TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

johni643636 Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by johni643636 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You just wrote an absurd ignore claim without any argument or explanation why, while my argument is clear and you threw it out of the quote (regardless of gender / nation / religion / race) and that is the part that explains emphasis creates basis for radical ideologies of gender, race, nation, religion.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 01:07 PM
-1

Because most of the victims of these men perpetrators are actually men, thereby nullifying gender as the basis for the relevant identification and representation of someone as a victim or perpetrator. The point is that the criminal is the criminal and the victim the victim, regardless of gender / nation / religion / race, and that MRA movements and radical feminists are both wrong when they do this in their limited and one-way representation of men and women, in order to score cheap points with …
/r/MensRights09/06/21 06:37 AM
1

a coherent argument Again a wrong biased setting, there is no “coherent, this way or that way” argument, there is only an argument or nothing else. What I have stated are stats and facts, so an argument.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:05 PM
1

Anonymity has nothing to do with cowardice you moron, but when someone loses arguments and then tries to attack a person with a "fallacious argumentum ad hominem" like you did now. Well, that's an example of a pathetic coward, like you are
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:40 PM
1

I totally agree that this is pretty poorly represented in public when it comes to raping men by women. Now on the point, can you find statistics on how many women raped men in the war in Bosnia, I hope you are not a mindless idiot and that you will enclose facts and stats to prove how wrong I am about rape during the war in Bosnia,
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:42 AM
1

Only a pathetic internet coward like you can say that, unlike these men, whose sacrifice in such a horrible situation is not forgotten
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:23 AM
-2

indeed. And if given the choice, they would rather save a woman from murder than one from rape. However, they'd rather let a man die than a woman be raped. It's pretty telling of their valuation of life. Man's life= bug's life. Woman's life = human life. Freaking moron, thats what you are. "Lets save all lives of men, and let all the women be raped." Pathethic coward, which mindset dont understand that it is better to die than to be tortured in this way. Obviously you have no idea that there hav…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:15 AM
-1

He also conveniently leaves out how many men might have very well been raped or sodomized before their murder/execution Your literal and limited understanding led you to such a conclusion you troll. Of course, men also suffered and were tortured, but here there was talk of the direct death of a man or torture by rape to the death of a woman, as can be seen from the OP, in which this was intended to be minimized.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:11 AM
1

biology shows that you can have one man impregnate ten women at the same time but not ten men impregnate one woman at the same time shows how idiotic your thinking is. You are an moron if you think that this is how the society really works, just stop it, you are embarrassing
/r/MensRights07/06/21 03:54 AM
0

Completely incorrect: To all the men who were killed in the camps, unarmed, fighting, etc. or a monument was made to them, they are posthumous winners of the highest war recognitions, there are anniversaries of remembrance, many documentaries have been made, their status is recognized by the state and gives their surviving families certain advantages and benefits
/r/MensRights07/06/21 03:18 AM
-3

"The man poses a physical danger to the perpetrators both because of his fighting ability and because of his reproductive ability." That's nonsense. It is women who were raped to reproduce with the enemy. Nobody cares about the reproducing ability of men, only one is enough, and nobody knows the real father anyway. The fighting ability is non existent when there are no weapon. Damn, can you even use your brain before posting this. i can't believe i have to reply to so many of nonsense, you are a…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 03:11 AM
-1

Women who commit war criminals go unnoticed by absurd ideologues like you The war crimes of women continued through modern times in the wars in former Yugoslavia Another proof of a mindless troll is when the relevant statistics of the court from The Hague for ex Yugoslavia are stated, where it is clear how many women have been convicted (1), and still you go against reason and facts on your own and without any grounds, plus talk about delusion and dishonesty. It is a pity how many such ideologic…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 03:05 AM
-1

It is a dangerous thing when someone is not familiar with the situation, and then spreads that ignorance over the net. Convicted war criminals in The Hague ordered and committed their crimes for biological and ideological reasons. The man poses a physical danger to the perpetrators both because of his fighting ability and because of his reproductive ability. The criminals were led by the belief that killing men would clear the territory of one nation, and the possibilities of its defense and exp…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 02:00 AM
0

"of course the women and children should be evacuated because they do not have the capability to oppose the men at the front and defend the territories" This assumes a shallow sexist stereotype. Not all men are physically capable to fight, and not all women are incapable. Your mindless relativization and equating of both sexes, and not taking into account the general biological / anatomical advantages of men over women, would in fact lead in practice to a terrible result detrimental to women. Pl…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 01:16 AM
-2

unlike women and children They were also killed, womans and girls systematically raped/impregnant. people like you are so ok with male disposability that you're ok to have men slaughtered People like you and most of those who share an opinion with the OP, are quite ok to relativize and reduce the torture that women have gone through. If you had any consciousness, you would know that it is better to be killed than to go through the tortures of mass rapes that women and girls went through in the m…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 11:47 PM
0

for the crimes of a few You seem to describe yourself because you deny pure statistics that are clear, 1 woman and all other men are perpetrators. And this has nothing to do with feminism, but pure logic and reason.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 09:25 PM
1

you don't really have a good answer for what you said There is no such thing as "good or bad" answer, answer is an answer and it was precisely given, as fact. As if you want a better answer to 1+1=2.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 06:57 PM
0

The previous comment is clear that it cant be clearer why, and youre asking the same thing over again. If you dont see the logic in that total failure, then its up to you and it cant be explained more precisely than it is.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 06:45 PM
-9

I see you saying that most the victims' deaths happened because of other men, but I miss how that's relevant. ... they were still men being killed for being men They were men killed by men, therefore the OPs emphasis on the victims of one gender is totally perfidious, because it was actually committed by one / same gender... and trying to make a men victim argument there is a total failure.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 06:33 PM
2

Dude, you are out of your mind, get some help asap
/r/MensRights06/06/21 03:49 PM
1

You are scum The pinnacle of your intellect in an argumentative discussion
/r/MensRights06/06/21 03:47 PM
-11

in which men are collectively guilty of all crimes committed by other men, as if their culpability is linked to their penis Said someone who denies practical facts, stats and evidence without any counter-argument but a fallacious argumentum ad hominem. You are completely ideologically blinded.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 03:14 PM
-11

For the part in the article about besieged areas, of course the women and children should be evacuated because they do not have the capability to oppose the men at the front and defend the territories, plus you have no insight into the conflict itself where one side was militarily superior, so it would be an additional massacre. (Also to mention that there were also women who voluntarily agreed to participate in the defense, was confirmed in the Bosnian Army) The other big thing is that literall…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 02:23 PM
-1

But we should trust SJW and his estimates he made from his room and not the person who actually were in war... You and all of these downvoters just proved so called MRAs are even more mindless than radical feminists
/r/MensRights06/06/21 01:35 PM
1

You can say that for the one who raised you to be a mindless SJW radical
/r/MensRights06/06/21 01:26 PM
3

Exactly, this whole gender bs only does harm, as when two radical religious groups quarrel over whose god and holy scripts are right... they started verbally, socially and will eventually drag both genders into a real ideological war.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 08:58 PM
-17

As for rape, you do realise men are raped and sexually tortured Dude , as I civilian, do you realise I spend part of my life in Bosnian war, and the longest siege of one city in modern history (Sarajevo), do you really think that you can explain me anything about war? Do you have any sense how mindless your arguing is, just as feminst is? Another stats for your nonsense: 3000 mens/boys were reported raped, while womans/girls 50.000 at least, plus dozens got pregnant. And you still dont get it an…
/r/MensRights05/06/21 08:50 PM
-22

seperating men and women and killing all men, usually letting women go. Stats for Bosnia: "Estimates of the number of women raped during the war range between 10,000 and 50,000, with the further estimate that for one reported rape there are 15 to 20 unreported cases" Both gender conflicted sides are just SJWs who never spend a single day on a battlefield or in war as civilian, and then they tried to be smart and taking out of context things they have no idea about. The victim is a victim, and th…
/r/MensRights05/06/21 07:01 PM
-35

There is no point in taking this out of context for the sake of arguing between two sides in gender conflict. The reality is that both sexes have suffered equally and regardless of age. Men and boys were victims on the battlefield and systematic killings, but women and girls were therefore victims of another form of violence - rape. There are also many cases left out where women, girls and the elderly were killed and tortured also. This out of the context only harms the factual situation, and th…
/r/MensRights05/06/21 06:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter