access to getting sex. If men had easier access to a resource that women wanted and then wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 03:28 PM
16

Knowing what I know now about women's gynephilic preferences leading them to think most men are unattractive this comes across as an accusation that is really a confession.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 07:26 PM
3

You can see someone and think they're only ok, but when you get to know them better your attraction can grow. This is why I said physical attraction instead of just attraction. And yes I know that physical attraction can grow when you get to know someone better but part of what is growing that physical attraction are the other types of attraction towards personality, etc. But even with attraction growing for a typical man you're still growing it from a deficit compared to vice versa (generally s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 08:38 PM
2

Out of all of the men who are interested, how many of them want to actually date to try to form something more serious, and how many of them are just looking for sex? ... So it may be true that there's nothing you can do that will ever make that many women want to have sex with you. But that's different than finding a date. And that's why these dating apps are so terrible for dating. Being attractive enough that someone is willing to have sex with is one of the first major hurdles to get over, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 08:12 PM
5

There's been some experiments to measure women's physical attraction to men and its brutal once you know. Given women's tendency to have higher levels of neuroticism compared to men, if women experienced attraction from the opposite sex like men do it would destroy them. You can see the evidence of it already from the small group of women who do struggle in this area.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 08:08 PM
–

If the woman has money like that she can get her a man as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:47 PM
–

I was in the gym over lunch break so not much of a crowd. A woman was walking through the gym was wearing leggings so tight and so far up her ass she literally was walking holding her hand over her ass crack because she was so self conscious of the clothing she chose to wear. smh. This is not the first time I've seen women pulling this move where they feel the need to cover parts of themself because they feel so exposed in their outfits... that they chose for themself.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:06 PM
–

Unattractive women have it the worst when it comes to dating. No matter how bad an unattractive woman has it in dating if she were magically changed into a man its highly unlikely her situation would get better in terms of dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:04 PM
–

Agreed. This video demonstrates this exactly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZaSi3XTdoI Much less all the academic research that shows this being the same. Women expect to be pursued, not to pursue.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 10:53 PM
–

This video demonstrates a lot of the issues: https://youtu.be/pZaSi3XTdoI?list=PLP1uAEAd9e9rS7JCKt1rgvhGmK5eUsM73&t=282 If you grit your teeth having to have her gifts or do other romantic gestures, you dont want a relationship. Not true when during courtship and largely during the relationship as well this expectation is one-sided. If you’re not even entertaining the idea of a relationship without sex by date 3, then relationships were always optional to you. Sex was the main goal. "If you’re n…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 10:51 PM
–

oh my bad misread the tone. Can i use of my get out of jail free cards? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 07:49 PM
–

Damn was trying to keep this light hearted. More like I didn’t get the thing from the store you told me to get 3 times that week. I would consider messaging other women with the intention of hooking up pretty serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 07:28 PM
–

daily cuddles (minimum of 10 mins) If we're allowed to haggle I would like to ask for, in exchange, back scritches at least 3 times a week (minimum of 10 mins) and 2 monthly get out of jail free cards for when I done goofed (terms and conditions apply aka can't be used for a serious fuck up) weekly drive and walk at night across the city Will riding bikes be an accepted substitution on some weeks? no stealing snacks deal breaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:35 PM
–

Women are not a monolith Its called a generality. There's exceptions to pretty much everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:32 PM
1

The female and the male critic came to the same conclusion with the same reasoning. But it wouldn't be the same reasoning as has been explained.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:28 PM
5

Men and women have holes. Exactly. Most women don't have dicks. So if a woman wants to hump her pussy against a dude's rear by all means. But if you think that recognizing that women are capable of asking men out on dates too suddenly means women should be fucking men's urethras with strap-ons all I can say is you can keep fucking that chicken.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:26 PM
6

Nah asking someone on a date is asking someone on a date. Men and women have the same mouth. Having sex between men and women is generally going to involve women being penetrated and men penetrating due to different anatomy. Again, try to be intelligent here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:01 PM
6

then it's even more true that women can criticize that. They can do it, they know what it takes and have the ability. Sure they can criticize but again their criticism won't hold the same weight because they DON'T do these things. That's my point. They may think they know what it takes but they don't really because they're not doing it. And to hold someone to an expectation of doing something you can also do but are unwilling to do is still shitty. "And a lot of women would say the same but at t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 02:09 PM
5

It's asinine to completely invalidate someone with a different POV to suggest that they shouldn't be in the conversation. Except that wasn't done. You're taking the point that's being made and exaggerating it as much as possible to make it easier to attack aka you've constructed the strawman. I'm making the argument that the two observations are not identical and generally wouldn't be regarded with holding the same weight. I never said the other view point would be "completely invalid".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:48 PM
7

Em, no? I can’t write books at all. But i can criticise writing, story, characters etc. I anticipated someone making the critic argument. Critics often lack the ability to do the things they are consumers of. With dating, women can do all the things a man is expected to do for courting and dating. In reality all you need is swipe and then try to hold a conversation and ask a woman out. Guess what, same thing is for me, i also swipe, i also try to hold a conversation, i try to vet. And those “dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:44 PM
1

Thank you for demonstrating my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:39 PM
6

Treating an identical observation with the same reasoning as invalid from one person yet valid from another is a double standard. Its not a double standard to treat someone's viewpoint at holding more weight when they've done the actual thing they're judging you at versus someone who has just "received it" or "observed it".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 06:10 AM
5

I agree with your initial point that replacing the woman complaining with a hypothetical man is a good gauge for whether a man is lazy in dating. I agree with this thought experiment as well since men are expected to take on the more active role in dating (generally speaking) etc etc then their view point will be more meritorious than a woman who (generally speaking) is the one pursued. Because the man has done the actual work, as a man. Faced same challenges, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:53 AM
9

What part of the relationship do women not complain about men during?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:27 AM
11

Sure in a general sense. Also another man and woman could come along, witness the same behavior, and say its not lazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:26 AM
2

Most of the complaints from women come after, when the guy gets complacent in the relationship. The complaints happen the entire duration of the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:07 AM
12

The appeal to hypocrisy fallacy Lets take a look AI Overview Trump and Tu Quoque | Center for Inquiry The appeal to hypocrisy fallacy, or tu quoque ("you too"), discredits an argument by pointing out the arguer's own inconsistency or hypocrisy, rather than addressing the argument's merits, essentially saying, "You do it too, so your point is invalid". It's a distraction (red herring) that shifts focus from the claim's validity (e.g., "Smoking is bad for you") to the person's behavior (e.g., "But…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 05:06 AM
7

Women complain about laziness during the courting/honeymoon phase too.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:36 AM
17

The difference is it generally in bad form to criticize someone for something you're worse at. Its hypocritical. If a man is calling another man lazy in this regard it holds more weight because presumably the man doing the criticizing is doing the chasing, etc. If a woman is making the comment then the woman is holding a man to a standard she's not willing to meet herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:27 AM
15

It might be their first day on Earth, give them a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:24 AM
15

Libido imbalance between men and women. Men are (typically, generally speaking) hornier than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:23 AM
1

But why? Why would what she did before you matter? The past matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:22 AM
10

"So you agree that women act like recruiters" meme basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:18 AM
6

Men (typically, generally speaking) have the higher libido while women (typically, generally speaking) have the lower libido. That's why it works out this way. The fact that women won't acknowledge their advantage in this is them being blind to their privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:14 AM
12

The fact you framed your question as hr screening job recruits instead of two people putting in the work to get to know each other proves OP's point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 04:12 AM
10

where men complain about being alone and how there is a male loneliness epidemic, and yet... they do not approach women. They refuse to do so, justifying their laziness with how anxiety inducing it is. When this is brought up in mixed company women will say there is also a loneliness epidemic for women as well but its not talked about as much. So those lonely women should be approaching as well. But they won't because of how anxiety inducing it is for them. Even though the odds would be better i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 05:36 PM
1

If they ever had a chance at power I'd fight as hard as I do against maga. Wild. Here in the US my biggest concerns are climate change, social healthcare, voting access, campaign reform, police reform, etc etc. Am I'm going to get any reasonable solutions to these problems from the right? Hell no. Yes the left has a misandry problem and I fight against it but I'm not abandoning my other ideals due to that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/26 06:45 PM
2

Right. Or worse. For example sexual assault. Or not so bad like sperm donors. Etc etc.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/25 08:47 AM
1

I'm not opposed to it. But sometimes the mom doesn't know who to paternity test.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/25 08:29 AM
1

Heck that's such a problem now we have to go Maury. "You are NOT the father".
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/25 07:15 PM
1

Nowadays people are starting to keep their last name but I wouldn't be opposed to taking my wife's last name but I ain't married. If just the kids took the mom's last name would work I feel.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/25 06:46 PM
1

That's the issue. There's plenty of people out there with a father's last name that isn't their father. That's why it makes more sense to take our mom's last name because its much more rare for that to be wrong. It would make tracing family lineage much easier.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/25 06:35 PM
1

In my part of the world people don't have hyphenated last names, so they typically take on their father's last name. I'm saying I wouldn't be mad if we started taking on our mother's last name instead as the question of maternity comes up far less often than paternity. So to answer your question, if you consider the passing on of the last name as "credit" than the dad would get credit the same way moms do now.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/25 06:09 AM
1

How about you actually cite your source then and I can see the context of your claim? The citation has been in most of the replies. The 2024 General Social Survey (GSS) data shows that Weekly sexual activity among adults (18-64) dropped to 37% in 2024, down from 55% in 1990
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:49 PM
1

That just means young men aren't fucking weekly. It was men 18 to 64 so not JUST young men, but men. They can still be fucking regularly. Then you need to show the evidence of that because right now I've got the stronger evidence to show.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:44 PM
1

Your study didn't prove that men dont believe in what I said. Of course it didn't because that wasn't the fact I was proving with that study. You didn't realize that?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:41 PM
1

Your stat didn't say that. Are you actually reading what you're typing? How did it not? The amount of men fucking with any regularity is just 37% which is less than half which is less than MOST. Because it's obvious this is about wanting pussy on demand. Only to you sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:38 PM
1

Yes its true that's a strawman filled with logical fallacy and that men don't believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:36 PM
1

Having consistent sex is not struggling. Which MOST men aren't having. What you accidentally did was prove this right: Let me guess, you mean instant sexual gratification, which guys here keep pretending wasn't their actual goal. You can't admit when you're wrong and you lily pad to another point instead. And no, that doesn't prove that right. Pointing out that most men are not having consistent sex in no way says ANYTHING about instant sexual gratification. Please stop trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:29 PM
1

Because I don't need to show causation. The fact that there is "a strong positive association" proves the point you were trying to make isn't true. If it wasn't true there would be strong negative association. Basic logic here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:25 PM
2

Most men are fucking. So we agree that this isn't correct and you calling /u/DashboardPilled a liar is incorrect because your statement isn't supported by the current data and facts. Which proves what /u/DashboardPilled was saying when he told you to provide the more up to date data from the GSS.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:21 PM
1

The 2024 General Social Survey (GSS) data shows that Weekly sexual activity among adults (18-64) dropped to 37% in 2024, down from 55% in 1990
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:15 PM
1

Most men are fucking. The 2024 General Social Survey (GSS) data shows that Weekly sexual activity among adults (18-64) dropped to 37% in 2024, down from 55% in 1990
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:15 PM
0

I dont think you read what I wrote properly whatsoever. No U. The point I made about men displaying antisocial qualities listed above shows a strong positive association with number of sexual partners. You can't refute that now so you're falling back to a strawman take on men's position that isn't supported by the statement you highlighted.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:09 PM
2

First, and in line with prior research, we find that there is a strong positive association between sex partners and antisocial behavior. But furthermore if this "but they hoped by doing the bare minimum of not being an overt asshole and violent felon meant they were good boys that will get pussy for Christmas. " was true, there wouldn't be a positive correlation between the two but a negative correlation. Thus your statement is incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 03:01 PM
2

Sure it does. If some of the people in that post are women, and the agree with the comic then they agree with the idea. There's your one.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 02:54 PM
1

Incels (and non-incel single men) significantly overestimated the importance of physical attractiveness and financial prospects to women, and underestimated the importance of intelligence, kindness, and humor. So about that... Previous studies indicate that economic status is indeed important in male attractiveness. However, no previous study has quantified and compared the impact of equivalent resources on male and female attractiveness. Annual salary is a direct way to evaluate economic status…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 02:53 PM
2

but they hoped by doing the bare minimum of not being an overt asshole and violent felon meant they were good boys that will get pussy for Christmas. The irony is that for men that display these qualities are correlated with greater sexual success. Empirical research has revealed a positive relationship between number of sex partners and involvement in antisocial behaviors.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 02:42 PM
1

You don't need to know what the sub is "for" to see that's a counter example to the claim you made in your title. Please stop trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 02:29 PM
2

At this point aren't you trolling? I don't if the mods are going to go for it when you're being pretty obviously purposely obtuse. How is it everyone in the sub understood the meaning of the post and you're claiming to be lost? The post says, "If you keep being a being a supportive friend we're going to end up like this" and the this is definitely a sexual act, which you acknowledged by guessing masturbation or pegging. Which means that post is saying good manners and good morals will lead to se…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 02:15 PM
2

Look at this person who doesn't drive on roads with no power or water to their house who didn't use public education etc etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 02:08 PM
3

FUKKEN A RIGHT?? How dumb are we as a sex/gender that we can't see the benefits we get from these programs and safety nets? "Waahhh left leaning parties are trying to make my life better but they didn't say it was for me specifically so now I don't want it". Holy fuck my fellow men get on my nerves with that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 02:07 PM
3

Bro I’m black lmao not too long Goldman Sachs’s just donate 10 billion to black women initiative It took me as minute but you do realize that Goldman Sachs's is not the left? They are an investment bank and as an organization you really think they lean left? LMAO. So an investment bank investing in black women is no critique on the left supporting men or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 02:06 PM
2

Bro I’m black Ok, hope you don't get spent. This right here is still true. its really mostly young white men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 12:07 PM
1

While I agree her take is insane I wouldn't be upset if we started passing down our mother's name instead since we all come from our mom.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/12/25 12:02 PM
–

you should come over to /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates if you're not there already.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:57 AM
–

Give them something... like a college scholarship? Or a grant? so that logic isn’t going to Basically admitting that logic isn't going to work with young men. I see that play out far too often so you're absolutely right. You've helped me to realize one of young men's problems is that they see themselves as some separate group instead of in this shit with the rest of us. And lets be real, its really mostly young white men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:56 AM
–

The post has context.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:52 AM
–

And there are a hell of a lot of policies that the other other party are pushing that are making people's lives actively worse, causing them to go broke, taking away their rights, etc etc. Between the two political leanings one is definitely making more of an attempt to address the issues we face than the other which largely only serves the pedophilic owner class.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:48 AM
–

Listen but you can’t keep telling men to put their self last and expect to keep going unless you can give them something anything to hold them over your going to keep having these problems Getting a college grant and scholarship that helped pay for my education putting is not putting myself last. A social program doesn't have to be targeted directly at me being a man for me to benefit from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:46 AM
–

Its in the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:44 AM
–

As opposed to the party that openly hates anyone that's not a rich white man? For the things that impact my daily life day to day between the two political leanings we're talking about, one is attempting to the address those problems while the other is actively making them worse. I see my fellow men vote against any sort of social progress that would address these issues and vote to make their own lives worse and mine too. Consistently. In the US both parties have also pushed policies that most …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:42 AM
–

"No one told men that good manners and good morals translated to sexual desire within most women." They did
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:39 AM
–

Respectfully those aren’t specific for childless men but I understand what you’re saying That's the point. The college grant didn't have to be specifically for childless men to benefit me, a childless man. That's how social safety nets work. And if we as a society broaden them, then they will end up helping more people in need, which will include men. A rising tide lifts all boats.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:29 AM
–

fixed
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:27 AM
–

If young men can't see the problems their facing due to the climate getting worse, lack of access to affordable healthcare or education, the cost of living going up, growing wealth inequality and not connect the dots of which party is making these things worse and which party is trying to address these issues than that's on them. Its not like climate change is going to ignore me because I'm a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:25 AM
–

I got a grant that helped pay for a lot of my college as well as a scholarship. The scholarship was for anyone that maintained a certain gpa throughout high school and the grant was for low income families. I sure would have liked access to healthcare growing up though. Edit: We were on food stamps at one time growing up. My pops is now on medicare and social security and medicare literally saved his life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:20 AM
–

meanwhile... https://np.reddit.com/r/LetGirlsHaveFun/comments/1hgejmg/average_friendship_with_moids/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:16 AM
–

What you're referring to would be called a social safety net but that is constantly under attack by the right sooo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 11:13 AM
7

There's another motivation behind this that is less discussed. Males generally having higher libido than females gives females the ability to extract resources from males. Baumeister and Vohs did an excellent journal article on it that should be "required reading" for this sub. Here's a link to the journal article https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_2?icid=int.sj-abstract.similar-articles.1 and then here's a link to the full article: https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/7150…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/25 01:50 PM
13

If you'd do that as a man then do that as a woman and spoil your man. Nothing stopping you miss.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/10/25 12:58 AM
1

Insert Clarkson "Oh no! anyway..." meme here
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 08:33 PM
2

Do not listen to that Sub. Why not? The sub, particularly the user's post I mentioned earlier, pointed to good research articles about the differences in attraction between men and women. The summary being that hetero women on some levels show higher levels of attraction to one another than they do men. So when women say, "Only 1 in 100 men are actually attractive" you realize this is not a shortcoming of men but how women are wired.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/09/25 02:41 PM
13

The sub /r/GirlsDontLikeBoys had some quality effort posts by /u/maleeducation1 that were very eye opening for me and changed my worldview about this very subject u/BriefGuidance9784 don't engage with someone if you're going to immediately blocked if your worldview is challenged. That's weak as hell. Here's what they said: Yet majority 99% of them still date and have sex with Men. I've seen women be with bums. That "source" really isnt giving any valuable information because women will literally…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/09/25 01:16 AM
8

For the second slide. Tell any woman that if she wants less attention from men she should dress down more modestly and see how quickly they say they dress up for other women. I'm literally in a back and forth with a woman telling me that now.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/25 11:25 AM
2

My argument is I believe the evidence. Your anonymous anecdote is not going to make me disregard scientific evidence that has tested this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:48 PM
–

Oh crap, my brain skipped over the low functioning part. You're right.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:26 PM
–

There was. That's how humans and society work. Your not the first ppd woman to deny this but this has literally been tested and there is academic literature to back this up. PPD women just lie about it. There's even informal youtube videos that show it. Same thing happens to guys. If they're fit enough and dress in similarly sexualized, provocative dress they will also get sexual attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:25 PM
–

"Autism of all forms" would include people who are severely intellectually disabled to the point of needing assistance from an adult to function in day-to-day life. And I bet the chances are high those people get very little action. The vast majority of the time Reddit appears to be talking about high functioning autism but casually refers to it as just "autism." That's an assumption but unless you ask OP if this was the case we can't be certain.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:19 PM
–

Nah. For instant sociopathy isn't as much of a hindrance.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:17 PM
–

And my point is that that hasn't been my experience. I already said every ppd woman is the exception. And you did admit it was your experience. you said As a woman, I do my best to not look too attractive So not TOO attractive but not unattractive. And had you dressed more proactively you would have gotten more attention than baseline. and if you dressed even more modestly, the amount of attention would have been less.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:16 PM
–

Same thing: attention ≠ attractiveness. But being attractive will bring you more attention. And being less attractive will bring you less attention. That's why women describe feeling invisible as they age, because they're less attractive so they get less attention. As a woman, I do my best to not look too attractive, and I doubt I am, but I still get attention from men. Every ppd woman is the exception. And I already addressed this: I never stated that dressing modestly/less sexualization will s…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:10 PM
–

High functioning autism You changed the scope. They didn't say "high functioning autism" just "austistic" aka autism in all forms. High functioning or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:07 PM
–

I was underage when I first started getting sexualized. So I'm not sure dressing differently would have made a difference. And I've seen underaged women sexualize themselves. Boys their age exist. I never stated that dressing modestly/less sexualization will stop all unwanted attention, but it will have an effect on the rate/amount/severity. Also, you're conflating sexualization with attention. These are not decoupled concepts. Increasing your attractiveness to people means sexualizing yourself …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:04 PM
–

The differences in your messages is that you’re telling women the unwanted attention they get is because of their efforts. So youre arguing that effort into appearance has no effect on the attraction you'll generate? In other words that women's effort into their appearance has no effect on their attractiveness? Here's another way to think about this. PPD will generally agree that men find younger women attractive than older women if all other variables are the same for the most part. And women w…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:44 PM
–

Its interesting in how you can state the same fact, but the crowd you're addressing will either agree or disagree depending on the path you take to get there. Fact: The amount of effort you put into your appearance will affect how much attention and attraction you generate. Path1 : Also, there's the fact that women put far, FAR more effort into their appearance than the average man, and you have the cultural attitude that women "are just more beautiful". People and women especially will agree. P…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:04 PM
–

In fandoms she maybe has a point. But keep in mind a lot of the sympathy comes from the women in the audience. Just like the women who fawn over serial killers. In real everyday life? lol. lmao even.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 02:20 PM
–

Welcome to a man's world baby. She complains about becoming invisible when you know she also complained about unwanted attention when she was younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 02:17 PM
12

If I wasn’t so lazy I would make two subreddits. One for dating advice and one for relationship advice. But in each one you can’t refer to sex, gender, or age. Basically don’t include demographic information. I would also encourage posters to use names specific for the sub so people don’t try and go thru the comments to deduce what op is. The goal would be for women to experience the advice men often get when men talk about their dating woes, such as lowering their standards, going to the gym wi…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/25 10:46 AM
1

You're right I do avoid bitches.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 07:49 PM
1

You mean your reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:04 PM
0

Nah. I addressed the point directly you made in response to my post.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:47 PM
2

Then go to r/purplepillechochamber. I see the blue pill guys and red pill guys go back and forth all the time. If any group on here displays echo chamber behavior it’s the ladies as they avoid disagreeing with each other for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 10:47 AM
0

Once again someone responds without reading or addressing any points I made. By this logic you think homosexuality is a choice, since men could get “gay sex if they wanted to”. Following that reasoning that would mean that gay men could be straight if they wanted to since again, you think homosexuality is a choice. Implicitly you support gay conversion camps and other forms of discrimination against homosexual men since they could just choose not to be gay. Nice casual gay erasure there. And if …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 10:43 AM
1

The man being lazy and the woman being the one putting in all the effort in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:26 AM
1

Actually looks do, the halo effect is a mother. Two people doing the same actions the more attractive person will be rated as having better character. They've tested this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:26 AM
1

There's a reason most women can trade access to their sex for additional resources while most men can't. Hetero men don't have a sexual attraction to other men like hetero women do. Just like gay men don't have an attraction to women. https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2F1l3bvbc66rcf1.png
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:23 AM
1

I’m hurt now? proceeds to type out wall of text You keep going with the personal attacks and statements instead of sticking to the points. And then you want to say "I expect more of a debate sub" expect more of yourself to start with. I never said I will believe that “most women X” if they show me a Reddit post. Who said that you did say that? I didn't say that. You're making up an argument to attack that no one else made. Again, you've constructed the strawman. I said I’ll take anything you can…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:10 AM
6

What matters what sub I looked at? Who argued that? You’re attacking an argument you made up. The classic strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 11:51 PM
1

Hyperbole, not strawman. Hyperboles are a way to construct strawmen. You did the literal definition of a strawman. I see that that it hurts you a lot that I’m not going to take a Reddit post as concrete evidence for such a claim. I'm hurt now? You can stop resorting to personal attacks and insults to cloud the fact you don't have an argument. as far as the "I’m not going to take a Reddit post as concrete evidence for such a claim." how many times do I have to repeat to you if that's the case you…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 09:58 PM
6

That’s not whats being talked about. That's exactly what is being talked about. Most women have never said they find niceness sexually attractive. Right, so when I say: Women don't care about "niceness" in a partner. So they demonize "nice guys". You agree with me. No, guys want agreeable women with low standards. That doesnt mean she’s good nor nice. Nope. As the study I linked found, men do want "nice" partners. The "low standards" is really just similar standards that your regular guy has but…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 09:51 PM
4

so you're on a debate forum to not debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 09:46 PM
11

What experiment. Birnbaum, G. E., Ein-Dor, T., Reis, H. T., & Segal, N. (2014). Why Do Men Prefer Nice Women? Gender Typicality Mediates the Effect of Responsiveness on Perceived Attractiveness in Initial Acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(10), 1341-1353. They do. Its just not the only trait. Again, they don't for the most part. Not nearly to the extent that men do. r/NiceGuys shows thats not the case. NiceGuys doesn't show that's not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:54 PM
1

Then link it. I want to see what youre looking at, You've been the one making claims, show the proof. Link your graph. I've linked to a graph demonstrating what I said in an earlier comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:46 PM
2

Yeah I think it's more of a tongue and cheek sort of thing with women. Like someone else said they aren't going to fork over their entire bank account like men do. Women's sex generally has value where as men's generally doesn't. So women want some form of resources in exchange where as men are generally expected to give some in exchange.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:41 PM
3

I don't think men and women should be considered the same when it comes to their thirsting behavior In what way?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:39 PM
2

same.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:31 PM
0

Protip: if someone says "citation needed" or asks for proof make sure you get them to specifically lay out what they want for proof. Do they want an example to show its a thing that happens or are they really asking for peer reviewed studies, etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:28 PM
1

But I will not take a Reddit post as proof that all women bad. Where did someone ask for proof of that. You're now making an exaggeration of what was actually asked for. That's a strawman. I’m sorry if that makes you cry and scream YOU LIAR YOU LIAR SEE SEE? WOMEN ARE BAD I HATE WOMEN. How am I crying and screaming? Another strawman and ad hominem as well. Who's arguing in bad faith again? And where do I say I hate women? You're just making shit up now because you were called out on your moving …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:25 PM
1

It wasn’t a lie. Why are you so upset? I will take that link, it’s just not good proof, I’m sorry. It was a lie. You were asked what you wanted for proof and you said anything. Then when given anything you say that's not good enough. I’m sorry. Reddit posts aren’t data. Then you should have stated that when you were asked what you would accept as proof. That's why you were asked. To avoid this exact situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:19 PM
1

Anecdotes aren’t proof of what most women do, sorry to tell you that’s not how data collection works That's why before i provided an example of this I asked you to state specifically what you were looking for. So if you wanted more rigorous data or example, it was on you to state that. But you said "anything" when you clearly didn't mean that. And you probably knew that at the time so it looks liked you lied and deceived, which I anticipated. maintain intellectual integrity when making absolute …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:17 PM
0

The study had a graph showing it. The graph didn't show what you're claiming it did. Also the bottom 80% got 60% of women’s attention. Hence, showing looks matter more to guys than girls. Now you're making things up whole cloth. When doing the math,it showed the top 33 of both genders get 66% of the attention. You're wildly misinterpreting the data in bad faith to make a claim that's not supported.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:03 PM
1

You’re not “asking questions to understand”, you’re leading me down a rhetorical path without showing your cards. That’s not a discussion. You’re playing quizmaster controlling the conversation. Say your point straight up so we can debate like adults. So me asking you to explain your reasoning is not a discussion? Seems like a discussion to me. Am I not asking you to "say your point straight up" just like you're asking of me?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:02 PM
1

I’ll take anything that you can use to back that claim So this was a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:59 PM
1

You: Anecdotes aren’t proof of what most women do. But also you I’ll take anything that you can use to back that claim So basically you lied and now you're doing exactly what I knew you would do as I said here: Lay out exactly what you want to see in a citation before someone goes through the effort just for the goalposts to get moved. Read you like a book. If you weren't going to consider an anecdote as part of "I’ll take anything that you can use to back that claim" then you should have said t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:59 PM
6

And they still disproportionately ignored the average women. No they don't. If this was true then there would be a large pool of women who can't find partners. But that's not the case. It's men who can't find partners while women have a pool of men willing to date them. You guys always forgot that portion of the study and I know its intentional. The study didn't say that. Other studies have show that generally speaking the most unattractive women will do as well as the most attractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:56 PM
17

Many of them do. No they don't. This has been measured in more than one experiment. Guys here just dont want to hear that because it confirms ‘Nice guys’ not as good they think they are. Nope. Women don't care about "niceness" in a partner. So they demonize "nice guys".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:53 PM
1

Men rate women's attractiveness on basically a normal distribution. Women say the vast majority of men are unattractive. That's just one of the issues with women's standards. source: https://i.imgur.com/VPKSEEm.png
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:50 PM
1

instead of treating me like a retard Asking you questions to lay out the logic of your beliefs is treating you like a retard? That's ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:45 PM
2

I am willing to entertain an anecdote, my issue with the link is that I didn’t see anywhere that her bitchy wife is withholding sex to get what she wants? (Greater and more expensive things) Again. The post that got asked for a citation needed didn't make any claim about withholding sex. and i quoted that in the reply you just replied to. Are you purposely not reading?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:44 PM
1

That's what my citation demonstrated. The wife is pushing the husband for a bigger more expensive house because she's not satisfied with the house they currently have. Exactly what /u/nefariousnessmost660 was talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:42 PM
3

Her answer was: The things people owe in a relationship. There isn’t anything women or men owe in particular. Love, attention, understanding etc. and then about domestic labor: If you both live in the same house you should both take care of the house. Women do more of the domestic labor in most households .... Because nowadays women are also working full time jobs. It’s unfair. They’re also tired after work. When asked the following question: What other aspects of relationships are "unfair" to y…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:39 PM
1

What is this ridiculous socratic discussion? Just say what you want to say. I’m willing to go down any logical path you want and discuss that but this argument format is ridiculous. It’s not a Q & A. How can you go down any logical path if you don't explain your logic when asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:34 PM
2

So predictable. I knew you would find a way to claim the evidence wasn't valid. So the tactic this time is to ask why the citation doesn't reference a subject that wasn't part of the what /u/NefariousnessMost660 said when /u/kyonshi61 asked for a citation. "withholding sex" was not what the "citation needed" was referring to. Citation needed was to this post: Yes, but most women are usually the ones who are rarely content with what they have, even if its enough to survive and live off of. They s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:30 PM
1

I’ll take anything that you can use to back that claim There is where I done goofed. What is "that claim"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:28 PM
3

People in general are having hard times making friends and meeting others.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 10:14 AM
–

I see ppd men argue with each other all the time. I've rarely seen ppd women argue with one another. But women aren't a monolith right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 10:11 AM
4

What other aspects of relationships are "unfair" to you because one partner "does more" than the other? Anything you can think of that's unfair for the man because he does it more?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 10:10 AM
7

I see where you’re going Do you? You again didn't answer the questions asked. Again, partners owe each other love but what does that look like or mean in concrete terms to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 10:06 AM
3

took all of 3 seconds... https://np.reddit.com/r/Marriage/comments/v69leh/my_wife_is_bent_on_a_newexpensive_house_how_do_i/ now we hear why it doesn't count or prove anything
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 10:02 AM
2

Why is it a problem women do more of the domestic labor?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 12:55 AM
8

So if partners owe each other “love” what does that mean? What does showing or demonstrating love to your partner look like? How do you show or demonstrate understanding? Or attention?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 12:53 AM
2

What’s proof to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 12:49 AM
2

pretty impressive strawman you've constructed there
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 10:46 PM
3

God forbid they pull their weight for domestic labor. What does it mean exactly "to pull their weight for domestic labor"?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 10:45 PM
1

Lay out exactly what you want to see in a citation before someone goes through the effort just for the goalposts to get moved. edit: the goalposts got moved.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 10:44 PM
7

You didn't answer the question. What do women "owe" men in a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 10:43 PM
1

So what do women “owe” men in a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 05:01 PM
–

Why don't men treat their lovers with love anymore? This same gimmick? Still trolling twox for engagement bait I see. Yes this one example exemplifies your typical relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 04:22 PM
3

This post is related: https://np.reddit.com/r/HolUp/comments/1len93x/disappointed/ You can see the response people have to any men in that post who might be intimidated by the fact that some women view sex toys as superior. People tell these men that women don't really think that, they're being insecure, etc.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/06/25 06:18 PM
5

It’s not okay to shit on an entire group of people and basically say that they’re only good for their genitals. Well said and I agree.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/06/25 06:14 PM
26

Guns are used as a scapegoat in these conversations. "use more lethal methods like guns" so explain Canada, Europe, and Australia where guns are *not as widely available but the sex gap in death by suicide still exists.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/06/25 02:16 PM
11

I’ll complain about it. It sucks. I’ve got male friends I’ve been trying to see in person for year+ and they just won’t meet up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 02:11 PM
19

And feminism implies it prioritizes women, but they’ll tell you that feminism is for everyone Pretend you could split the same feminist supporting person in two and put them in separate rooms. Depending on how you approached the subject of feminism being for everyone vs feminism being for women you could get the same person to agree with both and end up contradicting themselves. I tend to point out how the feminism sub says that all posts must relate to women's issues as the first posting rule a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/25 08:51 PM
5

I'm everything this picture says. I reach out my friends. I make room for them to share their emotions and feelings. I listen. All the things the comments say men need to be better at. I've also been single more years of my life than any of my peers. But fuck me right I must be a piece of shit somehow according to these people.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/25 05:27 PM
–

There's almost always exceptions to most generalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 06:45 PM
8

So much this. Feminism and equality when it breaks their way, trad gender roles when it doesn't.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/05/25 06:09 AM
3

The thing is you got feminism the movement and feminists the followers. And the things that feminists do to men while claiming to be feminists can be cruel and inhumane.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/05/25 06:09 AM
18

If men and women got judged by the same objective criteria with no regards to sex/gender then women would start putting up much more numbers on these stats than they do now. I was in a discussion on another sub a few months ago about IPV (intimate partner violence) and the men there said themselves that women's IPV perpetrated towards men had to reach a certain threshold of damage before they would even count it as "IPV". Don't even get me started on the studies that show women commit more one s…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/05/25 11:03 PM
33

I wonder if that commenter would have said the same thing if the roles were reversed? Women hate the "if the genders/roles were reversed" so I like to hit them with "what if they were both women?". The gears in their brain grind to a halt as all their misandrist thinking can't be justified anymore because there's not a man to hate.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/05/25 12:42 PM
16

"Are you setting me up for a trap? Are you asking me a question that you will get upset with me if I don't "answer right" or if I tell the truth? Don't ask me these type of questions if you're going to react negatively if I'm truthful." Because my real answer is I'm going for the prettiest girl cuz I get more money and I get to kiss the prettiest girl in the world. I'd would want to tell the woman asking me "Don't be so conceited to think that's you (prettiest girl in the world). We know if you …
/r/EverydayMisandry09/05/25 11:40 AM
4

"feminism is for women AND men camp". I wish I could be in the room with your friends to point out that one of the largest feminist spaces on the net, the feminism subreddit, states: Feminism is the pursuit of equality in regards to women's rights. and all posts and discussions must be relevant to women's issues The movement that is supposedly for me too if I go to the biggest places on the net to discuss my issues or problems silences me and says my problems can't be discussed. And its not just…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/05/25 03:35 PM
4

rant about being cat called Yet women are starting to lament that men don't approach them or make the first move any more? And women do way more to sexualize themself than men do. discriminated against for their ... clothing Everyone is on some level. this woman is basically asking for the ability to wear whatever she wants and not face any judgement for it. No one has that ability or right. We're all judged for what we wear.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/05/25 02:07 AM
3

Aren't most of the submissions on this sub from members who go into places like twox to show examples of the twisted thinking of modern hateful women?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/05/25 02:03 AM
5

The last pic sends me. so maybe in some very specific contexts, we get away with certain bad things that men wouldn't get away with. Really the whole criminal justice system with a few exceptions but go imagine a world where men were oppressed Are you familiar at all with history or class consciousness? Ever heard of slavery? The audacity to say that without a hint of irony. and written out of history So you're telling me that because Mary Shelley doesn't get her due props for being one of the f…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/05/25 02:02 AM
56

You all remember what the left did to the Bernie Bros? A decade ago you had a left leaning awakening in young men that were supporting Bernie and the rest of the left had to paint Bernie as some sort of secret racist in order to stamp it down. And I'm starting to hear those same arguments being dusted off for AOC/Bernie's stop the oligarchy tours. "Those crowds tend to be a certain color".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/25 12:43 PM
1

I’ve been doing my laundry since I was 12.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/25 01:52 PM
2

Oh shit I didn’t even put that together but you’re right! 😂
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/25 04:57 PM
10

There are plenty of women in the office, both of the other wings are entirely women. I've never once heard them say anything about their partners/husbands at all, but maybe that's just because I don't spend as much time with them and am not located amongst them. STOP THE CAP. its a meme at this point about how women get togeter to bitch about their partners/husbands.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/25 04:15 PM
9

This is so much projection. Its usually wives and gf's who gather together and bitch about their husbands and bf's. They're more likely to do it and more vocal about it. To the point I've read articles and comments from other women who get tired of hearing it. Complaining is gender-linked behavior. John Gottman says women make 85% of complaints in a relationship, while men complain 15% in heterosexual relationships. https://np.reddit.com/r/AskWomenOver30/comments/1i3ycxq/do_a_lot_of_you_really_d…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/25 04:12 PM
1

This is so much projection. Its usually wives and gf's who gather together and bitch about their husbands and bf's. They're more likely to do it and more vocal about it. To the point I've read articles and comments from other women who get tired of hearing it.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/25 03:44 PM
44

Its this all over again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/25 01:42 PM
46

I'll always be impressed about the psyop feminists pulled changing the meaning of "nice guy". To them a "nice guy" = asshole meanwhile an actual asshole = assertive confident man. The reason for this is that women don't value niceness in a partner like men do. So when men display a quality they want in their partner women demonize that trait because they don't value it. source: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167214543879
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 06:46 AM
45

Hmm shaming someone over their perceived sexual promiscuity sure sounds like a form of slut shaming which is supposed to be bad. but in this case men are shamed for a lack of sexuality. literally reverse slut shaming.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 06:39 AM
7

For women it comes to them. For men they have to chase after it. When its an equal struggle then we can use equal standards. Here's another double standard. When men have difficulties in dating its "lower your standards and work on yourself". When its a woman, "where have all the good men gone?".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 08:25 AM
–

I'm in IT and I sit on my ass all day. My make believe wife is a nurse and we work the same amount of hours. Still think we should split chores 50/50 when she has the more physically demanding job?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 01:49 AM
5

Like the right isn’t?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 07:27 PM
1

Have you heard of hag-maxxing?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:18 PM
2

What does marriage really change in a long term committed relationship other than making it harder for the man to leave after the woman stops making an effort because she's got the ring now? These women saying a relationship isn't real without marriage really telling on themselves on what they really want.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:17 PM
1

Yup pretty much. I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:16 PM
–

Yes it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:28 PM
1

What I brought up did relate to the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:16 PM
–

So you brought up something not related to your argument? Weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:14 PM
–

Coconut island.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:13 PM
–

Well I disagree with them too
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 12:00 PM
–

Acting like the idea of blue pill being for equality is some strange position is silly. Blue pill has actual principles it advocates for instead of being “just the opposite of red pill and black pill”. This is a very biased response to cover yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:58 AM
–

Is blue pill against equality now?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:53 AM
1

Trying to act like my example is hyper specific in the beginnings of the ad hom. This isn’t a me thing, it’s more broad than that. By trying to act like it’s a me thing you can shift focus from my argument to making it seem some sort of personal failing. A classic tactic here. And no I wouldn’t say “ALL” feminists do anything as that’s a strawman. There seems to be a struggle with nuance here. As for why wouldn’t women do things that benefit them question if that’s the argument we’re making for …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:53 AM
–

If you’re blue pill I would assume you would be for equality. But here you are defending why you won’t do something you expect men to do as if men don’t have bad experiences pursuing women and your characterization of the men you pursued is full of sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:36 AM
–

When men complain about how they are disadvantaged in society men’s movements are derailed because feminists claim to fight against the patriarchy which harms men too. But they leave out the part they won’t fight for men. It’s a rhetorical sleight of hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:31 AM
–

This is what women do in general. Not a “just me” thing. Literal data that tracks who approaches who. Who pays for dates etc. But nice try at an ad hom. Always gotta pivot to personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:29 AM
–

Funny how this argument is no where to be seen when women do the whole “but feminism fights the patriarchy” when men point out where they are disadvantaged in society. So when women take advantage of equality/trad gender roles it’s “feminism fights for women’s issues” When men point out where they are disadvantaged in society it’s “that’s because of patriarchy and feminism fights that too” Meanwhile ever post in r feminism has to be about women’s issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:27 AM
–

You got what “feminists” argue and what they do. I’m more concerned with what they do. And they pursue policy to give them a leg up when they feel disadvantaged such as the debunked wage gap and then in their personal lives resort to trad gender roles for dating but back to feminism when bitching about household chores and “emotional labor” while ignoring the amount of romantic labor they refuse to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:24 AM
–

Advocating would be pushing for equity and equality everywhere, even if it meant giving up some of your advantages. With women pushing for equality and equity when they would gain and then falling back to trad gender roles when they have the advantage they’re just being female supremacists.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:16 AM
5

So there’s a large pool of slightly over weight women with very little prospects in dating? Oh wait that’s men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:09 AM
–

Equality and equity when women don’t have the advantage. Trad gender roles when they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:07 AM
6

reallesbians and actuallesbians full of such comments.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/03/25 07:41 PM
1

No. I mean what you personally, specifically are saying is misogynistic. No, any criticism of women at all feels misogynistic to you because you can't take that criticism. But your feelings don't make it true. I'm sorry that pointing out your misogyny makes you a little hysterical. Maybe you should seek help for your irrational hatred rather than making me deal with it? Kthx. More personal attacks with projection thrown in. Nice logical argument you make there.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 07:38 PM
1

Just say you hate women and save us both sometime. You really think criticism of women must mean we hate them? Being a little hysterical aren't we?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 07:20 PM
2

"Don't sexualize my breasts!" You first ma'am.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 07:18 PM
2

That was my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 07:16 PM
1

Its a period joke relax. Those are challenging conditions to begin with and now the woman has to deal with the cramps, diarrhea and headaches, etc and the men have to deal with the woman being on a shorter fuse because she's having to deal with all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 07:15 PM
4

Nobody is forcing them. It's a choice. This but sex work
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 07:02 PM
2

What if I get my period?! 😭 God help those men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 07:01 PM
0

You assume abusive men are awash in pussy, but there's no evidence for that. The average woman has 5 or fewer partners. Me saying that women will go for serial killers and Chris Browns doesn't mean "abusive men are awash in pussy" thats ANOTHER strawmanwoman. Well, you obviously don't like women You sound like a cop. Cops say this whenever someone points out their flaws, because cops are extraordinarily sensitive and defensive. This applies here as well. and have taken nothing but the shittiest …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 06:59 PM
–

Oh then that makes all the sense. me too unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 05:56 PM
–

that's the age people started doing those sorts of things. this is surprising to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 05:52 PM
–

you suck one dick...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 05:51 PM
–

Why the hell not? I don't choose my friends based on how attractive I find them. I don't think that's much of a thing? People say this and you may genuinely think this but people operate on all sorts of unconscious biases. That's why testing these things is so much more valuable than self reporting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 05:47 PM
–

15 👀 Yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 05:46 PM
2

It's a famous person, therefore it's not a relevant comparison. Why not? This isn't something that only happens because the person is famous. But again, it happens enough that there are whole ass essays telling women to cut it out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsvYHV8oP60 Amber Heard got knocked up after all this Johnny Depp stuff. Oh so NOW Amber is a shitty person. Go say that in twox or fauxmoi and let me know how quick you get banned. But ONLY WOMEN fall for bad people. LOL misogynists ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 05:45 PM
–

Nono, it's "anecdotal" and an "incel fairy tale"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:32 PM
2

Its not a fairy tale, it happened. Talk about delusional denial to an inconvenient fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:30 PM
–

Judge gets mail from women begging him to spare life of tattooed killer as love letters pour into jail https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/wade-wilson-murder-women-letters-b2581434.html "Women don't chose bad boys" ok but they write letters for them
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:07 PM
3

OMG why are people still saying this with a straight face? No, women don't like alpha bad boys. They like confident men with their shit together. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/wade-wilson-murder-women-letters-b2581434.html
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:05 PM
–

can't argue that, grandma food is good. enjoy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:03 PM
–

is that lunch tacos?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 04:00 PM
–

It is taco tuesday after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:59 PM
–

what is used to generate these?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:48 PM
–

Replace "confident" with "lonely" and lots things about current society start to make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:29 PM
–

np.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1jjffec/huh/ Fun comments in this one. A lot of the classics make an appearance. It’s another one of those incel memes where they lament that women’s standards are either too high or too contradictory. I mean when women proudly proclaim they find something like over half of men unattractive... https://imgur.com/a/JDMiK6Y Unreasonable standards being: the men have to take daily showers and not be violent. Take the shower pill, that's all you have to d…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:27 PM
–

Low birthrate is an exceptionally good thing. The ironic thing about that analysis is when you compare hetero couples to lesbian couples. The rates of violence go up. Divorce goes up. The "mental burden" is women's higher neuroticism compared to men. The whole violence thing is bullshit as men will say that they won't count their SO's violence against them until it reaches a certain threshold. So if someone came up with a genderless standard of what counts as intimate partner violence and then a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:21 PM
1

This is even worse. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 08:31 PM
1

I get it now. Someone swapped your . key with the return key.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 08:29 PM
1

Someone is sensitive I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 08:04 PM
1

This formatting is terrible
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 08:01 PM
39

Young men whom everyone seems to be fighting for the vote of. Remember when there was a homegrown movement of men moving left and becoming socially aware, the Bernie Bros? And how others on the left ostracized them while powerful forces made sure Bernie lost? I wonder how many of those former Bernie bros, fed up with the status quo, are now MAGA.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/25 10:47 PM
8

Every time I disprove this "incel" garbage With all due respect your personal anecdotes don't disprove anything. They're just stories from an anonymous person online.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/03/25 10:44 PM
17

A guy who has faced mostly rejection through out his life is going to a hotel to be interviewed about being an incel. But something comes up and the interviewer asks him to go to the bar and wait and all of a sudden an attractive woman comes up to him, initiates with him, maybe for the first time in his life ever, and you expect this person to be like, "oh yeah this must be a sincere and legitimate indicator of interest from an attractive woman right before my incel interview in this hotel".
/r/EverydayMisandry20/03/25 08:31 PM
15

When he's at the bar I'd have an attractive woman approach him and strike up conversation. When he inevitably clams up and has a little panic attack, I'd call him up for the interview and ask him why he didn't ask her out. Because he would know it wasn't genuine and something wasn't right about the situation.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/03/25 07:48 PM
18

Gay men are pretty small portion of the population but they were able to make spaces for themselves, aka gay bars. Women are a much larger proportion of the population, have much more purchasing power, they should be able to make these women only gyms instead of demanding someone else do it for them.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/25 03:30 PM
1

"Oh you don't want me to touch you??" I'm sure you can think of situations you can create and then say this back to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 03:39 PM
1

check your pm's.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/03/25 02:28 PM
3

Literally why r/WomenAreViolentToo was made.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/25 02:55 PM
31

I can understand that. I can't help but wonder if that number is that low due to women being "let off" for the same crimes that men would be charged for. For example, shoplifting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 04:15 PM
5

Are you asking?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 03:51 PM
2

https://np.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1ftc3lb/jesus_fucking_christ/ Exterminated in masses. There you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 07:21 AM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/meirl/comments/1iq3soh/meirl/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 06:38 AM
49

"feminism fights for men"
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/25 06:01 AM
1

but the officers remain firm in their assertion that the widespread backlash against DEI we are now seeing is a product of racism coming primarily from white men who are "scared they're losing power." I've had arguments against posters in here who were identified as white and described DEI as "racial based hiring practices" and "racial policy" aimed at the "dominant group". So the DEI officer is not completely wrong in that sentiment even among supposed left wing people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 04:37 AM
1

Nah there's been studies that backup a lot of what /u/Eater0fChildren is saying. You can find them in the dark pill science subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 12:23 PM
3

Instead of flipping the genders I find imagining if another woman would tolerant that behavior from a woman. I seriously doubt a woman would just take another woman hitting her with responding with like force.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/03/25 04:53 PM
–

real
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:02 AM
–

Men are brutal over women’s looks. Its not men out here proudly proclaiming that the majority of women are unattractive. For the few men that do other men call them out on it quick. However that's become a catchphrase for modern women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 08:00 AM
–

not even then. gen z is hag maxxing these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 07:59 AM
–

I think conventionally attractive women tend to downplay how much external validation affects them positively because they get it in such excess they take it for granted. If external validation mattered a little as some imply then taking it away shouldn't affect women much at all. However reading women's stories and the depression they feel when they get little to any external validation will tell you otherwise. That's where invisible women come from.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 07:58 AM
2

For real.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 02:33 AM
1

Buck Angel enters the room.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 11:26 PM
3

The amount of trivial shit women will run to the internet to tell on their SO's about, thus feeding into the complex of "all men are trash" is staggering.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:38 PM
3

Yeah, all those women who are single with no prospects for dating. It sure is tough for them. You know who really judges women for their looks? Other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:34 PM
2

exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:32 PM
1

The argument is basically trying to say that looks and attractiveness doesn't matter in dating success which is ignoring reality... hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:31 PM
1

Women do it to themselves. It's not like these women are single with no prospects.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:29 PM
3

To a point. If its big enough women will notice. Some dude setup a camera to catch women staring and taking pictures of his package in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:26 PM
2

I think you make a good point. In hetero dating men would live to receive the treatment they give women in a lot of ways. Women wouldn't want the reverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:25 PM
3

With as hard as this post is being moderator I'm saving the OP now.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:23 PM
1

counterpoint: gay men are more fun https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLFrpYeIHVc
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:15 PM
2

I'm pretty sure men could get unsolicited pussy pics and be fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:08 PM
4

That's the attitude you develop when you don't have to work for it, you take it for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 09:07 PM
1

I’m on dating apps specifically because men never approach in real life, so your claim that women don’t need dating apps because they get approached in real life all the time is false. Your personal anecdotes mean nothing. Just because YOU don't get approached doesn't mean other women don't. If what you were trying to claim was true at all then dating app gender ratios wouldn't be so lopsided.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 07:56 AM
1

Where is your evidence that women CONSTANTLY get approached on Facebook and Instagram? again you resort to exaggerating. So you apparently you can't help yourself from using strawmen. Why can't you keep yourself from doing that? It makes all your arguments sound hysterical. Women get approached on fb and insta, women have literally talked about this. And don't demand evidence from me when all your evidence is "just trust me". Because I don’t know any woman who met a partner through Facebook or I…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 07:55 AM
6

t all the more obvious to me that we have to stop blaming women for the behavior of the men in their lives, because there LITERALLY aren’t enough good men to go around. If all women everywhere waited to have a relationship or baby with a genuinely great guy, like 75% of women would NEVER get married or have a child. Goddamn they are sexist as fuck. Take some accountability women. And if you want kids so fucking bad adopt. The world is overpopulated as is so stop adding to the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 07:31 AM
1

This formatting is terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 07:29 AM
2

Yes women do get approached on Facebook and instagram and IRL so they don't need to use dating apps. You're denying reality at this point. Having some random Indian guy messaging you asking you to marry them is not the privilege you think it is. Racist and a strawman. Good job. And in real life, most women don’t get approached nearly as often as you think they do. I’m attractive and I rarely get approached. Maybe it’s my country, but that’s my experience. Just because you don't get approached do…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 07:29 AM
1

Women don't need to use dating apps because they get approached enough through regular apps like Instagram and Facebook. And IRL. Whatever youre saying about dm's doesn't change this fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 06:19 AM
34

I tried to save the "best" ones for the OP but here are more from the video. in spite of being 50% of the population in fortun 500 companies women make up 8% of CEOs 92% of ceos may be men, but what percentage of men are ceos? jobs that are considered feminine like being a teacher being a nurse being an Nanny are all woefully underpaid while jobs that are considered masculine like being an engineer being a contractor being a business owner are all very well paid. What about the jobs that are con…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/25 03:01 AM
1

That's still the experience of most women. This being an exception for you personally don't change the fact its the norm for most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 02:29 AM
1

Sure thing. But the vast majority of women don't. And men do. Bumble tried to force women to message first and they gave up.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 02:27 AM
9

God forbid someone is self critical and holds themself accountable. Must be the patriarchy at it again.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/02/25 06:15 PM
2

Nope. someone speaking like that in the online spaces i've occupied would be run out for being a fucking edge lord. Sorry you had to deal with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 03:04 PM
1

Where is the data that men have lower standards than women? Here you go: https://i.imgur.com/VPKSEEm.png Now where is your data? You demand data of me without having any of your own? I’ve heard many stories from women who’ve slept with men only to find out later that the men have complained about some feature of their body behind their backs and even sometimes to their faces. You expect women to put up with that? What does this have to do with anything? Again, any sort of rating of attractivenes…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:56 PM
1

"I saw one survey" My sides. That's not how producing data works. Just because men swipe on every single woman they see on dating apps and would fuck any woman, doesn’t mean they’re attracted to those women Any sort of rating of attractiveness women rate men worse. end of story. Men will fuck animals ffs. So will women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:52 PM
1

But objectively, men have more physical preferences than women do. No, no they don't Show the data you have for this. Again, any sort of rating of attractiveness women rate men lower than vice versa. End of story. Its been repeated over and over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:46 PM
1

Well this scree you've been going on trying to say that men are more picky is false. Any sort of rating of attractiveness women rate men worse. end of story.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:45 PM
1

You keep bringing up this specific preference or that specific preference. it won't change reality. Women are way more picky. Any sort of rating system of attractiveness of men by women shows men scoring much lower overall than the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:41 PM
1

Stop pretending that men aren’t picky about women’s looks. Stop pretending that women aren't. and more so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:40 PM
1

They do show that. They don't show that. You can keep saying it but they won't make it true. Surveys show, repeatedly, that men find women more attractive overall than vice versa. These are all physical standards that men have. Men having physical preferences does not mean they have higher physical standards in their partners. I have not experienced all this unwanted attention while covered up so I can’t speak for those women. I'm not asking you to speak for them. I'm asking would you argue with…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:39 PM
1

Most surveys show men have high physical standards. No they don't. You can't just say shit and act like its true. I already told you my personal anecdote of men not paying attention to me if I’m covered up and they can’t see that I have big boobs. And I have already told you that you "personal anecdote" is meaningless. You're a single instance and we have no way to verify what you're saying. Even assuming what you're saying is true that doesn't disprove the trend. What is funnier is if i start u…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:26 PM
1

There's no way that all of those are women Didn't say all. Okay what about the gay rape sub with 100k members, or rape_Jav (already existing material), or misogynyfarm Okay what about rapefantasies with 1,237,627 members? When you go to the subs that target specific audiences those audiences willl be... specific. Any sort of rigorous data about this shows that women are more likely to have rape fantasies, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:22 PM
1

Women also don’t demand men be tall or have big penises. Yeah women do. Basically if you look at any sort of rigorous data about this women have higher physical standards for mates than men do. End of story.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:20 PM
3

literal rape fetish subs on reddit where men fantasize about committing SA and nobody cares You're complaining about the minority participants.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:07 PM
3

literal rape fetish subs on reddit where men fantasize about committing SA and nobody cares You leave out the women posting pics of themselves talking about their own rape fantasies on those subs. Rape fantasies are something women typically indulge in.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 02:00 PM
0

But at the same time men are still encouraged to sexualize women though. Women sexualize themselves. This is not a passive thing that "just happens" to women. Women take specific steps to make themselves more sexually appealing in their society. Women in the west will say their low cut shirts to show of the cleavage is because "its hot outside" but explain lengthening your neck with brass rings. So it's seems like most people don't care about women showing off their bodies, More and more guys ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 01:47 PM
2

Men have higher physical standards than women. Yeah nah. Data shows this isn't true. If you’re demanding women have shaved pussies and small labia, you don’t have low standards. That's a poor showing of logic. A preference isn't a demand. So you're already straw manning what men actually want. Your own personal experience doesn't prove anything. We're talking in generalities here and the generality is men find more women attractive than vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 01:40 PM
1

Not that I'm aware of. When I yanked my friend out i put him in the back of my car and left. This was a college party at a house off campus where we didn't know many of the people.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/02/25 06:03 PM
2

women's crying should be treated with same derision that men having libidos gets. control your emotions ladies
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 09:36 PM
–

Right, but its women's personal experience. That doesn't mean because you personally experienced something different that the trend doesn't apply to the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 09:15 PM
–

People, especially the younger generation, see trans women as women Doesn't mean they want to date those women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:46 PM
–

She could get it. FabulousHorror is also built nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:45 PM
–

Every time someone uses the fact they're an exception to a well established trend to try and discredit a generality, take a shot. Say goodbye to liver. "women are like this" "well I'm not like that so your argument is wrong"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:44 PM
–

did the covid vaccines work? yes. people really don't have long term memories any more. I would watch the news nightly and hospitals were on the verge of collapse, patients in make-shift tents, out the halls, etc. And the people clogging the hospitals and were near death, vast majority of them unvaccinated. Death rates followed political party affiliation which is wild because viruses have no concept of political parties but due to conservative leaning people being more vaccine hesitant they die…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:41 PM
5

edit: found it https://np.reddit.com/r/meirl/comments/1iq3soh/meirl/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:24 PM
1

I went looking for it as well but Reddit's search is garbage.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:16 PM
13

There was a post just this week where a woman was commenting that her male friend was attracted to pretty much most women his age in decent shape and she was amazed at how it seemed to be a healthy outlook on women and dating. That's what men want in women. edit: found it https://np.reddit.com/r/meirl/comments/1iq3soh/meirl/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:57 PM
19

When interacting out in greater reddit, don't "feminism" or "feminists" and go after the specific things feminism does. For instance you can point out how the sub devoted to the subject will not allow men to speak about issues that affect them so it in effect silences men. In other words treat the words feminists and feminism as trigger words to get you banned. Figure out ways to state your issues without using those words as much as possible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 09:04 PM
12

I literally pulled my half unconscious friend out of a car as he was about to be raped. He was a little guy and looked young for his age. Was pass out drunk. The woman was almost literally twice his size.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/02/25 12:30 AM
1

You sat there, and told me over, and over the only reason I'm against DEI is because I'm white WHEN YOU DON'T EXPLAIN YOUR REASONING FOR SOMETHING THE OTHER PERSON GETS TO DECIDE FOR THEMSELF. I asked you SEVEN TIMES to state why you were again DEI and you played hide the ball. It took you I don't know how many replies until you brought up you immutable/mutable argument. and when I pointed out that I'm nonbinary, your only response is telling me "You don't see how dei helps Nonbinary people!". N…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/25 03:25 AM
1

Dude, you absolutely did come at me for my gender. Prove it. Quote me. You can keep saying this, doesn't make it true. I have to be real, it makes complete sense to me that someone that supports bigoted policies is actually willing to attack someone for their gender. The policies attempt to combat bigotry. The irony is you view them as racist because your race wouldn't be discriminated against but you miss the fact your nonbinary status would be discriminated against. Thus the cutting your nose …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 03:29 AM
1

Your actions show otherwise man. No my actions do not. Show me where I've attacked you FOR your gender/sex. Me going after your beliefs on dei/aa is NOT going after your sex/gender. I'm going after you for your hypocrisy and racism. That's a deceitful conflation. Are you telling me that if you got in a personal argument with an enby person, and they walked away from you, you'd walk up to them in another conversation, and start confronting them "How can you feel that way if you're enby?". Because…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 01:12 AM
26

Being the stoic emotional rock for example Damn that's a good one. Its very draining to be emotionally available for your SO and let them vent to you, etc etc knowing you can't do the same. Here are some videos where this sort of thing is discussed. Men Aren't Given That Safe Space To Be Vulnerable Without Being Judged 2:05 How to deal with a sensitive man in a relationship 1:30 Why some men struggle to communicate inside a relationship 1:30 The truth about providing a "safe space" for men to be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 05:19 PM
1

This person is lying. They are referring to me. We were talking about aa/dei and they said: Last time I told a dude I was against affirmative action his response was "You only think that because you're white". and I asked why they were against dei/aa and the reply was: Why am I against racial based hiring practices? And so that started our conversation back and forth. Nothing to do with their sex or gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 05:06 PM
1

Dude you following me from post to post attacking me for my gender is harassment I've never attacked you for your gender/sex. I fully support you being nonbinary and have stated that support before. Correct yourself on that. I personally think you're making this a hostile sub for LGBTQ+. I personally think you're making this a hostile sub for POC. You described The hypocrisy of this is incredible considering the topic you're harassing me is about DEI, and you're sitting here attacking a minority…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 05:03 PM
11

So much of what you say is relevant. I've dealt with other nonbinary people on this sub who have racial hangups about dei/aa policies while they miss all the ways those policies will provide protection for their nonbinary status. I agree that focusing on men's issues and leaving race out of it is the smarter plan. I feel like there's some folks in here that don't realize that racial discrimination has generational effects, just like class discrimination. I grew up poor. So even if my resume remo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:44 PM
33

i know that killing can't be justified in anyway Ehhh. I try to avoid absolutes when possible, there's usually an edge case that can prove the absolute doesn't hold up. There are LOTS of cases where killing can be justified and those justifications have been used as successful defenses in trials.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:36 PM
1

Don't claim you're being harassed and acting like you didn't say something you did because it wasn't in this comment chain and there won't be a problem. And don't attempt to criticize someone for something you're doing worse, that's projection.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:33 PM
1

I don't see the relevance in "in this comment chain". And you're the one going in circles about that. You keep projecting what you're doing onto me. Again, those are your words. Me quoting your statements on this subreddit back to you is not harassment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:28 PM
1

But where in this comment chain? Reread my comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:25 PM
1

I already linked to where you said it. Those are you words.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:23 PM
1

What is your question.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:20 PM
1

Sorry? That's a different post. So first you recognize those words and statement as something you said. So all this time you keep asking "where in this comment chain" like it makes any sort of difference. Plus you know you had me blocked for a while so I couldn't reply to you. So yes, you did say that. Don't act like you didn't. That's deceitful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:19 PM
35

I suppose a man could bring up things that occur more often. But if a person thinks about things more often where does it cross from emotional labor into self created anxiety or neuroticism? Its not like a man only thinks of things that need to be done once a week. That shit is every day.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:17 PM
1

This you? https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1ie9qeh/trump_has_basically_made_it_impossible_to_be/maygwfh/ Show me where in this comment chain I did. Again, that's not what I asked. You keep referring to this comment chain. I'm asking are you saying you've never said that, which means beyond this comment chain.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:15 PM
3

Im curious how this sub will react to this. Marco Rubio is not a left leaning politician at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 03:05 PM
33

I agree OP. The man listing out his own mental list of things he has going in his head is effective. This also makes me think of "honey do" list where women will capitalize on men's time with work list the women want done without regard to how difficult the work might be. and why she kept asking him to do more and more trivial/easy chores. Relationships require labor. Women use household chores and "emotional labor" as a tool to control men's behavior. But they never bring up the romance labor. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 02:48 PM
-1

Please show me exactly where in this comment thread I said this, and I'll revoke my claims of harassment. Are you saying you never said that? Edit: Yes they said this. Here's proof: https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1ie9qeh/trump_has_basically_made_it_impossible_to_be/maygwfh You can "claim" harassment all you want, doesn't make it true. We're both members of this subreddit so I have no duty not to reply to you and I'm free to reply to you as much as I want. Please stop cha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 02:44 PM
1

I just wanted to articulate that I HAVE explained my position very simply, I explained it in my first comment, the one you replied to, and you've actually acknowledged my position in your original comment: No you haven't and now you're full out lying. I asked you what you didn't like aa/dei and you just asked another question. You've never said a declarative statement on your issues with aa/dei. Don't lie about this. But hell, maybe i've missed it, so I'll give you a 4th chance. What are your is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 02:42 PM
3

Fully agreed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 07:38 PM
6

I understand the idea of using an extreme example to find where the limit of an idea is. I'm pretty sure that Laura Bates doesn't want to exterminate a race of people. But then again how would any of us know unless someone reads it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 07:36 PM
1

Here's hoping you find the man for you
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:20 PM
24

if someone is privileged then fairness feels like you’re taking something away from them. SUPER agreed. What does it say that when women identify as the oppressed class but some of the things they complain about in gender relations we men would welcome. in other words, how oppressed are they really in some situations if the oppressor would welcome the same treatment?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 07:11 PM
23

How is it possible that you people are LeftWing but do not believe in Patriarchy ? Its not that I don't believe in it, see for example the attack on women's reproduction rights. But "the patriarchy" is used in practice to stop examination of gender issues, misplace actual causes, etc. The classic example is that when men criticize feminism and some issues men face, women blame the patriarchy, then say that feminism fights against the patriarchy. The sleight of hand they pull by doing that is the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 07:04 PM
-3

I agree but the amount of rightwing male advocates lurking in here who argue in bad faith become tiring after a while.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:39 PM
1

I'd appreciate it if you didn't stalk my comments. I'm free to participate in this sub just as you. If you don't want to be questioned on what you post then you're going to have not post. None of us have the privilege of stating our opinions expecting to be free from critical examination from others. Dude you can't even accurately describe my position, and reduced it down to "Hey! You both disagree with racial stuff" You won't describe your position. I asked you multiple times and you played coy…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:38 PM
1

I actually expect you to explain yourself, yeah. How many times did I ask you to explain yourself? You're wanting to hold me to standard you're not willing to meet yourself. And I did explain myself, twice now. You're ignoring the explanation. If you can't understand that very simple explanation that's not because I didn't explain it. You're ignoring what's in front of your face to pretend to be ignorant. Dude you can't even accurately describe my position, and reduced it down to "Hey! You both …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:36 PM
-6

Third is that I'm nonbinary, and in my opinion, the entire point of personal liberty is self expression, and the entire point of equality is to recognize people are equals beyond their immutable qualities like race, gender, religion, sex. Coming up with socio-economic reasons to treat people differently on their immutable qualities is just bigotry. Do you consider bigotry if people don't consider you an equal based on the fact you're non-binary?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:34 PM
2

You should never, ever allow other people to tell you what you should be. Ehhh. I try to avoid absolutes when possible, there's usually an edge case that can prove the absolute doesn't hold up. For instance what if you've become hateful in your viewpoints? Your friends who care about you shouldn't say something to pull you out of it? Yes, they should.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:31 PM
26

I do think its important to read the detractors opinions and positions less our position becomes an echo chamber. But I agree you can't only read the detractors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:30 PM
1

And where exactly does it say we have the same hangups? In the comment you just replied to. Don't play dumb now. You had racial hang ups in regards to AA/DEI. They had racial hang ups in regards to AA/DEI. Thus, you have the same hangups. You can't in good faith be confused by that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:28 PM
1

ME: Why are you against AA? You: Why am I against racial based hiring practices? The post: Dozens of female Republican officials have been fired by the Trump Association's anti-DEI policies are complaining that Trump's firings where supposed to be according to race, not gender. They have the same racial based hangups with DEI/AA as you do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:19 PM
0

I mean, it goes both ways. The MRA movement hasnt done a good job of keeping far right influences out either. Just look at the top posts and comments of arr/MRA, its riddled with rightwing talking points that are mostly upvoted. If we do decide on a new title to work under we'll need be very vigilent in policing it to remove bad actors on the right that inted to co-opt the movement to their own ends, and also those who want to discredit mens rights activism by saying purposefully inflamatory thi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:16 PM
1

https://old.reddit.com/r/LeopardsAteMyFace/comments/1ih6cru/female_republican_officials_finding_out_they_are/ Thought this was relevant to your worldview.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 02:42 PM
2

Right. Or if you don't join in the prayer at work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 02:23 PM
1

https://www.instagram.com/hotinjuba/p/CzBqFACqZnj/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 01:31 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62UzLgdb1GQ
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 01:30 AM
1

I wish I could bring him and Patrice O'Neal back.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 01:28 AM
–

What does that prove? It explains that. I have entertained ugly and rich men. It doesn’t mean I was truly attracted to them. Your personal anecdote is meaningless when discussing data and generalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 12:43 AM
-1

Tesla not reporting income taxes did absolutely fuck all to me or anyone else in a direct manner. It really does and being willfully ignorant about it doesn't change the fact it does. But like I said, that dude who got denied a job he was qualified for and watched 21 women walk into it with less qualification and capability, that shit resonates with people. Strawmen do resonate with those who are prone to conspiratorial thinking yes. I think a big problem with the modern left is they've become s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 12:41 AM
-1

Why do unattractive redpillers believe that they will magically become attractive once they get older? Starting off with a strawman, typical. No amount of exercise will make an old ugly attractive. Go to r/glowups. but money doesn’t buy genuine attraction https://np.reddit.com/r/science/comments/7my58a/females_are_four_times_more_sensitive_than_males/ oh and this https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/j80vle/women_are_1000x_more_sensitive_than_men_to/
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 12:35 AM
1

Yeah that's just rambling at this point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 12:32 AM
2

But not the DNC. They kicked Sanders to the curb, twice. Yes and I'm still pissed about that. So switch party to one that cares, that one obviously does not. The US doesn't have a left wing party. So our choices are either center right or fascists. So yes, the DNC sucks and the Dems come up short but that's no justification to go the conservatives or Republicans.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 12:31 AM
1

They never left. The robber barons is both sides of the uniparty. In this ersatz of democracy. Oh there it is, "both sides". Its like saying "any dog can bite". I would much rather face a pom than a mastiff. One side is most definitely worse than the other. Where's the right's Bernie Sanders?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 12:29 AM
2

In states that aren't 'at will' All 50 states are at-will. And AA was never to eliminate discrimination "Affirmative action is defined by OFCCP regulations as the obligation on the part of the contractor to take action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, or status as a protected veteran." it increased it by giving ammo to the notio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 12:28 AM
0

DEI absolutely makes it harder for working class people. The "owner class" has existed since the inception of capitalism, whether they make it harder or not is irrelevant to this discussion since they're a constant. The RICH makes it harder for working class people. IF you argue that then you're not a leftist. Its not DEI taking away your paid family leave or keep yours wages low. The robbers barons are back and the very people they are robbing are helping them because they're mad at DEI, the ne…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 12:18 AM
2

They could just do blind name no photo CV. This ignores social and class mobility in the US. How poverty gets passed along generations, etc etc. https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/reports/segregation-and-resource-inequality-between-americas-school-districts/executive-summary/ Otherwise the rich kid that went to the private schools and colleges are generally speaking, going to have the better looking resume, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 12:15 AM
2

No, its not legal to do that. What's stopping it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 12:09 AM
-6

Its jsut as racist to look at any poc and KNOW that they absolutely faced historical discrimination and need support today as it is to look at a white person and KNOW they absolutely do not. And thats what DEI does. No, the racism and discrimination that POC have experienced in the US is in no way comparable, what an insane take. Am I on r/conservative? Lots of anger that POC got given some extra consideration. Never forget Apple fired a black woman Cheif Diversity officer for making the followi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 12:05 AM
1

They "counteract" it by making it harder for regular working class people not part of DEI-favouring groups. Nah that's the owner class of this country making it harder for working class people. Its not leftist voting against people's right to collectively bargain for instance. Leftist are far more likely to support universal healthcare. The left ... decided to believe that 100% of white men are evil capitalist imperialist oppressors right wing populism, because those have people who have the aud…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 11:57 PM
4

To be what, a priest? Is this a serious question?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 09:45 PM
3

I actually didn't self identify as a white person. Ok identified by another person as white in your op. Man, with all do respect, the only reason you don't understand my point of view right now is because you can't see your own internalized biases, you can't help but see everything through the lens of racial classes. What is your point of view? You don't get say anything about why i cant or can understand your point of view because you refuse to state your point of view. you can't help but see e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 06:44 PM
-11

I'm thinking of situations of where its been implied "i don't deserve the things I have". To me, bitter women talking about "mediocre white men" and giving historically discriminated people a chance are not the same thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 05:17 PM
-21

There's a difference between giving a chance and making up for historical wrongs. That's where I personally draw the line. If you want to make up for historical wrongs, but you're basically putting all the cost of that largely on people just starting to find their way in the world, how is that going to be perceived? But those things aren't in the past. They're not "historical", they're still happening now and will continue to carry forward. So much of where you'll get in life depends on where yo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 04:56 PM
4

Both sides have rejected science in different ways. Different ways sure. but not nearly in the same magnitude or extent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 04:52 PM
8

The "Left" has rejected science Compared to the right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 04:36 PM
5

That's the problem, "did". We don't now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 04:25 PM
-5

It’s never fair to shaft people due to their immutable characteristics. That's what DEI and AA try to counteract, not cause. These things were created as a response to the fact that people are discriminated against due to their immutable characteristics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 04:22 PM
8

Remember, giving people of color an opportunity is so outrageous that the counterbalance to it is a plunge into right wing oligarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 04:21 PM
4

The reason Trump can go so far right is because he's counterbalancing something that's gone too far left. There's not been something "so far left" to justify our racing towards right-wing oligarchal authoritarian takeover. Life is going to get worse for the vast majority of us and you think this a counterbalance because there was a policy that tried to be more fair in giving people opportunities?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 04:20 PM
8

I wish we could better separate racial issues and gender issues. My white privilege, yea I believe it. Male privilege? Not so much. Agreed
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 04:06 PM
42

So, criticizing the implementation of these things has always been kind of suicide from the left. I'd actually go as far as to say that's one of the big reasons for Trump's rise. Agreed. This sort of thing doesn't necessarily benefit me directly but it does benefit those around me. And what happens when I get old. Or people start saying you have to be Christian to be hired. etc etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 04:05 PM
9

This post is rich in irony is all i can say. A redditor with a username that identifies them as nonbinary is bitching about AA because they feel its racist. Now with AA being done away with it will be legal to discriminate against them based on sex and gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 04:04 PM
3

Yes, the self identified white person's complaint against AA is that its racist. The irony being if you're truly nonbinary, now that AA is being done away with, you'll be able to be discriminated against. That's unfortunate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 04:01 PM
4

Leftists with power turned DEI into a total joke by applying it in a clearly unfair and sexist manner. To what extent was this actually done though? I'm aware of the push to get women into stem and the college attendance rates, etc. But it seems that certain posters are upset about the gender imbalance that DEI created while other (white) posters are really, really upset that AA helped POC some. And now you have reactionary backlash to it. Trump can easily destroy every single part related to DE…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 03:59 PM
1

How silly of me to focus on the overt racism. Over everything else that AA addresses? Seems like the person you brought up had a point. So far you're only complaint with AA has been the race portion of it and since as you say, you're white, that seems to be the reason why you don't like AA addresses inequities in hiring based on race. That's what I'm left to conclude because you cowardly refuse to state your actual reasons.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 03:52 PM
1

you appear either incredibly disingenuous or incredibly racist 1st, AA doesn't only focus on race. "Affirmative action is defined by OFCCP regulations as the obligation on the part of the contractor to take action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, or status as a protected veteran." So when someone's objections to only deal with r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 03:45 PM
2

I think the implication of your statement that I might be interpreted badly if I don't explain myself is a bit of a threat, yes. How is that a threat? What are you being threatened with? Don't be vague and it won't be an issue. when I can just point out the overt racism? Because that's not all that AA addresses, but that is what you're focusing on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 03:39 PM
4

I'll edit this to reply more in depth later but I do want to say I appreciate you can come out and state your issues with DEI instead of hiding behind coy statements and answering questions with questions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 03:18 PM
-3

Is saying "Those two statements together don't look great." a threat to you? You still refuse to say why you're against AA. Are you that afraid to stand on your principles you refuse to state them out in the open? Because the truth is you're the one pushing racist policy So you feel AA is racist policy?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 03:12 PM
7

Another conversation I'm having in this post is proving your point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 02:49 PM
-10

I'm actually curious what implications you're drawing based on my statements. Let's hear it. Or you could just say it. Why are you against AA?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 02:46 PM
1

I'm actually curious what implications you're drawing based on my statements. Let's hear it. I already said. You're replying to it. Are you going to state why you're against AA directly or just hint at it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 02:45 PM
-7

I'm giving you a chance to share your viewpoint on why you don't care for AA. So far you've responded with just asking a question. If I take Last time I told a dude I was against affirmative action his response was "You only think that because you're white". and Why am I against racial based hiring practices? and Because the truth is you're the one pushing racist policy not me buddy. Those statements together don't look great. But instead of leaving us to read between the lines why you could sta…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 02:36 PM
-8

Why are you against AA? Why am I against racial based hiring practices? "Affirmative action is defined by OFCCP regulations as the obligation on the part of the contractor to take action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, or status as a protected veteran." You seem to be focusing on one aspect in particular there. The fucked up pa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 02:31 PM
11

With post like these I do wonder how left leaning is this sub. For myself, DEI has not bothered me. I'm aware of study after study that shows you can take two people with the same qualifications the person with the "whiter" sounding name will get the call back, etc. I'm not upset with something being put in place to counter act this. A lot of things that people claim work off meritocracy really work on nepotism. I'm not mad there's something that lets people outside get a chance to get their foo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 02:23 PM
2

I'm well aware. I'm talking about your comment to the original comment's point. That's called a discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 09:16 PM
2

This reply of yours shows you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what i'm saying. read this again: If one side does it 100 times and the other side does it 1, its not really equivalent. Its like saying every dog can bite. Would much rather face an angry pom than a mastiff. People on ppd will act like an equivalent comment means equivalent frequency or magnitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 08:26 PM
1

:(
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:55 PM
3

Part of the issue is too many terminally online people seem to think that if 1 woman is lonely that means that "women will generally have an easier time finding a partner" can't be true. i personally dont care about invalidating someones experiences if theres truth to it. Same. its just funny that this original post had so little awareness. Reminds me of this, guy says that men can't open up about issues without it becoming about how the woman feels about it and the woman on the panel proceeds t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:51 PM
8

Women want the monopoly on victimhood. They don't like to be challenged for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:35 PM
3

This is like a rich person complaining about money problems to someone scrapping by. Better not invalidate their experience. You can say everyone suffers but some of us truly have it better than others and to act like everyone's problems are the same level of bad is just ignoring reality. You'd find people over and over in certain subs saying they watched the content to give them perspective and new found appreciation on what they had.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:32 PM
5

how is saying “well youre not TRULY lonely like i am since you could just do abc if you tried xyz” not invalidating? How is not reality? Its true that women generally can land a partner easier than the equivalent man. Why does it bother you so to point out there's a difference there?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:29 PM
6

If one side does it 100 times and the other side does it 1, its not really equivalent. Its like saying every dog can bite. Would much rather face an angry pom than a mastiff. There's no denying that women have an order of magnitude of greater choice in their partner compared to men. If they still end up with shitty partner are they not responsible for their choice at all? Especially with the way women are drawn to non empathetic assholes for a partner in a way that men aren't (to the degree that…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:27 PM
1

Women aren’t the ones claiming there’s a female loneliness and that the dating game is “too hard” "Where are all the good men?"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 03:36 PM
1

Chores this,chores that. Women love to bitch about men not doing their part in chores and then at the same time ask why the man doesn't take her out on date night anymore with no sense of irony. And no PPD women, if you "claim" you take your man out on date night it doesn't mean jack you bunch of lying unicorns.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 02:45 PM
2

This is sibling to people looking at those county vote maps and assuming an overwhelming majority of the country leans right when in actuality those counties are mostly empty and most people live in urban areas and lean left.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 02:42 PM
2

Anyone who ever said that the border was secure under Biden more than Trump is a moron Anyone making a value judgement off one person making it over is a moron really.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 02:39 PM
5

Women do a thing, its good. Men are found to do that same thing, its dependency, desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 02:38 PM
7

Women do that shit on the regular, but you find an example of a man doing it, better run to reddit about it. Same thing with all the relationship posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 02:36 PM
–

Yeah nah there’s been plenty of women who have been monsters behind the scenes as far as personality and how they treated others and have kept their jobs for years.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 11:17 PM
–

From popculturechat “You Fell For an Alleged Smear Campaign Against Blake Lively. Now What? It’s never been easier to destroy a woman’s reputation using the internet. In wake of the Blake Lively lawsuit, how should we engage?” Now women are starting to experience the monster they created with metoo. I’m all for the Weinstein’s or the Cosby’s of the world facing justice. But this monster of mobs trying to come for people’s jobs off word of mouth with no evidence is bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 11:08 PM
–

but remember, im saying if you have a great sex life and she finds you highly attractive That's the thing. She'll say all this. But there's a high chance her actions will change. And men want to avoid that. is it still an insult ? Insult or not, its a not a good sign the sex life will last long into the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 01:15 AM
–

These guys don't want to be stuck in dead bedroom situations after the mortgage and 2.4 kids come along.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 01:10 AM
–

What feels nonsensical is redditors saying you need to touch grass when you point out where having that many sexual partners at that age puts you relative to your peers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 01:09 AM
–

Body count discussion going down in askmenover30. The poster says she's 26f and has had 13 partners and her 28m didn't like that. I pointed out this puts her in the 89 percentile of her peers for life sexual partners and I'm eating the down votes because the data hurts people's feelings. https://np.reddit.com/r/AskMenOver30/comments/1hjmf06/my_bf_broke_up_with_me_because_of_my_body_count/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 12:55 AM
2

well are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 03:08 AM
6

women coming up with excuses of why they shouldn't have to pursue their man or initiate physical affection or romance.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 03:08 AM
6

It’s why I talk with couples about sexual priming, which allows the space for sexuality to not be siloed off in the relationship so people can feel desired and desirable but also that allows sexuality to exist in the relationship without expectation of sexual behavior from it. "honey i want to show that i desire you but exhibiting sexual behavior but don't you exhibit any sexual behavior in return". "That's why I talk to couples about chore priming. It allows space for the labor to not be siloed…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 02:31 AM
2

I hope they do
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 08:41 PM
1

not at all
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 04:14 PM
1

Just like when some right wing grifters tried to make this into a left wing thing and their audience turned on them and reminded them people on both sides of the isle are coming together over this. They don't want their culture war replaced with a class war.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 04:13 PM
1

all these followers of Abraham need to fuck off and leave the rest of us alone
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 08:48 PM
4

just this year i got nauseous and vomited while on a trip with friends. my woman friend, purely platonic, started giving me hell and turned toxic when i got sick. She made it very clear how much she was not going to provide any support to me, how i shouldn't complain to her, etc. women are just like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 08:47 PM
3

the earth gonna burn up soon anyways juice it out bruv
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 08:44 PM
2

this isn't directed at you but the sex that says "just be confident" and then absolutely can't publicly speak always struck me as funny. (generally speaking for the most part, exceptions etc.)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 09:37 PM
1

can you explain how that quote is misandrist? i’m just curious your perspective If a person says that "amazing" women are so common as to be a sea of them but then only one man out of many worth their standards then that's a clear bias. They're implicitly stating that they find women superior to men. Imagine that same observation made along racial or ethnic lines, but its ok to make it across gender lines? also , do you believe it’s transphobic to not want to date someone trans? slightly differe…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 09:14 PM
2

Hell has frozen over I agree with Lilith.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 01:32 AM
6

We've seen the video that gives us this quote: I definitely feel like because there's so few men that I would want to date around that the ones that exist completely get to pick. I feel like me and my single friends, we go to a party there's lucky if there's like one straight guy that we find attractive there in the sea of amazing women. You point out thats that's sexist and mildly misandrist and reddit brained people come back with I'm sorry - are you saying that not being sexually attracted to…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 01:25 AM
1

...by "here" was it meant on PPD? im assuming reddit. I was asking what kind of threats you were talking about. Like the one I quoted? I don't understand how you're confused by this. I also explained as: all you need to match the criteria of OP is some woman venting frustration with the world in a hyperbolic fashion due to men's nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:18 AM
1

current top 5 off the sad playlist please
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:10 AM
1

My original comment: I’ve never seen a woman here assert that women are going to burn down the world if men don’t comply with our desires… Clearly someone doesn't browse twox What do you need described there?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 05:03 AM
1

Im playing dominos against folks from the Caribbean. I am losing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 12:29 AM
1

Im playing dominos against folks from the Caribbean. I am losing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 12:28 AM
1

You did not. You referred to TwoX, but that’s not an explanation. Don't forget witchesvspatriarchy, everydaymisandry, tikitok etc. What am I not explaining? If you ignore all i say and try to summarize it as "you referred to twox" then youre engaging in bad faith, which I saw coming. This sort of thing you routinely do is why I didn't give you any examples Eulen. Its predictable with you when you're challenged.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 10:37 PM
1

I don’t use TikTok to start with. That doesn't change the fact you'll see many examples of what im talking on tiktok. your frequency of use of a website or service doesn't change whether or not that website or service contains examples what you're asking for. see, you're starting your spurious arguments again. If you aren’t interested in explaining your point, there’s no sense in this discussion. I have explained i just haven't provided examples. you're already doing what I said you would that's…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 10:25 PM
1

yeah and? i'm not taking the time go dig for examples just for you to come up with bad faith arguments to disregard them. its a waste of my time. if you really have a desire to see them you know where to look. go look on tiktok etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 10:10 PM
2

go to twox or similar feminine spaces and read long enough and you'll find an example as long as you don't have blinders on
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 09:53 PM
3

no one is confusing women saying they're opting out of dating or not having kids with what im referring too
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 09:38 PM
9

I’ve never seen a woman here assert that women are going to burn down the world if men don’t comply with our desires… Clearly someone doesn't browse twox
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 09:01 PM
1

I’ve never seen a woman here complain that men won’t lower their standards to date them. I have, you just got to browse the right sub reddits. I’ve never seen a woman here assert that women are going to burn down the world if men don’t comply with our desires… women say that pretty frequently. again, got to be on the right subs. seems your arguments are based on selection bias. What’s to “call out”? So women are always right? They never have a viewpoint that's fucked up? Those would be the thing…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 09:01 PM
2

I've haven't seen a ppd woman call out another ppd woman for her standards and seen a back and forth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 07:53 PM
8

I've come across a post I haven't seen in a while where a man is talking about being picky and how its making dating difficult for him. Of course people are jumping on him to "lower your standards". you hear women all the time how they only find some minority of men attractive, etc and their standards aren't criticized when they complain about "can't find a good man". Just one of those things™
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 04:42 PM
1

LOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLL
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 04:40 PM
1

i wouldn’t kiss or sexually touch a woman yeah yeah sure im talking about women in general though and women do that touch of gay. so many of them do causally make out and touch one another sexually cuz its not a big deal to them. cuz they a little gay. yours just manifest differently. men can admire or be jealous of other men's builds etc. we're not gonna have them as our background pic. you're not gonna hear a man say "it’s often a pic of a hot girl guy with great boobs pecs." guys just aren't …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:30 PM
1

im not sexually attracted to women. i just like the aesthetic of hot girls 🔥 yeah that's a little gay. that's part of the little gayness women do that men just don't. foshposh is gorgeous but probably not the aesthetic i tend to put up with Now im curious. can you elaborate? what about her aesthetic doesn't do it for you? i particularly like her face and skin tone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 05:05 PM
2

i was socializing at a friends house yesterday for thanksgiving. one of the ladies there i get along with took a selfie with me where she put her big ass titty on my shoulder in the pic. and its a nice titty. i like to think she was giving me a little gift for the holidays
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 05:01 PM
1

you know i don't know. men will have weird collections like a shelf of gamer mice or flash lights. but women's attraction in a partner is much more affected by perceptions of wealth then men's are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:59 PM
1

i used to work a job where i would help a lot of college aged young women setup their email on the phones/laptops etc. most of the time if i spotted them having a pic of themself as a background i would give them grief
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:58 PM
1

Are you bi at all? I assumed you were hetero but having a picture of a hot instagram for you background i'm not so sure now. and why a light skin? put foshposh on the background
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:56 PM
1

maam.. that's certified weird girl behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:31 PM
1

is your phone background a picture of you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:28 PM
1

you take spicy photos of yourself just for you to look at? WEIRD bro. and now you're being selfish
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:28 PM
1

great. leave everyone else alone
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:26 PM
1

Did that really happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:25 PM
1

Definite possibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:17 PM
1

There was no “or” there. She can show boobs and still be a lil narcissistic
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:17 PM
1

Much less physical effort
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:08 PM
1

Women are weird and a lil narcissistic. You even gonna share with us or keep them all to yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:08 PM
1

So, those people stop having sex you first
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:55 PM
1

you can just say high melanin individuals its ok
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:55 PM
1

you know what, he doubled down on it so you got me on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:54 PM
1

so by your own logic the big dick who don't "actually use their dicks" are bad at sex. damn tried to help you out but point out how to spot a logical fallacy in someone's rhetoric and you double down.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:53 PM
1

they can make themselves hot by wearing revealing clothes and makeup, bask in male attention. we both know this is common sense but the amount of women who will argue online that wearing revealing clothes and makeup is not them sexualizing themselves is ludicrous
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:51 PM
1

I mean he's admitting that it's true in the comments below, so that is indeed what he thinks. he didn't use the strawman, you did. lack of accountability for using fallacious thinking in your arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:49 PM
1

counterpoint: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8kk3jgXY-U
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:48 PM
1

Second, there’s zero chance,again, even if she was dissatisfied, that she would video chat about it when he was anywhere in the vicinity, awake or asleep. counterpoint: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8kk3jgXY-U
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:48 PM
1

nah man he baited you with a strawman. "Are you saying guys with big dicks are never bad at sex?" is an extreme. sure there are some big dicks guys bad at sex. but the more nuanced answer is that if you take 2 guys who fuck the same the guy with the bigger dick is more than likely going to be perceived at being better at sex. someone hits you with an absolute is already messing up
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:46 PM
1

are never gotta go straight to the strawman i see
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:44 PM
1

time to get good at eating the box and using toys
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:42 PM
1

let the gays have their fun
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:39 PM
3

yes
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 02:36 PM
2

i say skip library do a hike. perfect weather for it. hit some tourists spots like maybe a museum
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 02:36 PM
1

Yeah yeah men's libido but lets talk about women's thirst for external validation. Fucking selfie dump and rate my selfie keep hitting the front page and both those subs are usually women posting
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 02:33 PM
18

Yeah I've dealt with IPV from both of my partners and neither one of them shows up on any official statistics. So much of what women do to men during a relationship would be recognized as emotional abuse if done the other way around. Women's toxic behaviors don't get called out and often are excused in a way to avoid personal accountability for the woman. One thing that important to keep in mind for this subject is that domestic violence can include any violence that occurs in the home, includin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/24 06:50 PM
2

Lived their life a quarter mile at a time
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 09:30 PM
3

This is the first Christmas with my family that I just genuinely can't afford. I'm the one that buys everything, and ugh, it's making me feel a little sick that my husband and my dad could have no stocking and little to nothing under the tree. My son is covered because I'd sell my soul before he went without, but it's the smallest Christmas yet. At this point in my life I don't want gifts, I want memories. Maybe make cards for your husband and dad where you plan outings with them. Or a card for …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 09:06 PM
2

massive insecurity and over inflated ego. Damn that's rough.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 08:42 PM
2

These are the beauty standards that men hold Show me the men that are saying, "you don't have the hollywood beauty standard nose, I can't date you".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 08:41 PM
2

I could understand plastic surgery if you're having trouble with anyone finding you attractive but women typically don't have to deal with that, usually the opposite. Talk about massive insecurities.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 08:34 PM
3

There's a book that goes in depth on BPD. "I hate you! Don't leave me." is the name. BPD also has a fear of being abandoned so they will impulsively push people away and impulsively form relationships with people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 08:31 PM
1

BPD more often shows up in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 08:30 PM
1

thank you for the entertainment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 08:29 PM
1

LOL. See.... hysterical.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 07:14 PM
1

Im with you. Must be over 10 to fly. I find having a pair of ear plugs helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 07:10 PM
1

Defintion of expecation: a belief that someone will or should achieve something. So yes, its ok to expect a hug and its ok for that expectation not to be met. Don't overreact and be hysterical.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 07:05 PM
1

You're putting too much on the word "expectation". its literally the chances are higher than normal a thing might happen. Hugs are very low key. Calm down.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 06:58 PM
2

There was also the casual accusation of homosexuality thrown in as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 03:23 PM
2

That's weak af.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 03:21 PM
1

Can't come with you on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 03:21 PM
5

wild takes from reddit. Expecting to exchange a hug at the end of a date means you should get an escort for your entitlement to women's bodies. Note in this case all an expectation is is that the chances are higher than normal it might happen. Not a demand, not a requirement. Just like, "oh I'm expecting rain today".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 03:18 PM
9

Yeah they're not at the capital rioting. You've lost the plot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 10:09 AM
8

The same as the Jan 6 crowd? Delusional take.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 01:03 AM
1

oh then my mistake, carry on.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 11:32 PM
1

You seem to be implying that women can't be bad people...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 10:38 PM
1

You can call me trash but I still want universal healthcare and something done to address climate change or campaign finance reform.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 08:13 PM
1

Please stop
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 07:50 PM
1

Being polite is not caring to you? Come on bro. You answered it yourself. The fact you feel compelled to keep replying is what I'm referring to. Your actions continue to contradict what you say. If you were truly apathetic about this you would have stopped replying by now. As I'm going to. See ya
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 07:49 PM
2

Showing you still care when you say you don't. Just as full of crap as ever. But on par.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 07:29 PM
1

Everyone is always right about everything all the time, or wrong about everything? Ah the good ol strawman. Miss me with the logical fallacies bro. Of course you have to present some extreme example because it easier to attack. Who ever said anything about "everything all the time". just cause I doesn’t mean you don’t. What is this word salad. Are you stroking out here? Also wouldn’t it be impolite to not reply to your questions? oh so you're replying out of politeness LOLOLOLOL
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 06:21 PM
1

I’m not gonna remember later but it’s important to you, so here you go But you keep replying? If this wasn't important to you, you would have walked away by now. I called you on your bs. That's all this is. Mr. politics don't matter don't have consequences can finally admit they do. so all the times you argued otherwise you were wrong. Its sad you can't admit it but that's par for course for you. Looking forward to your continuing replies to show your apathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 06:18 PM
–

They do? I don't even know any woman besides me who uses Reddit lol Yes they do. You asked about men in general and now I'm replying about women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 06:09 PM
2

See, some people can go “huh, I guess it does” While at the same time go “look, Its better for me regardless!” So that means all those times you claimed it didn't you were wrong Mr. I don't care. How many times will you reply while not caring?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 06:08 PM
1

I thought you said you didn't care? Why are you still replying mr i don't care? What was the significance of football season then? So you bring up football as a reason for not caring and then the next reply you say you can't watch it? Ok so you care 6 days a week. That's a lot of care. Keep replying Mr. I don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 06:07 PM
2

Means I guess some people can grow. All the times you claimed politics don't affect people. You'll acknowledge the positive benefits to you but downplay the negative benefits to everyone and tell them that politics don't matter. Completely intellectually dishonest. Wouldn't expect anything less.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 06:04 PM
–

Same reason women go to men's subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 06:00 PM
1

Then go watch fucking football mr I don't care. Your actions speak much louder than your words. Lets see how many replies deep you'll go in your "i don't care"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:58 PM
1

The consequences are positively benefiting me. Oh no! Which is a different argument of "politics don't affect you, just vote and move on with your life". You were wrong about that but can't admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:57 PM
1

u/Lift_and_Lurk can finally acknowledge that politics have consequences. I guess people can grow.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:52 PM
1

You've said multiple times politics don't matter, doesn't affect people and here you are acknowledging how politics will affect gamers. Behold a man who claims politics doens't matter and then when confronted tries to change his stance to "politics don't matter to me" What? Her job? If she doesn’t America can vote her out in 4 years anyways. That’s how it works. Which is why people don’t really get emotional about political shit. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1ft0lsc/this_wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:52 PM
1

Its important to you too bruv. You keep replying. If you say its not important to you then I can claim the same. We're both engaged in the same shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:51 PM
1

And I don’t know you or at least remember you. So no I don’t remember in this context asking you for any sources. You ask me for sources all the time. You claiming "i don't remember" and you're trying to talk about excuses? Like if you got some sort of grudge, keep going I guess. This is hilarious for you to say because you will definitely go 30 replies deep anytime you get called on your BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:41 PM
2

That’s a lot of excuses not to provide a source no one asked for. There we go. The classic lift and lurk "excuses" line. Like a book i tells ya. Are you saying you never ask me for sources? Cuz we both know you do. You didn't this time cuz I called out your plays ahead of time. You did however go for your usual digs about lack of sources like I predicted. Because you're that predictable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:34 PM
–

I would try to plan something special, like some sort of trip or outing. Gift, a good meal and some cake.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:32 PM
–

as if men don't bitch and whine when you ask to use a condom That's the exact reason women should start using female condoms. To bypass this. But they won't...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:31 PM
1

I said multiple times it won’t affect guys like me. No, you said multiple times that politics don't matter, to other posters. Not "it won't affect guys like me".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:26 PM
1

Yeah at this point I'm starting to feel like lets step on the gas pedal of bad times so people can reap what they sowed.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:51 PM
2

You've said multiple times politics don't matter, doesn't affect people and here you are acknowledging how politics will affect gamers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:50 PM
2

I'm tempted to show this to my pops who relies on Social Security and see how he spins it. I'm sure he would say "the republicans are going to come up with something better" or some bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:49 PM
2

The sad part is its almost impossible to get these people to realize that the bad things they're experiencing is a direct consequence of who they voted for. My elderly father is complaining about how its too hot to work outside and my older brother had to skip days of work due to extreme heat and neither one of them want to believe climate change is real and is being driven by carbon emissions even though co2 has gone from like 280 ppm to 420 ppm in the last 100 years. That's just one.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:45 PM
11

Reddit admins saw a comment that said "I'm glad you got raped" aimed at a man and said "this doesn't violate our context guidelines" when that comment was reported. Absolutely allowed misandry. Here's the comment in question: https://np.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1e0fakt/the_comics_subreddit_is_having_a_bit_of_a/lcoed7w/ Try and report it and see what happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 04:08 PM
7

Reddit admins saw a comment that said "I'm glad you got raped" aimed at a man and said "this doesn't violate our context guidelines" when that comment was reported soooo. Its par for course. Here's the comment in question: https://np.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1e0fakt/the_comics_subreddit_is_having_a_bit_of_a/lcoed7w/ Try and report it and see what happens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 09:01 PM
1

He's about to be a Post-Palenstine muslim.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:05 PM
2

My brother said both Trump and Kamala are devils. Ah yes the classic "both sides are the same" centrist argument that shows incredible ignorance of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:02 PM
11

We can't expect pity and empathy. But we can inflict enough pain to explain that alienating men has negative consequences. Isn't that cutting our noses to spite our face? Cuz we're gonna feel that pain too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 07:45 PM
36

Yeah, at least Trump pretends to care about men That's not the win you think it is. Trump has pretended to care about a lot of people until he gets what he needs from them and screws them over. Where as left wing policies do benefit me even if not directly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 07:44 PM
15

Neither party cares about men's issues. Hopefully the democrats will see how they've disenfranchised men and will amend their stance. If one party favors more access to healthcare for everyone vs the other party then that party is in favor of "men's" issues as access to healthcare is an issue I as a man have. If one party favors more action to address climate change vs the other party then that party is in favor of "men's" issues as climate change will affect me as a man. I get that Dems don't a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 07:42 PM
26

What the gender breakdown of votes for R/D from 2020 to 2024? Anyone got that handy? In Georgia, preliminary results show Harris with a 7-point advantage with women over Trump: 53% support to Trump’s 46%. Compared to 2020 exit polls, Harris is running slightly behind Biden with women. Women went for Biden by 9 percentage points. Biden ultimately flipped the state blue for the first time in decades, eking out a narrow victory over Trump there by less than 12,000 votes. Trump has a 12-point advant…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 07:39 PM
1

I want to hear men explain how their lives will be better under Republicans/right wing rule.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 02:46 PM
2

I said first grade boys based on what? Where's your data on this? Sounds like your cherry picking a stat to make a point that doesn't exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 02:36 PM
1

Why dont you move to Afghanistan? I've just criticized Afghanistan's educational policies, why would you think I would want to move there?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 02:35 PM
1

This user you're replying to is claiming that the middle east is better at educating its population than the Netherlands and Germany when Afghanistan restricts half its population from attending school. Sooo that tells you where their belief system is at.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 02:34 PM
1

Are you going to leave me hanging? What about saving boys? Are they people too? Are girls people too? And its not like Afghanistan educates young boys better than the Netherlands or Germany.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 02:30 PM
2

That logic only works if you ignore young girls entirely. Tell me, what is the youth literacy rates for the Netherlands, Germany and Afghanistan? From what I see Afghanistan is 69.59 for males and 58.21 for everyone, male and female. Netherlands is 99.99. Germany is 99.99. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_youth_literacy_rate Or if you go by https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/literacy-rate-by-country Afghanistan 37.3% 52.1% 22.6% 2021 Germany 99% - - Netherlands …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 02:29 PM
2

Who do you think you will have a better life under? Trump or Harris?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 02:18 PM
0

Middle east takes better of their children and their education... The hell they do. Three years after the de facto authorities took power, Afghanistan stands out as the only country in the world where secondary and higher education is strictly forbidden to girls and women Guess what, girls and women are people too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 02:17 PM
27

I still want to address climate change, universal healthcare. Reforms to campaign finance laws, etc etc. I'm going to get that with any right wing parties.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 12:07 AM
1

Quote me your “first reply” and “seemed to agree” cuz I went back and read what I thought you’re referring to and I don’t see how you’re coming to that conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 10:52 PM
3

That's what happens when you don't have to work for it and it comes to you. But its anathema to women to acknowledge a privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:53 PM
4

brutal. and women want to complain porn isnt made with them as an audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:50 PM
5

absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:49 PM
2

You should be kissing MEN
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:47 PM
2

Those men are dumb as hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:46 PM
1

Its not a we thing. I've reiterated what the point I was making several times, if you're talking about something else that's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:44 PM
7

pretty much no one I see in public "does something" for me in a sexual sense, and on the rare occasion that has happened it's usually been a woman. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1fngtr1/this_will_always_be_posts_with_affirmative_claims/loiwz4a/ Hearing women talk about how they only find 0.001% of men attractive and then they gush about how the female form is so much more attractive bitch maybe you just gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:42 PM
1

Sure, but most likely I’m not going to reply to another person in my reply to you. No one asked you to do that. Returning to the topic of men touched starved by their partners, that’s something they have to talk about with their partners. If talking doesn’t help, it’s a break up imv. That's completely off topic at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:36 PM
6

we're all outliers in ppd, didn't you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:53 PM
1

So absolutely delusional over there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:36 PM
4

Agreed. What kills me is I can quote the academic study excerpts that back up what I say, still down votes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:35 PM
8

The irony of dropping well known truths in ppd in other relationship reddits and getting downvoted. In this case the classics of women's libido decreases in ltrs and men, generally speaking, have a higher libido than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:25 PM
1

Nah, I’ve read the original post as if it was about men struggling with dating. Hence, both my original replies were about it. Yes I'm aware. This particular fact wasn't in question so clarifying this makes no sense. I did misread your last comment though, I thought you were sending me parts of another user’s comment. I see that it was parts of your reply. I was. To show you that other people understood the idea without confusion. And to also show you that its possible to reply to other people, …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:24 PM
1

maybe not super models, and even then it depends. but other models are definitely thick. I remember the stick figure models chosen by other women meanwhile men were going crazy over Vida Guerra.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:35 AM
1

the idea is if you're a "top man" the playing field begins to even and so the criteria by which you judge women might change. The opposite of this is they say a woman who is a 4 on deployment with her squad overseas with the armed services becomes a 6 or 7 because she's one of the few women around, so she gets a stat bump. If you're a top man then the idea goes women who are 8's and above become more common in your social circle so their value drops some as they're not a rare, to that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:33 AM
2

I agree. It really not about her looks. Its just that she's the most well known actress at the moment with that archetype of look. so edgy people want to call her mid as though that makes them superior in some way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:29 AM
3

I've seen what happens when women are allowed to judge other women on looks. That how we ended up with the sickly thin androgynous super models in the 2000's. Meanwhile when men judge women on looks we got them thick. Assuming hetero men that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:28 AM
1

half the planet is asian. how you gonna "fetishize" the most common race their is? women are free to prefer other races than their own without being accused of being "fetishizing" but let a man do it...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:25 AM
1

degenerate druggys don't stop being bad influences once you're no longer a teen. They're always ready to accept you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:23 AM
1

what
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:21 AM
1

dammit you got me
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:20 AM
1

devils advocate: she didn't fall in love with the dude based on his character when he wasn't as attractive in high school Not that i agree that makes her shallow, i just imagine that would be the mindset of someone who does think her shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:19 AM
1

Well first of all, have you seen her mother? Pretty hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:17 AM
1

people in general have a nasty habit of thinking that pushing someone else down lifts them up. It doesn't. It's just crabs in a bucket after a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:16 AM
5

Women break rules and standards for Chad.. Here a concept that ppd's struggle with. If a person is in the middle of the bell curve, the part that applies to most people, then normal standards apply. However if the person has some sort of quality that places them on one of the extreme ends of the bell curve, attractiveness, wealth, libido, etc. that particular characteristic can be strong enough to overcome to rest of the criteria. It can go the opposite way too. Ask short guys or dudes with hear…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:14 AM
2

We're still up
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:09 AM
6

A ppd man in re: Margot Robbie She's mid to those of us that are top men. my sides
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:09 AM
3

She's mid to those of us that are top men. lol, lmao even.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:08 AM
1

most men don’t think that? It's this one op.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:07 AM
1

Link to someone saying Margot is mid on reddit and you'll see the comment downvoted to oblivion with other men telling that guy he's cooked, full of shit, incel, etc. This is the internet. Don't take trolls seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:05 AM
1

Mike Mentzer https://healthandvitalite.com/blogs/blogroll/mike-mentzers-old-school-most-productive-2-day-split-routine
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 08:02 AM
1

Eulen what you just said doesn't make sense on so many levels. 1) this is the daily chat thread. You can reply to any comment at any time. There's no restrictions on that. That's an arbitrary rule you've made up to impose on yourself to shield yourself from addressing the points brought up. 2) those replies are on the topic you and i are discussing. so if you don't feel like replying to those posters you could still address the point they made in our discussion. Really what's happened is you cha…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 07:59 AM
4

Stay off grindr. (common trope is for hetero women going on grindr to look for bi or pan men, messing things up for gay men)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 12:09 AM
1

The context in which the original post you responded to was clear. Either way it doesn't matter because as has been said, I say it usually ironically as a joke whenever I do say it, just because I think those people are ridiculous. Of course it’s not the same. And friendship is not a fix for the hole that a desire to be loved romantically will leave on your heart and spirit. it can ease some of the loneliness, but it’s not the same. and Women just don't understand we ain't gay like they are. No …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 12:05 AM
1

what would Men: we would like to receive romantic physical affection from our romantic partners Lead you to believe? the premise began with men with romantic partners, so which of those two choices do men with romantic partners fall into for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 11:33 PM
1

It's not that you can get romantic affection from your friends That's what the first post I made regarding this was talking about, romantic physical affection. Better than nothing imv. The premise was Men: we would like to receive romantic physical affection from our romantic partners So going to your "friends" to get it seems like a surefire way to lose your romantic partner and a nonviable solution. You yourself said When you’re monogamous, there’s only one person you can do it for. I can’t ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 11:26 PM
1

Its not about whether or not its your problem. you were just being purposely obtuse again.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 11:16 PM
1

Thank you, I agree completely. But these other people are being purposely obtuse like this is a hard concept for them to grasp when its basic common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 11:02 PM
1

So you would kiss your guy friend's foreheads, play with their hair? Hold them to your chest as they got sleepy? These are things you'd do for your "guy friends"?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 11:01 PM
2

/u/attendquoi seems to struggle with this idea and suggest that doing it for her guy platonic friends is exactly what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:58 PM
1

I thought it was because there was another damn huntsman in the house
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:31 PM
8

This is how either absolutely delusional and ignorant to the world some ppd women are or how much in bad faith they engage with everything. Men: we would like to receive romantic physical affection from our partners PPD woman: why don't you get your bros to kiss your forehead?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:29 PM
1

I'm assuming that's things you've done with your "platonic friends"? Heteromen are not going to go around and kiss their male friends on the forehead to give or receive romantic physical affection.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:27 PM
3

If you're not practiced with guns its alarmingly easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:25 PM
1

because they broke the agreement that was their marriage Tell me more about this agreement that is marriage. women break it all the time by no longer maintaining monogamy. At that point the man is not the first to break the monogamous agreement of marriage, the woman is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:23 PM
1

very spoopy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:21 PM
1

The second post is literally calling out that men deserve romantic physical affection. What you're referencing is not the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:21 PM
3

usually means a spirit is nearby
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:16 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/nottheonion/comments/1g9j3l1/woman_charged_with_reckless_homicide_after/ Wonder which twox poster this was.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:16 PM
2

That's a vibe I dig.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:13 PM
1

some men frame it
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:12 PM
2

and now for /u/OffTheRedSand's newest book "Nothing but Strawmen" available in paperback.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:11 PM
1

"romantic physical affection"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:10 PM
3

PPD Women: "best i can do is make a strawman about dry dick"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 09:29 PM
1

Oh well damn, carry on then. Usually I'm always asking guys why their so obsessed over virgins when they're not virgins themselves, reeks of insecurity to me. But one virgin desiring another virgin I get.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 09:25 PM
6

Trump, the pedophile rapist that wants to fuck his daughter? That guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 09:23 PM
1

There’s no equality. You just have to prove your value, some of course have it easier than others Unless its an area where women struggle in society, then we push to address it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 09:22 PM
2

Are you a virgin yourself? (weird I'm usually having to ask the guys this question)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 09:22 PM
3

https://np.reddit.com/r/Funnymemes/comments/1g9jxka/imagine_being_loved/ https://np.reddit.com/r/CuratedTumblr/comments/1g59vss/everybody_liked_that/ PPD Women: "best i can do is make a strawman about dry dick"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 09:20 PM
1

preach
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 12:17 AM
6

That's the difference in gender discussions online. Men will hold each other accountable in a way women don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 12:13 AM
3

Sex as female resource for social exchange is a pay that laid it all out.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 12:10 AM
1

Women want to pretend they love men despite only dating them for whatever resources they can extract. We can do this all day.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 12:10 AM
5

Because they're not as superior or doing as well as they claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 12:08 AM
1

That's what I meant by unicorn. These well established trends, ppd women seem to be exceptions to them way above the norm. And way back when you asked for examples I said you would argue the examples wouldn't count and golly gee seems like i nailed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 12:08 AM
2

so both genders are willing to date someone they don't see it working long term until they get to a point where they get what they want from the relationship. But for some reason this is an excuse women will use as justification on why they should never make the first move but the same reasoning doesn't apply to men because ~reasons~
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:56 PM
1

yes sex, a mutual exchange.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:54 PM
1

🫢
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:53 PM
1

There was a thread posted where women were asked if they would trade being seen as desirable and attractive for guaranteed safety from sexual assault. The majority of responses wouldn't give up being attractive for safety.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:52 PM
1

Isn't that literally obvious? The power is in the hands of men, not women. You want women make themselves ugly or something? Way to miss the point. The power is in the hands of a few people, not men. But again, if its a privilege women want, lets get society to address it. If its a privilege men want, those men are desperate, its their choice, etc etc. Being catcalled is not equal to pretty privilege at all. No one argued that. Average women get that just fine. That's part of my point. These wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:50 PM
1

but what if you were being an ass and had it coming? sometimes I'm an ass and I have it coming. Where's that Bill Burr bit about getting punched in the face is great for character growth.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:45 PM
1

oh in that case a woman in her maturity begins to approach the level of disregard a man has been dealing with since his teens. In other words, "welcome to the suck". (Jarhead reference)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:43 PM
1

Yeah but did she get a maternity test? What is she hiding?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:42 PM
5

women want to pretend that women won't date a guy for the food and entertainment even though she's not interested. Women will brag about doing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:41 PM
4

How many women get called incels as a pejorative relative to men?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:40 PM
2

Most women will not go through the torture of being with a man they can’t stand just for some free food. That's cap. Women absolutely all the time use men for meals and entertainment that they're not interested in. To act like they wouldn't is comical. We all know men are less picky and more desperate which is why approaching as a woman is risky if you want a mutual-interest relationship. Approaching as a man is risky too. Both sides have their risk. it sure is funny listening to the gender that…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:38 PM
3

Stop talking as though there is an unknown third group of people who are choosing to give attention to women and not men. That's clearly not the case. Men are the ones who choose to and even force their attention towards women in general. They can collectively just decide to stop doing that. Yes lets frame every privilege women bitch about not having as a matter of choice on their part that's honest. the type of attention women receive from men is not exactly something women want anyway. yeah th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:35 PM
1

She is hot. Not hot enough sounds like. Approaching as a woman is also a bad idea. Approaching as a man is also a bad idea. Men will go along with that just for the sake of sleeping with a woman, even if they’re not truly interested. Women will go along with that just for free dates, gifts, etc with a man, even if they're not truly interested. I’d never encourage a woman I care about to do that. Yup, a push for equality and equity until its one of your privileges challenged and now we're back to…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:25 PM
3

Women would definitely be the majority users if dating apps were solely geared towards commitment and a monogamous relationship, even if it wasn't necessarily tied to religious values. nah, they wouldnt
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:17 PM
3

wasn't paying attention where i was on comment level. i agree with u.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:16 PM
3

Turns out your friend isn't that hot, and needs to start approaching people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:15 PM
5

I think these are a type of white knight. its a good thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:13 PM
1

I got a great deal on a bridge i can sell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:12 PM
1

those men aren't complaining about those women being degenerate because those women are desired.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:11 PM
5

Yeah and that means men to stop being so desperate the dry dick response again. Yeah how dare men want to experience a privilege women have. Those men are just desperate. Is this what we need to tell women when they complain about privileges they feel men have? stop being so desperate?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:09 PM
5

What do you guys think the reasons for this? Lying
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:07 PM
1

so women who use dating apps are degenerates to you? tells me all i need to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:05 PM
10

and I can think of a couple of ppd dudes who's whole persona is to act like they're above all this, better than all the other dudes, and definitely don't care until you challenge them and then they do care, very much.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:03 PM
1

selection bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:01 PM
3

bingo we have a winner. Basically no matter what is between your legs if you're counting on being approached and you're not being approached... you got work to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:59 AM
1

Because being desired is usually defined as “women opening their legs for me without commitment” by most of these men. ah the old "dry dick" strawman again. PPD women can't grasp that men want this: https://np.reddit.com/r/CuratedTumblr/comments/1g59vss/everybody_liked_that/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:58 AM
1

Im sure you would
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:32 AM
5

"I work with a guy who's 25, a virgin, and he never gets asked out or has any romantic prospects. He doesn't use the apps. He's often in public places like the library and restaurants, yet no women approach him. He's physically attractive so that's not a factor." Geez I wonder where this guy is going wrong in his approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:31 AM
1

Not the men here complaining… they’re focused on low value women on dating apps who sleep around. That's bullshit but keep telling yourself that. Why would men strive to be like these women rather than the many good women who take dating seriously/want marriage? This question really doesn't make sense. Again men do long to be desired and to experience dating and the plethora of choices your typical woman has. That's not that hard to understand. I work with a girl who’s 25, a virgin and she never…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:30 AM
5

The difference in advice a woman who struggles in dating gets versus a man is pretty eye opening too. The man is immediately asked things that requires him to accountable, such as how much time in the gym, what program, how much progress, etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:19 AM
5

There is where psychology experiments that test self reported results are so fascinating. Here was have what a person says and here we have what that same person did.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:17 AM
4

You shouldnt expect others to care about your problems Caring about other's problems is how a functional society that benefits most operates. Today its them, tomorrow its me. Funny how this statement is used when its man complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:15 AM
3

They do. What point are you trying to make here?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:13 AM
1

I mean apps like tinder. That was very obviously a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:06 AM
1

In a time when we push for equality and equity men do long to be desired and to experience dating and the plethora of choices your typical woman has. This is the area where the push for equality disappears and we're back to traditional gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:06 AM
1

if by dating apps you mean doordash... maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 10:32 AM
3

Nobody really talks about the struggling men. lol. lmao even.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 10:25 AM
5

PPD Women: "best i can do is make a strawman about dry dick"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 10:24 AM
1

and combine that with how medicine is all designed around and tested on men and not women. This part i'm pretty sure has been debunked.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 07:43 AM
1

"women do not make strategic decisions based on future projections" that's bullshit. Don't underestimate women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 08:03 PM
2

Got strong lower class vibes. Its crazy when you can see someone's social class in their genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 08:01 PM
1

I didn’t say it bothered me. Seems you got defensive over an observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 01:49 AM
1

I can't help but notice and laugh when the guys do the eye reveals its literally just their eyes that I've seen so far but you've manage to get some cleavage in with your eye reveal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 01:31 AM
1

I dunno why so many people who tout eugenics seem to ignore hybrid vigor.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 01:29 AM
3

lol gottem. and by "em" i mean us.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 01:28 AM
1

replace confidence with halo effect. the action is perceived different based on how attractive the person doing it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 01:23 AM
2

Aw yes, the gender that odds favor and traditionally does everything possible to avoid shooting their shot says this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 01:22 AM
2

ive been sayin...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:34 PM
1

🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:31 PM
1

psychedelics may help
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 03:24 PM
1

Please do because they won't show what you think they will. youre delusional at this point
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 03:23 PM
1

You've seen what I'm talking about. So often ppd women's go to retort is to strawman men's complaint about lack of companionship, romance, being desired, etc down to "you just can't get your dick wet". And thus, if it was just an issue of getting sex, then getting sex from a "sex with an unwilling but tolerating it partner" would be the solution. But as you just said, "People who think that having sex with an unwilling but tolerating it partner is okay aren't people who I'd want to hang out with…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:19 AM
1

People who think that having sex with an unwilling but tolerating it partner is okay aren't people who I'd want to hang out with. Thus you recognize all the retorts ppd women about "getting your dick wet" or "dry dick" are in incredibly bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:08 AM
1

Do you have a link? I already addressed this/debunked this complaint. Yes, where the links to the comments appear. You literally can't click that link and not see the link to the comments. So you can't say you weren't provided links so you now you're crying you didn't get the links exactly how you wanted. You're now displaying youre bad faith asking for evidence in full force. If you really gave a shit about the evidence, then all that would matter is that you got the evidence. You wouldn't be c…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:52 AM
1

Yes, where the links to the comments appear. You literally can't click that link and not see the link to the comments. So you can't say you weren't provided links so you now you're crying you didn't get the links exactly how you wanted. You're now displaying youre bad faith asking for evidence in full force. If you really gave a shit about the evidence, then all that would matter is that you got the evidence. You wouldn't be crying about clicking a link requires you to look down ONE LEVEL at the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 02:07 AM
1

wtf. i can fully believe this happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 01:21 AM
2

Leg press is a show off exercise. Full range of movement with weight you can control. Load at the stretched portion of the movement is most important.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:06 AM
1

I hope she cooks cuz Indian food is great.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:05 AM
2

them: "you didn't provide links" Me: "yes I did, you saw them and commented on them, remember?" them: "Oh I hope they click on your links!" You can't make this up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:04 AM
1

LOL please show them this. "so no links" "you mean the ones you clicked on?" "yeah those links!" you're so full of it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:00 AM
1

But there are links. you saw them and commented on them remember? I guess youll leave that part out huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:59 PM
2

No no, the topic in hand isn’t random! I didn't say "the topic in hand". Your retorts are what I was referring to. Next time any asks why no one takes men’s issues seriously I can just use this as example of what “Mano-fenders” are doing as why. Please do because they won't show what you think they will.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:38 PM
2

The thing that’s not really salty is irrelevant because ? Yes the amount of time you perceived it took me to find that is irrelevant. And who says it’s a win? Ohhh you don’t actually care about men’s suicide rates and empathy, this is more important! I see: continue! And now I see we're resorting to random bs to see what sticks.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 09:35 PM
3

This particular ppd'er is notorious for this. They once asked for proof that society had changed in the last decade. Do I need to prove the linear progression of time my guy? But I provided him some links and because some aspects of life had gotten better and some aspects of life had gotten worse, this ppd'er tried to claim that meant that the evidence presented supported my stance that society had changed. Can't make this shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 09:18 PM
6

Notice how all the blame is on the man and none on the woman. Removing women's agency yet again.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 09:17 PM
2

It’s been longer than five minutes. Nah it took me five minutes to find. Now how long it took for you to find is a different story. Plus it irrelevant. At the end of the day you wanted evidence. There's your evidence. Did you accept it? Nope. Did you cede the point? Nope. Did I call out this is exactly what you would do ahead of time? Yep. But I AM glad you allowed me to be able to show what dudes here call “salt” That up there is salty to PPD! This is a laughable attempt at "nuh uh I won". You …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 09:15 PM
1

I called out a ppd'er asking for evidence in bad faith because I knew when presented with any evidence they would dismiss it on the bullshit grounds while at the same time refusing to provide any evidence to back up their position. They did just that. To the letter.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 09:01 PM
2

Fuck, you got me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:59 PM
3

Cause it took you that long to find nothing. It took me like 5 minutes. And again, its not nothing. I knew you were asking evidence in bad faith and you reacted just how I said you would when presented with evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:59 PM
1

Its so funny when you can call out what a ppd'er will do ahead of time and then they do it to the letter. 📕
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:51 PM
2

And there's the bad faith pay off for you asking for evidence. You did exactly what I said you would do. Here I'll quote me. And we both know you're asking in bad faith. We both know any evidence presented to you, you wouldn't cede the point, you would argue how the evidence doesn't count. Meanwhile giving nothing to support your side. You completely ignored where I said Granted, this is from a 5 minute search. This is no where near the sum of the evidence out there. Read you like a book.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:46 PM
2

I think that desirability, romance, and sex are one and the same. Disagree. Women want to be desirable and have people desire them even when they don't want to fuck the person desiring them. Also, people want to be desired by their partners. If sex = desirability then people would use escorts and prostitutes more. But that doesn't fill the void for the majority of people. If you mention wanting to be desired what you’re referring to is sex Speaking for me, it would make my day if a woman let me …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:44 PM
1

No your reply was not to drop links. Well you can't say the links aren't there because they're a direct reply to the OP. If you can't find them that's on you. And please miss me with the childish "hurr if they were there you would link them" because 1) I did link them, just one level up, and 2) they have a timestamp on them to show how long they've been there and 3) every time you've tried that argument with me I've been able to produce the goods. Here, since you're having such difficulties. Her…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:34 PM
1

No your reply was not to drop links. Well you can't say the links aren't there because they're a direct reply to the OP. If you can't find them that's on you. And please miss me with the childish "hurr if they were there you would link them" because 1) I did link them, just one level up, and 2) they have a timestamp on them to show how long they've been there and 3) every time you've tried that argument with me I've been able to produce the goods.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:32 PM
1

i lead you astray. I would edit your post before someone reports you. that's on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:31 PM
1

what are YOU talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:25 PM
1

Right, and my reply with the links are in that conversation so you have context for them. You're right its not just the ladies who are salty but talk about projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:25 PM
2

This person for president.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:22 PM
1

TIL: The invincible ignorance fallacy, also known as argument by pigheadedness, is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given. Tag your favorite ppd poster.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:22 PM
1

You're ignoring the links I provided now? lolol ok buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:20 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1g08aa5/this_will_always_be_posts_with_affirmative_claims/lr9n8p6/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:15 PM
1

That’s a lot of accusations. Not a single link. There's links. And we both know you're asking in bad faith. We both know any evidence presented to you, you wouldn't cede the point, you would argue how the evidence doesn't count. Meanwhile giving nothing to support your side.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 08:00 PM
1

I’m saying most the time when someone asks for links the person who has them drops them. For some reason that’s not happening here. Yes it has. But what instead we have the whole “oh I’m gonna play gotcha” like it’s Maury. That's your game. You ask for evidence in bad faith. First you ask for evidence for things that are well known to happen implying that the phenomena doesn't happen, when you can't show that at all. Then when evidence is given to you, you will argue the most wild bad faith take…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:49 PM
1

No I’m not sure, that’s why asked in the first place Nah that's not why you asked in the first place. what am I saying is, you're saying there's no links now. Are you sure that there aren't any links now? And you still won't answer the question of if you would accept the evidence if it was presented. Because you're asking for this in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:37 PM
–

As a Halloween liker and spooky season enjoyer I will not take this incursion by Christmasers. It hasn't even been Thanksgiving yet and there's already Christmas stuff out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:32 PM
–

good leaves more for me
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:30 PM
1

If evidence was provided, any at all would you cede the point? LOL you dodged the fuck out of that. Yeah you're asking for evidence in bad faith lolol. But no links. Are you sure about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:29 PM
–

Wtf is going on with this post? Why are so many comments here treating these data like some kind of competition, like men is somehow "winning" or "better at this" than women? https://np.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/1drssuw/comment/layoysf/ For the ppd'er acting like this doesn't happen. edit: more There's 2 parties, people treating it like a competition and then the other side acting like this is proof that men are the most oppressed individuals... It's really not a competition, nor som…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:25 PM
1

If neither side has evidence that means it’s not real. You get that right? That's the thing. For the one side to say it happens, they only have to be right one time. For the other side to say it doesn't happen, they have to be right every time the situation occurs. Now then, don't bitch about one side not providing any evidence when you haven't provided evidence. Strongest evidence wins. If evidence was provided, any at all would you cede the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:23 PM
–

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uf8bt6fGQyA Why Therapy Sucks For Men A male therapist goes into some of the downsides of men seeking therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:20 PM
1

Wtf is going on with this post? Why are so many comments here treating these data like some kind of competition, like men is somehow "winning" or "better at this" than women? https://np.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/1drssuw/comment/layoysf/ For the ppd'er acting like this doesn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:17 PM
–

Bruh people in relationships give the most hardcore line in the sand advice to single people all the time. Don't tell me how you wouldn't put up with such and such or you would just be single from the comfort of your decade+ cohabitation with an ideal partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:12 PM
–

There’s no evidence tho. That's right, you don't have any evidence though. So maybe the whole thing is made up? The likely of it never happening, not even once, is astronomical. Plus you're asking of evidence in bad faith. If you were presented with some you would immediately argue why it doesn't count or some BS while all the time never presenting any evidence to support your stance. The asymmetrical demand for evidence is a bullshitters favorite tactic. Make them do work while not having to do…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:10 PM
–

Same thing as video games. Anything that competes for a man's time and attention that isn't their job stands a chance at annoying her. But at the same time if he has NO friends and she's his only social outlet that's bad too.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:04 PM
–

That’s not how it works. If you are gonna claim something you got to be prepared to have the recipes to back it. There's no rules. Whoever has the strongest evidence wins. You made a claim, defend your claim. If you can't then don't demand the other person defend their claim. Plus they only have to be right one time. You have to be right EVERY time. People don’t go around having to prove to their insurance companies that their car isnt on fire all day We aren't car insurance in here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 07:02 PM
–

This "hehe but you won't die without" response people have is pure semantics Yeah really all you "NEED" to not die is to be a brain in a jar with oxygen and nutrients but we all know what a hellish existence that would be. Thus arguing on needs based on what is only necessary to keep a person alive is dumb af. Usually the people who make these arguments are emotionally stunted and are permanently acting in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 06:59 PM
–

Given how a certain demographic of women weaponized 911 to control other minority men's behavior who is really telling on themselves. The term Karen is a thing for a reason. What was all the things women called 911 on men for again? -bird watching -having a bbq -selling water -lying about being groped The list goes on and on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 06:58 PM
–

I dunno, we should have some links to show they are if they are tho. Dats why I’m asking How about some links to show that they aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 06:53 PM
–

Yeah I've seen research articles state something like 66% of relationships the pair started off as friends first. then either a) you just wanted sex the whole time because you're male or b) you're ruining a good friendship Oh man to see women try to retroactively change a man's motivation for doing things because he caught feelings. He goes from being a good friend to a master years long manipulator all because he has the audacity of being human.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 06:52 PM
–

Dibs I found her first
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 06:38 PM
–

apparently i wasn't. My story goes I struck up conversation with this good looking girl at Dragon Con and she offered me her number. We went on 3 dates, she said she wanted to take it slow which didn't bother me but her reaction on the 3rd date to me leaning in to kiss her told me I was not the guy for her so I gave it 2 days to see if she would call (nope). On day 3 I called and it was a mutual ending of things. If she wanted to be friends I told her upfront what my intentions were at the end o…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 06:21 PM
–

Oh goddamn! That's turbofucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 06:13 PM
–

I just went through this. Do what I did and break it off. I wasn't That Guy for her, your not That Guy for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 06:10 PM
–

Major baddie https://imgur.com/a/ex7Ivdz
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 06:07 PM
–

They don't?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 05:39 PM
–

Yeah for most women its the wedding itself they look forward to and care about, not so much who they're marrying. If women could rent a dude to stand in as the groom (and not get judged) so they could have their dream weddings they would do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 05:32 PM
–

Yeah the reverse halo effect for men is a real mother. Two men can do the same actions, but how acceptable or liked the actions is affected by how attractive the man is. That's why women got pissed when men were asking what are the "rules" for interacting with women during metoo. They knew that's there's multiple sets of rules, one for the hot guys, one for regular guys. And then the undesirable guys they wanted removed from society in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 03:24 PM
2

Can't say I've witnessed anything from women like I have experienced from men. We know it happens though. Sounds like selection bias at play. One person's personal anecdotes don't disprove the phenomena exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 03:21 PM
–

The classic strawman of equating men complaining about a lack of human companionship, romantic love, and being desired by a partner = dry dick/can't get laid. And these same women want to claim men have fucked up views on love and relationships. Should call it PPD's Law. Once you mention dry dick you lose the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 03:13 PM
2

I'd say the vast majority of guys are. You just really gotta get to know them. They come off decent and normal, and then BAM, some out of pocket fucked up shit comes out of their mouth. That's people in general. Women do this too. Hell women will do this loud and proud and its more accepted.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 03:05 PM
5

If he's just whining about not getting laid There's that classic strawman ppd women love to use.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 03:03 PM
–

Some women are too. The one's who can't get sex on command like normal women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 03:00 PM
–

Or "online dating isn't real life"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:35 PM
1

"OLD isn't real life!" meanwhile: https://np.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1fzqgvk/how_couples_met_19302024
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:34 PM
–

A bunch of closeted gay dudes date women first I mean I don’t know what else to tell you This is a two things can be true situation. Yes there are closeted gay men as well as closeted gay women. I'm sure the rates between those two groups are different as well. This is true. Its also true that women suggesting to homosexuality to heterosexual men is invalidating to homosexual men who have to deal with the stigma that their lifestyle is a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:32 PM
–

Who is saying it’s a choice though? That’s your own assumption When women suggests to heterosexual men to resort to homosexuality to address their dating problems those women are implying its a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:26 PM
–

I don't think women get offended when told "you should try dating women" as much as men do when told the same. Women are more prone to dipping in the gay then men are. This is also a form of misandry actually. I agree. Its also lowkey homophobic because homosexuals will say its not a choice for them. Where as people against homosexuality will claim its a choice and thus they try to use conversion therapy against homosexuals. So every time a woman casually suggests "hey you should just be gay" is…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:04 PM
1

Actually, it was for condoms period. Of either kind. Serves to prove that mixing male condoms into the real world example drastically improves chances of the contraception working successfully. So its correct that female condoms are very close in effectiveness in male condoms. I'm correct in that. To perhaps 1% of men, yes. So the responsibility falls to them. I already stated this. Displaying more of your ignorance of male condoms. You remember that part where I said PEOPLE should utilise male …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 02:00 PM
–

i have to agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 01:39 PM
–

You could always date women. I know ppd women love to suggest homosexuality as a solution to men's issues with women. Lets see if what's good for the goose works here.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 01:38 PM
–

Medical organisations That link states that Internal condoms are up to 95% effective at preventing pregnancy if you use them correctly every time you have sex. and If not used correctly they’re 79% effective, which means around 1 in 5 women who use internal condoms for a year will get pregnant. The second link states: In real world use, about 15 in every 100 people a year who use condoms as contraception become pregnant (85% effective). This is due to incorrect use, condoms bursting, or slipping…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 01:32 PM
–

When people talk about personal anecdotes if you want to use a personal anecdote to illustrate why you feel a certain way, great. If you want to use a personal anecdote to illustrate a different point of view. awesome. If you want to use a personal anecdote to show an exception to trend, that's also good. If you want to use a personal anecdote to argue a trend isn't true or disprove data, nah. Nope. Again, with the anonymity of the internet there's no way to verify any of us aren't lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:52 PM
–

Can I recommend some fiber in this trying time. That usually helps to curb my appetite.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:45 PM
–

But guys here want their personal anecdotes taken seriously, but want to scoff at other people’s anecdotes. Let me do an impression how a lot of certain ppd posters would argue this if they were men "Well men's anecdotes are better and more truthful and women just care about getting CUM DUMPED IN THEM. Women only want to get their pussies wet so why should we care about ANYTHING they say?"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:43 PM
–

Ah yes, you'd much rather use "studies" that rely on self-reporting For some of this stuff the studies that rely on self-reporting is the best we got. But that still under goes more rigor than what people say on here. By your own logic this is a perfectly reasonable statement. How is that by my own logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:40 PM
–

The prevalence of lines like "well he doesn't have to know about it" begs to differ. Nope, men do not have pre-selection bias like women do. But then, you've proven a few times today that you have no interest in being realistic. Kinda droll, really. Are we making things... personal?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:33 PM
–

And your argument is like saying "Why don't we use parasols when we skydive?" No, female condoms are not that inferior to male condoms. And you'd rather jump with no chute at all? Internal condoms (female condoms) are a form of contraception. They prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and pregnancy. If used correctly and consistently, internal condoms are 95% effective. The real solution is for PEOPLE to carry male condoms What if the condom you have isn't the right size for him? Better…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:30 PM
–

Men do it all the time, too. Men do not display a particular attraction to taken women like women do for taken men. This is a phenomena particular to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:26 PM
–

Personal experiences are data, too. No. No they're not. Especially in PPD. We have no way to know if someone is lying out of their ass or not so they're meaningless for arguing against data or trends.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:22 PM
–

That's like arguing to jump out of a plane with one parachute. "I'm not going to wear my seat belt, I'm just going to rely on the person driving not to wreck". Maybe because they're more expensive, less effective, more awkward to use, and basically inferior to male condoms by every possible metric. Given the number of accidental pregnancies in the US its apparent that when male condoms aren't available people resort to pull out. And given how much women say that pregnancy affects them more than …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:21 PM
–

Generalizations based on data is not that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:11 PM
–

Women just like taken men and this is how they try to rationalize to themselves its ok to pursue taken men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:09 PM
–

You ever notice you never see women with female condoms? edit: Internal condoms (female condoms) are a form of contraception. They prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and pregnancy. If used correctly and consistently, internal condoms are 95% effective. Pulling out isn't a very reliable way to prevent pregnancy. It works about 78% of the time
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:08 PM
–

As opposed to believing people's personal anecdotes?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:07 PM
2

Nah there's been some of us who are left leaning that were bitching about how bad Biden's mental state was.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:06 PM
–

They want to act like it’s logical to generalize women, but when you make the argument to generalize men, then they wanna act like victims. The "you" in this case almost always uses strawman to attempt to generalize.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 12:03 PM
1

single women looking for a relationship are roughly three times as likely as men to say they wouldn’t consider a relationship with someone who makes significantly less money than them (24% vs. 7%). And how many of those marriages have female breadwinners?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 09:13 PM
1

one of them who?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 08:58 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/1fz87yn/to_be_young_in_love_and_entitled/ You love to see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 08:46 PM
-4

Nah I am. I'm da best. Around.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 08:38 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/ThatsInsane/comments/1fyzy3m/people_in_canada_chant_death_to_canada/ There's seems to be a certain demographic of people who seems to be consistently unhappy with the countries they emigrate to. Perhaps they should consider staying home.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 08:37 PM
-8

Yes it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 08:36 PM
-7

How do you know you're the better catch for her? From how much she bitches about her exes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 08:17 PM
1

To touch on what you said earlier I also find it interesting to think about all the criticism that transwomen get. Is it misogny or is it misandry?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 07:55 PM
1

I find FTM trans perspective very interesting. Especially when they deal with the culture shock.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 07:38 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1fymk9h/this_will_always_be_posts_with_affirmative_claims/lqziiew/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 07:34 PM
3

I agree with you. People think outliers disprove the trend entirely. Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 07:32 PM
5

Many trans men who have transitioned fully have wives and girlfriends. Ha what percentage?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 07:28 PM
1

There's no way you're just coming to this realization as I stated as much before you asked for examples. that you might believe are universal. Not universal. Strong, yes. But not universal.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 07:25 PM
–

https://np.reddit.com/r/PoliticalHumor/comments/1fyzxh3/both_sides_are_equally_bad
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 06:13 PM
–

"its men's fault for not trying to date these women because they don't know if the women will reject them unless they try" but then later "well how can you blame these women for not dating these men because those women know the men won't love them". Just another day on ppd.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 05:50 PM
–

Queue up every "its not women's responsibility to ..." response ever given here in PPD for that person to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 05:48 PM
–

Same goes with pissing on the floor.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 05:44 PM
7

If you tell yourself someone won’t date you without even asking them, you’re preemptively rejecting yourself— the woman isn’t doing it, you are Women loudly and often proclaim this preference. Research shows the stats as well. We know women feel this way because women themselves say it. assert that women deliberately avoid men who are younger because they know that men will not love them, because men care so much about youth and beauty. I'm stopping here. You can't at one time say men are reject…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 05:43 PM
1

First of all, your claim is really broad bound to have a lot of "unicorns" not fitting it. It isn't just PPD - that's statistics. Again, you were wanting examples of what I was talking about when referencing these "unicorns". not the nature of them. See I knew at the time and I should have said that if I provided the examples you were wanting you would argue in some way how they don't "count" like you're doing now. The point I made then still stands: Remember fellas, every ppd woman is the unico…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 05:29 PM
–

Ok 75+.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 04:21 PM
–

Adding to the population is not an answer. We're already using resources far faster than earth can replace them. Why make that problem worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 04:18 PM
–

the decreasing fertility rates. Fake problem. Populations need to shrink now before climate change shrinks them for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 04:05 PM
–

Monica is not a solid 10. I can't really picture a solid 10. She's a solid 9 though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 04:02 PM
3

Trends and populations in general are all fine as long as it isn’t “ALL PEOPLE ARE LIKE THIS AND IF YOU AREN’T YOU’RE LYING”. You're not really engaging in the "ppd'ers are unicorns" comment I made earlier in which you asked for examples. Your comment deals more with trends vs anecdotes. Also, to the income discussion almost half of marriages in the US do not have a male breadwinner making more than 60% of their shared income. The states are 55 percent are male sole earner or primary. 29 percent…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 04:01 PM
–

I win, politics loses again Actually the opposite. This attitude is why the US lags behind in worker protections, healthcare, etc that so much of the rest of the world has because of this attitude right here. This is how the powerful want you to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 03:48 PM
–

No it doesn't. Oh it definitely does. Politics is counting on your ignorance and non participation to further take advantage of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 03:46 PM
6

That’s what we’re here for us to each give her opinion. My opinion counts it’s only one but it does. My friends have different wants and needs, however none of them who have money seek a man with money. Enough to support himself the rest… Except any of the data that tries to look into these things with any sort of rigor don't support this "preference". And I could just as easily say that "my friends ..." and state the opposite. Thus we cancel each other out.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 03:45 PM
–

You may not care about politics but politics cares about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 03:43 PM
–

I'd tell her "you're allowed to have an opinion but if you can't rationalize why you hold that opinion then that's a different issue". Its still crazy that people want to vote for the incestious, pedofile rapist who probably sold out our spies to Putin. That's just the tip of the iceberg with this guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 03:42 PM
–

A dog's sexual orientation does not affect its potential bite force or ability to injure/maim a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 03:39 PM
4

The things you listed out for you personally is what I'm referring to as personal anecdote.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 03:38 PM
–

Yes they may both engage in similar behaviors but not nearly at the same rate or degree. Its like equating being bitten by a pomerianian vs a kangal.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 03:25 PM
7

Women's personal anecdotes are pretty meaningless in all this. I prefer to discuss trends and populations in general. Its well known that PPD is full of exceptional unicorns in all this. /u/eulenwatcher here's another example for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 03:21 PM
6

If men just “know” this and only date out women they look down on out of their belief, how would any woman prove otherwise? Can you rephrase this. I don't know what you mean by "date out women". And don’t blame it all on women I edited my post to make it more clear I was speaking in generalities instead of absolutes. but it’s also true men value youth and looks far more than they value success and wealth in women Yes men value youth and looks its true. But as others have said the reason success …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 03:19 PM
7

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlier
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 01:55 PM
–

no u
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 01:54 PM
2

Explain Rihanna and Julia Roberts then. What about them?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 01:53 PM
2

To be honest though, I don't understand your thought process. Why does it have to be either or instead of neither? I'm pointing to one of the places that women do have privilege in life, especially compared to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 01:52 PM
–

https://np.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/1fywa11/my_34f_husband_32m_of_9_years_said_im_too_loose/ Have fun with this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 01:41 PM
31

Why don't the majority of straight men, when describing their ideal women, list character traits such as success, wealth, confidence, competence, authority, power or status? Because men know that women (ppd edit: generally speaking for the most part, there will be some exceptions) don't date down. So if a woman meets these characteristics she's going to be looking to date up which means some 1%er that a regular guy is more than likely not. Really these women are actively hostile towards the typi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 12:56 PM
3

Women don't want to admit it but male attention is something they crave and they're entirely used to getting in abundance. So when they don't get male attention it feels like an affront to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 12:50 PM
–

it's a big one I've just been thinking I definitely feel like because there's so few like men that I would want to date around. that they the ones that exist like completely get to pick. like I feel like me and my single friends are like we go to a party there's like it lucky if there's like one straight guy that like we find attractive there and the Sea of like amazing women. So the vast majority of men suck and the vast majority of women are amazing and this isn't malignant narcissism with mis…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 12:49 PM
–

Curious why you would to rely on someone else's summation of the video rather than watching/listening to it for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 12:47 PM
1

FAW. I genuinely feel for some of those women. But the place is great for confirming regular women are full of shit when it comes to external validation, the male gaze, sexual attention, etc. because you can hear from a group of women who don't get any of that and what they say straight from the source.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 12:37 PM
5

Look at that creepy 24 year old woman preying on that man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 12:34 PM
4

Queue up every "its not women's responsibility to ..." response ever given here in PPD for that person to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 12:33 PM
1

Yeah that shit sucks. Georgia reversed the ban for like a week and now its back.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 12:30 PM
1

When you say "you are like this" that is personal. At this point this trolling on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 12:56 PM
2

You: saying I'm like men is a personal attack!!! No it wasn't men. It a specific group with specific characteristics. Also you: lmao u stoopid I'm not wimminz I didn't say that. people like you (impersonal) just love to play the victim. See, another personal attack. At this point with you having made 5 or 10 so far this has to be going into the territory of harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 12:37 PM
1

Many seem incapable of separating themselves from their demographics, Its not a fact of separating myself from my demographics. You made direct comparisons between me and the group. people like you (impersonal) have always proven to be somehow immune to irony. That's actually personal. When you compare ME to a group, that's a personal statement about me. The comparison is. You get that right. You are saying "you are like this" that is a personal statement about me. In this case, the this is a gr…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 12:35 PM
1

People like you (disingenuous mooks who only argue in bad faith and hypocritically only try to counter generalisations when a woman makes them about men despite the overwhelmingly larger number of similar posts from men making such generalisations about women) are just too obvious with it. Yeah that's another personal attack you did there. You: Oh, I'm sorry ma'am Also you: larger number of similar posts from men (like you)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 12:28 PM
1

People from my country have an inferiority complex to Western people due to lasting effects of colonialism. Coupled that with weak English and a lack of Social cues mean they speak in this weird autistic way trying to appease/impress you but just end up turning off everybody. I get that. Here's what I'm getting at. One time I was joking with a Nigerian coworker about Nigerian email scams and they cried racism. I then pointed to my Kenyan coworkers and pointed out how what I said doesn't apply to…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 12:26 PM
2

Oh no no, I wasn't comparing you to a group. I just got done replying to you where you were most definitely comparing me to a group.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 12:23 PM
3

no need to take it so personally when I talk about people like you. Another example of making things personal. Once you compare ME to the group, you've made it personal. for men like you See, you've done it again. Making the comparison isn't some sort of sneaky getting around the rules exploit. That's still making things personal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 12:21 PM
2

Again, when you compare me to a group, that is making it personal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 12:19 PM
1

He's your stereotypical Indian call centre guy that all the racist jokes are based on. Its not the guy's race, its his country. Those same jokes don't work if the guy is from Bangladesh, Nepal etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 12:08 PM
2

Talking about a group, somehow a personal issue for you. You: Tonnes of men like you
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 12:04 PM
2

Neuro-biology of trans-sexuality : Prof. Robert Sapolsky https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QScpDGqwsQ
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 11:33 AM
2

Extra pickles on combo #1 I cannot abide. At least get a spicy if you going for pickles.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 11:07 AM
3

I'm pretty sure he's just a troll account anyways. Yup, still not getting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 11:05 AM
3

Tonnes of men like you Still having trouble with concept of "don't make it personal" i see.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 11:05 AM
3

SOLUTION: Men get to ask for a DNA test as long as the GF/wife gets to randomly check his phone/tablet/computer and check that’s he not abusing the child. Yup strawman. If you wanted to be honest it would have been this: Solution: Men/Women get to ask for a DNA test as long as both the bf/husband and gf/wife gets to randomly check each other's phone/tablet/computer and check they're not cheating or abusing the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 11:04 AM
1

Yes, people like you who argue only when this kind of thing is posted from the opposite camp. That's not personal, it's observational. Yes, people like you That's not personal Yes, people like you You sure about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/24 10:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter